Ecosystem Enhancement Program quarterly report. |
Previous | 12 of 27 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
|
This page
All
|
February 11, 2008 Col. John E. Pulliam, Jr., Commander U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District Post Office Box 1890 Wilmington, NC 29402- 1890 Attn: Scott C. McLendon Re: Memorandum of Agreement ( MOA) Quarterly Report Dear Col. Pulliam: The Ecosystem Enhancement Program ( EEP) is pleased to submit the First Quarterly Report of State Fiscal Year 2007- 2008 to the United States Army Corps of Engineers ( USACE), Wilmington District. This Quarterly Report addresses the period beginning July 1 and ending September 30, 2007. The materials presented within provide information as required under Section VII, Part B of the Memorandum of Agreement among the USACE, the N. C. Department of Transportation ( NCDOT) and the N. C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources ( NCDENR), signed into effect on July 22, 2003. The following actions occurred this quarter: • NCDENR Assistant Secretary for Natural Resources Richard Rogers accepted a position as executive director of the Clean Water Management Trust Fund. Since that time, Mr. Manly Wilder has been appointed to assume this position. Mr. Wilder retired from the Natural Resources Conservation Service with 35 years of service and joined NCDENR in 2005 as director of the Division of Soil and Water Conservation before assuming his new duties in the Secretary’s office. • In August 2007, in partnership with USACE and the NCDOT, a workshop was held to address surplus assets and develop means to best utilize those resources. Under the leadership of the Tri- party executives, EEP and NCDOT are coordinating the action plans according to the recommendations and approvals of the task force. EEP has temporarily suspended some mitigation project pursuits as we continue to receive case- by- case mitigation alternatives under a proposal by NCDOT, and review by USACE. Col. John E. Pulliam, Jr., Commander February 11, 2008 Page two • Overall conformance remains in good standing. Details are provided in this quarterly report. EEP remains committed to the success of this innovative partnership. We appreciate the continued leadership provided by your office. Please contact me should you have any questions regarding this report. Respectfully, William D. Gilmore, PE Director, Ecosystem Enhancement Program cc: Manly Wilder, Assistant Secretary for Natural Resources, NCDENR Bill Rosser, Highway Administrator, NCDOT North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM QUARTERLY REPORT July 1 through September 30, 2007 U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District This quarterly report is intended to satisfy reporting requirements of the Memorandum of Agreement as amended and entered into by the N. C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources ( NCDENR), the N. C. Department of Transportation ( NCDOT), and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers ( USACE), Wilmington District, on July 22, 2003, for providing compensatory mitigation through the NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program to offset impacts to waters and wetlands due to activities authorized by Clean Water Act permits. Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1 through September 30, 2007 Table of Contents Page i. Introduction 3 ii. Report Structure 3 Section I. EEP Restoration, Enhancement, Creation, and Preservation Projects 4 EEP Gross Assets 4 EEP Gross Asset Summary 5 EEP Net Remaining Assets 5 EEP Gross High Quality Preservation Assets 5 High Quality Preservation Sites Acquired This Quarter 6 EEP Net High Quality Preservation Assets 7 Section II. Tri- Party Memorandum of Agreement 7 EEP MOA Gross and Net Assets 7 MOA Current Mitigation Requirements, Debits, and Commitments 7 MOA Future Requirements 9 MOA Future Expectations 10 MOA Conformance 10 Section III. In- Lieu Fee ( ILF) Memorandum of Understanding ( MOU) 11 EEP ILF MOU Assets – Gross and Net Assets 11 ILF MOU Present and Future Quarter Mitigation Requirements 11 MOU Net Asset Balances 11 MOU Conformance 12 MOU Future Expectations 13 Section IV. Planning 13 Local Watershed Planning for Projected Impacts 13 Section V. Monitoring 14 USGS Eight- Digit Cataloging Units Map 16 Section VI. EEP Conformance Action Strategies by Cataloging Unit 17 Section VII. Future Conformance 29 Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 1 Appendix Listing Appendix A EEP Gross Asset List of Tier 1 Restoration, Enhancement, Creation, and Preservation Sites Appendix B Summary of EEP Gross Assets Appendix C Net Remaining Asset Credits Appendix D EEP Gross High Quality Preservation Project List and Summary D1 – EEP Gross High Quality Preservation Project List D2 – EEP Gross High Quality Preservation Summary Appendix E Summaries of EEP High Quality Preservation Assets Utilized and Remaining E1 - Net Remaining HQP Assets Summary E2 – Summary of EEP High Quality Preservation Assets Utilized Appendix F MOA Mitigation Requirements, Debits, and Commitments F1- MOA Permit Requirements and Debits F2- List of EEP MOA Year 4 Mitigation Requirements F3- Summary of EEP MOA Year 4 Mitigation Requirements F4- List of EEP MOA Mitigation Commitments F5- Summary of Outstanding EEP MOA Mitigation Commitments ( Potential Future Requirements Not Yet Permitted) Appendix G MOA Future Requirements - Remaining NCDOT Projected Impacts Appendix H MOA Net Asset Balances ( Surplus and Deficits) Appendix I MOA Outstanding Permit Requirements Appendix J MOU ILF Present and Future Quarter Mitigation Requirements Appendix K MOU Net Asset Balances ( Surplus and Deficits) Appendix L MOU Outstanding Permit Requirements Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 2 i. Introduction This report covers the period beginning July 1, 2007, through September 30, 2007. This report documents the quarterly status of both the Memorandum of Understanding ( MOU) between NCDENR and USACE established in 1998 and Memorandum of Agreement ( MOA) among NCDENR, USACE and NCDOT, signed July 22, 2003, and combines reporting into a single document. It is expected that the format of this report will evolve as improvements and adjustments are suggested and made by USACE and other interested parties. For more information about the agreements, visit our Web site at www. nceep. net. ii. Report Structure This report is broken into seven main sections: SECTION I. EEP Restoration, Enhancement, Creation and Preservation Projects- This section reports the EEP stream and wetland restoration, enhancement, creation, and preservation projects that have been developed under the MOA and MOU programs. This section lists EEP projects, provides a summary of Gross Assets, and a summary of Net Assets. SECTION II. MOA– This section details specifics regarding the MOA program. SECTION III. MOU– This section details specifics regarding the MOU program. SECTION IV. Planning– This section summarizes watershed- planning efforts during the quarter. SECTION V. Monitoring– This section summarizes project- monitoring efforts during the quarter. SECTION VI. Conformance Action Strategies by Cataloging Unit– This section discusses the specific action strategies EEP has in place to address any outstanding mitigation needs in the various river basins and cataloging units in North Carolina. SECTION VII. Future Conformance – This section explains how delays in permitting could temporarily impact conformance in several CUs. Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 3 SECTION I: EEP RESTORATION, ENHANCEMENT, CREATION AND PRESERVATION PROJECTS Section I is a report on the status of the restoration, enhancement, creation and preservation projects developed by the Ecosystem Enhancement Program. High Quality Preservation ( HQP) projects are also summarized independently of EEP’s other restoration, enhancement and preservation projects. EEP GROSS ASSETS Currently, EEP has assets exceeding 1,537,330 linear feet of stream and 21,747 acres of wetlands. In addition to these, EEP has instituted HQP assets exceeding 1,242,0256 linear feet ( over 235 miles) of streams and 8,549 acres of wetlands. EEP projects originate from three main areas: 1. Projects that were initiated by NCDOT; 2. Projects that were initiated by the NCDENR Wetlands Restoration Program; and 3. Projects that have been initiated by EEP. Appendix A: EEP Gross Asset List of Tier 1 Restoration, Enhancement, Creation and Preservation Sites contains a complete listing of the current EEP individual stream and wetland restoration, enhancement, creation and preservation projects as of Sept. 30, 2007, by river basin and eight- digit Cataloging Unit ( CU). ( HQP sites are not listed in this table.) During July 2007, a number of older projects experienced asset quantity adjustments; these adjustments are reflected in this quarterly report. Additionally, a few projects were dropped by EEP during this quarter due to technical considerations. These projects are discussed in more detail in Section VI. All of the projects listed in Appendix A have had their mitigation credits transferred to or originated from EEP. For former NCDOT projects that had completed construction prior to the formation of EEP, only the undebited remaining restoration, enhancement or preservation feet/ acres were transferred. Thus Appendix A only shows the transferred restoration, enhancement or preservation remaining for these projects ( i. e., the assets that had not been utilized by NCDOT). In some cases, former NCDOT projects had no remaining credits associated with a specific project. These projects are listed as having no gross assets in Appendix A. All of the other types of projects show the gross amount of restoration, enhancement or preservation associated with these projects. These numbers are subject to change as design or monitoring results are received. Projects initiated ( but not completed/ not debited) by NCDOT’s Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch prior to the inception of the EEP are in various stages of implementation. EEP staff is currently managing these projects. EEP will use these mitigation credits according to the guidelines Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 4 of the Tri- Party MOA. The projects that were initiated by NCDOT as full-delivery projects are currently under contract with NCDOT but are available for debiting for the purposes of EEP, as determined by credit release schedules. Projects that were initiated and developed by the staff of the NCDENR Wetlands Restoration Program have been acquired as defined by the 1998 MOU between USACE and NCDENR, or the 2003 EEP Tri- Party MOA. EEP GROSS ASSET SUMMARY Appendix B: Summary of EEP Gross Assets is a summary of the gross assets by river basin, CU and program ( MOA or MOU). Appendix B also provides grand totals for the entire state. These numbers are subject to change as design and/ or monitoring results are received or as new projects are added into the program. Also, as stated above, former NCDOT sites that were completed and partially debited prior to the formation of EEP contain only the remaining credits from each site. This means that only the remaining credits ( as determined by NCDOT and USACE) were summarized in this table for NCDOT transferred projects. EEP NET REMAINING ASSETS Appendix C: Net Remaining Asset Credits is a summary of the remaining assets associated with restoration, enhancement, creation and preservation projects that EEP currently has available to meet compensatory mitigation requirements. The remaining assets are summarized for the MOA and MOU programs, respectively. Note that the assets have been converted into restoration and restoration- equivalent credits in this table. The amounts of mitigation provided in the table are the total remaining amount of mitigation available to a particular project over time. Where credit- release schedules have been established, EEP will debit from these projects accordingly. Also note that amounts of mitigation for any project may change from the current snapshot as additional design and monitoring information becomes available, or as mitigation units are refined as per the goals set forth in the EEP Tri- Party 2007 MOA. EEP GROSS HIGH QUALITY PRESERVATION ASSETS All of the High Quality Preservation sites have been acquired by the State except for one State Parks parcel. That acquisition is expected to be completed during the next quarter. Appendix D1: EEP Gross High Quality Preservation Project ( HQP) List displays all HQP that EEP has acquired since July 2003 by ecoregion. All HQP quality preservation assets are MOA assets. Gross stream and wetland feet or acreages are subject to change as additional survey work is completed on these sites. EEP has protected over 235 miles of stream, along with 7,040 acres of Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 5 riparian wetland and 1,508 acres of non- riparian wetland through High Quality Preservation. These gross assets are lower than those reported in the final quarterly report for 2006- 2007, and lower than those reported in the 2006- 2007 Annual Report. Unfortunately, twelve HQP sites that were listed in quarter 4 of 2006- 2007 as tier 1 sites had to be dropped in Quarter 1 of 2007- 2008. These sites are listed in Table 1. None of these tier 1 sites had any compensatory mitigation debits charged to them. EEP stopped acquisition of these projects after NCDOT reduced their mitigation order. Applications are being made to the State Trust Funds and other funding sources to complete the acquisition of these sites. They have been deleted from the EEP mitigation ledger. Because these sites were dropped, the gross assets attributed to HQP sites are lower than those shown in the last annual report and quarterly reports. Table 1. High Quality Preservation Acquisitions Dropped Due to Reduced Mitigation Order Beginning Balances Site Name County Eco-region River Basin CU TOTAL Stream TOTAL Riverine TOTAL Non- Riverine Fishing Creek ( Gold Mine) Franklin CP Tar- Pamlico 03020102 6,707 20.20 0.00 Fishing Creek ( Maple Branch) Warren CP Tar- Pamlico 03020102 8,218 20.00 0.00 IP Upper Fishing Creek 2 Warren CP Tar- Pamlico 03020102 5,403 0.00 0.00 IP Upper Reedy Creek Warren CP Tar- Pamlico 03020102 5,301 0.00 0.00 Shocco Creek ( IP # 1) Warren CP Tar- Pamlico 03020102 4,355 10.00 0.00 Shocco Creek ( IP # 2) Warren CP Tar- Pamlico 03020102 4,583 10.00 0.00 IP Lower Fishing Creek 2 Edgecombe NICP Tar- Pamlico 03020102 4,419 0.00 0.00 Upper Roanoke ( Civil War) Northampton NICP Roanoke 03010107 1,720 0.00 0.00 Upper Roanoke ( Cypress Cr) Northampton NICP Roanoke 03010107 11,839 0.00 0.00 Upper Roanoke ( Odum/ Cal) Northampton NICP Roanoke 03010107 2,930 0.00 0.00 Juniper Creek IP Columbus SICP Lumber 03040206 22,510 0.0 0.00 Juniper Creek IP Brunswick SOCP Lumber 03040206 431 21.00 0.00 All sites were part of the International Paper transaction. The properties had already been purchased by The Nature Conservancy on behalf of the State. No new HQP closings were completed during the quarter. Appendix D2, EEP Gross HQP Summary lists balances by ecoregion. Total beginning balances for stream feet is 1,242,025.5, riparian wetland acres is 7,040.47 and non- riparian acres is 1,508.34. Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 6 EEP NET HIGH QUALITY PRESERVATION ASSETS Appendix E, EEP Net High Quality Preservation ( HQP) Assets lists the net remaining HQP assets available for future debits by ecoregion. Currently, all HQP assets are located in the MOA Program. Gross stream and wetland feet or acreages are subject to change as additional survey work is completed on sites. More than $ 74 million has been spent to date to protect these conservation lands. Projections indicate based on NCDOT current mitigation order, that the majority of these HQP mitigation units will be fully utilized within the current NCDOT Transportation Improvement Plan ( TIP) Across the state, EEP has net HQP assets of 797,774 feet ( 151 miles) of stream, 6,482 acres of riverine wetlands and 1,233 acres of non- riverine wetland. These assets include properties secured with recorded option agreements, permanent conservation easements, and fee simple purchases. To further the goal of no net loss of aquatic resources, utilization of these preservation sites will be accomplished by restoration- type mitigation projects within the same watershed where impacts occur. SECTION II: TRI- PARTY MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT ( MOA) This section of the report provides specifics with regard to the EEP Tri- Party MOA. Specifically, this section describes the current EEP mitigation acceptances under the MOA, the debits that have been made thus far, the schedule for future debits, and the remaining projected impacts that NCDOT has supplied that may indicate when future requirements may occur. EEP MOA GROSS AND NET ASSETS Both gross and net assets are listed in appendices B and C as described in Section I. MOA CURRENT MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS, DEBITS, AND COMMITMENTS This section describes EEP’s current regulatory requirements, debits and commitments for the MOA program. The structure of this section has been modified from previous quarterly reports in an attempt to provide additional clarity. EEP, regulatory agencies and NCDOT follow rigorous procedures in order for EEP to assume mitigation responsibility for NCDOT- permitted impacts. In accordance with the Tri- Party MOA, NCDOT forecasts impacts associated with each of its transportation projects. EEP uses this projected impact Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 7 information to develop restoration, enhancement, creation and preservation projects sufficient to meet mitigation needs and timelines. Approximately six- to-nine months in advance of an individual NCDOT transportation- project letting, NCDOT formally submits a request to EEP to provide the mitigation. EEP reviews each request and submits acceptance letters to NCDOT and the regulatory agencies for each project where EEP assumes mitigation responsibility. These acceptance letters are used during NCDOT’s permitting process. Typically, there is a three- to- six month time period between EEP’s acceptance letters and the permit issuance. The permit specifies the responsible party ( EEP for off- site mitigation), location, amount and type of the mitigation. Prior to permit issuances, all EEP- issued acceptance letters are considered “ commitments.” After permit issuances, EEP’s commitments are transformed into mitigation “ requirements.” The permit issuance date determines the timeframes when EEP must provide the mitigation ( this time frame is often called the debit- due date). On March 8, 2007, Section X of the Tri- Party MOA was amended which changed the future mitigation debit- due dates and mitigation milestones. For MOA permits issued in MOA Year 5 ( July 1, 2007 through June 30, 2008), the debit-due date is June 30, 2008. ( For MOU permits issued in MOA Year 5, the debit due date is June 30, 2009.) Appendix F is a series of five tables listing data for MOA Mitigation Requirements, Debits, and Commitments. F1- MOA Permit Requirements and Debits lists all mitigation requirements that were due as of September 30, 2007, and lists mitigation debits that have been made to offset those requirements. F2- List of EEP MOA Year 5 Mitigation Requirements lists projects for which permits have been accepted, issued and received by EEP in MOA Year 5. Mitigation for these projects will be due on June 30, 2008. F3- Summary of EEP MOA Year 5 Mitigation Requirements summarizes mitigation requirements for projects listed in Appendix F2. F4- List of EEP MOA Mitigation Commitments lists projects in which EEP has issued mitigation acceptance letters, but permits have not yet been issued/ received. The mitigation due date is determined by permit issuance date and Section X of the 2007 TriParty MOA. Since these projects have not yet been permitted, mitigation has not yet been required. However, EEP has applied some credits in advance. The table lists the HQP sites that have been debited and applied in advance of the official mitigation due date. ( Note: Impacts and mitigation requirements listed in table F4 are projections only. The actual finalized impacts and mitigation requirements will not be known until permits are issued. However, the table does list the amount of mitigation Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 8 that EEP has thus far committed to provide for these projects as detailed in EEP’s mitigation- acceptance letters.) F5- Summary of Outstanding EEP MOA Mitigation Commitments summarizes the list of commitments detailed in Appendix F4. MOA FUTURE REQUIREMENTS Appendix G: MOA Future Requirements - Remaining NCDOT Projected Impacts is a summary of the NCDOT mitigation order shown as impacts associated with NCDOT’s seven- year Transportation Improvement Plan ( TIP). Appendix G is summarized by MOA impact year, river basin and CU. The data in Appendix G originates from the original seven- year impact forecast submitted by NCDOT to EEP in February 2007. Some of the individual project impact projections have been updated by more recently collected field data. These revised impacts were submitted by NCDOT on a project- by- project basis over the last quarter. Appendix G has also been updated to show only the remaining forecasted impacts covering the seven- year projection time period. In other words, since February 2007 some of the original forecasted impacts are no longer forecasts, as NCDOT has formally requested that EEP accept mitigation responsibility for specific impacts associated with the transportation projects. Appendix G shows only those projects where NCDOT has yet to request mitigation or where EEP has not yet formally accepted mitigation responsibility. NCDOT divisions were unable to provide impacts by individual MOA Year and developed a lump- sum estimate for seven years. This lump- sum amount was spread evenly through each of the seven TIP years. All projects that were projected to occur in MOA Years 1, 2, or 3 and that were not accepted or permitted during these periods are now considered as MOA Year 5 impact projections. The TIP list is a dynamic list where individual project let dates frequently move in time. Major accelerations or volatility of project lettings or impact projections could result in major changes to EEP’s potential mitigation requirements and EEP’s procurement strategies. MOA FUTURE EXPECTATIONS During Year 4, the issue of surplus assets became significant among the Tri- Party agencies. At the time of this report, “ surplus assets” were defined as “ unused” credits that are projected to be remaining after accounting for the number of credits that will be used to meet the current TIP ( 5 to 6 years of TIP projects) and one year of ILF requirements. Surplus assets currently exist in a number of CUs. Surplus assets were mostly developed during the pre- EEP era when NCDOT initiated its first attempt at developing advanced mitigation. Unfortunately, these advances were often made without the benefit of precise forecasts of mitigation Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 9 need. These sites were originally developed with the intent to negotiate usage on a case- by- case basis. Today, many of these sites contain credits that exceed the forecasted need of the current TIP. Surplus mitigation has also been created when mitigation orders based on forecasted mitigation needs have exceeded actual permitted mitigation requirements. Incidental procurement ( when wetlands and stream credits exist on the same project, though only one type may be needed) and asset- yield variation on existing projects may also lead to small amounts of forecasted surplus. NCDOT also has been experiencing financial strain and has expressed an interest in utilizing these advanced mitigation credits to offset current and future mitigation need. To address these issues, NCDOT, USACE and DENR met in July 2007 to develop a plan to: 1. Create a strategy for reducing existing surplus assets used for offsetting NCDOT project impacts. This became the top priority for the August surplus-assets workshop. 2. Prevent the creation of new surplus assets that are intended to offset NCDOT project impacts. During this surplus- strategy development period and after discussions with USACE, DENR, and NCDOT, EEP has ceased procurement of new mitigation sites in CUs in river basins that contain surplus credits. Consequently, MOA conformance in these river basins may decline through the next MOA year due to the requested hold on procuring new mitigation sites in these areas. This decrease in conformance will be moderated due to the substantial advanced mitigation that has already been achieved for MOA Year 5. During this quarter, only stream conformance due to two projects being dropped for technical reasons. These projects are discussed in detail in Section VI. Appendix H: MOA Net Asset Balances ( Surplus and Deficits) demonstrates the current health of the program by showing the current net surpluses and deficits associated with the MOA program as of Sept. 30, 2007. As shown in Appendix C, EEP has obtained a program- wide 693,947 advanced stream credits, 3,134.92 advanced riparian- wetland credits, 6,967.58 advanced nonriparian- wetland credits and 103.47 advanced coastal- marsh wetland credits. Of these amounts, the MOA program had advanced 655,057 stream credits, 3,005.01 riparian credits, 6,868.25 nonriparian credits, and 100.45 coastal marsh credits. These advanced summaries do not include the advanced and unused HQP assets which are shown in Appendix E1. These credits are advanced credits that will be applied to future permits as mitigation is needed. MOA CONFORMANCE During the first quarter, overall MOA conformance decreased slightly since the last quarter. While riparian, nonriparian, and coastal marsh conformance Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 10 remained unchanged at 98.14 percent, 100 percent, and 100 percent respectively, stream conformance lowered from 98.14 percent to 93.82 percent as 3 previously met requirements became partially non- conformant as a result of EEP dropping the Black Gum Creek Full Delivery project and the Middle Swamp Creek project due to technical concerns. The current outstanding stream, riparian wetland and nonriparian wetland mitigation for Quarter 3 is 13,850.6 stream credits, 2.394 riparian credits, and zero nonriparian credits and zero coastal- marsh credits, respectively. The number of permits needing additional mitigation increase seven to 10 permits. A complete listing of the MOA permit requirements not in full conformance is listed in Appendix I: MOA Outstanding Permit Requirements. All 10 permits needing additional mitigation have been partially fulfilled. EEP’s Conformance Action Strategies for outstanding mitigation requirements are detailed in Section VI. SECTION III: IN- LIEU FEE ( ILF) MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ( MOU) EEP ILF MOU ASSETS – GROSS AND NET ASSETS Both gross and net assets are listed in appendices B and C as described in Section I. ILF MOU PRESENT AND FUTURE QUARTER MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS The MOU program had 68 new requirements that became due this quarter ( up 23 since last quarter), representing 16,683 credits of stream, 26.49 credits of riparian wetland, 14.63 credits of nonriparian wetland and 0.16 credits of coastal- marsh requirements. A complete summary of the requirements that became due is listed in Appendix J: MOU ILF Present and Future Quarter Mitigation Requirements. Appendix J also lists requirements that will become due over the next quarter. The requirements associated with the MOU Program are generally lower than historical levels ( though the current quarter can be consider a large amount under the new scale). This decrease is a result of NCDOT departing the ILF MOU program. Almost all new NCDOT mitigation requirements are now being handled under the Tri- Party MOA. However, the number of non- NCDOT applicants and the amount of mitigation associated with these applicants is increasing each year. MOU NET ASSET BALANCES Unlike the Tri- Party MOA program, the goal of which is to develop assets up to seven years in advance of permitted impacts, the MOU program is designed to produce instituted mitigation assets one year from the permit year in which a permit is issued. Another major objective of the MOU program is to have an ILF project appropriate to pay the actual cost of restoration. Together, these two goals result Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 11 in a delicate balance of building assets in just the right sizes and just the right amounts in each of the CUs to offset permitted requirements, while maintaining sufficient funds to pay for the required mitigation projects. In order to capitalize on efficiencies of scale, restoration project sizes tend to be large. On the other hand, ILF mitigation requirements tend to be very small. Thus there is always the potential to create surplus assets in some CUs and deficits in other CUs. The MOU program is at optimal performance when there are zero surplus assets and zero requirement deficits, and zero remaining funds. The current net ILF program- asset balances ( surplus and deficits) are shown in Appendix K: MOU Net Asset Balances. The ILF program has produced a net statewide asset balance of 32,148 stream credits, 117.91 riparian- wetland credits, 95.64 nonriparian- wetland credits and 2.83 coastal- marsh wetland credits. These asset balances show a decrease from the previous quarter in net balances for stream credits, riparian wetlands, nonriparian wetlands and coastal marsh. During the last quarter, the net asset balance was 41,837 credits of stream, 143.58 credits of riparian wetlands, 99.89 nonriparian- wetland credits and 3.34 coastal-marsh wetland credits. ( Note: The total amounts of MOU available unused credits are shown in Appendix C. The available unused credits are larger because outstanding requirements ( deficits) are not considered in Appendix C.) MOU CONFORMANCE The amount of nonconformance ( as measured in number of permit requirements met) decreased slightly during the current quarter with the addition of 68 new requirements. During the last quarter, 97.61 percent of requirements were fully met. This quarter, 96.76percent of all requirements were fully met. As of Sept. 30, 2007, the MOU program had 803 total requirements. Of these, 777 are conformant, six are in partial conformance and 20 are in non-conformance. Therefore the EEP has 96.76 percent of all MOU requirements in full conformance, 0.7% in partial conformance and 2.5 percent in non-conformance. During the previous quarter, 18 requirements had not been fully met. Of the 26 non- conformant requirements, 20 were related to wetland requirements, and six were related to stream requirements. The magnitude of outstanding stream requirements decreased this quarter. At the end of the last quarter, EEP had not met 6,886 credits of stream mitigation. As of Sept. 30, 2007, the remaining outstanding stream mitigation needs were 6,742 stream credits. The magnitude of outstanding riparian increased from 9.3 credits to 12 credits. The magnitude of outstanding nonriparian increased from 1.11 to 3.70 nonriparian Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 12 wetland credits. The magnitude of outstanding coastal marsh credits decreased from 1.11 to 0.20 coastal- marsh wetland credits. A complete listing of the permit requirements not in full conformance is listed in Appendix L: MOU Outstanding Permit Requirements. A narrative addressing EEP action plans for non- conformant CUs is included in this report in Section VI. MOU FUTURE EXPECTATIONS The status of the MOU program is expected to be relatively steady over the course of the next fiscal year, though some decreases in conformance may be expected since all EEP projects in development were placed on hold between June and November 2007 while the surplus- asset issue previously described was being discussed among the Tri- Party agencies. Additional buying and selling of excess assets between the MOA and MOU programs is expected to continue. These transactions will result in improved conformance capabilities for both programs. SECTION IV: PLANNING In Quarter 2, EEP began the following watershed planning initiatives: • Collaboration with Wake County government agencies to develop a countywide watershed plan. The proposed strategy under development will combine the county’s desire to purchase easements and preserve green space with EEP’s mission to produce projects that improve watershed function. • Participation in the Chatham County Partnership to help promote implementation of the Rocky River Local Watershed Planning ( LWP) and identify wetland restoration opportunities. • Initiation of contracts to develop a new LWP in the Goose and Crooked Creek watersheds near Monroe in the Yadkin 05 CU. ( This project was placed on hold pending DOT budget approval.) • Scoped a contract to perform landowner outreach for priority restoration projects in the Muddy Creek watershed in McDowell County, in the Catawba 01 catalog unit. • Phase IV activities in the Peachtree- Martins Creek LWP area, focusing on landowner outreach for priority restoration opportunities. • Discussions with local resource professionals in Surry County in advance of a proposed new watershed planning initiative to support mitigation efforts in Yadkin 01. ( This project was placed on hold pending DOT budget approval.) EEP continued the following initiatives: • CU- screening activities in Little Tennessee 01, 02, and 03, Chowan 03 and 04, Yadkin 05 and 202; and Cape Fear 04, 05, 06 and 07, to develop River Basin Restoration Priorities. Activities included analyzing Watershed Attribute Matrices, conducting field site visits, meeting with local resource professionals and hosting workshops to solicit input on priority watersheds for restoration. • Phase IV activities in the Lower Creek LWP area ( Catawba 01), consisting of EEP planners participating on Lower Creek Advisory Team ( LCAT), meeting Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 13 with the Education subcommittee to assist local watershed education efforts, and working with Implementation staff to “ ground- truth” LWP- identified project sites. • Joint Phase IV plan development for the Little Lick Creek, Lick Creek, Ellerbe Creek, Swift Creek and Lake Rogers watersheds in the Upper Neuse. • Crisp Creek Drainage District Phase IV plan demonstration project in Tar- Pamlico 03. • Phase II Fishing Creek LWP, including a fifth stakeholder meeting in Oxford in October. • Phases I & II LWP in White Oak 01 and White Oak 06 CUs. • Phase II fieldwork for the Tickle, Travis, and Little Alamance Local Watershed Plan, including field assessment of streams, and continued work on water quality assessment. • Received second set of new data from the N. C. Center for Geographic Information and Analysis for CU screening. • Contributed to the N. C. Submerged Aquatic Vegetation( SAV) mapping initiative and began developing a white paper that discusses the potential for SAV restoration in the state. • Continued work with Tetra Tech in the Catawba 03 CU to assess and identify non- traditional mitigation opportunities to accommodate unmet wetland needs. • Continued collaborative work with the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service and other state and federal agencies on aquatic organism passage in the Little Tennessee River basin. EEP completed the following initiatives: • CU- screening activities in Catawba 01, 02, and 03 to develop River Basin Restoration Priorities. • Stoney Creek Local Watershed Plan Phase IV was presented to the Wayne County Board of Commissioners and to the Goldsboro City Council. • Phases I- III of the Peachtree- Martins Creek LWP effort were completed with the development of the Watershed Management Plan and presentation of the plan during a public meeting. SECTION V: MONITORING For the first quarter, monitoring staff were involved in maintenance site assessment, full- delivery site assessment, closeout of Wildlife Resources Commission( WRC) stream projects and asset verification. Monitoring staff participated in an assessment of specified maintenance projects. In addition to assessment, staff members utilized this time as a maintenance training opportunity internal to the Project Control and Research Group of EEP. Moreover, staff members also participated in an assessment of select full- delivery sites. Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 14 Throughout the quarter, staff members have participated in closeout activities related to EEP projects. Several WRC stream projects were proposed and visited during this period to verify the status and fitness for closeout for the PACG- TC. During this quarter every year henceforth, monitoring staff will conduct an asset verification on all projects in Year 3 of monitoring. The purpose of this effort is to provide a check of the assets for the Strategic Planning Section. Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 15 Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 16 SECTION VI: EEP COMPLIANCE ACTION STRATEGIES BY CATALOGING UNIT ACTION STRATEGIES FOR NON- COMPLIANT CUs CAPE FEAR 03030002 Outstanding Mitigation Required Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent Streams 0 0 Riparian 0 0 Non- Riparian 0.15 0.15 Coastal Marsh 0 0 Background: Cape Fear 03030002 is a high demand CU for stream- and- riparian mitigation needs. Nonriparian- mitigation impacts are inconsistent, most likely due to the relative scarcity of nonriparian wetlands in the watershed. CU Immediate Action Plan: The Watershed Planning and Program Implementation Group has been assigned responsibility for procuring 2.5 Restoration ( R) and 2.0 Restoration Equivalent ( RE) type nonriparian- mitigation credits before the end of Year 5. CU Long- Range Action Plan: EEP plans to issue Full Delivery Proposals for Nonriparian Wetland mitigation credits for the long term needs within the CU. The magnitude of the request will be based primarily on projected NCDOT long term nonriparian- wetland mitigation needs. CATAWBA 03050103 Outstanding Mitigation Required Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent Streams 0 0 Riparian 5.33 3.80 Non- Riparian 1.80 0 Coastal Marsh 0 0 Background: Catawba 03050103 has been identified as a critical CU watershed in the state by EEP, as it is a very difficult CU for producing compensatory mitigation for streams and wetlands. Catawba 03050103 is comprised mostly of the greater Charlotte metropolitan area. Most streams in Catawba 03050103 are degraded and have experienced the growing pains of urbanization and, more recently, suburban sprawl. Urbanization presents challenges in producing stream- Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 17 mitigation projects due to arduous constraints often in place along these streams. Typical constraints include sewer lines along and in the streams; residential, industrial and commercial development in the floodplain; FEMA- regulated streams; hazardous waste; stormwater outlets; unknown pipe outlets; local ordinances; leaking sewer lines; chemical spills; local landfills within the stream; the relative large size of streams per acre watershed; large numbers of landowners per potential project site; etc. Each of these constraints limits the type and size of the potential stream- restoration project, and also significantly increases the cost of these projects. Nevertheless, EEP has worked closely with Mecklenburg County, the City of Charlotte, and the regulatory agencies to produce adequate stream-mitigation projects to compensate for impacts. However, since impacts are continuing at a rapid rate, it is unlikely that EEP can continue to produce traditional stream- mitigation projects within the CU at the same rate that mitigation requirements are being produced. Wetlands restoration is extremely limited within this CU. Nearly all of remaining wetlands within the CU are located along large river floodplains, or are relatively small mafic- type depressional wetlands. These wetlands are continually being impacted, as development and urbanization is occurring at very high levels within this CU. Restoration opportunities for these types of wetlands do not exist in any significant quantity within this CU. Most of the historical wetlands loss is currently occupied either by development or located along riparian systems. Wetlands restoration along riparian systems is also typically not possible because the streams are regulated under stringent FEMA no- rise regulations. In order to perform most riparian- wetlands restoration, the stream level often needs to be elevated so that the stream can access its historic floodplain. FEMA and local regulations make this exceedingly difficult in most of this CU. Also, raising flood elevations is problematic because of the amount of floodplain development located in this CU. Finally, locating suitable wetlands- restoration opportunities has been made more difficult because of soil mapping in Mecklenburg County. The current Mecklenburg Division of Soil and Water soil map has not indicated any hydric A soils. While hydric A soils certainly exist in Mecklenburg, the maps do not detail their locations. Typically, floodplains are mapped as Monacan soils, which often have hydric inclusions. Another problem associated with wetlands restoration within this CU is the amount of time it will take for a specific wetlands- restoration project to be constructed. Due to FEMA and local regulations, most wetlands projects will need to undergo a long flood- level modeling and evaluation period. The result is one- to- three additional years to complete construction beyond projects that do not require this level of modeling. This historical presence of endangered mussel species also has made implementation of projects difficult in this watershed. EEP is having difficulty in getting permits to implement some projects in the watershed due to USFW agency concerns that the restoration of upstream tributaries will cause temporary Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 18 sedimentation during construction that could negatively affect downstream populations of endangered species. The USFWS supports riparian vegetation restoration only in these types of areas. Unfortunately, the in- stream conditions of many of these degraded streams are too unstable to allow for riparian vegetation only restoration to be successful. The overall degree of difficulty in identifying stream- and wetlands- restoration opportunities is reflected in the results of the last six RFPs issued by EEP and the Wetlands Restoration Program. After the first five RFP requests, EEP/ WRP had received zero wetland project submittals and only two small stream projects. The stream projects were located along the outer edge of the developing regions. Four of the last five requests have received no response. The last RFP has had some submittals. These submittals were expected to be opened during the last quarter but were delayed. They were opened during the current quarter. After review, the submittals were rejected due to extremely high costs. Historically, there have been 45 requirements paid and now due in the MOU program in Catawba 03050103. Of these, 34 have been stream requirements, nine riparian requirements and two nonriparian requirements. The MOA program currently has had no mitigation requirements in Catawba 03. CU Immediate Action Plan: The lower Catawba CU is a chronic problem and critical watershed for implementing stream- and wetland- mitigation projects due to the urban nature of the CU, local and federal laws, and flooding concerns. Also, there is very little opportunity for high- quality wetland projects. Recognizing the limitations and chronic issues associated within the Catawba 03050103 watershed, this past quarter the Program Assessment and Consistency Group ( PACG) passed mitigation guidance that allows the use of mitigation assets in Catawba 03050102 and the lower portion of Catawba 03050103 ( falling within or partially within the Southern Outer Piedmont Ecoregion) to be used to offset mitigation needs in Catawba 03050103 for either the MOU and MOA in lieu fee programs. The new policy will require a 50 percent penalty ratio when being used to address permit requirements in effect prior to the issuance of the policy. No penalty will be applied when addressing permit requirements that became effective after the issuance of the policy. To achieve the remaining outstanding mitigation requirements, the EEP is relying on a number of traditional and alternative strategies: 1. EEP Watershed Planning and Project Implementation initiated a survey of Catawba 03030102 for additional wetland- restoration opportunities. 2. Re- issuance of a request for full- delivery projects after EEP has completed its internal survey and received revised NCDOT impact Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 19 projections for the revised TIP. ( The RFP re- issuance is currently on hold pending resolution of surplus issue raised by NCDOT Board of Transportation and EEP Watershed Planning and Project Implementation efforts in locating suitable mitigation in expanded service area.) 3. Potential implementation of nontraditional projects based on the Charlotte LWP Initiative. Numerous sites identified through this planning effort have yielded nontraditional wetland- and stream-mitigation opportunities. EEP has presented these projects to the PACG and is awaiting approval of the methodology to calculate mitigation credits before proceeding with these projects. One year ago ( four quarters ago), the Non- Traditional Mitigation Steering Committee modified the EEP’s functional/ credit methodology based on the PACG and the PACG- TC’s previous comments. EEP is awaiting approval of the methodology. If the methodology is not approved soon, the identified projects will no longer be available for implementation. 4. Evaluation of the CU for wetlands- preservation opportunities that may be able to provide some mitigation credit towards the wetland deficits. EEP Planning has identified multiple preservation sites and is directing local watershed planning to identify, assess and acquire these sites. One project has been identified during the current quarter that will yield 2.5 mitigation credits. 5. Use existing assets or generate new assets in the lower portion of Catawba 03050101 for the MOU Program. EEP has approval from USACE ( reference letter May 21, 2004 from Ken Jolly to Bill Gilmore) to use wetlands assets in the lower portion of Catawba 03050101 to offset these deficits. 6. Use existing assets or generate new assets in Catawba 03050102 and the lower portion of Catawba 03050101 per the passed PACG guidance issued this past quarter. Existing wetlands in Catawba 03050102 have been utilized save for wetlands that have been earmarked to offset additional mitigation needs that may be necessary to meet NCDOT permit shortfalls associated with the NCDOT Little Sugar mitigation project. EEP is awaiting transfer of mitigation permit responsibility to EEP prior to utilizing these remaining credits to mitigate for these pre- EEP mitigation shortfalls. 7. Evaluation of wetlands restoration on Chewacla soils. EEP has discussed with USACE the possibility of pursuing wetlands restoration sites with Chewacla soil types in association with priority one stream restoration opportunities. Additional potential wetland opportunities Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 20 have been identified on the Pott Creek II mitigation site. The feasibility of this potential is currently being evaluated. 8. Utilize HQP assets generated in the MOA program to offset riparian wetland restoration equivalent needs for the MOU program. PACG and NCDOT authorization is needed to allow for these credits to be sold and used by the MOU program. CHOWAN 03010204 Outstanding Mitigation Required Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent Streams 0 0 Riparian 0 0 Non- Riparian 0.022 0.022 Coastal Marsh 0 0 Background: The Chowan river basin has historically had little activity for the EEP’s mitigation programs. Only one payment has ever been made in the river basin in history of the programs. The payment became due this quarter totaling 0.044 nonriparian mitigation credits. CU Immediate Action Plan: The EEP Watershed Planning and Project Implementation group has been assigned to identify a nonriparian mitigation project suitable to meet the current and long- term mitigation needs in this watershed. Unfortunately, due to excessive surplus located in the Pasquotank River Basin, the WPPI initiative has been placed on hold pending the discussions between the regulatory agencies, NCDENR, and NCDOT regarding the potential use of these credits to meet permit needs in the Chowan River Basin. More than 1,110 nonriparian surplus credits exist in the Pasquotank River Basin that could be used to offset mitigation needs. CU Long- Range Action Plan: Long range needs in this watershed are projected to be 9.14 nonriparian mitigation credits. EEP Watershed Planning and Project Implementation group has been assigned to identify and implement projects sufficient to meet long- term needs. As stated above, this initiative is currently on hold pending the outcome of the interagency surplus- asset discussions. Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 21 HIWASSEE 06020002 Outstanding Mitigation Required Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent Streams 4,372 0 Riparian 0.82 0 Non- Riparian 0 0 Coastal Marsh 0 0 Background: The Hiwassee River Basin has historically been an area of limited activity for EEP. As a result it has taken the program more time to develop restoration projects in this area. At the end of the transition period on July 22, 2005, EEP did not have the restoration available to supplement the HQP used to cover one permit during the transition. Until the restoration has been instituted, EEP is continuing to cover the affected permit with 10: 1 HQP. ( Note There was a database error recording the total number of credits associated with and debited from the Trout Cove Branch project located in Hiwassee 06020002 during the current quarter- the total amount of credits is currently 3,900 rather than 1,876 as reported within this report. This error will be corrected in the next quarterly report.) CU Immediate Action Plan: Currently, EEP has identified three projects representing 15,240 stream credits and 6.13 riparian wetland credits and 3.76 nonriparian credits. EEP is continuing to negotiate with the landowners on two of these projects representing 10,740 stream credits, 1.13 riparian credits, and 2.26 nonriparian credits. If these projects are acquired and instituted, EEP will have sufficient stream and wetland credits in this CU. If this negotiation fails, EEP is prepared to issue a full- delivery request to meet the outstanding mitigation need. CU Long- Range Action Plan: EEP is developing a LWP in this CU in partnership with the Hiwassee River Watershed Coalition to continue to develop quality restoration opportunities to meet current and future needs in this CU. LITTLE TENNESSEE 06010203 Outstanding Mitigation Required Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent Streams 144 144 Riparian 0 0 Non- Riparian 0 0 Coastal Marsh 0 0 Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 22 Background: This CU has historically had little activity. EEP currently only has one permit requirement in this CU. This permit requirement had previously been met by the Frizell Full Delivery Project. However an Indian burial ground was discovered during the current quarter on Frizell that prevents the implementation of the project. Consequently, the Frizell stream- restoration project has been terminated. CU Action Plan: The EEP Watershed Planning and Project Implementation group has been assigned the task of identifying a stream and riparian wetland project designed to meet the current and future stream- and wetland- mitigation needs in this CU. LUMBER 03040203 Outstanding Mitigation Required Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent Streams 9,318 0 Riparian 0 0 Non- Riparian 0 0 Coastal Marsh 0 0 Background: Two projects in this watershed were dropped during the current quarter resulting in the outstanding stream- mitigation needs: Middle Swamp Creek and Black Gum Creek. The Middle Swamp Creek was a very large stream restoration located in the coastal plain. The design and permitting process for this project had been difficult but permits had been acquired for implementation of the project. However, based on the Feb. 7 – 8, 2007 Coastal Issues Forum, the resulting change in coastal stream- restoration guidance and as the difficulty expected in constructing this project, a decision was made to terminate this project. The project would have resulted in the removal of some forested riparian areas as well as the establishment of some stream channels in locations where it was difficult to determine if stream channels had historically existed. The Black Gum Creek was also a very large stream- mitigation project that had been secured via the full-delivery process. The project was intended to produce 10,000 warm stream credits. The full- delivery provider was unable to implement the project due to the new coastal stream- restoration guidance. These decisions to drop these projects ( and replace them with other projects) reflect the joint collaborative efforts on the part of EEP and the regulatory agencies to continue to improve the type and quality of stream- restoration efforts in the coastal plain. Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 23 LUMBER 03040206 Outstanding Mitigation Required Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent Streams 0 0 Riparian 0.14 0 Non- Riparian 1.113 0.02 Coastal Marsh 0 0 Background: The Lumber 03040206 CU has seen limited activity since the inception of the Wetlands Restoration Program in 1998. EEP has four MOU requirements and one MOA requirement in Lumber 03040206, including two riparian and three nonriparian. The magnitude of all five requirements is relatively small in comparison to other areas of this river basin. One of the three MOU riparian- and nonriparian- wetland requirements due is being partially met. The MOA program had one nonriparian wetland requirement in this CU that is covered with a riparian asset. CU Action Plan: Due to low activity in this CU in the MOA program and no new activity for the MOU program, EEP has not initiated a full LWP, and the amount of current and anticipated future impacts does not warrant initiating that action. EEP has identified one available mitigation site in the CU; however, the credits generated by the site are not sufficient to meet needs for both the MOU and MOA programs. EEP will propose that the PACG invoke the small impacts policy for the nonriparian wetland requirements approved in the amendment to the MOU signed on March 8, 2007. Currently, there are no riparian wetland assets in an adjacent CU. EEP staff will continue to actively search in the CU for suitable areas to conduct a small- to medium- sized mitigation site for current and future needs. However, due to the surplus- assets issues associated with adjacent CUs, procurement and implementation for future MOA mitigation needs within Lumber 03040206 is currently suspended pending resolution of the interagency surplus- assets discussions. LUMBER 03040207 Outstanding Mitigation Required Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent Streams 15 0 Riparian 0.03 0 Non- Riparian 0 0 Coastal Marsh 0 0 Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 24 Background: Lumber 03040207 currently has 15 stream credit and 0.03 riparian credit shortfalls to meet current regulatory requirements. CU Immediate Action Plan: The Watershed Planning and Project Implementation Group has been assigned to identify and implement a stream project that generates a minimum of 1,846 stream credits and 4.21 riparian wetland credits. These amounts represent the total needed to meet current outstanding needs plus all future projected needs within the CU for the current TIP. NEUSE 03020201 Outstanding Mitigation Required Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent Streams 874 614 Riparian 0 0 Non- Riparian 0 0 Coastal Marsh 0 0 Background: Neuse 03020201 is one of the most active areas in North Carolina where EEP provides mitigation. Consequently, EEP is heavily involved in watershed-planning and restoration- project development. Historically, EEP has been highly successful at meeting all the mitigation needs in this CU. The current nonconformance is associated with a project falling off of the asset list due to an option expiring. Property acquisition is continuing and this project is expected to be acquired soon. CU Immediate Action Plan: Completed acquisition of the project that had the expired option will bring the CU back into conformance. EEP has in development 19,033 stream credits, 10.20 riparian credits and 0.10 nonriparian credits associated with three identified projects. EEP has also initiated procurement of an additional 18,100 stream credits through the existing LWPs. EEP also plans on utilizing 14,000 existing HQP stream credits over the next few years for MOA program needs. Due to the surplus- assets issue, EEP has suspended all MOA procurement in Neuse 03020201 pending the outcomes of the interagency discussions. The suspended amounts of mitigation include 28,600 stream credits and 10 riparian credits discussed in the preceding paragraph. Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 25 NEUSE 03020202 Outstanding Mitigation Required Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent Streams 1,981 2,985 Riparian 0 0 Non- Riparian 0 0 Coastal Marsh 0 0 Background: Neuse 03020202 had one permit requirement within the MOU program come due last quarter. EEP issued a Request for Proposals in this CU in the fourth quarter, but opening of these full- delivery projects was placed on hold pending the NCDOT surplus- assets discussions. These full- delivery projects were opened and evaluated for contracting during the current quarter. A contract award for a new full delivery project is expected to take place during the next quarter. Once the project has been awarded and instituted, this CU will once again be fully compliant. CU Immediate Action Plan: The immediate action plan is to contract one or more of the full- delivery projects within the MOU program to meet the outstanding mitigation needs. TAR- PAMLICO 03020105 Outstanding Mitigation Required Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent Streams 146 0 Riparian 0 0 Non- Riparian 0 0 Coastal Marsh 0.10 0.10 Background: The Tar- Pamlico 03020105 CU has seen virtually no activity since the inception of the Wetlands Restoration Program in 1998. Prior to 2006, the MOU program had only accepted one conservation easement as mitigation on behalf of USACE. However, recent activity has been very high: three riparian, 17 nonriparian and one coastal marsh payments have been made during the last year and came due. Although activity has been high, the magnitude is very small. The MOU program currently has one small coastal- marsh wetland requirement ( 0.2 coastal- marsh credits) that is unmet. The MOA program has one small stream and one small nonriparian requirement associated with one permit that is due. The permit’s nonriparian- mitigation needs are fully covered. The permit’s stream requirement is currently covered with 10: 1 HQP assets, but the remaining restoration requirement ( 146 stream restoration credits) is outstanding. Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 26 CU Action Plan: The primary plan for this CU had been to utilize the Full Delivery Project ( FDP) process to meet current and future stream needs. EEP had received one FDP project that was not accepted during the fourth quarter. Consequently, EEP identified the EEP Watershed Planning and Project Implementation staff to procure the remaining stream mitigation needs. EEP has already secured sufficient riparian- and nonriparian- wetland mitigation sufficient to offset all projected riparian and nonriparian mitigation needs for the seven- year TIP, and has ceased procurement for additional riparian and nonriparian mitigation until new mitigation needs are identified. For the current and future coastal- marsh mitigation needs, EEP proposed the procurement and restoration of the Collins Tract, a very large and rare potential coastal- marsh restoration project located in Pasquotank 03010205, but only a few miles from the border of the Tar- Pamlico 03020105 and Pasquotank 03010205 CU boundary. EEP has requested of the regulatory agencies that the service area for the project contain both CUs due both to its location and the projection that nearly all impacts are expected to occur at the boundary between the two CUs. The agencies submitted comments to the proposed mitigation tract during the third quarter. Some agencies commented that the Collins Tract may be considered creation rather than restoration. Additionally, during the fourth quarter, the forecasted coastal- marsh need ( approximately 14.86 total coastal- marsh credits) in this CU is currently in question as NCDOT may be required to produce on- site mitigation rather than procure off- site mitigation through the EEP. At this time, procurement of MOA mitigation needs for stream and coastal marsh is on hold pending the Tri- Party surplus- assets mitigation discussions. The Tar Pamlico river basin has multiple other CUs that contain surplus mitigation. Procurement of new mitigation sites within this CU are on hold until options to utilize these other assets are exhausted Since the coastal marsh needs within the MOU program were also intended to be met with portions of the Collins Tract, meeting this requirement is also delayed. Note: The Bonner Bridge project is a future MOA projected impact. The PACG-TC is looking at coastal issues that may affect this CU in the future. The Bonner Bridge spans both Tar- Pamlico 03020105 and Pasquotank 03010205 CUs. WHITE OAK 03030001 Outstanding Mitigation Required Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent Streams 0 0 Riparian 0 0 Non- Riparian 0.2 0.2 Coastal Marsh 0 0 Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 27 Background: EEP currently has significant amounts of unused nonriparian mitigation credits in White Oak 03030001 originating from the Hoffman Forest Mitigation Bank. Unfortunately, the Hoffman Forest Mitigation Bank has a service area restricted to Onslow County impacts. CU Action Plan: EEP has assigned the Watershed Planning and Project Implementation group to identify and acquire one nonriparian credit. To address projected future needs, the Watershed Planning and Project Implementation already identified two projects representing 3,000 stream credits and five riparian credits and is looking for additional projects that would add an extra 5.39 riparian credits. However, due to the surplus- asset issue, procurement of wetland- and stream- mitigation sites for the MOA program is on hold until further notice for the White Oak river basin. The White Oak LWP is also examining potential alternative, nontraditional forms of mitigation that may be appropriate for this watershed. YADKIN 03040105 Outstanding Mitigation Required Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent Streams 0 0 Riparian 4.27 0 Non- Riparian 0 0 Coastal Marsh 0 0 Background: Yadkin 03040105 is similar in some ways to Catawba 03050103. Yadkin 03040105 does not have many wetlands- restoration opportunities present within the CU. It is also experiencing some of the same development pressures that are present in the lower Catawba. Yadkin 03040105 includes portions of Charlotte, Huntersville, Mooresville, Davidson, Concord, Kannapolis, Monroe, Mint Hill and other smaller towns. It should be considered a CU of concern for future wetlands- restoration efforts. Yadkin 0304105 is different than the lower Catawba in that it has more rural landscape remaining within the watershed and is larger. EEP has invested heavily in local watershed planning in the Yadkin 0304105 and expects to generate both stream and wetlands projects from these endeavors in the future. Due to the magnitude of mitigation needs projected in this CU, EEP has also used the full- delivery process to secure mitigation. CU Action Plan: Historically, the action plan in this CU included the significant use of the FDP program to secure stream and wetland mitigation needs due to the extreme Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 28 magnitude of need. These efforts have been very successful in generating stream restoration, but not wetland restoration. The most recent RFP had submittals containing five riparian wetland credits and 0.5 nonriparian credits that were not awarded due to high costs. To develop mitigation assets in Yadkin 05, EEP is using a multi- pronged approach. EEP has expanded the Rocky River LWP to Phase IV; plans to acquire and implement existing Tier II and III projects; identify and implement using the Design- Bid- Build DBB) process at least five additional stream- restoration projects, and two riparian- wetland projects; and maximize use of existing HQP credits. A LWP is being initiated in the Goose Creek watershed in partnership with resource agencies to generate mitigation opportunities that will also address endangered- species issues. The EEP Monitoring Section is also investigating whether the Cato project produced nonriparian or riparian credits as a component of the priority one stream- restoration project. Finally, EEP plans to issue another full- delivery RFP for the CU. The full- delivery RFP release date is on hold pending the results of the success of acquiring identified DBB stream and wetland projects. The proposal to issue another RFP has also been placed on hold due to the pending Tri- Party surplus- assets discussions. Due to the surplus- asset issue, procurement of wetland- only mitigation sites for the MOA program is on hold until further notice for the Yadkin River Basin. SECTION VII: FUTURE CONFORMANCE As noted throughout the report, many mitigation procurement initiatives have been placed on hold pending the ongoing discussions between the Tri- Party agencies on the issue of surplus assets. These procurement holds may result in future nonconformance with the terms of the MOA or MOU permit requirements. Consequently, permit compliance is expected to continue to drop slightly while these discussions are ongoing and new permit requirements come online. However, the magnitude of this drop is moderated by the amount of advanced mitigation already completed for Year 5 and 6 projected mitigation needs. EEP is working closely with the Tri- Party agencies to identify the appropriate course of action regarding mitigation procurement and utilization of existing assets to meet existing and future needs. For the most part, these procurement holds will only affect the MOA mitigation program. Procurement of mitigation for the MOU mitigation program will continue. Both programs are affected by the delays where RFPs have been placed on hold or a single project had been identified to meet MOU and MOA mitigation program needs. Additionally, in March 2007 Congress re- authorized the USACE’s nationwide permit authority. USACE initiated a public- review process for revisions to its general permit conditions, causing a three- month hiatus in USACE’s permit processing. This delay has affected six EEP projects, some of which were Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 29 delayed while the public- review process ran its course. Others were held by EEP, pending the outcome of the public- review process. EEP is expediting other steps in the project- permitting and construction process for these six projects, and is hopeful that ultimately the projects will experience only small delays in final implementation. However, it is possible that the program will miss season- specific planting windows resulting in delayed mitigation and temporary non- conformance in these CUs in the 2008 – 2009 time frame. The projects affected by the permitting delays were: Mitigation assets estimated as of June 30, 2007. All are subject to change. Project name CU Stream Wetlands Buffer Adkins Branch ( phase 11) Neuse 03020202 10,137 feet 21.55 acres Brock Neuse 03020204 1,850 feet 1.65 acres 6.88 acres Johnson- Dale Neuse 03020203 1,500 feet 6 acres Oakley Crossroads Tar- Pam 03020103 3,800 feet 6.30 acres 20.9 acres Stallings Neuse 03020204 4,476 feet 34 acres 43.95 acres Tate Farm New River 05050001 30,285 feet 11.60 acres Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 30 Appendix A: EEP Gross Asset List of Tier 1 Stream and Wetland Restoration, Enhancement, Creation, and Preservation Sites Alphabetically ( High Quality Preservation Sites are not listed in table below). GIS ID Project Name Tier River Basin 8- digit CU Stream Restoration Stream Enhancment I Stream Enhancement II Stream Preservation Riparian Restoration Riparian Creation Riparian Enhancement Riparian Preservation Nonriparian Restoration Nonriparian Creation Nonriparian Enhancement Nonriparian Preservation Coastal Marsh Restoration Coastal Marsh Creation Coastal Marsh Enhancement Coastal Marsh Preservation Stream Buffer 92546 601 North Property 1 YADKIN 03040105 3,000 92545 601 West Property 1 YADKIN 03040105 4,500 9 Abbott 1 NEUSE 03020201 584 6 ABC 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020104 2,375 101.63 9.24 27.57 10.90 92488 Acre Swamp Creek 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020104 7,000 30.00 16.10 92244 Adam's Creek Sea Gate Woods 1 n/ a NEUSE 03020204 122.00 7 Adkins Branch ( Phase II) 1 NEUSE 03020202 10,137 21.55 10 Afton Run 1 YADKIN 03040105 261 92526 Anderson Swamp 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020102 12.00 7.00 92487 Armstrong Property 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020104 2,000 20.00 4.50 17 Back Creek 1 YADKIN 03040105 2,167 1,480 0.30 3.50 92666 Badin Inn 1 YADKIN 03040104 4,050 19 Bailey Fork ( EBX) ( 16- D04006) 1 CATAWBA 03050101 6,017 9,765 11.80 5.30 12.60 20 Bailey Fork II ( WRC) ( 16- D04006) 1 CATAWBA 03050101 5,500 9.50 21 Ballance Farm 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 196.27 49.65 25.35 50.00 22 Barbara Squires Site 1 CAPE FEAR 03030005 24 Beamon's Run 1 n/ a NEUSE 03020203 26 Bear Creek ( Phillips Tract) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 4,143 27 Bear Swamp Creek 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020101 1,460 2.40 28 Beaver Creek 1 YADKIN 03040101 4,266 92217 Beaverdam Creek 1 CATAWBA 03050101 12,427 567 2,603 92586 Beaverdam Creek and Trib ( Parker Site) 1 YADKIN 03040105 2,933 92530 Beaverdam Swamp 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 10,200 9.00 29 Benbow Park 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 1,122 780 32 Benson Grove 1 NEUSE 03020201 33 Bethel Church 1 YADKIN 03040101 92532 Big Cedar Creek 1 YADKIN 03040105 11,088 1,090 580 739 Big Harris Creek I 1 BROAD 03050105 2,500 500 92492 Big Harris Creek II 1 BROAD 03050105 6,000 5,000 2,000 2.00 92715 Big Warrior & Little Warrior Creek 1 YADKIN 03040101 50 36 Billy's Creek 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020101 1,901 200 2.60 38 Bishop Road ( 1 mi to CU 05) 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020104 1.00 61.60 112.60 521.00 3.30 92516 Blockhouse Creek 1 BROAD 03050105 4,450 1,410 800 5.00 92210 Blounts Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 8,000 40 Blue Mitigation Site 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 4,200 112.35 731 Bogue Sound ( Weeks Property) 1 WHITE OAK 03020106 0.18 439 Bold Run Creek 1 NEUSE 03020201 1,454 0 176 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 27.10 44 Bowman Site 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 1,500 200 2.34 46 Branson Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 2,200 47 Briles 1 YADKIN 03040103 1,446 1,182 1.00 92333 Brock 1 NEUSE 03020204 - 573 1.65 6.88 49 Brock Mill Pond 1 NEUSE 03020204 3,400 109.00 52 Brown Bark Park 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 775 2,059 53 Brown Branch 1 CATAWBA 03050101 5,107 120 92591 Brown Branch ( Willowbrook Park) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 350 2,850 92207 Brown Farm 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 24.58 3.32 92517 Brown Marsh Swamp 1 LUMBER 03040204 5,000 5.00 1 of 9 Updated 9/ 30/ 07 Appendix A: EEP Gross Asset List of Tier 1 Stream and Wetland Restoration, Enhancement, Creation, and Preservation Sites Alphabetically ( High Quality Preservation Sites are not listed in table below). GIS ID Project Name Tier River Basin 8- digit CU Stream Restoration Stream Enhancment I Stream Enhancement II Stream Preservation Riparian Restoration Riparian Creation Riparian Enhancement Riparian Preservation Nonriparian Restoration Nonriparian Creation Nonriparian Enhancement Nonriparian Preservation Coastal Marsh Restoration Coastal Marsh Creation Coastal Marsh Enhancement Coastal Marsh Preservation Stream Buffer 54 Brush Creek 1 NEW 05050001 1,350 490 1,750 55 Brushy Fork 1 YADKIN 03040101 4,400 3,000 743 Bryan Blvd/ Oakridge 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 0.00 92603 Buffalo Creek 1 NEUSE 03020201 6,100 56 Bugaboo Creek 1 YADKIN 03040101 6,230 57 Bull Farm 1 CAPE FEAR 03030006 2.18 58 Burnt Mill Creek 1 n/ a CAPE FEAR 03030007 0.80 60 Bush Island 1 LUMBER 03040203 300.00 63 Caldwell Station/ Foley/ EcoPark 1 CATAWBA 03050101 3,600 420 1.60 5.00 65 Camp Branch @ Bishop Site 1 YADKIN 03040105 1,900 1,190 4,400 7,000 1.00 7.00 66 Camp Lejune USMC 1 WHITE OAK 03030001 69 Cane Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 2,277 6.90 92325 Cane Creek 1 ROANOKE 03010104 12,720 1,232 3,499 463 92521 Cane Creek ( FD) 1 BROAD 03050105 4,470 4,860 1,670 4.40 5.00 92268 Carbonton Dam 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 90,484 70 Casey Tract 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 71 Cat Creek 1 LITTLE TENNESSEE 06010202 4,358 1,082 1,490 6.00 72 Cato 1 YADKIN 03040105 2,295 73 Caviness 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 937 11.00 77 Chapel Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 1,000 400 79 Charles Creek 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 1.16 0.60 87 Chavis Park 1 NEUSE 03020201 2,210 2.30 90 City Pond 1 YADKIN 03040201 10,667 91 Clayhill Farm 1 WHITE OAK 03020106 9,599 2,010 21.60 1.80 3.90 79.90 52.00 110.50 92 Clear Creek 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 1,200 93 Cleghorn Creek ( 16- D04010) 1 BROAD 03050105 5,167 94 Coddle Creek Tributary ( Indian Run) 1 YADKIN 03040105 1,840 1,000 1,190 742 Collington Cut 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 92205 Collins Site 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 9,786 1,070 750 96 Company Swamp 1 ROANOKE 03010107 557.43 92226 Conoconnara Swamp 1 ROANOKE 03010107 5,000 69.00 8.00 71.00 97 Corbett Tract 1 Lumber 03040207 0.00 101 Cox Property 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020104 0.00 99 Cox Site 1 NEUSE 03020201 7,263 285 25.88 16.90 105 Cross Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 2,400 92329 Crowns West 1 WHITE OAK 03030001 3,800 92547 Cutatwhiskie creek 1 CHOWAN 03010204 2,818 2,786 12.30 92269 Daniels Farm # 1 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020101 31.70 92229 Daniels Farm # 2 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020101 13.70 4.50 10.30 0.70 0.70 0.11 92543 Davis Branch 1 YADKIN 03040105 5,025 110 Deaton 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 255 13.70 117 Dismal Swamp 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 15.46 20.80 252.78 91.00 92533 Dog Bite Creek 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010108 2,410 1,235 80 119 Dowd Dairy 1 CAPE FEAR 03030005 4.85 545.33 92544 Duke Swamp 1 CHOWAN 03010203 5,000 15.00 92350 Dula Thorofare @ Bishop Site 1 YADKIN 03040104 2,568 2,900 3,200 5.60 0.94 3.20 121 Dutchman's Creek 1 NEUSE 03020201 2 of 9 Updated 9/ 30/ 07 Appendix A: EEP Gross Asset List of Tier 1 Stream and Wetland Restoration, Enhancement, Creation, and Preservation Sites Alphabetically ( High Quality Preservation Sites are not listed in table below). GIS ID Project Name Tier River Basin 8- digit CU Stream Restoration Stream Enhancment I Stream Enhancement II Stream Preservation Riparian Restoration Riparian Creation Riparian Enhancement Riparian Preservation Nonriparian Restoration Nonriparian Creation Nonriparian Enhancement Nonriparian Preservation Coastal Marsh Restoration Coastal Marsh Creation Coastal Marsh Enhancement Coastal Marsh Preservation Stream Buffer 122 Dye Branch I Stormwater BMP 1 n/ a YADKIN 03040105 92255 Dye Branch II Stream Restoration 1 YADKIN 03040105 3,000 123 East Tarboro Canal 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020103 2,989 1,876 8.27 125 Elizabeth City State BMP 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 0 92665 Elk Branch 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010108 3,075 2,540 126 Elk Shoals RFP* 1 CATAWBA 03050101 4,813 563 5.30 127 Ellerbee Creek 1 NEUSE 03020201 6,279 12.00 92520 Ellington Branch 1 ROANOKE 03010106 5,000 128 Ephemeral Pool 1 LUMBER 03040203 92552 Farrar Dairy 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 11,531 800 150 33.30 39.90 43.20 92185 Five Mile Branch 1 YADKIN 03040102 17,595 4.00 4.00 138 Fletcher- Meritor site 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 4,000 10.00 440 Flintrock Farm 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 3,000 30.00 92486 Floogie Site 1 ROANOKE 03010107 10,251 25.00 139 Forest Hills 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 2,960 92609 Four Mile Creek - DBB 1 CATAWBA 03050103 2,223 141 Freedom Park 1 CATAWBA 03050103 4,400 142 Friedburg Marsh 1 Yadkin 03040101 92228 Gatlin Swamp 1 ROANOKE 03010107 125.00 143 Gibson Pond 1 Yadkin 03040201 36.70 144 Gillespie Golf Course 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 2,709 3,086 854 Glade Creek 1 NEW 05050001 2,705 125 813 0.33 92343 Glade Creek II 1 NEW 05050001 2,500 1.00 1.50 92206 Glen Raven 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 3,290 700 145 Goldsboro Housing Authority 1 NEUSE 03020201 2,100 3.54 147 Goose Creek 1 NEUSE 03020201 1,800 3.00 92710 Goose Creek ( Earl Haigler) 1 YADKIN 03040105 92709 Goose Creek ( Greene site) 1 YADKIN 03040105 0 148 Goshen Swamp 1 CAPE FEAR 03030007 0.00 92219 Gray Farm 1 CATAWBA 03050101 7,610 15.70 671 Greenbriar Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 3,028 2,896 4,000 7.64 7.50 153 Gregory 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020102 6,500 75.00 155 Grimesland ( Phase II) 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020103 48.80 156 Grimesland Site ( Phase I) 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020103 7.80 348.00 158 Grove Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030007 6.00 10.20 352.00 3.90 7.60 716 Gurley 1 NEUSE 03020203 0 162 Hall Branch 1 YADKIN 03040201 2,000 2.50 163 Hammock's State Park 1 WHITE OAK 03020106 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 165 Hanging Rock Creek ( A3) 1 WATAUGA 06010103 2,767 279 92230 Harrell Site 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020101 6,987 15.00 18.90 167 Haw Branch ( 16- D04015) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030007 10,000 25.00 92316 Haw River Bouchard 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 30.00 92238 Haw River Swamp I 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 12.00 168 Haw River Swamp II ( 16- D04011) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 14.70 2.50 18.00 169 Haw River Tract 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 80.00 719 Haw's Run 1 CAPE FEAR 03030007 6.72 25.00 171.00 49.36 99.00 11.00 170 Heath Dairy Road 1 YADKIN 03040103 8,700 2,900 700 3 of 9 Updated 9/ 30/ 07 Appendix A: EEP Gross Asset List of Tier 1 Stream and Wetland Restoration, Enhancement, Creation, and Preservation Sites Alphabetically ( High Quality Preservation Sites are not listed in table below). GIS ID Project Name Tier River Basin 8- digit CU Stream Restoration Stream Enhancment I Stream Enhancement II Stream Preservation Riparian Restoration Riparian Creation Riparian Enhancement Riparian Preservation Nonriparian Restoration Nonriparian Creation Nonriparian Enhancement Nonriparian Preservation Coastal Marsh Restoration Coastal Marsh Creation Coastal Marsh Enhancement Coastal Marsh Preservation Stream Buffer 172 Helms 1 YADKIN 03040105 1,400 0.40 175 High Vista 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 1,500 2,300 176 Hillcrest Bay ( 16- D04011) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 15.00 177 Hillsdale Park 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 5,302 138 92523 Holly Grove 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 13,350 5,940 180 Hominy Swamp Creek 1 NEUSE 03020203 2,232 2.60 92251 Hoppers Creek - Melton Farm 1 CATAWBA 03050101 3,500 800 1.00 182 Horsepen Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 1.77 183 Howell Woods 1 NEUSE 03020201 5,251 34.00 4.00 64.00 38.00 5.50 184 Huskanaw Swamp 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020103 23.60 185 Indian Creek 1 CATAWBA 03050102 0 192 Irwin Creek Whitehurst Road 1 CATAWBA 03050103 1,500 1.50 1.04 194 Jacksonville Country Club 1 WHITE OAK 03030001 3,272 376 92550 Jarmans Oak 1 WHITE OAK 03030001 6,418 555 11.00 2.00 751 Jenny's Gut ( Perquimans County High School) 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 2,500 197 Johnson Site ( Hunting Creek) 1 YADKIN 03040102 2,200 661 Johnson- Dale Stream Restoration ( Payne Dale) 1 NEUSE 03020203 1,500 6.00 198 Jones Creek ( 16- D04020) 1 YADKIN 03040201 3,068 5,150 25.00 2.70 92614 Jordan Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 5,000 199 Jumping Run Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 4,480 67.00 200 Jumping Run Creek 1 WHITE OAK 03020106 3.00 201 Juniper Bay 1 LUMBER 03040203 590.08 204 Ken- Cox ( Millstone Creek) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 3,300 2.00 4.55 205 Kentwood Park 1 NEUSE 03020201 1,070 350 2.90 206 Key Branch 1 YADKIN 03040104 36.80 3.60 208 Kings Creek 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 2,300 209 Knobs Creek 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 19.00 210 La Grange 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 2.00 4.00 212 Lake Wheeler 1 NEUSE 03020201 0.00 92707 Laxon Creek( Racey site) 1 WATAUGA 06010103 1,160 215 Lengyel 1 NEUSE 03020204 5.64 4.70 733 Lewis Creek 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 2,000 219 Lick Creek ( 16- D04011) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 9,500 92372 Little Alamance Creek ( Burlington Park) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 2,850 221 Little Beaver Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 5,298 4.75 0.97 627 Little Contentnea Creek ( Farmville C. C.) 1 NEUSE 03020203 980 1,330 6.70 224 Little Grassy Creek 1 ROANOKE 03010102 5,000 12,300 92651 Little Ivy Creek ( Barnhill Site) 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 1,200 92192 Little Lick Creek 1 NEUSE 03020201 2,750 300 1.40 1.53 1.00 5.24 225 Little McQueen 1 LUMBER 03040203 0.00 856 Little Pine Creek II 1 NEW 05050001 2,700 4.00 226 Little River 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 4,400 5.00 50.00 42.00 228 Little Sugar Creek I 1 CATAWBA 03050103 0.00 749 Little Troublesome 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 2,188 2,754 1.90 4.50 92534 Little White Oak Creek 1 BROAD 03050105 18,200 4 of 9 Updated 9/ 30/ 07 Appendix A: EEP Gross Asset List of Tier 1 Stream and Wetland Restoration, Enhancement, Creation, and Preservation Sites Alphabetically ( High Quality Preservation Sites are not listed in table below). GIS ID Project Name Tier River Basin 8- digit CU Stream Restoration Stream Enhancment I Stream Enhancement II Stream Preservation Riparian Restoration Riparian Creation Riparian Enhancement Riparian Preservation Nonriparian Restoration Nonriparian Creation Nonriparian Enhancement Nonriparian Preservation Coastal Marsh Restoration Coastal Marsh Creation Coastal Marsh Enhancement Coastal Marsh Preservation Stream Buffer 92327 Lloyd Site 1 WHITE OAK 03030001 4,750 3.30 3.10 92515 Logan Creek 1 SAVANNAH 03060101 3,310 1,600 0 3,115 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 231 Long Creek 1 CATAWBA 03050101 1.64 233 Long Swamp 1 Lumber 03040203 0.00 234 Louisburg ( UT to Tar River) 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020101 1,937 3.05 236 Lowell Mill ( 16- D04008) 1 NEUSE 03020201 34,990 237 Lower Creek 1 CATAWBA 03050101 3,500 239 Mallard Creek 1 YADKIN 03040105 239 Mallard Creek 1 CATAWBA 03050103 0.00 715 Mann's Harbor 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 92248 Mark's Creek TESC 1 NEUSE 03020201 3,693 17.90 241 Mary's Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 2,096 5.40 718 Mashoe's Road 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 29.32 130.94 92328 Mason Farm 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020105 16.00 20.00 443 McCain Property 1 YADKIN 03040103 2,445 242 McDonald's Pond 1 YADKIN 03040201 2,969 770 4,410 17.70 4.20 19.00 92604 McGowan Creek 1 NEUSE 03020201 30.80 243 McIntyre Creek @ Hornets Nest Park 1 CATAWBA 03050101 4,800 1.50 17.07 244 McIntyre Property 1 CAPE FEAR 03030005 12.30 9.02 85.76 92573 McKee Creek 1 YADKIN 03040105 1,650 4,500 245 McLeansville 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 6.00 92351 Meadowbranch ( Fivemile Branch) 1 LUMBER 03040203 25.00 30.00 92706 Meat Camp Creek ( Miller site) 1 WATAUGA 06010103 652 247 Meredell Farm Site 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 3,865 4,704 5,136 11.80 92703 Middle Fork Creek ( Phillips/ Willis) 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 4,480 250 Mildred Woods 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020103 128.50 8.00 251 Mill Branch 1 LUMBER 03040206 3,282 1,750 0.25 0.44 35.80 1.50 253 Mill Creek ( formerly Uwharrie Heritage) 1 YADKIN 03040103 3,598 1,912 14,675 3.00 255 Mineral Springs Branch ( Burnt Mill Creek) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030007 1,190 1,350 256 Mocassin Creek 1 NEUSE 03020203 311 0.38 4.93 43.21 3.00 92227 Modlin Site 1 ROANOKE 03010107 40.00 725 Moore Property 1 NEUSE 03020201 7.10 30.90 4.90 6.60 92314 Mooresville School Site - Rocky River 1 YADKIN 03040105 3,430 1.00 92527 Morgan Creek 1 BROAD 03050105 8,171 5,216 4,309 92240 Morgan Creek ( Bolin Stewardship Tract) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 3,575 92531 Morgan Creek ( French Broad) 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010106 4,857 715 5.00 258 Morgan Creek Floodplain 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 19.00 260 Mud Creek 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 15.60 737 Muddy Creek ( Randolph/ Duncan Properties) 1 CATAWBA 03050101 3,500 261 Naked Creek 1 YADKIN 03040101 3,000 92330 New Light Creek ( NCDOT) 1 NEUSE 03020201 92497 Newfound Creek 1 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 5,000 6,600 800 441 Nicholls Farm ( Troublesome Creek) 1 CHOWAN 03010203 1,700 3,300 15.00 5.00 10.00 92611 North Muddy Creek 1 CATAWBA 03050101 5,014 10.50 1.25 4.30 2.40 271 North River 1 n/ a WHITE OAK 03020106 250.00 5 of 9 Updated 9/ 30/ 07 Appendix A: EEP Gross Asset List of Tier 1 Stream and Wetland Restoration, Enhancement, Creation, and Preservation Sites Alphabetically ( High Quality Preservation Sites are not listed in table below). GIS ID Project Name Tier River Basin 8- digit CU Stream Restoration Stream Enhancment I Stream Enhancement II Stream Preservation Riparian Restoration Riparian Creation Riparian Enhancement Riparian Preservation Nonriparian Restoration Nonriparian Creation Nonriparian Enhancement Nonriparian Preservation Coastal Marsh Restoration Coastal Marsh Creation Coastal Marsh Enhancement Coastal Marsh Preservation Stream Buffer 272 Northgate Park ( Ellerbe) 1 NEUSE 03020201 1,800 5.00 273 Oakley Crossroads 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020103 3,800 2.94 2.25 1.11 20.90 274 Oakwood Cemetary 1 NEUSE 03020201 1,300 92708 Obids Creek ( Wild Site) 1 NEW 05050001 1,819 275 Open Springs 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 4,520 4.70 92700 Paint Fork Creek( Brigmon Site) 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 5,175 92702 Paint Fork Creek( Fosson) 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 1,700 276 Paschal GC ( Richland Ck) 1 NEUSE 03020201 2,900 5.14 279 Payne Dairy 1 CATAWBA 03050101 5,177 470 1,350 6.40 25.40 280 Pea Island 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 92469 Peeler Creek 1 YADKIN 03040101 2,400 1,500 1,000 281 Pembroke Creek I 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 282 Pembroke Creek II 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 - 0.09 283 Perry Property ( UT to Pembroke Creek) 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 4,400 17.00 6.00 1 Philips 1 NEUSE 03020201 92518 Pinch Gut Tributary 1 ROANOKE 03010103 10,000 92607 Plemmons- Kirkpatrick Spring Creek WRC 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 680 92549 Plum Creek 1 LUMBER 03040207 80.00 286 Pott Creek II 1 CATAWBA 03050102 10,054 92548 Powell Property 1 CHOWAN 03010203 3,310 70.00 289 Prestonwood G. C. 1 NEUSE 03020201 4,123 5.30 291 Price Park 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 1,776 292 Pridgen Flats 1 CAPE FEAR 03030006 293 Privateer Farms 1 CAPE FEAR 03030005 34,005 402.50 25.00 294 Purlear Creek 1 YADKIN 03040101 11,500 2.00 2.00 295 Purlear Creek II 1 YADKIN 03040101 2,620 1.05 0.30 92522 Puzzle Creek 1 BROAD 03050105 5,300 297 R- 2719 BA 1 NEUSE 03020202 0 92220 Reed's Creek 1 CATAWBA 03050101 4.20 2.20 301 Reedy Branch 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 3,150 303 Rich Fork FDP ( Bodenheimer- Parker) 1 YADKIN 03040103 3,000 20.00 2.00 304 Richland Creek 1 NEUSE 03020201 415 307 River Bend 1 ROANOKE 03010104 89.00 19.00 308 Rocky Branch 1 YADKIN 03040102 4,400 1.50 310 Rocky Branch ( NCSU) Phase I 1 NEUSE 03020201 311 Rocky Branch ( NCSU) Phase II 1 NEUSE 03020201 312 Roquist 1 ROANOKE 03010107 500 45.00 3,386.00 317 Rowan Branch 1 CAPE FEAR 03030006 600 10.00 67.00 92675 SALT ( Sandhill Area Land Trust) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 0 320 Sand Shoals 1 WHITE OAK 03020106 321 Sandy Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 5.68 2.90 322 Sandy Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 2,700 3.60 732 Sandy Mush ( Phase II) 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 32,320 325 Sawmill 1 NEUSE 03020204 0.28 - 1.08 0.18 0.24 0.81 92237 Second Creek Wetlands, Double Thumb 1 YADKIN 03040103 3.00 331 Seven Springs 1 NEUSE 03020202 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 92241 Sharpe Wetland Preservation 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 512 6.20 6 of 9 Updated 9/ 30/ 07 Appendix A: EEP Gross Asset List of Tier 1 Stream and Wetland Restoration, Enhancement, Creation, and Preservation Sites Alphabetically ( High Quality Preservation Sites are not listed in table below). GIS ID Project Name Tier River Basin 8- digit CU Stream Restoration Stream Enhancment I Stream Enhancement II Stream Preservation Riparian Restoration Riparian Creation Riparian Enhancement Riparian Preservation Nonriparian Restoration Nonriparian Creation Nonriparian Enhancement Nonriparian Preservation Coastal Marsh Restoration Coastal Marsh Creation Coastal Marsh Enhancement Coastal Marsh Preservation Stream Buffer 333 Sheperd's Tree 1 YADKIN 03040102 - 34 16.64 86.60 8.00 335 Silas Creek 1 YADKIN 03040101 782 3,662 336 Silver Creek ( 16- D04006) 1 CATAWBA 03050101 5,127 1,392 2,036 1,077 5.30 92218 Silver Creek- Conway 1 CATAWBA 03050101 4,520 92234 Simpson Wetland 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020104 30.00 92663 Sink Hole Creek 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010108 3,560 12,460 1,760 340 Sleepy Creek 1 NEUSE 03020202 96.40 39.20 380.00 341 Smith Creek Site 1 CAPE FEAR 03030007 0.00 343 Smith/ Austin Creek 1 NEUSE 03020201 6,178 3,982 794 32.00 344 Snow Creek 1 ROANOKE 03010103 3,850 855 345 South Buffalo Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 4.03 2.21 346 South Fork 1 CATAWBA 03050102 11,260 92701 South Fork Big Pine Creek( Charles/ McGinnis) 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 1,100 347 South Fork Hopper ( 16- D04006) 1 CATAWBA 03050101 7,213 5.10 1.00 9.90 348 South Muddy Creek ( 16- D04006) 1 CATAWBA 03050101 12,573 2,653 7.30 349 Sparta Bog 1 NEW 05050001 11.90 351 Speight Branch 1 NEUSE 03020201 1.00 1.22 19.00 353 Spring Branch 1 CAPE FEAR 03030007 0.00 354 Spring Valley Park 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 0 357 Stallings 1 NEUSE 03020204 4,159 5.30 5.50 17.00 43.20 360 Starmount Forest CC 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 0 360 Starmount Park 1 Cape Fear 03030002 363 Stillhouse Creek 1 NEUSE 03020201 1,391 2.00 364 Stone Mountain 1 YADKIN 03040101 5,745 2,576 1.62 365 Stonebridge 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 6,240 8.60 92556 Stricker Branch 1 YADKIN 03040105 3,000 366 Sturgeon City ( Phase I) 1 WHITE OAK 03030001 0.35 2.69 367 Sturgeon City ( Phase II) 1 WHITE OAK 03030001 2.50 368 Suck Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 2,963 7.80 369 Sussman's Park 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 370 Suther ( Dutch Buffalo Creek) 1 YADKIN 03040105 450 3,700 4,400 14.87 10.09 8.59 92249 Swift Creek Watershed Wetlands 1 NEUSE 03020201 65.20 92211 Tarlton Swamp 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 3,221 826 255 6.80 2.40 372 Tate Farm 1 NEW 05050001 1,880 1,202 18,288 16,204 2.36 4.52 0.02 92524 Thompson's Fork and Tributary 1 CATAWBA 03050101 5,000 4.30 92664 Three Mile Creek - Restoration Systems 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010108 6,764 210 5,865 1.30 2.00 379 Tick Creek ( Condoret Tract) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 3,011 92557 Timberlake ( Great Dismal Swamp) 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 5,000 92528 Tributary to Reedy Fork Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 6,800 500 388 Trout Cove Branch 1 HIWASSEE 06020002 1,876 389 Tucker Farm 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 392 Tulula Bog 1 LITTLE TENNESSEE 06010204 2,269 1,101 52.36 394 Underhill 1 NEUSE 03020201 395 Upper UT to Cane Creek ( Picard) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 6,604 92347 UT Bear Creek ( Weaver/ McLeod property) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 4,877 0.39 11.00 7 of 9 Updated 9/ 30/ 07 Appendix A: EEP Gross Asset List of Tier 1 Stream and Wetland Restoration, Enhancement, Creation, and Preservation Sites Alphabetically ( High Quality Preservation Sites are not listed in table below). GIS ID Project Name Tier River Basin 8- digit CU Stream Restoration Stream Enhancment I Stream Enhancement II Stream Preservation Riparian Restoration Riparian Creation Riparian Enhancement Riparian Preservation Nonriparian Restoration Nonriparian Creation Nonriparian Enhancement Nonriparian Preservation Coastal Marsh Restoration Coastal Marsh Creation Coastal Marsh Enhancement Coastal Marsh Preservation Stream Buffer 152 UT Green Mill Run/ Greenville Country Club 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020103 814 3,979 0.90 3.30 92383 UT Rocky River - Harris Road Middle 1 YADKIN 03040105 2,180 2.00 2.00 92598 UT to Back Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 3,622 92596 UT to Bald Creek 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010108 1,500 1,250 2,000 397 UT to Barnes Creek ( HurleySite) 1 YADKIN 03040103 2,975 1,000 1.00 3.12 92719 UT to Bear Creek ( Phillips) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 694 1,070 857 UT to Crab Creek 1 NEW 05050001 3,908 2,669 8.80 0.40 1.50 10.90 0.00 434 UT to Crooked Creek/ Speas Property 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020101 2,267 210 2.80 10.80 92712 Ut to Goose Creek( Haigler & Rowell) 1 YADKIN 03040105 92711 Ut to Goose Creek( Haigler/ Price) 1 YADKIN 03040105 92713 Ut to Goose Creek( Sasser/ Carriker) 1 YADKIN 03040105 92714 Ut to Goose Creek( Williams/ Matlock) 1 YADKIN 03040105 92471 UT to Hauser Creek 1 YADKIN 03040101 2,300 747 UT to Haw River 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 10,150 1,000 371 UT to Hendricks Creek ( Tarboro Canal) 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020103 1,300 4.00 181 UT to Indian Creek ( Hoover) 1 CATAWBA 03050102 1,350 1,200 92345 UT to Jumping Run Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 3,000 70.00 92705 Ut to Laxon Creek ( Carp site) 1 WATAUGA 06010103 538 290 UT to Lilliput Creek ( Hog Branch Ponds) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030005 3,238 20.45 7.83 96.46 87.74 314 UT to Little Coharie Creek ( Roseboro Site) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030006 1,630 700 92704 Ut to Peak Creek ( Bare site) 1 NEW 05050001 2,183 0.00 402 UT to Rocky River ( Smith Tract) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 1,335 955 9.20 403 UT to Sandy Creek ( Williams Tract) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 2,590 3.57 435 UT to South Fork Creek ( Hadley- Newlin) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 6,000 405 UT to South Fork Creek ( Stephens) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 4,500 847 UT to Uwharrie 1 YADKIN 03040103 3,500 3,500 2.00 1.00 442 UT to West Fork of Deep River 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 1,500 3,500 6.89 860 UT to Zack's Fork 1 CATAWBA 03050101 1,500 407 Valley Fields Farm Site 1 YADKIN 03040103 9,500 300 8,730 5.