Executive Summary ………………………………………………………………….. i
………………………
……………………………………..
…………………………………………………....
…………………………………………………..
…………………………………………
………………………………………………..
……………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………….
……………………………………………………….
………………………………………………………………………..
…………………………….
……………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………….
……………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………..
…………………………………………………………………………...
……………………………………………………………………….
– ……………………………………………….
– …………………….
– ……………………………….
– …………………………………………………
– ……………………………………………
– …………………………………………………..
– ………………………………………..
– ………………………………………………………
– Additional Transportation Alternatives and Scenarios Studied ……... I
………………………………….
………………………………………….
……………………………………………
……………………………………………………
………………………………………………………...
………………
………………..
Marshall ………...
…………..
…………
…………..
………………………………………………..
………………………………………………….
……………………………………………
……………….
…………………………………..
……………………………………….
…………………………………………………
……………………………………
……………………………….
………………………………………………………….
…………………………………………………………
k
k
k
k
k
k
k
k
k
tu
$
tu
tu
tu
tu
tu
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
tu
tu
tu
tu
tu
$
$
$
$
tu
tu
tu
k
k
k
k
k
k
k
k
k
$ k
$
$
$
$
$
$
!(
!(
!.
!.
!.
!(
!. !(
tu tu
tu
tu
tu
$
tu
tu
$
$
$
$
$
tu
tu
tu
tu
!(
!(
!.
!.
!(
!(
k
k
$
!.
!.
!(
!(
tu
tu
$
!.
!.
!(
!(
k
$
$
!.
tu
tu
tu
tu
tu tu
!(
k
$
tu
tu
k
k
k
k
k
k
k
k
k
tu
$
tu
tu
tu
tu
tu
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
tu
tu
tu
tu
$
$
$
$
P
P
tu
tu
tu
#
**
%
,,,
tu
$
P
k
k
k
k
k
k
k
k
k
tu
$
tu
tu
tu
tu
tu
$ $
$
$
$
$
$
$
tu
tu
tu
tu
$
$
$
$
tu
tu
(
!(
k
k
k
k
k
k
k
k
k
tu
$
tu
tu
tu
tu
tu
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
tu
tu
tu
tu
tu
$
$
$
$
tu
tu
tu
(
!(
k
k
$
tu
$
tu
(
!(
tu
tu
tu
k
tu
$
tu
transportation system and its ability to serve the area’s travel desires. Emphasis is
–
the roadway’s
Capacity is the maximum number of vehicles which have a “reasonable expectation” of
“ actical capacity” of a roadway
k
k
k
k
k
k
k
k
k
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
tu
$
tu
tu
tu
tu
tu
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
tu
tu
tu
tu
tu
$
$
$
$
tu
tu
k
k
k
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
$
tu
$
tu
tu
tu
k
k
!
!
! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
$
tu
tu
$
tu
tu
tu
k
!
!
!
$
tu
tu
tu
k
k
k
k
k
k
k
k
k
k
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
tu
$
tu
tu
tu
tu
tu
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
tu
tu
tu
tu
tu
$
$
$
$
tu
tu
k
k
k
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
$
tu
tu
$
t
u
tu
k
k
!
!
! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
$
tu
tu
$
tu
tu
tu
k
!
!
!
$
tu
tu
k
k
k
k
k
k
k
k
k
k
tu
$
tu
tu
tu
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
tu
tu
tu
tu
$ $
$
tu
$
tu
tu
k
k
k
k
k
k
k
k
k
k
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
! !
!
! !
!
! !
! ! ! ! ! !
!
!
! !
! !
!
! ! !
! ! !
!
! !
!
! ! ! !
!
!
! ! ! !!
! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! !
! ! !
!
! !
! !
! !! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
! ! ! !
! !
!
!
! ! ! !
! ! !
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
tu
$
tu
tu
tu
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
tu
tu
tu
tu
$ $
$
tu
$
tu
tu
!
! ! !
!!
!!
!
!! !
! !
!
!
! ! ! !
!!! ! ! !!
!
