Report of student performance on the North Carolina competency standard |
Previous | 1 of 4 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
|
This page
All
|
Public Schools of North Carolina State Board of Education Department of Public Instruction Accountability Services/Test Development Section Raleigh NC 27601-2825 www.ncpublicschools.org/accountability/testing Reporting on the Classes of 2000 - 2008 Published March 2005 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard 2003-04 STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION HOWARD N. LEE Chairman Raleigh JANE P. NORWOOD Vice Chair Charlotte KATHY A. TAFT Greenville MICHELLE HOWARD-VITAL Wilmington EDGAR D. MURPHY Durham EVELYN B. MONROE West End MARIA T. PALMER Chapel Hill ROBERT “TOM” SPEED Boone WAYNE MCDEVITT Asheville JOHN TATE III Charlotte BEVERLY PERDUE Lieutenant Governor New Bern RICHARD MOORE State Treasurer Kittrell NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION Patricia N. Willoughby, State Superintendent 301 N. Wilmington Street :: Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2825 :: www.ncpublicschools.org In compliance with federal laws, N C Public Schools administers all state-operated educational programs, employment activities and admissions without discrimination because of race, religion, national or ethnic orgin, color, age, military service, disability, or gender, except where exemption is appropriate and allowed by law. Inquiries or complaints should be directed to: Dr. Elsie C. Leak, Associate Superintendent Office of Curriculum and School Reform Services 6307 Mail Services Center Raleigh, NC 27699-6307 Telephone (919) 807-3761; fax (919) 807-3767 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard 2003-04 March 2005 Public Schools of North Carolina State Board of Education Department of Public Education Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program Raleigh NC 27601-2825 www.ncpublicschools.org/accountability/testing Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Acknowledgments This report is the collaborative work of many individuals. The North Carolina Testing Program is conducted by the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction (NCDPI), Division of Accountability Services. Technical support services for the program are implemented in collaboration with the Center for Urban Affairs and Community Services at North Carolina State University under the Technical Outreach for Public Schools (TOPS) program. Mildred Bazemore, Chief of the North Carolina Test Development Section, and Charles Lanier, Educational Research and Evaluation Consultant in the North Carolina Test Development Section, directed the design of the report. Staff at TOPS conducted the required analyses and report production. At TOPS we thank Alissa Bernholc, Betty Marsh, Stephen Ward, Anthony Wells, and Karin Wolfe for assistance in creating tables and figures, verifying data accuracy, and coordinating report editing and production. At DPI, we thank Mildred Bazemore and Charles Lanier for assistance in preparing all phases of this publication. We also thank the personnel in the state’s Regional Accountability Centers and Local Education Agencies for their conscientious efforts in administering the tests and verifying the data. This publication and the information contained within must not be used for personal or financial gain. North Carolina LEA school officials and teachers, parents, and students may download and duplicate this publication for instructional and educational purposes only. Others may not duplicate this publication without prior written permission from the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction (NCDPI) Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. © 2005 All rights reserved. This document may not be reproduced by any means, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction, Division of Accountability Services, North Carolina Test Development Section, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27601-2825. Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Summary Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Historical Background • North Carolina’s belief that all children can learn is consistent with the requirement that all students must be provided academic challenges in order to ensure that every child has an opportunity to realize his or her potential. Consistent with this belief has been an assessment requirement to measure what students know and are able to do as graduates of North Carolina public schools. To assure that students possess the knowledge and skills necessary to function independently and successfully in assuming the responsibilities of citizenship, North Carolina has required students to meet a graduation testing standard since 1978 for the class of 1981. Initially the competency testing program focused on competencies that students need to possess as a minimum in the areas of reading, mathematics, and grammar in order to graduate from high school. In 1985-86, the program was expanded to include a minimum skills writing component which was eliminated 1988-89. Effective with the graduates of 1998, students were expected to meet a higher standard in reading and mathematics. The results in this report focus on student performance on the higher standard. • Note: The State Board of Education approved revisions to the North Carolina Mathematics Standard Course of Study at the May 1998 monthly meeting. Effective with the 2000-01 school year, North Carolina mathematics tests measure the goals and objectives from the 1998 curriculum. Prior to the 1998 revision, the state mathematics curriculum had been revised in 1989 (grades K-8) and 1992 (grades 9-12). Due to the 1998 revisions in the mathematics curriculum and the revised tests, the mathematics developmental scale scores were revised for the grade 3 pretest and end-of-grade tests. The revised mathematics developmental scale scores adopted by the State Board of Education in September 2001 are used to report student performance in this publication beginning with 2000-01 data. Any mathematics scales reported prior to the 2000-01 school year are not to be compared without using the conversion tables published September 2001. The end-of-course mathematics tests (Algebra I, Algebra II, and Geometry) retained the scale previously used. Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Background • The class of 1998 was the first class required by State Board of Education policy to meet a higher competency standard in the areas of reading and mathematics in order to receive a high school diploma. The students graduating at the end of the 1997-98 school year were required to demonstrate grade-level proficiency (Achievement Level III or IV) on the eighth-grade reading and mathematics tests, the competency tests, or other approved screens. • Data used to compile this report were provided by the LEAs from the Student Information Management System (SIMS) and Masterbuild data files. The data files were generated using test results from students up to July 15, 2004. Key Findings • The percentage of students passing the competency standard increases with each grade although the number of students in membership generally decreases as students progress through the grades. Of eighth-graders, 77.8 percent passed the standard in the 2003-04 school year, while 78.1 percent of ninth graders, 86.1 percent of tenth graders, 91.4 percent of eleventh graders, and 94.1 percent of twelfth-graders met the requirement. • There are fewer differences in percent passing by ethnicity at grade 12 with better than 88.6 percent of all subgroups passing. At the end of grade 8, however, students in the Hispanic, Black, and American Indian subgroups pass at a lower rate than students in the White, Asian, and Multi-Racial subgroups. This pattern holds for the classes of 2006 and 2007 with between 30.9 percent and 51.3 percent of Hispanic, Black, and American Indian students not passing the competency standard by the end of grade 9. Report of Student Performance on the Competency Standard, 2003-04 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Table of Contents Introduction.....................................................................................................................i Background and Findings ................................................................................................ii Statewide Number of Students Tested and Number Not Tested by Grade......................1 Percent Passing by Class..................................................................................................6 Percent Passing by Ethnicity and Class ...........................................................................10 Performance of Exceptional, Limited English Proficient, and Title I Students, Across Grades 8-12........................................................................................................ 15 Performance of Students with Disabilities, Grades 8-12 ............................................... 16 Performance of Limited English Proficient Students, Grades 8-12............................... 19 Percent of LEAs and Charter Schools in Each Percent Passing Category by Class...... 20 Student Performance by Class, Ethnicity, and Gender, by LEA and Region................ 37 Sample Questions for the North Carolina Competency Tests ....................................... 101 Answers to Sample Tests and Notes.............................................................................. 109 Appendix....................................................................................................................... 111 List of North Carolina Charter Schools, 2003-04..................................................... 113 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Introduction The Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard provides information on student performance at the state, regional, and school system levels for students in the classes of 2000-2008. The data used to compile this report were provided by each LEA represented and are managed at the school and school system levels. The data were collected using a variety of strategies including analyzing electronically scored data files and reviewing masterbuild files. LEA test coordinators submitted the data from each LEA for this report to the NCDPI, and Regional Accountability Coordinators approved the data represented in this report. The requirement for graduates of 1998 or beyond represents a more rigorous standard than the minimum competency requirement implemented initially in 1978 for the class of 1981. The more recent standard implemented by the State Board of Education in 1995 requires students to demonstrate mastery of grade-level competencies in reading and mathematics equivalent to grade 8 as described in the North Carolina Standard Course of Study. In order to demonstrate the requirement, a student must achieve performance equivalent to Achievement Level III or above beginning with the North Carolina End-of- Grade Tests in Reading and Mathematics administered at the end of grade 8 and a State Board of Education alternative (screen). Students who fail the initial screen at grade 8 must be given at least one opportunity to pass the test(s) beginning as early as the summer after grade 8 and each year thereafter until the standard is met. LEAs are permitted to administer the competency tests in the summer, fall, and spring of each year (and during the last month of school for seniors only). Students are required to retake only the tests they do not pass. According to legislation and State Board of Education policy, any students who fail to pass the competency standard by the end of the ninth grade are given focused remedial instruction and additional opportunities to take the test(s) up to and including the last month of the twelfth grade. In addition, students who have failed to pass the competency standard by the end of the last school month of the year in which the students’ class graduates, may receive additional remedial instruction and continue to take the competency tests during regularly scheduled testing sessions until the students reach maximum school age (21). The purpose of this document is to report the performance of students in the classes of 2000-2008 on the more rigorous competency standard as of the 2003-04 school year. Previously published Reports of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard displayed LEA level data in the pie chart series in this report; beginning in 2002-03, charter school data are also included. A PDF version of this report is available at http://www.ncpublicschools.org/accountability/testing/reports. i Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Background and Findings Background • North Carolina General Statute 115C-174.11 mandates that the State Board of Education adopt tests or other measurement instruments which may be used to assure that graduates of the public high schools, and graduates of non-public high schools supervised by the State Board of Education, possess the skills and knowledge necessary to function independently and successfully in assuming the responsibilities of citizenship. Graduation Proficiency Guidelines • At its February 1995 meeting, the State Board of Education approved Grade-Level Proficiency Guidelines and Graduation Proficiency Guidelines that include replacing the less stringent 1978 North Carolina competency standard with more rigorous standards in reading and mathematics as measured by North Carolina End-of-Grade (EOG) Tests. The Current Standard • Beginning in 1994-95 with ninth graders, the higher standard requires students to demonstrate grade eight proficiency by performing at Achievement Level III or above on the reading and mathematics competency tests in order to receive a North Carolina high school diploma. Competency Requirement Guidelines • The competency requirement guidelines, as indicated in SBE policies HSP-C-016 and HSP-N-000, were revised in 1999. These policies include establishing Achievement Level III or above as the standard for grades 3 through 8, and “grade-level standards at the end of the year” for grades K through 2, respectively. Furthermore, intervention/remediation is required for students not meeting the standard. Regulations Governing the Competency Tests • Regulations concerning the competency requirement have not changed although the tests have been replaced effective with the class of 1998. With regard to the competency requirements, LEAs are legally required to: • test students beginning no later than grade 9, (which was changed from grade 10), effective with the passage of Senate Bill 1125 for the 1997-98 school year; • offer remedial instructional opportunities to students not meeting the requirement; • provide additional opportunities for students to retake the tests at least one time, up to three times, per year; and, • provide seniors with an additional opportunity to retake the tests during the last month of school. ii Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Cut Scores for the Competency Tests • The Achievement Level III or above standard requires a student to take the grade 8 end-of-grade tests in reading and mathematics or equivalent tests given as competency tests at the high school level. • The Achievement Level III performance on the 2003-04 EOG reading tests is scale scores at or above 254. • The Achievement Level III performance on the 2003-04 EOG mathematics tests is scale scores at or above 261. • No standard error of the mean is considered when determining whether students meet the competency standard for reading or mathematics. • The mathematics operational test was implemented in 2000-01; therefore, the mathematics cutoff scores for students who entered the eighth grade in 2000-01 were revised. Similarly, the reading cutoff scores were revised for students who entered the eighth grade in 2003-04. • The cutoff scores for students who entered the eighth grade in 1993-94 through 1999-00 are: Reading: at or above a scale score of 156, Mathematics: at or above a scale score of 165. • The cutoff scores for students who entered the eighth grade in 2000-01 are: Reading: at or above a scale score of 156, Mathematics: at or above a scale score of 256. • The cutoff scores for students who entered the eighth grade in 2001-02 are: Reading: at or above a scale score of 156, Mathematics: at or above a scale score of 261. • The cutoff scores for students who entered the eighth grade in 2002-03 are: Reading: at or above a scale score of 254, Mathematics: at or above a scale score of 261. iii Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Cut Scores for the Competency Tests (continued) • The cutoff scores for students who entered the eighth grade in 2003-04 are: Reading: at or above a scale score of 254, Mathematics: at or above a scale score of 261. Test Administrations • Students who do not achieve the above scores have not met the competency standard. • LEAs may schedule as many as three test administrations each school year: once in the summer, once in the fall (must accommodate seniors graduating in December), and once in the spring (must accommodate seniors). • LEAs may schedule up to four test administrations per year for seniors: summer prior to grade 12, fall, spring, and last month. • Each student who has failed to meet the requirement must be given at least one opportunity each year (beginning in grade nine) to retake the test(s) though LEAs may elect to give students an opportunity to retake the tests during each cycle. • Accommodations are available for students with disabilities or students who are identified as limited English proficient. • Different equivalent forms of the tests are rotated for each of the scheduled test administrations. Screening on Other Measures to Permit Students to Satisfy the Competency Standard • If a student has scores from the grade 8 North Carolina EOG reading comprehension and mathematics tests, the scores must be used to determine whether the student has met the competency requirements. If for some reason a student does not have such scores, other screening(s) may occur. The screenings described below are approved to be used for students who transfer into the North Carolina system after grade 8. Nationally- Normed Tests • Scores from a standardized, nationally-normed test, normed on a sample representative of the public school population in 1992 or later, may be used for competency screening. Scores from grade 8 or higher are preferred. The cut scores for screening for these tests are: • Reading or verbal: at or above the 50th national percentile. • Mathematics or quantitative: at or above the 50th national percentile. iv Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 PSAT or SAT • The following PSAT or SAT scores may be used for competency screening: o Reading or verbal: at or above a verbal score of 40 on the PSAT, 400 on the SAT (48 and 480 on the recentered scale). o Mathematics or quantitative: at or above a mathematics score of 45 on the PSAT and 450 on the SAT (48 and 480 on the recentered scale). Seventh Grade End-of-Grade Tests • In the event that North Carolina EOG scores, scores from nationally-normed tests, and scores from the PSAT or SAT are not available, seventh-grade EOG scores may, as a last resort, be used for screening purposes. Acceptable scores are the same as for grade 8. • The cut scores for students who entered the eighth grade in 1993-94 through 1999-00 are: Reading: at or above a scale score of 156, Mathematics: at or above a scale score of 165. • The cut scores for students who entered the eighth grade in 2000-01 are: Reading: at or above a scale score of 156, Mathematics: at or above a scale score of 256. • The cut scores for students who entered the eighth grade in 2001-02 are: Reading: at or above a scale score of 156, Mathematics: at or above a scale score of 261. • The cut scores for students who entered the eighth grade in 2002-03 are: Reading: at or above a scale score of 254, Mathematics: at or above a scale score of 261. • The cut scores for students who entered the eighth grade in 2003-04 are: Reading: at or above a scale score of 254, Mathematics: at or above a scale score of 261. v Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Strategies and Interventions Implemented to Increase Performance • The North Carolina Department of Public Instruction (NCDPI) has provided a North Carolina Competency Resource Guide that provides information to educators working to provide remedial instruction to students who have failed the tests. • Competency student handbooks have been provided to LEAs for students to use to get an understanding of what the tests are like and to provide information about the requirement. • Resources such as sample items and test information sheets and training on how to use the competency resource guidebook have been made available to LEAs. • Sample grade 8 reading and mathematics test items are available on the NCDPI/Testing Program website: www.ncpublicschools.org/accountability/testing/eog Data Verification • The LEAs provided the NCDPI with a pass/fail flag for each student enrolled by submitting a “masterbuild” file in the spring of 2004. LEAs exclude visiting, transfer, and foreign-exchange students based on an NCDPI directive. Data Sources • Since data became available for the 2000-01 school year, some required reporting variables were added by merging the “masterbuild” file with other testing files where the required variables had been collected. For 2003-04, the merge included grade 8 end-of-grade data from 2000-01 through 2003-04 and all end-of-course files from 2000-01 through 2003-04. Information from the other testing files was only applied to a student record when the student’s last name, identification number, and gender were identical; therefore, information was not obtained for students where name or identification number changed or was miscoded. Also, duplicates, when found, were removed to reflect the most recent complete data. State Results by Ethnicity for Eighth Grade • The eighth grade end-of-grade tests in reading and mathematics provide the first opportunity for students to meet the competency requirement. During the 2003-04 school year, 77.8 percent of eighth-grade students in North Carolina met the standard. • Results by ethnicity for eighth graders varied with the White student subgroup having the highest percent of students passing and the Hispanic student subgroup having the lowest percent of students passing. The percents passing for each subgroup were: 59.0 percent Hispanic, 63.0 percent Black, 71.7 percent American Indian, 81.5 percent Multi-Racial, 83.8 percent Asian, and 86.9 vi Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 percent White. State Results by Ethnicity for Ninth Grade • Students who have not met the eighth-grade proficiency or screen are required to take the North Carolina Competency Test of Reading and Mathematics as one requirement for a North Carolina high school diploma. According to legislation, all students who have not achieved a passing score must be provided the opportunity to take the competency tests in the ninth grade. In 2003-04, 78.1 percent of the students passed the competency requirement by the end of the ninth grade. Results by ethnicity varied with Hispanic students having the lowest percent passing and White students have the highest percent passing by the end of the ninth grade. • Approximately 52.9 percent Hispanic, 65.2 percent Black, 69.1 percent American Indian, 79.8 percent Asian, 81.7 percent Multi- Racial, and 87.6 percent White students passed the competency requirement by the end of the ninth grade. State Results by Ethnicity for Tenth Grade • During the 2003-04 school year, approximately 86.1 percent of the students passed the requirement by the end of the tenth grade. • When viewing the results by ethnic group, a difference continues to exist among the subgroups. The percents passing for each subgroup by the end of tenth grade were: 66.8 percent Hispanic, 76.2 percent Black, 79.6 percent American Indian, 83.4 percent Asian students, 86.9 percent Multi-Racial, and 92.4 percent White. State Results by Ethnicity for Eleventh Grade • For the 2003-04 school year, approximately 91.4 percent of students passed the competency standard by the end of eleventh grade. The largest difference exists between the Hispanic subgroup and the White subgroup. Approximately 79.1 percent of Hispanic students passed the requirement while 94.9 percent of White students passed the requirement by the end of the eleventh grade. • The percents passing for each subgroup were: 79.1 percent Hispanic, 85.4 percent Black, 87.0 percent Asian, 89.8 percent American Indian, 89.1 percent Multi-Racial, and 94.9 percent White. State Results by Ethnicity for Twelfth Grade • For the 2003-04 school year, approximately 94.1 percent of students passed the competency tests in twelfth grade. Results by ethnicity varied with Hispanic and Black students having the lowest percents passing and White students having the highest percent passing by the end of the twelfth grade. vii Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 State Reslults by Ethnicity for Twelfth Grade (continued) Performance of Students with Disabilities Performance of Students Identified as Limited English Proficient • The percents passing for each subgroup were: 88.6 percent Hispanic, 89.7 percent Black, 93.1 percent Asian, 93.1 percent American Indian, 94.5 percent Multi-Racial, and greater than or equal to 95.0 percent White. • For the 2003-04 school year, 41.4 percent of the 16,982 eighth-grade students with disabilities (including students identified only under Section 504) met the competency standard. Also for students with disabilities, 54.1 percent of 13,291 ninth-grade students, 55.7 percent of 11,373 tenth-grade students, 76.9 percent of 6,313 eleventh-grade students, and 69.3 percent of 6,784 twelfth-grade students passed. • For students identified as limited English proficient, 37.5 percent of 3,265 students in grade 8 met the competency standard in 2003-04. For the other grades, 68.1 percent of 2,406 students at grade 9; 46.2 percent of 2,132 students at grade 10; 56.6 percent of 244 students at grade 11; and 80.4 percent of 1,188 students at grade 12, met the competency standard in 2003-04. viii Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Membership1 N Tested2 % Tested % Proficient All Students 109,466 105,355 96.2 77.8 4,111 3.8 Female 53,284 51,717 97.1 80.6 1,567 2.9 Male 56,182 53,638 95.5 75.1 2,544 4.5 American Indian 1,550 1,464 94.5 71.7 86 5.5 Asian 2,118 1,998 94.3 83.8 120 5.7 Black 33,075 31,653 95.7 63.0 1,422 4.3 Hispanic 6,080 5,335 87.7 59.0 745 12.3 Multi-Racial 1,879 1,803 96.0 81.5 76 4.0 White 64,764 63,102 97.4 86.9 1,662 2.6 Title I 21,359 20,191 94.5 69.3 1,168 5.5 Schoolwide Title I 20,102 19,005 94.5 70.1 1,097 5.5 Targeted Assistance Title I 1,049 1,015 96.8 56.7 34 3.2 Not Title I 88,046 85,141 96.7 79.8 2,905 3.3 Migrant 688 604 87.8 60.6 84 12.2 Not Migrant 108,717 104,728 96.3 77.9 3,989 3.7 Free/Reduced Lunch 44,413 42,486 95.7 64.7 1,927 4.3 Not Free/Reduced Lunch 65,053 62,869 96.6 86.7 2,184 3.4 Limited English Proficient 3,265 2,576 78.9 37.5 689 21.1 Not Limited English Proficient 106,201 102,779 96.8 79.0 3,422 3.2 Students With Disabilities 16,982 15,004 88.4 41.4 1,978 11.6 Students Without Disabilities 92,484 90,351 97.7 84.4 2,133 2.3 Students With IEPs 14,996 13,031 86.9 37.2 1,965 13.1 Students Without IEPs 94,470 92,324 97.7 84.2 2,146 2.3 Behaviorally-Emotionally Disabled 1,382 1,251 90.5 27.4 131 9.5 Hearing Impaired 122 107 87.7 47.5 15 12.3 Educable Mentally Disabled 2,657 1,961 73.8 <=5% 696 26.2 Specific Learning Disabled 7,297 7,014 96.1 50.9 283 3.9 Speech-Language Impaired 195 190 97.4 55.9 5 2.6 Visually Impaired 56 49 87.5 62.5 7 12.5 Other Health Impaired 2,368 2,196 92.7 44.7 172 7.3 Orthopedically Impaired 62 46 74.2 45.2 16 25.8 Traumatic Brain Injury 67 52 77.6 34.3 15 22.4 Autistic 316 129 40.8 22.8 187 59.2 Severely/Profoundly Mentally Disabled 62 3 4.8 * 59 95.2 Multihandicapped 124 12 9.7 * 112 90.3 Deaf-Blind 19 12 63.2 47.4 7 36.8 Trainable Mentally Disabled 269 9 3.3 * 260 96.7 Section 504 1,986 1,973 99.3 73.3 13 0.7 Notes: 1"Membership" is the total number of students on the 2003-04 Masterbuild data file. *Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. These data represent coding on the 2003-04 test documents. % Absent/ Other 2"N Tested" represents the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Table 1. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Statewide Number of Students Tested and Number Not Tested, Grade 8 Category Not Tested N Absent/ Other 1 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Membership1 N Tested2 % Tested % Proficient All Students 119,403 111,982 93.8 78.1 7,421 6.2 Female 57,796 54,708 94.7 81.3 3,088 5.3 Male 61,607 57,274 93.0 75.0 4,333 7.0 American Indian 1,816 1,668 91.9 69.1 148 8.1 Asian 2,324 2,132 91.7 79.8 192 8.3 Black 37,228 34,263 92.0 65.2 2,965 8.0 Hispanic 7,053 5,795 82.2 52.9 1,258 17.8 Multi-Racial 1,829 1,703 93.1 81.7 126 6.9 White 69,153 66,421 96.0 87.6 2,732 4.0 Title I 1,426 1,270 89.1 50.4 156 10.9 Schoolwide Title I 879 779 88.6 55.2 100 11.4 Targeted Assistance Title I 353 315 89.2 42.8 38 10.8 Not Title I 109,098 104,806 96.1 82.4 4,292 3.9 Migrant 210 192 91.4 44.3 18 8.6 Not Migrant 110,314 105,884 96.0 82.1 4,430 4.0 Free/Reduced Lunch** Not Free/Reduced Lunch** Limited English Proficient 2,406 2,188 90.9 68.1 218 9.1 Not Limited English Proficient 116,997 109,794 93.8 78.3 7,203 6.2 Students With Disabilities 13,291 12,439 93.6 54.1 852 6.4 Students Without Disabilities 106,112 99,543 93.8 81.0 6,569 6.2 Students With IEPs 11,750 10,929 93.0 50.3 821 7.0 Students Without IEPs 107,653 101,053 93.9 81.1 6,600 6.1 Behaviorally-Emotionally Disabled 1,254 1,111 88.6 35.9 143 11.4 Hearing Impaired 111 106 95.5 58.6 5 4.5 Educable Mentally Disabled 1,048 867 82.7 12.9 181 17.3 Specific Learning Disabled 6,886 6,600 95.8 56.8 286 4.2 Speech-Language Impaired 115 107 93.0 53.9 8 7.0 Visually Impaired 62 58 93.5 69.4 4 6.5 Other Health Impaired 1,914 1,808 94.5 56.8 106 5.5 Orthopedically Impaired 40 38 95.0 62.5 2 5.0 Traumatic Brain Injury 40 37 92.5 40.0 3 7.5 Autistic 118 87 73.7 54.2 31 26.3 Severely/Profoundly Mentally Disabled 13 2 15.4 * 11 84.6 Multihandicapped 17 8 47.1 11.8 9 52.9 Deaf-Blind 101 94 93.1 44.6 7 6.9 Trainable Mentally Disabled 31 6 19.4 16.1 25 80.6 Section 504 1,541 1,510 98.0 83.4 31 2.0 Notes: 1"Membership" is the total number of students on the 2003-04 Masterbuild data file. *Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. **Free/ Reduced Lunch information is not collected for grades 9 and 11. These data represent coding on the 2003-04 test documents. % Absent/ Other 2"N Tested" represents the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Table 2. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Statewide Number of Students Tested and Number Not Tested, Grade 9 Category Not Tested N Absent/ Other 2 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Membership1 N Tested2 % Tested % Proficient All Students 97,211 92,214 94.9 86.1 4,997 5.1 Female 48,666 46,440 95.4 88.0 2,226 4.6 Male 48,545 45,774 94.3 84.2 2,771 5.7 American Indian 1,283 1,202 93.7 79.6 81 6.3 Asian 2,041 1,886 92.4 83.4 155 7.6 Black 28,103 25,976 92.4 76.2 2,127 7.6 Hispanic 4,482 3,985 88.9 66.8 497 11.1 Multi-Racial 1,339 1,253 93.6 86.9 86 6.4 White 59,963 57,912 96.6 92.4 2,051 3.4 Title I 961 816 84.9 59.8 145 15.1 Schoolwide Title I 634 520 82.0 60.7 114 18.0 Targeted Assistance Title I 192 172 89.6 62.5 20 10.4 Not Title I 94,546 89,988 95.2 86.8 4,558 4.8 Migrant 141 130 92.2 52.5 11 7.8 Not Migrant 95,366 90,674 95.1 86.6 4,692 4.9 Free/Reduced Lunch 26,982 25,092 93.0 77.2 1,890 7.0 Not Free/Reduced Lunch 70,229 67,122 95.6 89.5 3,107 4.4 Limited English Proficient 2,132 1,853 86.9 46.2 279 13.1 Not Limited English Proficient 95,079 90,361 95.0 87.0 4,718 5.0 Students With Disabilities 11,373 9,533 83.8 55.7 1,840 16.2 Students Without Disabilities 85,838 82,681 96.3 90.1 3,157 3.7 Students With IEPs 9,982 8,164 81.8 51.3 1,818 18.2 Students Without IEPs 87,229 84,050 96.4 90.1 3,179 3.6 Behaviorally-Emotionally Disabled 753 636 84.5 44.1 117 15.5 Hearing Impaired 128 106 82.8 53.1 22 17.2 Educable Mentally Disabled 1,596 826 51.8 7.6 770 48.2 Specific Learning Disabled 5,433 5,090 93.7 65.3 343 6.3 Speech-Language Impaired 82 75 91.5 65.9 7 8.5 Visually Impaired 50 44 88.0 70.0 6 12.0 Other Health Impaired 1,397 1,230 88.0 61.8 167 12.0 Orthopedically Impaired 57 48 84.2 54.4 9 15.8 Traumatic Brain Injury 30 20 66.7 46.7 10 33.3 Autistic 139 62 44.6 31.7 77 55.4 Severely/Profoundly Mentally Disabled 38 2 5.3 * 36 94.7 Multihandicapped 70 8 11.4 * 62 88.6 Deaf-Blind 10 5 50.0 30.0 5 50.0 Trainable Mentally Disabled 199 12 6.0 * 187 94.0 Section 504 1,391 1,369 98.4 87.5 22 1.6 Notes: 1"Membership" is the total number of students on the 2003-04 Masterbuild data file. *Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. These data represent coding on the 2003-04 test documents. 2"N Tested" represents the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Table 3. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Statewide Number of Students Tested and Number Not Tested, Grade 10 Category Not Tested N Absent/ Other % Absent/ Other 3 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Membership1 N Tested2 % Tested % Proficient All Students 83,535 80,008 95.8 91.4 3,527 4.2 Female 42,474 40,867 96.2 92.7 1,607 3.8 Male 41,061 39,141 95.3 90.0 1,920 4.7 American Indian 1,017 976 96.0 89.8 41 4.0 Asian 1,786 1,677 93.9 87.0 109 6.1 Black 22,928 21,543 94.0 85.4 1,385 6.0 Hispanic 3,331 3,059 91.8 79.1 272 8.2 Multi-Racial 1,105 1,025 92.8 89.1 80 7.2 White 53,368 51,728 96.9 94.9 1,640 3.1 Title I 573 522 91.1 73.3 51 8.9 Schoolwide Title I 395 357 90.4 76.2 38 9.6 Targeted Assistance Title I 92 82 89.1 64.1 10 10.9 Not Title I 66,474 64,876 97.6 93.9 1,598 2.4 Migrant 90 86 95.6 70.0 4 4.4 Not Migrant 66,957 65,312 97.5 93.7 1,645 2.5 Free/Reduced Lunch** Not Free/Reduced Lunch** Limited English Proficient 244 215 88.1 56.6 29 11.9 Not Limited English Proficient 83,291 79,793 95.8 91.5 3,498 4.2 Students With Disabilities 6,313 5,899 93.4 76.9 414 6.6 Students Without Disabilities 77,222 74,109 96.0 92.6 3,113 4.0 Students With IEPs 5,460 5,065 92.8 74.5 395 7.2 Students Without IEPs 78,075 74,943 96.0 92.5 3,132 4.0 Behaviorally-Emotionally Disabled 326 293 89.9 64.7 33 10.1 Hearing Impaired 74 72 97.3 82.4 2 2.7 Educable Mentally Disabled 498 380 76.3 35.5 118 23.7 Specific Learning Disabled 3,384 3,293 97.3 81.1 91 2.7 Speech-Language Impaired 34 30 88.2 73.5 4 11.8 Visually Impaired 28 27 96.4 92.9 1 3.6 Other Health Impaired 873 818 93.7 81.2 55 6.3 Orthopedically Impaired 39 32 82.1 74.4 7 17.9 Traumatic Brain Injury 22 19 86.4 68.2 3 13.6 Autistic 79 57 72.2 55.7 22 27.8 Severely/Profoundly Mentally Disabled 13 2 15.4 * 11 84.6 Multihandicapped 13 6 46.2 23.1 7 53.8 Deaf-Blind 18 18 100.0 72.2 0 0.0 Trainable Mentally Disabled 59 18 30.5 13.6 41 69.5 Section 504 853 834 97.8 92.0 19 2.2 Notes: 1"Membership" is the total number of students on the 2003-04 Masterbuild data file. *Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. **Free/ Reduced Lunch information is not collected for grades 9 and 11. These data represent coding on the 2003-04 test documents. 2"N Tested" represents the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Table 4. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Statewide Number of Students Tested and Number Not Tested, Grade 11 Category Not Tested N Absent/ Other % Absent/ Other 4 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Membership1 N Tested2 % Tested % Proficient All Students 76,846 74,170 96.5 94.1 2,676 3.5 Female 39,188 38,065 97.1 >=95% 1,123 2.9 Male 37,658 36,105 95.9 93.0 1,553 4.1 American Indian 958 921 96.1 93.1 37 3.9 Asian 1,722 1,662 96.5 93.1 60 3.5 Black 20,929 19,828 94.7 89.7 1,101 5.3 Hispanic 2,614 2,468 94.4 88.6 146 5.6 Multi-Racial 811 781 96.3 94.5 30 3.7 White 49,812 48,510 97.4 >=95% 1,302 2.6 Title I 552 466 84.4 75.5 86 15.6 Schoolwide Title I 442 369 83.5 75.1 73 16.5 Targeted Assistance Title I 46 39 84.8 76.1 7 15.2 Not Title I 72,153 69,772 96.7 94.5 2,381 3.3 Migrant 66 60 90.9 78.8 6 9.1 Not Migrant 72,639 70,178 96.6 94.3 2,461 3.4 Free/Reduced Lunch 16,256 15,455 95.1 90.0 801 4.9 Not Free/Reduced Lunch 60,590 58,715 96.9 >=95% 1,875 3.1 Limited English Proficient 1,188 1,141 96.0 80.4 47 4.0 Not Limited English Proficient 75,658 73,029 96.5 94.4 2,629 3.5 Students With Disabilities 6,784 5,671 83.6 69.3 1,113 16.4 Students Without Disabilities 70,062 68,499 97.8 >=95% 1,563 2.2 Students With IEPs 6,328 5,219 82.5 67.3 1,109 17.5 Students Without IEPs 70,518 68,951 97.8 >=95% 1,567 2.2 Behaviorally-Emotionally Disabled 232 212 91.4 71.6 20 8.6 Hearing Impaired 86 82 95.3 86.0 4 4.7 Educable Mentally Disabled 1,026 597 58.2 21.7 429 41.8 Specific Learning Disabled 3,505 3,389 96.7 85.1 116 3.3 Speech-Language Impaired 41 39 95.1 78.0 2 4.9 Visually Impaired 35 31 88.6 85.7 4 11.4 Other Health Impaired 708 668 94.4 84.0 40 5.6 Orthopedically Impaired 53 43 81.1 71.7 10 18.9 Traumatic Brain Injury 53 38 71.7 69.8 15 28.3 Autistic 153 62 40.5 29.4 91 59.5 Severely/Profoundly Mentally Disabled 56 8 14.3 14.3 48 85.7 Multihandicapped 119 11 9.2 * 108 90.8 Deaf-Blind 21 19 90.5 76.2 2 9.5 Trainable Mentally Disabled 240 20 8.3 <=5% 220 91.7 Section 504 456 452 99.1 >=95% 4 0.9 Notes: 1"Membership" is the total number of students on the 2003-04 Masterbuild data file. *Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. These data represent coding on the 2003-04 test documents. 2"N Tested" represents the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Table 5. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Statewide Number of Students Tested and Number Not Tested, Grade 12 Category Not Tested N Absent/ Other % Absent/ Other 5 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 6 1999-00 Class of 2004 Class of 2003 Class of 2002 Class of 2001 Class of 2000 N Passing = 67,896 N Passing = 76,760 N Passing =70,072 N Passing =62,505 N Passing =59,057 Membership*= 95,354 Membership*=101,423 Membership*=81,196 Membership*=69,299 Membership*=63,406 2000-01 Class of 2005 Class of 2004 Class of 2003 Class of 2002 Class of 2001 N Passing = 74,533 N Passing = 78,865 N Passing =74,885 N Passing =65,348 N Passing =60,732 Membership*= 97,898 Membership*=102,252 Membership*=85,592 Membership*=71,603 Membership*=64,516 2001-02 Class of 2006 Class of 2005 Class of 2004 Class of 2003 Class of 2002 N Passing = 74,118 N Passing = 87,787 N Passing =79,914 N Passing =71,818 N Passing =66,679 Membership*=102,735 Membership*=112,212 Membership*=92,628 Membership*=79,057 Membership*=71,077 2002-03 Class of 2007 Class of 2006 Class of 2005 Class of 2004 Class of 2003 N Passing = 81,682 N Passing = 87,384 N Passing =81,564 N Passing =72,848 N Passing =70,768 Membership*=106,197 Membership*=113,969 Membership*=93,055 Membership*=79,898 Membership*=74,833 2003-04 Class of 2008 Class of 2007 Class of 2006 Class of 2005 Class of 2004 N Passing = 85,116 N Passing = 93,197 N Passing =83,686 N Passing =76,325 N Passing =72,349 Membership*=109,466 Membership*=119,403 Membership*=97,211 Membership*=83,535 Membership*=76,846 Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). *Membership equals the total number of records on the NCDPI Masterbuild file. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Figure 1. 1999-00 to 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard, Percent Passing1 by Class 71.2 75.7 86.3 90.2 93.1 76.1 77.1 87.5 91.3 94.1 72.1 78.2 86.3 90.8 93.8 76.9 76.7 87.7 91.2 94.6 77.8 78.1 86.1 91.4 94.1 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 8th Grade 9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade 12th Grade Percent Passing 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 7 Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Figure 2. 1999-00 to 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard, Percent Passing1 at the End of Grades 8-12 76.9 71.2 76.1 72.1 77.8 76.7 75.7 77.1 78.2 78.1 86.3 87.5 86.3 87.7 86.1 90.2 91.3 90.8 91.2 91.4 93.1 94.1 93.8 94.6 94.1 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 Percent Passing Grade 9 Grade 12 Grade 11 Grade 10 Grade 8 8 Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency tests(s), or competency screen(s). 21996-97 data reflect changes received from LEAs after publication of the 1996-97 Competency Report. 31997-98 was the first year that 12th grade was tested. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Figure 3. 1996-97 to 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard, Percent Passing1 for the Classes of 1999-2008 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 84.3 90.2 89.0 92.8 90.2 93.1 91.3 94.1 90.8 93.8 94.6 77.8 78.1 86.1 91.4 94.1 73.3 61.9 84.8 73.6 68.4 84.3 74.6 68.6 86.3 71.2 75.7 87.5 77.1 76.1 86.3 78.2 72.1 91.2 87.7 76.7 76.9 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 Percent Passing 1996-97² 1997-98³ 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 Grade: Class of: 8 8 9 8 9 10 8 9 10 11 8 9 101112 8 9 10 11 12 8 9 101112 8 9 101112 9 1011 12 10 11 12 9 Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screens(s). Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Figure 4. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent Passing1 by Ethnicity for the Classes of 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008, at the End of the 2003-04 School Year Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 77.8 78.1 86.1 91.4 94.1 71.7 69.1 79.6 89.8 93.1 83.8 79.8 83.4 87.0 93.1 63.0 65.2 76.2 85.4 89.7 59.0 52.9 66.8 79.1 88.6 81.5 81.7 86.9 89.1 94.5 86.9 87.6 92.4 94.9 >=95 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 Percent Passing All Students American Indian Asian Black Hispanic Multi-Racial White Class of: Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 10 Figure 5. 1999-00 to 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent Passing1 by Ethnicity for the Classes of 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008 at End of Grade 8 1999-00 N Passing = 67,896 N Passing = 853 N Passing =1,305 N Passing =14,224 N Passing =1,437 N Passing = 551 N Passing =49,526 Class of 2004 Membership* = 95,354 Membership* =1,403 Membership* =1,735 Membership* =27,689 Membership* =3,056 Membership* = 761 Membership* =60,710 2000-01 N Passing = 74,533 N Passing =1,000 N Passing =1,341 N Passing =16,980 N Passing =1,991 N Passing = 806 N Passing =52,415 Class of 2005 Membership* = 97,898 Membership* =1,512 Membership* =1,740 Membership* =28,820 Membership* =3,897 Membership* = 991 Membership* =60,938 2001-02 N Passing = 74,118 N Passing = 849 N Passing =1,485 N Passing =16,424 N Passing =2,149 N Passing = 949 N Passing =52,239 Class of 2006 Membership* =102,735 Membership* =1,411 Membership* =1,919 Membership* =30,491 Membership* =4,531 Membership* =1,259 Membership* =63,072 2002-03 N Passing = 81,682 N Passing =1,006 N Passing =1,687 N Passing =19,489 N Passing =3,029 N Passing =1,242 N Passing =55,229 Class of 2007 Membership* =106,197 Membership* =1,489 Membership* =2,046 Membership* =31,809 Membership* =5,347 Membership* =1,541 Membership* =63,965 2003-04 N Passing = 85,116 N Passing =1,111 N Passing =1,775 N Passing =20,834 N Passing =3,588 N Passing =1,531 N Passing =56,277 Class of 2008 Membership* =109,466 Membership* =1,550 Membership* =2,118 Membership* =33,075 Membership* =6,080 Membership* =1,879 Membership* =64,764 Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency tests(s), or competency screen(s). *Membership equals the total number of records on the NCDPI Masterbuild file. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. 71.2 60.8 51.4 47.0 76.1 66.1 77.1 58.9 51.1 81.3 86.0 72.1 60.2 77.4 53.9 75.4 82.8 61.3 80.6 86.3 81.6 75.2 72.4 47.4 56.6 82.5 67.6 76.9 86.9 81.5 63.0 59.0 83.8 71.7 77.8 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 All Students American Indian Asian Black Hispanic Multi-Racial White Percent Passing 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 11 1999-00 N Passing = 76,760 N Passing = 906 N Passing =1,400 N Passing =18,440 N Passing =1,600 N Passing = 563 N Passing =53,849 Class of 2003 Membership* =101,423 Membership* =1,496 Membership* =1,934 Membership* =30,830 Membership* =3,174 Membership* = 741 Membership* =63,241 2000-01 N Passing = 78,865 N Passing =1,046 N Passing =1,490 N Passing =18,964 N Passing =1,948 N Passing = 693 N Passing =54,724 Class of 2004 Membership* =102,252 Membership* =1,561 Membership* =1,967 Membership* =30,597 Membership* =3,911 Membership* = 895 Membership* =63,314 2001-02 N Passing = 87,787 N Passing =1,236 N Passing =1,582 N Passing =22,750 N Passing =2,630 N Passing = 999 N Passing =58,554 Class of 2005 Membership* =112,212 Membership* =1,886 Membership* =2,061 Membership* =34,696 Membership* =5,096 Membership* =1,275 Membership* =67,144 2002-03 N Passing = 87,384 N Passing =1,138 N Passing =1,651 N Passing =22,378 N Passing =2,888 N Passing =1,122 N Passing =58,207 Class of 2006 Membership* =113,969 Membership* =1,766 Membership* =2,198 Membership* =35,121 Membership* =5,932 Membership* =1,441 Membership* =67,511 2003-04 N Passing = 93,197 N Passing =1,255 N Passing =1,854 N Passing =24,260 N Passing =3,731 N Passing =1,495 N Passing =60,602 Class of 2007 Membership* =119,403 Membership* =1,816 Membership* =2,324 Membership* =37,228 Membership* =7,053 Membership* =1,829 Membership* =69,153 Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). *Membership equals the total number of records on the NCDPI Masterbuild file. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Figure 6. 1999-00 to 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent Passing1 by Ethnicity for the Classes of 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007 at End of Grade 9 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 75.7 60.6 72.4 59.8 50.4 76.0 85.1 77.1 67.0 75.7 62.0 49.8 77.4 86.4 78.2 65.5 76.8 65.6 51.6 78.4 87.2 76.7 64.4 75.1 63.7 48.7 77.9 86.2 78.1 69.1 79.8 65.2 52.9 81.7 87.6 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 All Students American Indian Asian Black Hispanic Multi-Racial White Percent Passing 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 12 1999-00 N Passing = 70,072 N Passing = 852 N Passing =1,381 N Passing =17,081 N Passing =1,317 N Passing = 474 N Passing =48,965 Class of 2002 Membership* = 81,196 Membership* =1,124 Membership* =1,696 Membership* =22,730 Membership* =1,853 Membership* = 553 Membership* =53,235 2000-01 N Passing =74,885 N Passing = 871 N Passing =1,459 N Passing =18,706 N Passing =1,664 N Passing = 621 N Passing =51,564 Class of 2003 Membership* =85,592 Membership* =1,068 Membership* =1,778 Membership* =24,137 Membership* =2,396 Membership* = 691 Membership* =55,521 2001-02 N Passing =79,914 N Passing =1,007 N Passing =1,633 N Passing =19,952 N Passing =2,100 N Passing = 726 N Passing =54,477 Class of 2004 Membership* =92,628 Membership* =1,228 Membership* =1,973 Membership* =26,363 Membership* =3,171 Membership* = 837 Membership* =59,025 2002-03 N Passing =81,564 N Passing =1,050 N Passing =1,610 N Passing =20,986 N Passing =2,620 N Passing = 991 N Passing =54,307 Class of 2005 Membership* =93,055 Membership* =1,265 Membership* =1,919 Membership* =26,528 Membership* =3,826 Membership* =1,143 Membership* =58,374 2003-04 N Passing =83,686 N Passing =1,021 N Passing =1,702 N Passing =21,424 N Passing =2,994 N Passing =1,163 N Passing =55,382 Class of 2006 Membership* =97,211 Membership* =1,283 Membership* =2,041 Membership* =28,103 Membership* =4,482 Membership* =1,339 Membership* =59,963 Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). *Membership equals the total number of records on the NCDPI Masterbuild file. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Figure 7. 1999-00 to 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent Passing1 by Ethnicity for the Classes of 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006 at End of Grade 10 86.3 75.8 81.4 75.1 71.1 85.7 92.0 87.5 81.6 82.1 77.5 69.4 89.9 92.9 86.3 82.0 82.8 75.7 66.2 86.7 92.3 87.7 83.0 83.9 79.1 68.5 86.7 93.0 86.1 79.6 83.4 76.2 66.8 86.9 92.4 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0 All Students American Indian Asian Black Hispanic Multi-Racial White Percent Passing 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 13 1999-00 N Passing =62,505 N Passing = 676 N Passing =1,209 N Passing =15,553 N Passing =1,119 N Passing = 316 N Passing =43,632 Class of 2002 Membership* = 69,299 Membership* = 822 Membership* =1,438 Membership* =18,841 Membership* =1,389 Membership* = 365 Membership* =46,444 2000-01 N Passing =65,348 N Passing = 721 N Passing =1,346 N Passing =15,964 N Passing =1,336 N Passing = 479 N Passing =45,502 Class of 2003 Membership* =71,603 Membership* = 830 Membership* =1,551 Membership* =18,969 Membership* =1,669 Membership* = 538 Membership* =48,046 2001-02 N Passing =71,818 N Passing = 766 N Passing =1,414 N Passing =17,748 N Passing =1,759 N Passing = 605 N Passing =49,485 Class of 2004 Membership* =79,057 Membership* = 861 Membership* =1,639 Membership* =21,178 Membership* =2,235 Membership* = 690 Membership* =52,397 2002-03 N Passing =72,848 N Passing = 899 N Passing =1,538 N Passing =17,967 N Passing =2,044 N Passing = 742 N Passing =49,658 Class of 2005 Membership* =79,898 Membership* =1,000 Membership* =1,752 Membership* =21,330 Membership* =2,640 Membership* = 817 Membership* =52,359 2003-04 N Passing =76,325 N Passing = 913 N Passing =1,553 N Passing =19,570 N Passing =2,634 N Passing = 985 N Passing =50,670 Class of 2006 Membership* =83,535 Membership* =1,017 Membership* =1,786 Membership* =22,928 Membership* =3,331 Membership* =1,105 Membership* =53,368 Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). *Membership equals the total number of records on the NCDPI Masterbuild file. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Figure 8. 1999-00 to 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent Passing1 by Ethnicity for the Classes of 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006 at End of Grade 11 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 90.2 82.2 84.1 82.5 80.6 86.6 91.3 93.9 86.9 86.8 84.2 80.0 89.0 94.7 90.8 89.0 86.3 83.8 78.7 87.7 94.4 91.2 89.9 87.8 84.2 77.4 90.8 94.8 91.4 89.8 87.0 85.4 79.1 89.1 94.9 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0 All Students American Indian Asian Black Hispanic Multi-Racial White Percent Passing 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 14 1999-00 N Passing =59,057 N Passing =664 N Passing =1,246 N Passing =15,173 N Passing =1,013 N Passing =315 N Passing = ** Class of 2000 Membership* =63,406 Membership* =771 Membership* =1,389 Membership* =17,191 Membership* =1,167 Membership* =342 Membership* =42,541 2000-01 N Passing =60,732 N Passing =712 N Passing =1,287 N Passing =15,741 N Passing =1,179 N Passing =353 N Passing = ** Class of 2001 Membership* =64,516 Membership* =779 Membership* =1,391 Membership* =17,570 Membership* =1,314 Membership* =378 Membership* =43,084 2001-02 N Passing =66,679 N Passing =766 N Passing =1, 416 N Passing =16,891 N Passing =1,519 N Passing =500 N Passing = ** Class of 2002 Membership* =71,077 Membership* =830 Membership* =1,554 Membership* =18,957 Membership* =1,709 Membership* =537 Membership* =47,442 2002-03 N Passing =70,768 N Passing =767 N Passing =1,472 N Passing =18,197 N Passing =1,953 N Passing =646 N Passing = ** Class of 2003 Membership* =74,833 Membership* =811 Membership* =1,596 Membership* =20,117 Membership* =2,173 Membership* =681 Membership* =49,455 2003-04 N Passing =72,349 N Passing =892 N Passing =1,604 N Passing =18,766 N Passing =2,315 N Passing =766 N Passing = ** Class of 2004 Membership* =76,846 Membership* =958 Membership* =1,722 Membership* =20,929 Membership* =2,614 Membership* =811 Membership* =49,812 Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). *Membership equals the total number of records on the NCDPI Masterbuild file. **Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Figure 9. 