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 409 Wake Forest C. C. 1 NEUSE 03020201 3,400 6.50 412 Warrior Creek 1 YADKIN 03040101 10,585 450 413 Watts Property 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 1,000 4.00 40.00 414 Wells Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 2,986 2,757 417 White Oak Creek 1 NEUSE 03020201 8.68 3.34 1.60 18.62 419 Whitehall Reserve 1 CATAWBA 03050103 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 420 Whitelace Ck* 1 NEUSE 03020202 3,693 2,208 7.70 13.00 2.40 421 Wiggins Mill 1 NEUSE 03020203 247 12.96 5.00 423 Wike Property ( Lyle Creek) 1 CATAWBA 03050101 2,326 800 92508 Wildcat Branch 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 6,500 26.00 92551 Wolf Pond 1 YADKIN 03040105 4,500 92555 Woodlawn Branch 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 5,000 92606 WRC Bowlin- Peak Creek 1 NEW 05050001 1,551 432 Zack's Fork Ck RFP* 1 CATAWBA 03050101 3,900 8 of 9 Updated 9/ 30/ 07 Appendix A: EEP Gross Asset List of Tier 1 Stream and Wetland Restoration, Enhancement, Creation, and Preservation Sites Alphabetically ( High Quality Preservation Sites are not listed in table below). GIS ID Project Name Tier River Basin 8- digit CU Stream Restoration Stream Enhancment I Stream Enhancement II Stream Preservation Riparian Restoration Riparian Creation Riparian Enhancement Riparian Preservation Nonriparian Restoration Nonriparian Creation Nonriparian Enhancement Nonriparian Preservation Coastal Marsh Restoration Coastal Marsh Creation Coastal Marsh Enhancement Coastal Marsh Preservation Stream Buffer Mitigation Sites with Executed Mitigation Banking Instruments 23 Barra Farms I 1 CAPE FEAR 03030005 160.51 25 Bear Creek 1 NEUSE 03020202 88.00 34.00 300.00 103 Croatan Mitigation Bank ( Phase I) 1 NEUSE 03020204 92.00 311.60 1,026.90 108.00 104 Croatan Mitigation Bank ( Phase II) 1 NEUSE 03020204 49.60 91.60 37.80 1,094.90 956.90 253.00 106 Dale Tract 1 CAPE FEAR 03030005 126.30 17.90 111 Deep Creek ( Harding) 1 YADKIN 03040101 5,500 30.40 12.10 118 Dismal Swamp Full- Delivery ( aka Timberlake Farm) 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 180.00 275.00 745 Eagle Brunswick 1 CAPE FEAR 03030005 133 Finley- McMillan 1 CAPE FEAR 03030007 0 398.00 135 Fisher River Mit. Bank ( Ring FDP) 1 YADKIN 03040101 2,376 25.50 8.10 0.91 151 Great Dismal Swamp 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 553.00 92259 Hoffman Forest Bank ( MOA) 1 WHITE OAK 03030001 38.00 92258 Hoffman Forest Bank ( MOU) 1 WHITE OAK 03030001 12.00 179 Homestead ( wetland) 1 YADKIN 03040102 5,500 14.60 42.20 2.80 5.50 264 Neu- Con MBI ( Alexander) 1 NEUSE 03020203 18.50 0.90 2.00 92642 Neu- Con MBI ( Casey- King) 1 NEUSE 03020202 25.00 0.00 265 Neu- Con MBI ( Marston) 1 NEUSE 03020204 6,416 30.00 8.60 128.50 263 Neu- Con MBI ( Nahunta) 1 NEUSE 03020203 10,670 97.50 0.50 11.50 0.40 31.50 92643 Neu- Con MBI ( Tull Wooten) 1 NEUSE 03020202 125.00 0.00 92644 Neu- Con MBI ( Valentine) 1 NEUSE 03020203 386.00 114.00 262 Neu- Con MBI ( Westbrook) 1 NEUSE 03020201 5,414 10.00 50.00 50.00 20.00 285 Pott Creek 1 CATAWBA 03050102 3,500 5.45 31.32 0.76 0.36 746 Rowel Branch 1 CAPE FEAR 03030005 730 Scuppernong River Mitigation Bank 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 11.35 19.00 9 of 9 Updated 9/ 30/ 07 Appendix B: Summary of EEP Gross Assets ( High Quality Preservation SItes are not listed in table below) Gross Assets Stream Restoration Stream Enhancment I Stream Enhancement II Stream Preservation Riparian Restoration Riparian Creation Riparian Enhancement Riparian Preservation Nonriparian Restoration Nonriparian Creation Nonriparian Enhancement Nonriparian Preservation Coastal Marsh Restoration Coastal Marsh Creation Coastal Marsh Enhancement Coastal Marsh Preservation Stream Buffer Broad 54,258 6,410 10,076 9,279 11.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03050105 Total 54,258 6,410 10,076 9,279 11.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 5,167 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 49,091 6,410 10,076 9,279 11.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 Cape Fear 299,819 38,058 32,010 52,704 749.77 16.20 152.99 1,015.45 910.23 0.00 227.14 496.74 9.02 0.00 85.76 0.00 114.9 03030001 Located in White Oak 03030002 Total 71,010 26,775 23,264 19,463 84.43 6.00 8.69 170.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.3 MOU 38,536 20,005 16,074 12,575 35.05 0.00 3.47 158.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.3 MOA 32,474 6,770 7,190 6,888 49.38 6.00 5.22 12.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03030003 Total 132,214 9,757 6,596 9,136 6.07 0.00 2.00 10.54 2.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 102.6 MOU 39,809 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.8 MOA 92,405 9,757 6,596 9,136 6.07 0.00 2.00 10.54 2.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 94.8 03030004 Total 46,532 826 800 23,505 191.10 0.00 92.30 223.55 15.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 12,301 826 0 12,655 87.80 0.00 52.40 42.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 34,231 0 800 10,850 103.30 0.00 39.90 181.55 15.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03030005 Total 37,243 0 0 0 419.65 0.00 25.00 20.45 679.46 0.00 114.36 87.74 9.02 0.00 85.76 0.00 0.0 MOU 3,238 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.45 7.83 0.00 96.46 87.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 34,005 0 0 0 419.65 0.00 25.00 0.00 671.63 0.00 17.90 0.00 9.02 0.00 85.76 0.00 0.0 03030006 Total 1,630 700 0 600 10.00 0.00 0.00 67.00 160.51 0.00 2.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 1,630 700 0 600 10.00 0.00 0.00 67.00 160.51 0.00 2.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03030007 Total 11,190 0 1,350 0 38.52 10.20 25.00 523.00 53.26 0.00 106.60 409.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 11,190 0 1,350 0 25.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 0 0 0 0 12.72 10.20 25.00 523.00 53.26 0.00 106.60 409.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 Catawba 145,511 8,765 14,071 4,480 41.29 34.32 15.51 11.06 2.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 113.4 03050101 Total 112,724 6,065 14,071 4,480 35.84 1.50 14.75 10.70 2.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 112.4 MOU 78,153 5,498 14,071 1,877 23.70 1.50 13.50 6.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 92.4 MOA 34,571 567 0 2,603 12.14 0.00 1.25 4.30 2.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.0 03050102 Total 26,164 1,200 0 0 5.45 31.32 0.76 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 26,164 1,200 0 0 5.45 31.32 0.76 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03050103 Total 6,623 1,500 0 0 0.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.0 MOU 6,623 1,500 0 0 0.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.0 MOA 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 Chowan 11,128 1,700 0 6,086 97.30 0.00 0.00 15.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03010203 Total 8,310 1,700 0 3,300 85.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 8,310 1,700 0 3,300 85.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03010201 Total 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03010202 Total 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03010204 Total 2,818 0 0 2,786 12.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 2,818 0 0 2,786 12.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 French Broad 84,821 25,135 2,340 10,340 16.30 0.00 17.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 River Basin Cataloging Unit 1 of 4 Updated 9/ 30/ 07 Appendix B: Summary of EEP Gross Assets ( High Quality Preservation SItes are not listed in table below) Gross Assets Stream Restoration Stream Enhancment I Stream Enhancement II Stream Preservation Riparian Restoration Riparian Creation Riparian Enhancement Riparian Preservation Nonriparian Restoration Nonriparian Creation Nonriparian Enhancement Nonriparian Preservation Coastal Marsh Restoration Coastal Marsh Creation Coastal Marsh Enhancement Coastal Marsh Preservation Stream Buffer River Basin Cataloging Unit 06010105 Total 62,655 8,900 800 0 10.00 0.00 15.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 9,000 2,300 0 0 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 53,655 6,600 800 0 0.00 0.00 15.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 06010106 Total 4,857 0 0 715 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 4,857 0 0 715 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 06010108 Total 17,309 16,235 1,540 9,625 1.30 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 17,309 16,235 1,540 9,625 1.30 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 Hiwassee 1,876 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 06020002 Total 1,876 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 1,876 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 06020003 Total 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 Little Tennessee 6,627 1,082 1,490 1,101 58.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 06010202 Total 4,358 1,082 1,490 0 6.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 4,358 1,082 1,490 0 6.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 06010203 Total 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 06010204 Total 2,269 0 0 1,101 52.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 2,269 0 0 1,101 52.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 Lumber 8,282 0 0 1,750 30.00 0.25 30.44 35.80 670.08 0.00 0.00 301.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03040203 Total 0 0 0 0 25.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 590.08 0.00 0.00 300.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 0 0 0 0 25.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 590.08 0.00 0.00 300.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03040204 Total 5,000 0 0 0 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 5,000 0 0 0 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03040206 Total 3,282 0 0 1,750 0.00 0.25 0.44 35.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 3,282 0 0 1,750 0.00 0.25 0.44 35.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03040207 Total 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 80.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 80.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 Neuse 117,157 14,405 10,306 13,193 474.90 8.34 269.43 1,734.56 1,560.30 5.80 1,984.20 777.15 5.64 - 1.08 0.18 4.94 217.3 03020201 Total 82,005 7,882 8,671 9,793 87.06 8.34 66.82 241.05 98.80 4.90 0.00 20.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 124.1 MOU 38,733 7,882 8,671 6,100 37.16 4.00 64.00 135.53 1.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 117.5 MOA 43,273 0 0 3,693 49.90 4.34 2.82 105.52 97.20 4.90 0.00 20.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.6 03020202 Total 10,137 3,693 2,208 0 192.10 0.00 86.20 680.00 25.00 0.00 0.00 125.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.0 MOU 0 3,693 2,208 0 7.70 0.00 13.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.4 MOA 10,137 0 0 0 184.40 0.00 73.20 680.00 25.00 0.00 0.00 125.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 21.6 03020203 Total 14,440 2,830 0 0 110.84 0.00 10.43 429.21 30.00 0.90 0.40 147.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18.3 MOU 2,232 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.6 2 of 4 Updated 9/ 30/ 07 Appendix B: Summary of EEP Gross Assets ( High Quality Preservation SItes are not listed in table below) Gross Assets Stream Restoration Stream Enhancment I Stream Enhancement II Stream Preservation Riparian Restoration Riparian Creation Riparian Enhancement Riparian Preservation Nonriparian Restoration Nonriparian Creation Nonriparian Enhancement Nonriparian Preservation Coastal Marsh Restoration Coastal Marsh Creation Coastal Marsh Enhancement Coastal Marsh Preservation Stream Buffer River Basin Cataloging Unit MOA 12,208 2,830 0 0 110.84 0.00 10.43 429.21 30.00 0.90 0.40 147.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.7 03020204 Total 10,575 0 - 573 3,400 84.90 0.00 105.98 384.30 1,406.50 0.00 1,983.80 484.65 5.64 - 1.08 0.18 4.94 50.9 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 122.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 10,575 0 - 573 3,400 84.90 0.00 105.98 384.30 1,406.50 0.00 1,983.80 362.65 5.64 - 1.08 0.18 4.94 50.9 New 20,596 4,486 20,038 17,017 11.16 0.40 6.02 15.23 1.00 0.00 0.00 13.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 05050001 Total 20,596 4,486 20,038 17,017 11.16 0.40 6.02 15.23 1.00 0.00 0.00 13.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 3,230 1,692 20,038 16,204 2.36 0.00 4.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 17,366 2,794 0 813 8.80 0.40 1.50 15.23 1.00 0.00 0.00 13.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 Pasquotank 15,400 2,500 0 0 396.80 0.00 21.40 68.65 1,149.13 0.00 6.00 139.32 0.00 25.35 0.00 180.94 0.0 03010205 Total 15,400 2,500 0 0 396.80 0.00 21.40 68.65 1,149.13 0.00 6.00 139.32 0.00 25.35 0.00 180.94 0.0 MOU 1,000 0 0 0 5.66 0.00 0.60 19.00 41.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 14,400 2,500 0 0 391.14 0.00 20.80 49.65 1,107.63 0.00 6.00 139.32 0.00 25.35 0.00 180.94 0.0 Roanoke 46,821 2,087 8,499 13,263 154.00 0.00 0.00 576.43 239.00 0.00 8.00 3,457.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03010102 Total 0 0 5,000 12,300 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 0 0 5,000 12,300 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03010103 Total 13,850 855 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 3,850 855 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 10,000 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03010104 Total 12,720 1,232 3,499 463 89.00 0.00 0.00 19.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 12,720 1,232 3,499 463 89.00 0.00 0.00 19.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03010106 Total 5,000 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 5,000 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03010107 Total 15,251 0 0 500 65.00 0.00 0.00 557.43 239.00 0.00 8.00 3,457.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 15,251 0 0 500 65.00 0.00 0.00 557.43 239.00 0.00 8.00 3,457.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 Savannah 3,310 1,600 0 3,115 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03060101 Total 3,310 1,600 0 3,115 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 3,310 1,600 0 3,115 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03060102 Total 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 Tar- Pamlico 35,718 9,292 2,585 0 170.64 59.40 35.10 419.90 441.03 9.24 2.95 557.79 3.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 105.7 03020101 Total 12,615 2,137 210 0 13.70 2.80 4.50 10.30 47.40 0.00 0.70 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 37.7 MOU 3,361 2,137 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 31.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.0 MOA 9,254 0 210 0 13.70 2.80 4.50 10.30 15.70 0.00 0.70 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 29.7 03020102 Total 6,500 0 0 0 87.00 0.00 7.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 6,500 0 0 0 87.00 0.00 7.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03020103 Total 7,603 7,155 0 0 2.94 56.60 23.60 348.00 129.40 0.00 2.25 9.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 36.5 MOU 0 1,300 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.0 MOA 7,603 5,855 0 0 2.94 56.60 23.60 348.00 129.40 0.00 2.25 9.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.5 03020104 Total 9,000 0 2,375 0 51.00 0.00 0.00 61.60 244.23 9.24 0.00 548.57 3.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 31.5 MOU 9,000 0 0 0 20.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.6 MOA 0 0 2,375 0 31.00 0.00 0.00 61.60 244.23 9.24 0.00 548.57 3.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.9 3 of 4 Updated 9/ 30/ 07 Appendix B: Summary of EEP Gross Assets ( High Quality Preservation SItes are not listed in table below) Gross Assets Stream Restoration Stream Enhancment I Stream Enhancement II Stream Preservation Riparian Restoration Riparian Creation Riparian Enhancement Riparian Preservation Nonriparian Restoration Nonriparian Creation Nonriparian Enhancement Nonriparian Preservation Coastal Marsh Restoration Coastal Marsh Creation Coastal Marsh Enhancement Coastal Marsh Preservation Stream Buffer River Basin Cataloging Unit 03020105 Total 0 0 0 0 16.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 0 0 0 0 16.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 Watauga 5,117 279 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 06010103 Total 5,117 279 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 5,117 279 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 White Oak 27,839 0 931 2,010 39.25 0.00 3.80 3.90 383.00 0.00 52.00 110.50 5.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03030001 Total 18,240 0 931 0 14.65 0.00 2.00 0.00 53.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 8,022 0 376 0 3.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 10,218 0 555 0 11.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 38.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03020106 Total 9,599 0 0 2,010 24.60 0.00 1.80 3.90 329.90 0.00 52.00 110.50 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 250.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 9,599 0 0 2,010 21.60 0.00 1.80 3.90 79.90 0.00 52.00 110.50 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 Yadkin 198,564 22,932 27,850 51,221 201.59 154.12 47.07 79.30 18.87 0.00 21.09 8.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03040101 Total 59,378 8,612 3,576 2,376 58.95 21.82 2.91 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 48,428 7,112 2,576 0 3.05 1.62 2.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 10,950 1,500 1,000 2,376 55.90 20.20 0.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03040102 Total 29,661 0 0 0 31.24 130.30 14.80 5.50 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 29,661 0 0 0 31.24 130.30 14.80 5.50 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03040103 Total 35,164 7,700 3,094 24,105 26.00 2.00 11.12 2.00 4.00 0.00 7.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 35,164 7,700 3,094 24,105 26.00 2.00 11.12 2.00 4.00 0.00 7.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03040104 Total 6,618 0 2,900 3,200 42.40 0.00 0.94 6.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 6,618 0 2,900 3,200 42.40 0.00 0.94 6.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03040105 Total 51,039 5,850 16,280 11,980 0.30 0.00 7.90 9.00 14.87 0.00 10.09 8.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 7,135 3,180 1,190 0 0.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 43,904 2,670 15,090 11,980 0.30 0.00 5.90 7.00 14.87 0.00 10.09 8.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03040201 Total 16,704 770 2,000 9,560 42.70 0.00 9.40 55.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 2,000 0 0.00 0.00 2.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 16,704 770 0 9,560 42.70 0.00 6.90 55.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03040202 Total 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 Grand Total 1,082,844 138,731 130,196 185,559 2,452.76 273.03 599.36 3,975.28 5,385.04 15.04 2,301.38 5,873.61 23.63 24.27 85.94 185.88 551.3 Grand Total MOU 330,884 57,980 68,554 49,411 264.93 8.62 157.99 383.68 347.73 0.00 96.46 209.76 5.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 268.7 Grand Total MOA 751,961 80,751 61,643 136,148 2,187.83 264.41 441.37 3,591.60 5,037.31 15.04 2,204.92 5,663.85 18.14 24.27 85.94 185.88 282.7 4 of 4 Updated 9/ 30/ 07 Appendix C: Net Remaining Asset Credits Stream Restoration Stream Restoration Equivalent Riparian Restoration Riparian Restoration Equivalent Nonriparian Restoration Nonriparian Restoration Equivalent Coastal Marsh Restoration Coastal Marsh Restoration Equivalent Broad 60,490 1,712.80 11.40 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 03050105 Total 60,490 1,713 11.40 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 658 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 59,832 1,713 11.40 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cape Fear 151,854 3,642 591.92 221.64 880.44 194.16 8.99 42.88 03030001 03030002 Total 22,708 1,352 50.59 8.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.45 4.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 22,707 1,352 50.14 4.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 03030003 Total 78,496 0 3.31 0.90 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 MOU 15,809 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 62,687 0 3.31 0.90 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 03030004 Total 36,642 2,170 129.76 68.15 10.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 3,797 0 43.68 1.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 32,845 2,170 86.08 66.43 10.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 03030005 Total 10,890 0 373.60 13.66 660.67 59.50 8.99 42.88 MOU 2,824 0 0.54 1.21 0.21 50.55 0.00 0.00 MOA 8,066 0 373.06 12.46 660.46 8.95 8.99 42.88 03030006 Total 1,673 120 8.93 13.40 160.02 1.09 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 1,673 120 8.93 13.40 160.02 1.09 0.00 0.00 03030007 Total 1,446 0 25.72 116.76 49.63 133.51 0.00 0.00 MOU 326 0 10.07 0.00 3.88 1.87 0.00 0.00 MOA 1,120 0 15.65 116.76 45.75 131.64 0.00 0.00 Catawba 37,448 39 13.50 1.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 03050101 Total 13,445 39 6.61 1.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 737 0 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 12,708 39 6.24 1.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 03050102 Total 23,803 0 6.89 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 23,803 0 6.89 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 03050103 Total 200 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 200 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Chowan 12,249 1,217 96.76 3.00 4.99 2.00 0.00 0.00 03010203 Total 9,443 660 84.46 3.00 4.99 2.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 9,443 660 84.46 3.00 4.99 2.00 0.00 0.00 03010201 Total 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 03010202 Total 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 03010204 Total 2,806 557 12.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 2,806 557 12.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 French Broad 76,632 2,048 10.75 8.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 06010105 Total 43,393 0 4.45 7.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 2.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 43,393 0 2.39 7.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 06010106 Total 4,491 123 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 4,491 123 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 06010108 Total 28,748 1,925 1.30 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 28,748 1,925 1.30 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hiwassee 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 06020002 Total 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 06020003 Total 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 River Basin Cataloging Unit Net Debited Asset Credits ( does not include outstanding permit requirements that have not yet been debited) 1 of 3 Updated 9/ 30/ 07 Appendix C: Net Remaining Asset Credits Stream Restoration Stream Restoration Equivalent Riparian Restoration Riparian Restoration Equivalent Nonriparian Restoration Nonriparian Restoration Equivalent Coastal Marsh Restoration Coastal Marsh Restoration Equivalent River Basin Cataloging Unit Net Debited Asset Credits ( does not include outstanding permit requirements that have not yet been debited) Little Tennessee 7,677 220 57.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 06010202 Total 5,407 0 5.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 5,407 0 5.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 06010203 Total 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 06010204 Total 2,269 220 52.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 2,269 220 52.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lumber 8,228 350 19.98 18.19 581.55 60.28 0.00 0.00 03040203 Total 0 0 15.06 11.50 524.32 60.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 0 0 15.06 11.50 524.32 60.00 0.00 0.00 03040204 Total 4,946 0 4.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 4,946 0 4.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 03040206 Total 3,282 350 0.06 6.69 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 3,282 350 0.06 6.69 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 03040207 Total 0 0 0.00 0.00 57.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 6.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 0 0 0.00 0.00 50.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 Neuse 34,709 680 409.86 446.65 1,491.55 1,118.52 5.28 1.08 03020201 Total 2,166 0 42.50 55.26 36.27 3.77 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 18.79 33.21 5.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 2,166 0 23.71 22.05 30.46 3.77 0.00 0.00 03020202 Total 8,464 0 178.55 171.71 24.62 25.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 8,464 0 178.55 171.71 24.62 25.00 0.00 0.00 03020203 Total 14,107 0 108.85 89.83 29.74 29.70 0.00 0.00 MOU 190 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 13,917 0 108.85 89.83 29.74 29.70 0.00 0.00 03020204 Total 9,972 680 79.96 129.85 1,400.92 1,060.05 5.28 1.08 MOU 0 0 0.09 0.00 2.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 9,972 680 79.87 129.85 1,398.26 1,060.05 5.28 1.08 New 24,053 3,198 9.41 6.06 1.00 2.68 0.00 0.00 05050001 Total 24,053 3,198 9.41 6.06 1.00 2.68 0.00 0.00 MOU 2,185 1,024 0.27 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 21,868 2,175 9.14 5.43 1.00 2.68 0.00 0.00 Pasquotank 15,578 0 394.18 21.72 1,133.86 30.76 3.13 35.67 03010205 Total 15,578 0 394.18 21.72 1,133.86 30.76 3.13 35.67 MOU 0 0 4.05 2.37 26.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 15,578 0 390.13 19.35 1,107.50 30.76 3.13 35.67 Roanoke 44,319 2,514 144.04 106.09 115.46 685.00 0.00 0.00 03010102 Total 1,961 2,421 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 1,961 2,421 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 03010103 Total 10,584 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 1,420 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 9,164 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 03010104 Total 14,941 93 88.08 3.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 14,941 93 88.08 3.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 03010106 Total 4,960 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 4,960 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 03010107 Total 11,873 0 55.96 102.54 115.46 685.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 11,873 0 55.96 102.54 115.46 685.00 0.00 0.00 Savannah 4,377 623 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.00 03060101 Total 4,377 623 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 4,377 623 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.00 2 of 3 Updated 9/ 30/ 07 Appendix C: Net Remaining Asset Credits Stream Restoration Stream Restoration Equivalent Riparian Restoration Riparian Restoration Equivalent Nonriparian Restoration Nonriparian Restoration Equivalent Coastal Marsh Restoration Coastal Marsh Restoration Equivalent River Basin Cataloging Unit Net Debited Asset Credits ( does not include outstanding permit requirements that have not yet been debited) 03060102 Total 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Tar- Pamlico 30,954 0 159.05 100.81 389.32 110.46 3.24 0.00 03020101 Total 12,836 0 7.09 3.63 16.80 0.37 0.00 0.00 MOU 3,199 0 0.00 0.00 1.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 9,637 0 7.09 3.63 15.44 0.37 0.00 0.00 03020102 Total 6,454 0 80.91 3.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 6,454 0 80.91 3.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 03020103 Total 10,214 0 21.43 81.36 119.33 2.73 0.00 0.00 MOU 1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 10,213 0 21.43 81.36 119.33 2.73 0.00 0.00 03020104 Total 1,450 0 33.90 12.32 237.20 107.36 3.24 0.00 MOU 512 0 2.94 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 938 0 30.96 12.32 236.88 107.36 3.24 0.00 03020105 Total 0 0 15.72 0.00 15.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 0 0 15.72 0.00 15.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 Watauga 2,722 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 06010103 Total 2,722 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 2,722 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 White Oak 21,001 401.98 22.72 2.68 86.90 48.10 3.21 0.00 03030001 Total 11,926 0 2.36 1.00 26.03 0.00 2.73 0.00 MOU 3,009 0 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.73 0.00 MOA 8,917 0 2.01 1.00 26.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 03020106 Total 9,074 402 20.36 1.68 60.87 48.10 0.48 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.00 MOA 9,074 402 19.70 1.68 60.87 48.10 0.18 0.00 Yadkin 137,120 7,892.20 224.87 31.22 14.51 10.73 0.00 0.00 03040101 Total 21,601 475 60.40 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU
Object Description
Description
Title | Ecosystem Enhancement Program quarterly report. |
Other Title | Quarterly report of the Ecosystem Enhancement Program |
Date | 2008 |
Release Date | 2008-02-11 |
Description | July 1, 2007/Sept. 30, 2007 |
