House Select Committee on the Certificate of Need Process and Related Hospital Issues : final report to the 2013 House of Representatives. - Page 15 |
Previous | 15 of 27 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
House Select Committee on Certificate of Need Process and Related Hospital Issues Page 15 Recommendation: 18. The Committee recommends the General Assembly should continue to support the NC AHEC residency program and the NC Office of Rural Health and Community Care Rural Health Loan Repayment Program. Finding: Health care costs in North Carolina continue to increase despite efforts by the State to control them. Most regulatory efforts, whether aimed at managing care or limiting the expansion of facilities and technology to a State determined level of need, end up simply shifting costs from one area to another that is more profitable. Lanier Cansler, Former Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services noted that if the State wants to seriously address the issues of affordability and sustainability of healthcare in the State "we must develop a vision of our healthcare delivery system and then every modification to law, reimbursement process, policy, must be focused on achieving that vision." Recommendation: 19. The General Assembly should study reform of the health care market and the health care delivery system in North Carolina to increase cost effectiveness and quality of care through the encouragement of market driven competition in the provision of health care services. Finding: A Certificate of Public Advantage (COPA) was issued by the State in 1995 as a condition of allowing the merger of Memorial Mission Hospital and St. Joseph's Hospital to go forward. The entity that emerged from the merger process is Mission Hospital, Inc., operated by Mission Health Systems, Inc. ("Mission"). The COPA agreement was required by the State to offset the anticompetitive effects of the merger on the Western North Carolina health care market. Since 1995, the COPA agreement has been modified twice. Mission has submitted the reports required under the statutes and has been determined to be in compliance with the terms of the COPA agreement. Nonetheless, hospitals, health care providers, and individuals continue to raise concerns about the increase in Mission's market power and whether the COPA agreement has been effective in balancing the anticompetitive effects of the merger. Further in-depth investigation into the economic impact of Mission's COPA on the health care market, especially in light of recent changes in the structure of the health care industry, may be necessary to resolve these issues and ensure the provision of low cost, high quality health care to the people in Western North Carolina. Recommendation: 20. The Committee recommends that the hospitals, health care providers, and interested individuals in the region make every effort to resolve their differences regarding the COPA prior to the end of the 2013 Session of the General Assembly. If a satisfactory resolution to the issues is not reached in that time, the Committee recommends that the General Assembly conduct a study of the economic impact of the COPA and the effectiveness of that agreement.
Object Description
Description
Title | House Select Committee on the Certificate of Need Process and Related Hospital Issues : final report to the 2013 House of Representatives. - Page 15 |
Full Text | House Select Committee on Certificate of Need Process and Related Hospital Issues Page 15 Recommendation: 18. The Committee recommends the General Assembly should continue to support the NC AHEC residency program and the NC Office of Rural Health and Community Care Rural Health Loan Repayment Program. Finding: Health care costs in North Carolina continue to increase despite efforts by the State to control them. Most regulatory efforts, whether aimed at managing care or limiting the expansion of facilities and technology to a State determined level of need, end up simply shifting costs from one area to another that is more profitable. Lanier Cansler, Former Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services noted that if the State wants to seriously address the issues of affordability and sustainability of healthcare in the State "we must develop a vision of our healthcare delivery system and then every modification to law, reimbursement process, policy, must be focused on achieving that vision." Recommendation: 19. The General Assembly should study reform of the health care market and the health care delivery system in North Carolina to increase cost effectiveness and quality of care through the encouragement of market driven competition in the provision of health care services. Finding: A Certificate of Public Advantage (COPA) was issued by the State in 1995 as a condition of allowing the merger of Memorial Mission Hospital and St. Joseph's Hospital to go forward. The entity that emerged from the merger process is Mission Hospital, Inc., operated by Mission Health Systems, Inc. ("Mission"). The COPA agreement was required by the State to offset the anticompetitive effects of the merger on the Western North Carolina health care market. Since 1995, the COPA agreement has been modified twice. Mission has submitted the reports required under the statutes and has been determined to be in compliance with the terms of the COPA agreement. Nonetheless, hospitals, health care providers, and individuals continue to raise concerns about the increase in Mission's market power and whether the COPA agreement has been effective in balancing the anticompetitive effects of the merger. Further in-depth investigation into the economic impact of Mission's COPA on the health care market, especially in light of recent changes in the structure of the health care industry, may be necessary to resolve these issues and ensure the provision of low cost, high quality health care to the people in Western North Carolina. Recommendation: 20. The Committee recommends that the hospitals, health care providers, and interested individuals in the region make every effort to resolve their differences regarding the COPA prior to the end of the 2013 Session of the General Assembly. If a satisfactory resolution to the issues is not reached in that time, the Committee recommends that the General Assembly conduct a study of the economic impact of the COPA and the effectiveness of that agreement. |