House Select Committee on the Certificate of Need Process and Related Hospital Issues : final report to the 2013 House of Representatives. - Page 12 |
Previous | 12 of 27 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
House Select Committee on Certificate of Need Process and Related Hospital Issues Page 12 6. The Committee recommends the General Assembly increase the monetary threshold for major medical equipment from seven hundred fifty thousand dollars to one and a half million dollars. Finding: The Committee heard from parties who had an approved Certificate of Need application and, due to a change in circumstances, encountered difficulty making alterations to its Certificate of Need. This need for alterations is only increased during difficult economic situations. The Committee finds that looking into methods by which a modification to an approved Certificate of Need application could be made is prudent. Recommendation: 7. The Committee recommends studying ways to make it easier and more efficient to modify or change an approved Certificate of Need, particularly in light of an applicant's change in financial situation, and under which instances this should apply. Finding: Pursuant to G.S. 131E-177, the Department of Health and Human Services is designated as the State Health Planning and Development Agency. The State Health Coordinating Council (SHCC) is responsible for directing the development of the annual State Medical Facilities Plan. The SHCC was established via executive order by the Governor and contains appointments from the Governor. The SHCC is subject to ethics guidelines also established via Governor executive order. The Committee received comment expressing a need for more transparency and accountability by the State Health Coordinating Council and its decisions affecting the development of the State Medical Facilities Plan. The Committee finds, while it is necessary for the State Health Coordinating Council members to have experience and expertise in the health care industry, there are concerns of member conflicts of interest, the potential for undue influence by a single individual, and public perception. The Committee finds that these concerns could be lessened by changing the current appointment process of members to the State Health Coordinating Council. Recommendations: 8. The Committee recommends a codification of the State Health Coordinating Council. The appointments to the Council should be divided amongst the legislative and executive branches. 9. Upon codification of the State Health Coordinating Council, the members should adhere to ethical standards and conflict of interest provisions set by the General Assembly. These ethical standards should strive to eliminate any appearance of undue influence.
Object Description
Description
Title | House Select Committee on the Certificate of Need Process and Related Hospital Issues : final report to the 2013 House of Representatives. - Page 12 |
Full Text | House Select Committee on Certificate of Need Process and Related Hospital Issues Page 12 6. The Committee recommends the General Assembly increase the monetary threshold for major medical equipment from seven hundred fifty thousand dollars to one and a half million dollars. Finding: The Committee heard from parties who had an approved Certificate of Need application and, due to a change in circumstances, encountered difficulty making alterations to its Certificate of Need. This need for alterations is only increased during difficult economic situations. The Committee finds that looking into methods by which a modification to an approved Certificate of Need application could be made is prudent. Recommendation: 7. The Committee recommends studying ways to make it easier and more efficient to modify or change an approved Certificate of Need, particularly in light of an applicant's change in financial situation, and under which instances this should apply. Finding: Pursuant to G.S. 131E-177, the Department of Health and Human Services is designated as the State Health Planning and Development Agency. The State Health Coordinating Council (SHCC) is responsible for directing the development of the annual State Medical Facilities Plan. The SHCC was established via executive order by the Governor and contains appointments from the Governor. The SHCC is subject to ethics guidelines also established via Governor executive order. The Committee received comment expressing a need for more transparency and accountability by the State Health Coordinating Council and its decisions affecting the development of the State Medical Facilities Plan. The Committee finds, while it is necessary for the State Health Coordinating Council members to have experience and expertise in the health care industry, there are concerns of member conflicts of interest, the potential for undue influence by a single individual, and public perception. The Committee finds that these concerns could be lessened by changing the current appointment process of members to the State Health Coordinating Council. Recommendations: 8. The Committee recommends a codification of the State Health Coordinating Council. The appointments to the Council should be divided amongst the legislative and executive branches. 9. Upon codification of the State Health Coordinating Council, the members should adhere to ethical standards and conflict of interest provisions set by the General Assembly. These ethical standards should strive to eliminate any appearance of undue influence. |