!! ! ! !
!
! !
!!
! !
! ! !
!
! !
! ! !!
!
! !
! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
!
!
! !! !
!
!
! ! ! !
! !
! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! !
! ! ! ! ! !
!
! ! !
!
!
!
! ! !
! ! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
k
–
NCDOT’s Bicycle Policy, updated in 1991, cl
NCDOT’s administrative guidelines, adopted in 1994, ensure that greenways and
interested in developing a bicycle plan in conjunction with NCDOT’s Division of
Madison County primarily anticipates growth in areas designated as “Primary Growth
Areas”. These areas, as depicted in Figure 7, encompass residential, commercial and
ed “mixed use corridors” including I
“neighborhood/community centers” such as the Spring Creek Community, Wolf Laurel,
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
I-26
NC-63
NC-209
NC-212
NC-208
US-23
US-25&70
US-19&23
US-19
NC-251
NC-213
California Creek Rd
Old Marshall Hwy
Cascade St
BUS-'US-'25&BUS-70
Mashburn Hill Rd
Blaine Jarvis Rd
Walnut Dr
I-26
Current Zoning & Land Use November 2009
This map was produced by Assessor's, Land Records, & MPlaandnisionng CDoeupnatryt mGeISn,ts.
1 inch equals 2.5 miles
.
0 1 2 3 4 5Miles
Tanhids ims acopm isp pilreedp afrroemd froerc othrde eindv deenetodrsy, polfa rtes,a al npdro optehretyr pfouubnlidc rwecitohrind st hains dju driastdai.c tion, sUosuerrcse osf sthhoisu mlda bpe a croe nhseurletebdy fnoort vifeierdifi cthataito tnh oe fa tfhoer einmfoenrmtioantioedn pcounbtliaci nperidm oanry t hinisfo mrmapa.t i on cTohnet Caionuendt yo na nthdi sm mapappi.n g c o m p any assume no legal responsibility for the information
Zoning InformDaIStCioLnA IiMs EpRroposed only. This map is a draft and subject to change Madison County
Comprehensive Plan
Zoning
Industrial
Mobile Home Parks
Residential - Resort
Residential - Agricultural
Retail - Business
Vacant Parcels
Primary Roads
Floodway
City Limits
USFS
Land Fill
NC-63
NC-208
US-23
NC-209
SR#1304
US-25&70
NC-212
US-19&23
SR#1526
Revere Rd
US-19
Bruce Rd
M
eadow Fork Rd
NC-251
Grapevine Rd
SR#1370
SR#1510
SR#1631
SR#1127
Hamburg Rd
SR#1314
P ark Dr
Spillcorn Rd
Max Patch Rd
SR#1362
Up per Shutin Rd
SR#1448
Ivy Hill Rd
East Fork Rd
SR#1506
SR#1318
SR#1313
Paint Fork Rd
SR#1411
Fisher Ln
SR#1509
NC-213
SR#1116
SR#1345
Big Pine Rd
SR#1159
Bailey Br Rd
Bailey St
Meadowtown Rd
SR#1517
SR#1151
Beech Glen Rd
South Fork Rd
California Creek Rd
Marrow Rd
SR#1348
Trai
l
SR#1114
SR#1319
SR#1357
Barnard Rd
SR#1136
SR#1163
Cody Rd
Rock House Rd
Big Laurel
Meadows Town Road
Paw Paw Rd
Grandview Rd
SR#1367
SR#1395
SR#1126
Calvin Creek Rd
SR#1505
S Main St
SR#1349
SR#1157
SR#1124
SR#1307
SR#1500
SR#1182
SR#1397
Stackhouse Rd
Baltimore Branch Rd
Poplar Gap Rd
Beetree Rd
SR#1341
SR#1512
Luung Br Rd
L ittlecreek Rd
Kelly Hunter Rd