1999-00 to 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent Passing1 by Ethnicity for the Classes of 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004 at End of Grade 12 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 93.1 86.1 89.7 88.3 86.8 94.1 91.4 92.5 89.6 89.7 92.1 93.8 92.3 91.1 93.4 89.1 88.9 94.6 94.6 92.2 90.5 93.1 89.9 94.1 93.1 93.1 94.9 89.7 88.6 94.5 >=95 >=95 >=95>=95 >=95 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0 All Students American Indian Asian Black Hispanic Multi-Racial White Percent Passing 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 12 Category Member-ship Number Passing Percent Proficient Member-ship Number Passing Percent Proficient Member-ship Number Passing Percent Proficient Member-ship Number Passing Percent Proficient Member-ship Number Passing Percent Proficient All Students 109,466 85,116 77.8 119,403 93,197 78.1 97,211 83,686 86.1 83,535 76,325 91.4 76,846 72,349 94.1 Academically/Intellectually Gifted AIG Reading 14,856 * >=95 15,976 * >=95 15,538 * >=95 14,262 * >=95 10,369 * >=95 AIG Mathematics 14,283 * >=95 15,734 * >=95 15,720 * >=95 14,224 * >=95 10,369 * >=95 All Students with Disabilities2 16,982 7,030 41.4 13,291 7,196 54.1 11,373 6,337 55.7 6,313 4,853 76.9 6,784 4,704 69.3 Behaviorally-Emotionally Disabled 1,382 378 27.4 1,254 450 35.9 753 332 44.1 326 211 64.7 232 166 71.6 Hearing Impaired 122 58 47.5 111 65 58.6 128 68 53.1 74 61 82.4 86 74 86.0 Educable Mentally Disabled 2,657 * <=5 1,048 135 12.9 1,596 121 7.6 498 177 35.5 1,026 223 21.7 Specific Learning Disabled 7,297 3,711 50.9 6,886 3,911 56.8 5,433 3,549 65.3 3,384 2,746 81.1 3,505 2,982 85.1 Learning Disabled-Reading 5,385 2,558 47.5 7,793 4,037 51.8 5,993 3,812 63.6 4,639 3,564 76.8 3,799 3,278 86.3 Learning Disabled-Mathematics 2,971 1,149 38.7 4,766 2,116 44.4 4,093 2,421 59.1 3,274 2,454 75.0 2,743 2,345 85.5 Learning Disabled-Written Expression 5,742 3,060 53.3 8,273 4,555 55.1 6,519 4,340 66.6 5,157 4,075 79.0 4,196 3,694 88.0 Learning Disabled-Other 189 95 50.3 467 282 60.4 620 419 67.6 530 436 82.3 475 417 87.8 Speech-Language Impaired 195 109 55.9 115 62 53.9 82 54 65.9 34 25 73.5 41 32 78.0 Visually Impaired 56 35 62.5 62 43 69.4 50 35 70.0 28 26 92.9 35 30 85.7 Other Health Impaired 2,368 1,059 44.7 1,914 1,088 56.8 1,397 863 61.8 873 709 81.2 708 595 84.0 Orthopedically Impaired 62 28 45.2 40 25 62.5 57 31 54.4 39 29 74.4 53 38 71.7 Traumatic Brain Injured 67 23 34.3 40 16 40.0 30 14 46.7 22 15 68.2 53 37 69.8 Autistic 316 72 22.8 118 64 54.2 139 44 31.7 79 44 55.7 153 45 29.4 Severely/Profoundly Mentally Disabled 62 * <=5 13 * * 38 * <=5 13 1 7.7 56 8 14.3 Multihandicapped 124 * <=5 17 2 11.8 70 * <=5 13 3 23.1 119 * <=5 Deaf/Blind 19 9 47.4 101 45 44.6 10 3 30.0 18 13 72.2 21 16 76.2 Trainable Mentally Disabled 269 * <=5 31 5 16.1 199 * <=5 59 8 13.6 240 * <=5 Section 504 1,986 1,456 73.3 1,541 1,285 83.4 1,391 1,217 87.5 853 785 92.0 456 * >=95 Not Coded 1,842 1,312 71.2 1,439 1,184 82.3 1,274 1,100 86.3 781 714 91.4 368 * >=95 Limited English Proficient 3,265 1,224 37.5 2,406 1,638 68.1 2,132 985 46.2 244 138 56.6 1,188 955 80.4 Not Served by Title I 88,046 70,302 79.8 109,098 89,947 82.4 94,546 82,086 86.8 66,474 62,399 93.9 72,153 68,154 94.5 Schoolwide Title I Program 20,102 14,100 70.1 879 485 55.2 634 385 60.7 395 301 76.2 442 332 75.1 Targeted Assistance 1,049 595 56.7 353 151 42.8 192 120 62.5 92 59 64.1 46 35 76.1 Migrant 688 417 60.6 210 93 44.3 141 74 52.5 90 63 70.0 66 52 78.8 Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). 2"All Students with Disabilities" includes "Section 504" but not those in the "Not Coded" category. *Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. All variables were merged from external data sources with the Masterbuild file. Due to the challenges of merging multiple files, inconsistencies in data quality may increase from grade 8 to grade 12. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Across Grades 8 - 12 Table 6. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent Passing the Competency Standard1 Performance of Exceptional, Limited English Proficient, and Title I Students, 15 Grade 8 N Passing = 85,116 N Passing = 7,030 Membership = 109,466 Membership = 16,982 Grade 9 N Passing = 93,197 N Passing = 7,196 Membership = 119,403 Membership = 13,291 Grade 10 N Passing = 83,686 N Passing = 6,337 Membership = 97,211 Membership = 11,373 Grade 11 N Passing = 76,325 N Passing = 4,853 Membership = 83,535 Membership = 6,313 Grade 12 N Passing = 72,349 N Passing = 4,704 Membership = 76,846 Membership = 6,784 Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency tests(s), or competency screen(s). Due to challenges of merging multiple files, inconsistencies in data quality may increase from grade 8 to grade 12. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Grades 8-12 Report of Student Performance in the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Figure 10. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent Passing the Competency Standard,1 Performance of Students with Disabilities, 77.8 41.4 78.1 54.1 86.1 55.7 91.4 76.9 94.1 69.3 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 State All Students with Disabilities Percent Passing Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 12 16 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 BED- Behaviorally-Emotionally Disabled HI- Hearing Impaired EMD-Educable Mentally Disabled SLD- Specific Learning Disabled SLI- Speech-Language Impaired VI- Visually Impaired OHI-Other Health Impaired OI-Orthopedically Impaired Grade 8 N Passing = 85,116 N Passing = 7,030 N Passing = 378 N Passing = 58 N Passing = * N Passing = 3,711 N Passing = 109 N Passing = 35 N Passing = 1,059 N Passing = 28 Membership =109,466 Membership = 16,982 Membership = 1,382 Membership = 122 Membership = 2,657 Membership = 7,297 Membership = 195 Membership = 56 Membership = 2,368 Membership = 62 Grade 9 N Passing = 93,197 N Passing = 7,196 N Passing = 450 N Passing = 65 N Passing = 135 N Passing = 3,911 N Passing = 62 N Passing = 43 N Passing = 1,088 N Passing = 25 Membership =119,403 Membership = 13,291 Membership = 1,254 Membership = 111 Membership = 1,048 Membership = 6,886 Membership = 115 Membership = 62 Membership = 1,914 Membership = 40 Grade 10 N Passing = 83,686 N Passing = 6,337 N Passing = 332 N Passing = 68 N Passing = 121 N Passing = 3,549 N Passing = 54 N Passing = 35 N Passing = 863 N Passing = 31 Membership = 97,211 Membership = 11,373 Membership = 753 Membership = 128 Membership = 1,596 Membership = 5,433 Membership = 82 Membership = 50 Membership = 1,397 Membership = 57 Grade 11 N Passing = 76,325 N Passing = 4,853 N Passing = 211 N Passing = 61 N Passing = 177 N Passing = 2,746 N Passing = 25 N Passing = 26 N Passing = 709 N Passing = 29 Membership = 83,535 Membership = 6,313 Membership = 326 Membership = 74 Membership = 498 Membership = 3,384 Membership = 34 Membership = 28 Membership = 873 Membership = 39 Grade 12 N Passing = 72,349 N Passing = 4,704 N Passing = 166 N Passing = 74 N Passing = 223 N Passing = 2,982 N Passing = 32 N Passing = 30 N Passing = 595 N Passing = 38 Membership = 76,846 Membership = 6,784 Membership = 232 Membership = 86 Membership = 1,026 Membership = 3,505 Membership = 41 Membership = 35 Membership = 708 Membership = 53 Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). Due to challenges of merging multiple files, inconsistencies in data quality may increase from grade 8 to grade 12. *Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. 17 Figure 11. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent Passing the Competency Standard,1 Performance of Students with Disabilities by Classification, Grades 8-12 77.8 12.9 53.1 7.6 70.0 54.4 82.4 92.9 81.2 74.4 69.3 71.6 86.0 21.7 85.1 78.0 85.7 84.0 71.7 <=5 50.9 55.9 27.4 41.4 62.5 45.2 44.7 47.5 56.8 53.9 35.9 54.1 78.1 69.4 62.5 56.8 58.6 65.3 65.9 44.1 55.7 86.1 61.8 35.5 81.1 73.5 64.7 76.9 91.4 94.1 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 State All Students with Disabilities BED HI EMD SLD SLI VI OHI OI Percent Passing Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 12 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 TBI-Traumatic Brain Injured A - Autistic D/B - Deaf/Blind SPMD - Severely/Profoundly Mentally Disabled MH-Multihandicapped TMD - Trainable Mentally Disabled 504 - Section 504 Grade 8 N Passing = 85,116 N Passing = 7,030 N Passing = 23 N Passing = 72 N Passing = 9 N Passing = * N Passing = * N Passing = * N Passing = 1,456 Membership = 109,466 Membership = 16,982 Membership = 67 Membership = 316 Membership = 19 Membership = 62 Membership = 124 Membership = 269 Membership = 1,986 Grade 9 N Passing = 93,197 N Passing = 7,196 N Passing = 16 N Passing = 64 N Passing = 45 N Passing = * N Passing = 2 N Passing = 5 N Passing = 1,285 Membership = 119,403 Membership = 13,291 Membership = 40 Membership = 118 Membership = 101 Membership = 13 Membership = 17 Membership = 31 Membership = 1,541 Grade 10 N Passing = 83,686 N Passing = 6,337 N Passing = 14 N Passing = 44 N Passing = 3 N Passing = * N Passing = * N Passing = * N Passing = 1,217 Membership = 97,211 Membership = 11,373 Membership = 30 Membership = 139 Membership = 10 Membership = 38 Membership = 70 Membership = 199 Membership = 1,391 Grade 11 N Passing = 76,325 N Passing = 4,853 N Passing = 15 N Passing = 44 N Passing = 13 N Passing = 1 N Passing = 3 N Passing = 8 N Passing = 785 Membership = 83,535 Membership = 6,313 Membership = 22 Membership = 79 Membership = 18 Membership = 13 Membership = 13 Membership = 59 Membership = 853 Grade 12 N Passing = 72,349 N Passing = 4,704 N Passing = 37 N Passing = 45 N Passing = 16 N Passing = 8 N Passing = * N Passing = * N Passing = * Membership = 76,846 Membership = 6,784 Membership = 53 Membership = 153 Membership = 21 Membership = 56 Membership = 119 Membership = 240 Membership = 456 Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency sc Due to challenges of merging multiple files, inconsistencies in data quality may increase from grade 8 to grade 12. *Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Testing Program 18 Figure 11. 2003-04 North Carolina Competency Tests Percent Passing the Competency Standard,1 Performance of Students with Disabilities by Classification, Grades 8-12 (continued) 77.8 47.4 44.6 31.7 30.0 55.7 13.6 92.0 69.3 69.8 29.4 76.2 <=5 <=5 34.3 41.4 <=5 73.3 22.8 <=5 11.8 40.0 54.1 78.1 16.1 83.4 54.2 <=5 <=5 46.7 55.7 86.1 87.5 <=5 72.2 7.7 23.1 68.2 76.9 91.4 94.1 14.3 84.0 <=5 <=5 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 State All Students with Disabilities TBI A D/B SPMD MH TMD 504 Percent Passing Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 12 Grade 8 N Passing = 85,116 N Passing =1,224 Membership=109,466 Membership=3,265 Grade 9 N Passing = 93,197 N Passing =1,638 Membership=119,403 Membership=2,406 Grade 10 N Passing = 83,686 N Passing = 985 Membership= 97,211 Membership=2,132 Grade 11 N Passing = 76,325 N Passing = 138 Membership= 83,535 Membership= 244 Grade 12 N Passing = 72,349 N Passing = 955 Membership= 76,846 Membership=1,188 Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s) Due to challenges of merging multiple files, inconsistencies in data quality may increase from grade 8 to grade 12 Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program Grades 8-12 Report of Student Performance in the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Figure 12. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent Passing the Competency Standard,1 Performance of Limited English Proficient Students, 77.8 37.5 78.1 68.1 86.1 46.2 91.4 56.6 94.1 80.4 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 State Limited English Proficient Percent Passing Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 12 19 Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). Due to rounding, percents may not sum to 100.0 percent. All LEAs are included in this figure. Data received from LEAs after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 at End of Grade 8 Figure 13. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent of LEAs and Charter Schools in Each Percent Passing1 Category, for the Class of 2008, 9.5% 43.8% 27.8% 11.2% 5.3% 2.4% Below 50% 50-59% 60-69% 70-79% 80-89% 90% (or above) Percent Passing Categories: 20 Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). Due to rounding, percents may not sum to 100.0 percent. All LEAs are included in this figure. Data received from LEAs after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 at End of Grade 9 Figure 14. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent of LEAs and Charter Schools in Each Percent Passing1 Category, for the Class of 2007, 24.1% 41.8% 9.9% 3.6% 6.4% 14.2% Below 50% 50-59% 60-69% 70-79% 80-89% 90% (or above) Percent Passing Categories: 21 Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). Due to rounding, percents may not sum to 100.0 percent. All LEAs are included in this figure. Data received from LEAs after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 at End of Grade 10 Figure 15. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent of LEAs and Charter Schools in Each Percent Passing1 Category, for the Class of 2006, 0.0% 2.2% 11.6% 3.6% 42.8% 39.9% Below 50% 50-59% 60-69% 70-79% 80-89% 90% (or above) Percent Passing Categories: 22 Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). Due to rounding, percents may not sum to 100.0 percent. All LEAs are included in this figure. Data received from LEAs after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 at End of Grade 11 Figure 16. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent of LEAs and Charter Schools in Each Percent Passing1 Category, for the Class of 2005, 75.0% 0.8% 0.0% 3.8% 18.2% 2.3% Below 50% 50-59% 60-69% 70-79% 80-89% 90% (or above) Percent Passing Categories: 23 Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). Due to rounding, percents may not sum to 100.0 percent. All LEAs are included in this figure. Data received from LEAs after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 at End of Grade 12 Figure 17. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent of LEAs and Charter Schools in Each Percent Passing1 Category, for the Class of 2004, 89.2% 8.5% 0.8% 0.8% 0.0% 0.8% Below 50% 50-59% 60-69% 70-79% 80-89% 90% (or above) Percent Passing Categories: 24 25 Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). All LEAs are included in this figure. Data received from LEAs after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. at the End of Grades 8-12 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Figure 18. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent of LEAs and Charter Schools in Each Percent Passing1 Category, for the Class of 2004, End of Grade 8 End of Grade 9 End of Grade 10 End of Grade 11 End of Grade 12 Below 50% 50-59% 60-69% 70-79% 80-89% 90% (or above) Percent Passing Categories: Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Below 50% N=9 Carter Community** Alamance-Burlington Hickory City Alexander Hyde Imani Institute** Alpha Academy** Lee Alleghany Iredell-Statesville Kennedy Charter** Asheboro City Lenoir American Ren. Middle** Jackson Lakeside School** Asheville City Madison Avery Johnston Omuteko Gwamaziima** Bertie Martin Beaufort Kings Mountain City Provisions Academy** Bladen Montgomery Bethany Community** Lincoln SPARC Academy** Brunswick Mountain Community** Brevard Academy** Macon Success Institute** Burke Nash-Rocky Mount Buncombe McDowell Sugar Creek** Caswell Perquimans C.G. Woodson** Mitchell Charlotte/Mecklenburg Pitt CIS Academy** Moore Columbus Research Triangle** Cabarrus Mooresville City Craven Richmond Caldwell New Hanover 50-59% Cumberland River Mill Academy** Camden Newton-Conover City N=4 Duplin Roanoke Rapids City Cape Fear Center** Onslow Ann Atwater** Edgecombe Rockingham Carteret Orange Bridges** Elizabeth City/Pasquotank Rowan-Salisbury Catawba Orange Charter** S.B. Howard** Forsyth Academies** Rutherford Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Pamlico Vance Franklin Sampson Chatham Pender Gaston Scotland Cleveland Person Gates Swain Clinton City Piedmont Community** Greene Wayne Clover Garden** Polk Guilford Winston-Salem/Forsyth Currituck Quality Education** Halifax Yadkin Dare Randolph 60-69% Harnett Davidson Stanly N=19 Davie Stokes Academy of Moore County** Downtown Middle** Summit Charter** Anson East Wake Academy** Surry Chatham Charter** Edenton/Chowan Swain Durham Elkin City Thomas Jefferson** Guilford Charter** F Delany New School** Transylvania Hertford Graham Tyrrell Hoke Grandfather Academy** Union Jones Granville Vance Charter** Kannapolis City Greensboro Academy** Wake Kestrel Heights** Haliwa-Saponi Tribal** Wilkes Lexington City Haywood Wilson Northampton Henderson Yancey Robeson Shelby City Thomasville City Warren Arapahoe Charter** Lincoln Charter** Washington Ashe Magellan** Weldon City Cherokee Metrolina** Whiteville City Clay Mount Airy City Evergreen Community** Quest Academy** Exploris** Sterling Montessori** Franklin Academy** Watauga Lake Norman** Woods Charter** Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Data are rounded to the nearest whole percent for inclusion in the appropriate percent passing range category. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program 90% or Above N=16 Table 7. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent Passing* Category for the Class of 2008, at End of Grade 8, by LEA N=47 70-79% 80-89% N=74 26 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Below 50% 90% or above N=9 N=20 Alpha Academy** Alexander Jones Ashe C.G. Woodson** Alleghany Kings Mountain City Carteret Cape Lookout Marine** Asheboro City Lincoln Clover Garden** Crossroads Charter** Avery Martin East Wake Academy** J.H. Baker Jr High** Brunswick Moore Elkin City Kennedy Charter** Buncombe Mooresville City Franklin Academy** Lakeside School** Burke Nash-Rocky Mount Graham Laurinburg Charter** Cabarrus New Hanover Gray Stone Day** Provisions Academy** Camden Newton-Conover City Lincoln Charter** Catawba Onslow Macon Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Orange McDowell Chatham Pamlico Mount Airy City 50-59% Cherokee Perquimans Pender N=5 Clay Person Polk Crossnore Academy** Cleveland Pitt Raleigh Charter HS** Grandfather Academy** Clinton City Randolph River Mill Academy** Hertford Craven Rockingham Surry Laurinburg Homework** Currituck Rutherford Transylvania Lexington City Dare Sampson Watauga Davidson Stanly Woods Charter** Davie Stokes Edenton/Chowan Swain Franklin Thomas Jefferson** 60-69% Granville Tyrrell N=14 Haywood Union Ann Atwater** Henderson Wake Bertie Hyde Wilkes Durham Iredell-Statesville Yadkin Edgecombe Jackson Yancey Elizabeth City/Pasquotank Johnston Greene Halifax Hoke Kestrel Heights** Northampton Robeson Thomasville City Vance Whiteville City Alamance-Burlington Lee Anson Lenoir Asheville City Madison Beaufort Mitchell Bladen Montgomery Caldwell Richmond Caswell Roanoke Rapids City Charlotte/Mecklenburg Rocky Mount Prep Sch** Columbus Rowan-Salisbury Cumberland Scotland Duplin Shelby City Gaston Warren Gates Washington Guilford Wayne Harnett Weldon City Hickory City Wilson Kannapolis City Winston-Salem/Forsyth Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Data are rounded to the nearest whole percent for inclusion in the appropriate percent passing range category. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Table 8. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent Passing* Category for the Class of 2007, at End of Grade 9, by LEA 70-79% N=34 80-89% N=59 27 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Below 50% N=5 C.G. Woodson** Alamance-Burlington Madison Alexander Kannapolis City Crossnore Academy** Asheville City Martin Alleghany Kestrel Heights** Crossroads Charter** Beaufort Mitchell Ashe Laurinburg Homework** J.H. Baker Jr High** Bladen Montgomery Asheboro City Lee Laurinburg Charter** Brunswick Moore Avery Lenoir Burke Nash-Rocky Mount Buncombe Lincoln Charter** Caldwell Newton-Conover City Cabarrus Macon 50-59% Caswell Orange Camden McDowell N=0 Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Perquimans Carteret Mooresville City None Charlotte/Mecklenburg Richmond Catawba Mount Airy City Clay Roanoke Rapids City Chatham New Hanover Columbus Rockingham Cherokee Onslow Davidson Rowan-Salisbury Cleveland Pamlico 60-69% Duplin Rutherford Clinton City Pender N=3 Durham Scotland Clover Garden** Person Hertford Elizabeth City/Pasquotank Shelby City Craven Pitt Lakeside School** Franklin Swain Currituck Polk Provisions Academy** Gaston Vance Dare Raleigh Charter HS** Greene Wake Davie Randolph Guilford Warren East Wake Academy** River Mill Academy** Harnett Wayne Edenton/Chowan Sampson 70-79% Henderson Weldon City Elkin City Stanly N=16 Hoke Wilkes Franklin Academy** Stokes Anson Iredell-Statesville Wilson Gates Surry Bertie Jackson Winston-Salem/Forsyth Graham Thomas Jefferson** Cape Lookout Marine** Jones Yadkin Granville Transylvania Cumberland Kings Mountain City Yancey Gray Stone Day** Union Edgecombe Lincoln Haywood Watauga Halifax Hyde Woods Charter** Hickory City Johnston Kennedy Charter** Lexington City Northampton Robeson Rocky Mount Prep Sch** Thomasville City Tyrrell Washington Whiteville City Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Data are rounded to the nearest whole percent for inclusion in the appropriate percent passing range category. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. 80-89% N=55 Table 9. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent Passing* Category for the Class of 2006, at End of Grade 10, by LEA 90% or Above N=59 28 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Below 50% N=3 C.G. Woodson** Alamance-Burlington Gates Pamlico Crossroads Charter** Alexander Graham Pender Laurinburg Charter** Ashe Granville Perquimans Asheboro City Gray Stone Day** Person 50-59% Asheville City Halifax Pitt N=1 Beaufort Haywood Polk J.H. Baker Jr High** Bladen Henderson Raleigh Charter HS** Brunswick Hickory City Randolph Buncombe Hoke Richmond Burke Hyde River Mill Academy** 60-69% Cabarrus Iredell-Statesville Roanoke Rapids City N=0 Camden Jackson Rockingham None Carteret Johnston Rutherford Caswell Jones Sampson Catawba Kannapolis City Scotland Charlotte/Mecklenburg Kings Mountain City Stanly Chatham Lee Stokes 70-79% Cherokee Lenoir Surry N=5 Clay Lincoln Swain Hertford Cleveland Macon Thomas Jefferson** Kennedy Charter** Clinton City Madison Thomasville City Laurinburg Homework** Columbus Martin Transylvania Rocky Mount Prep Sch** Craven McDowell Tyrrell Shelby City Currituck Mitchell Union Dare Montgomery Vance Davidson Moore Warren Davie Mooresville City Watauga Alleghany Guilford Duplin Mount Airy City Weldon City Anson Harnett East Wake Academy** Nash-Rocky Mount Wilkes Avery Lexington City Edenton/Chowan New Hanover Winston-Salem/Forsyth Bertie Lincoln Charter** Elizabeth City/Pasquotank Newton-Conover City Woods Charter** Caldwell Northampton Elkin City Onslow Yadkin Cape Lookout Marine** Robeson Franklin Orange Yancey Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Rowan-Salisbury Cumberland Wake Durham Washington Edgecombe Wayne Gaston Whiteville City Greene Wilson Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Data are rounded to the nearest whole percent for inclusion in the appropriate percent passing range category. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. 80-89% N=24 N=99 Table 10. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent Passing* Category for the Class of 2005, at End of Grade 11, by LEA 90% or Above 29 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Below 50% N=1 Crossnore Academy** Alamance-Burlington Gates Person Alexander Graham Pitt Anson Granville Polk 50-59% Ashe Greene Provisions Academy** N=1 Asheboro City Guilford Raleigh Charter HS** Laurinburg Charter** Asheville City Harnett Randolph Avery Haywood Richmond Beaufort Henderson River Mill Academy** 60-69% Bladen Hertford Roanoke Rapids City N=0 Brunswick Hickory City Robeson None Buncombe Hoke Rockingham Burke Hyde Rowan-Salisbury 70-79% Cabarrus Iredell-Statesville Rutherford N=1 Caldwell Jackson Sampson J.H. Baker Jr High** Camden Johnston Scotland Carteret Kannapolis City Stanly 80-89% Caswell Kings Mountain City Stokes N=11 Catawba Lee Surry Alleghany Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Lenoir Swain Bertie Charlotte/Mecklenburg Lincoln Thomas Jefferson** Cape Lookout Marine** Chatham Macon Thomasville City Crossroads Charter** Cherokee Madison Transylvania Durham Clay Martin Tyrrell Edgecombe Cleveland McDowell Union Halifax Clinton City Mitchell Vance Jones Columbus Montgomery Wake Laurinburg Homework** Craven Moore Warren Lexington City Cumberland Mooresville City Washington Shelby City Currituck Mount Airy City Watauga Dare Nash-Rocky Mount Wayne Davidson New Hanover Weldon City Davie Newton-Conover City Whiteville City Duplin Northampton Wilkes East Wake Academy** Onslow Wilson Edenton/Chowan Orange Winston-Salem/Forsyth Elizabeth City/Pasquotank Pamlico Woods Charter** Elkin City Pender Yadkin Franklin Perquimans Yancey Gaston Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Data are rounded to the nearest whole percent for inclusion in the appropriate percent passing range category. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Table 11. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent Passing* Category for the Class of 2004, at End of Grade 12, by LEA 90% or Above N=115 30 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 State Percent Passing >=..9. 5 Magellan**, Metrolina**, Quest Academy**, Sterling Montessori** >=..9. 5 Lake Norman** >=95 Exploris** 94.5 Woods Charter** 94....0 Arapahoe Charter** 93.0 Lincoln Charter** 92.5 Ashe, Mount Airy City 92.0 Franklin Academy**, Watauga 91.5 Clay 91.0 Cherokee 90....5 Evergreen Community** 89....0 Bethany Community**, Chapel Hill-Carrboro City, Orange Charter**, Tyrrell 88.0 Alleghany, Currituck, Davie, Downtown Middle**, Greensboro Academy**, Yancey 87.5 Summit Charter** 87....0 Polk 86.0 Cabarrus, Grandfather Academy**, Onslow, Pender 85.5 Carteret, Mooresville City, Wilkes 85.0 Caldwell, Chatham, Dare, F Delany New School**, Kings Mountain City, McDowell, Transylvania, Vance Charter** 84.5 Catawba, Davidson 84.0 Moore, Person, Thomas Jefferson** 83.5 Camden, Cleveland, Clinton City, Elkin City, Henderson, Pamlico, Quality Education**, Wake 83.0 Avery, Graham, Haywood, Iredell-Statesville, Lincoln, Mitchell, Newton-Conover City, Stokes, Surry 82.5 Hyde, Johnston, Randolph, Stanly 82.0 American Ren. Middle**, C.G. Woodson**, CIS Academy**, Piedmont Community** 81.5 Alexander 81.0 Beaufort, Buncombe, Clover Garden**, Union, Wilson 80.5 Macon, Orange 80.0 Brevard Academy**, Cape Fear Center**, East Wake Academy**, Edenton/Chowan, Granville, Haliwa-Saponi Tribal**, Jackson, New Hanover 79....5 Swain 78.5 Burke, Perquimans, River Mill Academy**, Rockingham 2004 State 78.0 Hickory City, Rowan-Salisbury 77.5 Asheboro City 2003 State 77.0 Brunswick, Craven, Harnett, Rutherford, Wayne, Yadkin 2001 State 76.5 Alamance-Burlington 76.0 Gates, Martin, Nash-Rocky Mount, Richmond 75.5 Charlotte/Mecklenburg, Gaston, Sampson 75.0 Forsyth Academies**, Halifax, Lenoir, Roanoke Rapids City 74.5 Guilford, Lee 74.0 Scotland 73.5 Asheville City 73.0 Madison, Winston-Salem/Forsyth 72.5 Caswell, Elizabeth City/Pasquotank, Mountain Community** 2002 State 72.0 2000 State 71.5 Alpha Academy**, Bertie, Pitt, Rocky Mount Prep Sch** 71.0 Bladen, Greene, Montgomery 70.5 Duplin, Edgecombe, Franklin, Research Triangle** 70.0 Columbus, Cumberland 69.5 Hoke 1999 State 69.0 1998 State 68.5 Guilford Charter**, Kannapolis City, Robeson 68.0 Jones, Shelby City 67.5 Northampton 67.0 Academy of Moore County**, Durham 66.5 Weldon City 66....0 Warren 65....0 Thomasville City 64.0 Chatham Charter**, Lexington City 63.5 Anson 63....0 Kestrel Heights** 62....0 Whiteville City 61....0 Washington 60....0 Hertford 58....0 S.B. Howard** 53....0 Vance 50....0 Ann Atwater**, Bridges** 46....0 Sugar Creek** 44....0 Imani Institute** 40....0 Success Institute** 36....0 Provisions Academy** 29....0 Omuteko Gwamaziima** 28....0 SPARC Academy** 25....0 Kennedy Charter** 17....0 Carter Community**, Lakeside School** *** Crossnore Academy**, Laurinburg Homework** Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). Percent passing is rounded up to the nearest half percent. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix. ***Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Table 12. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent Passing* for the Class of 2008, at End of Grade 8, by LEA 2004 LEA Performance 31 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 State Percent Passing >=..9. 5 Raleigh Charter HS**, River Mill Academy**, Woods Charter** >=..9. 5 Franklin Academy**, Gray Stone Day** 94.0 Clover Garden** 93.5 Mount Airy City 93.0 Carteret, Elkin City, Watauga 9.2...5 Graham 91.5 Transylvania 9.1...0 Ashe, McDowell, Polk, Surry 90.0 East Wake Academy**, Lincoln Charter**, Macon, Pender 89.5 Camden 89.0 Dare 88.5 Pamlico 88.0 Johnston 87.5 Clinton City, Currituck 87.0 Clay, Onslow, Person 86.5 Catawba, Granville, Randolph, Stokes 86.0 Avery, Perquimans, Yadkin 85.5 Davie, Haywood 85.0 Kings Mountain City 84.5 Alleghany, Chapel Hill-Carrboro City, Henderson, Stanly 84.0 Alexander, Edenton/Chowan, Mooresville City, Tyrrell 83.5 Hyde, Union, Wilkes, Yancey 83.0 Cabarrus, Sampson 82.5 Brunswick, Buncombe, Cherokee, Iredell-Statesville, New Hanover, Thomas Jefferson** 82.0 Cleveland, Franklin, Jackson, Newton-Conover City 81.5 Burke, Chatham, Craven, Lincoln, Pitt 81.0 Davidson, Jones, Moore, Swain 80.5 Asheboro City, Rockingham, Rutherford 80.0 Orange, Wake 7.9...5 Lee, Martin, Nash-Rocky Mount 2004 State 78.5 Asheville City, Bladen, Caldwell, Duplin, Richmond, Roanoke Rapids City 2002 State 78.0 Columbus, Gaston, Gates, Kannapolis City, Madison 2001 State 77.5 Lenoir, Shelby City 2003 State 77.0 Beaufort, Wilson 76.5 Caswell, Harnett, Scotland 2000 State 7.6...0 Rowan-Salisbury 1999 State 7.5...0 Mitchell, Montgomery 1998 State 74.0 Charlotte/Mecklenburg, Warren 1997 State 73.5 73.0 Alamance-Burlington, Rocky Mount Prep Sch** 72.5 Wayne, Winston-Salem/Forsyth 72....0 Anson, Cumberland, Guilford 7.0...5 Hickory City, Washington 69.5 Weldon City 69.0 Elizabeth City/Pasquotank 68.5 Hoke 68.0 Greene 67.5 Durham 67.0 Edgecombe 6.6...5 Whiteville City 65.0 Ann Atwater** 6.4...5 Robeson 6.2...5 Halifax, Northampton 61.5 Vance 61.0 Bertie 60.5 Thomasville City 60.0 Kestrel Heights** 5.9...5 Lexington City 5.8...5 Crossnore Academy**, Laurinburg Homework** 5.7...5 Grandfather Academy** 5.6...5 Hertford 4.5...5 Lakeside School** 4.3...5 Cape Lookout Marine** 4.1...0 Crossroads Charter** 3.5...5 Provisions Academy** 2.9...0 Alpha Academy** 2.5...0 Laurinburg Charter** 2.2...5 C.G. Woodson** 2.1...5 Kennedy Charter** 20.0 J.H. Baker Jr High** Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). Percent passing is rounded up to the nearest half percent. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program Table 13. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent Passing* for the Class of 2007, at End of Grade 9, by LEA 2004 LEA Performance 32 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 State Percent Passing >=..9. 5 Clover Garden**, Franklin Academy**, Kestrel Heights**, Lincoln Charter**, River Mill Academy** >=..9. 5 Raleigh Charter HS** >=..9. 5 Gray Stone Day**, Pender >=95 Mount Airy City >=..9. 5 McDowell >=95 Carteret, East Wake Academy**, Granville, Transylvania, Woods Charter** >=95 Clinton City, Macon, Onslow, Polk 94.5 Ashe, Elkin City, Mooresville City 94.0 Edenton/Chowan 93.5 Cherokee, Person, Randolph 93.0 Graham, Surry 92.5 Haywood, Pamlico, Pitt, Sampson, Watauga 92.0 Asheboro City, Catawba, Chatham, Davie, Stanly 91.5 Alexander, Alleghany, Buncombe, Cabarrus, Camden, Hyde, Kannapolis City, New Hanover, Union 91.0 Avery, Craven, Currituck, Dare, Johnston 90.5 Stokes, Thomas Jefferson** 90.0 Cleveland, Lee, Lenoir 89.5 Burke, Columbus, Gates, Laurinburg Homework**, Lincoln, Martin, Rockingham 89.0 Davidson, Yadkin 88.5 Beaufort, Brunswick, Henderson, Iredell-Statesville, Rutherford, Scotland, Wilkes 2003 State 88.0 Kings Mountain City, Moore, Roanoke Rapids City 2001 State 87.5 Jackson, Perquimans, Yancey 87.0 Asheville City, Franklin, Mitchell 2000, 2004 State 86.5 Gaston, Nash-Rocky Mount, Warren 2002 State 86.0 Duplin, Elizabeth City/Pasquotank 85.5 Orange 1998 State 85.0 Alamance-Burlington, Bladen, Caldwell, Chapel Hill-Carrboro City, Madison, Wake, Weldon City 1997,1999 State 84.5 Winston-Salem/Forsyth 84.0 Greene, Jones 83.5 Clay, Harnett, Swain, Wilson 83.0 Hoke, Newton-Conover City 82.5 Charlotte/Mecklenburg, Guilford, Montgomery, Richmond 82....0 Vance 81.0 Rowan-Salisbury, Shelby City 80.5 Caswell 8.0...0 Durham, Wayne 78.5 Anson, Hickory City 78.0 Cumberland 77.5 Northampton, Washington 77.0 Edgecombe 76.5 Halifax, Lexington City, Whiteville City 7.6...0 Thomasville City 7.5...0 Robeson 74.0 Tyrrell 7.3...5 Cape Lookout Marine** 7.2...5 Bertie 7.1...0 Rocky Mount Prep Sch** 70.0 Kennedy Charter** 6.9...5 Hertford 6.4...5 Provisions Academy** 6.0...0 Lakeside School** 4.4...5 Crossroads Charter** 3.3...5 Crossnore Academy** 2.6...0 Laurinburg Charter** 2.5...0 J.H. Baker Jr High** 6....5 C.G. Woodson** *** Grandfather Academy** Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). Percent passing is rounded up to the nearest half percent. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix. ***Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Table 14. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent Passing* for the Class of 2006, at End of Grade 10, by LEA 2004 LEA Performance 33 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 State Percent Passing >=95 Gray Stone Day**, Thomas Jefferson**, Woods Charter** >=95 Raleigh Charter HS** >=95 Davie >=95 Mount Airy City, Pamlico, Person >=95 Asheboro City, Granville, Pender, Polk >=95 Alexander, Asheville City, Carteret, Chatham, Haywood, McDowell, Scotland, Wataug >=95 Clinton City, Onslow, Pitt, Surry >=95 Elkin City, Johnston, Macon, Perquimans, Randolph >=95 Cherokee, Edenton/Chowan, New Hanover, Rutherford, Weldon City, Yancey >=95 Ashe, Cabarrus, Camden, Kings Mountain City, Mooresville City, Sampson, Stokes, Transylvania 94.5 Buncombe, Catawba, Currituck, Davidson, Jackson, Martin, Richmond 94.0 Clay, Craven, Iredell-Statesville, River Mill Academy**, Yadkin 93.5 Alamance-Burlington, Brunswick, Lincoln, Newton-Conover City, Roanoke Rapids City, Stanly Swain, Tyrrell, Union 93.0 Beaufort, Cleveland, Dare, Kannapolis City, Nash-Rocky Mount, Thomasville City, Vance, Warren 92.5 Caswell, East Wake Academy**, Gates, Madison 92.0 Bladen, Halifax, Henderson, Lenoir, Mitchell, Rockingham, Wilkes 2001,2003,2004 State 91.5 Franklin, Hyde, Lee, Moore 2002 State 91.0 Charlotte/Mecklenburg, Graham, Jones, Orange 1997,1998 State 90.5 Duplin, Elizabeth City/Pasquotank, Hickory City, Winston-Salem/Forsyth 2000 State 90.0 Columbus, Hoke, Montgomery 89.5 Burke, Cape Lookout Marine**, Gaston, Greene, Wake 1999 State 89.0 Guilford, Harnett 88.5 Chapel Hill-Carrboro City, Durham 88.0 Caldwell, Lexington City, Washington 87.5 Alleghany, Avery, Edgecombe, Northampton 87.0 Rowan-Salisbury, Wilson 86.5 Robeson 85.5 Wayne 85.0 Cumberland 84.5 Lincoln Charter**, Whiteville City 83.5 Anson 81.0 Bertie 78.5 Hertford 78.0 Kennedy Charter** 77.0 Rocky Mount Prep Sch** 76.5 Laurinburg Homework** 73.0 Shelby City 57.5 J.H. Baker Jr High** 4.4...0 Crossroads Charter** 3.7...0 Laurinburg Charter** <.=..5 C.G. Woodson** *** Crossnore Academy**, Grandfather Academy**, Lakeside School**, Provisions Academy Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). Percent passing is rounded up to the nearest half percent. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix. ***Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Table 15. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent Passing* for the Class of 2005, at End of Grade 11, by LEA 2004 LEA Performance 34 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 State Percent Passing >=95 East Wake Academy**, Graham, Mount Airy City, Provisions Academy**, Raleigh Charter HS**, River Mill Academy**, Thomas Jefferson**, Woods Charter** >=95 Asheboro City, Carteret, Orange, Person >=95 Kings Mountain City, Macon, McDowell >=95 Beaufort, Granville, Haywood, Kannapolis City, Onslow, Pamlico, Pender, Pitt, Randolph, Vance >=95 Ashe, Asheville City, Chatham, Cherokee, Clay, Iredell-Statesville, Surry, Thomasville City >=95 Alamance-Burlington, Alexander, Cabarrus, Clinton City, Davie, Elkin City, Lincoln, Watauga, Wilson >=95 Buncombe, Nash-Rocky Mount, Sampson, Yancey >=95 Elizabeth City/Pasquotank, Johnston, Madison, Roanoke Rapids City, Warren >=95 Brunswick, Caswell, Jackson, Lee, Martin, New Hanover, Polk, Union >=95 Davidson, Henderson, Scotland, Stanly, Transylvania, Washington, Weldon City, Yadkin 1998,2003 State >=95 Bladen, Camden, Catawba, Columbus, Gates, Hickory City, Mooresville City, Perquimans, Rockingham, Rutherford 2001,2004 State 94.5 Avery, Chapel Hill-Carrboro City, Craven, Dare, Gaston, Hyde, Stokes 2002 State 94.0 Caldwell, Cleveland, Currituck, Hoke, Moore, Richmond 93.5 Charlotte/Mecklenburg, Newton-Conover City, Swain 1999,2000 State 93.0 Burke, Duplin, Franklin, Greene 92.5 Cumberland, Harnett, Lenoir, Wake 92.0 Edenton/Chowan, Mitchell, Montgomery, Winston-Salem/Forsyth 91.5 Rowan-Salisbury, Whiteville City, Wilkes 91.0 Guilford, Northampton 90.5 Robeson, Wayne 90.0 Anson, Hertford, Tyrrell 89.5 Durham, Edgecombe 89.0 Bertie, Lexington City 88....5 Shelby City 87.5 Jones 87....0 Alleghany 85.0 Cape Lookout Marine** 84....5 Halifax 83....0 Crossroads Charter** 82....0 Laurinburg Homework** 78....0 J.H. Baker Jr High** 53....0 Laurinburg Charter** 31....0 Crossnore Academy** *** C.G. Woodson**, Kennedy Charter**, Kestrel Heights**, Lakeside School** Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). Percent passing is rounded up to the nearest half percent. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix. ***Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Table 16. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent Passing* for the Class of 2004, at End of Grade 12, by LEA 2004 LEA Performance 35 Student Performance by Class, Ethnicity, and Gender by LEA and Region (former Technical Assistance Center Configuration) 37 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Number Passing Final Membership Percent Passing Number Passing Final Membership Percent Passing Number Passing Final Membership Percent Passing Number Passing Final Membership Percent Passing Number Passing Final Membership Percent Passing Number Passing Final Membership Percent Passing Number Passing Final Membership Percent Passing State 85,116 109,466 77.8 1,111 1,550 71.7 1,775 2,118 83.8 20,834 33,075 63.0 3,588 6,080 59.0 1,531 1,879 81.5 56,277 64,764 86.9 Western Region 6,426 7,869 81.7 82 100 82.0 42 50 84.0 319 520 61.3 175 305 57.4 100 128 78.1 5,708 6,766 84.4 Buncombe 1,694 2,098 80.7 11 14 78.6 10 16 62.5 82 138 59.4 41 85 48.2 46 56 82.1 1,504 1,789 84.1 F Delany New School** 11 13 84.6 * 0 * * 0 * * 2 * * 1 * * 0 * 9 10 90.0 Evergreen Community** 37 41 90.2 * 0 * * 1 * * 3 * * 2 * * 2 * 30 33 90.9 Asheville City 202 276 73.2 * 0 * * 1 * 68 128 53.1 7 10 70 5 7 71.4 121 130 93.1 Cherokee 259 286 90.6 * 7 * * 2 * * 7 * * 3 * * 4 * 237 263 90.1 Clay 86 94 91.5 * 0 * * 1 * * 0 * * 1 * * 1 * 83 91 91.2 Graham 77 93 82.8 9 10 90.0 * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * 68 83 81.9 Haywood 508 615 82.6 * 4 * * 2 * 5 6 83.3 9 12 75.0 2 5 40.0 487 586 83.1 Henderson 855 1,024 83.5 * 3 * 8 9 88.9 20 37 54.1 55 89 61.8 10 17 58.8 759 869 87.3 Mountain Community** 13 18 72.2 * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * 13 18 72.2 Jackson 260 325 80.0 21 27 77.8 * 0 * * 1 * 3 9 33.3 * 5 * 230 283 81.3 Summit Charter** 14 16 87.5 * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * 14 16 87.5 Macon 245 305 80.3 * 2 * * 2 * 1 5 20.0 2 10 20.0 * 3 * 236 283 83.4 Madison 143 197 72.6 * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * 3 7 42.9 * 0 * 140 190 73.7 McDowell 439 519 84.6 * 2 * * 8 * 17 23 73.9 12 21 57.1 * 4 * 398 461 86.3 Mitchell 169 204 82.8 * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * * 4 ** * 1 * 166 199 83.4 Polk 174 201 86.6 * 0 * * 0 * 14 16 87.5 8 12 66.7 * 3 * 149 170 87.6 Rutherford 636 827 76.9 * 0 * * 2 * 89 136 65.4 16 25 64.0 12 13 92.3 517 651 79.4 Thomas Jefferson** 52 62 83.9 * 0 * * 0 * * 2 * * 0 * * 1 * 51 59 86.4 Swain 124 156 79.5 24 31 77.4 * 1 * * 0 * * 4 * * 1 * 95 119 79.8 Transylvania 252 298 84.6 * 0 * 4 5 80.0 10 14 71.4 * 4 * 4 5 80.0 232 270 85.9 Brevard Academy** 4 5 80.0 * 0 * * 0 * * 1 * * 0 * * 0 * * 4 * Yancey 172 196 87.8 * 0 * * 0 * * 1 * 5 6 83.3 * 0 * 166 189 87.8 Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). *Performance data are not reported when final membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. The ethnic categories may not sum to total final membership and total number passing because ethnic category may not have been coded on some student answer sheets. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Total Multi-Racial White Table 12a. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent Passing1 for the Class of 2008, at End of Grade 8, by LEA and Ethnicity Western Region American Indian Asian Black Hispanic 39 Membership Percent Passing Membership Percent Passing Membership Percent Passing Membership Percent Passing Membership Percent Passing Membership Percent Passing Membership Percent Passing State 109,466 77.8 53,284 80.6 56,182 75.1 88,046 79.8 20,102 70.1 1,049 56.7 688 60.6 Western Region 7,869 81.7 3,727 84.3 4,142 79.3 6,615 82.1 1,095 82.4 135 62.2 21 47.6 Buncombe 2,098 80.7 1,015 83.4 1,083 78.2 2,094 80.9 0 * 0 * 4 * Asheville City 276 73.2 126 76.2 150 70.7 276 73.2 0 * 0 * 0 * F Delany New School** 13 84.6 4 * 9 88.9 10 90.0 0 * 3 * 0 * Evergreen Community** 41 90.2 12 * 29 86.2 1 * 0 * 40 92.5 0 * Cherokee 286 90.6 127 92.1 159 89.3 211 89.6 75 93.3 0 * 0 * Clay 94 91.5 42 88.1 52 94.2 94 91.5 0 * 0 * 0 * Graham 93 82.8 44 >=95 49 71.4 93 82.8 0 * 0 * 0 * Haywood 615 82.6 286 83.2 329 82.1 556 86.7 0 * 56 44.6 3 * Henderson 1,024 83.5 460 86.1 564 81.4 1,013 83.7 0 * 0 * 11 63.6 40 Mountain Community** 18 72.2 6 33.3 12 91.7 0 * 0 * 18 72.2 0 * Jackson 325 80.0 156 83.3 169 76.9 28 64.3 287 84.0 6 * 2 * Summit Charter** 16 87.5 8 * 8 75.0 16 87.5 0 * 0 * 0 * Macon 305 80.3 137 89.8 168 72.6 27 88.9 278 79.5 0 * 0 * Madison 197 72.6 92 76.1 105 69.5 197 72.6 0 * 0 * 0 * McDowell 519 84.6 260 86.2 259 83.0 519 84.6 0 * 0 * 0 * Mitchell 204 82.8 105 81.9 99 83.8 0 * 204 82.8 0 * 0 * Polk 201 86.6 106 84.9 95 88.4 201 86.6 0 * 0 * 0 * Rutherford 827 76.9 387 80.4 440 73.9 826 76.9 1 * 0 * 0 * Thomas Jefferson** 62 83.9 28 82.1 34 85.3 55 89.1 0 * 7 42.9 0 * Swain 156 79.5 76 85.5 80 73.8 0 * 156 79.5 0 * 0 * Transylvania 298 84.6 144 88.2 154 81.2 297 84.8 0 * 0 * 0 * Brevard Academy** 5 80.0 2 * 3 * 0 * 5 80.0 0 * 0 * Yancey 196 87.8 104 87.5 92 88.0 101 94.1 89 80.9 5 80.0 1 * Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). *Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. The gender categories may not sum to total membership because gender category may not have been coded on some student answer sheets. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this table. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Table 12b. 2003-04 North Carolina Competency Tests Percent Passing the Standard1 for the Class of 2008, at the End of Grade 8, by LEA, Gender, Title I, and Migrant Students Western Region Total Female Male Not Served by Title I Schoolwide Title I Program Targeted Assistance Migrant Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Number Passing Final Membership Percent Passing Number Passing Final Membership Percent Passing Number Passing Final Membership Percent Passing Number Passing Final Membership Percent Passing Number Passing Final Membership Percent Passing Number Passing Final Membership Percent Passing Number Passing Final Membership Percent Passing State 85,116 109,466 77.8 1,111 1,550 71.7 1,775 2,118 83.8 20,834 33,075 63.0 3,588 6,080 59.0 1,531 1,879 81.5 56,277 64,764 86.9 Northwest Region 13,674 16,994 80.5 22 37 59.5 358 430 83.3 1,664 2,728 61.0 568 987 57.5 214 269 79.6 10,848 12,543 86.5 Alexander 326 400 81.5 * 0 * 14 19 73.7 17 28 60.7 7 13 53.8 * 2 * 287 338 84.9 Alleghany 117 133 88.0 * 0 * * 0 * * 1 * 4 7 57.1 * 0 * 112 125 89.6 Ashe 210 228 92.1 * 2 * * 1 * * 1 * * 4 * * 2 * 201 218 92.2 Avery 125 151 82.8 * 1 * * 0 * * 0 * 3 8 37.5 * 0 * 122 142 85.9 Grandfather Academy** 6 7 85.7 * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * 6 7 85.7 Crossnore Academy** * 4 * * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * * 4 * Burke 982 1,258 78.1 * 1 * 100 119 84.0 52 85 61.2 33 58 56.9 14 18 77.8 783 977 80.1 Caldwell 870 1,025 84.9 * 0 * * 8 * 51 72 70.8 19 32 59.4 15 18 83.3 777 895 86.8 Catawba 1,141 1,355 84.2 * 3 * 79 97 81.4 59 93 63.4 38 56 67.9 24 28 85.7 939 1,078 87.1 Hickory City 297 381 78.0 * 0 * 26 32 81.3 66 101 65.3 21 38 55.3 7 13 53.8 177 197 89.8 Newton-Conover City 200 241 83.0 * 0 * 18 19 94.7 27 45 60.0 16 23 69.6 * 6 * 133 148 89.9 Davidson 1,367 1,624 84.2 5 8 62.5 7 10 70.0 35 50 70.0 28 40 70.0 9 11 81.8 1,283 1,505 85.2 Lexington City 149 233 63.9 * 1 * 13 19 68.4 61 103 59.2 17 35 48.6 * 8 * 50 67 74.6 Thomasville City 131 202 64.9 * 0 * * 0 * 60 100 60.0 15 25 60.0 4 7 57.1 52 70 74.3 Davie 432 493 87.6 * 0 * * 0 * 32 43 74.4 11 19 57.9 8 10 80.0 381 421 90.5 Winston-Salem/Forsyth 2,829 3,883 72.9 7 12 58.3 31 36 86.1 823 1,442 57.1 153 335 45.7 72 91 79.1 1,743 1,967 88.6 Quality Education** 20 24 83.3 * 0 * * 0 * 20 24 83.3 * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * Downtown Middle** 81 92 88.0 * 1 * * 0 * 44 52 84.6 * 1 * * 3 * 33 35 94.3 C.G. Woodson** 18 22 81.8 * 0 * * 0 * 17 20 85.0 * 2 * * 0 * * 0 * Forsyth Academies** 27 36 75.0 * 1 * * 0 * 10 16 62.5 * 2 * * 0 * 15 17 88.2 Iredell-Statesville 1,224 1,481 82.6 * 4 * 32 37 86.5 145 240 60.4 65 89 73.0 8 13 61.5 971 1,098 88.4 American Ren. Middle** 36 44 81.8 * 0 * * 0 * * 4 * * 1 * * 0 * 34 39 87.2 Success Institute** 2 5 40.0 * 0 * * 0 * 2 5 40.0 * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * Mooresville City 327 384 85.2 * 0 * 6 7 85.7 45 69 65.2 8 10 80.0 * 7 * 261 291 89.7 Stokes 496 599 82.8 * 1 * * 1 * 18 29 62.1 7 9 77.8 7 8 87.5 462 551 83.8 Surry 607 735 82.6 * 1 * * 3 * 14 27 51.9 39 55 70.9 * 6 * 545 643 84.8 Elkin City 84 101 83.2 * 0 * * 1 * * 4 * 8 17 47.1 * 1 * 71 78 91.0 Mount Airy City 143 155 92.3 * 0 * * 5 * 14 19 73.7 * 4 * * 0 * * 127 >=95 Watauga 345 376 91.8 * 0 * 4 5 80.0 * 4 * * 7 71.4 8 10 80.0 324 350 92.6 Wilkes 688 808 85.1 * 0 * 9 10 90.0 26 30 86.7 26 38 68.4 * 5 * 622 725 85.8 Bridges** 5 10 50.0 * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * 5 10 50.0 Yadkin 387 504 76.8 * 1 * * 1 * 16 21 76.2 34 59 57.6 * 2 * 336 420 80.0 Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). *Performance data are not reported when final membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. The ethnic categories may not sum to total final membership and total number passing because ethnic category may not have been coded on some student answer sheets. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Table 12c. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent Passing1 for the Class of 2008, at End of Grade 8, by LEA and Ethnicity Northwest Region Total American Indian Asian Black Hispanic Multi-Racial White 41 Membership Percent Passing Membership Percent Passing Membership Percent Passing Membership Percent Passing Membership Percent Passing Membership Percent Passing Membership Percent Passing State 109,466 77.8 53,284 80.6 56,182 75.1 88,046 79.8 20,102 70.1 1,049 56.7 688 60.6 Northwest Region 16,994 80.5 8,206 83.1 8,788 78.0 14,767 82.1 1,553 72.8 641 62.9 28 53.6 Alexander 400 81.5 190 82.1 210 81.0 352 87.2 0 * 48 39.6 0 * Alleghany 133 88.0 62 88.7 71 87.3 0 * 133 88.0 0 * 1 * Ashe 228 92.1 100 >=95 128 89.1 228 92.1 0 * 0 * 0 * Avery 151 82.8 62 83.9 89 82.0 0 * 151 82.8 0 * 0 * Grandfather Academy** 7 85.7 3 * 4 * 0 * 7 85.7 0 * 0 * Crossnore Academy** 4 * 3 * 1 * 0 * 4 * 0 * 0 * Burke 1,258 78.1 619 81.4 639 74.8 1,257 78.1 0 * 0 * 0 * Caldwell 1,025 84.9 505 87.7 520 82.1 504 86.7 521 83.1 0 * 0 * Catawba 1,355 84.2 669 84.6 686 83.8 1,355 84.2 0 * 0 * 0 * Hickory City 381 78.0 197 78.2 184 77.7 1 * 176 71.6 204 83.8 0 * Newton-Conover City 241 83.0 121 82.6 120 83.3 241 83.0 0 * 0 * 0 * Davidson 1,624 84.2 801 87.0 823 81.4 1,624 84.2 0 * 0 * 0 * 42 Lexington City 233 63.9 109 67.0 124 61.3 0 * 233 63.9 0 * 0 * Thomasville City 202 64.9 105 65.7 97 63.9 202 64.9 0 * 0 * 0 * Davie 493 87.6 252 87.7 241 87.6 478 89.1 0 * 15 40.0 0 * Winston-Salem/Forsyth 3,883 72.9 1,860 75.6 2,023 70.3 3,307 77.0 250 43.2 324 54.0 0 * Quality Education** 24 83.3 8 * 16 75.0 0 * 24 83.3 0 * 0 * Downtown Middle** 92 88.0 41 90.2 51 86.3 88 90.9 0 * 4 * 0 * C.G. Woodson** 22 81.8 13 92.3 9 66.7 0 * 0 * 22 81.8 0 * Forsyth Academies** 36 75.0 23 78.3 13 69.2 22 81.8 0 * 14 64.3 0 * Iredell-Statesville 1,481 82.6 665 86.9 816 79.2 1,474 82.9 6 16.7 0 * 1 * American Ren. Middle** 44 81.8 21 76.2 23 87.0 44 81.8 0 * 0 * 0 * Success Institute** 5 40.0 2 * 3 * 0 * 0 * 5 40.0 0 * Mooresville City 384 85.2 211 89.1 173 80.3 384 85.2 0 * 0 * 0 * Stokes 599 82.8 268 86.6 331 79.8 599 82.8 0 * 0 * 0 * Surry 735 82.6 327 89.9 408 76.7 726 82.8 4 * 0 * 4 * Elkin City 101 83.2 54 83.3 47 83.0 101 83.2 0 * 0 * 0 * Mount Airy City 155 92.3 74 93.2 81 91.4 155 92.3 0 * 0 * 0 * Watauga 376 91.8 166 92.8 210 91.0 331 92.1 44 88.6 1 * 0 * Wilkes 808 85.1 407 87.7 401 82.5 791 85.6 0 * 0 * 17 64.7 Bridges** 10 50.0 5 60.0 5 40.0 10 50.0 0 * 0 * 0 * Yadkin 504 76.8 263 80.6 241 72.6 493 77.9 0 * 4 * 5 40.0 Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). *Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. The gender categories may not sum to total membership because gender category may not have been coded on some student answer sheets. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this table. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Table 12d. 2003-04 North Carolina Competency Tests Percent Passing the Standard1 for the Class of 2008, at the End of Grade 8, by LEA, Gender, Title I, and Migrant Students Northwest Region Total Female Male Not Served by Title I Schoolwide Title I Program Targeted Assistance Migrant Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Number Passing Final Membership Percent Passing Number Passing Final Membership Percent Passing Number Passing Final Membership Percent Passing Number Passing Final Membership Percent Passing Number Passing Final Membership Percent Passing Number Passing Final Membership Percent Passing Number Passing Final Membership Percent Passing State 85,116 109,466 77.8 1,111 1,550 71.7 1,775 2,118 83.8 20,834 33,075 63.0 3,588 6,080 59.0 1,531 1,879 81.5 56,277 64,764 86.9 Southwest Region 18,965 24,434 77.6 169 246 68.7 478 570 83.9 4,816 7,746 62.2 879 1,445 60.8 232 274 84.7 12,391 14,153 87.6 Anson 214 337 63.5 * 0 * 4 6 66.7 107 209 51.2 * 1 * * 0 * 103 121 85.1 Cabarrus 1,531 1,782 85.9 9 10 90.0 * 21 >=95 188 276 68.1 80 127 63.0 24 27 88.9 1,210 1,321 91.6 Kannapolis City 253 371 68.2 * 1 * * 4 * 54 110 49.1 23 40 57.5 9 10 90.0 164 206 79.6 Cleveland 635 763 83.2 * 1 * * 3 * 141 187 75.4 9 13 69.2 10 11 90.9 472 548 86.1 Kings Mountain City 349 411 84.9 * 0 * * 8 * 71 99 71.7 4 5 80.0 * 9 * 257 290 88.6 Shelby City 176 259 68.0 * 0 * * 0 * 91 154 59.1 * 2 * * 3 * 83 100 83.0 Gaston 1,970 2,609 75.5 6 7 85.7 40 44 90.9 302 520 58.1 61 110 55.5 15 22 68.2 1,546 1,906 81.1 Piedmont Community** 18 22 81.8 * 0 * * 0 * * 1 * * 2 * * 0 * 17 19 89.5 Hoke 355 512 69.3 42 70 60.0 * 0 * 167 256 65.2 17 33 51.5 12 14 85.7 117 139 84.2 Lincoln 763 920 82.9 * 2 * * 2 * 65 92 70.7 41 58 70.7 10 12 83.3 643 754 85.3 Lincoln Charter** 38 41 92.7 * 1 * * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * * 1 * 36 39 92.3 Charlotte/Mecklenburg 6,581 8,731 75.4 28 38 73.7 313 373 83.9 2,507 4,000 62.7 405 692 58.5 57 65 87.7 3,271 3,563 91.8 Kennedy Charter** 3 12 25.0 * 0 * * 0 * 3 11 27.3 * 1 * * 0 * * 0 * Lake Norman** * 148 >=95 * 0 * * 4 * 6 7 85.7 * 0 * * 1 * * 136 >=95 Sugar Creek** 22 48 45.8 * 0 * * 2 * 19 44 43.2 * 0 * * 0 * * 2 * Metrolina** * 12 * * 0 * * 2 * * 1 * * 0 * * 0 * * 9 * Montgomery 258 365 70.7 * 2 * * 9 * 54 100 54.0 32 48 66.7 * 4 * 159 202 78.7 Moore 861 1,025 84.0 10 13 76.9 * 4 * 168 243 69.1 39 52 75.0 15 18 83.3 626 695 90.1 Academy of Moore County** 20 30 66.7 * 0 * * 0 * 6 9 66.7 * 0 * * 1 * 14 20 70.0 Richmond 502 663 75.7 17 23 73.9 4 5 80.0 163 270 60.4 18 19 94.7 * 8 * 292 338 86.4 Rowan-Salisbury 1,361 1,754 77.6 6 9 66.7 12 20 60.0 226 376 60.1 47 73 64.4 18 22 81.8 1,052 1,254 83.9 Scotland 402 546 73.6 38 58 65.5 6 7 85.7 145 232 62.5 * 3 * 7 9 77.8 204 237 86.1 Laurinburg Homework** * 4 * * 2 * * 0 * * 2 * * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * Stanly 691 842 82.1 * 0 * 28 37 75.7 86 123 69.9 15 21 71.4 9 13 69.2 553 648 85.3 Union 1,804 2,227 81.0 7 9 77.8 16 19 84.2 246 424 58 84 145 57.9 22 24 91.7 1,429 1,606 89.0 Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). *Performance data are not reported when final membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. The ethnic categories may not sum to total final membership and total number passing because ethnic category may not have been coded on some student answer sheets. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in
Object Description
Description
Title | Report of student performance on the North Carolina competency standard |
