Ecosystem Enhancement Program quarterly report

              February 11, 2008
Col. John E. Pulliam, Jr., Commander
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 29402- 1890
Attn: Scott C. McLendon
Re: Memorandum of Agreement ( MOA) Quarterly Report
Dear Col. Pulliam:
The Ecosystem Enhancement Program ( EEP) is pleased to submit the First Quarterly
Report of State Fiscal Year 2007- 2008 to the United States Army Corps of Engineers
( USACE), Wilmington District. This Quarterly Report addresses the period beginning
July 1 and ending September 30, 2007. The materials presented within provide
information as required under Section VII, Part B of the Memorandum of Agreement
among the USACE, the N. C. Department of Transportation ( NCDOT) and the N. C.
Department of Environment and Natural Resources ( NCDENR), signed into effect on
July 22, 2003. The following actions occurred this quarter:
• NCDENR Assistant Secretary for Natural Resources Richard Rogers accepted a
position as executive director of the Clean Water Management Trust Fund. Since
that time, Mr. Manly Wilder has been appointed to assume this position. Mr.
Wilder retired from the Natural Resources Conservation Service with 35 years of
service and joined NCDENR in 2005 as director of the Division of Soil and Water
Conservation before assuming his new duties in the Secretary’s office.
• In August 2007, in partnership with USACE and the NCDOT, a workshop was
held to address surplus assets and develop means to best utilize those resources.
Under the leadership of the Tri- party executives, EEP and NCDOT are
coordinating the action plans according to the recommendations and approvals of
the task force. EEP has temporarily suspended some mitigation project pursuits as
we continue to receive case- by- case mitigation alternatives under a proposal by
NCDOT, and review by USACE.
Col. John E. Pulliam, Jr., Commander
February 11, 2008
Page two
• Overall conformance remains in good standing. Details are provided in this
quarterly report. EEP remains committed to the success of this innovative
partnership. We appreciate the continued leadership provided by your office.
Please contact me should you have any questions regarding this report.
Respectfully,
William D. Gilmore, PE
Director, Ecosystem Enhancement Program
cc: Manly Wilder, Assistant Secretary for Natural Resources, NCDENR
Bill Rosser, Highway Administrator, NCDOT
North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural
Resources
ECOSYSTEM
ENHANCEMENT
PROGRAM
QUARTERLY REPORT
July 1 through September 30, 2007
U. S. Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmington District
This quarterly report is intended to satisfy reporting
requirements of the Memorandum of Agreement as amended
and entered into by the N. C. Department of Environment and
Natural Resources ( NCDENR), the N. C. Department of
Transportation ( NCDOT), and the U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers ( USACE), Wilmington District, on July 22, 2003,
for providing compensatory mitigation through the NCDENR
Ecosystem Enhancement Program to offset impacts to waters
and wetlands due to activities authorized by Clean Water Act
permits.
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report
July 1 through September 30, 2007
Table of Contents
Page
i. Introduction 3
ii. Report Structure 3
Section I. EEP Restoration, Enhancement, Creation, and Preservation Projects 4
EEP Gross Assets 4
EEP Gross Asset Summary 5
EEP Net Remaining Assets 5
EEP Gross High Quality Preservation Assets 5
High Quality Preservation Sites Acquired This Quarter 6
EEP Net High Quality Preservation Assets 7
Section II. Tri- Party Memorandum of Agreement 7
EEP MOA Gross and Net Assets 7
MOA Current Mitigation Requirements, Debits, and Commitments 7
MOA Future Requirements 9
MOA Future Expectations 10
MOA Conformance 10
Section III. In- Lieu Fee ( ILF) Memorandum of Understanding ( MOU) 11
EEP ILF MOU Assets – Gross and Net Assets 11
ILF MOU Present and Future Quarter Mitigation Requirements 11
MOU Net Asset Balances 11
MOU Conformance 12
MOU Future Expectations 13
Section IV. Planning 13
Local Watershed Planning for Projected Impacts 13
Section V. Monitoring 14
USGS Eight- Digit Cataloging Units Map 16
Section VI. EEP Conformance Action Strategies by Cataloging Unit 17
Section VII. Future Conformance 29
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 1
Appendix Listing
Appendix A EEP Gross Asset List of Tier 1 Restoration, Enhancement, Creation, and
Preservation Sites
Appendix B Summary of EEP Gross Assets
Appendix C Net Remaining Asset Credits
Appendix D EEP Gross High Quality Preservation Project List and Summary
D1 – EEP Gross High Quality Preservation Project List
D2 – EEP Gross High Quality Preservation Summary
Appendix E Summaries of EEP High Quality Preservation Assets Utilized and
Remaining
E1 - Net Remaining HQP Assets Summary
E2 – Summary of EEP High Quality Preservation Assets Utilized
Appendix F MOA Mitigation Requirements, Debits, and Commitments
F1- MOA Permit Requirements and Debits
F2- List of EEP MOA Year 4 Mitigation Requirements
F3- Summary of EEP MOA Year 4 Mitigation Requirements
F4- List of EEP MOA Mitigation Commitments
F5- Summary of Outstanding EEP MOA Mitigation Commitments
( Potential Future Requirements Not Yet Permitted)
Appendix G MOA Future Requirements - Remaining NCDOT Projected Impacts
Appendix H MOA Net Asset Balances ( Surplus and Deficits)
Appendix I MOA Outstanding Permit Requirements
Appendix J MOU ILF Present and Future Quarter Mitigation Requirements
Appendix K MOU Net Asset Balances ( Surplus and Deficits)
Appendix L MOU Outstanding Permit Requirements
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 2
i. Introduction
This report covers the period beginning July 1, 2007, through September 30,
2007. This report documents the quarterly status of both the Memorandum of
Understanding ( MOU) between NCDENR and USACE established in 1998 and
Memorandum of Agreement ( MOA) among NCDENR, USACE and NCDOT,
signed July 22, 2003, and combines reporting into a single document. It is
expected that the format of this report will evolve as improvements and
adjustments are suggested and made by USACE and other interested parties. For
more information about the agreements, visit our Web site at www. nceep. net.
ii. Report Structure
This report is broken into seven main sections:
SECTION I. EEP Restoration, Enhancement, Creation and Preservation Projects-
This section reports the EEP stream and wetland restoration, enhancement,
creation, and preservation projects that have been developed under the MOA and
MOU programs. This section lists EEP projects, provides a summary of Gross
Assets, and a summary of Net Assets.
SECTION II. MOA– This section details specifics regarding the MOA program.
SECTION III. MOU– This section details specifics regarding the MOU program.
SECTION IV. Planning– This section summarizes watershed- planning efforts
during the quarter.
SECTION V. Monitoring– This section summarizes project- monitoring efforts
during the quarter.
SECTION VI. Conformance Action Strategies by Cataloging Unit– This section
discusses the specific action strategies EEP has in place to address any
outstanding mitigation needs in the various river basins and cataloging units in
North Carolina.
SECTION VII. Future Conformance – This section explains how delays in
permitting could temporarily impact conformance in several CUs.
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 3
SECTION I:
EEP RESTORATION, ENHANCEMENT, CREATION AND PRESERVATION
PROJECTS
Section I is a report on the status of the restoration, enhancement, creation and
preservation projects developed by the Ecosystem Enhancement Program. High
Quality Preservation ( HQP) projects are also summarized independently of EEP’s
other restoration, enhancement and preservation projects.
EEP GROSS ASSETS
Currently, EEP has assets exceeding 1,537,330 linear feet of stream and 21,747
acres of wetlands. In addition to these, EEP has instituted HQP assets exceeding
1,242,0256 linear feet ( over 235 miles) of streams and 8,549 acres of wetlands.
EEP projects originate from three main areas:
1. Projects that were initiated by NCDOT;
2. Projects that were initiated by the NCDENR Wetlands Restoration
Program; and
3. Projects that have been initiated by EEP.
Appendix A: EEP Gross Asset List of Tier 1 Restoration, Enhancement,
Creation and Preservation Sites contains a complete listing of the current EEP
individual stream and wetland restoration, enhancement, creation and preservation
projects as of Sept. 30, 2007, by river basin and eight- digit Cataloging Unit ( CU).
( HQP sites are not listed in this table.) During July 2007, a number of older
projects experienced asset quantity adjustments; these adjustments are reflected in
this quarterly report. Additionally, a few projects were dropped by EEP during
this quarter due to technical considerations. These projects are discussed in more
detail in Section VI.
All of the projects listed in Appendix A have had their mitigation credits
transferred to or originated from EEP. For former NCDOT projects that had
completed construction prior to the formation of EEP, only the undebited
remaining restoration, enhancement or preservation feet/ acres were transferred.
Thus Appendix A only shows the transferred restoration, enhancement or
preservation remaining for these projects ( i. e., the assets that had not been utilized
by NCDOT). In some cases, former NCDOT projects had no remaining credits
associated with a specific project. These projects are listed as having no gross
assets in Appendix A. All of the other types of projects show the gross amount of
restoration, enhancement or preservation associated with these projects. These
numbers are subject to change as design or monitoring results are received.
Projects initiated ( but not completed/ not debited) by NCDOT’s Project
Development and Environmental Analysis Branch prior to the inception of the
EEP are in various stages of implementation. EEP staff is currently managing
these projects. EEP will use these mitigation credits according to the guidelines
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 4
of the Tri- Party MOA. The projects that were initiated by NCDOT as full-delivery
projects are currently under contract with NCDOT but are available for
debiting for the purposes of EEP, as determined by credit release schedules.
Projects that were initiated and developed by the staff of the NCDENR Wetlands
Restoration Program have been acquired as defined by the 1998 MOU between
USACE and NCDENR, or the 2003 EEP Tri- Party MOA.
EEP GROSS ASSET SUMMARY
Appendix B: Summary of EEP Gross Assets is a summary of the gross assets
by river basin, CU and program ( MOA or MOU). Appendix B also provides
grand totals for the entire state. These numbers are subject to change as design
and/ or monitoring results are received or as new projects are added into the
program. Also, as stated above, former NCDOT sites that were completed and
partially debited prior to the formation of EEP contain only the remaining credits
from each site. This means that only the remaining credits ( as determined by
NCDOT and USACE) were summarized in this table for NCDOT transferred
projects.
EEP NET REMAINING ASSETS
Appendix C: Net Remaining Asset Credits is a summary of the remaining
assets associated with restoration, enhancement, creation and preservation
projects that EEP currently has available to meet compensatory mitigation
requirements. The remaining assets are summarized for the MOA and MOU
programs, respectively. Note that the assets have been converted into restoration
and restoration- equivalent credits in this table. The amounts of mitigation
provided in the table are the total remaining amount of mitigation available to a
particular project over time. Where credit- release schedules have been
established, EEP will debit from these projects accordingly.
Also note that amounts of mitigation for any project may change from the current
snapshot as additional design and monitoring information becomes available, or
as mitigation units are refined as per the goals set forth in the EEP Tri- Party 2007
MOA.
EEP GROSS HIGH QUALITY PRESERVATION ASSETS
All of the High Quality Preservation sites have been acquired by the State except
for one State Parks parcel. That acquisition is expected to be completed during
the next quarter.
Appendix D1: EEP Gross High Quality Preservation Project ( HQP) List
displays all HQP that EEP has acquired since July 2003 by ecoregion. All HQP
quality preservation assets are MOA assets. Gross stream and wetland feet or
acreages are subject to change as additional survey work is completed on these
sites. EEP has protected over 235 miles of stream, along with 7,040 acres of
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 5
riparian wetland and 1,508 acres of non- riparian wetland through High Quality
Preservation. These gross assets are lower than those reported in the final
quarterly report for 2006- 2007, and lower than those reported in the 2006- 2007
Annual Report.
Unfortunately, twelve HQP sites that were listed in quarter 4 of 2006- 2007 as tier
1 sites had to be dropped in Quarter 1 of 2007- 2008. These sites are listed in
Table 1. None of these tier 1 sites had any compensatory mitigation debits
charged to them. EEP stopped acquisition of these projects after NCDOT
reduced their mitigation order. Applications are being made to the State Trust
Funds and other funding sources to complete the acquisition of these sites. They
have been deleted from the EEP mitigation ledger. Because these sites were
dropped, the gross assets attributed to HQP sites are lower than those shown in
the last annual report and quarterly reports.
Table 1. High Quality Preservation Acquisitions Dropped Due to Reduced Mitigation Order
Beginning Balances
Site Name County Eco-region
River
Basin CU TOTAL
Stream
TOTAL
Riverine
TOTAL
Non-
Riverine
Fishing Creek ( Gold Mine) Franklin CP
Tar-
Pamlico 03020102 6,707 20.20 0.00
Fishing Creek ( Maple Branch) Warren CP
Tar-
Pamlico 03020102 8,218 20.00 0.00
IP Upper Fishing Creek 2 Warren CP
Tar-
Pamlico 03020102 5,403 0.00 0.00
IP Upper Reedy Creek Warren CP
Tar-
Pamlico 03020102 5,301 0.00 0.00
Shocco Creek ( IP # 1) Warren CP
Tar-
Pamlico 03020102 4,355 10.00 0.00
Shocco Creek ( IP # 2) Warren CP
Tar-
Pamlico 03020102 4,583 10.00 0.00
IP Lower Fishing Creek 2 Edgecombe NICP
Tar-
Pamlico 03020102 4,419 0.00 0.00
Upper Roanoke ( Civil War) Northampton NICP Roanoke 03010107 1,720 0.00 0.00
Upper Roanoke ( Cypress Cr) Northampton NICP Roanoke 03010107 11,839 0.00 0.00
Upper Roanoke ( Odum/ Cal) Northampton NICP Roanoke 03010107 2,930 0.00 0.00
Juniper Creek IP Columbus SICP Lumber 03040206 22,510 0.0 0.00
Juniper Creek IP Brunswick SOCP Lumber 03040206 431 21.00 0.00
All sites were part of the International Paper transaction. The properties had already been purchased by The Nature
Conservancy on behalf of the State.
No new HQP closings were completed during the quarter.
Appendix D2, EEP Gross HQP Summary lists balances by ecoregion. Total
beginning balances for stream feet is 1,242,025.5, riparian wetland acres is
7,040.47 and non- riparian acres is 1,508.34.
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 6
EEP NET HIGH QUALITY PRESERVATION ASSETS
Appendix E, EEP Net High Quality Preservation ( HQP) Assets lists the net
remaining HQP assets available for future debits by ecoregion. Currently, all
HQP assets are located in the MOA Program. Gross stream and wetland feet or
acreages are subject to change as additional survey work is completed on sites.
More than $ 74 million has been spent to date to protect these conservation lands.