Smith Cr eek Rd
Wall Rd
SR#1364
SR#1315
SR#1171
SR#1316
SR#1107
Bear Creek Rd
SR#1514
Teague Rd
SR#1363
River Rd
SR#1565
Metcalf Creek Loop
Silver Mill Rd
SR#13 68
SR#1306
Doe Branch Rd
SR#1525
SR#1405
Old Marshall Hwy
SR#1530
Duckmill Rd
SR#1312
Lower Shutin Rd
SR#1559
Boyd Rd
Foster B ranch Rd
Hickeys Fork Rd
Silvers M ill Rd
Rice Cove Rd
Hazel Brook Ln
Garren Flo Gap Rd
SR#1135
Rudisill Rd
SR#1394
Old California Creek Rd
Long Ridge Rd
Burton Cove Rd
Caldwell Mountain Rd
SR#1563
SR#1105
SR#1118
SR#1330
Holcombe Branch Rd
Cutshall Town Road
SR#1549
Sugar Camp Rd
Thomas Br Rd
SR#1518
Walnut Ck Rd
SR#1112
SR#1576
SR#1347
Chapel Hill Rd
SR#1174
SR#1150
Echo Ln
Oak Grove Rd
Fowler Farm Rd
Sprinkle Cr Rd
N Main St
SR#1344
SR#1527
SR#1584
Ammons Branch Rd
SR#1371
Roaring Fork Rd
SR#1139
Caney Fork Rd
SR#1502
Paint Rock Rd
SR#1609
SR#1504
SR#1181
SR#1332
SR#1570
Eller Ford Rd
Rocky Branch Rd
SR#1384
Tweed Rd
Birch Branch Rd
Lisenbee Rd
SR#1186
SR#1561
SR#1428
BUS-'US-'25&BUS-70
SR#1100
Chandler Cove Rd
SR#1398
SR#1361
Jaruis Br Rd
Ivy Trl
SR#1205
SR#1175
SR#1562
Walnut Creek Dr
Old Mill Rd
Lamptown Mtn Rd
SR#1328
SR#1162
Henry Bradley Rd
Laurel Valley Rd
Turnpike Rd
Payne Rd
Higgins Br Rd
Redmond Rd
Upper Brush Creek Rd
Water Shed Rd
SR#1533
Cargile Branch Rd
SR#1329
SR#1001
Griffin Branc h Rd
SR#1592
Lewis Branch Rd
Snelson Rd
Sandy Mush Rd
Duggers Cv
West Rd
Hickory Flats Rd
Skyway Dr
SR#1325
Austin Branch Rd
Rector Corner Rd
SR#1387
SR#1522
SR#1369
Windswept Ridge Rd
Snowbird Rd
SR#1515
Metcalf Creek Loop Rd
SR#1132
SR#1375
SR#1414
SR#1166
SR#1412
Doug Cove Rd
McDevitt Rd
Waldroup Rd
Tillery Br Rd
Fisher Branch Rd
Big Laur el Rd
Old Rd
SR#1580
Wolf Laurel Rd
Fox Grare
Franklin Mtn Rd
SR#1153
Bear Branch Rd
Terry's Fork Rd
SR#1140
Lonesome Mtn Rd
SR#1113
Amos Creek Rd
Little Pine Rd
SR#1621
Thomas Rd
SR#1399
SR#1585
Secluded Valley Rd
Sharp Hollow
SR#1540
Bill Creek Rd
Halewood Rd
Rice Rd
SR#1161
Carl Eller Rd
Ponders Rd
SR#1432
SR#1511
SR#1604
Mc Lean Rd
Bull Creek Rd
SR#1454
Ivy River Rd
SR#1618
SR#1143
Flynn Branch Rd
Lance Ave
Millar Rd
SR#1200
SR#1198
SR#1535
Streets Gap Rd
Robinson Rd
US-23
US-25&70
NC-213
SR#1318
SR#1330
US-19
Paw Paw Rd
US-25&70
SR#1151
US-19
NC-213
US-25&70
SR#1135
SR#1319
SR#1182
Roaring Fork Rd
SR#1395
NC-209
SR#1345
US-25&70
SR#1318
SR#1559
SR#1505
Turnpike Rd
Trail
Little Pine Rd
US-25&70
US-19
NC-251
Paint Fork Rd
US-25&70
US-23
Big Laurel
SR#1502
SR#1318
SR#1182
SR#1151
US-23
Meadow Fork Rd
Little Pine Rd
Upper Shutin Rd
S R#1318
NC-209
SR#1151
NC-213
SR#1182
Bear Creek Rd
SR#1182
N
C-212
Trail
Roaring Fork Rd
Big Laurel
US-25&70
Big Laurel
NC-212
Madison County Proposed Future Land Use
μ
November 2009
Madison County
Comprehensive Plan
Map 16
Disclaimer
Zoning and Land Use Information is proposed only.