Date | 2005-03 |
Description | 2003/2004 |
Digital Characteristics-A | 2 MB; 123 p. |
Digital Format | application/pdf |
Full Text | Public Schools of North Carolina State Board of Education Department of Public Instruction Accountability Services/Test Development Section Raleigh NC 27601-2825 www.ncpublicschools.org/accountability/testing Reporting on the Classes of 2000 - 2008 Published March 2005 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard 2003-04 STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION HOWARD N. LEE Chairman Raleigh JANE P. NORWOOD Vice Chair Charlotte KATHY A. TAFT Greenville MICHELLE HOWARD-VITAL Wilmington EDGAR D. MURPHY Durham EVELYN B. MONROE West End MARIA T. PALMER Chapel Hill ROBERT “TOM” SPEED Boone WAYNE MCDEVITT Asheville JOHN TATE III Charlotte BEVERLY PERDUE Lieutenant Governor New Bern RICHARD MOORE State Treasurer Kittrell NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION Patricia N. Willoughby, State Superintendent 301 N. Wilmington Street :: Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2825 :: www.ncpublicschools.org In compliance with federal laws, N C Public Schools administers all state-operated educational programs, employment activities and admissions without discrimination because of race, religion, national or ethnic orgin, color, age, military service, disability, or gender, except where exemption is appropriate and allowed by law. Inquiries or complaints should be directed to: Dr. Elsie C. Leak, Associate Superintendent Office of Curriculum and School Reform Services 6307 Mail Services Center Raleigh, NC 27699-6307 Telephone (919) 807-3761; fax (919) 807-3767 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard 2003-04 March 2005 Public Schools of North Carolina State Board of Education Department of Public Education Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program Raleigh NC 27601-2825 www.ncpublicschools.org/accountability/testing Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Acknowledgments This report is the collaborative work of many individuals. The North Carolina Testing Program is conducted by the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction (NCDPI), Division of Accountability Services. Technical support services for the program are implemented in collaboration with the Center for Urban Affairs and Community Services at North Carolina State University under the Technical Outreach for Public Schools (TOPS) program. Mildred Bazemore, Chief of the North Carolina Test Development Section, and Charles Lanier, Educational Research and Evaluation Consultant in the North Carolina Test Development Section, directed the design of the report. Staff at TOPS conducted the required analyses and report production. At TOPS we thank Alissa Bernholc, Betty Marsh, Stephen Ward, Anthony Wells, and Karin Wolfe for assistance in creating tables and figures, verifying data accuracy, and coordinating report editing and production. At DPI, we thank Mildred Bazemore and Charles Lanier for assistance in preparing all phases of this publication. We also thank the personnel in the state’s Regional Accountability Centers and Local Education Agencies for their conscientious efforts in administering the tests and verifying the data. This publication and the information contained within must not be used for personal or financial gain. North Carolina LEA school officials and teachers, parents, and students may download and duplicate this publication for instructional and educational purposes only. Others may not duplicate this publication without prior written permission from the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction (NCDPI) Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. © 2005 All rights reserved. This document may not be reproduced by any means, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction, Division of Accountability Services, North Carolina Test Development Section, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27601-2825. Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Summary Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Historical Background • North Carolina’s belief that all children can learn is consistent with the requirement that all students must be provided academic challenges in order to ensure that every child has an opportunity to realize his or her potential. Consistent with this belief has been an assessment requirement to measure what students know and are able to do as graduates of North Carolina public schools. To assure that students possess the knowledge and skills necessary to function independently and successfully in assuming the responsibilities of citizenship, North Carolina has required students to meet a graduation testing standard since 1978 for the class of 1981. Initially the competency testing program focused on competencies that students need to possess as a minimum in the areas of reading, mathematics, and grammar in order to graduate from high school. In 1985-86, the program was expanded to include a minimum skills writing component which was eliminated 1988-89. Effective with the graduates of 1998, students were expected to meet a higher standard in reading and mathematics. The results in this report focus on student performance on the higher standard. • Note: The State Board of Education approved revisions to the North Carolina Mathematics Standard Course of Study at the May 1998 monthly meeting. Effective with the 2000-01 school year, North Carolina mathematics tests measure the goals and objectives from the 1998 curriculum. Prior to the 1998 revision, the state mathematics curriculum had been revised in 1989 (grades K-8) and 1992 (grades 9-12). Due to the 1998 revisions in the mathematics curriculum and the revised tests, the mathematics developmental scale scores were revised for the grade 3 pretest and end-of-grade tests. The revised mathematics developmental scale scores adopted by the State Board of Education in September 2001 are used to report student performance in this publication beginning with 2000-01 data. Any mathematics scales reported prior to the 2000-01 school year are not to be compared without using the conversion tables published September 2001. The end-of-course mathematics tests (Algebra I, Algebra II, and Geometry) retained the scale previously used. Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Background • The class of 1998 was the first class required by State Board of Education policy to meet a higher competency standard in the areas of reading and mathematics in order to receive a high school diploma. The students graduating at the end of the 1997-98 school year were required to demonstrate grade-level proficiency (Achievement Level III or IV) on the eighth-grade reading and mathematics tests, the competency tests, or other approved screens. • Data used to compile this report were provided by the LEAs from the Student Information Management System (SIMS) and Masterbuild data files. The data files were generated using test results from students up to July 15, 2004. Key Findings • The percentage of students passing the competency standard increases with each grade although the number of students in membership generally decreases as students progress through the grades. Of eighth-graders, 77.8 percent passed the standard in the 2003-04 school year, while 78.1 percent of ninth graders, 86.1 percent of tenth graders, 91.4 percent of eleventh graders, and 94.1 percent of twelfth-graders met the requirement. • There are fewer differences in percent passing by ethnicity at grade 12 with better than 88.6 percent of all subgroups passing. At the end of grade 8, however, students in the Hispanic, Black, and American Indian subgroups pass at a lower rate than students in the White, Asian, and Multi-Racial subgroups. This pattern holds for the classes of 2006 and 2007 with between 30.9 percent and 51.3 percent of Hispanic, Black, and American Indian students not passing the competency standard by the end of grade 9. Report of Student Performance on the Competency Standard, 2003-04 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Table of Contents Introduction.....................................................................................................................i Background and Findings ................................................................................................ii Statewide Number of Students Tested and Number Not Tested by Grade......................1 Percent Passing by Class..................................................................................................6 Percent Passing by Ethnicity and Class ...........................................................................10 Performance of Exceptional, Limited English Proficient, and Title I Students, Across Grades 8-12........................................................................................................ 15 Performance of Students with Disabilities, Grades 8-12 ............................................... 16 Performance of Limited English Proficient Students, Grades 8-12............................... 19 Percent of LEAs and Charter Schools in Each Percent Passing Category by Class...... 20 Student Performance by Class, Ethnicity, and Gender, by LEA and Region................ 37 Sample Questions for the North Carolina Competency Tests ....................................... 101 Answers to Sample Tests and Notes.............................................................................. 109 Appendix....................................................................................................................... 111 List of North Carolina Charter Schools, 2003-04..................................................... 113 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Introduction The Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard provides information on student performance at the state, regional, and school system levels for students in the classes of 2000-2008. The data used to compile this report were provided by each LEA represented and are managed at the school and school system levels. The data were collected using a variety of strategies including analyzing electronically scored data files and reviewing masterbuild files. LEA test coordinators submitted the data from each LEA for this report to the NCDPI, and Regional Accountability Coordinators approved the data represented in this report. The requirement for graduates of 1998 or beyond represents a more rigorous standard than the minimum competency requirement implemented initially in 1978 for the class of 1981. The more recent standard implemented by the State Board of Education in 1995 requires students to demonstrate mastery of grade-level competencies in reading and mathematics equivalent to grade 8 as described in the North Carolina Standard Course of Study. In order to demonstrate the requirement, a student must achieve performance equivalent to Achievement Level III or above beginning with the North Carolina End-of- Grade Tests in Reading and Mathematics administered at the end of grade 8 and a State Board of Education alternative (screen). Students who fail the initial screen at grade 8 must be given at least one opportunity to pass the test(s) beginning as early as the summer after grade 8 and each year thereafter until the standard is met. LEAs are permitted to administer the competency tests in the summer, fall, and spring of each year (and during the last month of school for seniors only). Students are required to retake only the tests they do not pass. According to legislation and State Board of Education policy, any students who fail to pass the competency standard by the end of the ninth grade are given focused remedial instruction and additional opportunities to take the test(s) up to and including the last month of the twelfth grade. In addition, students who have failed to pass the competency standard by the end of the last school month of the year in which the students’ class graduates, may receive additional remedial instruction and continue to take the competency tests during regularly scheduled testing sessions until the students reach maximum school age (21). The purpose of this document is to report the performance of students in the classes of 2000-2008 on the more rigorous competency standard as of the 2003-04 school year. Previously published Reports of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard displayed LEA level data in the pie chart series in this report; beginning in 2002-03, charter school data are also included. A PDF version of this report is available at http://www.ncpublicschools.org/accountability/testing/reports. i Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Background and Findings Background • North Carolina General Statute 115C-174.11 mandates that the State Board of Education adopt tests or other measurement instruments which may be used to assure that graduates of the public high schools, and graduates of non-public high schools supervised by the State Board of Education, possess the skills and knowledge necessary to function independently and successfully in assuming the responsibilities of citizenship. Graduation Proficiency Guidelines • At its February 1995 meeting, the State Board of Education approved Grade-Level Proficiency Guidelines and Graduation Proficiency Guidelines that include replacing the less stringent 1978 North Carolina competency standard with more rigorous standards in reading and mathematics as measured by North Carolina End-of-Grade (EOG) Tests. The Current Standard • Beginning in 1994-95 with ninth graders, the higher standard requires students to demonstrate grade eight proficiency by performing at Achievement Level III or above on the reading and mathematics competency tests in order to receive a North Carolina high school diploma. Competency Requirement Guidelines • The competency requirement guidelines, as indicated in SBE policies HSP-C-016 and HSP-N-000, were revised in 1999. These policies include establishing Achievement Level III or above as the standard for grades 3 through 8, and “grade-level standards at the end of the year” for grades K through 2, respectively. Furthermore, intervention/remediation is required for students not meeting the standard. Regulations Governing the Competency Tests • Regulations concerning the competency requirement have not changed although the tests have been replaced effective with the class of 1998. With regard to the competency requirements, LEAs are legally required to: • test students beginning no later than grade 9, (which was changed from grade 10), effective with the passage of Senate Bill 1125 for the 1997-98 school year; • offer remedial instructional opportunities to students not meeting the requirement; • provide additional opportunities for students to retake the tests at least one time, up to three times, per year; and, • provide seniors with an additional opportunity to retake the tests during the last month of school. ii Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Cut Scores for the Competency Tests • The Achievement Level III or above standard requires a student to take the grade 8 end-of-grade tests in reading and mathematics or equivalent tests given as competency tests at the high school level. • The Achievement Level III performance on the 2003-04 EOG reading tests is scale scores at or above 254. • The Achievement Level III performance on the 2003-04 EOG mathematics tests is scale scores at or above 261. • No standard error of the mean is considered when determining whether students meet the competency standard for reading or mathematics. • The mathematics operational test was implemented in 2000-01; therefore, the mathematics cutoff scores for students who entered the eighth grade in 2000-01 were revised. Similarly, the reading cutoff scores were revised for students who entered the eighth grade in 2003-04. • The cutoff scores for students who entered the eighth grade in 1993-94 through 1999-00 are: Reading: at or above a scale score of 156, Mathematics: at or above a scale score of 165. • The cutoff scores for students who entered the eighth grade in 2000-01 are: Reading: at or above a scale score of 156, Mathematics: at or above a scale score of 256. • The cutoff scores for students who entered the eighth grade in 2001-02 are: Reading: at or above a scale score of 156, Mathematics: at or above a scale score of 261. • The cutoff scores for students who entered the eighth grade in 2002-03 are: Reading: at or above a scale score of 254, Mathematics: at or above a scale score of 261. iii Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Cut Scores for the Competency Tests (continued) • The cutoff scores for students who entered the eighth grade in 2003-04 are: Reading: at or above a scale score of 254, Mathematics: at or above a scale score of 261. Test Administrations • Students who do not achieve the above scores have not met the competency standard. • LEAs may schedule as many as three test administrations each school year: once in the summer, once in the fall (must accommodate seniors graduating in December), and once in the spring (must accommodate seniors). • LEAs may schedule up to four test administrations per year for seniors: summer prior to grade 12, fall, spring, and last month. • Each student who has failed to meet the requirement must be given at least one opportunity each year (beginning in grade nine) to retake the test(s) though LEAs may elect to give students an opportunity to retake the tests during each cycle. • Accommodations are available for students with disabilities or students who are identified as limited English proficient. • Different equivalent forms of the tests are rotated for each of the scheduled test administrations. Screening on Other Measures to Permit Students to Satisfy the Competency Standard • If a student has scores from the grade 8 North Carolina EOG reading comprehension and mathematics tests, the scores must be used to determine whether the student has met the competency requirements. If for some reason a student does not have such scores, other screening(s) may occur. The screenings described below are approved to be used for students who transfer into the North Carolina system after grade 8. Nationally- Normed Tests • Scores from a standardized, nationally-normed test, normed on a sample representative of the public school population in 1992 or later, may be used for competency screening. Scores from grade 8 or higher are preferred. The cut scores for screening for these tests are: • Reading or verbal: at or above the 50th national percentile. • Mathematics or quantitative: at or above the 50th national percentile. iv Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 PSAT or SAT • The following PSAT or SAT scores may be used for competency screening: o Reading or verbal: at or above a verbal score of 40 on the PSAT, 400 on the SAT (48 and 480 on the recentered scale). o Mathematics or quantitative: at or above a mathematics score of 45 on the PSAT and 450 on the SAT (48 and 480 on the recentered scale). Seventh Grade End-of-Grade Tests • In the event that North Carolina EOG scores, scores from nationally-normed tests, and scores from the PSAT or SAT are not available, seventh-grade EOG scores may, as a last resort, be used for screening purposes. Acceptable scores are the same as for grade 8. • The cut scores for students who entered the eighth grade in 1993-94 through 1999-00 are: Reading: at or above a scale score of 156, Mathematics: at or above a scale score of 165. • The cut scores for students who entered the eighth grade in 2000-01 are: Reading: at or above a scale score of 156, Mathematics: at or above a scale score of 256. • The cut scores for students who entered the eighth grade in 2001-02 are: Reading: at or above a scale score of 156, Mathematics: at or above a scale score of 261. • The cut scores for students who entered the eighth grade in 2002-03 are: Reading: at or above a scale score of 254, Mathematics: at or above a scale score of 261. • The cut scores for students who entered the eighth grade in 2003-04 are: Reading: at or above a scale score of 254, Mathematics: at or above a scale score of 261. v Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Strategies and Interventions Implemented to Increase Performance • The North Carolina Department of Public Instruction (NCDPI) has provided a North Carolina Competency Resource Guide that provides information to educators working to provide remedial instruction to students who have failed the tests. • Competency student handbooks have been provided to LEAs for students to use to get an understanding of what the tests are like and to provide information about the requirement. • Resources such as sample items and test information sheets and training on how to use the competency resource guidebook have been made available to LEAs. • Sample grade 8 reading and mathematics test items are available on the NCDPI/Testing Program website: www.ncpublicschools.org/accountability/testing/eog Data Verification • The LEAs provided the NCDPI with a pass/fail flag for each student enrolled by submitting a “masterbuild” file in the spring of 2004. LEAs exclude visiting, transfer, and foreign-exchange students based on an NCDPI directive. Data Sources • Since data became available for the 2000-01 school year, some required reporting variables were added by merging the “masterbuild” file with other testing files where the required variables had been collected. For 2003-04, the merge included grade 8 end-of-grade data from 2000-01 through 2003-04 and all end-of-course files from 2000-01 through 2003-04. Information from the other testing files was only applied to a student record when the student’s last name, identification number, and gender were identical; therefore, information was not obtained for students where name or identification number changed or was miscoded. Also, duplicates, when found, were removed to reflect the most recent complete data. State Results by Ethnicity for Eighth Grade • The eighth grade end-of-grade tests in reading and mathematics provide the first opportunity for students to meet the competency requirement. During the 2003-04 school year, 77.8 percent of eighth-grade students in North Carolina met the standard. • Results by ethnicity for eighth graders varied with the White student subgroup having the highest percent of students passing and the Hispanic student subgroup having the lowest percent of students passing. The percents passing for each subgroup were: 59.0 percent Hispanic, 63.0 percent Black, 71.7 percent American Indian, 81.5 percent Multi-Racial, 83.8 percent Asian, and 86.9 vi Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 percent White. State Results by Ethnicity for Ninth Grade • Students who have not met the eighth-grade proficiency or screen are required to take the North Carolina Competency Test of Reading and Mathematics as one requirement for a North Carolina high school diploma. According to legislation, all students who have not achieved a passing score must be provided the opportunity to take the competency tests in the ninth grade. In 2003-04, 78.1 percent of the students passed the competency requirement by the end of the ninth grade. Results by ethnicity varied with Hispanic students having the lowest percent passing and White students have the highest percent passing by the end of the ninth grade. • Approximately 52.9 percent Hispanic, 65.2 percent Black, 69.1 percent American Indian, 79.8 percent Asian, 81.7 percent Multi- Racial, and 87.6 percent White students passed the competency requirement by the end of the ninth grade. State Results by Ethnicity for Tenth Grade • During the 2003-04 school year, approximately 86.1 percent of the students passed the requirement by the end of the tenth grade. • When viewing the results by ethnic group, a difference continues to exist among the subgroups. The percents passing for each subgroup by the end of tenth grade were: 66.8 percent Hispanic, 76.2 percent Black, 79.6 percent American Indian, 83.4 percent Asian students, 86.9 percent Multi-Racial, and 92.4 percent White. State Results by Ethnicity for Eleventh Grade • For the 2003-04 school year, approximately 91.4 percent of students passed the competency standard by the end of eleventh grade. The largest difference exists between the Hispanic subgroup and the White subgroup. Approximately 79.1 percent of Hispanic students passed the requirement while 94.9 percent of White students passed the requirement by the end of the eleventh grade. • The percents passing for each subgroup were: 79.1 percent Hispanic, 85.4 percent Black, 87.0 percent Asian, 89.8 percent American Indian, 89.1 percent Multi-Racial, and 94.9 percent White. State Results by Ethnicity for Twelfth Grade • For the 2003-04 school year, approximately 94.1 percent of students passed the competency tests in twelfth grade. Results by ethnicity varied with Hispanic and Black students having the lowest percents passing and White students having the highest percent passing by the end of the twelfth grade. vii Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 State Reslults by Ethnicity for Twelfth Grade (continued) Performance of Students with Disabilities Performance of Students Identified as Limited English Proficient • The percents passing for each subgroup were: 88.6 percent Hispanic, 89.7 percent Black, 93.1 percent Asian, 93.1 percent American Indian, 94.5 percent Multi-Racial, and greater than or equal to 95.0 percent White. • For the 2003-04 school year, 41.4 percent of the 16,982 eighth-grade students with disabilities (including students identified only under Section 504) met the competency standard. Also for students with disabilities, 54.1 percent of 13,291 ninth-grade students, 55.7 percent of 11,373 tenth-grade students, 76.9 percent of 6,313 eleventh-grade students, and 69.3 percent of 6,784 twelfth-grade students passed. • For students identified as limited English proficient, 37.5 percent of 3,265 students in grade 8 met the competency standard in 2003-04. For the other grades, 68.1 percent of 2,406 students at grade 9; 46.2 percent of 2,132 students at grade 10; 56.6 percent of 244 students at grade 11; and 80.4 percent of 1,188 students at grade 12, met the competency standard in 2003-04. viii Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Membership1 N Tested2 % Tested % Proficient All Students 109,466 105,355 96.2 77.8 4,111 3.8 Female 53,284 51,717 97.1 80.6 1,567 2.9 Male 56,182 53,638 95.5 75.1 2,544 4.5 American Indian 1,550 1,464 94.5 71.7 86 5.5 Asian 2,118 1,998 94.3 83.8 120 5.7 Black 33,075 31,653 95.7 63.0 1,422 4.3 Hispanic 6,080 5,335 87.7 59.0 745 12.3 Multi-Racial 1,879 1,803 96.0 81.5 76 4.0 White 64,764 63,102 97.4 86.9 1,662 2.6 Title I 21,359 20,191 94.5 69.3 1,168 5.5 Schoolwide Title I 20,102 19,005 94.5 70.1 1,097 5.5 Targeted Assistance Title I 1,049 1,015 96.8 56.7 34 3.2 Not Title I 88,046 85,141 96.7 79.8 2,905 3.3 Migrant 688 604 87.8 60.6 84 12.2 Not Migrant 108,717 104,728 96.3 77.9 3,989 3.7 Free/Reduced Lunch 44,413 42,486 95.7 64.7 1,927 4.3 Not Free/Reduced Lunch 65,053 62,869 96.6 86.7 2,184 3.4 Limited English Proficient 3,265 2,576 78.9 37.5 689 21.1 Not Limited English Proficient 106,201 102,779 96.8 79.0 3,422 3.2 Students With Disabilities 16,982 15,004 88.4 41.4 1,978 11.6 Students Without Disabilities 92,484 90,351 97.7 84.4 2,133 2.3 Students With IEPs 14,996 13,031 86.9 37.2 1,965 13.1 Students Without IEPs 94,470 92,324 97.7 84.2 2,146 2.3 Behaviorally-Emotionally Disabled 1,382 1,251 90.5 27.4 131 9.5 Hearing Impaired 122 107 87.7 47.5 15 12.3 Educable Mentally Disabled 2,657 1,961 73.8 <=5% 696 26.2 Specific Learning Disabled 7,297 7,014 96.1 50.9 283 3.9 Speech-Language Impaired 195 190 97.4 55.9 5 2.6 Visually Impaired 56 49 87.5 62.5 7 12.5 Other Health Impaired 2,368 2,196 92.7 44.7 172 7.3 Orthopedically Impaired 62 46 74.2 45.2 16 25.8 Traumatic Brain Injury 67 52 77.6 34.3 15 22.4 Autistic 316 129 40.8 22.8 187 59.2 Severely/Profoundly Mentally Disabled 62 3 4.8 * 59 95.2 Multihandicapped 124 12 9.7 * 112 90.3 Deaf-Blind 19 12 63.2 47.4 7 36.8 Trainable Mentally Disabled 269 9 3.3 * 260 96.7 Section 504 1,986 1,973 99.3 73.3 13 0.7 Notes: 1"Membership" is the total number of students on the 2003-04 Masterbuild data file. *Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. These data represent coding on the 2003-04 test documents. % Absent/ Other 2"N Tested" represents the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Table 1. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Statewide Number of Students Tested and Number Not Tested, Grade 8 Category Not Tested N Absent/ Other 1 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Membership1 N Tested2 % Tested % Proficient All Students 119,403 111,982 93.8 78.1 7,421 6.2 Female 57,796 54,708 94.7 81.3 3,088 5.3 Male 61,607 57,274 93.0 75.0 4,333 7.0 American Indian 1,816 1,668 91.9 69.1 148 8.1 Asian 2,324 2,132 91.7 79.8 192 8.3 Black 37,228 34,263 92.0 65.2 2,965 8.0 Hispanic 7,053 5,795 82.2 52.9 1,258 17.8 Multi-Racial 1,829 1,703 93.1 81.7 126 6.9 White 69,153 66,421 96.0 87.6 2,732 4.0 Title I 1,426 1,270 89.1 50.4 156 10.9 Schoolwide Title I 879 779 88.6 55.2 100 11.4 Targeted Assistance Title I 353 315 89.2 42.8 38 10.8 Not Title I 109,098 104,806 96.1 82.4 4,292 3.9 Migrant 210 192 91.4 44.3 18 8.6 Not Migrant 110,314 105,884 96.0 82.1 4,430 4.0 Free/Reduced Lunch** Not Free/Reduced Lunch** Limited English Proficient 2,406 2,188 90.9 68.1 218 9.1 Not Limited English Proficient 116,997 109,794 93.8 78.3 7,203 6.2 Students With Disabilities 13,291 12,439 93.6 54.1 852 6.4 Students Without Disabilities 106,112 99,543 93.8 81.0 6,569 6.2 Students With IEPs 11,750 10,929 93.0 50.3 821 7.0 Students Without IEPs 107,653 101,053 93.9 81.1 6,600 6.1 Behaviorally-Emotionally Disabled 1,254 1,111 88.6 35.9 143 11.4 Hearing Impaired 111 106 95.5 58.6 5 4.5 Educable Mentally Disabled 1,048 867 82.7 12.9 181 17.3 Specific Learning Disabled 6,886 6,600 95.8 56.8 286 4.2 Speech-Language Impaired 115 107 93.0 53.9 8 7.0 Visually Impaired 62 58 93.5 69.4 4 6.5 Other Health Impaired 1,914 1,808 94.5 56.8 106 5.5 Orthopedically Impaired 40 38 95.0 62.5 2 5.0 Traumatic Brain Injury 40 37 92.5 40.0 3 7.5 Autistic 118 87 73.7 54.2 31 26.3 Severely/Profoundly Mentally Disabled 13 2 15.4 * 11 84.6 Multihandicapped 17 8 47.1 11.8 9 52.9 Deaf-Blind 101 94 93.1 44.6 7 6.9 Trainable Mentally Disabled 31 6 19.4 16.1 25 80.6 Section 504 1,541 1,510 98.0 83.4 31 2.0 Notes: 1"Membership" is the total number of students on the 2003-04 Masterbuild data file. *Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. **Free/ Reduced Lunch information is not collected for grades 9 and 11. These data represent coding on the 2003-04 test documents. % Absent/ Other 2"N Tested" represents the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Table 2. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Statewide Number of Students Tested and Number Not Tested, Grade 9 Category Not Tested N Absent/ Other 2 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Membership1 N Tested2 % Tested % Proficient All Students 97,211 92,214 94.9 86.1 4,997 5.1 Female 48,666 46,440 95.4 88.0 2,226 4.6 Male 48,545 45,774 94.3 84.2 2,771 5.7 American Indian 1,283 1,202 93.7 79.6 81 6.3 Asian 2,041 1,886 92.4 83.4 155 7.6 Black 28,103 25,976 92.4 76.2 2,127 7.6 Hispanic 4,482 3,985 88.9 66.8 497 11.1 Multi-Racial 1,339 1,253 93.6 86.9 86 6.4 White 59,963 57,912 96.6 92.4 2,051 3.4 Title I 961 816 84.9 59.8 145 15.1 Schoolwide Title I 634 520 82.0 60.7 114 18.0 Targeted Assistance Title I 192 172 89.6 62.5 20 10.4 Not Title I 94,546 89,988 95.2 86.8 4,558 4.8 Migrant 141 130 92.2 52.5 11 7.8 Not Migrant 95,366 90,674 95.1 86.6 4,692 4.9 Free/Reduced Lunch 26,982 25,092 93.0 77.2 1,890 7.0 Not Free/Reduced Lunch 70,229 67,122 95.6 89.5 3,107 4.4 Limited English Proficient 2,132 1,853 86.9 46.2 279 13.1 Not Limited English Proficient 95,079 90,361 95.0 87.0 4,718 5.0 Students With Disabilities 11,373 9,533 83.8 55.7 1,840 16.2 Students Without Disabilities 85,838 82,681 96.3 90.1 3,157 3.7 Students With IEPs 9,982 8,164 81.8 51.3 1,818 18.2 Students Without IEPs 87,229 84,050 96.4 90.1 3,179 3.6 Behaviorally-Emotionally Disabled 753 636 84.5 44.1 117 15.5 Hearing Impaired 128 106 82.8 53.1 22 17.2 Educable Mentally Disabled 1,596 826 51.8 7.6 770 48.2 Specific Learning Disabled 5,433 5,090 93.7 65.3 343 6.3 Speech-Language Impaired 82 75 91.5 65.9 7 8.5 Visually Impaired 50 44 88.0 70.0 6 12.0 Other Health Impaired 1,397 1,230 88.0 61.8 167 12.0 Orthopedically Impaired 57 48 84.2 54.4 9 15.8 Traumatic Brain Injury 30 20 66.7 46.7 10 33.3 Autistic 139 62 44.6 31.7 77 55.4 Severely/Profoundly Mentally Disabled 38 2 5.3 * 36 94.7 Multihandicapped 70 8 11.4 * 62 88.6 Deaf-Blind 10 5 50.0 30.0 5 50.0 Trainable Mentally Disabled 199 12 6.0 * 187 94.0 Section 504 1,391 1,369 98.4 87.5 22 1.6 Notes: 1"Membership" is the total number of students on the 2003-04 Masterbuild data file. *Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. These data represent coding on the 2003-04 test documents. 2"N Tested" represents the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Table 3. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Statewide Number of Students Tested and Number Not Tested, Grade 10 Category Not Tested N Absent/ Other % Absent/ Other 3 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Membership1 N Tested2 % Tested % Proficient All Students 83,535 80,008 95.8 91.4 3,527 4.2 Female 42,474 40,867 96.2 92.7 1,607 3.8 Male 41,061 39,141 95.3 90.0 1,920 4.7 American Indian 1,017 976 96.0 89.8 41 4.0 Asian 1,786 1,677 93.9 87.0 109 6.1 Black 22,928 21,543 94.0 85.4 1,385 6.0 Hispanic 3,331 3,059 91.8 79.1 272 8.2 Multi-Racial 1,105 1,025 92.8 89.1 80 7.2 White 53,368 51,728 96.9 94.9 1,640 3.1 Title I 573 522 91.1 73.3 51 8.9 Schoolwide Title I 395 357 90.4 76.2 38 9.6 Targeted Assistance Title I 92 82 89.1 64.1 10 10.9 Not Title I 66,474 64,876 97.6 93.9 1,598 2.4 Migrant 90 86 95.6 70.0 4 4.4 Not Migrant 66,957 65,312 97.5 93.7 1,645 2.5 Free/Reduced Lunch** Not Free/Reduced Lunch** Limited English Proficient 244 215 88.1 56.6 29 11.9 Not Limited English Proficient 83,291 79,793 95.8 91.5 3,498 4.2 Students With Disabilities 6,313 5,899 93.4 76.9 414 6.6 Students Without Disabilities 77,222 74,109 96.0 92.6 3,113 4.0 Students With IEPs 5,460 5,065 92.8 74.5 395 7.2 Students Without IEPs 78,075 74,943 96.0 92.5 3,132 4.0 Behaviorally-Emotionally Disabled 326 293 89.9 64.7 33 10.1 Hearing Impaired 74 72 97.3 82.4 2 2.7 Educable Mentally Disabled 498 380 76.3 35.5 118 23.7 Specific Learning Disabled 3,384 3,293 97.3 81.1 91 2.7 Speech-Language Impaired 34 30 88.2 73.5 4 11.8 Visually Impaired 28 27 96.4 92.9 1 3.6 Other Health Impaired 873 818 93.7 81.2 55 6.3 Orthopedically Impaired 39 32 82.1 74.4 7 17.9 Traumatic Brain Injury 22 19 86.4 68.2 3 13.6 Autistic 79 57 72.2 55.7 22 27.8 Severely/Profoundly Mentally Disabled 13 2 15.4 * 11 84.6 Multihandicapped 13 6 46.2 23.1 7 53.8 Deaf-Blind 18 18 100.0 72.2 0 0.0 Trainable Mentally Disabled 59 18 30.5 13.6 41 69.5 Section 504 853 834 97.8 92.0 19 2.2 Notes: 1"Membership" is the total number of students on the 2003-04 Masterbuild data file. *Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. **Free/ Reduced Lunch information is not collected for grades 9 and 11. These data represent coding on the 2003-04 test documents. 2"N Tested" represents the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Table 4. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Statewide Number of Students Tested and Number Not Tested, Grade 11 Category Not Tested N Absent/ Other % Absent/ Other 4 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Membership1 N Tested2 % Tested % Proficient All Students 76,846 74,170 96.5 94.1 2,676 3.5 Female 39,188 38,065 97.1 >=95% 1,123 2.9 Male 37,658 36,105 95.9 93.0 1,553 4.1 American Indian 958 921 96.1 93.1 37 3.9 Asian 1,722 1,662 96.5 93.1 60 3.5 Black 20,929 19,828 94.7 89.7 1,101 5.3 Hispanic 2,614 2,468 94.4 88.6 146 5.6 Multi-Racial 811 781 96.3 94.5 30 3.7 White 49,812 48,510 97.4 >=95% 1,302 2.6 Title I 552 466 84.4 75.5 86 15.6 Schoolwide Title I 442 369 83.5 75.1 73 16.5 Targeted Assistance Title I 46 39 84.8 76.1 7 15.2 Not Title I 72,153 69,772 96.7 94.5 2,381 3.3 Migrant 66 60 90.9 78.8 6 9.1 Not Migrant 72,639 70,178 96.6 94.3 2,461 3.4 Free/Reduced Lunch 16,256 15,455 95.1 90.0 801 4.9 Not Free/Reduced Lunch 60,590 58,715 96.9 >=95% 1,875 3.1 Limited English Proficient 1,188 1,141 96.0 80.4 47 4.0 Not Limited English Proficient 75,658 73,029 96.5 94.4 2,629 3.5 Students With Disabilities 6,784 5,671 83.6 69.3 1,113 16.4 Students Without Disabilities 70,062 68,499 97.8 >=95% 1,563 2.2 Students With IEPs 6,328 5,219 82.5 67.3 1,109 17.5 Students Without IEPs 70,518 68,951 97.8 >=95% 1,567 2.2 Behaviorally-Emotionally Disabled 232 212 91.4 71.6 20 8.6 Hearing Impaired 86 82 95.3 86.0 4 4.7 Educable Mentally Disabled 1,026 597 58.2 21.7 429 41.8 Specific Learning Disabled 3,505 3,389 96.7 85.1 116 3.3 Speech-Language Impaired 41 39 95.1 78.0 2 4.9 Visually Impaired 35 31 88.6 85.7 4 11.4 Other Health Impaired 708 668 94.4 84.0 40 5.6 Orthopedically Impaired 53 43 81.1 71.7 10 18.9 Traumatic Brain Injury 53 38 71.7 69.8 15 28.3 Autistic 153 62 40.5 29.4 91 59.5 Severely/Profoundly Mentally Disabled 56 8 14.3 14.3 48 85.7 Multihandicapped 119 11 9.2 * 108 90.8 Deaf-Blind 21 19 90.5 76.2 2 9.5 Trainable Mentally Disabled 240 20 8.3 <=5% 220 91.7 Section 504 456 452 99.1 >=95% 4 0.9 Notes: 1"Membership" is the total number of students on the 2003-04 Masterbuild data file. *Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. These data represent coding on the 2003-04 test documents. 2"N Tested" represents the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Table 5. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Statewide Number of Students Tested and Number Not Tested, Grade 12 Category Not Tested N Absent/ Other % Absent/ Other 5 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 6 1999-00 Class of 2004 Class of 2003 Class of 2002 Class of 2001 Class of 2000 N Passing = 67,896 N Passing = 76,760 N Passing =70,072 N Passing =62,505 N Passing =59,057 Membership*= 95,354 Membership*=101,423 Membership*=81,196 Membership*=69,299 Membership*=63,406 2000-01 Class of 2005 Class of 2004 Class of 2003 Class of 2002 Class of 2001 N Passing = 74,533 N Passing = 78,865 N Passing =74,885 N Passing =65,348 N Passing =60,732 Membership*= 97,898 Membership*=102,252 Membership*=85,592 Membership*=71,603 Membership*=64,516 2001-02 Class of 2006 Class of 2005 Class of 2004 Class of 2003 Class of 2002 N Passing = 74,118 N Passing = 87,787 N Passing =79,914 N Passing =71,818 N Passing =66,679 Membership*=102,735 Membership*=112,212 Membership*=92,628 Membership*=79,057 Membership*=71,077 2002-03 Class of 2007 Class of 2006 Class of 2005 Class of 2004 Class of 2003 N Passing = 81,682 N Passing = 87,384 N Passing =81,564 N Passing =72,848 N Passing =70,768 Membership*=106,197 Membership*=113,969 Membership*=93,055 Membership*=79,898 Membership*=74,833 2003-04 Class of 2008 Class of 2007 Class of 2006 Class of 2005 Class of 2004 N Passing = 85,116 N Passing = 93,197 N Passing =83,686 N Passing =76,325 N Passing =72,349 Membership*=109,466 Membership*=119,403 Membership*=97,211 Membership*=83,535 Membership*=76,846 Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). *Membership equals the total number of records on the NCDPI Masterbuild file. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Figure 1. 1999-00 to 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard, Percent Passing1 by Class 71.2 75.7 86.3 90.2 93.1 76.1 77.1 87.5 91.3 94.1 72.1 78.2 86.3 90.8 93.8 76.9 76.7 87.7 91.2 94.6 77.8 78.1 86.1 91.4 94.1 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 8th Grade 9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade 12th Grade Percent Passing 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 7 Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Figure 2. 1999-00 to 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard, Percent Passing1 at the End of Grades 8-12 76.9 71.2 76.1 72.1 77.8 76.7 75.7 77.1 78.2 78.1 86.3 87.5 86.3 87.7 86.1 90.2 91.3 90.8 91.2 91.4 93.1 94.1 93.8 94.6 94.1 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 Percent Passing Grade 9 Grade 12 Grade 11 Grade 10 Grade 8 8 Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency tests(s), or competency screen(s). 21996-97 data reflect changes received from LEAs after publication of the 1996-97 Competency Report. 31997-98 was the first year that 12th grade was tested. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Figure 3. 1996-97 to 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard, Percent Passing1 for the Classes of 1999-2008 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 84.3 90.2 89.0 92.8 90.2 93.1 91.3 94.1 90.8 93.8 94.6 77.8 78.1 86.1 91.4 94.1 73.3 61.9 84.8 73.6 68.4 84.3 74.6 68.6 86.3 71.2 75.7 87.5 77.1 76.1 86.3 78.2 72.1 91.2 87.7 76.7 76.9 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 Percent Passing 1996-97² 1997-98³ 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 Grade: Class of: 8 8 9 8 9 10 8 9 10 11 8 9 101112 8 9 10 11 12 8 9 101112 8 9 101112 9 1011 12 10 11 12 9 Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screens(s). Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Figure 4. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent Passing1 by Ethnicity for the Classes of 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008, at the End of the 2003-04 School Year Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 77.8 78.1 86.1 91.4 94.1 71.7 69.1 79.6 89.8 93.1 83.8 79.8 83.4 87.0 93.1 63.0 65.2 76.2 85.4 89.7 59.0 52.9 66.8 79.1 88.6 81.5 81.7 86.9 89.1 94.5 86.9 87.6 92.4 94.9 >=95 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 Percent Passing All Students American Indian Asian Black Hispanic Multi-Racial White Class of: Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 10 Figure 5. 1999-00 to 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent Passing1 by Ethnicity for the Classes of 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008 at End of Grade 8 1999-00 N Passing = 67,896 N Passing = 853 N Passing =1,305 N Passing =14,224 N Passing =1,437 N Passing = 551 N Passing =49,526 Class of 2004 Membership* = 95,354 Membership* =1,403 Membership* =1,735 Membership* =27,689 Membership* =3,056 Membership* = 761 Membership* =60,710 2000-01 N Passing = 74,533 N Passing =1,000 N Passing =1,341 N Passing =16,980 N Passing =1,991 N Passing = 806 N Passing =52,415 Class of 2005 Membership* = 97,898 Membership* =1,512 Membership* =1,740 Membership* =28,820 Membership* =3,897 Membership* = 991 Membership* =60,938 2001-02 N Passing = 74,118 N Passing = 849 N Passing =1,485 N Passing =16,424 N Passing =2,149 N Passing = 949 N Passing =52,239 Class of 2006 Membership* =102,735 Membership* =1,411 Membership* =1,919 Membership* =30,491 Membership* =4,531 Membership* =1,259 Membership* =63,072 2002-03 N Passing = 81,682 N Passing =1,006 N Passing =1,687 N Passing =19,489 N Passing =3,029 N Passing =1,242 N Passing =55,229 Class of 2007 Membership* =106,197 Membership* =1,489 Membership* =2,046 Membership* =31,809 Membership* =5,347 Membership* =1,541 Membership* =63,965 2003-04 N Passing = 85,116 N Passing =1,111 N Passing =1,775 N Passing =20,834 N Passing =3,588 N Passing =1,531 N Passing =56,277 Class of 2008 Membership* =109,466 Membership* =1,550 Membership* =2,118 Membership* =33,075 Membership* =6,080 Membership* =1,879 Membership* =64,764 Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency tests(s), or competency screen(s). *Membership equals the total number of records on the NCDPI Masterbuild file. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. 71.2 60.8 51.4 47.0 76.1 66.1 77.1 58.9 51.1 81.3 86.0 72.1 60.2 77.4 53.9 75.4 82.8 61.3 80.6 86.3 81.6 75.2 72.4 47.4 56.6 82.5 67.6 76.9 86.9 81.5 63.0 59.0 83.8 71.7 77.8 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 All Students American Indian Asian Black Hispanic Multi-Racial White Percent Passing 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 11 1999-00 N Passing = 76,760 N Passing = 906 N Passing =1,400 N Passing =18,440 N Passing =1,600 N Passing = 563 N Passing =53,849 Class of 2003 Membership* =101,423 Membership* =1,496 Membership* =1,934 Membership* =30,830 Membership* =3,174 Membership* = 741 Membership* =63,241 2000-01 N Passing = 78,865 N Passing =1,046 N Passing =1,490 N Passing =18,964 N Passing =1,948 N Passing = 693 N Passing =54,724 Class of 2004 Membership* =102,252 Membership* =1,561 Membership* =1,967 Membership* =30,597 Membership* =3,911 Membership* = 895 Membership* =63,314 2001-02 N Passing = 87,787 N Passing =1,236 N Passing =1,582 N Passing =22,750 N Passing =2,630 N Passing = 999 N Passing =58,554 Class of 2005 Membership* =112,212 Membership* =1,886 Membership* =2,061 Membership* =34,696 Membership* =5,096 Membership* =1,275 Membership* =67,144 2002-03 N Passing = 87,384 N Passing =1,138 N Passing =1,651 N Passing =22,378 N Passing =2,888 N Passing =1,122 N Passing =58,207 Class of 2006 Membership* =113,969 Membership* =1,766 Membership* =2,198 Membership* =35,121 Membership* =5,932 Membership* =1,441 Membership* =67,511 2003-04 N Passing = 93,197 N Passing =1,255 N Passing =1,854 N Passing =24,260 N Passing =3,731 N Passing =1,495 N Passing =60,602 Class of 2007 Membership* =119,403 Membership* =1,816 Membership* =2,324 Membership* =37,228 Membership* =7,053 Membership* =1,829 Membership* =69,153 Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). *Membership equals the total number of records on the NCDPI Masterbuild file. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Figure 6. 1999-00 to 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent Passing1 by Ethnicity for the Classes of 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007 at End of Grade 9 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 75.7 60.6 72.4 59.8 50.4 76.0 85.1 77.1 67.0 75.7 62.0 49.8 77.4 86.4 78.2 65.5 76.8 65.6 51.6 78.4 87.2 76.7 64.4 75.1 63.7 48.7 77.9 86.2 78.1 69.1 79.8 65.2 52.9 81.7 87.6 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 All Students American Indian Asian Black Hispanic Multi-Racial White Percent Passing 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 12 1999-00 N Passing = 70,072 N Passing = 852 N Passing =1,381 N Passing =17,081 N Passing =1,317 N Passing = 474 N Passing =48,965 Class of 2002 Membership* = 81,196 Membership* =1,124 Membership* =1,696 Membership* =22,730 Membership* =1,853 Membership* = 553 Membership* =53,235 2000-01 N Passing =74,885 N Passing = 871 N Passing =1,459 N Passing =18,706 N Passing =1,664 N Passing = 621 N Passing =51,564 Class of 2003 Membership* =85,592 Membership* =1,068 Membership* =1,778 Membership* =24,137 Membership* =2,396 Membership* = 691 Membership* =55,521 2001-02 N Passing =79,914 N Passing =1,007 N Passing =1,633 N Passing =19,952 N Passing =2,100 N Passing = 726 N Passing =54,477 Class of 2004 Membership* =92,628 Membership* =1,228 Membership* =1,973 Membership* =26,363 Membership* =3,171 Membership* = 837 Membership* =59,025 2002-03 N Passing =81,564 N Passing =1,050 N Passing =1,610 N Passing =20,986 N Passing =2,620 N Passing = 991 N Passing =54,307 Class of 2005 Membership* =93,055 Membership* =1,265 Membership* =1,919 Membership* =26,528 Membership* =3,826 Membership* =1,143 Membership* =58,374 2003-04 N Passing =83,686 N Passing =1,021 N Passing =1,702 N Passing =21,424 N Passing =2,994 N Passing =1,163 N Passing =55,382 Class of 2006 Membership* =97,211 Membership* =1,283 Membership* =2,041 Membership* =28,103 Membership* =4,482 Membership* =1,339 Membership* =59,963 Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). *Membership equals the total number of records on the NCDPI Masterbuild file. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Figure 7. 1999-00 to 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent Passing1 by Ethnicity for the Classes of 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006 at End of Grade 10 86.3 75.8 81.4 75.1 71.1 85.7 92.0 87.5 81.6 82.1 77.5 69.4 89.9 92.9 86.3 82.0 82.8 75.7 66.2 86.7 92.3 87.7 83.0 83.9 79.1 68.5 86.7 93.0 86.1 79.6 83.4 76.2 66.8 86.9 92.4 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0 All Students American Indian Asian Black Hispanic Multi-Racial White Percent Passing 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 13 1999-00 N Passing =62,505 N Passing = 676 N Passing =1,209 N Passing =15,553 N Passing =1,119 N Passing = 316 N Passing =43,632 Class of 2002 Membership* = 69,299 Membership* = 822 Membership* =1,438 Membership* =18,841 Membership* =1,389 Membership* = 365 Membership* =46,444 2000-01 N Passing =65,348 N Passing = 721 N Passing =1,346 N Passing =15,964 N Passing =1,336 N Passing = 479 N Passing =45,502 Class of 2003 Membership* =71,603 Membership* = 830 Membership* =1,551 Membership* =18,969 Membership* =1,669 Membership* = 538 Membership* =48,046 2001-02 N Passing =71,818 N Passing = 766 N Passing =1,414 N Passing =17,748 N Passing =1,759 N Passing = 605 N Passing =49,485 Class of 2004 Membership* =79,057 Membership* = 861 Membership* =1,639 Membership* =21,178 Membership* =2,235 Membership* = 690 Membership* =52,397 2002-03 N Passing =72,848 N Passing = 899 N Passing =1,538 N Passing =17,967 N Passing =2,044 N Passing = 742 N Passing =49,658 Class of 2005 Membership* =79,898 Membership* =1,000 Membership* =1,752 Membership* =21,330 Membership* =2,640 Membership* = 817 Membership* =52,359 2003-04 N Passing =76,325 N Passing = 913 N Passing =1,553 N Passing =19,570 N Passing =2,634 N Passing = 985 N Passing =50,670 Class of 2006 Membership* =83,535 Membership* =1,017 Membership* =1,786 Membership* =22,928 Membership* =3,331 Membership* =1,105 Membership* =53,368 Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). *Membership equals the total number of records on the NCDPI Masterbuild file. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Figure 8. 1999-00 to 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent Passing1 by Ethnicity for the Classes of 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006 at End of Grade 11 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 90.2 82.2 84.1 82.5 80.6 86.6 91.3 93.9 86.9 86.8 84.2 80.0 89.0 94.7 90.8 89.0 86.3 83.8 78.7 87.7 94.4 91.2 89.9 87.8 84.2 77.4 90.8 94.8 91.4 89.8 87.0 85.4 79.1 89.1 94.9 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0 All Students American Indian Asian Black Hispanic Multi-Racial White Percent Passing 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 14 1999-00 N Passing =59,057 N Passing =664 N Passing =1,246 N Passing =15,173 N Passing =1,013 N Passing =315 N Passing = ** Class of 2000 Membership* =63,406 Membership* =771 Membership* =1,389 Membership* =17,191 Membership* =1,167 Membership* =342 Membership* =42,541 2000-01 N Passing =60,732 N Passing =712 N Passing =1,287 N Passing =15,741 N Passing =1,179 N Passing =353 N Passing = ** Class of 2001 Membership* =64,516 Membership* =779 Membership* =1,391 Membership* =17,570 Membership* =1,314 Membership* =378 Membership* =43,084 2001-02 N Passing =66,679 N Passing =766 N Passing =1, 416 N Passing =16,891 N Passing =1,519 N Passing =500 N Passing = ** Class of 2002 Membership* =71,077 Membership* =830 Membership* =1,554 Membership* =18,957 Membership* =1,709 Membership* =537 Membership* =47,442 2002-03 N Passing =70,768 N Passing =767 N Passing =1,472 N Passing =18,197 N Passing =1,953 N Passing =646 N Passing = ** Class of 2003 Membership* =74,833 Membership* =811 Membership* =1,596 Membership* =20,117 Membership* =2,173 Membership* =681 Membership* =49,455 2003-04 N Passing =72,349 N Passing =892 N Passing =1,604 N Passing =18,766 N Passing =2,315 N Passing =766 N Passing = ** Class of 2004 Membership* =76,846 Membership* =958 Membership* =1,722 Membership* =20,929 Membership* =2,614 Membership* =811 Membership* =49,812 Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). *Membership equals the total number of records on the NCDPI Masterbuild file. **Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Figure 9. 