Projections indicate based on NCDOT current mitigation order, that the majority
of these HQP mitigation units will be fully utilized within the current NCDOT
Transportation Improvement Plan ( TIP)
Across the state, EEP has net HQP assets of 797,774 feet ( 151 miles) of stream,
6,482 acres of riverine wetlands and 1,233 acres of non- riverine wetland. These
assets include properties secured with recorded option agreements, permanent
conservation easements, and fee simple purchases.
To further the goal of no net loss of aquatic resources, utilization of these
preservation sites will be accomplished by restoration- type mitigation projects
within the same watershed where impacts occur.
SECTION II:
TRI- PARTY MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT ( MOA)
This section of the report provides specifics with regard to the EEP Tri- Party
MOA. Specifically, this section describes the current EEP mitigation acceptances
under the MOA, the debits that have been made thus far, the schedule for future
debits, and the remaining projected impacts that NCDOT has supplied that may
indicate when future requirements may occur.
EEP MOA GROSS AND NET ASSETS
Both gross and net assets are listed in appendices B and C as described in Section
I.
MOA CURRENT MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS, DEBITS, AND COMMITMENTS
This section describes EEP’s current regulatory requirements, debits and
commitments for the MOA program. The structure of this section has been
modified from previous quarterly reports in an attempt to provide additional
clarity.
EEP, regulatory agencies and NCDOT follow rigorous procedures in order for
EEP to assume mitigation responsibility for NCDOT- permitted impacts.
In accordance with the Tri- Party MOA, NCDOT forecasts impacts associated
with each of its transportation projects. EEP uses this projected impact
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 7
information to develop restoration, enhancement, creation and preservation
projects sufficient to meet mitigation needs and timelines. Approximately six- to-nine
months in advance of an individual NCDOT transportation- project letting,
NCDOT formally submits a request to EEP to provide the mitigation. EEP
reviews each request and submits acceptance letters to NCDOT and the regulatory
agencies for each project where EEP assumes mitigation responsibility. These
acceptance letters are used during NCDOT’s permitting process. Typically, there
is a three- to- six month time period between EEP’s acceptance letters and the
permit issuance. The permit specifies the responsible party ( EEP for off- site
mitigation), location, amount and type of the mitigation. Prior to permit
issuances, all EEP- issued acceptance letters are considered “ commitments.” After
permit issuances, EEP’s commitments are transformed into mitigation
“ requirements.” The permit issuance date determines the timeframes when EEP
must provide the mitigation ( this time frame is often called the debit- due date).
On March 8, 2007, Section X of the Tri- Party MOA was amended which changed
the future mitigation debit- due dates and mitigation milestones. For MOA
permits issued in MOA Year 5 ( July 1, 2007 through June 30, 2008), the debit-due
date is June 30, 2008. ( For MOU permits issued in MOA Year 5, the debit
due date is June 30, 2009.)
Appendix F is a series of five tables listing data for MOA Mitigation
Requirements, Debits, and Commitments.
F1- MOA Permit Requirements and Debits lists all mitigation requirements
that were due as of September 30, 2007, and lists mitigation debits that have been
made to offset those requirements.
F2- List of EEP MOA Year 5 Mitigation Requirements lists projects for which
permits have been accepted, issued and received by EEP in MOA Year 5.
Mitigation for these projects will be due on June 30, 2008.
F3- Summary of EEP MOA Year 5 Mitigation Requirements summarizes
mitigation requirements for projects listed in Appendix F2.
F4- List of EEP MOA Mitigation Commitments lists projects in which EEP has
issued mitigation acceptance letters, but permits have not yet been
issued/ received. The mitigation due date is determined by permit issuance date
and Section X of the 2007 TriParty MOA. Since these projects have not yet been
permitted, mitigation has not yet been required. However, EEP has applied some
credits in advance. The table lists the HQP sites that have been debited and
applied in advance of the official mitigation due date.
( Note: Impacts and mitigation requirements listed in table F4 are projections
only. The actual finalized impacts and mitigation requirements will not be known
until permits are issued. However, the table does list the amount of mitigation
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 8
that EEP has thus far committed to provide for these projects as detailed in EEP’s
mitigation- acceptance letters.)
F5- Summary of Outstanding EEP MOA Mitigation Commitments
summarizes the list of commitments detailed in Appendix F4.
MOA FUTURE REQUIREMENTS
Appendix G: MOA Future Requirements - Remaining NCDOT Projected
Impacts is a summary of the NCDOT mitigation order shown as impacts
associated with NCDOT’s seven- year Transportation Improvement Plan ( TIP).
Appendix G is summarized by MOA impact year, river basin and CU. The data
in Appendix G originates from the original seven- year impact forecast submitted
by NCDOT to EEP in February 2007. Some of the individual project impact
projections have been updated by more recently collected field data. These
revised impacts were submitted by NCDOT on a project- by- project basis over the
last quarter. Appendix G has also been updated to show only the remaining
forecasted impacts covering the seven- year projection time period. In other
words, since February 2007 some of the original forecasted impacts are no longer
forecasts, as NCDOT has formally requested that EEP accept mitigation
responsibility for specific impacts associated with the transportation projects.
Appendix G shows only those projects where NCDOT has yet to request
mitigation or where EEP has not yet formally accepted mitigation responsibility.
NCDOT divisions were unable to provide impacts by individual MOA Year and
developed a lump- sum estimate for seven years. This lump- sum amount was
spread evenly through each of the seven TIP years.
All projects that were projected to occur in MOA Years 1, 2, or 3 and that were
not accepted or permitted during these periods are now considered as MOA Year
5 impact projections.
The TIP list is a dynamic list where individual project let dates frequently move in
time. Major accelerations or volatility of project lettings or impact projections
could result in major changes to EEP’s potential mitigation requirements and
EEP’s procurement strategies.
MOA FUTURE EXPECTATIONS
During Year 4, the issue of surplus assets became significant among the Tri- Party
agencies. At the time of this report, “ surplus assets” were defined as “ unused”
credits that are projected to be remaining after accounting for the number of
credits that will be used to meet the current TIP ( 5 to 6 years of TIP projects) and
one year of ILF requirements. Surplus assets currently exist in a number of CUs.
Surplus assets were mostly developed during the pre- EEP era when NCDOT
initiated its first attempt at developing advanced mitigation. Unfortunately, these
advances were often made without the benefit of precise forecasts of mitigation
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 9
need. These sites were originally developed with the intent to negotiate usage on
a case- by- case basis. Today, many of these sites contain credits that exceed the
forecasted need of the current TIP. Surplus mitigation has also been created when
mitigation orders based on forecasted mitigation needs have exceeded actual
permitted mitigation requirements. Incidental procurement ( when wetlands and
stream credits exist on the same project, though only one type may be needed)
and asset- yield variation on existing projects may also lead to small amounts of
forecasted surplus.
NCDOT also has been experiencing financial strain and has expressed an interest
in utilizing these advanced mitigation credits to offset current and future
mitigation need. To address these issues, NCDOT, USACE and DENR met in
July 2007 to develop a plan to:
1. Create a strategy for reducing existing surplus assets used for offsetting
NCDOT project impacts. This became the top priority for the August surplus-assets
workshop.
2. Prevent the creation of new surplus assets that are intended to offset NCDOT
project impacts.
During this surplus- strategy development period and after discussions with
USACE, DENR, and NCDOT, EEP has ceased procurement of new mitigation
sites in CUs in river basins that contain surplus credits. Consequently, MOA
conformance in these river basins may decline through the next MOA year
due to the requested hold on procuring new mitigation sites in these areas.
This decrease in conformance will be moderated due to the substantial advanced
mitigation that has already been achieved for MOA Year 5. During this quarter,
only stream conformance due to two projects being dropped for technical reasons.
These projects are discussed in detail in Section VI. Appendix H: MOA Net
Asset Balances ( Surplus and Deficits) demonstrates the current health of the
program by showing the current net surpluses and deficits associated with the
MOA program as of Sept. 30, 2007.
As shown in Appendix C, EEP has obtained a program- wide 693,947 advanced
stream credits, 3,134.92 advanced riparian- wetland credits, 6,967.58 advanced
nonriparian- wetland credits and 103.47 advanced coastal- marsh wetland credits.
Of these amounts, the MOA program had advanced 655,057 stream credits,
3,005.01 riparian credits, 6,868.25 nonriparian credits, and 100.45 coastal marsh
credits. These advanced summaries do not include the advanced and unused HQP
assets which are shown in Appendix E1. These credits are advanced credits that
will be applied to future permits as mitigation is needed.
MOA CONFORMANCE
During the first quarter, overall MOA conformance decreased slightly since the
last quarter. While riparian, nonriparian, and coastal marsh conformance
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 10
remained unchanged at 98.14 percent, 100 percent, and 100 percent respectively,
stream conformance lowered from 98.14 percent to 93.82 percent as 3 previously
met requirements became partially non- conformant as a result of EEP dropping
the Black Gum Creek Full Delivery project and the Middle Swamp Creek project
due to technical concerns.
The current outstanding stream, riparian wetland and nonriparian wetland
mitigation for Quarter 3 is 13,850.6 stream credits, 2.394 riparian credits, and
zero nonriparian credits and zero coastal- marsh credits, respectively. The number
of permits needing additional mitigation increase seven to 10 permits.
A complete listing of the MOA permit requirements not in full conformance is
listed in Appendix I: MOA Outstanding Permit Requirements. All 10
permits needing additional mitigation have been partially fulfilled. EEP’s
Conformance Action Strategies for outstanding mitigation requirements are
detailed in Section VI.
SECTION III:
IN- LIEU FEE ( ILF) MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ( MOU)
EEP ILF MOU ASSETS – GROSS AND NET ASSETS
Both gross and net assets are listed in appendices B and C as described in Section
I.
ILF MOU PRESENT AND FUTURE QUARTER MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS
The MOU program had 68 new requirements that became due this quarter ( up 23
since last quarter), representing 16,683 credits of stream, 26.49 credits of riparian
wetland, 14.63 credits of nonriparian wetland and 0.16 credits of coastal- marsh
requirements. A complete summary of the requirements that became due is listed
in Appendix J: MOU ILF Present and Future Quarter Mitigation
Requirements. Appendix J also lists requirements that will become due over the
next quarter. The requirements associated with the MOU Program are generally
lower than historical levels ( though the current quarter can be consider a large
amount under the new scale). This decrease is a result of NCDOT departing the
ILF MOU program. Almost all new NCDOT mitigation requirements are now
being handled under the Tri- Party MOA. However, the number of non- NCDOT
applicants and the amount of mitigation associated with these applicants is
increasing each year.
MOU NET ASSET BALANCES
Unlike the Tri- Party MOA program, the goal of which is to develop assets up to
seven years in advance of permitted impacts, the MOU program is designed to
produce instituted mitigation assets one year from the permit year in which a
permit is issued.
Another major objective of the MOU program is to have an ILF project
appropriate to pay the actual cost of restoration. Together, these two goals result
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 11
in a delicate balance of building assets in just the right sizes and just the right
amounts in each of the CUs to offset permitted requirements, while maintaining
sufficient funds to pay for the required mitigation projects. In order to capitalize
on efficiencies of scale, restoration project sizes tend to be large. On the other
hand, ILF mitigation requirements tend to be very small. Thus there is always the
potential to create surplus assets in some CUs and deficits in other CUs. The
MOU program is at optimal performance when there are zero surplus assets and
zero requirement deficits, and zero remaining funds.
The current net ILF program- asset balances ( surplus and deficits) are shown in
Appendix K: MOU Net Asset Balances. The ILF program has produced a net
statewide asset balance of 32,148 stream credits, 117.91 riparian- wetland credits,
95.64 nonriparian- wetland credits and 2.83 coastal- marsh wetland credits.
These asset balances show a decrease from the previous quarter in net balances
for stream credits, riparian wetlands, nonriparian wetlands and coastal marsh.
During the last quarter, the net asset balance was 41,837 credits of stream, 143.58
credits of riparian wetlands, 99.89 nonriparian- wetland credits and 3.34 coastal-marsh
wetland credits.
( Note: The total amounts of MOU available unused credits are shown in
Appendix C. The available unused credits are larger because outstanding
requirements ( deficits) are not considered in Appendix C.)
MOU CONFORMANCE
The amount of nonconformance ( as measured in number of permit requirements
met) decreased slightly during the current quarter with the addition of 68 new
requirements. During the last quarter, 97.61 percent of requirements were fully
met. This quarter, 96.76percent of all requirements were fully met.
As of Sept. 30, 2007, the MOU program had 803 total requirements. Of these,
777 are conformant, six are in partial conformance and 20 are in non-conformance.
Therefore the EEP has 96.76 percent of all MOU requirements in
full conformance, 0.7% in partial conformance and 2.5 percent in non-conformance.
During the previous quarter, 18 requirements had not been fully
met. Of the 26 non- conformant requirements, 20 were related to wetland
requirements, and six were related to stream requirements.
The magnitude of outstanding stream requirements decreased this quarter. At the
end of the last quarter, EEP had not met 6,886 credits of stream mitigation. As of
Sept. 30, 2007, the remaining outstanding stream mitigation needs were 6,742
stream credits.
The magnitude of outstanding riparian increased from 9.3 credits to 12 credits.
The magnitude of outstanding nonriparian increased from 1.11 to 3.70 nonriparian
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 12
wetland credits. The magnitude of outstanding coastal marsh credits decreased
from 1.11 to 0.20 coastal- marsh wetland credits.
A complete listing of the permit requirements not in full conformance is listed in
Appendix L: MOU Outstanding Permit Requirements. A narrative addressing
EEP action plans for non- conformant CUs is included in this report in Section VI.
MOU FUTURE EXPECTATIONS
The status of the MOU program is expected to be relatively steady over the course
of the next fiscal year, though some decreases in conformance may be expected
since all EEP projects in development were placed on hold between June and
November 2007 while the surplus- asset issue previously described was being
discussed among the Tri- Party agencies. Additional buying and selling of excess
assets between the MOA and MOU programs is expected to continue. These
transactions will result in improved conformance capabilities for both programs.
SECTION IV: PLANNING
In Quarter 2, EEP began the following watershed planning initiatives:
• Collaboration with Wake County government agencies to develop a countywide
watershed plan. The proposed strategy under development will combine the
county’s desire to purchase easements and preserve green space with EEP’s
mission to produce projects that improve watershed function.
• Participation in the Chatham County Partnership to help promote implementation
of the Rocky River Local Watershed Planning ( LWP) and identify wetland
restoration opportunities.
• Initiation of contracts to develop a new LWP in the Goose and Crooked Creek
watersheds near Monroe in the Yadkin 05 CU. ( This project was placed on hold
pending DOT budget approval.)
• Scoped a contract to perform landowner outreach for priority restoration projects
in the Muddy Creek watershed in McDowell County, in the Catawba 01 catalog
unit.