This map is a draft and subject to revision
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 0.25 6 6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5 9 9.5 10
Miles
Mars Hill ETJ
Primary Roads
Floodway
Towns
I-26
Subdivisions
Proposed Future Land Use
Neighborhood - Commercial
Resort
Business - Industry
Ivy Creek Watershed Intake
Ivy Creek Watershed Critical Area
Proposed 2 Mile R-1 Planning Districts
Mixed Use Commercial Corridors
Ivy Creek Watershed
Zoning
Mobile Home Park
Landfill
I-D Industrial
R-2 Resort - Residential
R-A Residential - Agricultural
R-B Retail - Business
Town of Marshall Comprehensive Land Use Plan 103
Map A-11: Existing Land Use
Town of Marshall Comprehensive Land Use Plan 27
Map 2-2: Future Land Development Concept Map
k
k
k
k
k
k
k
k
$ k
$
$
$
$
$
$
!(
!(
!.
!.
!.
!(
!. !(
tu tu
tu
tu
tu
$
tu
tu
tu
tu
$
$
$
$
$
tu
tu
k
k
k
k
k
k
k
k
k
k
#
#
#
#
# # #
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
!(
!(
!.
!.
!.
!(
!. !(
tu tu
tu
tu
tu
$
tu
tu
tu
tu
$
$
$
$
$
tu
tu
k
#
k
k
k
k
k
k
k
k
$ k
$
$
$
$
$
$
!(
!(
!.
!.
!.
!(
!. !(
tu tu
tu
tu
tu
$
tu
tu
tu
tu
$
$
$
$
$
tu
tu
k
obsolete by NCDOT’s Bridge Maintenance Unit.
own’s Comprehensive Land
oulevard on NCDOT’s
’ lanes.
designation is indentified in the County’s future land
’s
Based on North Carolina’s vision for mobility and connectivity, US
is designated as a boulevard in the NCDOT’s
On October 19, 2009, the Town of Marshall adopted the Town’s
–
own’s
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
– –
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
“Needs improvement”
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
– Locations where existing “Off Road” facilities and
“Multi use Paths” are p
– Locations where “Off Road” facilities and “Multi
Paths” are recommended to be p
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
– Locations where existing “Off Road” facilities and
“Multi use Paths” are physically separated from existing highways, railroads, or other
– Locations where “Off Road” facilities and “Multi
Paths” are recommended to be physically separated from existing or recommended
combined with a 4 digit unique numerical code followed by ‘ H’ for highway, ‘ T’ for public
transportation, ‘ R’ for rail, ‘ B’ for bicycle, ‘ M’ for multi or ‘ P’ for pedestrian modes. If
Also, upper case alphabetic characters (i.e. ‘A’, ‘B’, or ‘C’) are included after the numeric portion
Listed under ‘(ft)’ is the approximate width of the roadway from edge of
pavement to edge of pavement. Listed under ‘lanes’ is the total number of lanes, with the letter
‘D’ if the facility is divided.
level analysis. The ‘20 ’ is an
. The ’20 AADT with CTP’
The ’20
with CTP’ is shown in bold if it exceeds the proposed capacity, in
entry of ‘ADQ’ indicates the existing
nt’s “Complete Streets” policy that was adopted in July 2009. This guidance
multiple modes of travel. These “typical” cross sections should be use
2 A
2 B
2 C
TYPICAL HIGHWAY CROSS SECTIONS
WIDE PAVED SHOULDERS
POSTED SPEED = 35 MPH OR LESS
50’ MIN. RIGHT OF WAY
10' 10'
4'
P.S.
