Justice Iredell Dissents
He was \orlli Carolina's first iiioiiiIht on
llie Supremo Court of tlie I'niteil Stales anil
plavoil »n important part in a ii.iinlior of
leg'islntivf» battles of liis ilay anil lime.
CAROLINA’S first member of
the Supreme Court of the
United States, James Iredell,
was born in England in 1750. Me
emigrated to Carolina when only
seventeen and read law under Gov¬
ernor Samuel Johnston, whose sis¬
ter he married.
He came to the Bar in 1776. and
when the legislature elected the
first Superior Court Judges to be
chosen after the adoption of the
State Constitution in 1776, Iredell
was one of the three chosen. He
did not remain long upon the
bench, and after his resignation
was named Attorney General. This
о
filcc he likewise resigned after
but a short service.
Bayard vs. Singleton
The most famous case in which
Iredell appeared while at the Bar
was that of Bayard vs. Singleton.
which is the first reported case
where an American court held that
the courts possessed the inherent
l>owcr to declare an act of the
legislature void if it was in conflict
with the Constitution. It is a most
singular fact that all five of the
counsel who appeared in that
famous case had Carolina counties
named in their honor, these being
Samuel Johnston, William R.
Davie, James Iredell, who ap-
K-ared for the plaintiff; Abner
ash and Alfred Moore who ap¬
peared for the defendant. A county
was likewise named in honor of
one of the judges who heard the
case — Samuel Ashe. The court
went about the matter cautiously,
carrying the case over a term to
give the legislature an opportunity
to change the law which the court
felt was unconstitutional. But as
the legislature made no change, the
court courageously stuck to its
guns and handed down its opinion
declaring the act void. Threats of
impeachment followed, but these
melted away, and upon a show¬
down the judges were completely
vindicated— the legislature not
only refusing to impeach but
adopting a resolution thanking the
judges for their “faithful service."
The Philadelphia convention had
adopted the Federal Constitution.
Hi/ II. C. LAWRENCE
and the question came on whether
this document should be ratified
by North Carolina. Opposition to
ratification was bitter, and Iredell,
as perhaps the most able of the
Federalists, became its stay and
defender before the Hillsboro con¬
vention which was called to con¬
sider the question. With Iredell,
favoring ratification, stood William
R. Davie and Dr. Hugh Williamson,
whose name is signed to that im¬
mortal instrument. Opposed were
Willie Jones of Halifax, Timothy
Bloodworth, of Wilmington
( blacksmith who was thereafter to
become United States Senator),
the famous and influential Rev.
David Caldwell and other notables.
A Bitter Fight
To read an account of the pub¬
licity just prior to the Convention
one would think the absentee bal¬
lot was under consideration, or
that Deane ns. Burgin was pending
to decide who was entitled to the
nomination for Congress. Willie
Jones was placed in such an em¬
barrassing position that he felt
impelled to make public denial of
the allegation that he had called
the "members of the Grand Con¬
vention generally, and General
Washington and Colonel Davie in
Kticular. scoundrels." No doubt
nd Jones was like the preacher
who said over and over again
"thank God if I did think it. I didn’t
say it." Thomas Person, in whose
honor our county of Person is
named, thrust in an oar and came
out with a statement given wide
publicity, in which he averred that
Washington was a "damned rascal
and traitor to his country for put¬
ting his hand to such an infamous
paper as the new Constitution."
Things were warming up.
When the Convention came on
to be held, the opponents of the
Constitution strenuously opposed
the clause in the preamble. "We
the people.” contending it should
have read "We the States." They
opposed giving the Federal gov¬
ernment the power to levy direct
taxes; they doubted the advisa¬
bility of a Federal judiciary; they
opposed the clauses prohibiting a
State from issuing bills of credit,
passing ex post facto laws, or laws
impairing the obligations of a con¬
tract. Yet other limitations on the
powers of the sovereign States
were opposed. Much was made
of the failure to include a bill
of rights in the document.
Iredell conceded that the Consti¬
tution might need amending but
his contention was ratify first,
amend afterward. Ratification
failed by a vote of 184 to 84. In 1789
another convention was held at
Fayetteville to again consider
ratification, and this time the ad¬
vocates of ratification were in the
large majority. It is often said
that this change was due to the
adoption of the first ten amend¬
ments. but such is not the case.
The ten amendments had been
proposed by Congress but had not
been adopted by a single State.
However. Carolina had been kept
out of the Union long enough to
prevent her vote from being cast
for Washington for President.
On the Supreme Court
In 1790 without his knowledge
(think of it) President Washing¬
ton named Iredell as a Justice of
the Supreme Court of the United
States. The court was not then
held in as high favor as now, nor
was its position so influential in the
councils of government. Wash¬
ington named no less than four
chief justices. One justice resigned
to accept a seat on the Supreme
Court of South Carolina; another
to accept appointment as Comp¬
troller of New Jersey. In 1791,
(he distinguished Carolina lawyer,
William R. Davie, expressed the
opinion "the Federal Judiciary act
of 1789 would disgrace the compo¬
sition of the meanest legislature
of the States.” United States
Senator Johnston in a letter to
Iredell announced his firm determi-
( Continued on page 17)