• Phase IV activities in the Peachtree- Martins Creek LWP area, focusing on
landowner outreach for priority restoration opportunities.
• Discussions with local resource professionals in Surry County in advance of a
proposed new watershed planning initiative to support mitigation efforts in
Yadkin 01. ( This project was placed on hold pending DOT budget approval.)
EEP continued the following initiatives:
• CU- screening activities in Little Tennessee 01, 02, and 03, Chowan 03 and 04,
Yadkin 05 and 202; and Cape Fear 04, 05, 06 and 07, to develop River Basin
Restoration Priorities. Activities included analyzing Watershed Attribute
Matrices, conducting field site visits, meeting with local resource professionals
and hosting workshops to solicit input on priority watersheds for restoration.
• Phase IV activities in the Lower Creek LWP area ( Catawba 01), consisting of
EEP planners participating on Lower Creek Advisory Team ( LCAT), meeting
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 13
with the Education subcommittee to assist local watershed education efforts, and
working with Implementation staff to “ ground- truth” LWP- identified project
sites.
• Joint Phase IV plan development for the Little Lick Creek, Lick Creek, Ellerbe
Creek, Swift Creek and Lake Rogers watersheds in the Upper Neuse.
• Crisp Creek Drainage District Phase IV plan demonstration project in Tar-
Pamlico 03.
• Phase II Fishing Creek LWP, including a fifth stakeholder meeting in Oxford in
October.
• Phases I & II LWP in White Oak 01 and White Oak 06 CUs.
• Phase II fieldwork for the Tickle, Travis, and Little Alamance Local Watershed
Plan, including field assessment of streams, and continued work on water quality
assessment.
• Received second set of new data from the N. C. Center for Geographic
Information and Analysis for CU screening.
• Contributed to the N. C. Submerged Aquatic Vegetation( SAV) mapping initiative
and began developing a white paper that discusses the potential for SAV
restoration in the state.
• Continued work with Tetra Tech in the Catawba 03 CU to assess and identify
non- traditional mitigation opportunities to accommodate unmet wetland needs.
• Continued collaborative work with the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service and other
state and federal agencies on aquatic organism passage in the Little Tennessee
River basin.
EEP completed the following initiatives:
• CU- screening activities in Catawba 01, 02, and 03 to develop River Basin
Restoration Priorities.
• Stoney Creek Local Watershed Plan Phase IV was presented to the Wayne
County Board of Commissioners and to the Goldsboro City Council.
• Phases I- III of the Peachtree- Martins Creek LWP effort were completed with the
development of the Watershed Management Plan and presentation of the plan
during a public meeting.
SECTION V:
MONITORING
For the first quarter, monitoring staff were involved in maintenance site
assessment, full- delivery site assessment, closeout of Wildlife Resources
Commission( WRC) stream projects and asset verification. Monitoring staff
participated in an assessment of specified maintenance projects. In addition to
assessment, staff members utilized this time as a maintenance training opportunity
internal to the Project Control and Research Group of EEP. Moreover, staff
members also participated in an assessment of select full- delivery sites.
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 14
Throughout the quarter, staff members have participated in closeout activities
related to EEP projects. Several WRC stream projects were proposed and visited
during this period to verify the status and fitness for closeout for the PACG- TC.
During this quarter every year henceforth, monitoring staff will conduct an asset
verification on all projects in Year 3 of monitoring. The purpose of this effort is
to provide a check of the assets for the Strategic Planning Section.
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 15
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 16
SECTION VI:
EEP COMPLIANCE ACTION STRATEGIES BY CATALOGING UNIT
ACTION STRATEGIES FOR NON- COMPLIANT CUs
CAPE FEAR 03030002
Outstanding Mitigation Required
Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent
Streams 0 0
Riparian 0 0
Non- Riparian 0.15 0.15
Coastal Marsh 0 0
Background:
Cape Fear 03030002 is a high demand CU for stream- and- riparian mitigation
needs. Nonriparian- mitigation impacts are inconsistent, most likely due to the
relative scarcity of nonriparian wetlands in the watershed.
CU Immediate Action Plan:
The Watershed Planning and Program Implementation Group has been assigned
responsibility for procuring 2.5 Restoration ( R) and 2.0 Restoration Equivalent
( RE) type nonriparian- mitigation credits before the end of Year 5.
CU Long- Range Action Plan:
EEP plans to issue Full Delivery Proposals for Nonriparian Wetland mitigation
credits for the long term needs within the CU. The magnitude of the request will
be based primarily on projected NCDOT long term nonriparian- wetland
mitigation needs.
CATAWBA 03050103
Outstanding Mitigation Required
Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent
Streams 0 0
Riparian 5.33 3.80
Non- Riparian 1.80 0
Coastal Marsh 0 0
Background:
Catawba 03050103 has been identified as a critical CU watershed in the state by
EEP, as it is a very difficult CU for producing compensatory mitigation for
streams and wetlands. Catawba 03050103 is comprised mostly of the greater
Charlotte metropolitan area. Most streams in Catawba 03050103 are degraded
and have experienced the growing pains of urbanization and, more recently,
suburban sprawl. Urbanization presents challenges in producing stream-
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 17
mitigation projects due to arduous constraints often in place along these streams.
Typical constraints include sewer lines along and in the streams; residential,
industrial and commercial development in the floodplain; FEMA- regulated
streams; hazardous waste; stormwater outlets; unknown pipe outlets; local
ordinances; leaking sewer lines; chemical spills; local landfills within the stream;
the relative large size of streams per acre watershed; large numbers of landowners
per potential project site; etc. Each of these constraints limits the type and size of
the potential stream- restoration project, and also significantly increases the cost of
these projects. Nevertheless, EEP has worked closely with Mecklenburg County,
the City of Charlotte, and the regulatory agencies to produce adequate stream-mitigation
projects to compensate for impacts. However, since impacts are
continuing at a rapid rate, it is unlikely that EEP can continue to produce
traditional stream- mitigation projects within the CU at the same rate that
mitigation requirements are being produced.
Wetlands restoration is extremely limited within this CU. Nearly all of remaining
wetlands within the CU are located along large river floodplains, or are relatively
small mafic- type depressional wetlands. These wetlands are continually being
impacted, as development and urbanization is occurring at very high levels within
this CU. Restoration opportunities for these types of wetlands do not exist in any
significant quantity within this CU. Most of the historical wetlands loss is
currently occupied either by development or located along riparian systems.
Wetlands restoration along riparian systems is also typically not possible because
the streams are regulated under stringent FEMA no- rise regulations. In order to
perform most riparian- wetlands restoration, the stream level often needs to be
elevated so that the stream can access its historic floodplain. FEMA and local
regulations make this exceedingly difficult in most of this CU. Also, raising flood
elevations is problematic because of the amount of floodplain development
located in this CU. Finally, locating suitable wetlands- restoration opportunities
has been made more difficult because of soil mapping in Mecklenburg County.
The current Mecklenburg Division of Soil and Water soil map has not indicated
any hydric A soils. While hydric A soils certainly exist in Mecklenburg, the maps
do not detail their locations. Typically, floodplains are mapped as Monacan soils,
which often have hydric inclusions.
Another problem associated with wetlands restoration within this CU is the
amount of time it will take for a specific wetlands- restoration project to be
constructed. Due to FEMA and local regulations, most wetlands projects will
need to undergo a long flood- level modeling and evaluation period. The result is
one- to- three additional years to complete construction beyond projects that do not
require this level of modeling.
This historical presence of endangered mussel species also has made
implementation of projects difficult in this watershed. EEP is having difficulty in
getting permits to implement some projects in the watershed due to USFW agency
concerns that the restoration of upstream tributaries will cause temporary
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 18
sedimentation during construction that could negatively affect downstream
populations of endangered species. The USFWS supports riparian vegetation
restoration only in these types of areas. Unfortunately, the in- stream conditions of
many of these degraded streams are too unstable to allow for riparian vegetation
only restoration to be successful.
The overall degree of difficulty in identifying stream- and wetlands- restoration
opportunities is reflected in the results of the last six RFPs issued by EEP and the
Wetlands Restoration Program. After the first five RFP requests, EEP/ WRP had
received zero wetland project submittals and only two small stream projects. The
stream projects were located along the outer edge of the developing regions. Four
of the last five requests have received no response. The last RFP has had some
submittals. These submittals were expected to be opened during the last quarter
but were delayed. They were opened during the current quarter. After review,
the submittals were rejected due to extremely high costs.
Historically, there have been 45 requirements paid and now due in the MOU
program in Catawba 03050103. Of these, 34 have been stream requirements, nine
riparian requirements and two nonriparian requirements. The MOA program
currently has had no mitigation requirements in Catawba 03.
CU Immediate Action Plan:
The lower Catawba CU is a chronic problem and critical watershed for
implementing stream- and wetland- mitigation projects due to the urban nature of
the CU, local and federal laws, and flooding concerns. Also, there is very little
opportunity for high- quality wetland projects. Recognizing the limitations and
chronic issues associated within the Catawba 03050103 watershed, this past
quarter the Program Assessment and Consistency Group ( PACG) passed
mitigation guidance that allows the use of mitigation assets in Catawba 03050102
and the lower portion of Catawba 03050103 ( falling within or partially within the
Southern Outer Piedmont Ecoregion) to be used to offset mitigation needs in
Catawba 03050103 for either the MOU and MOA in lieu fee programs. The new
policy will require a 50 percent penalty ratio when being used to address permit
requirements in effect prior to the issuance of the policy. No penalty will be
applied when addressing permit requirements that became effective after the
issuance of the policy.
To achieve the remaining outstanding mitigation requirements, the EEP is relying
on a number of traditional and alternative strategies:
1. EEP Watershed Planning and Project Implementation initiated a
survey of Catawba 03030102 for additional wetland- restoration
opportunities.
2. Re- issuance of a request for full- delivery projects after EEP has
completed its internal survey and received revised NCDOT impact
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 19
projections for the revised TIP. ( The RFP re- issuance is currently on
hold pending resolution of surplus issue raised by NCDOT Board of
Transportation and EEP Watershed Planning and Project
Implementation efforts in locating suitable mitigation in expanded
service area.)
3. Potential implementation of nontraditional projects based on the
Charlotte LWP Initiative. Numerous sites identified through this
planning effort have yielded nontraditional wetland- and stream-mitigation
opportunities. EEP has presented these projects to the
PACG and is awaiting approval of the methodology to calculate
mitigation credits before proceeding with these projects. One year
ago ( four quarters ago), the Non- Traditional Mitigation Steering
Committee modified the EEP’s functional/ credit methodology based
on the PACG and the PACG- TC’s previous comments. EEP is
awaiting approval of the methodology. If the methodology is not
approved soon, the identified projects will no longer be available for
implementation.
4. Evaluation of the CU for wetlands- preservation opportunities that
may be able to provide some mitigation credit towards the wetland
deficits. EEP Planning has identified multiple preservation sites and
is directing local watershed planning to identify, assess and acquire
these sites. One project has been identified during the current quarter
that will yield 2.5 mitigation credits.
5. Use existing assets or generate new assets in the lower portion of
Catawba 03050101 for the MOU Program. EEP has approval from
USACE ( reference letter May 21, 2004 from Ken Jolly to Bill
Gilmore) to use wetlands assets in the lower portion of Catawba
03050101 to offset these deficits.
6. Use existing assets or generate new assets in Catawba 03050102 and
the lower portion of Catawba 03050101 per the passed PACG
guidance issued this past quarter. Existing wetlands in Catawba
03050102 have been utilized save for wetlands that have been
earmarked to offset additional mitigation needs that may be necessary
to meet NCDOT permit shortfalls associated with the NCDOT Little
Sugar mitigation project. EEP is awaiting transfer of mitigation permit
responsibility to EEP prior to utilizing these remaining credits to
mitigate for these pre- EEP mitigation shortfalls.
7. Evaluation of wetlands restoration on Chewacla soils. EEP has
discussed with USACE the possibility of pursuing wetlands restoration
sites with Chewacla soil types in association with priority one stream
restoration opportunities. Additional potential wetland opportunities
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 20
have been identified on the Pott Creek II mitigation site. The
feasibility of this potential is currently being evaluated.
8. Utilize HQP assets generated in the MOA program to offset riparian
wetland restoration equivalent needs for the MOU program. PACG
and NCDOT authorization is needed to allow for these credits to be
sold and used by the MOU program.
CHOWAN 03010204
Outstanding Mitigation Required
Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent
Streams 0 0
Riparian 0 0
Non- Riparian 0.022 0.022
Coastal Marsh 0 0
Background:
The Chowan river basin has historically had little activity for the EEP’s mitigation
programs. Only one payment has ever been made in the river basin in history of
the programs. The payment became due this quarter totaling 0.044 nonriparian
mitigation credits.
CU Immediate Action Plan:
The EEP Watershed Planning and Project Implementation group has been
assigned to identify a nonriparian mitigation project suitable to meet the current
and long- term mitigation needs in this watershed. Unfortunately, due to excessive
surplus located in the Pasquotank River Basin, the WPPI initiative has been
placed on hold pending the discussions between the regulatory agencies,
NCDENR, and NCDOT regarding the potential use of these credits to meet
permit needs in the Chowan River Basin. More than 1,110 nonriparian surplus
credits exist in the Pasquotank River Basin that could be used to offset mitigation
needs.
CU Long- Range Action Plan:
Long range needs in this watershed are projected to be 9.14 nonriparian
mitigation credits. EEP Watershed Planning and Project Implementation group
has been assigned to identify and implement projects sufficient to meet long- term
needs. As stated above, this initiative is currently on hold pending the outcome of
the interagency surplus- asset discussions.
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 21
HIWASSEE 06020002
Outstanding Mitigation Required
Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent
Streams 4,372 0
Riparian 0.82 0
Non- Riparian 0 0
Coastal Marsh 0 0
Background:
The Hiwassee River Basin has historically been an area of limited activity for
EEP. As a result it has taken the program more time to develop restoration
projects in this area. At the end of the transition period on July 22, 2005, EEP did
not have the restoration available to supplement the HQP used to cover one
permit during the transition. Until the restoration has been instituted, EEP is
continuing to cover the affected permit with 10: 1 HQP. ( Note There was a
database error recording the total number of credits associated with and debited
from the Trout Cove Branch project located in Hiwassee 06020002 during the
current quarter- the total amount of credits is currently 3,900 rather than 1,876 as
reported within this report. This error will be corrected in the next quarterly
report.)
CU Immediate Action Plan:
Currently, EEP has identified three projects representing 15,240 stream credits
and 6.13 riparian wetland credits and 3.76 nonriparian credits. EEP is continuing
to negotiate with the landowners on two of these projects representing 10,740
stream credits, 1.13 riparian credits, and 2.26 nonriparian credits. If these projects
are acquired and instituted, EEP will have sufficient stream and wetland credits in
this CU. If this negotiation fails, EEP is prepared to issue a full- delivery request
to meet the outstanding mitigation need.