4'
P.S.
6' 6'
WIDE PAVED SHOULDERS
POSTED SPEED = 55 MPH
12' 12'
5'
P.S.
8'
5'
P.S.
8'
60’ MIN.
RIGHT OF WAY
2 LANES
WIDE PAVED SHOULDERS
POSTED SPEED = 45 MPH OR LESS
11' 11'
4'
P.S.
8'
4'
P.S.
8'
60’ MIN. .RIGHT OF WAY
2 D
90' RIGHT OF WAY
2 E
2 F
TYPICAL HIGHWAY CROSS SECTIONS
2 LANES
CLEAR ZONE CLEAR ZONE
6' - 16' 6' - 16'
10' - 20'
CLEAR ZONE
10' - 20'
CLEAR ZONE
SIDEWALK SIDEWALK
2' 5' 11' 11'
BUFFERS AND SIDEWALKS WITHOUT A ROADWAY DITCH
(20 MPH TO 45 MPH)
(TYPICALLY COASTAL AREA MANAGEMENT ACT COUNTIES)
4' P.S. 5' 2'
MIN. MIN.
4' P.S.
60' - 80’ RIGHT OF WAY
BIKE
LANE
BIKE
LANE
11' 5' 2' 10'
5'
10' 2' 5' 11'
5'
SIDEWALK SIDEWALK
CURB AND GUTTER
WITH BIKE LANES AND SIDEWALKS
60' RIGHT OF WAY
MIN. MIN.
MIN. MIN.
4' P.S 4' P.S
8' 11' 11' 8'
SIDEWALK PLACEMENT BEHIND A ROADWAY DITCH
5'
SIDEWALK SIDEWALK
MIN. MIN.
2' 5' 5' 5' 2'
11' 10'
5'
10' 2' 11'
5'
MIN. MIN.
MIN. MIN.
SIDEWALK PARKING PARKING SIDEWALK
CURB & GUTTER - PARKING ON EACH SIDE
8' 5' 5' 8' 2'
85' MIN. RIGHT OF WAY
11' 10'
5'
10' 2' 11'
5'
MIN.
MIN. MIN.
MIN. MIN.
MIN. MIN.
MIN.
SIDEWALK
SIDEWALK SIDEWALK
PARKING SIDEWALK
CURB & GUTTER - PARKING ON ONE SIDE
8' 5' 5' 2'
75' MIN. RIGHT OF WAY
RAISED MEDIAN WITH CURB & GUTTER
23' (17’- 6” MIN.)
MEDIAN
LANDSCAPED MEDIAN
IN ACCORDANCE
WITH POLICY
11'
BIKE
LANE
BIKE
LANE
10'
5'
2' 5' 11'
5'
5' 2' 10'
80 - 90' RIGHT OF WAY
TYPICAL HIGHWAY CROSS SECTIONS
2 LANES
2 G
2 H
2 I
BIKE
LANE
BIKE
LANE
BIKE
LANE
BIKE
LANE
SCHOOL BUS
8'
3 A
3 B
TYPICAL HIGHWAY CROSS SECTIONS
3 LANES
11' 14' 2' 10'
MIN. MIN.
5'
MIN. MIN.
10' 2' 14'
5'
SIDEWALK SIDEWALK
CURB & GUTTER WITH WIDE OUTSIDE LANES AND SIDEWALKS
80' MIN. RIGHT OF WAY
11' 11'
4'-5' 4'-5'
P.S. P.S.
11'
WIDE PAVED SHOULDERS
80’ MIN. RIGHT OF WAY
8'
SCHOOL BUS
4 A
4 B
4 C
TYPICAL HIGHWAY CROSS SECTIONS
4 LANES
12' 12' 12' 12'
DIVIDED WITH MEDIAN - NO CURB & GUTTER
PARTIAL CONTROL OF ACCESS
30' MIN. MEDIAN
150' MIN. RIGHT OF WAY
2'
6'
2'
P.S. P.S.