Digital Characteristics-A | 1 MB; 87 p. |
Digital Format |
application/pdf |
Pres File Name-M | pubs_serial_ecosystemenhancementprogram200707.pdf |
Pres Local File Path-M | \Preservation_content\StatePubs\pubs_borndigital\images_master\ |
Full Text | February 11, 2008 Col. John E. Pulliam, Jr., Commander U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District Post Office Box 1890 Wilmington, NC 29402- 1890 Attn: Scott C. McLendon Re: Memorandum of Agreement ( MOA) Quarterly Report Dear Col. Pulliam: The Ecosystem Enhancement Program ( EEP) is pleased to submit the First Quarterly Report of State Fiscal Year 2007- 2008 to the United States Army Corps of Engineers ( USACE), Wilmington District. This Quarterly Report addresses the period beginning July 1 and ending September 30, 2007. The materials presented within provide information as required under Section VII, Part B of the Memorandum of Agreement among the USACE, the N. C. Department of Transportation ( NCDOT) and the N. C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources ( NCDENR), signed into effect on July 22, 2003. The following actions occurred this quarter: • NCDENR Assistant Secretary for Natural Resources Richard Rogers accepted a position as executive director of the Clean Water Management Trust Fund. Since that time, Mr. Manly Wilder has been appointed to assume this position. Mr. Wilder retired from the Natural Resources Conservation Service with 35 years of service and joined NCDENR in 2005 as director of the Division of Soil and Water Conservation before assuming his new duties in the Secretary’s office. • In August 2007, in partnership with USACE and the NCDOT, a workshop was held to address surplus assets and develop means to best utilize those resources. Under the leadership of the Tri- party executives, EEP and NCDOT are coordinating the action plans according to the recommendations and approvals of the task force. EEP has temporarily suspended some mitigation project pursuits as we continue to receive case- by- case mitigation alternatives under a proposal by NCDOT, and review by USACE. Col. John E. Pulliam, Jr., Commander February 11, 2008 Page two • Overall conformance remains in good standing. Details are provided in this quarterly report. EEP remains committed to the success of this innovative partnership. We appreciate the continued leadership provided by your office. Please contact me should you have any questions regarding this report. Respectfully, William D. Gilmore, PE Director, Ecosystem Enhancement Program cc: Manly Wilder, Assistant Secretary for Natural Resources, NCDENR Bill Rosser, Highway Administrator, NCDOT North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM QUARTERLY REPORT July 1 through September 30, 2007 U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District This quarterly report is intended to satisfy reporting requirements of the Memorandum of Agreement as amended and entered into by the N. C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources ( NCDENR), the N. C. Department of Transportation ( NCDOT), and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers ( USACE), Wilmington District, on July 22, 2003, for providing compensatory mitigation through the NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program to offset impacts to waters and wetlands due to activities authorized by Clean Water Act permits. Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1 through September 30, 2007 Table of Contents Page i. Introduction 3 ii. Report Structure 3 Section I. EEP Restoration, Enhancement, Creation, and Preservation Projects 4 EEP Gross Assets 4 EEP Gross Asset Summary 5 EEP Net Remaining Assets 5 EEP Gross High Quality Preservation Assets 5 High Quality Preservation Sites Acquired This Quarter 6 EEP Net High Quality Preservation Assets 7 Section II. Tri- Party Memorandum of Agreement 7 EEP MOA Gross and Net Assets 7 MOA Current Mitigation Requirements, Debits, and Commitments 7 MOA Future Requirements 9 MOA Future Expectations 10 MOA Conformance 10 Section III. In- Lieu Fee ( ILF) Memorandum of Understanding ( MOU) 11 EEP ILF MOU Assets – Gross and Net Assets 11 ILF MOU Present and Future Quarter Mitigation Requirements 11 MOU Net Asset Balances 11 MOU Conformance 12 MOU Future Expectations 13 Section IV. Planning 13 Local Watershed Planning for Projected Impacts 13 Section V. Monitoring 14 USGS Eight- Digit Cataloging Units Map 16 Section VI. EEP Conformance Action Strategies by Cataloging Unit 17 Section VII. Future Conformance 29 Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 1 Appendix Listing Appendix A EEP Gross Asset List of Tier 1 Restoration, Enhancement, Creation, and Preservation Sites Appendix B Summary of EEP Gross Assets Appendix C Net Remaining Asset Credits Appendix D EEP Gross High Quality Preservation Project List and Summary D1 – EEP Gross High Quality Preservation Project List D2 – EEP Gross High Quality Preservation Summary Appendix E Summaries of EEP High Quality Preservation Assets Utilized and Remaining E1 - Net Remaining HQP Assets Summary E2 – Summary of EEP High Quality Preservation Assets Utilized Appendix F MOA Mitigation Requirements, Debits, and Commitments F1- MOA Permit Requirements and Debits F2- List of EEP MOA Year 4 Mitigation Requirements F3- Summary of EEP MOA Year 4 Mitigation Requirements F4- List of EEP MOA Mitigation Commitments F5- Summary of Outstanding EEP MOA Mitigation Commitments ( Potential Future Requirements Not Yet Permitted) Appendix G MOA Future Requirements - Remaining NCDOT Projected Impacts Appendix H MOA Net Asset Balances ( Surplus and Deficits) Appendix I MOA Outstanding Permit Requirements Appendix J MOU ILF Present and Future Quarter Mitigation Requirements Appendix K MOU Net Asset Balances ( Surplus and Deficits) Appendix L MOU Outstanding Permit Requirements Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 2 i. Introduction This report covers the period beginning July 1, 2007, through September 30, 2007. This report documents the quarterly status of both the Memorandum of Understanding ( MOU) between NCDENR and USACE established in 1998 and Memorandum of Agreement ( MOA) among NCDENR, USACE and NCDOT, signed July 22, 2003, and combines reporting into a single document. It is expected that the format of this report will evolve as improvements and adjustments are suggested and made by USACE and other interested parties. For more information about the agreements, visit our Web site at www. nceep. net. ii. Report Structure This report is broken into seven main sections: SECTION I. EEP Restoration, Enhancement, Creation and Preservation Projects- This section reports the EEP stream and wetland restoration, enhancement, creation, and preservation projects that have been developed under the MOA and MOU programs. This section lists EEP projects, provides a summary of Gross Assets, and a summary of Net Assets. SECTION II. MOA– This section details specifics regarding the MOA program. SECTION III. MOU– This section details specifics regarding the MOU program. SECTION IV. Planning– This section summarizes watershed- planning efforts during the quarter. SECTION V. Monitoring– This section summarizes project- monitoring efforts during the quarter. SECTION VI. Conformance Action Strategies by Cataloging Unit– This section discusses the specific action strategies EEP has in place to address any outstanding mitigation needs in the various river basins and cataloging units in North Carolina. SECTION VII. Future Conformance – This section explains how delays in permitting could temporarily impact conformance in several CUs. Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 3 SECTION I: EEP RESTORATION, ENHANCEMENT, CREATION AND PRESERVATION PROJECTS Section I is a report on the status of the restoration, enhancement, creation and preservation projects developed by the Ecosystem Enhancement Program. High Quality Preservation ( HQP) projects are also summarized independently of EEP’s other restoration, enhancement and preservation projects. EEP GROSS ASSETS Currently, EEP has assets exceeding 1,537,330 linear feet of stream and 21,747 acres of wetlands. In addition to these, EEP has instituted HQP assets exceeding 1,242,0256 linear feet ( over 235 miles) of streams and 8,549 acres of wetlands. EEP projects originate from three main areas: 1. Projects that were initiated by NCDOT; 2. Projects that were initiated by the NCDENR Wetlands Restoration Program; and 3. Projects that have been initiated by EEP. Appendix A: EEP Gross Asset List of Tier 1 Restoration, Enhancement, Creation and Preservation Sites contains a complete listing of the current EEP individual stream and wetland restoration, enhancement, creation and preservation projects as of Sept. 30, 2007, by river basin and eight- digit Cataloging Unit ( CU). ( HQP sites are not listed in this table.) During July 2007, a number of older projects experienced asset quantity adjustments; these adjustments are reflected in this quarterly report. Additionally, a few projects were dropped by EEP during this quarter due to technical considerations. These projects are discussed in more detail in Section VI. All of the projects listed in Appendix A have had their mitigation credits transferred to or originated from EEP. For former NCDOT projects that had completed construction prior to the formation of EEP, only the undebited remaining restoration, enhancement or preservation feet/ acres were transferred. Thus Appendix A only shows the transferred restoration, enhancement or preservation remaining for these projects ( i. e., the assets that had not been utilized by NCDOT). In some cases, former NCDOT projects had no remaining credits associated with a specific project. These projects are listed as having no gross assets in Appendix A. All of the other types of projects show the gross amount of restoration, enhancement or preservation associated with these projects. These numbers are subject to change as design or monitoring results are received. Projects initiated ( but not completed/ not debited) by NCDOT’s Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch prior to the inception of the EEP are in various stages of implementation. EEP staff is currently managing these projects. EEP will use these mitigation credits according to the guidelines Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 4 of the Tri- Party MOA. The projects that were initiated by NCDOT as full-delivery projects are currently under contract with NCDOT but are available for debiting for the purposes of EEP, as determined by credit release schedules. Projects that were initiated and developed by the staff of the NCDENR Wetlands Restoration Program have been acquired as defined by the 1998 MOU between USACE and NCDENR, or the 2003 EEP Tri- Party MOA. EEP GROSS ASSET SUMMARY Appendix B: Summary of EEP Gross Assets is a summary of the gross assets by river basin, CU and program ( MOA or MOU). Appendix B also provides grand totals for the entire state. These numbers are subject to change as design and/ or monitoring results are received or as new projects are added into the program. Also, as stated above, former NCDOT sites that were completed and partially debited prior to the formation of EEP contain only the remaining credits from each site. This means that only the remaining credits ( as determined by NCDOT and USACE) were summarized in this table for NCDOT transferred projects. EEP NET REMAINING ASSETS Appendix C: Net Remaining Asset Credits is a summary of the remaining assets associated with restoration, enhancement, creation and preservation projects that EEP currently has available to meet compensatory mitigation requirements. The remaining assets are summarized for the MOA and MOU programs, respectively. Note that the assets have been converted into restoration and restoration- equivalent credits in this table. The amounts of mitigation provided in the table are the total remaining amount of mitigation available to a particular project over time. Where credit- release schedules have been established, EEP will debit from these projects accordingly. Also note that amounts of mitigation for any project may change from the current snapshot as additional design and monitoring information becomes available, or as mitigation units are refined as per the goals set forth in the EEP Tri- Party 2007 MOA. EEP GROSS HIGH QUALITY PRESERVATION ASSETS All of the High Quality Preservation sites have been acquired by the State except for one State Parks parcel. That acquisition is expected to be completed during the next quarter. Appendix D1: EEP Gross High Quality Preservation Project ( HQP) List displays all HQP that EEP has acquired since July 2003 by ecoregion. All HQP quality preservation assets are MOA assets. Gross stream and wetland feet or acreages are subject to change as additional survey work is completed on these sites. EEP has protected over 235 miles of stream, along with 7,040 acres of Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 5 riparian wetland and 1,508 acres of non- riparian wetland through High Quality Preservation. These gross assets are lower than those reported in the final quarterly report for 2006- 2007, and lower than those reported in the 2006- 2007 Annual Report. Unfortunately, twelve HQP sites that were listed in quarter 4 of 2006- 2007 as tier 1 sites had to be dropped in Quarter 1 of 2007- 2008. These sites are listed in Table 1. None of these tier 1 sites had any compensatory mitigation debits charged to them. EEP stopped acquisition of these projects after NCDOT reduced their mitigation order. Applications are being made to the State Trust Funds and other funding sources to complete the acquisition of these sites. They have been deleted from the EEP mitigation ledger. Because these sites were dropped, the gross assets attributed to HQP sites are lower than those shown in the last annual report and quarterly reports. Table 1. High Quality Preservation Acquisitions Dropped Due to Reduced Mitigation Order Beginning Balances Site Name County Eco-region River Basin CU TOTAL Stream TOTAL Riverine TOTAL Non- Riverine Fishing Creek ( Gold Mine) Franklin CP Tar- Pamlico 03020102 6,707 20.20 0.00 Fishing Creek ( Maple Branch) Warren CP Tar- Pamlico 03020102 8,218 20.00 0.00 IP Upper Fishing Creek 2 Warren CP Tar- Pamlico 03020102 5,403 0.00 0.00 IP Upper Reedy Creek Warren CP Tar- Pamlico 03020102 5,301 0.00 0.00 Shocco Creek ( IP # 1) Warren CP Tar- Pamlico 03020102 4,355 10.00 0.00 Shocco Creek ( IP # 2) Warren CP Tar- Pamlico 03020102 4,583 10.00 0.00 IP Lower Fishing Creek 2 Edgecombe NICP Tar- Pamlico 03020102 4,419 0.00 0.00 Upper Roanoke ( Civil War) Northampton NICP Roanoke 03010107 1,720 0.00 0.00 Upper Roanoke ( Cypress Cr) Northampton NICP Roanoke 03010107 11,839 0.00 0.00 Upper Roanoke ( Odum/ Cal) Northampton NICP Roanoke 03010107 2,930 0.00 0.00 Juniper Creek IP Columbus SICP Lumber 03040206 22,510 0.0 0.00 Juniper Creek IP Brunswick SOCP Lumber 03040206 431 21.00 0.00 All sites were part of the International Paper transaction. The properties had already been purchased by The Nature Conservancy on behalf of the State. No new HQP closings were completed during the quarter. Appendix D2, EEP Gross HQP Summary lists balances by ecoregion. Total beginning balances for stream feet is 1,242,025.5, riparian wetland acres is 7,040.47 and non- riparian acres is 1,508.34. Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 6 EEP NET HIGH QUALITY PRESERVATION ASSETS Appendix E, EEP Net High Quality Preservation ( HQP) Assets lists the net remaining HQP assets available for future debits by ecoregion. Currently, all HQP assets are located in the MOA Program. Gross stream and wetland feet or acreages are subject to change as additional survey work is completed on sites. More than $ 74 million has been spent to date to protect these conservation lands. Projections indicate based on NCDOT current mitigation order, that the majority of these HQP mitigation units will be fully utilized within the current NCDOT Transportation Improvement Plan ( TIP) Across the state, EEP has net HQP assets of 797,774 feet ( 151 miles) of stream, 6,482 acres of riverine wetlands and 1,233 acres of non- riverine wetland. These assets include properties secured with recorded option agreements, permanent conservation easements, and fee simple purchases. To further the goal of no net loss of aquatic resources, utilization of these preservation sites will be accomplished by restoration- type mitigation projects within the same watershed where impacts occur. SECTION II: TRI- PARTY MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT ( MOA) This section of the report provides specifics with regard to the EEP Tri- Party MOA. Specifically, this section describes the current EEP mitigation acceptances under the MOA, the debits that have been made thus far, the schedule for future debits, and the remaining projected impacts that NCDOT has supplied that may indicate when future requirements may occur. EEP MOA GROSS AND NET ASSETS Both gross and net assets are listed in appendices B and C as described in Section I. MOA CURRENT MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS, DEBITS, AND COMMITMENTS This section describes EEP’s current regulatory requirements, debits and commitments for the MOA program. The structure of this section has been modified from previous quarterly reports in an attempt to provide additional clarity. EEP, regulatory agencies and NCDOT follow rigorous procedures in order for EEP to assume mitigation responsibility for NCDOT- permitted impacts. In accordance with the Tri- Party MOA, NCDOT forecasts impacts associated with each of its transportation projects. EEP uses this projected impact Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 7 information to develop restoration, enhancement, creation and preservation projects sufficient to meet mitigation needs and timelines. Approximately six- to-nine months in advance of an individual NCDOT transportation- project letting, NCDOT formally submits a request to EEP to provide the mitigation. EEP reviews each request and submits acceptance letters to NCDOT and the regulatory agencies for each project where EEP assumes mitigation responsibility. These acceptance letters are used during NCDOT’s permitting process. Typically, there is a three- to- six month time period between EEP’s acceptance letters and the permit issuance. The permit specifies the responsible party ( EEP for off- site mitigation), location, amount and type of the mitigation. Prior to permit issuances, all EEP- issued acceptance letters are considered “ commitments.” After permit issuances, EEP’s commitments are transformed into mitigation “ requirements.” The permit issuance date determines the timeframes when EEP must provide the mitigation ( this time frame is often called the debit- due date). On March 8, 2007, Section X of the Tri- Party MOA was amended which changed the future mitigation debit- due dates and mitigation milestones. For MOA permits issued in MOA Year 5 ( July 1, 2007 through June 30, 2008), the debit-due date is June 30, 2008. ( For MOU permits issued in MOA Year 5, the debit due date is June 30, 2009.) Appendix F is a series of five tables listing data for MOA Mitigation Requirements, Debits, and Commitments. F1- MOA Permit Requirements and Debits lists all mitigation requirements that were due as of September 30, 2007, and lists mitigation debits that have been made to offset those requirements. F2- List of EEP MOA Year 5 Mitigation Requirements lists projects for which permits have been accepted, issued and received by EEP in MOA Year 5. Mitigation for these projects will be due on June 30, 2008. F3- Summary of EEP MOA Year 5 Mitigation Requirements summarizes mitigation requirements for projects listed in Appendix F2. F4- List of EEP MOA Mitigation Commitments lists projects in which EEP has issued mitigation acceptance letters, but permits have not yet been issued/ received. The mitigation due date is determined by permit issuance date and Section X of the 2007 TriParty MOA. Since these projects have not yet been permitted, mitigation has not yet been required. However, EEP has applied some credits in advance. The table lists the HQP sites that have been debited and applied in advance of the official mitigation due date. ( Note: Impacts and mitigation requirements listed in table F4 are projections only. The actual finalized impacts and mitigation requirements will not be known until permits are issued. However, the table does list the amount of mitigation Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 8 that EEP has thus far committed to provide for these projects as detailed in EEP’s mitigation- acceptance letters.) F5- Summary of Outstanding EEP MOA Mitigation Commitments summarizes the list of commitments detailed in Appendix F4. MOA FUTURE REQUIREMENTS Appendix G: MOA Future Requirements - Remaining NCDOT Projected Impacts is a summary of the NCDOT mitigation order shown as impacts associated with NCDOT’s seven- year Transportation Improvement Plan ( TIP). Appendix G is summarized by MOA impact year, river basin and CU. The data in Appendix G originates from the original seven- year impact forecast submitted by NCDOT to EEP in February 2007. Some of the individual project impact projections have been updated by more recently collected field data. These revised impacts were submitted by NCDOT on a project- by- project basis over the last quarter. Appendix G has also been updated to show only the remaining forecasted impacts covering the seven- year projection time period. In other words, since February 2007 some of the original forecasted impacts are no longer forecasts, as NCDOT has formally requested that EEP accept mitigation responsibility for specific impacts associated with the transportation projects. Appendix G shows only those projects where NCDOT has yet to request mitigation or where EEP has not yet formally accepted mitigation responsibility. NCDOT divisions were unable to provide impacts by individual MOA Year and developed a lump- sum estimate for seven years. This lump- sum amount was spread evenly through each of the seven TIP years. All projects that were projected to occur in MOA Years 1, 2, or 3 and that were not accepted or permitted during these periods are now considered as MOA Year 5 impact projections. The TIP list is a dynamic list where individual project let dates frequently move in time. Major accelerations or volatility of project lettings or impact projections could result in major changes to EEP’s potential mitigation requirements and EEP’s procurement strategies. MOA FUTURE EXPECTATIONS During Year 4, the issue of surplus assets became significant among the Tri- Party agencies. At the time of this report, “ surplus assets” were defined as “ unused” credits that are projected to be remaining after accounting for the number of credits that will be used to meet the current TIP ( 5 to 6 years of TIP projects) and one year of ILF requirements. Surplus assets currently exist in a number of CUs. Surplus assets were mostly developed during the pre- EEP era when NCDOT initiated its first attempt at developing advanced mitigation. Unfortunately, these advances were often made without the benefit of precise forecasts of mitigation Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 9 need. These sites were originally developed with the intent to negotiate usage on a case- by- case basis. Today, many of these sites contain credits that exceed the forecasted need of the current TIP. Surplus mitigation has also been created when mitigation orders based on forecasted mitigation needs have exceeded actual permitted mitigation requirements. Incidental procurement ( when wetlands and stream credits exist on the same project, though only one type may be needed) and asset- yield variation on existing projects may also lead to small amounts of forecasted surplus. NCDOT also has been experiencing financial strain and has expressed an interest in utilizing these advanced mitigation credits to offset current and future mitigation need. To address these issues, NCDOT, USACE and DENR met in July 2007 to develop a plan to: 1. Create a strategy for reducing existing surplus assets used for offsetting NCDOT project impacts. This became the top priority for the August surplus-assets workshop. 2. Prevent the creation of new surplus assets that are intended to offset NCDOT project impacts. During this surplus- strategy development period and after discussions with USACE, DENR, and NCDOT, EEP has ceased procurement of new mitigation sites in CUs in river basins that contain surplus credits. Consequently, MOA conformance in these river basins may decline through the next MOA year due to the requested hold on procuring new mitigation sites in these areas. This decrease in conformance will be moderated due to the substantial advanced mitigation that has already been achieved for MOA Year 5. During this quarter, only stream conformance due to two projects being dropped for technical reasons. These projects are discussed in detail in Section VI. Appendix H: MOA Net Asset Balances ( Surplus and Deficits) demonstrates the current health of the program by showing the current net surpluses and deficits associated with the MOA program as of Sept. 30, 2007. As shown in Appendix C, EEP has obtained a program- wide 693,947 advanced stream credits, 3,134.92 advanced riparian- wetland credits, 6,967.58 advanced nonriparian- wetland credits and 103.47 advanced coastal- marsh wetland credits. Of these amounts, the MOA program had advanced 655,057 stream credits, 3,005.01 riparian credits, 6,868.25 nonriparian credits, and 100.45 coastal marsh credits. These advanced summaries do not include the advanced and unused HQP assets which are shown in Appendix E1. These credits are advanced credits that will be applied to future permits as mitigation is needed. MOA CONFORMANCE During the first quarter, overall MOA conformance decreased slightly since the last quarter. While riparian, nonriparian, and coastal marsh conformance Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 10 remained unchanged at 98.14 percent, 100 percent, and 100 percent respectively, stream conformance lowered from 98.14 percent to 93.82 percent as 3 previously met requirements became partially non- conformant as a result of EEP dropping the Black Gum Creek Full Delivery project and the Middle Swamp Creek project due to technical concerns. The current outstanding stream, riparian wetland and nonriparian wetland mitigation for Quarter 3 is 13,850.6 stream credits, 2.394 riparian credits, and zero nonriparian credits and zero coastal- marsh credits, respectively. The number of permits needing additional mitigation increase seven to 10 permits. A complete listing of the MOA permit requirements not in full conformance is listed in Appendix I: MOA Outstanding Permit Requirements. All 10 permits needing additional mitigation have been partially fulfilled. EEP’s Conformance Action Strategies for outstanding mitigation requirements are detailed in Section VI. SECTION III: IN- LIEU FEE ( ILF) MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ( MOU) EEP ILF MOU ASSETS – GROSS AND NET ASSETS Both gross and net assets are listed in appendices B and C as described in Section I. ILF MOU PRESENT AND FUTURE QUARTER MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS The MOU program had 68 new requirements that became due this quarter ( up 23 since last quarter), representing 16,683 credits of stream, 26.49 credits of riparian wetland, 14.63 credits of nonriparian wetland and 0.16 credits of coastal- marsh requirements. A complete summary of the requirements that became due is listed in Appendix J: MOU ILF Present and Future Quarter Mitigation Requirements. Appendix J also lists requirements that will become due over the next quarter. The requirements associated with the MOU Program are generally lower than historical levels ( though the current quarter can be consider a large amount under the new scale). This decrease is a result of NCDOT departing the ILF MOU program. Almost all new NCDOT mitigation requirements are now being handled under the Tri- Party MOA. However, the number of non- NCDOT applicants and the amount of mitigation associated with these applicants is increasing each year. MOU NET ASSET BALANCES Unlike the Tri- Party MOA program, the goal of which is to develop assets up to seven years in advance of permitted impacts, the MOU program is designed to produce instituted mitigation assets one year from the permit year in which a permit is issued. Another major objective of the MOU program is to have an ILF project appropriate to pay the actual cost of restoration. Together, these two goals result Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 11 in a delicate balance of building assets in just the right sizes and just the right amounts in each of the CUs to offset permitted requirements, while maintaining sufficient funds to pay for the required mitigation projects. In order to capitalize on efficiencies of scale, restoration project sizes tend to be large. On the other hand, ILF mitigation requirements tend to be very small. Thus there is always the potential to create surplus assets in some CUs and deficits in other CUs. The MOU program is at optimal performance when there are zero surplus assets and zero requirement deficits, and zero remaining funds. The current net ILF program- asset balances ( surplus and deficits) are shown in Appendix K: MOU Net Asset Balances. The ILF program has produced a net statewide asset balance of 32,148 stream credits, 117.91 riparian- wetland credits, 95.64 nonriparian- wetland credits and 2.83 coastal- marsh wetland credits. These asset balances show a decrease from the previous quarter in net balances for stream credits, riparian wetlands, nonriparian wetlands and coastal marsh. During the last quarter, the net asset balance was 41,837 credits of stream, 143.58 credits of riparian wetlands, 99.89 nonriparian- wetland credits and 3.34 coastal-marsh wetland credits. ( Note: The total amounts of MOU available unused credits are shown in Appendix C. The available unused credits are larger because outstanding requirements ( deficits) are not considered in Appendix C.) MOU CONFORMANCE The amount of nonconformance ( as measured in number of permit requirements met) decreased slightly during the current quarter with the addition of 68 new requirements. During the last quarter, 97.61 percent of requirements were fully met. This quarter, 96.76percent of all requirements were fully met. As of Sept. 30, 2007, the MOU program had 803 total requirements. Of these, 777 are conformant, six are in partial conformance and 20 are in non-conformance. Therefore the EEP has 96.76 percent of all MOU requirements in full conformance, 0.7% in partial conformance and 2.5 percent in non-conformance. During the previous quarter, 18 requirements had not been fully met. Of the 26 non- conformant requirements, 20 were related to wetland requirements, and six were related to stream requirements. The magnitude of outstanding stream requirements decreased this quarter. At the end of the last quarter, EEP had not met 6,886 credits of stream mitigation. As of Sept. 30, 2007, the remaining outstanding stream mitigation needs were 6,742 stream credits. The magnitude of outstanding riparian increased from 9.3 credits to 12 credits. The magnitude of outstanding nonriparian increased from 1.11 to 3.70 nonriparian Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 12 wetland credits. The magnitude of outstanding coastal marsh credits decreased from 1.11 to 0.20 coastal- marsh wetland credits. A complete listing of the permit requirements not in full conformance is listed in Appendix L: MOU Outstanding Permit Requirements. A narrative addressing EEP action plans for non- conformant CUs is included in this report in Section VI. MOU FUTURE