CU Long- Range Action Plan:
EEP is developing a LWP in this CU in partnership with the Hiwassee River
Watershed Coalition to continue to develop quality restoration opportunities to
meet current and future needs in this CU.
LITTLE TENNESSEE 06010203
Outstanding Mitigation Required
Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent
Streams 144 144
Riparian 0 0
Non- Riparian 0 0
Coastal Marsh 0 0
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 22
Background:
This CU has historically had little activity. EEP currently only has one permit
requirement in this CU. This permit requirement had previously been met by the
Frizell Full Delivery Project. However an Indian burial ground was discovered
during the current quarter on Frizell that prevents the implementation of the
project. Consequently, the Frizell stream- restoration project has been terminated.
CU Action Plan:
The EEP Watershed Planning and Project Implementation group has been
assigned the task of identifying a stream and riparian wetland project designed to
meet the current and future stream- and wetland- mitigation needs in this CU.
LUMBER 03040203
Outstanding Mitigation Required
Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent
Streams 9,318 0
Riparian 0 0
Non- Riparian 0 0
Coastal Marsh 0 0
Background:
Two projects in this watershed were dropped during the current quarter resulting
in the outstanding stream- mitigation needs: Middle Swamp Creek and Black
Gum Creek.
The Middle Swamp Creek was a very large stream restoration located in the
coastal plain. The design and permitting process for this project had been difficult
but permits had been acquired for implementation of the project. However, based
on the Feb. 7 – 8, 2007 Coastal Issues Forum, the resulting change in coastal
stream- restoration guidance and as the difficulty expected in constructing this
project, a decision was made to terminate this project. The project would have
resulted in the removal of some forested riparian areas as well as the
establishment of some stream channels in locations where it was difficult to
determine if stream channels had historically existed. The Black Gum Creek was
also a very large stream- mitigation project that had been secured via the full-delivery
process. The project was intended to produce 10,000 warm stream
credits. The full- delivery provider was unable to implement the project due to the
new coastal stream- restoration guidance. These decisions to drop these projects
( and replace them with other projects) reflect the joint collaborative efforts on the
part of EEP and the regulatory agencies to continue to improve the type and
quality of stream- restoration efforts in the coastal plain.
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 23
LUMBER 03040206
Outstanding Mitigation Required
Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent
Streams 0 0
Riparian 0.14 0
Non- Riparian 1.113 0.02
Coastal Marsh 0 0
Background:
The Lumber 03040206 CU has seen limited activity since the inception of the
Wetlands Restoration Program in 1998. EEP has four MOU requirements and
one MOA requirement in Lumber 03040206, including two riparian and three
nonriparian. The magnitude of all five requirements is relatively small in
comparison to other areas of this river basin. One of the three MOU riparian- and
nonriparian- wetland requirements due is being partially met. The MOA program
had one nonriparian wetland requirement in this CU that is covered with a
riparian asset.
CU Action Plan:
Due to low activity in this CU in the MOA program and no new activity for the
MOU program, EEP has not initiated a full LWP, and the amount of current and
anticipated future impacts does not warrant initiating that action. EEP has
identified one available mitigation site in the CU; however, the credits generated
by the site are not sufficient to meet needs for both the MOU and MOA programs.
EEP will propose that the PACG invoke the small impacts policy for the
nonriparian wetland requirements approved in the amendment to the MOU signed
on March 8, 2007. Currently, there are no riparian wetland assets in an adjacent
CU. EEP staff will continue to actively search in the CU for suitable areas to
conduct a small- to medium- sized mitigation site for current and future needs.
However, due to the surplus- assets issues associated with adjacent CUs,
procurement and implementation for future MOA mitigation needs within
Lumber 03040206 is currently suspended pending resolution of the interagency
surplus- assets discussions.
LUMBER 03040207
Outstanding Mitigation Required
Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent
Streams 15 0
Riparian 0.03 0
Non- Riparian 0 0
Coastal Marsh 0 0
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 24
Background:
Lumber 03040207 currently has 15 stream credit and 0.03 riparian credit
shortfalls to meet current regulatory requirements.
CU Immediate Action Plan:
The Watershed Planning and Project Implementation Group has been assigned to
identify and implement a stream project that generates a minimum of 1,846
stream credits and 4.21 riparian wetland credits. These amounts represent the
total needed to meet current outstanding needs plus all future projected needs
within the CU for the current TIP.
NEUSE 03020201
Outstanding Mitigation Required
Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent
Streams 874 614
Riparian 0 0
Non- Riparian 0 0
Coastal Marsh 0 0
Background:
Neuse 03020201 is one of the most active areas in North Carolina where EEP
provides mitigation. Consequently, EEP is heavily involved in watershed-planning
and restoration- project development. Historically, EEP has been highly
successful at meeting all the mitigation needs in this CU. The current
nonconformance is associated with a project falling off of the asset list due to an
option expiring. Property acquisition is continuing and this project is expected to
be acquired soon.
CU Immediate Action Plan:
Completed acquisition of the project that had the expired option will bring the CU
back into conformance. EEP has in development 19,033 stream credits, 10.20
riparian credits and 0.10 nonriparian credits associated with three identified
projects. EEP has also initiated procurement of an additional 18,100 stream
credits through the existing LWPs. EEP also plans on utilizing 14,000 existing
HQP stream credits over the next few years for MOA program needs.
Due to the surplus- assets issue, EEP has suspended all MOA procurement in
Neuse 03020201 pending the outcomes of the interagency discussions. The
suspended amounts of mitigation include 28,600 stream credits and 10 riparian
credits discussed in the preceding paragraph.
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 25
NEUSE 03020202
Outstanding Mitigation Required
Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent
Streams 1,981 2,985
Riparian 0 0
Non- Riparian 0 0
Coastal Marsh 0 0
Background:
Neuse 03020202 had one permit requirement within the MOU program come due
last quarter. EEP issued a Request for Proposals in this CU in the fourth quarter,
but opening of these full- delivery projects was placed on hold pending the
NCDOT surplus- assets discussions. These full- delivery projects were opened and
evaluated for contracting during the current quarter. A contract award for a new
full delivery project is expected to take place during the next quarter. Once the
project has been awarded and instituted, this CU will once again be fully
compliant.
CU Immediate Action Plan:
The immediate action plan is to contract one or more of the full- delivery projects
within the MOU program to meet the outstanding mitigation needs.
TAR- PAMLICO 03020105
Outstanding Mitigation Required
Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent
Streams 146 0
Riparian 0 0
Non- Riparian 0 0
Coastal Marsh 0.10 0.10
Background:
The Tar- Pamlico 03020105 CU has seen virtually no activity since the inception
of the Wetlands Restoration Program in 1998. Prior to 2006, the MOU program
had only accepted one conservation easement as mitigation on behalf of USACE.
However, recent activity has been very high: three riparian, 17 nonriparian and
one coastal marsh payments have been made during the last year and came due.
Although activity has been high, the magnitude is very small. The MOU program
currently has one small coastal- marsh wetland requirement ( 0.2 coastal- marsh
credits) that is unmet. The MOA program has one small stream and one small
nonriparian requirement associated with one permit that is due. The permit’s
nonriparian- mitigation needs are fully covered. The permit’s stream requirement
is currently covered with 10: 1 HQP assets, but the remaining restoration
requirement ( 146 stream restoration credits) is outstanding.
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 26
CU Action Plan:
The primary plan for this CU had been to utilize the Full Delivery Project ( FDP)
process to meet current and future stream needs. EEP had received one FDP
project that was not accepted during the fourth quarter. Consequently, EEP
identified the EEP Watershed Planning and Project Implementation staff to
procure the remaining stream mitigation needs. EEP has already secured
sufficient riparian- and nonriparian- wetland mitigation sufficient to offset all
projected riparian and nonriparian mitigation needs for the seven- year TIP, and
has ceased procurement for additional riparian and nonriparian mitigation until
new mitigation needs are identified. For the current and future coastal- marsh
mitigation needs, EEP proposed the procurement and restoration of the Collins
Tract, a very large and rare potential coastal- marsh restoration project located in
Pasquotank 03010205, but only a few miles from the border of the Tar- Pamlico
03020105 and Pasquotank 03010205 CU boundary. EEP has requested of the
regulatory agencies that the service area for the project contain both CUs due
both to its location and the projection that nearly all impacts are expected to occur
at the boundary between the two CUs. The agencies submitted comments to the
proposed mitigation tract during the third quarter. Some agencies commented
that the Collins Tract may be considered creation rather than restoration.
Additionally, during the fourth quarter, the forecasted coastal- marsh need
( approximately 14.86 total coastal- marsh credits) in this CU is currently in
question as NCDOT may be required to produce on- site mitigation rather than
procure off- site mitigation through the EEP.
At this time, procurement of MOA mitigation needs for stream and coastal marsh
is on hold pending the Tri- Party surplus- assets mitigation discussions. The Tar
Pamlico river basin has multiple other CUs that contain surplus mitigation.
Procurement of new mitigation sites within this CU are on hold until options to
utilize these other assets are exhausted Since the coastal marsh needs within the
MOU program were also intended to be met with portions of the Collins Tract,
meeting this requirement is also delayed.
Note: The Bonner Bridge project is a future MOA projected impact. The PACG-TC
is looking at coastal issues that may affect this CU in the future. The Bonner
Bridge spans both Tar- Pamlico 03020105 and Pasquotank 03010205 CUs.
WHITE OAK 03030001
Outstanding Mitigation Required
Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent
Streams 0 0
Riparian 0 0
Non- Riparian 0.2 0.2
Coastal Marsh 0 0
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 27
Background:
EEP currently has significant amounts of unused nonriparian mitigation credits in
White Oak 03030001 originating from the Hoffman Forest Mitigation Bank.
Unfortunately, the Hoffman Forest Mitigation Bank has a service area restricted
to Onslow County impacts.
CU Action Plan:
EEP has assigned the Watershed Planning and Project Implementation group to
identify and acquire one nonriparian credit. To address projected future needs,
the Watershed Planning and Project Implementation already identified two
projects representing 3,000 stream credits and five riparian credits and is looking
for additional projects that would add an extra 5.39 riparian credits. However,
due to the surplus- asset issue, procurement of wetland- and stream- mitigation
sites for the MOA program is on hold until further notice for the White Oak river
basin.
The White Oak LWP is also examining potential alternative, nontraditional forms
of mitigation that may be appropriate for this watershed.
YADKIN 03040105
Outstanding Mitigation Required
Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent
Streams 0 0
Riparian 4.27 0
Non- Riparian 0 0
Coastal Marsh 0 0
Background:
Yadkin 03040105 is similar in some ways to Catawba 03050103. Yadkin
03040105 does not have many wetlands- restoration opportunities present within
the CU. It is also experiencing some of the same development pressures that are
present in the lower Catawba. Yadkin 03040105 includes portions of Charlotte,
Huntersville, Mooresville, Davidson, Concord, Kannapolis, Monroe, Mint Hill
and other smaller towns. It should be considered a CU of concern for future
wetlands- restoration efforts. Yadkin 0304105 is different than the lower Catawba
in that it has more rural landscape remaining within the watershed and is larger.
EEP has invested heavily in local watershed planning in the Yadkin 0304105 and
expects to generate both stream and wetlands projects from these endeavors in the
future. Due to the magnitude of mitigation needs projected in this CU, EEP has
also used the full- delivery process to secure mitigation.
CU Action Plan:
Historically, the action plan in this CU included the significant use of the FDP
program to secure stream and wetland mitigation needs due to the extreme
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 28
magnitude of need. These efforts have been very successful in generating stream
restoration, but not wetland restoration. The most recent RFP had submittals
containing five riparian wetland credits and 0.5 nonriparian credits that were not
awarded due to high costs.
To develop mitigation assets in Yadkin 05, EEP is using a multi- pronged
approach. EEP has expanded the Rocky River LWP to Phase IV; plans to acquire
and implement existing Tier II and III projects; identify and implement using the
Design- Bid- Build DBB) process at least five additional stream- restoration
projects, and two riparian- wetland projects; and maximize use of existing HQP
credits. A LWP is being initiated in the Goose Creek watershed in partnership
with resource agencies to generate mitigation opportunities that will also address
endangered- species issues. The EEP Monitoring Section is also investigating
whether the Cato project produced nonriparian or riparian credits as a component
of the priority one stream- restoration project. Finally, EEP plans to issue another
full- delivery RFP for the CU. The full- delivery RFP release date is on hold
pending the results of the success of acquiring identified DBB stream and wetland
projects. The proposal to issue another RFP has also been placed on hold due to
the pending Tri- Party surplus- assets discussions. Due to the surplus- asset issue,
procurement of wetland- only mitigation sites for the MOA program is on hold
until further notice for the Yadkin River Basin.
SECTION VII:
FUTURE CONFORMANCE
As noted throughout the report, many mitigation procurement initiatives have
been placed on hold pending the ongoing discussions between the Tri- Party
agencies on the issue of surplus assets. These procurement holds may result in
future nonconformance with the terms of the MOA or MOU permit requirements.
Consequently, permit compliance is expected to continue to drop slightly while
these discussions are ongoing and new permit requirements come online.
However, the magnitude of this drop is moderated by the amount of advanced
mitigation already completed for Year 5 and 6 projected mitigation needs. EEP is
working closely with the Tri- Party agencies to identify the appropriate course of
action regarding mitigation procurement and utilization of existing assets to meet
existing and future needs. For the most part, these procurement holds will only
affect the MOA mitigation program. Procurement of mitigation for the MOU
mitigation program will continue. Both programs are affected by the delays
where RFPs have been placed on hold or a single project had been identified to
meet MOU and MOA mitigation program needs.
Additionally, in March 2007 Congress re- authorized the USACE’s nationwide
permit authority. USACE initiated a public- review process for revisions to its
general permit conditions, causing a three- month hiatus in USACE’s permit
processing. This delay has affected six EEP projects, some of which were
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 29
delayed while the public- review process ran its course. Others were held by EEP,
pending the outcome of the public- review process.
EEP is expediting other steps in the project- permitting and construction process
for these six projects, and is hopeful that ultimately the projects will experience
only small delays in final implementation. However, it is possible that the
program will miss season- specific planting windows resulting in delayed
mitigation and temporary non- conformance in these CUs in the 2008 – 2009
time frame.
