Page 74 |
Previous | 74 of 134 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
Airport Planning
Planning for airports is of ~t~w_o~~t~y~p~es: pl an nin g the development of t he airport
itself, and fitting the airport into the ove r- a ll plan f o r the community.
The first type of planning involves the creation of an Airport Master Plan.*
The airport Master Pl an concerns itself with the internal, physical elements of a
single airport. It is th e d es igner 's ide a o f how the airport will expand to its
ultimate development . Th e basic element in this plan is the "Master Plan Layout",
which shows "all existing an d propos e d f ac ilities or structures, property lines,
topograph y , utilities, approved departure surfaces, and clear zones in addition to
the ultimate runway and t axiway la you t." Sanford has alrea d y begun airport planning
of this type; this topic will be discu sse d later.
The second t ype of planning, that of determining and establishing the best relationship
between the airport an d the r emain der of the community, is best done before
any airport has been located but is a valuable procedure even if the airport has already
been established, as is true in Sanford. This t ype of planning has been called
"comprehensive planning for air ports," and is deliberatel y integrated with the planning
process for the community as a who le.
Planning The Airport
It was mentioned earlier th at Sanford has already started on Airport Master
Planning, that is, plannin g for the airport itself. This "start" is the "Airport
Master Plan" mentioned earlier, which was dr awn-up by the airport designers as a
blueprint for both the current i mprovemen ts to the airpo rt and future developmen ts
of a basic nature (such as t he ultimate extension of the paved runway).
Sanford's Master Airport Pl an is not intended as an unchangeable specification
of the optimum development of the airpor t, nor as a weakly-based no tion that mus t be
thrown out with the first unexpected event. It is a basic gu ide to development that
provides room for unspecified expansion; it should be kept up-to-date by periodi c
study and revision in the light of new developments. Both the FAA and the airport
desi gne r should be brought in when th e Airport Commission feels that developments
might require a mo dificati on of the original plan.
* FAA, Minimum Require men ts for VFR Airports.
52
Object Description
Description
| Title | Page 74 |
| Full Text | Airport Planning Planning for airports is of ~t~w_o~~t~y~p~es: pl an nin g the development of t he airport itself, and fitting the airport into the ove r- a ll plan f o r the community. The first type of planning involves the creation of an Airport Master Plan.* The airport Master Pl an concerns itself with the internal, physical elements of a single airport. It is th e d es igner 's ide a o f how the airport will expand to its ultimate development . Th e basic element in this plan is the "Master Plan Layout", which shows "all existing an d propos e d f ac ilities or structures, property lines, topograph y , utilities, approved departure surfaces, and clear zones in addition to the ultimate runway and t axiway la you t." Sanford has alrea d y begun airport planning of this type; this topic will be discu sse d later. The second t ype of planning, that of determining and establishing the best relationship between the airport an d the r emain der of the community, is best done before any airport has been located but is a valuable procedure even if the airport has already been established, as is true in Sanford. This t ype of planning has been called "comprehensive planning for air ports," and is deliberatel y integrated with the planning process for the community as a who le. Planning The Airport It was mentioned earlier th at Sanford has already started on Airport Master Planning, that is, plannin g for the airport itself. This "start" is the "Airport Master Plan" mentioned earlier, which was dr awn-up by the airport designers as a blueprint for both the current i mprovemen ts to the airpo rt and future developmen ts of a basic nature (such as t he ultimate extension of the paved runway). Sanford's Master Airport Pl an is not intended as an unchangeable specification of the optimum development of the airpor t, nor as a weakly-based no tion that mus t be thrown out with the first unexpected event. It is a basic gu ide to development that provides room for unspecified expansion; it should be kept up-to-date by periodi c study and revision in the light of new developments. Both the FAA and the airport desi gne r should be brought in when th e Airport Commission feels that developments might require a mo dificati on of the original plan. * FAA, Minimum Require men ts for VFR Airports. 52 |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for Page 74