EXPECTATIONS The status of the MOU program is expected to be relatively steady over the course of the next fiscal year, though some decreases in conformance may be expected since all EEP projects in development were placed on hold between June and November 2007 while the surplus- asset issue previously described was being discussed among the Tri- Party agencies. Additional buying and selling of excess assets between the MOA and MOU programs is expected to continue. These transactions will result in improved conformance capabilities for both programs. SECTION IV: PLANNING In Quarter 2, EEP began the following watershed planning initiatives: • Collaboration with Wake County government agencies to develop a countywide watershed plan. The proposed strategy under development will combine the county’s desire to purchase easements and preserve green space with EEP’s mission to produce projects that improve watershed function. • Participation in the Chatham County Partnership to help promote implementation of the Rocky River Local Watershed Planning ( LWP) and identify wetland restoration opportunities. • Initiation of contracts to develop a new LWP in the Goose and Crooked Creek watersheds near Monroe in the Yadkin 05 CU. ( This project was placed on hold pending DOT budget approval.) • Scoped a contract to perform landowner outreach for priority restoration projects in the Muddy Creek watershed in McDowell County, in the Catawba 01 catalog unit. • Phase IV activities in the Peachtree- Martins Creek LWP area, focusing on landowner outreach for priority restoration opportunities. • Discussions with local resource professionals in Surry County in advance of a proposed new watershed planning initiative to support mitigation efforts in Yadkin 01. ( This project was placed on hold pending DOT budget approval.) EEP continued the following initiatives: • CU- screening activities in Little Tennessee 01, 02, and 03, Chowan 03 and 04, Yadkin 05 and 202; and Cape Fear 04, 05, 06 and 07, to develop River Basin Restoration Priorities. Activities included analyzing Watershed Attribute Matrices, conducting field site visits, meeting with local resource professionals and hosting workshops to solicit input on priority watersheds for restoration. • Phase IV activities in the Lower Creek LWP area ( Catawba 01), consisting of EEP planners participating on Lower Creek Advisory Team ( LCAT), meeting Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 13 with the Education subcommittee to assist local watershed education efforts, and working with Implementation staff to “ ground- truth” LWP- identified project sites. • Joint Phase IV plan development for the Little Lick Creek, Lick Creek, Ellerbe Creek, Swift Creek and Lake Rogers watersheds in the Upper Neuse. • Crisp Creek Drainage District Phase IV plan demonstration project in Tar- Pamlico 03. • Phase II Fishing Creek LWP, including a fifth stakeholder meeting in Oxford in October. • Phases I & II LWP in White Oak 01 and White Oak 06 CUs. • Phase II fieldwork for the Tickle, Travis, and Little Alamance Local Watershed Plan, including field assessment of streams, and continued work on water quality assessment. • Received second set of new data from the N. C. Center for Geographic Information and Analysis for CU screening. • Contributed to the N. C. Submerged Aquatic Vegetation( SAV) mapping initiative and began developing a white paper that discusses the potential for SAV restoration in the state. • Continued work with Tetra Tech in the Catawba 03 CU to assess and identify non- traditional mitigation opportunities to accommodate unmet wetland needs. • Continued collaborative work with the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service and other state and federal agencies on aquatic organism passage in the Little Tennessee River basin. EEP completed the following initiatives: • CU- screening activities in Catawba 01, 02, and 03 to develop River Basin Restoration Priorities. • Stoney Creek Local Watershed Plan Phase IV was presented to the Wayne County Board of Commissioners and to the Goldsboro City Council. • Phases I- III of the Peachtree- Martins Creek LWP effort were completed with the development of the Watershed Management Plan and presentation of the plan during a public meeting. SECTION V: MONITORING For the first quarter, monitoring staff were involved in maintenance site assessment, full- delivery site assessment, closeout of Wildlife Resources Commission( WRC) stream projects and asset verification. Monitoring staff participated in an assessment of specified maintenance projects. In addition to assessment, staff members utilized this time as a maintenance training opportunity internal to the Project Control and Research Group of EEP. Moreover, staff members also participated in an assessment of select full- delivery sites. Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 14 Throughout the quarter, staff members have participated in closeout activities related to EEP projects. Several WRC stream projects were proposed and visited during this period to verify the status and fitness for closeout for the PACG- TC. During this quarter every year henceforth, monitoring staff will conduct an asset verification on all projects in Year 3 of monitoring. The purpose of this effort is to provide a check of the assets for the Strategic Planning Section. Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 15 Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 16 SECTION VI: EEP COMPLIANCE ACTION STRATEGIES BY CATALOGING UNIT ACTION STRATEGIES FOR NON- COMPLIANT CUs CAPE FEAR 03030002 Outstanding Mitigation Required Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent Streams 0 0 Riparian 0 0 Non- Riparian 0.15 0.15 Coastal Marsh 0 0 Background: Cape Fear 03030002 is a high demand CU for stream- and- riparian mitigation needs. Nonriparian- mitigation impacts are inconsistent, most likely due to the relative scarcity of nonriparian wetlands in the watershed. CU Immediate Action Plan: The Watershed Planning and Program Implementation Group has been assigned responsibility for procuring 2.5 Restoration ( R) and 2.0 Restoration Equivalent ( RE) type nonriparian- mitigation credits before the end of Year 5. CU Long- Range Action Plan: EEP plans to issue Full Delivery Proposals for Nonriparian Wetland mitigation credits for the long term needs within the CU. The magnitude of the request will be based primarily on projected NCDOT long term nonriparian- wetland mitigation needs. CATAWBA 03050103 Outstanding Mitigation Required Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent Streams 0 0 Riparian 5.33 3.80 Non- Riparian 1.80 0 Coastal Marsh 0 0 Background: Catawba 03050103 has been identified as a critical CU watershed in the state by EEP, as it is a very difficult CU for producing compensatory mitigation for streams and wetlands. Catawba 03050103 is comprised mostly of the greater Charlotte metropolitan area. Most streams in Catawba 03050103 are degraded and have experienced the growing pains of urbanization and, more recently, suburban sprawl. Urbanization presents challenges in producing stream- Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 17 mitigation projects due to arduous constraints often in place along these streams. Typical constraints include sewer lines along and in the streams; residential, industrial and commercial development in the floodplain; FEMA- regulated streams; hazardous waste; stormwater outlets; unknown pipe outlets; local ordinances; leaking sewer lines; chemical spills; local landfills within the stream; the relative large size of streams per acre watershed; large numbers of landowners per potential project site; etc. Each of these constraints limits the type and size of the potential stream- restoration project, and also significantly increases the cost of these projects. Nevertheless, EEP has worked closely with Mecklenburg County, the City of Charlotte, and the regulatory agencies to produce adequate stream-mitigation projects to compensate for impacts. However, since impacts are continuing at a rapid rate, it is unlikely that EEP can continue to produce traditional stream- mitigation projects within the CU at the same rate that mitigation requirements are being produced. Wetlands restoration is extremely limited within this CU. Nearly all of remaining wetlands within the CU are located along large river floodplains, or are relatively small mafic- type depressional wetlands. These wetlands are continually being impacted, as development and urbanization is occurring at very high levels within this CU. Restoration opportunities for these types of wetlands do not exist in any significant quantity within this CU. Most of the historical wetlands loss is currently occupied either by development or located along riparian systems. Wetlands restoration along riparian systems is also typically not possible because the streams are regulated under stringent FEMA no- rise regulations. In order to perform most riparian- wetlands restoration, the stream level often needs to be elevated so that the stream can access its historic floodplain. FEMA and local regulations make this exceedingly difficult in most of this CU. Also, raising flood elevations is problematic because of the amount of floodplain development located in this CU. Finally, locating suitable wetlands- restoration opportunities has been made more difficult because of soil mapping in Mecklenburg County. The current Mecklenburg Division of Soil and Water soil map has not indicated any hydric A soils. While hydric A soils certainly exist in Mecklenburg, the maps do not detail their locations. Typically, floodplains are mapped as Monacan soils, which often have hydric inclusions. Another problem associated with wetlands restoration within this CU is the amount of time it will take for a specific wetlands- restoration project to be constructed. Due to FEMA and local regulations, most wetlands projects will need to undergo a long flood- level modeling and evaluation period. The result is one- to- three additional years to complete construction beyond projects that do not require this level of modeling. This historical presence of endangered mussel species also has made implementation of projects difficult in this watershed. EEP is having difficulty in getting permits to implement some projects in the watershed due to USFW agency concerns that the restoration of upstream tributaries will cause temporary Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 18 sedimentation during construction that could negatively affect downstream populations of endangered species. The USFWS supports riparian vegetation restoration only in these types of areas. Unfortunately, the in- stream conditions of many of these degraded streams are too unstable to allow for riparian vegetation only restoration to be successful. The overall degree of difficulty in identifying stream- and wetlands- restoration opportunities is reflected in the results of the last six RFPs issued by EEP and the Wetlands Restoration Program. After the first five RFP requests, EEP/ WRP had received zero wetland project submittals and only two small stream projects. The stream projects were located along the outer edge of the developing regions. Four of the last five requests have received no response. The last RFP has had some submittals. These submittals were expected to be opened during the last quarter but were delayed. They were opened during the current quarter. After review, the submittals were rejected due to extremely high costs. Historically, there have been 45 requirements paid and now due in the MOU program in Catawba 03050103. Of these, 34 have been stream requirements, nine riparian requirements and two nonriparian requirements. The MOA program currently has had no mitigation requirements in Catawba 03. CU Immediate Action Plan: The lower Catawba CU is a chronic problem and critical watershed for implementing stream- and wetland- mitigation projects due to the urban nature of the CU, local and federal laws, and flooding concerns. Also, there is very little opportunity for high- quality wetland projects. Recognizing the limitations and chronic issues associated within the Catawba 03050103 watershed, this past quarter the Program Assessment and Consistency Group ( PACG) passed mitigation guidance that allows the use of mitigation assets in Catawba 03050102 and the lower portion of Catawba 03050103 ( falling within or partially within the Southern Outer Piedmont Ecoregion) to be used to offset mitigation needs in Catawba 03050103 for either the MOU and MOA in lieu fee programs. The new policy will require a 50 percent penalty ratio when being used to address permit requirements in effect prior to the issuance of the policy. No penalty will be applied when addressing permit requirements that became effective after the issuance of the policy. To achieve the remaining outstanding mitigation requirements, the EEP is relying on a number of traditional and alternative strategies: 1. EEP Watershed Planning and Project Implementation initiated a survey of Catawba 03030102 for additional wetland- restoration opportunities. 2. Re- issuance of a request for full- delivery projects after EEP has completed its internal survey and received revised NCDOT impact Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 19 projections for the revised TIP. ( The RFP re- issuance is currently on hold pending resolution of surplus issue raised by NCDOT Board of Transportation and EEP Watershed Planning and Project Implementation efforts in locating suitable mitigation in expanded service area.) 3. Potential implementation of nontraditional projects based on the Charlotte LWP Initiative. Numerous sites identified through this planning effort have yielded nontraditional wetland- and stream-mitigation opportunities. EEP has presented these projects to the PACG and is awaiting approval of the methodology to calculate mitigation credits before proceeding with these projects. One year ago ( four quarters ago), the Non- Traditional Mitigation Steering Committee modified the EEP’s functional/ credit methodology based on the PACG and the PACG- TC’s previous comments. EEP is awaiting approval of the methodology. If the methodology is not approved soon, the identified projects will no longer be available for implementation. 4. Evaluation of the CU for wetlands- preservation opportunities that may be able to provide some mitigation credit towards the wetland deficits. EEP Planning has identified multiple preservation sites and is directing local watershed planning to identify, assess and acquire these sites. One project has been identified during the current quarter that will yield 2.5 mitigation credits. 5. Use existing assets or generate new assets in the lower portion of Catawba 03050101 for the MOU Program. EEP has approval from USACE ( reference letter May 21, 2004 from Ken Jolly to Bill Gilmore) to use wetlands assets in the lower portion of Catawba 03050101 to offset these deficits. 6. Use existing assets or generate new assets in Catawba 03050102 and the lower portion of Catawba 03050101 per the passed PACG guidance issued this past quarter. Existing wetlands in Catawba 03050102 have been utilized save for wetlands that have been earmarked to offset additional mitigation needs that may be necessary to meet NCDOT permit shortfalls associated with the NCDOT Little Sugar mitigation project. EEP is awaiting transfer of mitigation permit responsibility to EEP prior to utilizing these remaining credits to mitigate for these pre- EEP mitigation shortfalls. 7. Evaluation of wetlands restoration on Chewacla soils. EEP has discussed with USACE the possibility of pursuing wetlands restoration sites with Chewacla soil types in association with priority one stream restoration opportunities. Additional potential wetland opportunities Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 20 have been identified on the Pott Creek II mitigation site. The feasibility of this potential is currently being evaluated. 8. Utilize HQP assets generated in the MOA program to offset riparian wetland restoration equivalent needs for the MOU program. PACG and NCDOT authorization is needed to allow for these credits to be sold and used by the MOU program. CHOWAN 03010204 Outstanding Mitigation Required Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent Streams 0 0 Riparian 0 0 Non- Riparian 0.022 0.022 Coastal Marsh 0 0 Background: The Chowan river basin has historically had little activity for the EEP’s mitigation programs. Only one payment has ever been made in the river basin in history of the programs. The payment became due this quarter totaling 0.044 nonriparian mitigation credits. CU Immediate Action Plan: The EEP Watershed Planning and Project Implementation group has been assigned to identify a nonriparian mitigation project suitable to meet the current and long- term mitigation needs in this watershed. Unfortunately, due to excessive surplus located in the Pasquotank River Basin, the WPPI initiative has been placed on hold pending the discussions between the regulatory agencies, NCDENR, and NCDOT regarding the potential use of these credits to meet permit needs in the Chowan River Basin. More than 1,110 nonriparian surplus credits exist in the Pasquotank River Basin that could be used to offset mitigation needs. CU Long- Range Action Plan: Long range needs in this watershed are projected to be 9.14 nonriparian mitigation credits. EEP Watershed Planning and Project Implementation group has been assigned to identify and implement projects sufficient to meet long- term needs. As stated above, this initiative is currently on hold pending the outcome of the interagency surplus- asset discussions. Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 21 HIWASSEE 06020002 Outstanding Mitigation Required Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent Streams 4,372 0 Riparian 0.82 0 Non- Riparian 0 0 Coastal Marsh 0 0 Background: The Hiwassee River Basin has historically been an area of limited activity for EEP. As a result it has taken the program more time to develop restoration projects in this area. At the end of the transition period on July 22, 2005, EEP did not have the restoration available to supplement the HQP used to cover one permit during the transition. Until the restoration has been instituted, EEP is continuing to cover the affected permit with 10: 1 HQP. ( Note There was a database error recording the total number of credits associated with and debited from the Trout Cove Branch project located in Hiwassee 06020002 during the current quarter- the total amount of credits is currently 3,900 rather than 1,876 as reported within this report. This error will be corrected in the next quarterly report.) CU Immediate Action Plan: Currently, EEP has identified three projects representing 15,240 stream credits and 6.13 riparian wetland credits and 3.76 nonriparian credits. EEP is continuing to negotiate with the landowners on two of these projects representing 10,740 stream credits, 1.13 riparian credits, and 2.26 nonriparian credits. If these projects are acquired and instituted, EEP will have sufficient stream and wetland credits in this CU. If this negotiation fails, EEP is prepared to issue a full- delivery request to meet the outstanding mitigation need. CU Long- Range Action Plan: EEP is developing a LWP in this CU in partnership with the Hiwassee River Watershed Coalition to continue to develop quality restoration opportunities to meet current and future needs in this CU. LITTLE TENNESSEE 06010203 Outstanding Mitigation Required Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent Streams 144 144 Riparian 0 0 Non- Riparian 0 0 Coastal Marsh 0 0 Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 22 Background: This CU has historically had little activity. EEP currently only has one permit requirement in this CU. This permit requirement had previously been met by the Frizell Full Delivery Project. However an Indian burial ground was discovered during the current quarter on Frizell that prevents the implementation of the project. Consequently, the Frizell stream- restoration project has been terminated. CU Action Plan: The EEP Watershed Planning and Project Implementation group has been assigned the task of identifying a stream and riparian wetland project designed to meet the current and future stream- and wetland- mitigation needs in this CU. LUMBER 03040203 Outstanding Mitigation Required Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent Streams 9,318 0 Riparian 0 0 Non- Riparian 0 0 Coastal Marsh 0 0 Background: Two projects in this watershed were dropped during the current quarter resulting in the outstanding stream- mitigation needs: Middle Swamp Creek and Black Gum Creek. The Middle Swamp Creek was a very large stream restoration located in the coastal plain. The design and permitting process for this project had been difficult but permits had been acquired for implementation of the project. However, based on the Feb. 7 – 8, 2007 Coastal Issues Forum, the resulting change in coastal stream- restoration guidance and as the difficulty expected in constructing this project, a decision was made to terminate this project. The project would have resulted in the removal of some forested riparian areas as well as the establishment of some stream channels in locations where it was difficult to determine if stream channels had historically existed. The Black Gum Creek was also a very large stream- mitigation project that had been secured via the full-delivery process. The project was intended to produce 10,000 warm stream credits. The full- delivery provider was unable to implement the project due to the new coastal stream- restoration guidance. These decisions to drop these projects ( and replace them with other projects) reflect the joint collaborative efforts on the part of EEP and the regulatory agencies to continue to improve the type and quality of stream- restoration efforts in the coastal plain. Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 23 LUMBER 03040206 Outstanding Mitigation Required Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent Streams 0 0 Riparian 0.14 0 Non- Riparian 1.113 0.02 Coastal Marsh 0 0 Background: The Lumber 03040206 CU has seen limited activity since the inception of the Wetlands Restoration Program in 1998. EEP has four MOU requirements and one MOA requirement in Lumber 03040206, including two riparian and three nonriparian. The magnitude of all five requirements is relatively small in comparison to other areas of this river basin. One of the three MOU riparian- and nonriparian- wetland requirements due is being partially met. The MOA program had one nonriparian wetland requirement in this CU that is covered with a riparian asset. CU Action Plan: Due to low activity in this CU in the MOA program and no new activity for the MOU program, EEP has not initiated a full LWP, and the amount of current and anticipated future impacts does not warrant initiating that action. EEP has identified one available mitigation site in the CU; however, the credits generated by the site are not sufficient to meet needs for both the MOU and MOA programs. EEP will propose that the PACG invoke the small impacts policy for the nonriparian wetland requirements approved in the amendment to the MOU signed on March 8, 2007. Currently, there are no riparian wetland assets in an adjacent CU. EEP staff will continue to actively search in the CU for suitable areas to conduct a small- to medium- sized mitigation site for current and future needs. However, due to the surplus- assets issues associated with adjacent CUs, procurement and implementation for future MOA mitigation needs within Lumber 03040206 is currently suspended pending resolution of the interagency surplus- assets discussions. LUMBER 03040207 Outstanding Mitigation Required Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent Streams 15 0 Riparian 0.03 0 Non- Riparian 0 0 Coastal Marsh 0 0 Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 24 Background: Lumber 03040207 currently has 15 stream credit and 0.03 riparian credit shortfalls to meet current regulatory requirements. CU Immediate Action Plan: The Watershed Planning and Project Implementation Group has been assigned to identify and implement a stream project that generates a minimum of 1,846 stream credits and 4.21 riparian wetland credits. These amounts represent the total needed to meet current outstanding needs plus all future projected needs within the CU for the current TIP. NEUSE 03020201 Outstanding Mitigation Required Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent Streams 874 614 Riparian 0 0 Non- Riparian 0 0 Coastal Marsh 0 0 Background: Neuse 03020201 is one of the most active areas in North Carolina where EEP provides mitigation. Consequently, EEP is heavily involved in watershed-planning and restoration- project development. Historically, EEP has been highly successful at meeting all the mitigation needs in this CU. The current nonconformance is associated with a project falling off of the asset list due to an option expiring. Property acquisition is continuing and this project is expected to be acquired soon. CU Immediate Action Plan: Completed acquisition of the project that had the expired option will bring the CU back into conformance. EEP has in development 19,033 stream credits, 10.20 riparian credits and 0.10 nonriparian credits associated with three identified projects. EEP has also initiated procurement of an additional 18,100 stream credits through the existing LWPs. EEP also plans on utilizing 14,000 existing HQP stream credits over the next few years for MOA program needs. Due to the surplus- assets issue, EEP has suspended all MOA procurement in Neuse 03020201 pending the outcomes of the interagency discussions. The suspended amounts of mitigation include 28,600 stream credits and 10 riparian credits discussed in the preceding paragraph. Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 25 NEUSE 03020202 Outstanding Mitigation Required Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent Streams 1,981 2,985 Riparian 0 0 Non- Riparian 0 0 Coastal Marsh 0 0 Background: Neuse 03020202 had one permit requirement within the MOU program come due last quarter. EEP issued a Request for Proposals in this CU in the fourth quarter, but opening of these full- delivery projects was placed on hold pending the NCDOT surplus- assets discussions. These full- delivery projects were opened and evaluated for contracting during the current quarter. A contract award for a new full delivery project is expected to take place during the next quarter. Once the project has been awarded and instituted, this CU will once again be fully compliant. CU Immediate Action Plan: The immediate action plan is to contract one or more of the full- delivery projects within the MOU program to meet the outstanding mitigation needs. TAR- PAMLICO 03020105 Outstanding Mitigation Required Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent Streams 146 0 Riparian 0 0 Non- Riparian 0 0 Coastal Marsh 0.10 0.10 Background: The Tar- Pamlico 03020105 CU has seen virtually no activity since the inception of the Wetlands Restoration Program in 1998. Prior to 2006, the MOU program had only accepted one conservation easement as mitigation on behalf of USACE. However, recent activity has been very high: three riparian, 17 nonriparian and one coastal marsh payments have been made during the last year and came due. Although activity has been high, the magnitude is very small. The MOU program currently has one small coastal- marsh wetland requirement ( 0.2 coastal- marsh credits) that is unmet. The MOA program has one small stream and one small nonriparian requirement associated with one permit that is due. The permit’s nonriparian- mitigation needs are fully covered. The permit’s stream requirement is currently covered with 10: 1 HQP assets, but the remaining restoration requirement ( 146 stream restoration credits) is outstanding. Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 26 CU Action Plan: The primary plan for this CU had been to utilize the Full Delivery Project ( FDP) process to meet current and future stream needs. EEP had received one FDP project that was not accepted during the fourth quarter. Consequently, EEP identified the EEP Watershed Planning and Project Implementation staff to procure the remaining stream mitigation needs. EEP has already secured sufficient riparian- and nonriparian- wetland mitigation sufficient to offset all projected riparian and nonriparian mitigation needs for the seven- year TIP, and has ceased procurement for additional riparian and nonriparian mitigation until new mitigation needs are identified. For the current and future coastal- marsh mitigation needs, EEP proposed the procurement and restoration of the Collins Tract, a very large and rare potential coastal- marsh restoration project located in Pasquotank 03010205, but only a few miles from the border of the Tar- Pamlico 03020105 and Pasquotank 03010205 CU boundary. EEP has requested of the regulatory agencies that the service area for the project contain both CUs due both to its location and the projection that nearly all impacts are expected to occur at the boundary between the two CUs. The agencies submitted comments to the proposed mitigation tract during the third quarter. Some agencies commented that the Collins Tract may be considered creation rather than restoration. Additionally, during the fourth quarter, the forecasted coastal- marsh need ( approximately 14.86 total coastal- marsh credits) in this CU is currently in question as NCDOT may be required to produce on- site mitigation rather than procure off- site mitigation through the EEP. At this time, procurement of MOA mitigation needs for stream and coastal marsh is on hold pending the Tri- Party surplus- assets mitigation discussions. The Tar Pamlico river basin has multiple other CUs that contain surplus mitigation. Procurement of new mitigation sites within this CU are on hold until options to utilize these other assets are exhausted Since the coastal marsh needs within the MOU program were also intended to be met with portions of the Collins Tract, meeting this requirement is also delayed. Note: The Bonner Bridge project is a future MOA projected impact. The PACG-TC is looking at coastal issues that may affect this CU in the future. The Bonner Bridge spans both Tar- Pamlico 03020105 and Pasquotank 03010205 CUs. WHITE OAK 03030001 Outstanding Mitigation Required Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent Streams 0 0 Riparian 0 0 Non- Riparian 0.2 0.2 Coastal Marsh 0 0 Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 27 Background: EEP currently has significant amounts of unused nonriparian mitigation credits in White Oak 03030001 originating from the Hoffman Forest Mitigation Bank. Unfortunately, the Hoffman Forest Mitigation Bank has a service area restricted to Onslow County impacts. CU Action Plan: EEP has assigned the Watershed Planning and Project Implementation group to identify and acquire one nonriparian credit. To address projected future needs, the Watershed Planning and Project Implementation already identified two projects representing 3,000 stream credits and five riparian credits and is looking for additional projects that would add an extra 5.39 riparian credits. However, due to the surplus- asset issue, procurement of wetland- and stream- mitigation sites for the MOA program is on hold until further notice for the White Oak river basin. The White Oak LWP is also examining potential alternative, nontraditional forms of mitigation that may be appropriate for this watershed. YADKIN 03040105 Outstanding Mitigation Required Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent Streams 0 0 Riparian 4.27 0 Non- Riparian 0 0 Coastal Marsh 0 0 Background: Yadkin 03040105 is similar in some ways to Catawba 03050103. Yadkin 03040105 does not have many wetlands- restoration opportunities present within the CU. It is also experiencing some of the same development pressures that are present in the lower Catawba. Yadkin 03040105 includes portions of Charlotte, Huntersville, Mooresville, Davidson, Concord, Kannapolis, Monroe, Mint Hill and other smaller towns. It should be considered a CU of concern for future wetlands- restoration efforts. Yadkin 0304105 is different than the lower Catawba in that it has more rural landscape remaining within the watershed and is larger. EEP has invested heavily in local watershed planning in the Yadkin 0304105 and expects to generate both stream and wetlands projects from these endeavors in the future. Due to the magnitude of mitigation needs projected in this CU, EEP has also used the full- delivery process to secure mitigation. CU Action Plan: Historically, the action plan in this CU included the significant use of the FDP program to secure stream and wetland mitigation needs due to the extreme Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 28 magnitude of need. These efforts have been very successful in generating stream restoration, but not wetland restoration. The most recent RFP had submittals containing five riparian wetland credits and 0.5 nonriparian credits that were not awarded due to high costs. To develop mitigation assets in Yadkin 05, EEP is using a multi- pronged approach. EEP has expanded the Rocky River LWP to Phase IV; plans to acquire and implement existing Tier II and III projects; identify and implement using the Design- Bid- Build DBB) process at least five additional stream- restoration projects, and two riparian- wetland projects; and maximize use of existing HQP credits. A LWP is being initiated in the Goose Creek watershed in partnership with resource agencies to generate mitigation opportunities that will also address endangered- species issues. The EEP Monitoring Section is also investigating whether the Cato project produced nonriparian or riparian credits as a component of the priority one stream- restoration project. Finally, EEP plans to issue another full- delivery RFP for the CU. The full- delivery RFP release date is on hold pending the results of the success of acquiring identified DBB stream and wetland projects. The proposal to issue another RFP has also been placed on hold due to the pending Tri- Party surplus- assets discussions. Due to the surplus- asset issue, procurement of wetland- only mitigation sites for the MOA program is on hold until further notice for the Yadkin River Basin. SECTION VII: FUTURE CONFORMANCE As noted throughout the report, many mitigation procurement initiatives have been placed on hold pending the ongoing discussions between the Tri- Party agencies on the issue of surplus assets. These procurement holds may result in future nonconformance with the terms of the MOA or MOU permit requirements. Consequently, permit compliance is expected to continue to drop slightly while these discussions are ongoing and new permit requirements come online. However, the magnitude of this drop is moderated by the amount of advanced mitigation already completed for Year 5 and 6 projected mitigation needs. EEP is working closely with the Tri- Party agencies to identify the appropriate course of action regarding mitigation procurement and utilization of existing assets to meet existing and future needs. For the most part, these procurement holds will only affect the MOA mitigation program. Procurement of mitigation for the MOU mitigation program will continue. Both programs are affected by the delays where RFPs have been placed on hold or a single project had been identified to meet MOU and MOA mitigation program needs. Additionally, in March 2007 Congress re- authorized the USACE’s nationwide permit authority. USACE initiated a public- review process for revisions to its general permit conditions, causing a three- month hiatus in USACE’s permit processing. This delay has affected six EEP projects, some of which were Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 29 delayed while the public- review process ran its course. Others were held by EEP, pending the outcome of the public- review process. EEP is expediting other steps in the project- permitting and construction process for these six projects, and is hopeful that ultimately the projects will experience only small delays in final implementation. However, it is possible that the program will miss season- specific planting windows resulting in delayed mitigation and temporary non- conformance in these CUs in the 2008 – 2009 time frame. The projects affected by the permitting delays were: Mitigation assets estimated as of June 30, 2007. All are subject to change. Project name CU Stream Wetlands Buffer Adkins Branch ( phase 11) Neuse 03020202 10,137 feet 21.55 acres Brock Neuse 03020204 1,850 feet 1.65 acres 6.88 acres Johnson- Dale Neuse 03020203 1,500 feet 6 acres Oakley Crossroads Tar- Pam 03020103 3,800 feet 6.30 acres 20.9 acres Stallings Neuse 03020204 4,476 feet 34 acres 43.95 acres Tate Farm New River 05050001 30,285 feet 11.60 acres Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 30 Appendix A: EEP Gross Asset List of Tier 1 Stream and Wetland Restoration, Enhancement, Creation, and Preservation Sites Alphabetically ( High Quality Preservation Sites are not listed in table below). GIS ID Project Name Tier River Basin 8- digit CU Stream Restoration Stream Enhancment I Stream Enhancement II Stream Preservation Riparian Restoration Riparian Creation Riparian Enhancement Riparian Preservation Nonriparian Restoration Nonriparian Creation Nonriparian Enhancement Nonriparian Preservation Coastal Marsh Restoration Coastal Marsh Creation Coastal Marsh Enhancement Coastal Marsh Preservation Stream Buffer 92546 601 North Property 1 YADKIN 03040105 3,000 92545 601 West Property 1 YADKIN 03040105 4,500 9 Abbott 1 NEUSE 03020201 584 6 ABC 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020104 2,375 101.63 9.24 27.57 10.90 92488 Acre Swamp Creek 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020104 7,000 30.00 16.10 92244 Adam's Creek Sea Gate Woods 1 n/ a NEUSE 03020204 122.00 7 Adkins Branch ( Phase II) 1 NEUSE 03020202 10,137 21.55 10 Afton Run 1 YADKIN 03040105 261 92526 Anderson Swamp 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020102 12.00 7.00 92487 Armstrong Property 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020104 2,000 20.00 4.50 17 Back Creek 1 YADKIN 03040105 2,167 1,480 0.30 3.50 92666 Badin Inn 1 YADKIN 03040104 4,050 19 Bailey Fork ( EBX) ( 16- D04006) 1 CATAWBA 03050101 6,017 9,765 11.80 5.30 12.60 20 Bailey Fork II ( WRC) ( 16- D04006) 1 CATAWBA 03050101 5,500 9.50 21 Ballance Farm 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 196.27 49.65 25.35 50.00 22 Barbara Squires Site 1 CAPE FEAR 03030005 24 Beamon's Run 1 n/ a NEUSE 03020203 26 Bear Creek ( Phillips Tract) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 4,143 27 Bear Swamp Creek 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020101 1,460 2.40 28 Beaver Creek 1 YADKIN 03040101 4,266 92217 Beaverdam Creek 1 CATAWBA 03050101 12,427 567 2,603 92586 Beaverdam Creek and Trib ( Parker Site) 1 YADKIN 03040105 2,933 92530 Beaverdam Swamp 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 10,200 9.00 29 Benbow Park 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 1,122 780 32 Benson Grove 1 NEUSE 03020201 33 Bethel Church 1 YADKIN 03040101 92532 Big Cedar Creek 1 YADKIN 03040105 11,088 1,090 580 739 Big Harris Creek I 1 BROAD 03050105 2,500 500 92492 Big Harris Creek II 1 BROAD 03050105 6,000 5,000 2,000 2.00 92715 Big Warrior & Little Warrior Creek 1 YADKIN 03040101 50 36 Billy's Creek 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020101 1,901 200 2.60 38 Bishop Road ( 1 mi to CU 05) 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020104 1.00 61.60 112.60 521.00 3.30 92516 Blockhouse Creek 1 BROAD 03050105 4,450 1,410 800 5.00 92210 Blounts Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 8,000 40 Blue Mitigation Site 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 4,200 112.35 731 Bogue Sound ( Weeks Property) 1 WHITE OAK 03020106 0.18 439 Bold Run Creek 1 NEUSE 03020201 1,454 0 176 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 27.10 44 Bowman Site 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 1,500 200 2.34 46 Branson Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 2,200 47 Briles 1 YADKIN 03040103 1,446 1,182 1.00 92333 Brock 1 NEUSE 03020204 - 573 1.65 6.88 49 Brock Mill Pond 1 NEUSE 03020204 3,400 109.00 52 Brown Bark Park 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 775 2,059 53 Brown Branch 1 CATAWBA 03050101 5,107 120 92591 Brown Branch ( Willowbrook Park) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 350 2,850 92207 Brown Farm 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 24.58 3.32 92517 Brown Marsh Swamp 1 LUMBER 03040204 5,000 5.00 1 of 9 Updated 9/ 30/ 07 Appendix A: EEP Gross Asset List of Tier 1 Stream and Wetland Restoration, Enhancement, Creation, and Preservation Sites Alphabetically ( High Quality Preservation Sites are not listed in table below). GIS ID Project Name Tier River Basin 8- digit CU Stream Restoration Stream Enhancment I Stream Enhancement II Stream Preservation Riparian Restoration Riparian Creation Riparian Enhancement Riparian Preservation Nonriparian Restoration Nonriparian Creation Nonriparian Enhancement Nonriparian Preservation Coastal Marsh Restoration Coastal Marsh Creation Coastal Marsh Enhancement Coastal Marsh Preservation Stream Buffer 54 Brush Creek 1 NEW 05050001 1,350 490 1,750 55 Brushy Fork 1 YADKIN 03040101 4,400 3,000 743 Bryan Blvd/ Oakridge 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 0.00 92603 Buffalo Creek 1 NEUSE 03020201 6,100 56 Bugaboo Creek 1 YADKIN 03040101 6,230 57 Bull Farm 1 CAPE FEAR 03030006 2.18 58 Burnt Mill Creek 1 n/ a CAPE FEAR 03030007 0.80 60 Bush Island 1 LUMBER 03040203 300.00 63 Caldwell Station/ Foley/ EcoPark 1 CATAWBA 03050101 3,600 420 1.60 5.00 65 Camp Branch @ Bishop Site 1 YADKIN 03040105 1,900 1,190 4,400 7,000 1.00 7.00 66 Camp Lejune USMC 1 WHITE OAK 03030001 69 Cane Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 2,277 6.90 92325 Cane Creek 1 ROANOKE 03010104 12,720 1,232 3,499 463 92521 Cane Creek ( FD) 1 BROAD 03050105 4,470 4,860 1,670 4.40 5.00 92268 Carbonton Dam 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 90,484 70 Casey Tract 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 71 Cat Creek 1 LITTLE TENNESSEE 06010202 4,358 1,082 1,490 6.00 72 Cato 1 YADKIN 03040105 2,295 73 Caviness 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 937 11.00 77 Chapel Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 1,000 400 79 Charles Creek 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 1.16 0.60 87 Chavis Park 1 NEUSE 03020201 2,210 2.30 90 City Pond 1 YADKIN 03040201 10,667 91 Clayhill Farm 1 WHITE OAK 03020106 9,599 2,010 21.60 1.80 3.90 79.90 52.00 110.50 92 Clear Creek 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 1,200 93 Cleghorn Creek ( 16- D04010) 1 BROAD 03050105 5,167 94 Coddle Creek Tributary ( Indian Run) 1 YADKIN 03040105 1,840 1,000 1,190 742 Collington Cut 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 92205 Collins Site 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 9,786 1,070 750 96 Company Swamp 1 ROANOKE 03010107 557.43 92226 Conoconnara Swamp 1 ROANOKE 03010107 5,000 69.00 8.00 71.00 97 Corbett Tract 1 Lumber 03040207 0.00 101 Cox Property 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020104 0.00 99 Cox Site 1 NEUSE 03020201 7,263 285 25.88 16.90 105 Cross Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 2,400 92329 Crowns West 1 WHITE OAK 03030001 3,800 92547 Cutatwhiskie creek 1 CHOWAN 03010204 2,818 2,786 12.30 92269 Daniels Farm # 1 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020101 31.70 92229 Daniels Farm # 2 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020101 13.70 4.50 10.30 0.70 0.70 0.11 92543 Davis Branch 1 YADKIN 03040105 5,025 110 Deaton 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 255 13.70 117 Dismal Swamp 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 15.46 20.80 252.78 91.00 92533 Dog Bite Creek 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010108 2,410 1,235 80 119 Dowd Dairy 1 CAPE FEAR 03030005 4.85 545.33 92544 Duke Swamp 1 CHOWAN 03010203 5,000 15.00 92350 Dula Thorofare @ Bishop Site 1 YADKIN 03040104 2,568 2,900 3,200 5.60 0.94 3.20 121 Dutchman's Creek 1 NEUSE 03020201 2 of 9 Updated 9/ 30/ 07 Appendix A: EEP Gross Asset List of Tier 1 Stream and Wetland Restoration, Enhancement, Creation, and Preservation Sites Alphabetically ( High Quality Preservation Sites are not listed in table below). GIS ID Project Name Tier River Basin 8- digit CU Stream Restoration Stream Enhancment I Stream Enhancement II Stream Preservation Riparian Restoration Riparian Creation Riparian Enhancement Riparian Preservation Nonriparian Restoration Nonriparian Creation Nonriparian Enhancement Nonriparian Preservation Coastal Marsh Restoration Coastal Marsh Creation Coastal Marsh Enhancement Coastal Marsh Preservation Stream Buffer 122 Dye Branch I Stormwater BMP 1 n/ a YADKIN 03040105 92255 Dye Branch II Stream Restoration 1 YADKIN 03040105 3,000 123 East Tarboro Canal 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020103 2,989 1,876 8.27 125 Elizabeth City State BMP 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 0 92665 Elk Branch 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010108 3,075 2,540 126 Elk Shoals RFP* 1 CATAWBA 03050101 4,813 563 5.30 127 Ellerbee Creek 1 NEUSE 03020201 6,279 12.00 92520 Ellington Branch 1 ROANOKE 03010106 5,000 128 Ephemeral Pool 1 LUMBER 03040203 92552 Farrar Dairy 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 11,531 800 150 33.30 39.90 43.20 92185 Five Mile Branch 1 YADKIN 03040102 17,595 4.00 4.00 138 Fletcher- Meritor site 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 4,000 10.00 440 Flintrock Farm 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 3,000 30.00 92486 Floogie Site 1 ROANOKE 03010107 10,251 25.00 139 Forest Hills 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 2,960 92609 Four Mile Creek - DBB 1 CATAWBA 03050103 2,223 141 Freedom Park 1 CATAWBA 03050103 4,400 142 Friedburg Marsh 1 Yadkin 03040101 92228 Gatlin Swamp 1 ROANOKE 03010107 125.00 143 Gibson Pond 1 Yadkin 03040201 36.70 144 Gillespie Golf Course 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 2,709 3,086 854 Glade Creek 1 NEW 05050001 2,705 125 813 0.33 92343 Glade Creek II 1 NEW 05050001 2,500 1.00 1.50 92206 Glen Raven 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 3,290 700 145 Goldsboro Housing Authority 1 NEUSE 03020201 2,100 3.54 147 Goose Creek 1 NEUSE 03020201 1,800 3.00 92710 Goose Creek ( Earl Haigler) 1 YADKIN 03040105 92709 Goose Creek ( Greene site) 1 YADKIN 03040105 0 148 Goshen Swamp 1 CAPE FEAR 03030007 0.00 92219 Gray Farm 1 CATAWBA 03050101 7,610 15.70 671 Greenbriar Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 3,028 2,896 4,000 7.64 7.50 153 Gregory 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020102 6,500 75.00 155 Grimesland ( Phase II) 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020103 48.80 156 Grimesland Site ( Phase I) 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020103 7.80 348.00 158 Grove Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030007 6.00 10.20 352.00 3.90 7.60 716 Gurley 1 NEUSE 03020203 0 162 Hall Branch 1 YADKIN 03040201 2,000 2.50 163 Hammock's State Park 1 WHITE OAK 03020106 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 165 Hanging Rock Creek ( A3) 1 WATAUGA 06010103 2,767 279 92230 Harrell Site 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020101 6,987 15.00 18.90 167 Haw Branch ( 16- D04015) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030007 10,000 25.00 92316 Haw River Bouchard 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 30.00 92238 Haw River Swamp I 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 12.00 168 Haw River Swamp II ( 16- D04011) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 14.70 2.50 18.00 169 Haw River Tract 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 80.00 719 Haw's Run 1 CAPE FEAR 03030007 6.72 25.00 171.00 49.36 99.00 11.00 170 Heath Dairy Road 1 YADKIN 03040103 8,700 2,900 700 3 of 9 Updated 9/ 30/ 07 Appendix A: EEP Gross Asset List of Tier 1 Stream and Wetland Restoration, Enhancement, Creation, and Preservation Sites Alphabetically ( High Quality Preservation Sites are not listed in table below). GIS ID Project Name Tier River Basin 8- digit CU Stream Restoration Stream Enhancment I Stream Enhancement II Stream Preservation Riparian Restoration Riparian Creation Riparian Enhancement Riparian Preservation Nonriparian Restoration Nonriparian Creation Nonriparian Enhancement Nonriparian Preservation Coastal Marsh Restoration Coastal Marsh Creation Coastal Marsh Enhancement Coastal Marsh Preservation Stream Buffer 172 Helms 1 YADKIN 03040105 1,400 0.40 175 High Vista 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 1,500 2,300 176 Hillcrest Bay ( 16- D04011) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 15.00 177 Hillsdale Park 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 5,302 138 92523 Holly Grove 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 13,350 5,940 180 Hominy Swamp Creek 1 NEUSE 03020203 2,232 2.60 92251 Hoppers Creek - Melton Farm 1 CATAWBA 03050101 3,500 800 1.00 182 Horsepen Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 1.77 183 Howell Woods 1 NEUSE 03020201 5,251 34.00 4.00 64.00 38.00 5.50 184 Huskanaw Swamp 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020103 23.60 185 Indian Creek 1 CATAWBA 03050102 0 192 Irwin Creek Whitehurst Road 1 CATAWBA 03050103 1,500 1.50 1.04 194 Jacksonville Country Club 1 WHITE OAK 03030001 3,272 376 92550 Jarmans Oak 1 WHITE OAK 03030001 6,418 555 11.00 2.00 751 Jenny's Gut ( Perquimans County High School) 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 2,500 197 Johnson Site ( Hunting Creek) 1 YADKIN 03040102 2,200 661 Johnson- Dale Stream Restoration ( Payne Dale) 1 NEUSE 03020203 1,500 6.00 198 Jones Creek ( 16- D04020) 1 YADKIN 03040201 3,068 5,150 25.00 2.70 92614 Jordan Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 5,000 199 Jumping Run Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 4,480 67.00 200 Jumping Run Creek 1 WHITE OAK 03020106 3.00 201 Juniper Bay 1 LUMBER 03040203 590.08 204 Ken- Cox ( Millstone Creek) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 3,300 2.00 4.55 205 Kentwood Park 1 NEUSE 03020201 1,070 350 2.90 206 Key Branch 1 YADKIN 03040104 36.80 3.60 208 Kings Creek 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 2,300 209 Knobs Creek 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 19.00 210 La Grange 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 2.00 4.00 212 Lake Wheeler 1 NEUSE 03020201 0.00 92707 Laxon Creek( Racey site) 1 WATAUGA 06010103 1,160 215 Lengyel 1 NEUSE 03020204 5.64 4.70 733 Lewis Creek 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 2,000 219 Lick Creek ( 16- D04011) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 9,500 92372 Little Alamance Creek ( Burlington Park) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 2,850 221 Little Beaver Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 5,298 4.75 0.97 627 Little Contentnea Creek ( Farmville C. C.) 1 NEUSE 03020203 980 1,330 6.70 224 Little Grassy Creek 1 ROANOKE 03010102 5,000 12,300 92651 Little Ivy Creek ( Barnhill Site) 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 1,200 92192 Little Lick Creek 1 NEUSE 03020201 2,750 300 1.40 1.53 1.00 5.24 225 Little McQueen 1 LUMBER 03040203 0.00 856 Little Pine Creek II 1 NEW 05050001 2,700 4.00 226 Little River 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 4,400 5.00 50.00 42.00 228 Little Sugar Creek I 1 CATAWBA 03050103 0.00 749 Little Troublesome 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 2,188 2,754 1.90 4.50 92534 Little White Oak Creek 1 BROAD 03050105 18,200 4 of 9 Updated 9/ 30/ 07 Appendix A: EEP Gross Asset List of Tier 1 Stream and Wetland Restoration, Enhancement, Creation, and Preservation Sites Alphabetically ( High Quality Preservation Sites are not listed in table below). GIS ID Project Name Tier River Basin 8- digit CU Stream Restoration Stream Enhancment I Stream Enhancement II Stream Preservation Riparian Restoration Riparian Creation Riparian Enhancement Riparian Preservation Nonriparian Restoration Nonriparian Creation Nonriparian Enhancement Nonriparian Preservation Coastal Marsh Restoration Coastal Marsh Creation Coastal Marsh Enhancement Coastal Marsh Preservation Stream Buffer 92327 Lloyd Site 1 WHITE OAK 03030001 4,750 3.30 3.10 92515 Logan Creek 1 SAVANNAH 03060101 3,310 1,600 0 3,115 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 231 Long Creek 1 CATAWBA 03050101 1.64 233 Long Swamp 1 Lumber 03040203 0.00 234 Louisburg ( UT to Tar River) 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020101 1,937 3.05 236 Lowell Mill ( 16- D04008) 1 NEUSE 03020201 34,990 237 Lower Creek 1 CATAWBA 03050101 3,500 239 Mallard Creek 1 YADKIN 03040105 239 Mallard Creek 1 CATAWBA 03050103 0.00 715 Mann's Harbor 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 92248 Mark's Creek TESC 1 NEUSE 03020201 3,693 17.90 241 Mary's Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 2,096 5.40 718 Mashoe's Road 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 29.32 130.94 92328 Mason Farm 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020105 16.00 20.00 443 McCain Property 1 YADKIN 03040103 2,445 242 McDonald's Pond 1 YADKIN 03040201 2,969 770 4,410 17.70 4.20 19.00 92604 McGowan Creek 1 NEUSE 03020201 30.80 243 McIntyre Creek @ Hornets Nest Park 1 CATAWBA 03050101 4,800 1.50 17.07 244 McIntyre Property 1 CAPE FEAR 03030005 12.30 9.02 85.76 92573 McKee Creek 1 YADKIN 03040105 1,650 4,500 245 McLeansville 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 6.00 92351 Meadowbranch ( Fivemile Branch) 1 LUMBER 03040203 25.00 30.00 92706 Meat Camp Creek ( Miller site) 1 WATAUGA 06010103 652 247 Meredell Farm Site 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 3,865 4,704 5,136 11.80 92703 Middle Fork Creek ( Phillips/ Willis) 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 4,480 250 Mildred Woods 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020103 128.50 8.00 251 Mill Branch 1 LUMBER 03040206 3,282 1,750 0.25 0.44 35.80 1.50 253 Mill Creek ( formerly Uwharrie Heritage) 1 YADKIN 03040103 3,598 1,912 14,675 3.00 255 Mineral Springs Branch ( Burnt Mill Creek) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030007 1,190 1,350 256 Mocassin Creek 1 NEUSE 03020203 311 0.38 4.93 43.21 3.00 92227 Modlin Site 1 ROANOKE 03010107 40.00 725 Moore Property 1 NEUSE 03020201 7.10 30.90 4.90 6.60 92314 Mooresville School Site - Rocky River 1 YADKIN 03040105 3,430 1.00 92527 Morgan Creek 1 BROAD 03050105 8,171 5,216 4,309 92240 Morgan Creek ( Bolin Stewardship Tract) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 3,575 92531 Morgan Creek ( French Broad) 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010106 4,857 715 5.00 258 Morgan Creek Floodplain 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 19.00 260 Mud Creek 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 15.60 737 Muddy Creek ( Randolph/ Duncan Properties) 1 CATAWBA 03050101 3,500 261 Naked Creek 1 YADKIN 03040101 3,000 92330 New Light Creek ( NCDOT) 1 NEUSE 03020201 92497 Newfound Creek 1 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 5,000 6,600 800 441 Nicholls Farm ( Troublesome Creek) 1 CHOWAN 03010203 1,700 3,300 15.00 5.00 10.00 92611 North Muddy Creek 1 CATAWBA 03050101 5,014 10.50 1.25 4.30 2.40 271 North River 1 n/ a WHITE OAK 03020106 250.00 5 of 9 Updated 9/ 30/ 07 Appendix A: EEP Gross Asset List of Tier 1 Stream and Wetland Restoration, Enhancement, Creation, and Preservation Sites Alphabetically ( High Quality Preservation Sites are not listed in table below). GIS ID Project Name Tier River Basin 8- digit CU Stream Restoration Stream Enhancment I Stream Enhancement II Stream Preservation Riparian Restoration Riparian Creation Riparian Enhancement Riparian Preservation Nonriparian Restoration Nonriparian Creation Nonriparian Enhancement Nonriparian Preservation Coastal Marsh Restoration Coastal Marsh Creation Coastal Marsh Enhancement Coastal Marsh Preservation Stream Buffer 272 Northgate Park ( Ellerbe) 1 NEUSE 03020201 1,800 5.00 273 Oakley Crossroads 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020103 3,800 2.94 2.25 1.11 20.90 274 Oakwood Cemetary 1 NEUSE 03020201 1,300 92708 Obids Creek ( Wild Site) 1 NEW 05050001 1,819 275 Open Springs 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 4,520 4.70 92700 Paint Fork Creek( Brigmon Site) 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 5,175 92702 Paint Fork Creek( Fosson) 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 1,700 276 Paschal GC ( Richland Ck) 1 NEUSE 03020201 2,900 5.14 279 Payne Dairy 1 CATAWBA 03050101 5,177 470 1,350 6.40 25.40 280 Pea Island 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 92469 Peeler Creek 1 YADKIN 03040101 2,400 1,500 1,000 281 Pembroke Creek I 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 282 Pembroke Creek II 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 - 0.09 283 Perry Property ( UT to Pembroke Creek) 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 4,400 17.00 6.00 1 Philips 1 NEUSE 03020201 92518 Pinch Gut Tributary 1 ROANOKE 03010103 10,000 92607 Plemmons- Kirkpatrick Spring Creek WRC 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 680 92549 Plum Creek 1 LUMBER 03040207 80.00 286 Pott Creek II 1 CATAWBA 03050102 10,054 92548 Powell Property 1 CHOWAN 03010203 3,310 70.00 289 Prestonwood G. C. 1 NEUSE 03020201 4,123 5.30 291 Price Park 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 1,776 292 Pridgen Flats 1 CAPE FEAR 03030006 293 Privateer Farms 1 CAPE FEAR 03030005 34,005 402.50 25.00 294 Purlear Creek 1 YADKIN 03040101 11,500 2.00 2.00 295 Purlear Creek II 1 YADKIN 03040101 2,620 1.05 0.30 92522 Puzzle Creek 1 BROAD 03050105 5,300 297 R- 2719 BA 1 NEUSE 03020202 0 92220 Reed's Creek 1 CATAWBA 03050101 4.20 2.20 301 Reedy Branch 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 3,150 303 Rich Fork FDP ( Bodenheimer- Parker) 1 YADKIN 03040103 3,000 20.00 2.00 304 Richland Creek 1 NEUSE 03020201 415 307 River Bend 1 ROANOKE 03010104 89.00 19.00 308 Rocky Branch 1 YADKIN 03040102 4,400 1.50 310 Rocky Branch ( NCSU) Phase I 1 NEUSE 03020201 311 Rocky Branch ( NCSU) Phase II 1 NEUSE 03020201 312 Roquist 1 ROANOKE 03010107 500 45.00 3,386.00 317 Rowan Branch 1 CAPE FEAR 03030006 600 10.00 67.00 92675 SALT ( Sandhill Area Land Trust) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 0 320 Sand Shoals 1 WHITE OAK 03020106 321 Sandy Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 5.68 2.90 322 Sandy Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 2,700 3.60 732 Sandy Mush ( Phase II) 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 32,320 325 Sawmill 1 NEUSE 03020204 0.28 - 1.08 0.18 0.24 0.81 92237 Second Creek Wetlands, Double Thumb 1 YADKIN 03040103 3.00 331 Seven Springs 1 NEUSE 03020202 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 92241 Sharpe Wetland Preservation 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 512 6.20 6 of 9 Updated 9/ 30/ 07 Appendix A: EEP Gross Asset List of Tier 1 Stream and Wetland Restoration, Enhancement, Creation, and Preservation Sites Alphabetically ( High Quality Preservation Sites are not listed in table below). GIS ID Project Name Tier River Basin 8- digit CU Stream Restoration Stream Enhancment I Stream Enhancement II Stream Preservation Riparian Restoration Riparian Creation Riparian Enhancement Riparian Preservation Nonriparian Restoration Nonriparian Creation Nonriparian Enhancement Nonriparian Preservation Coastal Marsh Restoration Coastal Marsh Creation Coastal Marsh Enhancement Coastal Marsh Preservation Stream Buffer 333 Sheperd's Tree 1 YADKIN 03040102 - 34 16.64 86.60 8.00 335 Silas Creek 1 YADKIN 03040101 782 3,662 336 Silver Creek ( 16- D04006) 1 CATAWBA 03050101 5,127 1,392 2,036 1,077 5.30 92218 Silver Creek- Conway 1 CATAWBA 03050101 4,520 92234 Simpson Wetland 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020104 30.00 92663 Sink Hole Creek 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010108 3,560 12,460 1,760 340 Sleepy Creek 1 NEUSE 03020202 96.40 39.20 380.00 341 Smith Creek Site 1 CAPE FEAR 03030007 0.00 343 Smith/ Austin Creek 1 NEUSE 03020201 6,178 3,982 794 32.00 344 Snow Creek 1 ROANOKE 03010103 3,850 855 345 South Buffalo Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 4.03 2.21 346 South Fork 1 CATAWBA 03050102 11,260 92701 South Fork Big Pine Creek( Charles/ McGinnis) 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 1,100 347 South Fork Hopper ( 16- D04006) 1 CATAWBA 03050101 7,213 5.10 1.00 9.90 348 South Muddy Creek ( 16- D04006) 1 CATAWBA 03050101 12,573 2,653 7.30 349 Sparta Bog 1 NEW 05050001 11.90 351 Speight Branch 1 NEUSE 03020201 1.00 1.22 19.00 353 Spring Branch 1 CAPE FEAR 03030007 0.00 354 Spring Valley Park 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 0 357 Stallings 1 NEUSE 03020204 4,159 5.30 5.50 17.00 43.20 360 Starmount Forest CC 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 0 360 Starmount Park 1 Cape Fear 03030002 363 Stillhouse Creek 1 NEUSE 03020201 1,391 2.00 364 Stone Mountain 1 YADKIN 03040101 5,745 2,576 1.62 365 Stonebridge 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 6,240 8.60 92556 Stricker Branch 1 YADKIN 03040105 3,000 366 Sturgeon City ( Phase I) 1 WHITE OAK 03030001 0.35 2.69 367 Sturgeon City ( Phase II) 1 WHITE OAK 03030001 2.50 368 Suck Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 2,963 7.80 369 Sussman's Park 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 370 Suther ( Dutch Buffalo Creek) 1 YADKIN 03040105 450 3,700 4,400 14.87 10.09 8.59 92249 Swift Creek Watershed Wetlands 1 NEUSE 03020201 65.20 92211 Tarlton Swamp 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 3,221 826 255 6.80 2.40 372 Tate Farm 1 NEW 05050001 1,880 1,202 18,288 16,204 2.36 4.52 0.02 92524 Thompson's Fork and Tributary 1 CATAWBA 03050101 5,000 4.30 92664 Three Mile Creek - Restoration Systems 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010108 6,764 210 5,865 1.30 2.00 379 Tick Creek ( Condoret Tract) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 3,011 92557 Timberlake ( Great Dismal Swamp) 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 5,000 92528 Tributary to Reedy Fork Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 6,800 500 388 Trout Cove Branch 1 HIWASSEE 06020002 1,876 389 Tucker Farm 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 392 Tulula Bog 1 LITTLE TENNESSEE 06010204 2,269 1,101 52.36 394 Underhill 1 NEUSE 03020201 395 Upper UT to Cane Creek ( Picard) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 6,604 92347 UT Bear Creek ( Weaver/ McLeod property) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 4,877 0.39 11.00 7 of 9 Updated 9/ 30/ 07 Appendix A: EEP Gross Asset List of Tier 1 Stream and Wetland Restoration, Enhancement, Creation, and Preservation Sites Alphabetically ( High Quality Preservation Sites are not listed in table below). GIS ID Project Name Tier River Basin 8- digit CU Stream Restoration Stream Enhancment I Stream Enhancement II Stream Preservation Riparian Restoration Riparian Creation Riparian Enhancement Riparian Preservation Nonriparian Restoration Nonriparian Creation Nonriparian Enhancement Nonriparian Preservation Coastal Marsh Restoration Coastal Marsh Creation Coastal Marsh Enhancement Coastal Marsh Preservation Stream Buffer 152 UT Green Mill Run/ Greenville Country Club 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020103 814 3,979 0.90 3.30 92383 UT Rocky River - Harris Road Middle 1 YADKIN 03040105 2,180 2.00 2.00 92598 UT to Back Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 3,622 92596 UT to Bald Creek 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010108 1,500 1,250 2,000 397 UT to Barnes Creek ( HurleySite) 1 YADKIN 03040103 2,975 1,000 1.00 3.12 92719 UT to Bear Creek ( Phillips) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 694 1,070 857 UT to Crab Creek 1 NEW 05050001 3,908 2,669 8.80 0.40 1.50 10.90 0.00 434 UT to Crooked Creek/ Speas Property 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020101 2,267 210 2.80 10.80 92712 Ut to Goose Creek( Haigler & Rowell) 1 YADKIN 03040105 92711 Ut to Goose Creek( Haigler/ Price) 1 YADKIN 03040105 92713 Ut to Goose Creek( Sasser/ Carriker) 1 YADKIN 03040105 92714 Ut to Goose Creek( Williams/ Matlock) 1 YADKIN 03040105 92471 UT to Hauser Creek 1 YADKIN 03040101 2,300 747 UT to Haw River 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 10,150 1,000 371 UT to Hendricks Creek ( Tarboro Canal) 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020103 1,300 4.00 181 UT to Indian Creek ( Hoover) 1 CATAWBA 03050102 1,350 1,200 92345 UT to Jumping Run Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 3,000 70.00 92705 Ut to Laxon Creek ( Carp site) 1 WATAUGA 06010103 538 290 UT to Lilliput Creek ( Hog Branch Ponds) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030005 3,238 20.45 7.83 96.46 87.74 314 UT to Little Coharie Creek ( Roseboro Site) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030006 1,630 700 92704 Ut to Peak Creek ( Bare site) 1 NEW 05050001 2,183 0.00 402 UT to Rocky River ( Smith Tract) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 1,335 955 9.20 403 UT to Sandy Creek ( Williams Tract) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 2,590 3.57 435 UT to South Fork Creek ( Hadley- Newlin) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 6,000 405 UT to South Fork Creek ( Stephens) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 4,500 847 UT to Uwharrie 1 YADKIN 03040103 3,500 3,500 2.00 1.00 442 UT to West Fork of Deep River 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 1,500 3,500 6.89 860 UT to Zack's Fork 1 CATAWBA 03050101 1,500 407 Valley Fields Farm Site 1 YADKIN 03040103 9,500 300 8,730 5.