The projects affected by the permitting delays were:
Mitigation assets estimated as of June 30,
2007. All are subject to change.
Project name CU
Stream Wetlands Buffer
Adkins Branch
( phase 11)
Neuse 03020202 10,137 feet 21.55 acres
Brock Neuse 03020204 1,850 feet 1.65 acres 6.88 acres
Johnson- Dale Neuse 03020203 1,500 feet 6 acres
Oakley Crossroads Tar- Pam 03020103 3,800 feet 6.30 acres 20.9 acres
Stallings Neuse 03020204 4,476 feet 34 acres 43.95 acres
Tate Farm New River 05050001 30,285 feet 11.60 acres
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 30
Appendix A: EEP Gross Asset List of Tier 1 Stream and Wetland Restoration, Enhancement, Creation, and Preservation Sites Alphabetically ( High Quality Preservation Sites are not listed in table below).
GIS ID
Project Name
Tier
River Basin
8- digit CU
Stream Restoration
Stream Enhancment I
Stream Enhancement II
Stream Preservation
Riparian Restoration
Riparian Creation
Riparian Enhancement
Riparian Preservation
Nonriparian Restoration
Nonriparian Creation
Nonriparian Enhancement
Nonriparian Preservation
Coastal Marsh
Restoration
Coastal Marsh Creation
Coastal Marsh
Enhancement
Coastal Marsh
Preservation
Stream Buffer
92546 601 North Property 1 YADKIN 03040105 3,000
92545 601 West Property 1 YADKIN 03040105 4,500
9 Abbott 1 NEUSE 03020201 584
6 ABC 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020104 2,375 101.63 9.24 27.57 10.90
92488 Acre Swamp Creek 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020104 7,000 30.00 16.10
92244 Adam's Creek Sea Gate Woods 1 n/ a NEUSE 03020204 122.00
7 Adkins Branch ( Phase II) 1 NEUSE 03020202 10,137 21.55
10 Afton Run 1 YADKIN 03040105 261
92526 Anderson Swamp 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020102 12.00 7.00
92487 Armstrong Property 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020104 2,000 20.00 4.50
17 Back Creek 1 YADKIN 03040105 2,167 1,480 0.30 3.50
92666 Badin Inn 1 YADKIN 03040104 4,050
19 Bailey Fork ( EBX) ( 16- D04006) 1 CATAWBA 03050101 6,017 9,765 11.80 5.30 12.60
20 Bailey Fork II ( WRC) ( 16- D04006) 1 CATAWBA 03050101 5,500 9.50
21 Ballance Farm 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 196.27 49.65 25.35 50.00
22 Barbara Squires Site 1 CAPE FEAR 03030005
24 Beamon's Run 1 n/ a NEUSE 03020203
26 Bear Creek ( Phillips Tract) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 4,143
27 Bear Swamp Creek 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020101 1,460 2.40
28 Beaver Creek 1 YADKIN 03040101 4,266
92217 Beaverdam Creek 1 CATAWBA 03050101 12,427 567 2,603
92586 Beaverdam Creek and Trib ( Parker Site) 1 YADKIN 03040105 2,933
92530 Beaverdam Swamp 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 10,200 9.00
29 Benbow Park 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 1,122 780
32 Benson Grove 1 NEUSE 03020201
33 Bethel Church 1 YADKIN 03040101
92532 Big Cedar Creek 1 YADKIN 03040105 11,088 1,090 580
739 Big Harris Creek I 1 BROAD 03050105 2,500 500
92492 Big Harris Creek II 1 BROAD 03050105 6,000 5,000 2,000 2.00
92715 Big Warrior & Little Warrior Creek 1 YADKIN 03040101 50
36 Billy's Creek 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020101 1,901 200 2.60
38 Bishop Road ( 1 mi to CU 05) 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020104 1.00 61.60 112.60 521.00 3.30
92516 Blockhouse Creek 1 BROAD 03050105 4,450 1,410 800 5.00
92210 Blounts Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 8,000
40 Blue Mitigation Site 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 4,200 112.35
731 Bogue Sound ( Weeks Property) 1 WHITE OAK 03020106 0.18
439 Bold Run Creek 1 NEUSE 03020201 1,454 0 176 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 27.10
44 Bowman Site 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 1,500 200 2.34
46 Branson Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 2,200
47 Briles 1 YADKIN 03040103 1,446 1,182 1.00
92333 Brock 1 NEUSE 03020204 - 573 1.65 6.88
49 Brock Mill Pond 1 NEUSE 03020204 3,400 109.00
52 Brown Bark Park 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 775 2,059
53 Brown Branch 1 CATAWBA 03050101 5,107 120
92591 Brown Branch ( Willowbrook Park) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 350 2,850
92207 Brown Farm 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 24.58 3.32
92517 Brown Marsh Swamp 1 LUMBER 03040204 5,000 5.00
1 of 9 Updated 9/ 30/ 07
Appendix A: EEP Gross Asset List of Tier 1 Stream and Wetland Restoration, Enhancement, Creation, and Preservation Sites Alphabetically ( High Quality Preservation Sites are not listed in table below).
GIS ID
Project Name
Tier
River Basin
8- digit CU
Stream Restoration
Stream Enhancment I
Stream Enhancement II
Stream Preservation
Riparian Restoration
Riparian Creation
Riparian Enhancement
Riparian Preservation
Nonriparian Restoration
Nonriparian Creation
Nonriparian Enhancement
Nonriparian Preservation
Coastal Marsh
Restoration
Coastal Marsh Creation
Coastal Marsh
Enhancement
Coastal Marsh
Preservation
Stream Buffer
54 Brush Creek 1 NEW 05050001 1,350 490 1,750
55 Brushy Fork 1 YADKIN 03040101 4,400 3,000
743 Bryan Blvd/ Oakridge 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 0.00
92603 Buffalo Creek 1 NEUSE 03020201 6,100
56 Bugaboo Creek 1 YADKIN 03040101 6,230
57 Bull Farm 1 CAPE FEAR 03030006 2.18
58 Burnt Mill Creek 1 n/ a CAPE FEAR 03030007 0.80
60 Bush Island 1 LUMBER 03040203 300.00
63 Caldwell Station/ Foley/ EcoPark 1 CATAWBA 03050101 3,600 420 1.60 5.00
65 Camp Branch @ Bishop Site 1 YADKIN 03040105 1,900 1,190 4,400 7,000 1.00 7.00
66 Camp Lejune USMC 1 WHITE OAK 03030001
69 Cane Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 2,277 6.90
92325 Cane Creek 1 ROANOKE 03010104 12,720 1,232 3,499 463
92521 Cane Creek ( FD) 1 BROAD 03050105 4,470 4,860 1,670 4.40 5.00
92268 Carbonton Dam 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 90,484
70 Casey Tract 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205
71 Cat Creek 1 LITTLE TENNESSEE 06010202 4,358 1,082 1,490 6.00
72 Cato 1 YADKIN 03040105 2,295
73 Caviness 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 937 11.00
77 Chapel Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 1,000 400
79 Charles Creek 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 1.16 0.60
87 Chavis Park 1 NEUSE 03020201 2,210 2.30
90 City Pond 1 YADKIN 03040201 10,667
91 Clayhill Farm 1 WHITE OAK 03020106 9,599 2,010 21.60 1.80 3.90 79.90 52.00 110.50
92 Clear Creek 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 1,200
93 Cleghorn Creek ( 16- D04010) 1 BROAD 03050105 5,167
94 Coddle Creek Tributary ( Indian Run) 1 YADKIN 03040105 1,840 1,000 1,190
742 Collington Cut 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205
92205 Collins Site 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 9,786 1,070 750
96 Company Swamp 1 ROANOKE 03010107 557.43
92226 Conoconnara Swamp 1 ROANOKE 03010107 5,000 69.00 8.00 71.00
97 Corbett Tract 1 Lumber 03040207 0.00
101 Cox Property 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020104 0.00
99 Cox Site 1 NEUSE 03020201 7,263 285 25.88 16.90
105 Cross Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 2,400
92329 Crowns West 1 WHITE OAK 03030001 3,800
92547 Cutatwhiskie creek 1 CHOWAN 03010204 2,818 2,786 12.30
92269 Daniels Farm # 1 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020101 31.70
92229 Daniels Farm # 2 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020101 13.70 4.50 10.30 0.70 0.70 0.11
92543 Davis Branch 1 YADKIN 03040105 5,025
110 Deaton 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 255 13.70
117 Dismal Swamp 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 15.46 20.80 252.78 91.00
92533 Dog Bite Creek 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010108 2,410 1,235 80
119 Dowd Dairy 1 CAPE FEAR 03030005 4.85 545.33
92544 Duke Swamp 1 CHOWAN 03010203 5,000 15.00
92350 Dula Thorofare @ Bishop Site 1 YADKIN 03040104 2,568 2,900 3,200 5.60 0.94 3.20
121 Dutchman's Creek 1 NEUSE 03020201
2 of 9 Updated 9/ 30/ 07
Appendix A: EEP Gross Asset List of Tier 1 Stream and Wetland Restoration, Enhancement, Creation, and Preservation Sites Alphabetically ( High Quality Preservation Sites are not listed in table below).
GIS ID
Project Name
Tier
River Basin
8- digit CU
Stream Restoration
Stream Enhancment I
Stream Enhancement II
Stream Preservation
Riparian Restoration
Riparian Creation
Riparian Enhancement
Riparian Preservation
Nonriparian Restoration
Nonriparian Creation
Nonriparian Enhancement
Nonriparian Preservation
Coastal Marsh
Restoration
Coastal Marsh Creation
Coastal Marsh
Enhancement
Coastal Marsh
Preservation
Stream Buffer
122 Dye Branch I Stormwater BMP 1 n/ a YADKIN 03040105
92255 Dye Branch II Stream Restoration 1 YADKIN 03040105 3,000
123 East Tarboro Canal 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020103 2,989 1,876 8.27
125 Elizabeth City State BMP 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 0
92665 Elk Branch 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010108 3,075 2,540
126 Elk Shoals RFP* 1 CATAWBA 03050101 4,813 563 5.30
127 Ellerbee Creek 1 NEUSE 03020201 6,279 12.00
92520 Ellington Branch 1 ROANOKE 03010106 5,000
128 Ephemeral Pool 1 LUMBER 03040203
92552 Farrar Dairy 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 11,531 800 150 33.30 39.90 43.20
92185 Five Mile Branch 1 YADKIN 03040102 17,595 4.00 4.00
138 Fletcher- Meritor site 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 4,000 10.00
440 Flintrock Farm 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 3,000 30.00
92486 Floogie Site 1 ROANOKE 03010107 10,251 25.00
139 Forest Hills 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 2,960
92609 Four Mile Creek - DBB 1 CATAWBA 03050103 2,223
141 Freedom Park 1 CATAWBA 03050103 4,400
142 Friedburg Marsh 1 Yadkin 03040101
92228 Gatlin Swamp 1 ROANOKE 03010107 125.00
143 Gibson Pond 1 Yadkin 03040201 36.70
144 Gillespie Golf Course 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 2,709 3,086
854 Glade Creek 1 NEW 05050001 2,705 125 813 0.33
92343 Glade Creek II 1 NEW 05050001 2,500 1.00 1.50
92206 Glen Raven 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 3,290 700
145 Goldsboro Housing Authority 1 NEUSE 03020201 2,100 3.54
147 Goose Creek 1 NEUSE 03020201 1,800 3.00
92710 Goose Creek ( Earl Haigler) 1 YADKIN 03040105
92709 Goose Creek ( Greene site) 1 YADKIN 03040105 0
148 Goshen Swamp 1 CAPE FEAR 03030007 0.00
92219 Gray Farm 1 CATAWBA 03050101 7,610 15.70
671 Greenbriar Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 3,028 2,896 4,000 7.64 7.50
153 Gregory 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020102 6,500 75.00
155 Grimesland ( Phase II) 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020103 48.80
156 Grimesland Site ( Phase I) 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020103 7.80 348.00
158 Grove Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030007 6.00 10.20 352.00 3.90 7.60
716 Gurley 1 NEUSE 03020203 0
162 Hall Branch 1 YADKIN 03040201 2,000 2.50
163 Hammock's State Park 1 WHITE OAK 03020106 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
165 Hanging Rock Creek ( A3) 1 WATAUGA 06010103 2,767 279
92230 Harrell Site 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020101 6,987 15.00 18.90
167 Haw Branch ( 16- D04015) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030007 10,000 25.00
92316 Haw River Bouchard 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 30.00
92238 Haw River Swamp I 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 12.00
168 Haw River Swamp II ( 16- D04011) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 14.70 2.50 18.00
169 Haw River Tract 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 80.00
719 Haw's Run 1 CAPE FEAR 03030007 6.72 25.00 171.00 49.36 99.00 11.00
170 Heath Dairy Road 1 YADKIN 03040103 8,700 2,900 700
3 of 9 Updated 9/ 30/ 07
Appendix A: EEP Gross Asset List of Tier 1 Stream and Wetland Restoration, Enhancement, Creation, and Preservation Sites Alphabetically ( High Quality Preservation Sites are not listed in table below).
GIS ID
Project Name
Tier
River Basin
8- digit CU
Stream Restoration
Stream Enhancment I
Stream Enhancement II
Stream Preservation
Riparian Restoration
Riparian Creation
Riparian Enhancement
Riparian Preservation
Nonriparian Restoration
Nonriparian Creation
Nonriparian Enhancement
Nonriparian Preservation
Coastal Marsh
Restoration
Coastal Marsh Creation
Coastal Marsh
Enhancement
Coastal Marsh
Preservation
Stream Buffer
172 Helms 1 YADKIN 03040105 1,400 0.40
175 High Vista 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 1,500 2,300
176 Hillcrest Bay ( 16- D04011) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 15.00
177 Hillsdale Park 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 5,302 138
92523 Holly Grove 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 13,350 5,940
180 Hominy Swamp Creek 1 NEUSE 03020203 2,232 2.60
92251 Hoppers Creek - Melton Farm 1 CATAWBA 03050101 3,500 800 1.00
182 Horsepen Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 1.77
183 Howell Woods 1 NEUSE 03020201 5,251 34.00 4.00 64.00 38.00 5.50
184 Huskanaw Swamp 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020103 23.60
185 Indian Creek 1 CATAWBA 03050102 0
192 Irwin Creek Whitehurst Road 1 CATAWBA 03050103 1,500 1.50 1.04
194 Jacksonville Country Club 1 WHITE OAK 03030001 3,272 376
92550 Jarmans Oak 1 WHITE OAK 03030001 6,418 555 11.00 2.00
751
Jenny's Gut ( Perquimans County High
School) 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 2,500
197 Johnson Site ( Hunting Creek) 1 YADKIN 03040102 2,200
661
Johnson- Dale Stream Restoration ( Payne
Dale) 1 NEUSE 03020203 1,500 6.00
198 Jones Creek ( 16- D04020) 1 YADKIN 03040201 3,068 5,150 25.00 2.70
92614 Jordan Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 5,000
199 Jumping Run Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 4,480 67.00
200 Jumping Run Creek 1 WHITE OAK 03020106 3.00
201 Juniper Bay 1 LUMBER 03040203 590.08
204 Ken- Cox ( Millstone Creek) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 3,300 2.00 4.55
205 Kentwood Park 1 NEUSE 03020201 1,070 350 2.90
206 Key Branch 1 YADKIN 03040104 36.80 3.60
208 Kings Creek 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 2,300
209 Knobs Creek 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 19.00
210 La Grange 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 2.00 4.00
212 Lake Wheeler 1 NEUSE 03020201 0.00
92707 Laxon Creek( Racey site) 1 WATAUGA 06010103 1,160
215 Lengyel 1 NEUSE 03020204 5.64 4.70
733 Lewis Creek 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 2,000
219 Lick Creek ( 16- D04011) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 9,500
92372 Little Alamance Creek ( Burlington Park) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 2,850
221 Little Beaver Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 5,298 4.75 0.97
627 Little Contentnea Creek ( Farmville C. C.) 1 NEUSE 03020203 980 1,330 6.70
224 Little Grassy Creek 1 ROANOKE 03010102 5,000 12,300
92651 Little Ivy Creek ( Barnhill Site) 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 1,200
92192 Little Lick Creek 1 NEUSE 03020201 2,750 300 1.40 1.53 1.00 5.24
225 Little McQueen 1 LUMBER 03040203 0.00
856 Little Pine Creek II 1 NEW 05050001 2,700 4.00
226 Little River 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 4,400 5.00 50.00 42.00
228 Little Sugar Creek I 1 CATAWBA 03050103 0.00
749 Little Troublesome 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 2,188 2,754 1.90 4.50
92534 Little White Oak Creek 1 BROAD 03050105 18,200
4 of 9 Updated 9/ 30/ 07
Appendix A: EEP Gross Asset List of Tier 1 Stream and Wetland Restoration, Enhancement, Creation, and Preservation Sites Alphabetically ( High Quality Preservation Sites are not listed in table below).