6'
8'
4’-5'
P.S.
8'
4'-5'
P.S.
4'
P.S.
12' 46' MIN. MEDIAN 12' 12' 12'
6'
12' 12'
6'
4'
P.S.
180’ MIN. RIGHT OF WAY (LIMITED CONTROL OF ACCESS)
250’- 300’ MIN. RIGHT OF WAY (FULL CONTROL OF ACCESS)
DIVIDED WITH MEDIAN
FULL OR LIMITED CONTROL OF ACCESS
4’-10' P.S. 4’ -10' P.S.
RAISED MEDIAN WITH WIDE OUTSIDE LANES AND SIDEWALKS
23' (17’-6 “ MIN.) 11' 14'
SIDEWALK SIDEWALK
10'
5'
MIN. MIN.
2' 14' 11'
5'
2' 10'
MIN. MIN.
110’ MIN. RIGHT OF WAY
LANDSCAPED MEDIAN
IN ACCORDANCE
WITH POLICY
110’ MIN. RIGHT OF WAY
SCHOOL BUS
4 E
5 A
4 D
BIKE
LANE
BIKE
LANE
BIKE
LANE
BIKE
LANE
TYPICAL HIGHWAY CROSS SECTIONS
4 LANES
5 LANES
RAISED MEDIAN - CURB & GUTTER WITH BIKE LANES AND SIDEWALKS
23' (17’-6” MIN.) MEDIAN 11' 11'
SIDEWALK SIDEWALK
10'
5'
2' 5' 11' 11'
5'
MIN.
MIN.
MIN.
MIN.
5' 2' 10'
GRASS MEDIAN WITH BIKE LANES AND SIDEWALKS
11'
6' 6'
11' 5' 2' 10'
5'
MIN.
MIN.
MIN.
MIN.
SIDEWALK SIDEWALK
120’ - 135’ RIGHT OF WAY
46' (30’ MIN.)
4'
P.S.
2' 5' 11' 11'
4'
P.S.
11' 11' 14' 2' 10'
5'
10' 2' 14' 11'
5'
MIN.
MIN.
MIN.
MIN.
SIDEWALK SIDEWALK
WIDE OUTSIDE LANES
100' MIN. RIGHT OF WAY
10'
5'
LANDSCAPED MEDIAN
IN ACCORDANCE
WITH POLICY
SCHOOL BUS
DIVIDED WITH GRASS MEDIAN
300' MIN. RIGHT OF WAY
46' MIN. MEDIAN
12' P.S. 12' P.S.
12'
14' 14'
12' 12'
12' P.S.
14' 12' 12' 12' 14'
12' P.S.
6 B
8 A
6 A
TYPICAL HIGHWAY CROSS SECTIONS
6 LANES
8 LANES
RAISED MEDIAN - CURB & GUTTER WITH SIDEWALKS
11'-12' 11'-12' 11'-12' 2' 10'
SIDEWALK SIDEWALK
10'
5'
MIN.
MIN. MIN.
MIN.
2' 11'-12' 11'-12' 11'-12'
5'
11'-12' 11'-12'
160' MIN.
23’ (17'- 6” MIN.)
MEDIAN
RAISED MEDIAN - CURB & GUTTER WITH WIDE OUTSIDE LANES AND SIDEWALKS
23' (17’-6” MIN.)MEDIAN 11'-12' 11'-12' 14' 2' 10'
SIDEWALK SIDEWALK
10'
5'
MIN.
MIN. MIN.
MIN.