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 409 Wake Forest C. C. 1 NEUSE 03020201 3,400 6.50 412 Warrior Creek 1 YADKIN 03040101 10,585 450 413 Watts Property 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 1,000 4.00 40.00 414 Wells Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 2,986 2,757 417 White Oak Creek 1 NEUSE 03020201 8.68 3.34 1.60 18.62 419 Whitehall Reserve 1 CATAWBA 03050103 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 420 Whitelace Ck* 1 NEUSE 03020202 3,693 2,208 7.70 13.00 2.40 421 Wiggins Mill 1 NEUSE 03020203 247 12.96 5.00 423 Wike Property ( Lyle Creek) 1 CATAWBA 03050101 2,326 800 92508 Wildcat Branch 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 6,500 26.00 92551 Wolf Pond 1 YADKIN 03040105 4,500 92555 Woodlawn Branch 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 5,000 92606 WRC Bowlin- Peak Creek 1 NEW 05050001 1,551 432 Zack's Fork Ck RFP* 1 CATAWBA 03050101 3,900 8 of 9 Updated 9/ 30/ 07 Appendix A: EEP Gross Asset List of Tier 1 Stream and Wetland Restoration, Enhancement, Creation, and Preservation Sites Alphabetically ( High Quality Preservation Sites are not listed in table below). GIS ID Project Name Tier River Basin 8- digit CU Stream Restoration Stream Enhancment I Stream Enhancement II Stream Preservation Riparian Restoration Riparian Creation Riparian Enhancement Riparian Preservation Nonriparian Restoration Nonriparian Creation Nonriparian Enhancement Nonriparian Preservation Coastal Marsh Restoration Coastal Marsh Creation Coastal Marsh Enhancement Coastal Marsh Preservation Stream Buffer Mitigation Sites with Executed Mitigation Banking Instruments 23 Barra Farms I 1 CAPE FEAR 03030005 160.51 25 Bear Creek 1 NEUSE 03020202 88.00 34.00 300.00 103 Croatan Mitigation Bank ( Phase I) 1 NEUSE 03020204 92.00 311.60 1,026.90 108.00 104 Croatan Mitigation Bank ( Phase II) 1 NEUSE 03020204 49.60 91.60 37.80 1,094.90 956.90 253.00 106 Dale Tract 1 CAPE FEAR 03030005 126.30 17.90 111 Deep Creek ( Harding) 1 YADKIN 03040101 5,500 30.40 12.10 118 Dismal Swamp Full- Delivery ( aka Timberlake Farm) 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 180.00 275.00 745 Eagle Brunswick 1 CAPE FEAR 03030005 133 Finley- McMillan 1 CAPE FEAR 03030007 0 398.00 135 Fisher River Mit. Bank ( Ring FDP) 1 YADKIN 03040101 2,376 25.50 8.10 0.91 151 Great Dismal Swamp 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 553.00 92259 Hoffman Forest Bank ( MOA) 1 WHITE OAK 03030001 38.00 92258 Hoffman Forest Bank ( MOU) 1 WHITE OAK 03030001 12.00 179 Homestead ( wetland) 1 YADKIN 03040102 5,500 14.60 42.20 2.80 5.50 264 Neu- Con MBI ( Alexander) 1 NEUSE 03020203 18.50 0.90 2.00 92642 Neu- Con MBI ( Casey- King) 1 NEUSE 03020202 25.00 0.00 265 Neu- Con MBI ( Marston) 1 NEUSE 03020204 6,416 30.00 8.60 128.50 263 Neu- Con MBI ( Nahunta) 1 NEUSE 03020203 10,670 97.50 0.50 11.50 0.40 31.50 92643 Neu- Con MBI ( Tull Wooten) 1 NEUSE 03020202 125.00 0.00 92644 Neu- Con MBI ( Valentine) 1 NEUSE 03020203 386.00 114.00 262 Neu- Con MBI ( Westbrook) 1 NEUSE 03020201 5,414 10.00 50.00 50.00 20.00 285 Pott Creek 1 CATAWBA 03050102 3,500 5.45 31.32 0.76 0.36 746 Rowel Branch 1 CAPE FEAR 03030005 730 Scuppernong River Mitigation Bank 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 11.35 19.00 9 of 9 Updated 9/ 30/ 07 Appendix B: Summary of EEP Gross Assets ( High Quality Preservation SItes are not listed in table below) Gross Assets Stream Restoration Stream Enhancment I Stream Enhancement II Stream Preservation Riparian Restoration Riparian Creation Riparian Enhancement Riparian Preservation Nonriparian Restoration Nonriparian Creation Nonriparian Enhancement Nonriparian Preservation Coastal Marsh Restoration Coastal Marsh Creation Coastal Marsh Enhancement Coastal Marsh Preservation Stream Buffer Broad 54,258 6,410 10,076 9,279 11.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03050105 Total 54,258 6,410 10,076 9,279 11.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 5,167 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 49,091 6,410 10,076 9,279 11.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 Cape Fear 299,819 38,058 32,010 52,704 749.77 16.20 152.99 1,015.45 910.23 0.00 227.14 496.74 9.02 0.00 85.76 0.00 114.9 03030001 Located in White Oak 03030002 Total 71,010 26,775 23,264 19,463 84.43 6.00 8.69 170.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.3 MOU 38,536 20,005 16,074 12,575 35.05 0.00 3.47 158.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.3 MOA 32,474 6,770 7,190 6,888 49.38 6.00 5.22 12.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03030003 Total 132,214 9,757 6,596 9,136 6.07 0.00 2.00 10.54 2.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 102.6 MOU 39,809 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.8 MOA 92,405 9,757 6,596 9,136 6.07 0.00 2.00 10.54 2.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 94.8 03030004 Total 46,532 826 800 23,505 191.10 0.00 92.30 223.55 15.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 12,301 826 0 12,655 87.80 0.00 52.40 42.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 34,231 0 800 10,850 103.30 0.00 39.90 181.55 15.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03030005 Total 37,243 0 0 0 419.65 0.00 25.00 20.45 679.46 0.00 114.36 87.74 9.02 0.00 85.76 0.00 0.0 MOU 3,238 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.45 7.83 0.00 96.46 87.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 34,005 0 0 0 419.65 0.00 25.00 0.00 671.63 0.00 17.90 0.00 9.02 0.00 85.76 0.00 0.0 03030006 Total 1,630 700 0 600 10.00 0.00 0.00 67.00 160.51 0.00 2.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 1,630 700 0 600 10.00 0.00 0.00 67.00 160.51 0.00 2.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03030007 Total 11,190 0 1,350 0 38.52 10.20 25.00 523.00 53.26 0.00 106.60 409.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 11,190 0 1,350 0 25.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 0 0 0 0 12.72 10.20 25.00 523.00 53.26 0.00 106.60 409.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 Catawba 145,511 8,765 14,071 4,480 41.29 34.32 15.51 11.06 2.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 113.4 03050101 Total 112,724 6,065 14,071 4,480 35.84 1.50 14.75 10.70 2.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 112.4 MOU 78,153 5,498 14,071 1,877 23.70 1.50 13.50 6.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 92.4 MOA 34,571 567 0 2,603 12.14 0.00 1.25 4.30 2.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.0 03050102 Total 26,164 1,200 0 0 5.45 31.32 0.76 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 26,164 1,200 0 0 5.45 31.32 0.76 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03050103 Total 6,623 1,500 0 0 0.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.0 MOU 6,623 1,500 0 0 0.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.0 MOA 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 Chowan 11,128 1,700 0 6,086 97.30 0.00 0.00 15.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03010203 Total 8,310 1,700 0 3,300 85.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 8,310 1,700 0 3,300 85.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03010201 Total 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03010202 Total 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03010204 Total 2,818 0 0 2,786 12.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 2,818 0 0 2,786 12.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 French Broad 84,821 25,135 2,340 10,340 16.30 0.00 17.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 River Basin Cataloging Unit 1 of 4 Updated 9/ 30/ 07 Appendix B: Summary of EEP Gross Assets ( High Quality Preservation SItes are not listed in table below) Gross Assets Stream Restoration Stream Enhancment I Stream Enhancement II Stream Preservation Riparian Restoration Riparian Creation Riparian Enhancement Riparian Preservation Nonriparian Restoration Nonriparian Creation Nonriparian Enhancement Nonriparian Preservation Coastal Marsh Restoration Coastal Marsh Creation Coastal Marsh Enhancement Coastal Marsh Preservation Stream Buffer River Basin Cataloging Unit 06010105 Total 62,655 8,900 800 0 10.00 0.00 15.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 9,000 2,300 0 0 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 53,655 6,600 800 0 0.00 0.00 15.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 06010106 Total 4,857 0 0 715 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 4,857 0 0 715 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 06010108 Total 17,309 16,235 1,540 9,625 1.30 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 17,309 16,235 1,540 9,625 1.30 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 Hiwassee 1,876 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 06020002 Total 1,876 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 1,876 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 06020003 Total 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 Little Tennessee 6,627 1,082 1,490 1,101 58.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 06010202 Total 4,358 1,082 1,490 0 6.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 4,358 1,082 1,490 0 6.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 06010203 Total 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 06010204 Total 2,269 0 0 1,101 52.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 2,269 0 0 1,101 52.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 Lumber 8,282 0 0 1,750 30.00 0.25 30.44 35.80 670.08 0.00 0.00 301.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03040203 Total 0 0 0 0 25.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 590.08 0.00 0.00 300.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 0 0 0 0 25.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 590.08 0.00 0.00 300.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03040204 Total 5,000 0 0 0 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 5,000 0 0 0 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03040206 Total 3,282 0 0 1,750 0.00 0.25 0.44 35.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 3,282 0 0 1,750 0.00 0.25 0.44 35.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03040207 Total 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 80.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 80.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 Neuse 117,157 14,405 10,306 13,193 474.90 8.34 269.43 1,734.56 1,560.30 5.80 1,984.20 777.15 5.64 - 1.08 0.18 4.94 217.3 03020201 Total 82,005 7,882 8,671 9,793 87.06 8.34 66.82 241.05 98.80 4.90 0.00 20.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 124.1 MOU 38,733 7,882 8,671 6,100 37.16 4.00 64.00 135.53 1.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 117.5 MOA 43,273 0 0 3,693 49.90 4.34 2.82 105.52 97.20 4.90 0.00 20.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.6 03020202 Total 10,137 3,693 2,208 0 192.10 0.00 86.20 680.00 25.00 0.00 0.00 125.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.0 MOU 0 3,693 2,208 0 7.70 0.00 13.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.4 MOA 10,137 0 0 0 184.40 0.00 73.20 680.00 25.00 0.00 0.00 125.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 21.6 03020203 Total 14,440 2,830 0 0 110.84 0.00 10.43 429.21 30.00 0.90 0.40 147.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18.3 MOU 2,232 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.6 2 of 4 Updated 9/ 30/ 07 Appendix B: Summary of EEP Gross Assets ( High Quality Preservation SItes are not listed in table below) Gross Assets Stream Restoration Stream Enhancment I Stream Enhancement II Stream Preservation Riparian Restoration Riparian Creation Riparian Enhancement Riparian Preservation Nonriparian Restoration Nonriparian Creation Nonriparian Enhancement Nonriparian Preservation Coastal Marsh Restoration Coastal Marsh Creation Coastal Marsh Enhancement Coastal Marsh Preservation Stream Buffer River Basin Cataloging Unit MOA 12,208 2,830 0 0 110.84 0.00 10.43 429.21 30.00 0.90 0.40 147.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.7 03020204 Total 10,575 0 - 573 3,400 84.90 0.00 105.98 384.30 1,406.50 0.00 1,983.80 484.65 5.64 - 1.08 0.18 4.94 50.9 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 122.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 10,575 0 - 573 3,400 84.90 0.00 105.98 384.30 1,406.50 0.00 1,983.80 362.65 5.64 - 1.08 0.18 4.94 50.9 New 20,596 4,486 20,038 17,017 11.16 0.40 6.02 15.23 1.00 0.00 0.00 13.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 05050001 Total 20,596 4,486 20,038 17,017 11.16 0.40 6.02 15.23 1.00 0.00 0.00 13.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 3,230 1,692 20,038 16,204 2.36 0.00 4.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 17,366 2,794 0 813 8.80 0.40 1.50 15.23 1.00 0.00 0.00 13.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 Pasquotank 15,400 2,500 0 0 396.80 0.00 21.40 68.65 1,149.13 0.00 6.00 139.32 0.00 25.35 0.00 180.94 0.0 03010205 Total 15,400 2,500 0 0 396.80 0.00 21.40 68.65 1,149.13 0.00 6.00 139.32 0.00 25.35 0.00 180.94 0.0 MOU 1,000 0 0 0 5.66 0.00 0.60 19.00 41.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 14,400 2,500 0 0 391.14 0.00 20.80 49.65 1,107.63 0.00 6.00 139.32 0.00 25.35 0.00 180.94 0.0 Roanoke 46,821 2,087 8,499 13,263 154.00 0.00 0.00 576.43 239.00 0.00 8.00 3,457.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03010102 Total 0 0 5,000 12,300 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 0 0 5,000 12,300 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03010103 Total 13,850 855 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 3,850 855 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 10,000 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03010104 Total 12,720 1,232 3,499 463 89.00 0.00 0.00 19.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 12,720 1,232 3,499 463 89.00 0.00 0.00 19.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03010106 Total 5,000 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 5,000 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03010107 Total 15,251 0 0 500 65.00 0.00 0.00 557.43 239.00 0.00 8.00 3,457.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 15,251 0 0 500 65.00 0.00 0.00 557.43 239.00 0.00 8.00 3,457.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 Savannah 3,310 1,600 0 3,115 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03060101 Total 3,310 1,600 0 3,115 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 3,310 1,600 0 3,115 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03060102 Total 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 Tar- Pamlico 35,718 9,292 2,585 0 170.64 59.40 35.10 419.90 441.03 9.24 2.95 557.79 3.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 105.7 03020101 Total 12,615 2,137 210 0 13.70 2.80 4.50 10.30 47.40 0.00 0.70 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 37.7 MOU 3,361 2,137 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 31.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.0 MOA 9,254 0 210 0 13.70 2.80 4.50 10.30 15.70 0.00 0.70 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 29.7 03020102 Total 6,500 0 0 0 87.00 0.00 7.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 6,500 0 0 0 87.00 0.00 7.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03020103 Total 7,603 7,155 0 0 2.94 56.60 23.60 348.00 129.40 0.00 2.25 9.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 36.5 MOU 0 1,300 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.0 MOA 7,603 5,855 0 0 2.94 56.60 23.60 348.00 129.40 0.00 2.25 9.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.5 03020104 Total 9,000 0 2,375 0 51.00 0.00 0.00 61.60 244.23 9.24 0.00 548.57 3.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 31.5 MOU 9,000 0 0 0 20.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.6 MOA 0 0 2,375 0 31.00 0.00 0.00 61.60 244.23 9.24 0.00 548.57 3.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.9 3 of 4 Updated 9/ 30/ 07 Appendix B: Summary of EEP Gross Assets ( High Quality Preservation SItes are not listed in table below) Gross Assets Stream Restoration Stream Enhancment I Stream Enhancement II Stream Preservation Riparian Restoration Riparian Creation Riparian Enhancement Riparian Preservation Nonriparian Restoration Nonriparian Creation Nonriparian Enhancement Nonriparian Preservation Coastal Marsh Restoration Coastal Marsh Creation Coastal Marsh Enhancement Coastal Marsh Preservation Stream Buffer River Basin Cataloging Unit 03020105 Total 0 0 0 0 16.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 0 0 0 0 16.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 Watauga 5,117 279 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 06010103 Total 5,117 279 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 5,117 279 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 White Oak 27,839 0 931 2,010 39.25 0.00 3.80 3.90 383.00 0.00 52.00 110.50 5.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03030001 Total 18,240 0 931 0 14.65 0.00 2.00 0.00 53.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 8,022 0 376 0 3.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 10,218 0 555 0 11.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 38.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03020106 Total 9,599 0 0 2,010 24.60 0.00 1.80 3.90 329.90 0.00 52.00 110.50 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 250.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 9,599 0 0 2,010 21.60 0.00 1.80 3.90 79.90 0.00 52.00 110.50 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 Yadkin 198,564 22,932 27,850 51,221 201.59 154.12 47.07 79.30 18.87 0.00 21.09 8.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03040101 Total 59,378 8,612 3,576 2,376 58.95 21.82 2.91 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 48,428 7,112 2,576 0 3.05 1.62 2.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 10,950 1,500 1,000 2,376 55.90 20.20 0.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03040102 Total 29,661 0 0 0 31.24 130.30 14.80 5.50 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 29,661 0 0 0 31.24 130.30 14.80 5.50 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03040103 Total 35,164 7,700 3,094 24,105 26.00 2.00 11.12 2.00 4.00 0.00 7.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 35,164 7,700 3,094 24,105 26.00 2.00 11.12 2.00 4.00 0.00 7.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03040104 Total 6,618 0 2,900 3,200 42.40 0.00 0.94 6.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 6,618 0 2,900 3,200 42.40 0.00 0.94 6.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03040105 Total 51,039 5,850 16,280 11,980 0.30 0.00 7.90 9.00 14.87 0.00 10.09 8.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 7,135 3,180 1,190 0 0.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 43,904 2,670 15,090 11,980 0.30 0.00 5.90 7.00 14.87 0.00 10.09 8.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03040201 Total 16,704 770 2,000 9,560 42.70 0.00 9.40 55.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 2,000 0 0.00 0.00 2.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 16,704 770 0 9,560 42.70 0.00 6.90 55.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 03040202 Total 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 MOA 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 Grand Total 1,082,844 138,731 130,196 185,559 2,452.76 273.03 599.36 3,975.28 5,385.04 15.04 2,301.38 5,873.61 23.63 24.27 85.94 185.88 551.3 Grand Total MOU 330,884 57,980 68,554 49,411 264.93 8.62 157.99 383.68 347.73 0.00 96.46 209.76 5.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 268.7 Grand Total MOA 751,961 80,751 61,643 136,148 2,187.83 264.41 441.37 3,591.60 5,037.31 15.04 2,204.92 5,663.85 18.14 24.27 85.94 185.88 282.7 4 of 4 Updated 9/ 30/ 07 Appendix C: Net Remaining Asset Credits Stream Restoration Stream Restoration Equivalent Riparian Restoration Riparian Restoration Equivalent Nonriparian Restoration Nonriparian Restoration Equivalent Coastal Marsh Restoration Coastal Marsh Restoration Equivalent Broad 60,490 1,712.80 11.40 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 03050105 Total 60,490 1,713 11.40 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 658 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 59,832 1,713 11.40 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cape Fear 151,854 3,642 591.92 221.64 880.44 194.16 8.99 42.88 03030001 03030002 Total 22,708 1,352 50.59 8.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.45 4.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 22,707 1,352 50.14 4.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 03030003 Total 78,496 0 3.31 0.90 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 MOU 15,809 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 62,687 0 3.31 0.90 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 03030004 Total 36,642 2,170 129.76 68.15 10.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 3,797 0 43.68 1.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 32,845 2,170 86.08 66.43 10.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 03030005 Total 10,890 0 373.60 13.66 660.67 59.50 8.99 42.88 MOU 2,824 0 0.54 1.21 0.21 50.55 0.00 0.00 MOA 8,066 0 373.06 12.46 660.46 8.95 8.99 42.88 03030006 Total 1,673 120 8.93 13.40 160.02 1.09 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 1,673 120 8.93 13.40 160.02 1.09 0.00 0.00 03030007 Total 1,446 0 25.72 116.76 49.63 133.51 0.00 0.00 MOU 326 0 10.07 0.00 3.88 1.87 0.00 0.00 MOA 1,120 0 15.65 116.76 45.75 131.64 0.00 0.00 Catawba 37,448 39 13.50 1.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 03050101 Total 13,445 39 6.61 1.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 737 0 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 12,708 39 6.24 1.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 03050102 Total 23,803 0 6.89 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 23,803 0 6.89 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 03050103 Total 200 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 200 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Chowan 12,249 1,217 96.76 3.00 4.99 2.00 0.00 0.00 03010203 Total 9,443 660 84.46 3.00 4.99 2.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 9,443 660 84.46 3.00 4.99 2.00 0.00 0.00 03010201 Total 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 03010202 Total 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 03010204 Total 2,806 557 12.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 2,806 557 12.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 French Broad 76,632 2,048 10.75 8.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 06010105 Total 43,393 0 4.45 7.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 2.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 43,393 0 2.39 7.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 06010106 Total 4,491 123 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 4,491 123 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 06010108 Total 28,748 1,925 1.30 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 28,748 1,925 1.30 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hiwassee 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 06020002 Total 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 06020003 Total 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 River Basin Cataloging Unit Net Debited Asset Credits ( does not include outstanding permit requirements that have not yet been debited) 1 of 3 Updated 9/ 30/ 07 Appendix C: Net Remaining Asset Credits Stream Restoration Stream Restoration Equivalent Riparian Restoration Riparian Restoration Equivalent Nonriparian Restoration Nonriparian Restoration Equivalent Coastal Marsh Restoration Coastal Marsh Restoration Equivalent River Basin Cataloging Unit Net Debited Asset Credits ( does not include outstanding permit requirements that have not yet been debited) Little Tennessee 7,677 220 57.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 06010202 Total 5,407 0 5.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 5,407 0 5.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 06010203 Total 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 06010204 Total 2,269 220 52.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 2,269 220 52.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lumber 8,228 350 19.98 18.19 581.55 60.28 0.00 0.00 03040203 Total 0 0 15.06 11.50 524.32 60.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 0 0 15.06 11.50 524.32 60.00 0.00 0.00 03040204 Total 4,946 0 4.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 4,946 0 4.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 03040206 Total 3,282 350 0.06 6.69 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 3,282 350 0.06 6.69 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 03040207 Total 0 0 0.00 0.00 57.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 6.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 0 0 0.00 0.00 50.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 Neuse 34,709 680 409.86 446.65 1,491.55 1,118.52 5.28 1.08 03020201 Total 2,166 0 42.50 55.26 36.27 3.77 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 18.79 33.21 5.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 2,166 0 23.71 22.05 30.46 3.77 0.00 0.00 03020202 Total 8,464 0 178.55 171.71 24.62 25.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 8,464 0 178.55 171.71 24.62 25.00 0.00 0.00 03020203 Total 14,107 0 108.85 89.83 29.74 29.70 0.00 0.00 MOU 190 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 13,917 0 108.85 89.83 29.74 29.70 0.00 0.00 03020204 Total 9,972 680 79.96 129.85 1,400.92 1,060.05 5.28 1.08 MOU 0 0 0.09 0.00 2.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 9,972 680 79.87 129.85 1,398.26 1,060.05 5.28 1.08 New 24,053 3,198 9.41 6.06 1.00 2.68 0.00 0.00 05050001 Total 24,053 3,198 9.41 6.06 1.00 2.68 0.00 0.00 MOU 2,185 1,024 0.27 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 21,868 2,175 9.14 5.43 1.00 2.68 0.00 0.00 Pasquotank 15,578 0 394.18 21.72 1,133.86 30.76 3.13 35.67 03010205 Total 15,578 0 394.18 21.72 1,133.86 30.76 3.13 35.67 MOU 0 0 4.05 2.37 26.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 15,578 0 390.13 19.35 1,107.50 30.76 3.13 35.67 Roanoke 44,319 2,514 144.04 106.09 115.46 685.00 0.00 0.00 03010102 Total 1,961 2,421 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 1,961 2,421 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 03010103 Total 10,584 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 1,420 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 9,164 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 03010104 Total 14,941 93 88.08 3.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 14,941 93 88.08 3.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 03010106 Total 4,960 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 4,960 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 03010107 Total 11,873 0 55.96 102.54 115.46 685.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 11,873 0 55.96 102.54 115.46 685.00 0.00 0.00 Savannah 4,377 623 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.00 03060101 Total 4,377 623 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 4,377 623 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.00 2 of 3 Updated 9/ 30/ 07 Appendix C: Net Remaining Asset Credits Stream Restoration Stream Restoration Equivalent Riparian Restoration Riparian Restoration Equivalent Nonriparian Restoration Nonriparian Restoration Equivalent Coastal Marsh Restoration Coastal Marsh Restoration Equivalent River Basin Cataloging Unit Net Debited Asset Credits ( does not include outstanding permit requirements that have not yet been debited) 03060102 Total 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Tar- Pamlico 30,954 0 159.05 100.81 389.32 110.46 3.24 0.00 03020101 Total 12,836 0 7.09 3.63 16.80 0.37 0.00 0.00 MOU 3,199 0 0.00 0.00 1.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 9,637 0 7.09 3.63 15.44 0.37 0.00 0.00 03020102 Total 6,454 0 80.91 3.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 6,454 0 80.91 3.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 03020103 Total 10,214 0 21.43 81.36 119.33 2.73 0.00 0.00 MOU 1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 10,213 0 21.43 81.36 119.33 2.73 0.00 0.00 03020104 Total 1,450 0 33.90 12.32 237.20 107.36 3.24 0.00 MOU 512 0 2.94 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 938 0 30.96 12.32 236.88 107.36 3.24 0.00 03020105 Total 0 0 15.72 0.00 15.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 0 0 15.72 0.00 15.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 Watauga 2,722 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 06010103 Total 2,722 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOA 2,722 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 White Oak 21,001 401.98 22.72 2.68 86.90 48.10 3.21 0.00 03030001 Total 11,926 0 2.36 1.00 26.03 0.00 2.73 0.00 MOU 3,009 0 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.73 0.00 MOA 8,917 0 2.01 1.00 26.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 03020106 Total 9,074 402 20.36 1.68 60.87 48.10 0.48 0.00 MOU 0 0 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.00 MOA 9,074 402 19.70 1.68 60.87 48.10 0.18 0.00 Yadkin 137,120 7,892.20 224.87 31.22 14.51 10.73 0.00 0.00 03040101 Total 21,601 475 60.40 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOU |
OCLC number | 190863046 |