GIS ID
Project Name
Tier
River Basin
8- digit CU
Stream Restoration
Stream Enhancment I
Stream Enhancement II
Stream Preservation
Riparian Restoration
Riparian Creation
Riparian Enhancement
Riparian Preservation
Nonriparian Restoration
Nonriparian Creation
Nonriparian Enhancement
Nonriparian Preservation
Coastal Marsh
Restoration
Coastal Marsh Creation
Coastal Marsh
Enhancement
Coastal Marsh
Preservation
Stream Buffer
92327 Lloyd Site 1 WHITE OAK 03030001 4,750 3.30 3.10
92515 Logan Creek 1 SAVANNAH 03060101 3,310 1,600 0 3,115 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
231 Long Creek 1 CATAWBA 03050101 1.64
233 Long Swamp 1 Lumber 03040203 0.00
234 Louisburg ( UT to Tar River) 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020101 1,937 3.05
236 Lowell Mill ( 16- D04008) 1 NEUSE 03020201 34,990
237 Lower Creek 1 CATAWBA 03050101 3,500
239 Mallard Creek 1 YADKIN 03040105
239 Mallard Creek 1 CATAWBA 03050103 0.00
715 Mann's Harbor 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205
92248 Mark's Creek TESC 1 NEUSE 03020201 3,693 17.90
241 Mary's Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 2,096 5.40
718 Mashoe's Road 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 29.32 130.94
92328 Mason Farm 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020105 16.00 20.00
443 McCain Property 1 YADKIN 03040103 2,445
242 McDonald's Pond 1 YADKIN 03040201 2,969 770 4,410 17.70 4.20 19.00
92604 McGowan Creek 1 NEUSE 03020201 30.80
243 McIntyre Creek @ Hornets Nest Park 1 CATAWBA 03050101 4,800 1.50 17.07
244 McIntyre Property 1 CAPE FEAR 03030005 12.30 9.02 85.76
92573 McKee Creek 1 YADKIN 03040105 1,650 4,500
245 McLeansville 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 6.00
92351 Meadowbranch ( Fivemile Branch) 1 LUMBER 03040203 25.00 30.00
92706 Meat Camp Creek ( Miller site) 1 WATAUGA 06010103 652
247 Meredell Farm Site 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 3,865 4,704 5,136 11.80
92703 Middle Fork Creek ( Phillips/ Willis) 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 4,480
250 Mildred Woods 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020103 128.50 8.00
251 Mill Branch 1 LUMBER 03040206 3,282 1,750 0.25 0.44 35.80 1.50
253 Mill Creek ( formerly Uwharrie Heritage) 1 YADKIN 03040103 3,598 1,912 14,675 3.00
255 Mineral Springs Branch ( Burnt Mill Creek) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030007 1,190 1,350
256 Mocassin Creek 1 NEUSE 03020203 311 0.38 4.93 43.21 3.00
92227 Modlin Site 1 ROANOKE 03010107 40.00
725 Moore Property 1 NEUSE 03020201 7.10 30.90 4.90 6.60
92314 Mooresville School Site - Rocky River 1 YADKIN 03040105 3,430 1.00
92527 Morgan Creek 1 BROAD 03050105 8,171 5,216 4,309
92240 Morgan Creek ( Bolin Stewardship Tract) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 3,575
92531 Morgan Creek ( French Broad) 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010106 4,857 715 5.00
258 Morgan Creek Floodplain 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 19.00
260 Mud Creek 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 15.60
737 Muddy Creek ( Randolph/ Duncan Properties) 1 CATAWBA 03050101 3,500
261 Naked Creek 1 YADKIN 03040101 3,000
92330 New Light Creek ( NCDOT) 1 NEUSE 03020201
92497 Newfound Creek 1 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 5,000 6,600 800
441 Nicholls Farm ( Troublesome Creek) 1 CHOWAN 03010203 1,700 3,300 15.00 5.00 10.00
92611 North Muddy Creek 1 CATAWBA 03050101 5,014 10.50 1.25 4.30 2.40
271 North River 1 n/ a WHITE OAK 03020106 250.00
5 of 9 Updated 9/ 30/ 07
Appendix A: EEP Gross Asset List of Tier 1 Stream and Wetland Restoration, Enhancement, Creation, and Preservation Sites Alphabetically ( High Quality Preservation Sites are not listed in table below).
GIS ID
Project Name
Tier
River Basin
8- digit CU
Stream Restoration
Stream Enhancment I
Stream Enhancement II
Stream Preservation
Riparian Restoration
Riparian Creation
Riparian Enhancement
Riparian Preservation
Nonriparian Restoration
Nonriparian Creation
Nonriparian Enhancement
Nonriparian Preservation
Coastal Marsh
Restoration
Coastal Marsh Creation
Coastal Marsh
Enhancement
Coastal Marsh
Preservation
Stream Buffer
272 Northgate Park ( Ellerbe) 1 NEUSE 03020201 1,800 5.00
273 Oakley Crossroads 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020103 3,800 2.94 2.25 1.11 20.90
274 Oakwood Cemetary 1 NEUSE 03020201 1,300
92708 Obids Creek ( Wild Site) 1 NEW 05050001 1,819
275 Open Springs 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 4,520 4.70
92700 Paint Fork Creek( Brigmon Site) 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 5,175
92702 Paint Fork Creek( Fosson) 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 1,700
276 Paschal GC ( Richland Ck) 1 NEUSE 03020201 2,900 5.14
279 Payne Dairy 1 CATAWBA 03050101 5,177 470 1,350 6.40 25.40
280 Pea Island 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205
92469 Peeler Creek 1 YADKIN 03040101 2,400 1,500 1,000
281 Pembroke Creek I 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205
282 Pembroke Creek II 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 - 0.09
283 Perry Property ( UT to Pembroke Creek) 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 4,400 17.00 6.00
1 Philips 1 NEUSE 03020201
92518 Pinch Gut Tributary 1 ROANOKE 03010103 10,000
92607 Plemmons- Kirkpatrick Spring Creek WRC 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 680
92549 Plum Creek 1 LUMBER 03040207 80.00
286 Pott Creek II 1 CATAWBA 03050102 10,054
92548 Powell Property 1 CHOWAN 03010203 3,310 70.00
289 Prestonwood G. C. 1 NEUSE 03020201 4,123 5.30
291 Price Park 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 1,776
292 Pridgen Flats 1 CAPE FEAR 03030006
293 Privateer Farms 1 CAPE FEAR 03030005 34,005 402.50 25.00
294 Purlear Creek 1 YADKIN 03040101 11,500 2.00 2.00
295 Purlear Creek II 1 YADKIN 03040101 2,620 1.05 0.30
92522 Puzzle Creek 1 BROAD 03050105 5,300
297 R- 2719 BA 1 NEUSE 03020202 0
92220 Reed's Creek 1 CATAWBA 03050101 4.20 2.20
301 Reedy Branch 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 3,150
303 Rich Fork FDP ( Bodenheimer- Parker) 1 YADKIN 03040103 3,000 20.00 2.00
304 Richland Creek 1 NEUSE 03020201 415
307 River Bend 1 ROANOKE 03010104 89.00 19.00
308 Rocky Branch 1 YADKIN 03040102 4,400 1.50
310 Rocky Branch ( NCSU) Phase I 1 NEUSE 03020201
311 Rocky Branch ( NCSU) Phase II 1 NEUSE 03020201
312 Roquist 1 ROANOKE 03010107 500 45.00 3,386.00
317 Rowan Branch 1 CAPE FEAR 03030006 600 10.00 67.00
92675 SALT ( Sandhill Area Land Trust) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 0
320 Sand Shoals 1 WHITE OAK 03020106
321 Sandy Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 5.68 2.90
322 Sandy Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 2,700 3.60
732 Sandy Mush ( Phase II) 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 32,320
325 Sawmill 1 NEUSE 03020204 0.28 - 1.08 0.18 0.24 0.81
92237 Second Creek Wetlands, Double Thumb 1 YADKIN 03040103 3.00
331 Seven Springs 1 NEUSE 03020202 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
92241 Sharpe Wetland Preservation 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 512 6.20
6 of 9 Updated 9/ 30/ 07
Appendix A: EEP Gross Asset List of Tier 1 Stream and Wetland Restoration, Enhancement, Creation, and Preservation Sites Alphabetically ( High Quality Preservation Sites are not listed in table below).
GIS ID
Project Name
Tier
River Basin
8- digit CU
Stream Restoration
Stream Enhancment I
Stream Enhancement II
Stream Preservation
Riparian Restoration
Riparian Creation
Riparian Enhancement
Riparian Preservation
Nonriparian Restoration
Nonriparian Creation
Nonriparian Enhancement
Nonriparian Preservation
Coastal Marsh
Restoration
Coastal Marsh Creation
Coastal Marsh
Enhancement
Coastal Marsh
Preservation
Stream Buffer
333 Sheperd's Tree 1 YADKIN 03040102 - 34 16.64 86.60 8.00
335 Silas Creek 1 YADKIN 03040101 782 3,662
336 Silver Creek ( 16- D04006) 1 CATAWBA 03050101 5,127 1,392 2,036 1,077 5.30
92218 Silver Creek- Conway 1 CATAWBA 03050101 4,520
92234 Simpson Wetland 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020104 30.00
92663 Sink Hole Creek 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010108 3,560 12,460 1,760
340 Sleepy Creek 1 NEUSE 03020202 96.40 39.20 380.00
341 Smith Creek Site 1 CAPE FEAR 03030007 0.00
343 Smith/ Austin Creek 1 NEUSE 03020201 6,178 3,982 794 32.00
344 Snow Creek 1 ROANOKE 03010103 3,850 855
345 South Buffalo Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 4.03 2.21
346 South Fork 1 CATAWBA 03050102 11,260
92701
South Fork Big Pine
Creek( Charles/ McGinnis) 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 1,100
347 South Fork Hopper ( 16- D04006) 1 CATAWBA 03050101 7,213 5.10 1.00 9.90
348 South Muddy Creek ( 16- D04006) 1 CATAWBA 03050101 12,573 2,653 7.30
349 Sparta Bog 1 NEW 05050001 11.90
351 Speight Branch 1 NEUSE 03020201 1.00 1.22 19.00
353 Spring Branch 1 CAPE FEAR 03030007 0.00
354 Spring Valley Park 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 0
357 Stallings 1 NEUSE 03020204 4,159 5.30 5.50 17.00 43.20
360 Starmount Forest CC 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 0
360 Starmount Park 1 Cape Fear 03030002
363 Stillhouse Creek 1 NEUSE 03020201 1,391 2.00
364 Stone Mountain 1 YADKIN 03040101 5,745 2,576 1.62
365 Stonebridge 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 6,240 8.60
92556 Stricker Branch 1 YADKIN 03040105 3,000
366 Sturgeon City ( Phase I) 1 WHITE OAK 03030001 0.35 2.69
367 Sturgeon City ( Phase II) 1 WHITE OAK 03030001 2.50
368 Suck Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 2,963 7.80
369 Sussman's Park 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002
370 Suther ( Dutch Buffalo Creek) 1 YADKIN 03040105 450 3,700 4,400 14.87 10.09 8.59
92249 Swift Creek Watershed Wetlands 1 NEUSE 03020201 65.20
92211 Tarlton Swamp 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 3,221 826 255 6.80 2.40
372 Tate Farm 1 NEW 05050001 1,880 1,202 18,288 16,204 2.36 4.52 0.02
92524 Thompson's Fork and Tributary 1 CATAWBA 03050101 5,000 4.30
92664 Three Mile Creek - Restoration Systems 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010108 6,764 210 5,865 1.30 2.00
379 Tick Creek ( Condoret Tract) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 3,011
92557 Timberlake ( Great Dismal Swamp) 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 5,000
92528 Tributary to Reedy Fork Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 6,800 500
388 Trout Cove Branch 1 HIWASSEE 06020002 1,876
389 Tucker Farm 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205
392 Tulula Bog 1 LITTLE TENNESSEE 06010204 2,269 1,101 52.36
394 Underhill 1 NEUSE 03020201
395 Upper UT to Cane Creek ( Picard) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 6,604
92347 UT Bear Creek ( Weaver/ McLeod property) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 4,877 0.39 11.00
7 of 9 Updated 9/ 30/ 07
Appendix A: EEP Gross Asset List of Tier 1 Stream and Wetland Restoration, Enhancement, Creation, and Preservation Sites Alphabetically ( High Quality Preservation Sites are not listed in table below).