150' MIN. RIGHT OF WAY
2' 14' 11'-12' 11'-12'
5'
LANDSCAPED MEDIAN
IN ACCORDANCE
WITH POLICY
LANDSCAPED MEDIAN
IN ACCORDANCE
WITH POLICY
M A
M B
TYPICAL MULTI - USE PATH
5' 5'
40' MIN. ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY
5' 5'
3' 2' 2' 3'
MULTI - USE PATH
ADJACENT TO RIGHT OF WAY OR SEPARATE PATHWAY
4' P.S
R/W
12'
TRAVEL
LANE
8'
CLEAR ZONE
RIGHT OF WAY LIMIT
FOR HIGHWAY
R/W
MINIMUM
RIGHT OF WAY LIMIT
FOR PLACEMENT
OF 5’ SIDEWALK
2'
BIKE
LANE
11'-12' 5'
TRAVEL
LANE
9.5' 5' 5'
25'
ADDITIONAL R/W
MAY BE REQUIRED
5'-6''
MULTI - USE PATH ADJACENT TO CURB AND GUTTER
2' 2'
service. LOS D indicates “practical capacity” of a roadway,
state’s
The “Total” column indicat
Wild’s Branch
environment and community character and supporting the county’s vision for future land
•
•
•
•
•
Broad Friday and the farmer’s markets and
6. What routes in Madison County do you most commonly use?
When inquired as to the most commonly used routes in Madison County, people responded
With local roads, but many major routes were mentioned repeatedly. The routes most
Mentioned in this question were as follows:
Route Name Number of responses
US 25/US 70 114
NC 213 80
I-26 60
NC 209 33
NC 63 26
US 19 13
Meadow Town Road (SR 1001) 9
Little Pine Road (SR 1135) 9
Meadow Fork Road (SR 1175) 9
Bailey Branch Road (SR 1001) 8
7. Are there any destinations in Madison County that you think are unnecessarily difficult
To access because of road congestion or lack of a direct route? Please explain.
Majority of the responders thinks that there’s no congestion problem in Madison County (50%).
Some responders mentioned traffic problem on US 25/US 70 due to the lack of left turn lane.
In regard to the most difficult destination to access because of lack of a direct route, Spring
Creek community is the destination that was mentioned the most by the responders (20%).
Hot Springs, Big Laurel community and Revere community are other destinations that were
Mentioned.
– –
6%
6%
8%
14%
8%
13%
24%
21%
Most Important
Congestion
Accidents
Bike/Ped
Bus/P&R
Special Needs
Development
Environment
Character
34%
20% 3%
5%
3%
30%
2% 3%
Least Important Goal
Congestion
Accidents
Bike/Ped
Bus/P&R
Special Needs
Development
Environment
Character
project versus the potential “environmental degradation and community disruption” that
BEGIN PROJECT
ALT. 1
END PROJECT
ALT. 1
BEGIN PROJECT
ALT. 2
BEGIN PROJECT
ALT. 3
END PROJECT
ALT. 2 & 3
LITTLE PINE RD
SR 1135
BIG PINE
RD
S
R 1151
SHARP HOLLOW RD.
SR 1145
LOWER BRUSH CREEK RD.
SR 1143
RECTOR BRANCH RD.
SR 1153
US
25-70
NC 209
WOOLY SHOT RD.
SR 1171
BARNARD RD.
SR 1151
SR
1125
SR
1114
SR 113
6
SR 1133
SR 1155
NC 63
LOUNG BRANCH CREEK RD.
SR 1144
BALTIMORE BRANCH RD.
SR 1151
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RR
SOUTH FORK RD.
SR 1159
NORTH FORK
SR 1158
/
0 5,000 10,000 20,000
Feet
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT BRANCH
FS-0513A
NEW CONNECTOR
FROM MARSHALL TO SPRING CREEK COMMUNITY
MADISON COUNTY
DIVISION 13
ALTERNATIVE 1 PROJECT LIMITS: EXISTING LOCATION
Text
ALTERNATIVE 1 PROJECT LIMITS: NEW LOCATION
ALTERNATIVE 2 PROJECT LIMITS: EXISTING LOCATION
ALTERNATIVE 3 PROJECT LIMITS: EXISTING LOCATION
ALTERNATIVE 3 PROJECT LIMITS: NEW LOCATION
ALTERNATIVES 2 & 3 PROJECT LIMITS: EXISTING LOCATION