1999-00 to 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent Passing1 by Ethnicity for the Classes of 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004 at End of Grade 12 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 93.1 86.1 89.7 88.3 86.8 94.1 91.4 92.5 89.6 89.7 92.1 93.8 92.3 91.1 93.4 89.1 88.9 94.6 94.6 92.2 90.5 93.1 89.9 94.1 93.1 93.1 94.9 89.7 88.6 94.5 >=95 >=95 >=95>=95 >=95 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0 All Students American Indian Asian Black Hispanic Multi-Racial White Percent Passing 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 12 Category Member-ship Number Passing Percent Proficient Member-ship Number Passing Percent Proficient Member-ship Number Passing Percent Proficient Member-ship Number Passing Percent Proficient Member-ship Number Passing Percent Proficient All Students 109,466 85,116 77.8 119,403 93,197 78.1 97,211 83,686 86.1 83,535 76,325 91.4 76,846 72,349 94.1 Academically/Intellectually Gifted AIG Reading 14,856 * >=95 15,976 * >=95 15,538 * >=95 14,262 * >=95 10,369 * >=95 AIG Mathematics 14,283 * >=95 15,734 * >=95 15,720 * >=95 14,224 * >=95 10,369 * >=95 All Students with Disabilities2 16,982 7,030 41.4 13,291 7,196 54.1 11,373 6,337 55.7 6,313 4,853 76.9 6,784 4,704 69.3 Behaviorally-Emotionally Disabled 1,382 378 27.4 1,254 450 35.9 753 332 44.1 326 211 64.7 232 166 71.6 Hearing Impaired 122 58 47.5 111 65 58.6 128 68 53.1 74 61 82.4 86 74 86.0 Educable Mentally Disabled 2,657 * <=5 1,048 135 12.9 1,596 121 7.6 498 177 35.5 1,026 223 21.7 Specific Learning Disabled 7,297 3,711 50.9 6,886 3,911 56.8 5,433 3,549 65.3 3,384 2,746 81.1 3,505 2,982 85.1 Learning Disabled-Reading 5,385 2,558 47.5 7,793 4,037 51.8 5,993 3,812 63.6 4,639 3,564 76.8 3,799 3,278 86.3 Learning Disabled-Mathematics 2,971 1,149 38.7 4,766 2,116 44.4 4,093 2,421 59.1 3,274 2,454 75.0 2,743 2,345 85.5 Learning Disabled-Written Expression 5,742 3,060 53.3 8,273 4,555 55.1 6,519 4,340 66.6 5,157 4,075 79.0 4,196 3,694 88.0 Learning Disabled-Other 189 95 50.3 467 282 60.4 620 419 67.6 530 436 82.3 475 417 87.8 Speech-Language Impaired 195 109 55.9 115 62 53.9 82 54 65.9 34 25 73.5 41 32 78.0 Visually Impaired 56 35 62.5 62 43 69.4 50 35 70.0 28 26 92.9 35 30 85.7 Other Health Impaired 2,368 1,059 44.7 1,914 1,088 56.8 1,397 863 61.8 873 709 81.2 708 595 84.0 Orthopedically Impaired 62 28 45.2 40 25 62.5 57 31 54.4 39 29 74.4 53 38 71.7 Traumatic Brain Injured 67 23 34.3 40 16 40.0 30 14 46.7 22 15 68.2 53 37 69.8 Autistic 316 72 22.8 118 64 54.2 139 44 31.7 79 44 55.7 153 45 29.4 Severely/Profoundly Mentally Disabled 62 * <=5 13 * * 38 * <=5 13 1 7.7 56 8 14.3 Multihandicapped 124 * <=5 17 2 11.8 70 * <=5 13 3 23.1 119 * <=5 Deaf/Blind 19 9 47.4 101 45 44.6 10 3 30.0 18 13 72.2 21 16 76.2 Trainable Mentally Disabled 269 * <=5 31 5 16.1 199 * <=5 59 8 13.6 240 * <=5 Section 504 1,986 1,456 73.3 1,541 1,285 83.4 1,391 1,217 87.5 853 785 92.0 456 * >=95 Not Coded 1,842 1,312 71.2 1,439 1,184 82.3 1,274 1,100 86.3 781 714 91.4 368 * >=95 Limited English Proficient 3,265 1,224 37.5 2,406 1,638 68.1 2,132 985 46.2 244 138 56.6 1,188 955 80.4 Not Served by Title I 88,046 70,302 79.8 109,098 89,947 82.4 94,546 82,086 86.8 66,474 62,399 93.9 72,153 68,154 94.5 Schoolwide Title I Program 20,102 14,100 70.1 879 485 55.2 634 385 60.7 395 301 76.2 442 332 75.1 Targeted Assistance 1,049 595 56.7 353 151 42.8 192 120 62.5 92 59 64.1 46 35 76.1 Migrant 688 417 60.6 210 93 44.3 141 74 52.5 90 63 70.0 66 52 78.8 Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). 2"All Students with Disabilities" includes "Section 504" but not those in the "Not Coded" category. *Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. All variables were merged from external data sources with the Masterbuild file. Due to the challenges of merging multiple files, inconsistencies in data quality may increase from grade 8 to grade 12. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Across Grades 8 - 12 Table 6. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent Passing the Competency Standard1 Performance of Exceptional, Limited English Proficient, and Title I Students, 15 Grade 8 N Passing = 85,116 N Passing = 7,030 Membership = 109,466 Membership = 16,982 Grade 9 N Passing = 93,197 N Passing = 7,196 Membership = 119,403 Membership = 13,291 Grade 10 N Passing = 83,686 N Passing = 6,337 Membership = 97,211 Membership = 11,373 Grade 11 N Passing = 76,325 N Passing = 4,853 Membership = 83,535 Membership = 6,313 Grade 12 N Passing = 72,349 N Passing = 4,704 Membership = 76,846 Membership = 6,784 Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency tests(s), or competency screen(s). Due to challenges of merging multiple files, inconsistencies in data quality may increase from grade 8 to grade 12. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Grades 8-12 Report of Student Performance in the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Figure 10. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent Passing the Competency Standard,1 Performance of Students with Disabilities, 77.8 41.4 78.1 54.1 86.1 55.7 91.4 76.9 94.1 69.3 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 State All Students with Disabilities Percent Passing Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 12 16 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 BED- Behaviorally-Emotionally Disabled HI- Hearing Impaired EMD-Educable Mentally Disabled SLD- Specific Learning Disabled SLI- Speech-Language Impaired VI- Visually Impaired OHI-Other Health Impaired OI-Orthopedically Impaired Grade 8 N Passing = 85,116 N Passing = 7,030 N Passing = 378 N Passing = 58 N Passing = * N Passing = 3,711 N Passing = 109 N Passing = 35 N Passing = 1,059 N Passing = 28 Membership =109,466 Membership = 16,982 Membership = 1,382 Membership = 122 Membership = 2,657 Membership = 7,297 Membership = 195 Membership = 56 Membership = 2,368 Membership = 62 Grade 9 N Passing = 93,197 N Passing = 7,196 N Passing = 450 N Passing = 65 N Passing = 135 N Passing = 3,911 N Passing = 62 N Passing = 43 N Passing = 1,088 N Passing = 25 Membership =119,403 Membership = 13,291 Membership = 1,254 Membership = 111 Membership = 1,048 Membership = 6,886 Membership = 115 Membership = 62 Membership = 1,914 Membership = 40 Grade 10 N Passing = 83,686 N Passing = 6,337 N Passing = 332 N Passing = 68 N Passing = 121 N Passing = 3,549 N Passing = 54 N Passing = 35 N Passing = 863 N Passing = 31 Membership = 97,211 Membership = 11,373 Membership = 753 Membership = 128 Membership = 1,596 Membership = 5,433 Membership = 82 Membership = 50 Membership = 1,397 Membership = 57 Grade 11 N Passing = 76,325 N Passing = 4,853 N Passing = 211 N Passing = 61 N Passing = 177 N Passing = 2,746 N Passing = 25 N Passing = 26 N Passing = 709 N Passing = 29 Membership = 83,535 Membership = 6,313 Membership = 326 Membership = 74 Membership = 498 Membership = 3,384 Membership = 34 Membership = 28 Membership = 873 Membership = 39 Grade 12 N Passing = 72,349 N Passing = 4,704 N Passing = 166 N Passing = 74 N Passing = 223 N Passing = 2,982 N Passing = 32 N Passing = 30 N Passing = 595 N Passing = 38 Membership = 76,846 Membership = 6,784 Membership = 232 Membership = 86 Membership = 1,026 Membership = 3,505 Membership = 41 Membership = 35 Membership = 708 Membership = 53 Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). Due to challenges of merging multiple files, inconsistencies in data quality may increase from grade 8 to grade 12. *Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. 17 Figure 11. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent Passing the Competency Standard,1 Performance of Students with Disabilities by Classification, Grades 8-12 77.8 12.9 53.1 7.6 70.0 54.4 82.4 92.9 81.2 74.4 69.3 71.6 86.0 21.7 85.1 78.0 85.7 84.0 71.7 <=5 50.9 55.9 27.4 41.4 62.5 45.2 44.7 47.5 56.8 53.9 35.9 54.1 78.1 69.4 62.5 56.8 58.6 65.3 65.9 44.1 55.7 86.1 61.8 35.5 81.1 73.5 64.7 76.9 91.4 94.1 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 State All Students with Disabilities BED HI EMD SLD SLI VI OHI OI Percent Passing Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 12 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 TBI-Traumatic Brain Injured A - Autistic D/B - Deaf/Blind SPMD - Severely/Profoundly Mentally Disabled MH-Multihandicapped TMD - Trainable Mentally Disabled 504 - Section 504 Grade 8 N Passing = 85,116 N Passing = 7,030 N Passing = 23 N Passing = 72 N Passing = 9 N Passing = * N Passing = * N Passing = * N Passing = 1,456 Membership = 109,466 Membership = 16,982 Membership = 67 Membership = 316 Membership = 19 Membership = 62 Membership = 124 Membership = 269 Membership = 1,986 Grade 9 N Passing = 93,197 N Passing = 7,196 N Passing = 16 N Passing = 64 N Passing = 45 N Passing = * N Passing = 2 N Passing = 5 N Passing = 1,285 Membership = 119,403 Membership = 13,291 Membership = 40 Membership = 118 Membership = 101 Membership = 13 Membership = 17 Membership = 31 Membership = 1,541 Grade 10 N Passing = 83,686 N Passing = 6,337 N Passing = 14 N Passing = 44 N Passing = 3 N Passing = * N Passing = * N Passing = * N Passing = 1,217 Membership = 97,211 Membership = 11,373 Membership = 30 Membership = 139 Membership = 10 Membership = 38 Membership = 70 Membership = 199 Membership = 1,391 Grade 11 N Passing = 76,325 N Passing = 4,853 N Passing = 15 N Passing = 44 N Passing = 13 N Passing = 1 N Passing = 3 N Passing = 8 N Passing = 785 Membership = 83,535 Membership = 6,313 Membership = 22 Membership = 79 Membership = 18 Membership = 13 Membership = 13 Membership = 59 Membership = 853 Grade 12 N Passing = 72,349 N Passing = 4,704 N Passing = 37 N Passing = 45 N Passing = 16 N Passing = 8 N Passing = * N Passing = * N Passing = * Membership = 76,846 Membership = 6,784 Membership = 53 Membership = 153 Membership = 21 Membership = 56 Membership = 119 Membership = 240 Membership = 456 Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency sc Due to challenges of merging multiple files, inconsistencies in data quality may increase from grade 8 to grade 12. *Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Testing Program 18 Figure 11. 2003-04 North Carolina Competency Tests Percent Passing the Competency Standard,1 Performance of Students with Disabilities by Classification, Grades 8-12 (continued) 77.8 47.4 44.6 31.7 30.0 55.7 13.6 92.0 69.3 69.8 29.4 76.2 <=5 <=5 34.3 41.4 <=5 73.3 22.8 <=5 11.8 40.0 54.1 78.1 16.1 83.4 54.2 <=5 <=5 46.7 55.7 86.1 87.5 <=5 72.2 7.7 23.1 68.2 76.9 91.4 94.1 14.3 84.0 <=5 <=5 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 State All Students with Disabilities TBI A D/B SPMD MH TMD 504 Percent Passing Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 12 Grade 8 N Passing = 85,116 N Passing =1,224 Membership=109,466 Membership=3,265 Grade 9 N Passing = 93,197 N Passing =1,638 Membership=119,403 Membership=2,406 Grade 10 N Passing = 83,686 N Passing = 985 Membership= 97,211 Membership=2,132 Grade 11 N Passing = 76,325 N Passing = 138 Membership= 83,535 Membership= 244 Grade 12 N Passing = 72,349 N Passing = 955 Membership= 76,846 Membership=1,188 Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s) Due to challenges of merging multiple files, inconsistencies in data quality may increase from grade 8 to grade 12 Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program Grades 8-12 Report of Student Performance in the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Figure 12. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent Passing the Competency Standard,1 Performance of Limited English Proficient Students, 77.8 37.5 78.1 68.1 86.1 46.2 91.4 56.6 94.1 80.4 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 State Limited English Proficient Percent Passing Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 12 19 Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). Due to rounding, percents may not sum to 100.0 percent. All LEAs are included in this figure. Data received from LEAs after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 at End of Grade 8 Figure 13. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent of LEAs and Charter Schools in Each Percent Passing1 Category, for the Class of 2008, 9.5% 43.8% 27.8% 11.2% 5.3% 2.4% Below 50% 50-59% 60-69% 70-79% 80-89% 90% (or above) Percent Passing Categories: 20 Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). Due to rounding, percents may not sum to 100.0 percent. All LEAs are included in this figure. Data received from LEAs after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 at End of Grade 9 Figure 14. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent of LEAs and Charter Schools in Each Percent Passing1 Category, for the Class of 2007, 24.1% 41.8% 9.9% 3.6% 6.4% 14.2% Below 50% 50-59% 60-69% 70-79% 80-89% 90% (or above) Percent Passing Categories: 21 Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). Due to rounding, percents may not sum to 100.0 percent. All LEAs are included in this figure. Data received from LEAs after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 at End of Grade 10 Figure 15. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent of LEAs and Charter Schools in Each Percent Passing1 Category, for the Class of 2006, 0.0% 2.2% 11.6% 3.6% 42.8% 39.9% Below 50% 50-59% 60-69% 70-79% 80-89% 90% (or above) Percent Passing Categories: 22 Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). Due to rounding, percents may not sum to 100.0 percent. All LEAs are included in this figure. Data received from LEAs after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 at End of Grade 11 Figure 16. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent of LEAs and Charter Schools in Each Percent Passing1 Category, for the Class of 2005, 75.0% 0.8% 0.0% 3.8% 18.2% 2.3% Below 50% 50-59% 60-69% 70-79% 80-89% 90% (or above) Percent Passing Categories: 23 Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). Due to rounding, percents may not sum to 100.0 percent. All LEAs are included in this figure. Data received from LEAs after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 at End of Grade 12 Figure 17. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent of LEAs and Charter Schools in Each Percent Passing1 Category, for the Class of 2004, 89.2% 8.5% 0.8% 0.8% 0.0% 0.8% Below 50% 50-59% 60-69% 70-79% 80-89% 90% (or above) Percent Passing Categories: 24 25 Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). All LEAs are included in this figure. Data received from LEAs after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. at the End of Grades 8-12 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Figure 18. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent of LEAs and Charter Schools in Each Percent Passing1 Category, for the Class of 2004, End of Grade 8 End of Grade 9 End of Grade 10 End of Grade 11 End of Grade 12 Below 50% 50-59% 60-69% 70-79% 80-89% 90% (or above) Percent Passing Categories: Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Below 50% N=9 Carter Community** Alamance-Burlington Hickory City Alexander Hyde Imani Institute** Alpha Academy** Lee Alleghany Iredell-Statesville Kennedy Charter** Asheboro City Lenoir American Ren. Middle** Jackson Lakeside School** Asheville City Madison Avery Johnston Omuteko Gwamaziima** Bertie Martin Beaufort Kings Mountain City Provisions Academy** Bladen Montgomery Bethany Community** Lincoln SPARC Academy** Brunswick Mountain Community** Brevard Academy** Macon Success Institute** Burke Nash-Rocky Mount Buncombe McDowell Sugar Creek** Caswell Perquimans C.G. Woodson** Mitchell Charlotte/Mecklenburg Pitt CIS Academy** Moore Columbus Research Triangle** Cabarrus Mooresville City Craven Richmond Caldwell New Hanover 50-59% Cumberland River Mill Academy** Camden Newton-Conover City N=4 Duplin Roanoke Rapids City Cape Fear Center** Onslow Ann Atwater** Edgecombe Rockingham Carteret Orange Bridges** Elizabeth City/Pasquotank Rowan-Salisbury Catawba Orange Charter** S.B. Howard** Forsyth Academies** Rutherford Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Pamlico Vance Franklin Sampson Chatham Pender Gaston Scotland Cleveland Person Gates Swain Clinton City Piedmont Community** Greene Wayne Clover Garden** Polk Guilford Winston-Salem/Forsyth Currituck Quality Education** Halifax Yadkin Dare Randolph 60-69% Harnett Davidson Stanly N=19 Davie Stokes Academy of Moore County** Downtown Middle** Summit Charter** Anson East Wake Academy** Surry Chatham Charter** Edenton/Chowan Swain Durham Elkin City Thomas Jefferson** Guilford Charter** F Delany New School** Transylvania Hertford Graham Tyrrell Hoke Grandfather Academy** Union Jones Granville Vance Charter** Kannapolis City Greensboro Academy** Wake Kestrel Heights** Haliwa-Saponi Tribal** Wilkes Lexington City Haywood Wilson Northampton Henderson Yancey Robeson Shelby City Thomasville City Warren Arapahoe Charter** Lincoln Charter** Washington Ashe Magellan** Weldon City Cherokee Metrolina** Whiteville City Clay Mount Airy City Evergreen Community** Quest Academy** Exploris** Sterling Montessori** Franklin Academy** Watauga Lake Norman** Woods Charter** Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Data are rounded to the nearest whole percent for inclusion in the appropriate percent passing range category. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program 90% or Above N=16 Table 7. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent Passing* Category for the Class of 2008, at End of Grade 8, by LEA N=47 70-79% 80-89% N=74 26 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Below 50% 90% or above N=9 N=20 Alpha Academy** Alexander Jones Ashe C.G. Woodson** Alleghany Kings Mountain City Carteret Cape Lookout Marine** Asheboro City Lincoln Clover Garden** Crossroads Charter** Avery Martin East Wake Academy** J.H. Baker Jr High** Brunswick Moore Elkin City Kennedy Charter** Buncombe Mooresville City Franklin Academy** Lakeside School** Burke Nash-Rocky Mount Graham Laurinburg Charter** Cabarrus New Hanover Gray Stone Day** Provisions Academy** Camden Newton-Conover City Lincoln Charter** Catawba Onslow Macon Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Orange McDowell Chatham Pamlico Mount Airy City 50-59% Cherokee Perquimans Pender N=5 Clay Person Polk Crossnore Academy** Cleveland Pitt Raleigh Charter HS** Grandfather Academy** Clinton City Randolph River Mill Academy** Hertford Craven Rockingham Surry Laurinburg Homework** Currituck Rutherford Transylvania Lexington City Dare Sampson Watauga Davidson Stanly Woods Charter** Davie Stokes Edenton/Chowan Swain Franklin Thomas Jefferson** 60-69% Granville Tyrrell N=14 Haywood Union Ann Atwater** Henderson Wake Bertie Hyde Wilkes Durham Iredell-Statesville Yadkin Edgecombe Jackson Yancey Elizabeth City/Pasquotank Johnston Greene Halifax Hoke Kestrel Heights** Northampton Robeson Thomasville City Vance Whiteville City Alamance-Burlington Lee Anson Lenoir Asheville City Madison Beaufort Mitchell Bladen Montgomery Caldwell Richmond Caswell Roanoke Rapids City Charlotte/Mecklenburg Rocky Mount Prep Sch** Columbus Rowan-Salisbury Cumberland Scotland Duplin Shelby City Gaston Warren Gates Washington Guilford Wayne Harnett Weldon City Hickory City Wilson Kannapolis City Winston-Salem/Forsyth Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Data are rounded to the nearest whole percent for inclusion in the appropriate percent passing range category. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Table 8. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent Passing* Category for the Class of 2007, at End of Grade 9, by LEA 70-79% N=34 80-89% N=59 27 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Below 50% N=5 C.G. Woodson** Alamance-Burlington Madison Alexander Kannapolis City Crossnore Academy** Asheville City Martin Alleghany Kestrel Heights** Crossroads Charter** Beaufort Mitchell Ashe Laurinburg Homework** J.H. Baker Jr High** Bladen Montgomery Asheboro City Lee Laurinburg Charter** Brunswick Moore Avery Lenoir Burke Nash-Rocky Mount Buncombe Lincoln Charter** Caldwell Newton-Conover City Cabarrus Macon 50-59% Caswell Orange Camden McDowell N=0 Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Perquimans Carteret Mooresville City None Charlotte/Mecklenburg Richmond Catawba Mount Airy City Clay Roanoke Rapids City Chatham New Hanover Columbus Rockingham Cherokee Onslow Davidson Rowan-Salisbury Cleveland Pamlico 60-69% Duplin Rutherford Clinton City Pender N=3 Durham Scotland Clover Garden** Person Hertford Elizabeth City/Pasquotank Shelby City Craven Pitt Lakeside School** Franklin Swain Currituck Polk Provisions Academy** Gaston Vance Dare Raleigh Charter HS** Greene Wake Davie Randolph Guilford Warren East Wake Academy** River Mill Academy** Harnett Wayne Edenton/Chowan Sampson 70-79% Henderson Weldon City Elkin City Stanly N=16 Hoke Wilkes Franklin Academy** Stokes Anson Iredell-Statesville Wilson Gates Surry Bertie Jackson Winston-Salem/Forsyth Graham Thomas Jefferson** Cape Lookout Marine** Jones Yadkin Granville Transylvania Cumberland Kings Mountain City Yancey Gray Stone Day** Union Edgecombe Lincoln Haywood Watauga Halifax Hyde Woods Charter** Hickory City Johnston Kennedy Charter** Lexington City Northampton Robeson Rocky Mount Prep Sch** Thomasville City Tyrrell Washington Whiteville City Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Data are rounded to the nearest whole percent for inclusion in the appropriate percent passing range category. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. 80-89% N=55 Table 9. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent Passing* Category for the Class of 2006, at End of Grade 10, by LEA 90% or Above N=59 28 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Below 50% N=3 C.G. Woodson** Alamance-Burlington Gates Pamlico Crossroads Charter** Alexander Graham Pender Laurinburg Charter** Ashe Granville Perquimans Asheboro City Gray Stone Day** Person 50-59% Asheville City Halifax Pitt N=1 Beaufort Haywood Polk J.H. Baker Jr High** Bladen Henderson Raleigh Charter HS** Brunswick Hickory City Randolph Buncombe Hoke Richmond Burke Hyde River Mill Academy** 60-69% Cabarrus Iredell-Statesville Roanoke Rapids City N=0 Camden Jackson Rockingham None Carteret Johnston Rutherford Caswell Jones Sampson Catawba Kannapolis City Scotland Charlotte/Mecklenburg Kings Mountain City Stanly Chatham Lee Stokes 70-79% Cherokee Lenoir Surry N=5 Clay Lincoln Swain Hertford Cleveland Macon Thomas Jefferson** Kennedy Charter** Clinton City Madison Thomasville City Laurinburg Homework** Columbus Martin Transylvania Rocky Mount Prep Sch** Craven McDowell Tyrrell Shelby City Currituck Mitchell Union Dare Montgomery Vance Davidson Moore Warren Davie Mooresville City Watauga Alleghany Guilford Duplin Mount Airy City Weldon City Anson Harnett East Wake Academy** Nash-Rocky Mount Wilkes Avery Lexington City Edenton/Chowan New Hanover Winston-Salem/Forsyth Bertie Lincoln Charter** Elizabeth City/Pasquotank Newton-Conover City Woods Charter** Caldwell Northampton Elkin City Onslow Yadkin Cape Lookout Marine** Robeson Franklin Orange Yancey Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Rowan-Salisbury Cumberland Wake Durham Washington Edgecombe Wayne Gaston Whiteville City Greene Wilson Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Data are rounded to the nearest whole percent for inclusion in the appropriate percent passing range category. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. 80-89% N=24 N=99 Table 10. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent Passing* Category for the Class of 2005, at End of Grade 11, by LEA 90% or Above 29 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Below 50% N=1 Crossnore Academy** Alamance-Burlington Gates Person Alexander Graham Pitt Anson Granville Polk 50-59% Ashe Greene Provisions Academy** N=1 Asheboro City Guilford Raleigh Charter HS** Laurinburg Charter** Asheville City Harnett Randolph Avery Haywood Richmond Beaufort Henderson River Mill Academy** 60-69% Bladen Hertford Roanoke Rapids City N=0 Brunswick Hickory City Robeson None Buncombe Hoke Rockingham Burke Hyde Rowan-Salisbury 70-79% Cabarrus Iredell-Statesville Rutherford N=1 Caldwell Jackson Sampson J.H. Baker Jr High** Camden Johnston Scotland Carteret Kannapolis City Stanly 80-89% Caswell Kings Mountain City Stokes N=11 Catawba Lee Surry Alleghany Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Lenoir Swain Bertie Charlotte/Mecklenburg Lincoln Thomas Jefferson** Cape Lookout Marine** Chatham Macon Thomasville City Crossroads Charter** Cherokee Madison Transylvania Durham Clay Martin Tyrrell Edgecombe Cleveland McDowell Union Halifax Clinton City Mitchell Vance Jones Columbus Montgomery Wake Laurinburg Homework** Craven Moore Warren Lexington City Cumberland Mooresville City Washington Shelby City Currituck Mount Airy City Watauga Dare Nash-Rocky Mount Wayne Davidson New Hanover Weldon City Davie Newton-Conover City Whiteville City Duplin Northampton Wilkes East Wake Academy** Onslow Wilson Edenton/Chowan Orange Winston-Salem/Forsyth Elizabeth City/Pasquotank Pamlico Woods Charter** Elkin City Pender Yadkin Franklin Perquimans Yancey Gaston Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Data are rounded to the nearest whole percent for inclusion in the appropriate percent passing range category. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Table 11. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent Passing* Category for the Class of 2004, at End of Grade 12, by LEA 90% or Above N=115 30 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 State Percent Passing >=..9. 5 Magellan**, Metrolina**, Quest Academy**, Sterling Montessori** >=..9. 5 Lake Norman** >=95 Exploris** 94.5 Woods Charter** 94....0 Arapahoe Charter** 93.0 Lincoln Charter** 92.5 Ashe, Mount Airy City 92.0 Franklin Academy**, Watauga 91.5 Clay 91.0 Cherokee 90....5 Evergreen Community** 89....0 Bethany Community**, Chapel Hill-Carrboro City, Orange Charter**, Tyrrell 88.0 Alleghany, Currituck, Davie, Downtown Middle**, Greensboro Academy**, Yancey 87.5 Summit Charter** 87....0 Polk 86.0 Cabarrus, Grandfather Academy**, Onslow, Pender 85.5 Carteret, Mooresville City, Wilkes 85.0 Caldwell, Chatham, Dare, F Delany New School**, Kings Mountain City, McDowell, Transylvania, Vance Charter** 84.5 Catawba, Davidson 84.0 Moore, Person, Thomas Jefferson** 83.5 Camden, Cleveland, Clinton City, Elkin City, Henderson, Pamlico, Quality Education**, Wake 83.0 Avery, Graham, Haywood, Iredell-Statesville, Lincoln, Mitchell, Newton-Conover City, Stokes, Surry 82.5 Hyde, Johnston, Randolph, Stanly 82.0 American Ren. Middle**, C.G. Woodson**, CIS Academy**, Piedmont Community** 81.5 Alexander 81.0 Beaufort, Buncombe, Clover Garden**, Union, Wilson 80.5 Macon, Orange 80.0 Brevard Academy**, Cape Fear Center**, East Wake Academy**, Edenton/Chowan, Granville, Haliwa-Saponi Tribal**, Jackson, New Hanover 79....5 Swain 78.5 Burke, Perquimans, River Mill Academy**, Rockingham 2004 State 78.0 Hickory City, Rowan-Salisbury 77.5 Asheboro City 2003 State 77.0 Brunswick, Craven, Harnett, Rutherford, Wayne, Yadkin 2001 State 76.5 Alamance-Burlington 76.0 Gates, Martin, Nash-Rocky Mount, Richmond 75.5 Charlotte/Mecklenburg, Gaston, Sampson 75.0 Forsyth Academies**, Halifax, Lenoir, Roanoke Rapids City 74.5 Guilford, Lee 74.0 Scotland 73.5 Asheville City 73.0 Madison, Winston-Salem/Forsyth 72.5 Caswell, Elizabeth City/Pasquotank, Mountain Community** 2002 State 72.0 2000 State 71.5 Alpha Academy**, Bertie, Pitt, Rocky Mount Prep Sch** 71.0 Bladen, Greene, Montgomery 70.5 Duplin, Edgecombe, Franklin, Research Triangle** 70.0 Columbus, Cumberland 69.5 Hoke 1999 State 69.0 1998 State 68.5 Guilford Charter**, Kannapolis City, Robeson 68.0 Jones, Shelby City 67.5 Northampton 67.0 Academy of Moore County**, Durham 66.5 Weldon City 66....0 Warren 65....0 Thomasville City 64.0 Chatham Charter**, Lexington City 63.5 Anson 63....0 Kestrel Heights** 62....0 Whiteville City 61....0 Washington 60....0 Hertford 58....0 S.B. Howard** 53....0 Vance 50....0 Ann Atwater**, Bridges** 46....0 Sugar Creek** 44....0 Imani Institute** 40....0 Success Institute** 36....0 Provisions Academy** 29....0 Omuteko Gwamaziima** 28....0 SPARC Academy** 25....0 Kennedy Charter** 17....0 Carter Community**, Lakeside School** *** Crossnore Academy**, Laurinburg Homework** Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). Percent passing is rounded up to the nearest half percent. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix. ***Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Table 12. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent Passing* for the Class of 2008, at End of Grade 8, by LEA 2004 LEA Performance 31 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 State Percent Passing >=..9. 5 Raleigh Charter HS**, River Mill Academy**, Woods Charter** >=..9. 5 Franklin Academy**, Gray Stone Day** 94.0 Clover Garden** 93.5 Mount Airy City 93.0 Carteret, Elkin City, Watauga 9.2...5 Graham 91.5 Transylvania 9.1...0 Ashe, McDowell, Polk, Surry 90.0 East Wake Academy**, Lincoln Charter**, Macon, Pender 89.5 Camden 89.0 Dare 88.5 Pamlico 88.0 Johnston 87.5 Clinton City, Currituck 87.0 Clay, Onslow, Person 86.5 Catawba, Granville, Randolph, Stokes 86.0 Avery, Perquimans, Yadkin 85.5 Davie, Haywood 85.0 Kings Mountain City 84.5 Alleghany, Chapel Hill-Carrboro City, Henderson, Stanly 84.0 Alexander, Edenton/Chowan, Mooresville City, Tyrrell 83.5 Hyde, Union, Wilkes, Yancey 83.0 Cabarrus, Sampson 82.5 Brunswick, Buncombe, Cherokee, Iredell-Statesville, New Hanover, Thomas Jefferson** 82.0 Cleveland, Franklin, Jackson, Newton-Conover City 81.5 Burke, Chatham, Craven, Lincoln, Pitt 81.0 Davidson, Jones, Moore, Swain 80.5 Asheboro City, Rockingham, Rutherford 80.0 Orange, Wake 7.9...5 Lee, Martin, Nash-Rocky Mount 2004 State 78.5 Asheville City, Bladen, Caldwell, Duplin, Richmond, Roanoke Rapids City 2002 State 78.0 Columbus, Gaston, Gates, Kannapolis City, Madison 2001 State 77.5 Lenoir, Shelby City 2003 State 77.0 Beaufort, Wilson 76.5 Caswell, Harnett, Scotland 2000 State 7.6...0 Rowan-Salisbury 1999 State 7.5...0 Mitchell, Montgomery 1998 State 74.0 Charlotte/Mecklenburg, Warren 1997 State 73.5 73.0 Alamance-Burlington, Rocky Mount Prep Sch** 72.5 Wayne, Winston-Salem/Forsyth 72....0 Anson, Cumberland, Guilford 7.0...5 Hickory City, Washington 69.5 Weldon City 69.0 Elizabeth City/Pasquotank 68.5 Hoke 68.0 Greene 67.5 Durham 67.0 Edgecombe 6.6...5 Whiteville City 65.0 Ann Atwater** 6.4...5 Robeson 6.2...5 Halifax, Northampton 61.5 Vance 61.0 Bertie 60.5 Thomasville City 60.0 Kestrel Heights** 5.9...5 Lexington City 5.8...5 Crossnore Academy**, Laurinburg Homework** 5.7...5 Grandfather Academy** 5.6...5 Hertford 4.5...5 Lakeside School** 4.3...5 Cape Lookout Marine** 4.1...0 Crossroads Charter** 3.5...5 Provisions Academy** 2.9...0 Alpha Academy** 2.5...0 Laurinburg Charter** 2.2...5 C.G. Woodson** 2.1...5 Kennedy Charter** 20.0 J.H. Baker Jr High** Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). Percent passing is rounded up to the nearest half percent. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program Table 13. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent Passing* for the Class of 2007, at End of Grade 9, by LEA 2004 LEA Performance 32 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 State Percent Passing >=..9. 5 Clover Garden**, Franklin Academy**, Kestrel Heights**, Lincoln Charter**, River Mill Academy** >=..9. 5 Raleigh Charter HS** >=..9. 5 Gray Stone Day**, Pender >=95 Mount Airy City >=..9. 5 McDowell >=95 Carteret, East Wake Academy**, Granville, Transylvania, Woods Charter** >=95 Clinton City, Macon, Onslow, Polk 94.5 Ashe, Elkin City, Mooresville City 94.0 Edenton/Chowan 93.5 Cherokee, Person, Randolph 93.0 Graham, Surry 92.5 Haywood, Pamlico, Pitt, Sampson, Watauga 92.0 Asheboro City, Catawba, Chatham, Davie, Stanly 91.5 Alexander, Alleghany, Buncombe, Cabarrus, Camden, Hyde, Kannapolis City, New Hanover, Union 91.0 Avery, Craven, Currituck, Dare, Johnston 90.5 Stokes, Thomas Jefferson** 90.0 Cleveland, Lee, Lenoir 89.5 Burke, Columbus, Gates, Laurinburg Homework**, Lincoln, Martin, Rockingham 89.0 Davidson, Yadkin 88.5 Beaufort, Brunswick, Henderson, Iredell-Statesville, Rutherford, Scotland, Wilkes 2003 State 88.0 Kings Mountain City, Moore, Roanoke Rapids City 2001 State 87.5 Jackson, Perquimans, Yancey 87.0 Asheville City, Franklin, Mitchell 2000, 2004 State 86.5 Gaston, Nash-Rocky Mount, Warren 2002 State 86.0 Duplin, Elizabeth City/Pasquotank 85.5 Orange 1998 State 85.0 Alamance-Burlington, Bladen, Caldwell, Chapel Hill-Carrboro City, Madison, Wake, Weldon City 1997,1999 State 84.5 Winston-Salem/Forsyth 84.0 Greene, Jones 83.5 Clay, Harnett, Swain, Wilson 83.0 Hoke, Newton-Conover City 82.5 Charlotte/Mecklenburg, Guilford, Montgomery, Richmond 82....0 Vance 81.0 Rowan-Salisbury, Shelby City 80.5 Caswell 8.0...0 Durham, Wayne 78.5 Anson, Hickory City 78.0 Cumberland 77.5 Northampton, Washington 77.0 Edgecombe 76.5 Halifax, Lexington City, Whiteville City 7.6...0 Thomasville City 7.5...0 Robeson 74.0 Tyrrell 7.3...5 Cape Lookout Marine** 7.2...5 Bertie 7.1...0 Rocky Mount Prep Sch** 70.0 Kennedy Charter** 6.9...5 Hertford 6.4...5 Provisions Academy** 6.0...0 Lakeside School** 4.4...5 Crossroads Charter** 3.3...5 Crossnore Academy** 2.6...0 Laurinburg Charter** 2.5...0 J.H. Baker Jr High** 6....5 C.G. Woodson** *** Grandfather Academy** Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). Percent passing is rounded up to the nearest half percent. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix. ***Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Table 14. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent Passing* for the Class of 2006, at End of Grade 10, by LEA 2004 LEA Performance 33 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 State Percent Passing >=95 Gray Stone Day**, Thomas Jefferson**, Woods Charter** >=95 Raleigh Charter HS** >=95 Davie >=95 Mount Airy City, Pamlico, Person >=95 Asheboro City, Granville, Pender, Polk >=95 Alexander, Asheville City, Carteret, Chatham, Haywood, McDowell, Scotland, Wataug >=95 Clinton City, Onslow, Pitt, Surry >=95 Elkin City, Johnston, Macon, Perquimans, Randolph >=95 Cherokee, Edenton/Chowan, New Hanover, Rutherford, Weldon City, Yancey >=95 Ashe, Cabarrus, Camden, Kings Mountain City, Mooresville City, Sampson, Stokes, Transylvania 94.5 Buncombe, Catawba, Currituck, Davidson, Jackson, Martin, Richmond 94.0 Clay, Craven, Iredell-Statesville, River Mill Academy**, Yadkin 93.5 Alamance-Burlington, Brunswick, Lincoln, Newton-Conover City, Roanoke Rapids City, Stanly Swain, Tyrrell, Union 93.0 Beaufort, Cleveland, Dare, Kannapolis City, Nash-Rocky Mount, Thomasville City, Vance, Warren 92.5 Caswell, East Wake Academy**, Gates, Madison 92.0 Bladen, Halifax, Henderson, Lenoir, Mitchell, Rockingham, Wilkes 2001,2003,2004 State 91.5 Franklin, Hyde, Lee, Moore 2002 State 91.0 Charlotte/Mecklenburg, Graham, Jones, Orange 1997,1998 State 90.5 Duplin, Elizabeth City/Pasquotank, Hickory City, Winston-Salem/Forsyth 2000 State 90.0 Columbus, Hoke, Montgomery 89.5 Burke, Cape Lookout Marine**, Gaston, Greene, Wake 1999 State 89.0 Guilford, Harnett 88.5 Chapel Hill-Carrboro City, Durham 88.0 Caldwell, Lexington City, Washington 87.5 Alleghany, Avery, Edgecombe, Northampton 87.0 Rowan-Salisbury, Wilson 86.5 Robeson 85.5 Wayne 85.0 Cumberland 84.5 Lincoln Charter**, Whiteville City 83.5 Anson 81.0 Bertie 78.5 Hertford 78.0 Kennedy Charter** 77.0 Rocky Mount Prep Sch** 76.5 Laurinburg Homework** 73.0 Shelby City 57.5 J.H. Baker Jr High** 4.4...0 Crossroads Charter** 3.7...0 Laurinburg Charter** <.=..5 C.G. Woodson** *** Crossnore Academy**, Grandfather Academy**, Lakeside School**, Provisions Academy Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). Percent passing is rounded up to the nearest half percent. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix. ***Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Table 15. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent Passing* for the Class of 2005, at End of Grade 11, by LEA 2004 LEA Performance 34 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 State Percent Passing >=95 East Wake Academy**, Graham, Mount Airy City, Provisions Academy**, Raleigh Charter HS**, River Mill Academy**, Thomas Jefferson**, Woods Charter** >=95 Asheboro City, Carteret, Orange, Person >=95 Kings Mountain City, Macon, McDowell >=95 Beaufort, Granville, Haywood, Kannapolis City, Onslow, Pamlico, Pender, Pitt, Randolph, Vance >=95 Ashe, Asheville City, Chatham, Cherokee, Clay, Iredell-Statesville, Surry, Thomasville City >=95 Alamance-Burlington, Alexander, Cabarrus, Clinton City, Davie, Elkin City, Lincoln, Watauga, Wilson >=95 Buncombe, Nash-Rocky Mount, Sampson, Yancey >=95 Elizabeth City/Pasquotank, Johnston, Madison, Roanoke Rapids City, Warren >=95 Brunswick, Caswell, Jackson, Lee, Martin, New Hanover, Polk, Union >=95 Davidson, Henderson, Scotland, Stanly, Transylvania, Washington, Weldon City, Yadkin 1998,2003 State >=95 Bladen, Camden, Catawba, Columbus, Gates, Hickory City, Mooresville City, Perquimans, Rockingham, Rutherford 2001,2004 State 94.5 Avery, Chapel Hill-Carrboro City, Craven, Dare, Gaston, Hyde, Stokes 2002 State 94.0 Caldwell, Cleveland, Currituck, Hoke, Moore, Richmond 93.5 Charlotte/Mecklenburg, Newton-Conover City, Swain 1999,2000 State 93.0 Burke, Duplin, Franklin, Greene 92.5 Cumberland, Harnett, Lenoir, Wake 92.0 Edenton/Chowan, Mitchell, Montgomery, Winston-Salem/Forsyth 91.5 Rowan-Salisbury, Whiteville City, Wilkes 91.0 Guilford, Northampton 90.5 Robeson, Wayne 90.0 Anson, Hertford, Tyrrell 89.5 Durham, Edgecombe 89.0 Bertie, Lexington City 88....5 Shelby City 87.5 Jones 87....0 Alleghany 85.0 Cape Lookout Marine** 84....5 Halifax 83....0 Crossroads Charter** 82....0 Laurinburg Homework** 78....0 J.H. Baker Jr High** 53....0 Laurinburg Charter** 31....0 Crossnore Academy** *** C.G. Woodson**, Kennedy Charter**, Kestrel Heights**, Lakeside School** Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). Percent passing is rounded up to the nearest half percent. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix. ***Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Table 16. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent Passing* for the Class of 2004, at End of Grade 12, by LEA 2004 LEA Performance 35 Student Performance by Class, Ethnicity, and Gender by LEA and Region (former Technical Assistance Center Configuration) 37 Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Number Passing Final Membership Percent Passing Number Passing Final Membership Percent Passing Number Passing Final Membership Percent Passing Number Passing Final Membership Percent Passing Number Passing Final Membership Percent Passing Number Passing Final Membership Percent Passing Number Passing Final Membership Percent Passing State 85,116 109,466 77.8 1,111 1,550 71.7 1,775 2,118 83.8 20,834 33,075 63.0 3,588 6,080 59.0 1,531 1,879 81.5 56,277 64,764 86.9 Western Region 6,426 7,869 81.7 82 100 82.0 42 50 84.0 319 520 61.3 175 305 57.4 100 128 78.1 5,708 6,766 84.4 Buncombe 1,694 2,098 80.7 11 14 78.6 10 16 62.5 82 138 59.4 41 85 48.2 46 56 82.1 1,504 1,789 84.1 F Delany New School** 11 13 84.6 * 0 * * 0 * * 2 * * 1 * * 0 * 9 10 90.0 Evergreen Community** 37 41 90.2 * 0 * * 1 * * 3 * * 2 * * 2 * 30 33 90.9 Asheville City 202 276 73.2 * 0 * * 1 * 68 128 53.1 7 10 70 5 7 71.4 121 130 93.1 Cherokee 259 286 90.6 * 7 * * 2 * * 7 * * 3 * * 4 * 237 263 90.1 Clay 86 94 91.5 * 0 * * 1 * * 0 * * 1 * * 1 * 83 91 91.2 Graham 77 93 82.8 9 10 90.0 * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * 68 83 81.9 Haywood 508 615 82.6 * 4 * * 2 * 5 6 83.3 9 12 75.0 2 5 40.0 487 586 83.1 Henderson 855 1,024 83.5 * 3 * 8 9 88.9 20 37 54.1 55 89 61.8 10 17 58.8 759 869 87.3 Mountain Community** 13 18 72.2 * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * 13 18 72.2 Jackson 260 325 80.0 21 27 77.8 * 0 * * 1 * 3 9 33.3 * 5 * 230 283 81.3 Summit Charter** 14 16 87.5 * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * 14 16 87.5 Macon 245 305 80.3 * 2 * * 2 * 1 5 20.0 2 10 20.0 * 3 * 236 283 83.4 Madison 143 197 72.6 * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * 3 7 42.9 * 0 * 140 190 73.7 McDowell 439 519 84.6 * 2 * * 8 * 17 23 73.9 12 21 57.1 * 4 * 398 461 86.3 Mitchell 169 204 82.8 * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * * 4 ** * 1 * 166 199 83.4 Polk 174 201 86.6 * 0 * * 0 * 14 16 87.5 8 12 66.7 * 3 * 149 170 87.6 Rutherford 636 827 76.9 * 0 * * 2 * 89 136 65.4 16 25 64.0 12 13 92.3 517 651 79.4 Thomas Jefferson** 52 62 83.9 * 0 * * 0 * * 2 * * 0 * * 1 * 51 59 86.4 Swain 124 156 79.5 24 31 77.4 * 1 * * 0 * * 4 * * 1 * 95 119 79.8 Transylvania 252 298 84.6 * 0 * 4 5 80.0 10 14 71.4 * 4 * 4 5 80.0 232 270 85.9 Brevard Academy** 4 5 80.0 * 0 * * 0 * * 1 * * 0 * * 0 * * 4 * Yancey 172 196 87.8 * 0 * * 0 * * 1 * 5 6 83.3 * 0 * 166 189 87.8 Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). *Performance data are not reported when final membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. The ethnic categories may not sum to total final membership and total number passing because ethnic category may not have been coded on some student answer sheets. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Total Multi-Racial White Table 12a. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent Passing1 for the Class of 2008, at End of Grade 8, by LEA and Ethnicity Western Region American Indian Asian Black Hispanic 39 Membership Percent Passing Membership Percent Passing Membership Percent Passing Membership Percent Passing Membership Percent Passing Membership Percent Passing Membership Percent Passing State 109,466 77.8 53,284 80.6 56,182 75.1 88,046 79.8 20,102 70.1 1,049 56.7 688 60.6 Western Region 7,869 81.7 3,727 84.3 4,142 79.3 6,615 82.1 1,095 82.4 135 62.2 21 47.6 Buncombe 2,098 80.7 1,015 83.4 1,083 78.2 2,094 80.9 0 * 0 * 4 * Asheville City 276 73.2 126 76.2 150 70.7 276 73.2 0 * 0 * 0 * F Delany New School** 13 84.6 4 * 9 88.9 10 90.0 0 * 3 * 0 * Evergreen Community** 41 90.2 12 * 29 86.2 1 * 0 * 40 92.5 0 * Cherokee 286 90.6 127 92.1 159 89.3 211 89.6 75 93.3 0 * 0 * Clay 94 91.5 42 88.1 52 94.2 94 91.5 0 * 0 * 0 * Graham 93 82.8 44 >=95 49 71.4 93 82.8 0 * 0 * 0 * Haywood 615 82.6 286 83.2 329 82.1 556 86.7 0 * 56 44.6 3 * Henderson 1,024 83.5 460 86.1 564 81.4 1,013 83.7 0 * 0 * 11 63.6 40 Mountain Community** 18 72.2 6 33.3 12 91.7 0 * 0 * 18 72.2 0 * Jackson 325 80.0 156 83.3 169 76.9 28 64.3 287 84.0 6 * 2 * Summit Charter** 16 87.5 8 * 8 75.0 16 87.5 0 * 0 * 0 * Macon 305 80.3 137 89.8 168 72.6 27 88.9 278 79.5 0 * 0 * Madison 197 72.6 92 76.1 105 69.5 197 72.6 0 * 0 * 0 * McDowell 519 84.6 260 86.2 259 83.0 519 84.6 0 * 0 * 0 * Mitchell 204 82.8 105 81.9 99 83.8 0 * 204 82.8 0 * 0 * Polk 201 86.6 106 84.9 95 88.4 201 86.6 0 * 0 * 0 * Rutherford 827 76.9 387 80.4 440 73.9 826 76.9 1 * 0 * 0 * Thomas Jefferson** 62 83.9 28 82.1 34 85.3 55 89.1 0 * 7 42.9 0 * Swain 156 79.5 76 85.5 80 73.8 0 * 156 79.5 0 * 0 * Transylvania 298 84.6 144 88.2 154 81.2 297 84.8 0 * 0 * 0 * Brevard Academy** 5 80.0 2 * 3 * 0 * 5 80.0 0 * 0 * Yancey 196 87.8 104 87.5 92 88.0 101 94.1 89 80.9 5 80.0 1 * Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). *Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. The gender categories may not sum to total membership because gender category may not have been coded on some student answer sheets. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this table. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Table 12b. 2003-04 North Carolina Competency Tests Percent Passing the Standard1 for the Class of 2008, at the End of Grade 8, by LEA, Gender, Title I, and Migrant Students Western Region Total Female Male Not Served by Title I Schoolwide Title I Program Targeted Assistance Migrant Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Number Passing Final Membership Percent Passing Number Passing Final Membership Percent Passing Number Passing Final Membership Percent Passing Number Passing Final Membership Percent Passing Number Passing Final Membership Percent Passing Number Passing Final Membership Percent Passing Number Passing Final Membership Percent Passing State 85,116 109,466 77.8 1,111 1,550 71.7 1,775 2,118 83.8 20,834 33,075 63.0 3,588 6,080 59.0 1,531 1,879 81.5 56,277 64,764 86.9 Northwest Region 13,674 16,994 80.5 22 37 59.5 358 430 83.3 1,664 2,728 61.0 568 987 57.5 214 269 79.6 10,848 12,543 86.5 Alexander 326 400 81.5 * 0 * 14 19 73.7 17 28 60.7 7 13 53.8 * 2 * 287 338 84.9 Alleghany 117 133 88.0 * 0 * * 0 * * 1 * 4 7 57.1 * 0 * 112 125 89.6 Ashe 210 228 92.1 * 2 * * 1 * * 1 * * 4 * * 2 * 201 218 92.2 Avery 125 151 82.8 * 1 * * 0 * * 0 * 3 8 37.5 * 0 * 122 142 85.9 Grandfather Academy** 6 7 85.7 * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * 6 7 85.7 Crossnore Academy** * 4 * * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * * 4 * Burke 982 1,258 78.1 * 1 * 100 119 84.0 52 85 61.2 33 58 56.9 14 18 77.8 783 977 80.1 Caldwell 870 1,025 84.9 * 0 * * 8 * 51 72 70.8 19 32 59.4 15 18 83.3 777 895 86.8 Catawba 1,141 1,355 84.2 * 3 * 79 97 81.4 59 93 63.4 38 56 67.9 24 28 85.7 939 1,078 87.1 Hickory City 297 381 78.0 * 0 * 26 32 81.3 66 101 65.3 21 38 55.3 7 13 53.8 177 197 89.8 Newton-Conover City 200 241 83.0 * 0 * 18 19 94.7 27 45 60.0 16 23 69.6 * 6 * 133 148 89.9 Davidson 1,367 1,624 84.2 5 8 62.5 7 10 70.0 35 50 70.0 28 40 70.0 9 11 81.8 1,283 1,505 85.2 Lexington City 149 233 63.9 * 1 * 13 19 68.4 61 103 59.2 17 35 48.6 * 8 * 50 67 74.6 Thomasville City 131 202 64.9 * 0 * * 0 * 60 100 60.0 15 25 60.0 4 7 57.1 52 70 74.3 Davie 432 493 87.6 * 0 * * 0 * 32 43 74.4 11 19 57.9 8 10 80.0 381 421 90.5 Winston-Salem/Forsyth 2,829 3,883 72.9 7 12 58.3 31 36 86.1 823 1,442 57.1 153 335 45.7 72 91 79.1 1,743 1,967 88.6 Quality Education** 20 24 83.3 * 0 * * 0 * 20 24 83.3 * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * Downtown Middle** 81 92 88.0 * 1 * * 0 * 44 52 84.6 * 1 * * 3 * 33 35 94.3 C.G. Woodson** 18 22 81.8 * 0 * * 0 * 17 20 85.0 * 2 * * 0 * * 0 * Forsyth Academies** 27 36 75.0 * 1 * * 0 * 10 16 62.5 * 2 * * 0 * 15 17 88.2 Iredell-Statesville 1,224 1,481 82.6 * 4 * 32 37 86.5 145 240 60.4 65 89 73.0 8 13 61.5 971 1,098 88.4 American Ren. Middle** 36 44 81.8 * 0 * * 0 * * 4 * * 1 * * 0 * 34 39 87.2 Success Institute** 2 5 40.0 * 0 * * 0 * 2 5 40.0 * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * Mooresville City 327 384 85.2 * 0 * 6 7 85.7 45 69 65.2 8 10 80.0 * 7 * 261 291 89.7 Stokes 496 599 82.8 * 1 * * 1 * 18 29 62.1 7 9 77.8 7 8 87.5 462 551 83.8 Surry 607 735 82.6 * 1 * * 3 * 14 27 51.9 39 55 70.9 * 6 * 545 643 84.8 Elkin City 84 101 83.2 * 0 * * 1 * * 4 * 8 17 47.1 * 1 * 71 78 91.0 Mount Airy City 143 155 92.3 * 0 * * 5 * 14 19 73.7 * 4 * * 0 * * 127 >=95 Watauga 345 376 91.8 * 0 * 4 5 80.0 * 4 * * 7 71.4 8 10 80.0 324 350 92.6 Wilkes 688 808 85.1 * 0 * 9 10 90.0 26 30 86.7 26 38 68.4 * 5 * 622 725 85.8 Bridges** 5 10 50.0 * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * 5 10 50.0 Yadkin 387 504 76.8 * 1 * * 1 * 16 21 76.2 34 59 57.6 * 2 * 336 420 80.0 Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). *Performance data are not reported when final membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. The ethnic categories may not sum to total final membership and total number passing because ethnic category may not have been coded on some student answer sheets. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Table 12c. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard Percent Passing1 for the Class of 2008, at End of Grade 8, by LEA and Ethnicity Northwest Region Total American Indian Asian Black Hispanic Multi-Racial White 41 Membership Percent Passing Membership Percent Passing Membership Percent Passing Membership Percent Passing Membership Percent Passing Membership Percent Passing Membership Percent Passing State 109,466 77.8 53,284 80.6 56,182 75.1 88,046 79.8 20,102 70.1 1,049 56.7 688 60.6 Northwest Region 16,994 80.5 8,206 83.1 8,788 78.0 14,767 82.1 1,553 72.8 641 62.9 28 53.6 Alexander 400 81.5 190 82.1 210 81.0 352 87.2 0 * 48 39.6 0 * Alleghany 133 88.0 62 88.7 71 87.3 0 * 133 88.0 0 * 1 * Ashe 228 92.1 100 >=95 128 89.1 228 92.1 0 * 0 * 0 * Avery 151 82.8 62 83.9 89 82.0 0 * 151 82.8 0 * 0 * Grandfather Academy** 7 85.7 3 * 4 * 0 * 7 85.7 0 * 0 * Crossnore Academy** 4 * 3 * 1 * 0 * 4 * 0 * 0 * Burke 1,258 78.1 619 81.4 639 74.8 1,257 78.1 0 * 0 * 0 * Caldwell 1,025 84.9 505 87.7 520 82.1 504 86.7 521 83.1 0 * 0 * Catawba 1,355 84.2 669 84.6 686 83.8 1,355 84.2 0 * 0 * 0 * Hickory City 381 78.0 197 78.2 184 77.7 1 * 176 71.6 204 83.8 0 * Newton-Conover City 241 83.0 121 82.6 120 83.3 241 83.0 0 * 0 * 0 * Davidson 1,624 84.2 801 87.0 823 81.4 1,624 84.2 0 * 0 * 0 * 42 Lexington City 233 63.9 109 67.0 124 61.3 0 * 233 63.9 0 * 0 * Thomasville City 202 64.9 105 65.7 97 63.9 202 64.9 0 * 0 * 0 * Davie 493 87.6 252 87.7 241 87.6 478 89.1 0 * 15 40.0 0 * Winston-Salem/Forsyth 3,883 72.9 1,860 75.6 2,023 70.3 3,307 77.0 250 43.2 324 54.0 0 * Quality Education** 24 83.3 8 * 16 75.0 0 * 24 83.3 0 * 0 * Downtown Middle** 92 88.0 41 90.2 51 86.3 88 90.9 0 * 4 * 0 * C.G. Woodson** 22 81.8 13 92.3 9 66.7 0 * 0 * 22 81.8 0 * Forsyth Academies** 36 75.0 23 78.3 13 69.2 22 81.8 0 * 14 64.3 0 * Iredell-Statesville 1,481 82.6 665 86.9 816 79.2 1,474 82.9 6 16.7 0 * 1 * American Ren. Middle** 44 81.8 21 76.2 23 87.0 44 81.8 0 * 0 * 0 * Success Institute** 5 40.0 2 * 3 * 0 * 0 * 5 40.0 0 * Mooresville City 384 85.2 211 89.1 173 80.3 384 85.2 0 * 0 * 0 * Stokes 599 82.8 268 86.6 331 79.8 599 82.8 0 * 0 * 0 * Surry 735 82.6 327 89.9 408 76.7 726 82.8 4 * 0 * 4 * Elkin City 101 83.2 54 83.3 47 83.0 101 83.2 0 * 0 * 0 * Mount Airy City 155 92.3 74 93.2 81 91.4 155 92.3 0 * 0 * 0 * Watauga 376 91.8 166 92.8 210 91.0 331 92.1 44 88.6 1 * 0 * Wilkes 808 85.1 407 87.7 401 82.5 791 85.6 0 * 0 * 17 64.7 Bridges** 10 50.0 5 60.0 5 40.0 10 50.0 0 * 0 * 0 * Yadkin 504 76.8 263 80.6 241 72.6 493 77.9 0 * 4 * 5 40.0 Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). *Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. The gender categories may not sum to total membership because gender category may not have been coded on some student answer sheets. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this table. Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program. Table 12d. 2003-04 North Carolina Competency Tests Percent Passing the Standard1 for the Class of 2008, at the End of Grade 8, by LEA, Gender, Title I, and Migrant Students Northwest Region Total Female Male Not Served by Title I Schoolwide Title I Program Targeted Assistance Migrant Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 Number Passing Final Membership Percent Passing Number Passing Final Membership Percent Passing Number Passing Final Membership Percent Passing Number Passing Final Membership Percent Passing Number Passing Final Membership Percent Passing Number Passing Final Membership Percent Passing Number Passing Final Membership Percent Passing State 85,116 109,466 77.8 1,111 1,550 71.7 1,775 2,118 83.8 20,834 33,075 63.0 3,588 6,080 59.0 1,531 1,879 81.5 56,277 64,764 86.9 Southwest Region 18,965 24,434 77.6 169 246 68.7 478 570 83.9 4,816 7,746 62.2 879 1,445 60.8 232 274 84.7 12,391 14,153 87.6 Anson 214 337 63.5 * 0 * 4 6 66.7 107 209 51.2 * 1 * * 0 * 103 121 85.1 Cabarrus 1,531 1,782 85.9 9 10 90.0 * 21 >=95 188 276 68.1 80 127 63.0 24 27 88.9 1,210 1,321 91.6 Kannapolis City 253 371 68.2 * 1 * * 4 * 54 110 49.1 23 40 57.5 9 10 90.0 164 206 79.6 Cleveland 635 763 83.2 * 1 * * 3 * 141 187 75.4 9 13 69.2 10 11 90.9 472 548 86.1 Kings Mountain City 349 411 84.9 * 0 * * 8 * 71 99 71.7 4 5 80.0 * 9 * 257 290 88.6 Shelby City 176 259 68.0 * 0 * * 0 * 91 154 59.1 * 2 * * 3 * 83 100 83.0 Gaston 1,970 2,609 75.5 6 7 85.7 40 44 90.9 302 520 58.1 61 110 55.5 15 22 68.2 1,546 1,906 81.1 Piedmont Community** 18 22 81.8 * 0 * * 0 * * 1 * * 2 * * 0 * 17 19 89.5 Hoke 355 512 69.3 42 70 60.0 * 0 * 167 256 65.2 17 33 51.5 12 14 85.7 117 139 84.2 Lincoln 763 920 82.9 * 2 * * 2 * 65 92 70.7 41 58 70.7 10 12 83.3 643 754 85.3 Lincoln Charter** 38 41 92.7 * 1 * * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * * 1 * 36 39 92.3 Charlotte/Mecklenburg 6,581 8,731 75.4 28 38 73.7 313 373 83.9 2,507 4,000 62.7 405 692 58.5 57 65 87.7 3,271 3,563 91.8 Kennedy Charter** 3 12 25.0 * 0 * * 0 * 3 11 27.3 * 1 * * 0 * * 0 * Lake Norman** * 148 >=95 * 0 * * 4 * 6 7 85.7 * 0 * * 1 * * 136 >=95 Sugar Creek** 22 48 45.8 * 0 * * 2 * 19 44 43.2 * 0 * * 0 * * 2 * Metrolina** * 12 * * 0 * * 2 * * 1 * * 0 * * 0 * * 9 * Montgomery 258 365 70.7 * 2 * * 9 * 54 100 54.0 32 48 66.7 * 4 * 159 202 78.7 Moore 861 1,025 84.0 10 13 76.9 * 4 * 168 243 69.1 39 52 75.0 15 18 83.3 626 695 90.1 Academy of Moore County** 20 30 66.7 * 0 * * 0 * 6 9 66.7 * 0 * * 1 * 14 20 70.0 Richmond 502 663 75.7 17 23 73.9 4 5 80.0 163 270 60.4 18 19 94.7 * 8 * 292 338 86.4 Rowan-Salisbury 1,361 1,754 77.6 6 9 66.7 12 20 60.0 226 376 60.1 47 73 64.4 18 22 81.8 1,052 1,254 83.9 Scotland 402 546 73.6 38 58 65.5 6 7 85.7 145 232 62.5 * 3 * 7 9 77.8 204 237 86.1 Laurinburg Homework** * 4 * * 2 * * 0 * * 2 * * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * Stanly 691 842 82.1 * 0 * 28 37 75.7 86 123 69.9 15 21 71.4 9 13 69.2 553 648 85.3 Union 1,804 2,227 81.0 7 9 77.8 16 19 84.2 246 424 58 84 145 57.9 22 24 91.7 1,429 1,606 89.0 Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). *Performance data are not reported when final membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed. The ethnic categories may not sum to total final membership and total number passing because ethnic category may not have been coded on some student answer sheets. **Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix. Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in |
OCLC number | 38417822 |