GIS ID
Project Name
Tier
River Basin
8- digit CU
Stream Restoration
Stream Enhancment I
Stream Enhancement II
Stream Preservation
Riparian Restoration
Riparian Creation
Riparian Enhancement
Riparian Preservation
Nonriparian Restoration
Nonriparian Creation
Nonriparian Enhancement
Nonriparian Preservation
Coastal Marsh
Restoration
Coastal Marsh Creation
Coastal Marsh
Enhancement
Coastal Marsh
Preservation
Stream Buffer
152 UT Green Mill Run/ Greenville Country Club 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020103 814 3,979 0.90 3.30
92383 UT Rocky River - Harris Road Middle 1 YADKIN 03040105 2,180 2.00 2.00
92598 UT to Back Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 3,622
92596 UT to Bald Creek 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010108 1,500 1,250 2,000
397 UT to Barnes Creek ( HurleySite) 1 YADKIN 03040103 2,975 1,000 1.00 3.12
92719 UT to Bear Creek ( Phillips) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 694 1,070
857 UT to Crab Creek 1 NEW 05050001 3,908 2,669 8.80 0.40 1.50 10.90 0.00
434 UT to Crooked Creek/ Speas Property 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020101 2,267 210 2.80 10.80
92712 Ut to Goose Creek( Haigler & Rowell) 1 YADKIN 03040105
92711 Ut to Goose Creek( Haigler/ Price) 1 YADKIN 03040105
92713 Ut to Goose Creek( Sasser/ Carriker) 1 YADKIN 03040105
92714 Ut to Goose Creek( Williams/ Matlock) 1 YADKIN 03040105
92471 UT to Hauser Creek 1 YADKIN 03040101 2,300
747 UT to Haw River 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 10,150 1,000
371 UT to Hendricks Creek ( Tarboro Canal) 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020103 1,300 4.00
181 UT to Indian Creek ( Hoover) 1 CATAWBA 03050102 1,350 1,200
92345 UT to Jumping Run Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 3,000 70.00
92705 Ut to Laxon Creek ( Carp site) 1 WATAUGA 06010103 538
290 UT to Lilliput Creek ( Hog Branch Ponds) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030005 3,238 20.45 7.83 96.46 87.74
314 UT to Little Coharie Creek ( Roseboro Site) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030006 1,630 700
92704 Ut to Peak Creek ( Bare site) 1 NEW 05050001 2,183 0.00
402 UT to Rocky River ( Smith Tract) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 1,335 955 9.20
403 UT to Sandy Creek ( Williams Tract) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 2,590 3.57
435 UT to South Fork Creek ( Hadley- Newlin) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 6,000
405 UT to South Fork Creek ( Stephens) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 4,500
847 UT to Uwharrie 1 YADKIN 03040103 3,500 3,500 2.00 1.00
442 UT to West Fork of Deep River 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 1,500 3,500 6.89
860 UT to Zack's Fork 1 CATAWBA 03050101 1,500
407 Valley Fields Farm Site 1 YADKIN 03040103 9,500 300 8,730 5.00 3.00 4.00 4.00
409 Wake Forest C. C. 1 NEUSE 03020201 3,400 6.50
412 Warrior Creek 1 YADKIN 03040101 10,585 450
413 Watts Property 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 1,000 4.00 40.00
414 Wells Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 2,986 2,757
417 White Oak Creek 1 NEUSE 03020201 8.68 3.34 1.60 18.62
419 Whitehall Reserve 1 CATAWBA 03050103 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
420 Whitelace Ck* 1 NEUSE 03020202 3,693 2,208 7.70 13.00 2.40
421 Wiggins Mill 1 NEUSE 03020203 247 12.96 5.00
423 Wike Property ( Lyle Creek) 1 CATAWBA 03050101 2,326 800
92508 Wildcat Branch 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 6,500 26.00
92551 Wolf Pond 1 YADKIN 03040105 4,500
92555 Woodlawn Branch 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 5,000
92606 WRC Bowlin- Peak Creek 1 NEW 05050001 1,551
432 Zack's Fork Ck RFP* 1 CATAWBA 03050101 3,900
8 of 9 Updated 9/ 30/ 07
Appendix A: EEP Gross Asset List of Tier 1 Stream and Wetland Restoration, Enhancement, Creation, and Preservation Sites Alphabetically ( High Quality Preservation Sites are not listed in table below).
GIS ID
Project Name
Tier
River Basin
8- digit CU
Stream Restoration
Stream Enhancment I
Stream Enhancement II
Stream Preservation
Riparian Restoration
Riparian Creation
Riparian Enhancement
Riparian Preservation
Nonriparian Restoration
Nonriparian Creation
Nonriparian Enhancement
Nonriparian Preservation
Coastal Marsh
Restoration
Coastal Marsh Creation
Coastal Marsh
Enhancement
Coastal Marsh
Preservation
Stream Buffer
Mitigation Sites with Executed Mitigation Banking Instruments
23 Barra Farms I 1 CAPE FEAR 03030005 160.51
25 Bear Creek 1 NEUSE 03020202 88.00 34.00 300.00
103 Croatan Mitigation Bank ( Phase I) 1 NEUSE 03020204 92.00 311.60 1,026.90 108.00
104 Croatan Mitigation Bank ( Phase II) 1 NEUSE 03020204 49.60 91.60 37.80 1,094.90 956.90 253.00
106 Dale Tract 1 CAPE FEAR 03030005 126.30 17.90
111 Deep Creek ( Harding) 1 YADKIN 03040101 5,500 30.40 12.10
118
Dismal Swamp Full- Delivery ( aka Timberlake
Farm) 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 180.00 275.00
745 Eagle Brunswick 1 CAPE FEAR 03030005
133 Finley- McMillan 1 CAPE FEAR 03030007 0 398.00
135 Fisher River Mit. Bank ( Ring FDP) 1 YADKIN 03040101 2,376 25.50 8.10 0.91
151 Great Dismal Swamp 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 553.00
92259 Hoffman Forest Bank ( MOA) 1 WHITE OAK 03030001 38.00
92258 Hoffman Forest Bank ( MOU) 1 WHITE OAK 03030001 12.00
179 Homestead ( wetland) 1 YADKIN 03040102 5,500 14.60 42.20 2.80 5.50
264 Neu- Con MBI ( Alexander) 1 NEUSE 03020203 18.50 0.90 2.00
92642 Neu- Con MBI ( Casey- King) 1 NEUSE 03020202 25.00 0.00
265 Neu- Con MBI ( Marston) 1 NEUSE 03020204 6,416 30.00 8.60 128.50
263 Neu- Con MBI ( Nahunta) 1 NEUSE 03020203 10,670 97.50 0.50 11.50 0.40 31.50
92643 Neu- Con MBI ( Tull Wooten) 1 NEUSE 03020202 125.00 0.00
92644 Neu- Con MBI ( Valentine) 1 NEUSE 03020203 386.00 114.00
262 Neu- Con MBI ( Westbrook) 1 NEUSE 03020201 5,414 10.00 50.00 50.00 20.00
285 Pott Creek 1 CATAWBA 03050102 3,500 5.45 31.32 0.76 0.36
746 Rowel Branch 1 CAPE FEAR 03030005
730 Scuppernong River Mitigation Bank 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 11.35 19.00
9 of 9 Updated 9/ 30/ 07
Appendix B: Summary of EEP Gross Assets ( High Quality Preservation SItes are not listed in table below)
Gross Assets
Stream
Restoration
Stream
Enhancment I
Stream
Enhancement II
Stream
Preservation
Riparian
Restoration
Riparian Creation
Riparian
Enhancement
Riparian
Preservation
Nonriparian
Restoration
Nonriparian
Creation
Nonriparian
Enhancement
Nonriparian
Preservation
Coastal Marsh
Restoration
Coastal Marsh
Creation
Coastal Marsh
Enhancement
Coastal Marsh
Preservation
Stream Buffer
Broad 54,258 6,410 10,076 9,279 11.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03050105 Total 54,258 6,410 10,076 9,279 11.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 5,167 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 49,091 6,410 10,076 9,279 11.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
Cape Fear 299,819 38,058 32,010 52,704 749.77 16.20 152.99 1,015.45 910.23 0.00 227.14 496.74 9.02 0.00 85.76 0.00 114.9
03030001 Located in White Oak
03030002 Total 71,010 26,775 23,264 19,463 84.43 6.00 8.69 170.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.3
MOU 38,536 20,005 16,074 12,575 35.05 0.00 3.47 158.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.3
MOA 32,474 6,770 7,190 6,888 49.38 6.00 5.22 12.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03030003 Total 132,214 9,757 6,596 9,136 6.07 0.00 2.00 10.54 2.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 102.6
MOU 39,809 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.8
MOA 92,405 9,757 6,596 9,136 6.07 0.00 2.00 10.54 2.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 94.8
03030004 Total 46,532 826 800 23,505 191.10 0.00 92.30 223.55 15.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 12,301 826 0 12,655 87.80 0.00 52.40 42.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 34,231 0 800 10,850 103.30 0.00 39.90 181.55 15.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03030005 Total 37,243 0 0 0 419.65 0.00 25.00 20.45 679.46 0.00 114.36 87.74 9.02 0.00 85.76 0.00 0.0
MOU 3,238 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.45 7.83 0.00 96.46 87.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 34,005 0 0 0 419.65 0.00 25.00 0.00 671.63 0.00 17.90 0.00 9.02 0.00 85.76 0.00 0.0
03030006 Total 1,630 700 0 600 10.00 0.00 0.00 67.00 160.51 0.00 2.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 1,630 700 0 600 10.00 0.00 0.00 67.00 160.51 0.00 2.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03030007 Total 11,190 0 1,350 0 38.52 10.20 25.00 523.00 53.26 0.00 106.60 409.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 11,190 0 1,350 0 25.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 0 0 0 0 12.72 10.20 25.00 523.00 53.26 0.00 106.60 409.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
Catawba 145,511 8,765 14,071 4,480 41.29 34.32 15.51 11.06 2.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 113.4
03050101 Total 112,724 6,065 14,071 4,480 35.84 1.50 14.75 10.70 2.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 112.4
MOU 78,153 5,498 14,071 1,877 23.70 1.50 13.50 6.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 92.4
MOA 34,571 567 0 2,603 12.14 0.00 1.25 4.30 2.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.0
03050102 Total 26,164 1,200 0 0 5.45 31.32 0.76 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 26,164 1,200 0 0 5.45 31.32 0.76 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03050103 Total 6,623 1,500 0 0 0.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.0
MOU 6,623 1,500 0 0 0.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.0
MOA 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
Chowan 11,128 1,700 0 6,086 97.30 0.00 0.00 15.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03010203 Total 8,310 1,700 0 3,300 85.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 8,310 1,700 0 3,300 85.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03010201 Total 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03010202 Total 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03010204 Total 2,818 0 0 2,786 12.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 2,818 0 0 2,786 12.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
French Broad 84,821 25,135 2,340 10,340 16.30 0.00 17.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
River Basin
Cataloging
Unit
1 of 4 Updated 9/ 30/ 07
Appendix B: Summary of EEP Gross Assets ( High Quality Preservation SItes are not listed in table below)
Gross Assets
Stream
Restoration
Stream
Enhancment I
Stream
Enhancement II
Stream
Preservation
Riparian
Restoration
Riparian Creation
Riparian
Enhancement
Riparian
Preservation
Nonriparian
Restoration
Nonriparian
Creation
Nonriparian
Enhancement
Nonriparian
Preservation
Coastal Marsh
Restoration
Coastal Marsh
Creation
Coastal Marsh
Enhancement
Coastal Marsh
Preservation
Stream Buffer
River Basin
Cataloging
Unit
06010105 Total 62,655 8,900 800 0 10.00 0.00 15.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 9,000 2,300 0 0 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 53,655 6,600 800 0 0.00 0.00 15.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
06010106 Total 4,857 0 0 715 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 4,857 0 0 715 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
06010108 Total 17,309 16,235 1,540 9,625 1.30 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 17,309 16,235 1,540 9,625 1.30 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
Hiwassee 1,876 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
06020002 Total 1,876 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 1,876 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
06020003 Total 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
Little Tennessee 6,627 1,082 1,490 1,101 58.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
06010202 Total 4,358 1,082 1,490 0 6.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 4,358 1,082 1,490 0 6.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
06010203 Total 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
06010204 Total 2,269 0 0 1,101 52.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 2,269 0 0 1,101 52.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
Lumber 8,282 0 0 1,750 30.00 0.25 30.44 35.80 670.08 0.00 0.00 301.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03040203 Total 0 0 0 0 25.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 590.08 0.00 0.00 300.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 0 0 0 0 25.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 590.08 0.00 0.00 300.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03040204 Total 5,000 0 0 0 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 5,000 0 0 0 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03040206 Total 3,282 0 0 1,750 0.00 0.25 0.44 35.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 3,282 0 0 1,750 0.00 0.25 0.44 35.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03040207 Total 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 80.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 80.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
Neuse 117,157 14,405 10,306 13,193 474.90 8.34 269.43 1,734.56 1,560.30 5.80 1,984.20 777.15 5.64 - 1.08 0.18 4.94 217.3
03020201 Total 82,005 7,882 8,671 9,793 87.06 8.34 66.82 241.05 98.80 4.90 0.00 20.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 124.1
MOU 38,733 7,882 8,671 6,100 37.16 4.00 64.00 135.53 1.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 117.5
MOA 43,273 0 0 3,693 49.90 4.34 2.82 105.52 97.20 4.90 0.00 20.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.6
03020202 Total 10,137 3,693 2,208 0 192.10 0.00 86.20 680.00 25.00 0.00 0.00 125.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.0
MOU 0 3,693 2,208 0 7.70 0.00 13.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.4
MOA 10,137 0 0 0 184.40 0.00 73.20 680.00 25.00 0.00 0.00 125.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 21.6
03020203 Total 14,440 2,830 0 0 110.84 0.00 10.43 429.21 30.00 0.90 0.40 147.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18.3
MOU 2,232 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.6
2 of 4 Updated 9/ 30/ 07
Appendix B: Summary of EEP Gross Assets ( High Quality Preservation SItes are not listed in table below)
Gross Assets
Stream
Restoration
Stream
Enhancment I
Stream
Enhancement II
Stream
Preservation
Riparian
Restoration
Riparian Creation
Riparian
Enhancement
Riparian
Preservation
Nonriparian
Restoration
Nonriparian
Creation
Nonriparian
Enhancement
Nonriparian
Preservation
Coastal Marsh
Restoration
Coastal Marsh
Creation
Coastal Marsh
Enhancement
Coastal Marsh
Preservation
Stream Buffer
River Basin
Cataloging
Unit
MOA 12,208 2,830 0 0 110.84 0.00 10.43 429.21 30.00 0.90 0.40 147.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.7
03020204 Total 10,575 0 - 573 3,400 84.90 0.00 105.98 384.30 1,406.50 0.00 1,983.80 484.65 5.64 - 1.08 0.18 4.94 50.9
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 122.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 10,575 0 - 573 3,400 84.90 0.00 105.98 384.30 1,406.50 0.00 1,983.80 362.65 5.64 - 1.08 0.18 4.94 50.9
New 20,596 4,486 20,038 17,017 11.16 0.40 6.02 15.23 1.00 0.00 0.00 13.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
05050001 Total 20,596 4,486 20,038 17,017 11.16 0.40 6.02 15.23 1.00 0.00 0.00 13.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 3,230 1,692 20,038 16,204 2.36 0.00 4.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 17,366 2,794 0 813 8.80 0.40 1.50 15.23 1.00 0.00 0.00 13.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
Pasquotank 15,400 2,500 0 0 396.80 0.00 21.40 68.65 1,149.13 0.00 6.00 139.32 0.00 25.35 0.00 180.94 0.0
03010205 Total 15,400 2,500 0 0 396.80 0.00 21.40 68.65 1,149.13 0.00 6.00 139.32 0.00 25.35 0.00 180.94 0.0
MOU 1,000 0 0 0 5.66 0.00 0.60 19.00 41.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 14,400 2,500 0 0 391.14 0.00 20.80 49.65 1,107.63 0.00 6.00 139.32 0.00 25.35 0.00 180.94 0.0
Roanoke 46,821 2,087 8,499 13,263 154.00 0.00 0.00 576.43 239.00 0.00 8.00 3,457.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03010102 Total 0 0 5,000 12,300 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 0 0 5,000 12,300 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03010103 Total 13,850 855 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 3,850 855 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 10,000 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03010104 Total 12,720 1,232 3,499 463 89.00 0.00 0.00 19.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 12,720 1,232 3,499 463 89.00 0.00 0.00 19.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03010106 Total 5,000 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 5,000 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03010107 Total 15,251 0 0 500 65.00 0.00 0.00 557.43 239.00 0.00 8.00 3,457.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 15,251 0 0 500 65.00 0.00 0.00 557.43 239.00 0.00 8.00 3,457.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
Savannah 3,310 1,600 0 3,115 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03060101 Total 3,310 1,600 0 3,115 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 3,310 1,600 0 3,115 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03060102 Total 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
Tar- Pamlico 35,718 9,292 2,585 0 170.64 59.40 35.10 419.90 441.03 9.24 2.95 557.79 3.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 105.7
03020101 Total 12,615 2,137 210 0 13.70 2.80 4.50 10.30 47.40 0.00 0.70 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 37.7
MOU 3,361 2,137 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 31.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.0
MOA 9,254 0 210 0 13.70 2.80 4.50 10.30 15.70 0.00 0.70 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 29.7
03020102 Total 6,500 0 0 0 87.00 0.00 7.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 6,500 0 0 0 87.00 0.00 7.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03020103 Total 7,603 7,155 0 0 2.94 56.60 23.60 348.00 129.40 0.00 2.25 9.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 36.5
MOU 0 1,300 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.0
MOA 7,603 5,855 0 0 2.94 56.60 23.60 348.00 129.40 0.00 2.25 9.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.5
03020104 Total 9,000 0 2,375 0 51.00 0.00 0.00 61.60 244.23 9.24 0.00 548.57 3.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 31.5
MOU 9,000 0 0 0 20.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.6
MOA 0 0 2,375 0 31.00 0.00 0.00 61.60 244.23 9.24 0.00 548.57 3.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.9
3 of 4 Updated 9/ 30/ 07
Appendix B: Summary of EEP Gross Assets ( High Quality Preservation SItes are not listed in table below)
Gross Assets
Stream
Restoration
Stream
Enhancment I
Stream
Enhancement II
Stream
Preservation
Riparian
Restoration
Riparian Creation
Riparian
Enhancement
Riparian
Preservation
Nonriparian
Restoration
Nonriparian
Creation
Nonriparian
Enhancement
Nonriparian
Preservation
Coastal Marsh
Restoration
Coastal Marsh
Creation
Coastal Marsh
Enhancement
Coastal Marsh
Preservation
Stream Buffer
River Basin
Cataloging
Unit
03020105 Total 0 0 0 0 16.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 0 0 0 0 16.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
Watauga 5,117 279 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
06010103 Total 5,117 279 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 5,117 279 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
White Oak 27,839 0 931 2,010 39.25 0.00 3.80 3.90 383.00 0.00 52.00 110.50 5.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03030001 Total 18,240 0 931 0 14.65 0.00 2.00 0.00 53.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 8,022 0 376 0 3.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 10,218 0 555 0 11.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 38.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03020106 Total 9,599 0 0 2,010 24.60 0.00 1.80 3.90 329.90 0.00 52.00 110.50 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 250.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 9,599 0 0 2,010 21.60 0.00 1.80 3.90 79.90 0.00 52.00 110.50 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
Yadkin 198,564 22,932 27,850 51,221 201.59 154.12 47.07 79.30 18.87 0.00 21.09 8.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03040101 Total 59,378 8,612 3,576 2,376 58.95 21.82 2.91 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 48,428 7,112 2,576 0 3.05 1.62 2.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 10,950 1,500 1,000 2,376 55.90 20.20 0.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03040102 Total 29,661 0 0 0 31.24 130.30 14.80 5.50 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 29,661 0 0 0 31.24 130.30 14.80 5.50 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03040103 Total 35,164 7,700 3,094 24,105 26.00 2.00 11.12 2.00 4.00 0.00 7.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 35,164 7,700 3,094 24,105 26.00 2.00 11.12 2.00 4.00 0.00 7.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03040104 Total 6,618 0 2,900 3,200 42.40 0.00 0.94 6.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 6,618 0 2,900 3,200 42.40 0.00 0.94 6.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03040105 Total 51,039 5,850 16,280 11,980 0.30 0.00 7.90 9.00 14.87 0.00 10.09 8.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 7,135 3,180 1,190 0 0.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 43,904 2,670 15,090 11,980 0.30 0.00 5.90 7.00 14.87 0.00 10.09 8.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03040201 Total 16,704 770 2,000 9,560 42.70 0.00 9.40 55.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 2,000 0 0.00 0.00 2.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 16,704 770 0 9,560 42.70 0.00 6.90 55.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03040202 Total 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
Grand Total 1,082,844 138,731 130,196 185,559 2,452.76 273.03 599.36 3,975.28 5,385.04 15.04 2,301.38 5,873.61 23.63 24.27 85.94 185.88 551.3
Grand Total MOU 330,884 57,980 68,554 49,411 264.93 8.62 157.99 383.68 347.73 0.00 96.46 209.76 5.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 268.7
Grand Total MOA 751,961 80,751 61,643 136,148 2,187.83 264.41 441.37 3,591.60 5,037.31 15.04 2,204.92 5,663.85 18.14 24.27 85.94 185.88 282.7
4 of 4 Updated 9/ 30/ 07
Appendix C: Net Remaining Asset Credits
Stream
Restoration
Stream
Restoration
Equivalent
Riparian
Restoration
Riparian
Restoration
Equivalent
Nonriparian
Restoration
Nonriparian
Restoration
Equivalent
Coastal Marsh
Restoration
Coastal Marsh
Restoration
Equivalent
Broad 60,490 1,712.80 11.40 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
03050105 Total 60,490 1,713 11.40 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 658 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 59,832 1,713 11.40 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Cape Fear 151,854 3,642 591.92 221.64 880.44 194.16 8.99 42.88
03030001
03030002 Total 22,708 1,352 50.59 8.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.45 4.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 22,707 1,352 50.14 4.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
03030003 Total 78,496 0 3.31 0.90 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00
MOU 15,809 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 62,687 0 3.31 0.90 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00
03030004 Total 36,642 2,170 129.76 68.15 10.12 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 3,797 0 43.68 1.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 32,845 2,170 86.08 66.43 10.12 0.00 0.00 0.00
03030005 Total 10,890 0 373.60 13.66 660.67 59.50 8.99 42.88
MOU 2,824 0 0.54 1.21 0.21 50.55 0.00 0.00
MOA 8,066 0 373.06 12.46 660.46 8.95 8.99 42.88
03030006 Total 1,673 120 8.93 13.40 160.02 1.09 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 1,673 120 8.93 13.40 160.02 1.09 0.00 0.00
03030007 Total 1,446 0 25.72 116.76 49.63 133.51 0.00 0.00
MOU 326 0 10.07 0.00 3.88 1.87 0.00 0.00
MOA 1,120 0 15.65 116.76 45.75 131.64 0.00 0.00
Catawba 37,448 39 13.50 1.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
03050101 Total 13,445 39 6.61 1.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 737 0 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 12,708 39 6.24 1.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
03050102 Total 23,803 0 6.89 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 23,803 0 6.89 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
03050103 Total 200 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 200 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Chowan 12,249 1,217 96.76 3.00 4.99 2.00 0.00 0.00
03010203 Total 9,443 660 84.46 3.00 4.99 2.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 9,443 660 84.46 3.00 4.99 2.00 0.00 0.00
03010201 Total 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
03010202 Total 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
03010204 Total 2,806 557 12.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 2,806 557 12.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
French Broad 76,632 2,048 10.75 8.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
06010105 Total 43,393 0 4.45 7.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 2.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 43,393 0 2.39 7.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
06010106 Total 4,491 123 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 4,491 123 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
06010108 Total 28,748 1,925 1.30 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 28,748 1,925 1.30 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hiwassee 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
06020002 Total 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
06020003 Total 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
River Basin
Cataloging Unit
Net Debited Asset Credits ( does not include outstanding permit requirements that have not yet been debited)
1 of 3 Updated 9/ 30/ 07
Appendix C: Net Remaining Asset Credits
Stream
Restoration
Stream
Restoration
Equivalent
Riparian
Restoration
Riparian
Restoration
Equivalent
Nonriparian
Restoration
Nonriparian
Restoration
Equivalent
Coastal Marsh
Restoration
Coastal Marsh
Restoration
Equivalent
River Basin
Cataloging Unit
Net Debited Asset Credits ( does not include outstanding permit requirements that have not yet been debited)
Little Tennessee 7,677 220 57.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
06010202 Total 5,407 0 5.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 5,407 0 5.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
06010203 Total 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
06010204 Total 2,269 220 52.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 2,269 220 52.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Lumber 8,228 350 19.98 18.19 581.55 60.28 0.00 0.00
03040203 Total 0 0 15.06 11.50 524.32 60.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 0 0 15.06 11.50 524.32 60.00 0.00 0.00
03040204 Total 4,946 0 4.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 4,946 0 4.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
03040206 Total 3,282 350 0.06 6.69 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 3,282 350 0.06 6.69 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00
03040207 Total 0 0 0.00 0.00 57.23 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 6.30 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 0 0 0.00 0.00 50.93 0.00 0.00 0.00
Neuse 34,709 680 409.86 446.65 1,491.55 1,118.52 5.28 1.08
03020201 Total 2,166 0 42.50 55.26 36.27 3.77 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 18.79 33.21 5.81 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 2,166 0 23.71 22.05 30.46 3.77 0.00 0.00
03020202 Total 8,464 0 178.55 171.71 24.62 25.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 8,464 0 178.55 171.71 24.62 25.00 0.00 0.00
03020203 Total 14,107 0 108.85 89.83 29.74 29.70 0.00 0.00
MOU 190 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 13,917 0 108.85 89.83 29.74 29.70 0.00 0.00
03020204 Total 9,972 680 79.96 129.85 1,400.92 1,060.05 5.28 1.08
MOU 0 0 0.09 0.00 2.66 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 9,972 680 79.87 129.85 1,398.26 1,060.05 5.28 1.08
New 24,053 3,198 9.41 6.06 1.00 2.68 0.00 0.00
05050001 Total 24,053 3,198 9.41 6.06 1.00 2.68 0.00 0.00
MOU 2,185 1,024 0.27 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 21,868 2,175 9.14 5.43 1.00 2.68 0.00 0.00
Pasquotank 15,578 0 394.18 21.72 1,133.86 30.76 3.13 35.67
03010205 Total 15,578 0 394.18 21.72 1,133.86 30.76 3.13 35.67
MOU 0 0 4.05 2.37 26.36 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 15,578 0 390.13 19.35 1,107.50 30.76 3.13 35.67
Roanoke 44,319 2,514 144.04 106.09 115.46 685.00 0.00 0.00
03010102 Total 1,961 2,421 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 1,961 2,421 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
03010103 Total 10,584 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 1,420 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 9,164 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
03010104 Total 14,941 93 88.08 3.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 14,941 93 88.08 3.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
03010106 Total 4,960 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 4,960 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
03010107 Total 11,873 0 55.96 102.54 115.46 685.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 11,873 0 55.96 102.54 115.46 685.00 0.00 0.00
Savannah 4,377 623 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.00
03060101 Total 4,377 623 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 4,377 623 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.00
2 of 3 Updated 9/ 30/ 07
Appendix C: Net Remaining Asset Credits
Stream
Restoration
Stream
Restoration
Equivalent
Riparian
Restoration
Riparian
Restoration
Equivalent
Nonriparian
Restoration
Nonriparian
Restoration
Equivalent
Coastal Marsh
Restoration
Coastal Marsh
Restoration
Equivalent
River Basin
Cataloging Unit
Net Debited Asset Credits ( does not include outstanding permit requirements that have not yet been debited)
03060102 Total 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Tar- Pamlico 30,954 0 159.05 100.81 389.32 110.46 3.24 0.00
03020101 Total 12,836 0 7.09 3.63 16.80 0.37 0.00 0.00
MOU 3,199 0 0.00 0.00 1.36 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 9,637 0 7.09 3.63 15.44 0.37 0.00 0.00
03020102 Total 6,454 0 80.91 3.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 6,454 0 80.91 3.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
03020103 Total 10,214 0 21.43 81.36 119.33 2.73 0.00 0.00
MOU 1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 10,213 0 21.43 81.36 119.33 2.73 0.00 0.00
03020104 Total 1,450 0 33.90 12.32 237.20 107.36 3.24 0.00
MOU 512 0 2.94 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 938 0 30.96 12.32 236.88 107.36 3.24 0.00
03020105 Total 0 0 15.72 0.00 15.98 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 0 0 15.72 0.00 15.98 0.00 0.00 0.00
Watauga 2,722 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
06010103 Total 2,722 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 2,722 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
White Oak 21,001 401.98 22.72 2.68 86.90 48.10 3.21 0.00
03030001 Total 11,926 0 2.36 1.00 26.03 0.00 2.73 0.00
MOU 3,009 0 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.73 0.00
MOA 8,917 0 2.01 1.00 26.03 0.00 0.00 0.00
03020106 Total 9,074 402 20.36 1.68 60.87 48.10 0.48 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.00
MOA 9,074 402 19.70 1.68 60.87 48.10 0.18 0.00
Yadkin 137,120 7,892.20 224.87 31.22 14.51 10.73 0.00 0.00
03040101 Total 21,601 475 60.40 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU