Report of student performance on the North Carolina competency standard

              Public Schools of North Carolina
State Board of Education
Department of Public Instruction
Accountability Services/Test Development Section
Raleigh NC 27601-2825
www.ncpublicschools.org/accountability/testing
Reporting on the Classes of 2000 - 2008
Published March 2005
Report of
Student Performance
on the North Carolina
Competency Standard
2003-04
STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION
HOWARD N. LEE
Chairman
Raleigh
JANE P. NORWOOD
Vice Chair
Charlotte
KATHY A. TAFT
Greenville
MICHELLE HOWARD-VITAL
Wilmington
EDGAR D. MURPHY
Durham
EVELYN B. MONROE
West End
MARIA T. PALMER
Chapel Hill
ROBERT “TOM” SPEED
Boone
WAYNE MCDEVITT
Asheville
JOHN TATE III
Charlotte
BEVERLY PERDUE
Lieutenant Governor
New Bern
RICHARD MOORE
State Treasurer
Kittrell
NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION
Patricia N. Willoughby, State Superintendent
301 N. Wilmington Street :: Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2825 :: www.ncpublicschools.org
In compliance with federal laws, N C Public Schools administers all state-operated educational programs, employment activities and admissions without discrimination
because of race, religion, national or ethnic orgin, color, age, military service, disability, or gender, except where exemption is appropriate and allowed by law.
Inquiries or complaints should be directed to:
Dr. Elsie C. Leak, Associate Superintendent
Office of Curriculum and School Reform Services
6307 Mail Services Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-6307
Telephone (919) 807-3761; fax (919) 807-3767
Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04
Report of Student Performance
on the
North Carolina Competency Standard
2003-04
March 2005
Public Schools of North Carolina
State Board of Education
Department of Public Education
Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program
Raleigh NC 27601-2825
www.ncpublicschools.org/accountability/testing
Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04
Acknowledgments
This report is the collaborative work of many individuals. The North Carolina Testing Program
is conducted by the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction (NCDPI), Division of
Accountability Services. Technical support services for the program are implemented in
collaboration with the Center for Urban Affairs and Community Services at North Carolina State
University under the Technical Outreach for Public Schools (TOPS) program. Mildred
Bazemore, Chief of the North Carolina Test Development Section, and Charles Lanier,
Educational Research and Evaluation Consultant in the North Carolina Test Development
Section, directed the design of the report. Staff at TOPS conducted the required analyses and
report production.
At TOPS we thank Alissa Bernholc, Betty Marsh, Stephen Ward, Anthony Wells, and Karin
Wolfe for assistance in creating tables and figures, verifying data accuracy, and coordinating
report editing and production. At DPI, we thank Mildred Bazemore and Charles Lanier for
assistance in preparing all phases of this publication.
We also thank the personnel in the state’s Regional Accountability Centers and Local Education
Agencies for their conscientious efforts in administering the tests and verifying the data.
This publication and the information contained within must not be used for personal or financial gain. North
Carolina LEA school officials and teachers, parents, and students may download and duplicate this publication for
instructional and educational purposes only. Others may not duplicate this publication without prior written
permission from the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction (NCDPI) Division of Accountability
Services/North Carolina Testing Program.
© 2005 All rights reserved. This document may not be reproduced by any means, in
whole or in part, without prior written permission from the North Carolina Department of
Public Instruction, Division of Accountability Services, North Carolina Test Development
Section, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27601-2825.
Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04
Summary
Report of Student Performance
on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04
Historical
Background
• North Carolina’s belief that all children can learn is consistent
with the requirement that all students must be provided
academic challenges in order to ensure that every child has an
opportunity to realize his or her potential. Consistent with this
belief has been an assessment requirement to measure what
students know and are able to do as graduates of North
Carolina public schools. To assure that students possess the
knowledge and skills necessary to function independently and
successfully in assuming the responsibilities of citizenship,
North Carolina has required students to meet a graduation
testing standard since 1978 for the class of 1981. Initially the
competency testing program focused on competencies that
students need to possess as a minimum in the areas of reading,
mathematics, and grammar in order to graduate from high
school. In 1985-86, the program was expanded to include a
minimum skills writing component which was eliminated
1988-89. Effective with the graduates of 1998, students were
expected to meet a higher standard in reading and
mathematics. The results in this report focus on student
performance on the higher standard.
• Note: The State Board of Education approved revisions to the
North Carolina Mathematics Standard Course of Study at the
May 1998 monthly meeting. Effective with the 2000-01
school year, North Carolina mathematics tests measure the
goals and objectives from the 1998 curriculum. Prior to the
1998 revision, the state mathematics curriculum had been
revised in 1989 (grades K-8) and 1992 (grades 9-12). Due to
the 1998 revisions in the mathematics curriculum and the
revised tests, the mathematics developmental scale scores were
revised for the grade 3 pretest and end-of-grade tests. The
revised mathematics developmental scale scores adopted by
the State Board of Education in September 2001 are used to
report student performance in this publication beginning with
2000-01 data. Any mathematics scales reported prior to the
2000-01 school year are not to be compared without using the
conversion tables published September 2001. The end-of-course
mathematics tests (Algebra I, Algebra II, and
Geometry) retained the scale previously used.
Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04
Background • The class of 1998 was the first class required by State Board of
Education policy to meet a higher competency standard in the
areas of reading and mathematics in order to receive a high
school diploma. The students graduating at the end of the
1997-98 school year were required to demonstrate grade-level
proficiency (Achievement Level III or IV) on the eighth-grade
reading and mathematics tests, the competency tests, or other
approved screens.
• Data used to compile this report were provided by the LEAs
from the Student Information Management System (SIMS) and
Masterbuild data files. The data files were generated using test
results from students up to July 15, 2004.
Key Findings • The percentage of students passing the competency standard
increases with each grade although the number of students in
membership generally decreases as students progress through
the grades. Of eighth-graders, 77.8 percent passed the standard
in the 2003-04 school year, while 78.1 percent of ninth graders,
86.1 percent of tenth graders, 91.4 percent of eleventh graders,
and 94.1 percent of twelfth-graders met the requirement.
• There are fewer differences in percent passing by ethnicity at
grade 12 with better than 88.6 percent of all subgroups passing.
At the end of grade 8, however, students in the Hispanic,
Black, and American Indian subgroups pass at a lower rate
than students in the White, Asian, and Multi-Racial subgroups.
This pattern holds for the classes of 2006 and 2007 with
between 30.9 percent and 51.3 percent of Hispanic, Black, and
American Indian students not passing the competency standard
by the end of grade 9.
Report of Student Performance on the Competency Standard, 2003-04
Report of Student Performance
on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04
Table of Contents
Introduction.....................................................................................................................i
Background and Findings ................................................................................................ii
Statewide Number of Students Tested and Number Not Tested by Grade......................1
Percent Passing by Class..................................................................................................6
Percent Passing by Ethnicity and Class ...........................................................................10
Performance of Exceptional, Limited English Proficient, and Title I Students,
Across Grades 8-12........................................................................................................ 15
Performance of Students with Disabilities, Grades 8-12 ............................................... 16
Performance of Limited English Proficient Students, Grades 8-12............................... 19
Percent of LEAs and Charter Schools in Each Percent Passing Category by Class...... 20
Student Performance by Class, Ethnicity, and Gender, by LEA and Region................ 37
Sample Questions for the North Carolina Competency Tests ....................................... 101
Answers to Sample Tests and Notes.............................................................................. 109
Appendix....................................................................................................................... 111
List of North Carolina Charter Schools, 2003-04..................................................... 113
Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04
Report of Student Performance
on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04
Introduction
The Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard
provides information on student performance at the state, regional, and school system
levels for students in the classes of 2000-2008. The data used to compile this report were
provided by each LEA represented and are managed at the school and school system
levels. The data were collected using a variety of strategies including analyzing
electronically scored data files and reviewing masterbuild files. LEA test coordinators
submitted the data from each LEA for this report to the NCDPI, and Regional
Accountability Coordinators approved the data represented in this report.
The requirement for graduates of 1998 or beyond represents a more rigorous standard
than the minimum competency requirement implemented initially in 1978 for the class of
1981. The more recent standard implemented by the State Board of Education in 1995
requires students to demonstrate mastery of grade-level competencies in reading and
mathematics equivalent to grade 8 as described in the North Carolina Standard Course of
Study. In order to demonstrate the requirement, a student must achieve performance
equivalent to Achievement Level III or above beginning with the North Carolina End-of-
Grade Tests in Reading and Mathematics administered at the end of grade 8 and a State
Board of Education alternative (screen).
Students who fail the initial screen at grade 8 must be given at least one opportunity to
pass the test(s) beginning as early as the summer after grade 8 and each year thereafter
until the standard is met. LEAs are permitted to administer the competency tests in the
summer, fall, and spring of each year (and during the last month of school for seniors
only). Students are required to retake only the tests they do not pass. According to
legislation and State Board of Education policy, any students who fail to pass the
competency standard by the end of the ninth grade are given focused remedial instruction
and additional opportunities to take the test(s) up to and including the last month of the
twelfth grade. In addition, students who have failed to pass the competency standard by
the end of the last school month of the year in which the students’ class graduates, may
receive additional remedial instruction and continue to take the competency tests during
regularly scheduled testing sessions until the students reach maximum school age (21).
The purpose of this document is to report the performance of students in the classes of
2000-2008 on the more rigorous competency standard as of the 2003-04 school year.
Previously published Reports of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency
Standard displayed LEA level data in the pie chart series in this report; beginning in
2002-03, charter school data are also included. A PDF version of this report is available
at http://www.ncpublicschools.org/accountability/testing/reports.
i
Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04
Background and Findings
Background • North Carolina General Statute 115C-174.11 mandates that the
State Board of Education adopt tests or other measurement
instruments which may be used to assure that graduates of the
public high schools, and graduates of non-public high schools
supervised by the State Board of Education, possess the skills and
knowledge necessary to function independently and successfully
in assuming the responsibilities of citizenship.
Graduation
Proficiency
Guidelines
• At its February 1995 meeting, the State Board of Education
approved Grade-Level Proficiency Guidelines and Graduation
Proficiency Guidelines that include replacing the less stringent
1978 North Carolina competency standard with more rigorous
standards in reading and mathematics as measured by North
Carolina End-of-Grade (EOG) Tests.
The Current Standard • Beginning in 1994-95 with ninth graders, the higher standard
requires students to demonstrate grade eight proficiency by
performing at Achievement Level III or above on the reading and
mathematics competency tests in order to receive a North
Carolina high school diploma.
Competency
Requirement
Guidelines
• The competency requirement guidelines, as indicated in SBE
policies HSP-C-016 and HSP-N-000, were revised in 1999. These
policies include establishing Achievement Level III or above as
the standard for grades 3 through 8, and “grade-level standards at
the end of the year” for grades K through 2, respectively.
Furthermore, intervention/remediation is required for students not
meeting the standard.
Regulations Governing
the Competency Tests
• Regulations concerning the competency requirement have not
changed although the tests have been replaced effective with the
class of 1998. With regard to the competency requirements,
LEAs are legally required to:
• test students beginning no later than grade 9, (which was
changed from grade 10), effective with the passage of
Senate Bill 1125 for the 1997-98 school year;
• offer remedial instructional opportunities to students not
meeting the requirement;
• provide additional opportunities for students to retake the
tests at least one time, up to three times, per year; and,
• provide seniors with an additional opportunity to retake the
tests during the last month of school.
ii
Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04
Cut Scores for the
Competency Tests
• The Achievement Level III or above standard requires a student to
take the grade 8 end-of-grade tests in reading and mathematics or
equivalent tests given as competency tests at the high school level.
• The Achievement Level III performance on the
2003-04 EOG reading tests is scale scores at or
above 254.
• The Achievement Level III performance on the
2003-04 EOG mathematics tests is scale scores at or
above 261.
• No standard error of the mean is considered when
determining whether students meet the competency
standard for reading or mathematics.
• The mathematics operational test was implemented in 2000-01;
therefore, the mathematics cutoff scores for students who entered
the eighth grade in 2000-01 were revised. Similarly, the reading
cutoff scores were revised for students who entered the eighth
grade in 2003-04.
• The cutoff scores for students who entered
the eighth grade in 1993-94 through 1999-00 are:
Reading: at or above a scale score of 156,
Mathematics: at or above a scale score of 165.
• The cutoff scores for students who entered the
eighth grade in 2000-01 are:
Reading: at or above a scale score of 156,
Mathematics: at or above a scale score of 256.
• The cutoff scores for students who entered the
eighth grade in 2001-02 are:
Reading: at or above a scale score of 156,
Mathematics: at or above a scale score of 261.
• The cutoff scores for students who entered
the eighth grade in 2002-03 are:
Reading: at or above a scale score of 254,
Mathematics: at or above a scale score of 261.
iii
Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04
Cut Scores for the
Competency Tests
(continued)
• The cutoff scores for students who entered
the eighth grade in 2003-04 are:
Reading: at or above a scale score of 254,
Mathematics: at or above a scale score of 261.
Test Administrations
• Students who do not achieve the above scores have not met the
competency standard.
• LEAs may schedule as many as three test administrations each
school year: once in the summer, once in the fall (must
accommodate seniors graduating in December), and once in the
spring (must accommodate seniors).
• LEAs may schedule up to four test administrations per year for
seniors: summer prior to grade 12, fall, spring, and last month.
• Each student who has failed to meet the requirement must be
given at least one opportunity each year (beginning in grade nine)
to retake the test(s) though LEAs may elect to give students an
opportunity to retake the tests during each cycle.
• Accommodations are available for students with disabilities or
students who are identified as limited English proficient.
• Different equivalent forms of the tests are rotated for each of the
scheduled test administrations.
Screening on Other
Measures to Permit
Students to Satisfy the
Competency Standard
• If a student has scores from the grade 8 North Carolina EOG
reading comprehension and mathematics tests, the scores must be
used to determine whether the student has met the competency
requirements. If for some reason a student does not have such
scores, other screening(s) may occur. The screenings described
below are approved to be used for students who transfer into the
North Carolina system after grade 8.
Nationally-
Normed Tests
• Scores from a standardized, nationally-normed test, normed on a
sample representative of the public school population in 1992 or
later, may be used for competency screening. Scores from grade 8
or higher are preferred. The cut scores for screening for these
tests are:
• Reading or verbal: at or above the 50th national percentile.
• Mathematics or quantitative: at or above the 50th national
percentile.
iv
Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04
PSAT or SAT • The following PSAT or SAT scores may be used for
competency screening:
o Reading or verbal: at or above a verbal score of 40 on the
PSAT, 400 on the SAT (48 and 480 on the recentered
scale).
o Mathematics or quantitative: at or above a mathematics
score of 45 on the PSAT and 450 on the SAT (48 and 480
on the recentered scale).
Seventh Grade
End-of-Grade
Tests
• In the event that North Carolina EOG scores, scores from
nationally-normed tests, and scores from the PSAT or SAT are not
available, seventh-grade EOG scores may, as a last resort, be used
for screening purposes. Acceptable scores are the same as for
grade 8.
• The cut scores for students who entered
the eighth grade in 1993-94 through 1999-00 are:
Reading: at or above a scale score of 156,
Mathematics: at or above a scale score of 165.
• The cut scores for students who entered
the eighth grade in 2000-01 are:
Reading: at or above a scale score of 156,
Mathematics: at or above a scale score of 256.
• The cut scores for students who entered
the eighth grade in 2001-02 are:
Reading: at or above a scale score of 156,
Mathematics: at or above a scale score of 261.
• The cut scores for students who entered
the eighth grade in 2002-03 are:
Reading: at or above a scale score of 254,
Mathematics: at or above a scale score of 261.
• The cut scores for students who entered
the eighth grade in 2003-04 are:
Reading: at or above a scale score of 254,
Mathematics: at or above a scale score of 261.
v
Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04
Strategies and
Interventions
Implemented to
Increase Performance
• The North Carolina Department of Public Instruction (NCDPI) has
provided a North Carolina Competency Resource Guide that
provides information to educators working to provide remedial
instruction to students who have failed the tests.
• Competency student handbooks have been provided to LEAs for
students to use to get an understanding of what the tests are like
and to provide information about the requirement.
• Resources such as sample items and test information sheets and
training on how to use the competency resource guidebook have
been made available to LEAs.
• Sample grade 8 reading and mathematics test items are available
on the NCDPI/Testing Program website:
www.ncpublicschools.org/accountability/testing/eog
Data Verification • The LEAs provided the NCDPI with a pass/fail flag for each
student enrolled by submitting a “masterbuild” file in the spring
of 2004. LEAs exclude visiting, transfer, and foreign-exchange
students based on an NCDPI directive.
Data Sources • Since data became available for the 2000-01 school year, some
required reporting variables were added by merging the
“masterbuild” file with other testing files where the required
variables had been collected. For 2003-04, the merge included
grade 8 end-of-grade data from 2000-01 through 2003-04 and all
end-of-course files from 2000-01 through 2003-04. Information
from the other testing files was only applied to a student record
when the student’s last name, identification number, and gender
were identical; therefore, information was not obtained for
students where name or identification number changed or was
miscoded. Also, duplicates, when found, were removed to reflect
the most recent complete data.
State Results by
Ethnicity for
Eighth Grade
• The eighth grade end-of-grade tests in reading and mathematics
provide the first opportunity for students to meet the competency
requirement. During the 2003-04 school year, 77.8 percent of
eighth-grade students in North Carolina met the standard.
• Results by ethnicity for eighth graders varied with the White
student subgroup having the highest percent of students passing
and the Hispanic student subgroup having the lowest percent of
students passing. The percents passing for each subgroup were:
59.0 percent Hispanic, 63.0 percent Black, 71.7 percent American
Indian, 81.5 percent Multi-Racial, 83.8 percent Asian, and 86.9
vi
Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04
percent White.
State Results by
Ethnicity for
Ninth Grade
• Students who have not met the eighth-grade proficiency or screen
are required to take the North Carolina Competency Test of
Reading and Mathematics as one requirement for a North
Carolina high school diploma. According to legislation, all
students who have not achieved a passing score must be provided
the opportunity to take the competency tests in the ninth grade. In
2003-04, 78.1 percent of the students passed the competency
requirement by the end of the ninth grade. Results by ethnicity
varied with Hispanic students having the lowest percent passing
and White students have the highest percent passing by the end of
the ninth grade.
• Approximately 52.9 percent Hispanic, 65.2 percent Black, 69.1
percent American Indian, 79.8 percent Asian, 81.7 percent Multi-
Racial, and 87.6 percent White students passed the competency
requirement by the end of the ninth grade.
State Results by
Ethnicity for
Tenth Grade
• During the 2003-04 school year, approximately 86.1 percent of
the students passed the requirement by the end of the tenth grade.
• When viewing the results by ethnic group, a difference continues
to exist among the subgroups. The percents passing for each
subgroup by the end of tenth grade were: 66.8 percent Hispanic,
76.2 percent Black, 79.6 percent American Indian, 83.4 percent
Asian students, 86.9 percent Multi-Racial, and 92.4 percent
White.
State Results by
Ethnicity for Eleventh
Grade
• For the 2003-04 school year, approximately 91.4 percent of
students passed the competency standard by the end of eleventh
grade. The largest difference exists between the Hispanic
subgroup and the White subgroup. Approximately 79.1 percent of
Hispanic students passed the requirement while 94.9 percent of
White students passed the requirement by the end of the eleventh
grade.
• The percents passing for each subgroup were: 79.1 percent
Hispanic, 85.4 percent Black, 87.0 percent Asian, 89.8 percent
American Indian, 89.1 percent Multi-Racial, and 94.9 percent
White.
State Results by
Ethnicity for
Twelfth Grade
• For the 2003-04 school year, approximately 94.1 percent of
students passed the competency tests in twelfth grade. Results by
ethnicity varied with Hispanic and Black students having the
lowest percents passing and White students having the highest
percent passing by the end of the twelfth grade.
vii
Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04
State Reslults by
Ethnicity for
Twelfth Grade
(continued)
Performance of Students
with Disabilities
Performance of Students
Identified as Limited
English Proficient
• The percents passing for each subgroup were: 88.6 percent
Hispanic, 89.7 percent Black, 93.1 percent Asian, 93.1 percent
American Indian, 94.5 percent Multi-Racial, and greater than or
equal to 95.0 percent White.
• For the 2003-04 school year, 41.4 percent of the 16,982 eighth-grade
students with disabilities (including students identified only
under Section 504) met the competency standard. Also for
students with disabilities, 54.1 percent of 13,291 ninth-grade
students, 55.7 percent of 11,373 tenth-grade students, 76.9 percent
of 6,313 eleventh-grade students, and 69.3 percent of 6,784
twelfth-grade students passed.
• For students identified as limited English proficient, 37.5 percent
of 3,265 students in grade 8 met the competency standard in
2003-04. For the other grades, 68.1 percent of 2,406 students at
grade 9; 46.2 percent of 2,132 students at grade 10; 56.6 percent
of 244 students at grade 11; and 80.4 percent of 1,188 students at
grade 12, met the competency standard in 2003-04.
viii
Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04
Membership1 N Tested2 %
Tested
%
Proficient
All Students 109,466 105,355 96.2 77.8 4,111 3.8
Female 53,284 51,717 97.1 80.6 1,567 2.9
Male 56,182 53,638 95.5 75.1 2,544 4.5
American Indian 1,550 1,464 94.5 71.7 86 5.5
Asian 2,118 1,998 94.3 83.8 120 5.7
Black 33,075 31,653 95.7 63.0 1,422 4.3
Hispanic 6,080 5,335 87.7 59.0 745 12.3
Multi-Racial 1,879 1,803 96.0 81.5 76 4.0
White 64,764 63,102 97.4 86.9 1,662 2.6
Title I 21,359 20,191 94.5 69.3 1,168 5.5
Schoolwide Title I 20,102 19,005 94.5 70.1 1,097 5.5
Targeted Assistance Title I 1,049 1,015 96.8 56.7 34 3.2
Not Title I 88,046 85,141 96.7 79.8 2,905 3.3
Migrant 688 604 87.8 60.6 84 12.2
Not Migrant 108,717 104,728 96.3 77.9 3,989 3.7
Free/Reduced Lunch 44,413 42,486 95.7 64.7 1,927 4.3
Not Free/Reduced Lunch 65,053 62,869 96.6 86.7 2,184 3.4
Limited English Proficient 3,265 2,576 78.9 37.5 689 21.1
Not Limited English Proficient 106,201 102,779 96.8 79.0 3,422 3.2
Students With Disabilities 16,982 15,004 88.4 41.4 1,978 11.6
Students Without Disabilities 92,484 90,351 97.7 84.4 2,133 2.3
Students With IEPs 14,996 13,031 86.9 37.2 1,965 13.1
Students Without IEPs 94,470 92,324 97.7 84.2 2,146 2.3
Behaviorally-Emotionally Disabled 1,382 1,251 90.5 27.4 131 9.5
Hearing Impaired 122 107 87.7 47.5 15 12.3
Educable Mentally Disabled 2,657 1,961 73.8 <=5% 696 26.2
Specific Learning Disabled 7,297 7,014 96.1 50.9 283 3.9
Speech-Language Impaired 195 190 97.4 55.9 5 2.6
Visually Impaired 56 49 87.5 62.5 7 12.5
Other Health Impaired 2,368 2,196 92.7 44.7 172 7.3
Orthopedically Impaired 62 46 74.2 45.2 16 25.8
Traumatic Brain Injury 67 52 77.6 34.3 15 22.4
Autistic 316 129 40.8 22.8 187 59.2
Severely/Profoundly Mentally Disabled 62 3 4.8 * 59 95.2
Multihandicapped 124 12 9.7 * 112 90.3
Deaf-Blind 19 12 63.2 47.4 7 36.8
Trainable Mentally Disabled 269 9 3.3 * 260 96.7
Section 504 1,986 1,973 99.3 73.3 13 0.7
Notes: 1"Membership" is the total number of students on the 2003-04 Masterbuild data file.
*Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent,
or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed.
These data represent coding on the 2003-04 test documents.
% Absent/
Other
2"N Tested" represents the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated.
Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program.
Table 1. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard
Statewide Number of Students Tested and Number Not Tested,
Grade 8
Category
Not Tested
N Absent/
Other
1
Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04
Membership1 N Tested2 %
Tested
%
Proficient
All Students 119,403 111,982 93.8 78.1 7,421 6.2
Female 57,796 54,708 94.7 81.3 3,088 5.3
Male 61,607 57,274 93.0 75.0 4,333 7.0
American Indian 1,816 1,668 91.9 69.1 148 8.1
Asian 2,324 2,132 91.7 79.8 192 8.3
Black 37,228 34,263 92.0 65.2 2,965 8.0
Hispanic 7,053 5,795 82.2 52.9 1,258 17.8
Multi-Racial 1,829 1,703 93.1 81.7 126 6.9
White 69,153 66,421 96.0 87.6 2,732 4.0
Title I 1,426 1,270 89.1 50.4 156 10.9
Schoolwide Title I 879 779 88.6 55.2 100 11.4
Targeted Assistance Title I 353 315 89.2 42.8 38 10.8
Not Title I 109,098 104,806 96.1 82.4 4,292 3.9
Migrant 210 192 91.4 44.3 18 8.6
Not Migrant 110,314 105,884 96.0 82.1 4,430 4.0
Free/Reduced Lunch**
Not Free/Reduced Lunch**
Limited English Proficient 2,406 2,188 90.9 68.1 218 9.1
Not Limited English Proficient 116,997 109,794 93.8 78.3 7,203 6.2
Students With Disabilities 13,291 12,439 93.6 54.1 852 6.4
Students Without Disabilities 106,112 99,543 93.8 81.0 6,569 6.2
Students With IEPs 11,750 10,929 93.0 50.3 821 7.0
Students Without IEPs 107,653 101,053 93.9 81.1 6,600 6.1
Behaviorally-Emotionally Disabled 1,254 1,111 88.6 35.9 143 11.4
Hearing Impaired 111 106 95.5 58.6 5 4.5
Educable Mentally Disabled 1,048 867 82.7 12.9 181 17.3
Specific Learning Disabled 6,886 6,600 95.8 56.8 286 4.2
Speech-Language Impaired 115 107 93.0 53.9 8 7.0
Visually Impaired 62 58 93.5 69.4 4 6.5
Other Health Impaired 1,914 1,808 94.5 56.8 106 5.5
Orthopedically Impaired 40 38 95.0 62.5 2 5.0
Traumatic Brain Injury 40 37 92.5 40.0 3 7.5
Autistic 118 87 73.7 54.2 31 26.3
Severely/Profoundly Mentally Disabled 13 2 15.4 * 11 84.6
Multihandicapped 17 8 47.1 11.8 9 52.9
Deaf-Blind 101 94 93.1 44.6 7 6.9
Trainable Mentally Disabled 31 6 19.4 16.1 25 80.6
Section 504 1,541 1,510 98.0 83.4 31 2.0
Notes: 1"Membership" is the total number of students on the 2003-04 Masterbuild data file.
*Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent,
or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed.
**Free/ Reduced Lunch information is not collected for grades 9 and 11.
These data represent coding on the 2003-04 test documents.
% Absent/
Other
2"N Tested" represents the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated.
Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program.
Table 2. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard
Statewide Number of Students Tested and Number Not Tested,
Grade 9
Category
Not Tested
N Absent/
Other
2
Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04
Membership1 N Tested2 %
Tested
%
Proficient
All Students 97,211 92,214 94.9 86.1 4,997 5.1
Female 48,666 46,440 95.4 88.0 2,226 4.6
Male 48,545 45,774 94.3 84.2 2,771 5.7
American Indian 1,283 1,202 93.7 79.6 81 6.3
Asian 2,041 1,886 92.4 83.4 155 7.6
Black 28,103 25,976 92.4 76.2 2,127 7.6
Hispanic 4,482 3,985 88.9 66.8 497 11.1
Multi-Racial 1,339 1,253 93.6 86.9 86 6.4
White 59,963 57,912 96.6 92.4 2,051 3.4
Title I 961 816 84.9 59.8 145 15.1
Schoolwide Title I 634 520 82.0 60.7 114 18.0
Targeted Assistance Title I 192 172 89.6 62.5 20 10.4
Not Title I 94,546 89,988 95.2 86.8 4,558 4.8
Migrant 141 130 92.2 52.5 11 7.8
Not Migrant 95,366 90,674 95.1 86.6 4,692 4.9
Free/Reduced Lunch 26,982 25,092 93.0 77.2 1,890 7.0
Not Free/Reduced Lunch 70,229 67,122 95.6 89.5 3,107 4.4
Limited English Proficient 2,132 1,853 86.9 46.2 279 13.1
Not Limited English Proficient 95,079 90,361 95.0 87.0 4,718 5.0
Students With Disabilities 11,373 9,533 83.8 55.7 1,840 16.2
Students Without Disabilities 85,838 82,681 96.3 90.1 3,157 3.7
Students With IEPs 9,982 8,164 81.8 51.3 1,818 18.2
Students Without IEPs 87,229 84,050 96.4 90.1 3,179 3.6
Behaviorally-Emotionally Disabled 753 636 84.5 44.1 117 15.5
Hearing Impaired 128 106 82.8 53.1 22 17.2
Educable Mentally Disabled 1,596 826 51.8 7.6 770 48.2
Specific Learning Disabled 5,433 5,090 93.7 65.3 343 6.3
Speech-Language Impaired 82 75 91.5 65.9 7 8.5
Visually Impaired 50 44 88.0 70.0 6 12.0
Other Health Impaired 1,397 1,230 88.0 61.8 167 12.0
Orthopedically Impaired 57 48 84.2 54.4 9 15.8
Traumatic Brain Injury 30 20 66.7 46.7 10 33.3
Autistic 139 62 44.6 31.7 77 55.4
Severely/Profoundly Mentally Disabled 38 2 5.3 * 36 94.7
Multihandicapped 70 8 11.4 * 62 88.6
Deaf-Blind 10 5 50.0 30.0 5 50.0
Trainable Mentally Disabled 199 12 6.0 * 187 94.0
Section 504 1,391 1,369 98.4 87.5 22 1.6
Notes: 1"Membership" is the total number of students on the 2003-04 Masterbuild data file.
*Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent,
or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed.
These data represent coding on the 2003-04 test documents.
2"N Tested" represents the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated.
Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program.
Table 3. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard
Statewide Number of Students Tested and Number Not Tested,
Grade 10
Category
Not Tested
N Absent/
Other
% Absent/
Other
3
Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04
Membership1 N Tested2 %
Tested
%
Proficient
All Students 83,535 80,008 95.8 91.4 3,527 4.2
Female 42,474 40,867 96.2 92.7 1,607 3.8
Male 41,061 39,141 95.3 90.0 1,920 4.7
American Indian 1,017 976 96.0 89.8 41 4.0
Asian 1,786 1,677 93.9 87.0 109 6.1
Black 22,928 21,543 94.0 85.4 1,385 6.0
Hispanic 3,331 3,059 91.8 79.1 272 8.2
Multi-Racial 1,105 1,025 92.8 89.1 80 7.2
White 53,368 51,728 96.9 94.9 1,640 3.1
Title I 573 522 91.1 73.3 51 8.9
Schoolwide Title I 395 357 90.4 76.2 38 9.6
Targeted Assistance Title I 92 82 89.1 64.1 10 10.9
Not Title I 66,474 64,876 97.6 93.9 1,598 2.4
Migrant 90 86 95.6 70.0 4 4.4
Not Migrant 66,957 65,312 97.5 93.7 1,645 2.5
Free/Reduced Lunch**
Not Free/Reduced Lunch**
Limited English Proficient 244 215 88.1 56.6 29 11.9
Not Limited English Proficient 83,291 79,793 95.8 91.5 3,498 4.2
Students With Disabilities 6,313 5,899 93.4 76.9 414 6.6
Students Without Disabilities 77,222 74,109 96.0 92.6 3,113 4.0
Students With IEPs 5,460 5,065 92.8 74.5 395 7.2
Students Without IEPs 78,075 74,943 96.0 92.5 3,132 4.0
Behaviorally-Emotionally Disabled 326 293 89.9 64.7 33 10.1
Hearing Impaired 74 72 97.3 82.4 2 2.7
Educable Mentally Disabled 498 380 76.3 35.5 118 23.7
Specific Learning Disabled 3,384 3,293 97.3 81.1 91 2.7
Speech-Language Impaired 34 30 88.2 73.5 4 11.8
Visually Impaired 28 27 96.4 92.9 1 3.6
Other Health Impaired 873 818 93.7 81.2 55 6.3
Orthopedically Impaired 39 32 82.1 74.4 7 17.9
Traumatic Brain Injury 22 19 86.4 68.2 3 13.6
Autistic 79 57 72.2 55.7 22 27.8
Severely/Profoundly Mentally Disabled 13 2 15.4 * 11 84.6
Multihandicapped 13 6 46.2 23.1 7 53.8
Deaf-Blind 18 18 100.0 72.2 0 0.0
Trainable Mentally Disabled 59 18 30.5 13.6 41 69.5
Section 504 853 834 97.8 92.0 19 2.2
Notes: 1"Membership" is the total number of students on the 2003-04 Masterbuild data file.
*Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent,
or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed.
**Free/ Reduced Lunch information is not collected for grades 9 and 11.
These data represent coding on the 2003-04 test documents.
2"N Tested" represents the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated.
Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program.
Table 4. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard
Statewide Number of Students Tested and Number Not Tested,
Grade 11
Category
Not Tested
N Absent/
Other
% Absent/
Other
4
Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04
Membership1 N Tested2 %
Tested
%
Proficient
All Students 76,846 74,170 96.5 94.1 2,676 3.5
Female 39,188 38,065 97.1 >=95% 1,123 2.9
Male 37,658 36,105 95.9 93.0 1,553 4.1
American Indian 958 921 96.1 93.1 37 3.9
Asian 1,722 1,662 96.5 93.1 60 3.5
Black 20,929 19,828 94.7 89.7 1,101 5.3
Hispanic 2,614 2,468 94.4 88.6 146 5.6
Multi-Racial 811 781 96.3 94.5 30 3.7
White 49,812 48,510 97.4 >=95% 1,302 2.6
Title I 552 466 84.4 75.5 86 15.6
Schoolwide Title I 442 369 83.5 75.1 73 16.5
Targeted Assistance Title I 46 39 84.8 76.1 7 15.2
Not Title I 72,153 69,772 96.7 94.5 2,381 3.3
Migrant 66 60 90.9 78.8 6 9.1
Not Migrant 72,639 70,178 96.6 94.3 2,461 3.4
Free/Reduced Lunch 16,256 15,455 95.1 90.0 801 4.9
Not Free/Reduced Lunch 60,590 58,715 96.9 >=95% 1,875 3.1
Limited English Proficient 1,188 1,141 96.0 80.4 47 4.0
Not Limited English Proficient 75,658 73,029 96.5 94.4 2,629 3.5
Students With Disabilities 6,784 5,671 83.6 69.3 1,113 16.4
Students Without Disabilities 70,062 68,499 97.8 >=95% 1,563 2.2
Students With IEPs 6,328 5,219 82.5 67.3 1,109 17.5
Students Without IEPs 70,518 68,951 97.8 >=95% 1,567 2.2
Behaviorally-Emotionally Disabled 232 212 91.4 71.6 20 8.6
Hearing Impaired 86 82 95.3 86.0 4 4.7
Educable Mentally Disabled 1,026 597 58.2 21.7 429 41.8
Specific Learning Disabled 3,505 3,389 96.7 85.1 116 3.3
Speech-Language Impaired 41 39 95.1 78.0 2 4.9
Visually Impaired 35 31 88.6 85.7 4 11.4
Other Health Impaired 708 668 94.4 84.0 40 5.6
Orthopedically Impaired 53 43 81.1 71.7 10 18.9
Traumatic Brain Injury 53 38 71.7 69.8 15 28.3
Autistic 153 62 40.5 29.4 91 59.5
Severely/Profoundly Mentally Disabled 56 8 14.3 14.3 48 85.7
Multihandicapped 119 11 9.2 * 108 90.8
Deaf-Blind 21 19 90.5 76.2 2 9.5
Trainable Mentally Disabled 240 20 8.3 <=5% 220 91.7
Section 504 456 452 99.1 >=95% 4 0.9
Notes: 1"Membership" is the total number of students on the 2003-04 Masterbuild data file.
*Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent,
or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed.
These data represent coding on the 2003-04 test documents.
2"N Tested" represents the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated.
Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program.
Table 5. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard
Statewide Number of Students Tested and Number Not Tested,
Grade 12
Category
Not Tested
N Absent/
Other
% Absent/
Other
5
Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 6
1999-00 Class of 2004 Class of 2003 Class of 2002 Class of 2001 Class of 2000
N Passing = 67,896 N Passing = 76,760 N Passing =70,072 N Passing =62,505 N Passing =59,057
Membership*= 95,354 Membership*=101,423 Membership*=81,196 Membership*=69,299 Membership*=63,406
2000-01 Class of 2005 Class of 2004 Class of 2003 Class of 2002 Class of 2001
N Passing = 74,533 N Passing = 78,865 N Passing =74,885 N Passing =65,348 N Passing =60,732
Membership*= 97,898 Membership*=102,252 Membership*=85,592 Membership*=71,603 Membership*=64,516
2001-02 Class of 2006 Class of 2005 Class of 2004 Class of 2003 Class of 2002
N Passing = 74,118 N Passing = 87,787 N Passing =79,914 N Passing =71,818 N Passing =66,679
Membership*=102,735 Membership*=112,212 Membership*=92,628 Membership*=79,057 Membership*=71,077
2002-03 Class of 2007 Class of 2006 Class of 2005 Class of 2004 Class of 2003
N Passing = 81,682 N Passing = 87,384 N Passing =81,564 N Passing =72,848 N Passing =70,768
Membership*=106,197 Membership*=113,969 Membership*=93,055 Membership*=79,898 Membership*=74,833
2003-04 Class of 2008 Class of 2007 Class of 2006 Class of 2005 Class of 2004
N Passing = 85,116 N Passing = 93,197 N Passing =83,686 N Passing =76,325 N Passing =72,349
Membership*=109,466 Membership*=119,403 Membership*=97,211 Membership*=83,535 Membership*=76,846
Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s).
*Membership equals the total number of records on the NCDPI Masterbuild file.
Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report.
Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program.
Figure 1. 1999-00 to 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard,
Percent Passing1 by Class
71.2
75.7
86.3
90.2 93.1
76.1 77.1
87.5
91.3 94.1
72.1
78.2
86.3
90.8 93.8
76.9 76.7
87.7 91.2 94.6
77.8 78.1
86.1
91.4 94.1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
8th Grade 9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade 12th Grade
Percent Passing
1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04
Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 7
Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8
EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s).
Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report.
Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program.
Figure 2. 1999-00 to 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard,
Percent Passing1 at the End of Grades 8-12
76.9
71.2 76.1 72.1
77.8
76.7
75.7
77.1 78.2 78.1
86.3 87.5 86.3 87.7 86.1
90.2 91.3 90.8 91.2 91.4
93.1 94.1 93.8 94.6 94.1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04
Percent Passing
Grade 9
Grade 12
Grade 11
Grade 10
Grade 8
8
Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s),
competency tests(s), or competency screen(s).
21996-97 data reflect changes received from LEAs after publication of the 1996-97 Competency Report.
31997-98 was the first year that 12th grade was tested.
Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report.
Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program.
Figure 3. 1996-97 to 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard,
Percent Passing1 for the Classes of 1999-2008
Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04
84.3
90.2
89.0
92.8
90.2
93.1
91.3
94.1
90.8
93.8
94.6
77.8
78.1
86.1
91.4
94.1
73.3
61.9
84.8
73.6
68.4
84.3
74.6
68.6
86.3
71.2
75.7
87.5
77.1
76.1
86.3
78.2
72.1
91.2
87.7
76.7
76.9
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999
Percent Passing
1996-97² 1997-98³ 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04
Grade:
Class of:
8 8 9 8 9 10 8 9 10 11 8 9 101112 8 9 10 11 12 8 9 101112 8 9 101112 9 1011 12 10 11 12
9
Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s),
competency test(s), or competency screens(s).
Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report.
Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program.
Figure 4. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard
Percent Passing1 by Ethnicity for the Classes of 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008,
at the End of the 2003-04 School Year
Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04
77.8 78.1
86.1
91.4
94.1
71.7
69.1
79.6
89.8
93.1
83.8
79.8
83.4
87.0
93.1
63.0 65.2
76.2
85.4
89.7
59.0
52.9
66.8
79.1
88.6
81.5 81.7
86.9 89.1
94.5
86.9 87.6
92.4
94.9
>=95
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
2008 2007 2006 2005 2004
Percent Passing
All Students American Indian Asian Black Hispanic Multi-Racial White
Class of:
Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04
10
Figure 5. 1999-00 to 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard
Percent Passing1 by Ethnicity for the Classes of 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008
at End of Grade 8
1999-00 N Passing = 67,896 N Passing = 853 N Passing =1,305 N Passing =14,224 N Passing =1,437 N Passing = 551 N Passing =49,526
Class of 2004 Membership* = 95,354 Membership* =1,403 Membership* =1,735 Membership* =27,689 Membership* =3,056 Membership* = 761 Membership* =60,710
2000-01 N Passing = 74,533 N Passing =1,000 N Passing =1,341 N Passing =16,980 N Passing =1,991 N Passing = 806 N Passing =52,415
Class of 2005 Membership* = 97,898 Membership* =1,512 Membership* =1,740 Membership* =28,820 Membership* =3,897 Membership* = 991 Membership* =60,938
2001-02 N Passing = 74,118 N Passing = 849 N Passing =1,485 N Passing =16,424 N Passing =2,149 N Passing = 949 N Passing =52,239
Class of 2006 Membership* =102,735 Membership* =1,411 Membership* =1,919 Membership* =30,491 Membership* =4,531 Membership* =1,259 Membership* =63,072
2002-03 N Passing = 81,682 N Passing =1,006 N Passing =1,687 N Passing =19,489 N Passing =3,029 N Passing =1,242 N Passing =55,229
Class of 2007 Membership* =106,197 Membership* =1,489 Membership* =2,046 Membership* =31,809 Membership* =5,347 Membership* =1,541 Membership* =63,965
2003-04 N Passing = 85,116 N Passing =1,111 N Passing =1,775 N Passing =20,834 N Passing =3,588 N Passing =1,531 N Passing =56,277
Class of 2008 Membership* =109,466 Membership* =1,550 Membership* =2,118 Membership* =33,075 Membership* =6,080 Membership* =1,879 Membership* =64,764
Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s),
competency tests(s), or competency screen(s).
*Membership equals the total number of records on the NCDPI Masterbuild file.
Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report.
Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program.
71.2
60.8
51.4
47.0
76.1
66.1
77.1
58.9
51.1
81.3
86.0
72.1
60.2
77.4
53.9
75.4
82.8
61.3
80.6
86.3
81.6
75.2 72.4
47.4
56.6
82.5
67.6
76.9
86.9
81.5
63.0 59.0
83.8
71.7
77.8
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
All Students American Indian Asian Black Hispanic Multi-Racial White
Percent Passing
1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04
11
1999-00 N Passing = 76,760 N Passing = 906 N Passing =1,400 N Passing =18,440 N Passing =1,600 N Passing = 563 N Passing =53,849
Class of 2003 Membership* =101,423 Membership* =1,496 Membership* =1,934 Membership* =30,830 Membership* =3,174 Membership* = 741 Membership* =63,241
2000-01 N Passing = 78,865 N Passing =1,046 N Passing =1,490 N Passing =18,964 N Passing =1,948 N Passing = 693 N Passing =54,724
Class of 2004 Membership* =102,252 Membership* =1,561 Membership* =1,967 Membership* =30,597 Membership* =3,911 Membership* = 895 Membership* =63,314
2001-02 N Passing = 87,787 N Passing =1,236 N Passing =1,582 N Passing =22,750 N Passing =2,630 N Passing = 999 N Passing =58,554
Class of 2005 Membership* =112,212 Membership* =1,886 Membership* =2,061 Membership* =34,696 Membership* =5,096 Membership* =1,275 Membership* =67,144
2002-03 N Passing = 87,384 N Passing =1,138 N Passing =1,651 N Passing =22,378 N Passing =2,888 N Passing =1,122 N Passing =58,207
Class of 2006 Membership* =113,969 Membership* =1,766 Membership* =2,198 Membership* =35,121 Membership* =5,932 Membership* =1,441 Membership* =67,511
2003-04 N Passing = 93,197 N Passing =1,255 N Passing =1,854 N Passing =24,260 N Passing =3,731 N Passing =1,495 N Passing =60,602
Class of 2007 Membership* =119,403 Membership* =1,816 Membership* =2,324 Membership* =37,228 Membership* =7,053 Membership* =1,829 Membership* =69,153
Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s),
competency test(s), or competency screen(s).
*Membership equals the total number of records on the NCDPI Masterbuild file.
Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report.
Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program.
Figure 6. 1999-00 to 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard
Percent Passing1 by Ethnicity for the Classes of 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007
at End of Grade 9
Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04
75.7
60.6
72.4
59.8
50.4
76.0
85.1
77.1
67.0
75.7
62.0
49.8
77.4
86.4
78.2
65.5
76.8
65.6
51.6
78.4
87.2
76.7
64.4
75.1
63.7
48.7
77.9
86.2
78.1
69.1
79.8
65.2
52.9
81.7
87.6
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
All Students American Indian Asian Black Hispanic Multi-Racial White
Percent Passing
1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04
Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04 12
1999-00 N Passing = 70,072 N Passing = 852 N Passing =1,381 N Passing =17,081 N Passing =1,317 N Passing = 474 N Passing =48,965
Class of 2002 Membership* = 81,196 Membership* =1,124 Membership* =1,696 Membership* =22,730 Membership* =1,853 Membership* = 553 Membership* =53,235
2000-01 N Passing =74,885 N Passing = 871 N Passing =1,459 N Passing =18,706 N Passing =1,664 N Passing = 621 N Passing =51,564
Class of 2003 Membership* =85,592 Membership* =1,068 Membership* =1,778 Membership* =24,137 Membership* =2,396 Membership* = 691 Membership* =55,521
2001-02 N Passing =79,914 N Passing =1,007 N Passing =1,633 N Passing =19,952 N Passing =2,100 N Passing = 726 N Passing =54,477
Class of 2004 Membership* =92,628 Membership* =1,228 Membership* =1,973 Membership* =26,363 Membership* =3,171 Membership* = 837 Membership* =59,025
2002-03 N Passing =81,564 N Passing =1,050 N Passing =1,610 N Passing =20,986 N Passing =2,620 N Passing = 991 N Passing =54,307
Class of 2005 Membership* =93,055 Membership* =1,265 Membership* =1,919 Membership* =26,528 Membership* =3,826 Membership* =1,143 Membership* =58,374
2003-04 N Passing =83,686 N Passing =1,021 N Passing =1,702 N Passing =21,424 N Passing =2,994 N Passing =1,163 N Passing =55,382
Class of 2006 Membership* =97,211 Membership* =1,283 Membership* =2,041 Membership* =28,103 Membership* =4,482 Membership* =1,339 Membership* =59,963
Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s),
competency test(s), or competency screen(s).
*Membership equals the total number of records on the NCDPI Masterbuild file.
Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report.
Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program.
Figure 7. 1999-00 to 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard
Percent Passing1 by Ethnicity for the Classes of 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006
at End of Grade 10
86.3
75.8
81.4
75.1
71.1
85.7
92.0
87.5
81.6 82.1
77.5
69.4
89.9 92.9
86.3
82.0 82.8
75.7
66.2
86.7
92.3
87.7
83.0 83.9
79.1
68.5
86.7
93.0
86.1
79.6
83.4
76.2
66.8
86.9
92.4
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
All Students American Indian Asian Black Hispanic Multi-Racial White
Percent Passing
1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04
13
1999-00 N Passing =62,505 N Passing = 676 N Passing =1,209 N Passing =15,553 N Passing =1,119 N Passing = 316 N Passing =43,632
Class of 2002 Membership* = 69,299 Membership* = 822 Membership* =1,438 Membership* =18,841 Membership* =1,389 Membership* = 365 Membership* =46,444
2000-01 N Passing =65,348 N Passing = 721 N Passing =1,346 N Passing =15,964 N Passing =1,336 N Passing = 479 N Passing =45,502
Class of 2003 Membership* =71,603 Membership* = 830 Membership* =1,551 Membership* =18,969 Membership* =1,669 Membership* = 538 Membership* =48,046
2001-02 N Passing =71,818 N Passing = 766 N Passing =1,414 N Passing =17,748 N Passing =1,759 N Passing = 605 N Passing =49,485
Class of 2004 Membership* =79,057 Membership* = 861 Membership* =1,639 Membership* =21,178 Membership* =2,235 Membership* = 690 Membership* =52,397
2002-03 N Passing =72,848 N Passing = 899 N Passing =1,538 N Passing =17,967 N Passing =2,044 N Passing = 742 N Passing =49,658
Class of 2005 Membership* =79,898 Membership* =1,000 Membership* =1,752 Membership* =21,330 Membership* =2,640 Membership* = 817 Membership* =52,359
2003-04 N Passing =76,325 N Passing = 913 N Passing =1,553 N Passing =19,570 N Passing =2,634 N Passing = 985 N Passing =50,670
Class of 2006 Membership* =83,535 Membership* =1,017 Membership* =1,786 Membership* =22,928 Membership* =3,331 Membership* =1,105 Membership* =53,368
Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s),
competency test(s), or competency screen(s).
*Membership equals the total number of records on the NCDPI Masterbuild file.
Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report.
Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program.
Figure 8. 1999-00 to 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard
Percent Passing1 by Ethnicity for the Classes of 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006
at End of Grade 11
Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04
90.2
82.2 84.1 82.5 80.6
86.6
91.3 93.9
86.9 86.8 84.2
80.0
89.0
94.7
90.8 89.0 86.3 83.8
78.7
87.7
94.4
91.2 89.9 87.8
84.2
77.4
90.8
94.8
91.4 89.8 87.0 85.4
79.1
89.1
94.9
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
All Students American Indian Asian Black Hispanic Multi-Racial White
Percent Passing
1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04
14
1999-00 N Passing =59,057 N Passing =664 N Passing =1,246 N Passing =15,173 N Passing =1,013 N Passing =315 N Passing = **
Class of 2000 Membership* =63,406 Membership* =771 Membership* =1,389 Membership* =17,191 Membership* =1,167 Membership* =342 Membership* =42,541
2000-01 N Passing =60,732 N Passing =712 N Passing =1,287 N Passing =15,741 N Passing =1,179 N Passing =353 N Passing = **
Class of 2001 Membership* =64,516 Membership* =779 Membership* =1,391 Membership* =17,570 Membership* =1,314 Membership* =378 Membership* =43,084
2001-02 N Passing =66,679 N Passing =766 N Passing =1, 416 N Passing =16,891 N Passing =1,519 N Passing =500 N Passing = **
Class of 2002 Membership* =71,077 Membership* =830 Membership* =1,554 Membership* =18,957 Membership* =1,709 Membership* =537 Membership* =47,442
2002-03 N Passing =70,768 N Passing =767 N Passing =1,472 N Passing =18,197 N Passing =1,953 N Passing =646 N Passing = **
Class of 2003 Membership* =74,833 Membership* =811 Membership* =1,596 Membership* =20,117 Membership* =2,173 Membership* =681 Membership* =49,455
2003-04 N Passing =72,349 N Passing =892 N Passing =1,604 N Passing =18,766 N Passing =2,315 N Passing =766 N Passing = **
Class of 2004 Membership* =76,846 Membership* =958 Membership* =1,722 Membership* =20,929 Membership* =2,614 Membership* =811 Membership* =49,812
Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s),
competency test(s), or competency screen(s).
*Membership equals the total number of records on the NCDPI Masterbuild file.
**Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed.
Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report.
Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program.
Figure 9. 1999-00 to 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard
Percent Passing1 by Ethnicity for the Classes of 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004
at End of Grade 12
Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04
93.1
86.1
89.7 88.3 86.8
94.1 91.4 92.5 89.6 89.7 92.1
93.8 92.3 91.1 93.4 89.1 88.9
94.6 94.6 92.2 90.5 93.1 89.9
94.1 93.1 93.1 94.9
89.7 88.6
94.5 >=95 >=95 >=95>=95 >=95
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
All Students American Indian Asian Black Hispanic Multi-Racial White
Percent Passing
1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04
Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04
Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 12
Category
Member-ship
Number
Passing
Percent
Proficient
Member-ship
Number
Passing
Percent
Proficient
Member-ship
Number
Passing
Percent
Proficient
Member-ship
Number
Passing
Percent
Proficient
Member-ship
Number
Passing
Percent
Proficient
All Students 109,466 85,116 77.8 119,403 93,197 78.1 97,211 83,686 86.1 83,535 76,325 91.4 76,846 72,349 94.1
Academically/Intellectually Gifted
AIG Reading 14,856 * >=95 15,976 * >=95 15,538 * >=95 14,262 * >=95 10,369 * >=95
AIG Mathematics 14,283 * >=95 15,734 * >=95 15,720 * >=95 14,224 * >=95 10,369 * >=95
All Students with Disabilities2 16,982 7,030 41.4 13,291 7,196 54.1 11,373 6,337 55.7 6,313 4,853 76.9 6,784 4,704 69.3
Behaviorally-Emotionally Disabled 1,382 378 27.4 1,254 450 35.9 753 332 44.1 326 211 64.7 232 166 71.6
Hearing Impaired 122 58 47.5 111 65 58.6 128 68 53.1 74 61 82.4 86 74 86.0
Educable Mentally Disabled 2,657 * <=5 1,048 135 12.9 1,596 121 7.6 498 177 35.5 1,026 223 21.7
Specific Learning Disabled 7,297 3,711 50.9 6,886 3,911 56.8 5,433 3,549 65.3 3,384 2,746 81.1 3,505 2,982 85.1
Learning Disabled-Reading 5,385 2,558 47.5 7,793 4,037 51.8 5,993 3,812 63.6 4,639 3,564 76.8 3,799 3,278 86.3
Learning Disabled-Mathematics 2,971 1,149 38.7 4,766 2,116 44.4 4,093 2,421 59.1 3,274 2,454 75.0 2,743 2,345 85.5
Learning Disabled-Written Expression 5,742 3,060 53.3 8,273 4,555 55.1 6,519 4,340 66.6 5,157 4,075 79.0 4,196 3,694 88.0
Learning Disabled-Other 189 95 50.3 467 282 60.4 620 419 67.6 530 436 82.3 475 417 87.8
Speech-Language Impaired 195 109 55.9 115 62 53.9 82 54 65.9 34 25 73.5 41 32 78.0
Visually Impaired 56 35 62.5 62 43 69.4 50 35 70.0 28 26 92.9 35 30 85.7
Other Health Impaired 2,368 1,059 44.7 1,914 1,088 56.8 1,397 863 61.8 873 709 81.2 708 595 84.0
Orthopedically Impaired 62 28 45.2 40 25 62.5 57 31 54.4 39 29 74.4 53 38 71.7
Traumatic Brain Injured 67 23 34.3 40 16 40.0 30 14 46.7 22 15 68.2 53 37 69.8
Autistic 316 72 22.8 118 64 54.2 139 44 31.7 79 44 55.7 153 45 29.4
Severely/Profoundly Mentally Disabled 62 * <=5 13 * * 38 * <=5 13 1 7.7 56 8 14.3
Multihandicapped 124 * <=5 17 2 11.8 70 * <=5 13 3 23.1 119 * <=5
Deaf/Blind 19 9 47.4 101 45 44.6 10 3 30.0 18 13 72.2 21 16 76.2
Trainable Mentally Disabled 269 * <=5 31 5 16.1 199 * <=5 59 8 13.6 240 * <=5
Section 504 1,986 1,456 73.3 1,541 1,285 83.4 1,391 1,217 87.5 853 785 92.0 456 * >=95
Not Coded 1,842 1,312 71.2 1,439 1,184 82.3 1,274 1,100 86.3 781 714 91.4 368 * >=95
Limited English Proficient 3,265 1,224 37.5 2,406 1,638 68.1 2,132 985 46.2 244 138 56.6 1,188 955 80.4
Not Served by Title I 88,046 70,302 79.8 109,098 89,947 82.4 94,546 82,086 86.8 66,474 62,399 93.9 72,153 68,154 94.5
Schoolwide Title I Program 20,102 14,100 70.1 879 485 55.2 634 385 60.7 395 301 76.2 442 332 75.1
Targeted Assistance 1,049 595 56.7 353 151 42.8 192 120 62.5 92 59 64.1 46 35 76.1
Migrant 688 417 60.6 210 93 44.3 141 74 52.5 90 63 70.0 66 52 78.8
Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s).
2"All Students with Disabilities" includes "Section 504" but not those in the "Not Coded" category.
*Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed.
All variables were merged from external data sources with the Masterbuild file. Due to the challenges of merging multiple files, inconsistencies in data quality may increase from grade 8 to grade 12.
Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report.
Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program.
Across Grades 8 - 12
Table 6. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard
Percent Passing the Competency Standard1
Performance of Exceptional, Limited English Proficient, and Title I Students,
15
Grade 8 N Passing = 85,116 N Passing = 7,030
Membership = 109,466 Membership = 16,982
Grade 9 N Passing = 93,197 N Passing = 7,196
Membership = 119,403 Membership = 13,291
Grade 10 N Passing = 83,686 N Passing = 6,337
Membership = 97,211 Membership = 11,373
Grade 11 N Passing = 76,325 N Passing = 4,853
Membership = 83,535 Membership = 6,313
Grade 12 N Passing = 72,349 N Passing = 4,704
Membership = 76,846 Membership = 6,784
Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG
test(s), competency tests(s), or competency screen(s).
Due to challenges of merging multiple files, inconsistencies in data quality may increase from grade 8 to grade 12.
Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report.
Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program.
Grades 8-12
Report of Student Performance in the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04
Figure 10. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard
Percent Passing the Competency Standard,1
Performance of Students with Disabilities,
77.8
41.4
78.1
54.1
86.1
55.7
91.4
76.9
94.1
69.3
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
State All Students with Disabilities
Percent Passing
Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 12
16
Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04
BED- Behaviorally-Emotionally Disabled HI- Hearing Impaired EMD-Educable Mentally Disabled SLD- Specific Learning Disabled
SLI- Speech-Language Impaired VI- Visually Impaired OHI-Other Health Impaired OI-Orthopedically Impaired
Grade 8 N Passing = 85,116 N Passing = 7,030 N Passing = 378 N Passing = 58 N Passing = * N Passing = 3,711 N Passing = 109 N Passing = 35 N Passing = 1,059 N Passing = 28
Membership =109,466 Membership = 16,982 Membership = 1,382 Membership = 122 Membership = 2,657 Membership = 7,297 Membership = 195 Membership = 56 Membership = 2,368 Membership = 62
Grade 9 N Passing = 93,197 N Passing = 7,196 N Passing = 450 N Passing = 65 N Passing = 135 N Passing = 3,911 N Passing = 62 N Passing = 43 N Passing = 1,088 N Passing = 25
Membership =119,403 Membership = 13,291 Membership = 1,254 Membership = 111 Membership = 1,048 Membership = 6,886 Membership = 115 Membership = 62 Membership = 1,914 Membership = 40
Grade 10 N Passing = 83,686 N Passing = 6,337 N Passing = 332 N Passing = 68 N Passing = 121 N Passing = 3,549 N Passing = 54 N Passing = 35 N Passing = 863 N Passing = 31
Membership = 97,211 Membership = 11,373 Membership = 753 Membership = 128 Membership = 1,596 Membership = 5,433 Membership = 82 Membership = 50 Membership = 1,397 Membership = 57
Grade 11 N Passing = 76,325 N Passing = 4,853 N Passing = 211 N Passing = 61 N Passing = 177 N Passing = 2,746 N Passing = 25 N Passing = 26 N Passing = 709 N Passing = 29
Membership = 83,535 Membership = 6,313 Membership = 326 Membership = 74 Membership = 498 Membership = 3,384 Membership = 34 Membership = 28 Membership = 873 Membership = 39
Grade 12 N Passing = 72,349 N Passing = 4,704 N Passing = 166 N Passing = 74 N Passing = 223 N Passing = 2,982 N Passing = 32 N Passing = 30 N Passing = 595 N Passing = 38
Membership = 76,846 Membership = 6,784 Membership = 232 Membership = 86 Membership = 1,026 Membership = 3,505 Membership = 41 Membership = 35 Membership = 708 Membership = 53
Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s).
Due to challenges of merging multiple files, inconsistencies in data quality may increase from grade 8 to grade 12.
*Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed.
Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report.
Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program.
17
Figure 11. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard
Percent Passing the Competency Standard,1
Performance of Students with Disabilities by Classification,
Grades 8-12
77.8
12.9
53.1
7.6
70.0
54.4
82.4
92.9
81.2
74.4
69.3
71.6
86.0
21.7
85.1
78.0
85.7
84.0
71.7
<=5
50.9
55.9
27.4
41.4
62.5
45.2
44.7
47.5
56.8
53.9
35.9
54.1
78.1
69.4
62.5
56.8
58.6
65.3
65.9
44.1
55.7
86.1
61.8
35.5
81.1
73.5
64.7
76.9
91.4
94.1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
State All Students with
Disabilities
BED HI EMD SLD SLI VI OHI OI
Percent Passing
Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 12
Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04
TBI-Traumatic Brain Injured A - Autistic D/B - Deaf/Blind SPMD - Severely/Profoundly Mentally Disabled
MH-Multihandicapped TMD - Trainable Mentally Disabled 504 - Section 504
Grade 8 N Passing = 85,116 N Passing = 7,030 N Passing = 23 N Passing = 72 N Passing = 9 N Passing = * N Passing = * N Passing = * N Passing = 1,456
Membership = 109,466 Membership = 16,982 Membership = 67 Membership = 316 Membership = 19 Membership = 62 Membership = 124 Membership = 269 Membership = 1,986
Grade 9 N Passing = 93,197 N Passing = 7,196 N Passing = 16 N Passing = 64 N Passing = 45 N Passing = * N Passing = 2 N Passing = 5 N Passing = 1,285
Membership = 119,403 Membership = 13,291 Membership = 40 Membership = 118 Membership = 101 Membership = 13 Membership = 17 Membership = 31 Membership = 1,541
Grade 10 N Passing = 83,686 N Passing = 6,337 N Passing = 14 N Passing = 44 N Passing = 3 N Passing = * N Passing = * N Passing = * N Passing = 1,217
Membership = 97,211 Membership = 11,373 Membership = 30 Membership = 139 Membership = 10 Membership = 38 Membership = 70 Membership = 199 Membership = 1,391
Grade 11 N Passing = 76,325 N Passing = 4,853 N Passing = 15 N Passing = 44 N Passing = 13 N Passing = 1 N Passing = 3 N Passing = 8 N Passing = 785
Membership = 83,535 Membership = 6,313 Membership = 22 Membership = 79 Membership = 18 Membership = 13 Membership = 13 Membership = 59 Membership = 853
Grade 12 N Passing = 72,349 N Passing = 4,704 N Passing = 37 N Passing = 45 N Passing = 16 N Passing = 8 N Passing = * N Passing = * N Passing = *
Membership = 76,846 Membership = 6,784 Membership = 53 Membership = 153 Membership = 21 Membership = 56 Membership = 119 Membership = 240 Membership = 456
Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency sc
Due to challenges of merging multiple files, inconsistencies in data quality may increase from grade 8 to grade 12.
*Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed.
Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report.
Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Testing Program
18
Figure 11. 2003-04 North Carolina Competency Tests
Percent Passing the Competency Standard,1
Performance of Students with Disabilities by Classification,
Grades 8-12 (continued) 77.8
47.4
44.6
31.7
30.0
55.7
13.6
92.0
69.3
69.8
29.4
76.2
<=5
<=5
34.3
41.4
<=5
73.3
22.8
<=5
11.8
40.0
54.1
78.1
16.1
83.4
54.2
<=5
<=5
46.7
55.7
86.1
87.5
<=5
72.2
7.7
23.1
68.2
76.9
91.4
94.1
14.3
84.0
<=5
<=5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
State All Students with
Disabilities
TBI A D/B SPMD MH TMD 504
Percent Passing
Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 12
Grade 8 N Passing = 85,116 N Passing =1,224
Membership=109,466 Membership=3,265
Grade 9 N Passing = 93,197 N Passing =1,638
Membership=119,403 Membership=2,406
Grade 10 N Passing = 83,686 N Passing = 985
Membership= 97,211 Membership=2,132
Grade 11 N Passing = 76,325 N Passing = 138
Membership= 83,535 Membership= 244
Grade 12 N Passing = 72,349 N Passing = 955
Membership= 76,846 Membership=1,188
Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s),
competency test(s), or competency screen(s)
Due to challenges of merging multiple files, inconsistencies in data quality may increase from grade 8 to grade 12
Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report
Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program
Grades 8-12
Report of Student Performance in the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04
Figure 12. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard
Percent Passing the Competency Standard,1
Performance of Limited English Proficient Students,
77.8
37.5
78.1
68.1
86.1
46.2
91.4
56.6
94.1
80.4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
State Limited English Proficient
Percent Passing
Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 12
19
Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated.
Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s).
Due to rounding, percents may not sum to 100.0 percent. All LEAs are included in this figure.
Data received from LEAs after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report.
Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program.
Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04
at End of Grade 8
Figure 13. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard
Percent of LEAs and Charter Schools in Each Percent Passing1 Category,
for the Class of 2008,
9.5%
43.8%
27.8%
11.2%
5.3% 2.4%
Below 50% 50-59%
60-69% 70-79%
80-89% 90% (or above)
Percent Passing Categories:
20
Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated.
Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s).
Due to rounding, percents may not sum to 100.0 percent. All LEAs are included in this figure.
Data received from LEAs after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report.
Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program.
Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04
at End of Grade 9
Figure 14. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard
Percent of LEAs and Charter Schools in Each Percent Passing1 Category,
for the Class of 2007,
24.1%
41.8%
9.9%
3.6%
6.4%
14.2%
Below 50% 50-59%
60-69% 70-79%
80-89% 90% (or above)
Percent Passing Categories:
21
Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated.
Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s).
Due to rounding, percents may not sum to 100.0 percent. All LEAs are included in this figure.
Data received from LEAs after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report.
Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program.
Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04
at End of Grade 10
Figure 15. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard
Percent of LEAs and Charter Schools in Each Percent Passing1 Category,
for the Class of 2006,
0.0%
2.2%
11.6%
3.6%
42.8%
39.9%
Below 50% 50-59%
60-69% 70-79%
80-89% 90% (or above)
Percent Passing Categories:
22
Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated.
Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s).
Due to rounding, percents may not sum to 100.0 percent. All LEAs are included in this figure.
Data received from LEAs after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report.
Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program.
Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04
at End of Grade 11
Figure 16. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard
Percent of LEAs and Charter Schools in Each Percent Passing1 Category,
for the Class of 2005,
75.0%
0.8% 0.0%
3.8%
18.2%
2.3%
Below 50% 50-59%
60-69% 70-79%
80-89% 90% (or above)
Percent Passing Categories:
23
Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated.
Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s).
Due to rounding, percents may not sum to 100.0 percent. All LEAs are included in this figure.
Data received from LEAs after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report.
Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program.
Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04
at End of Grade 12
Figure 17. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard
Percent of LEAs and Charter Schools in Each Percent Passing1 Category,
for the Class of 2004,
89.2%
8.5%
0.8%
0.8% 0.0% 0.8%
Below 50% 50-59%
60-69% 70-79%
80-89% 90% (or above)
Percent Passing Categories:
24
25
Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s),
competency test(s), or competency screen(s).
All LEAs are included in this figure.
Data received from LEAs after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report.
Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program.
at the End of Grades 8-12
Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04
Figure 18. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard
Percent of LEAs and Charter Schools in Each Percent Passing1 Category,
for the Class of 2004,
End of Grade 8 End of Grade 9 End of Grade 10
End of Grade 11 End of Grade 12
Below 50%
50-59%
60-69%
70-79%
80-89%
90% (or above)
Percent Passing
Categories:
Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04
Below 50%
N=9
Carter Community** Alamance-Burlington Hickory City Alexander Hyde
Imani Institute** Alpha Academy** Lee Alleghany Iredell-Statesville
Kennedy Charter** Asheboro City Lenoir American Ren. Middle** Jackson
Lakeside School** Asheville City Madison Avery Johnston
Omuteko Gwamaziima** Bertie Martin Beaufort Kings Mountain City
Provisions Academy** Bladen Montgomery Bethany Community** Lincoln
SPARC Academy** Brunswick Mountain Community** Brevard Academy** Macon
Success Institute** Burke Nash-Rocky Mount Buncombe McDowell
Sugar Creek** Caswell Perquimans C.G. Woodson** Mitchell
Charlotte/Mecklenburg Pitt CIS Academy** Moore
Columbus Research Triangle** Cabarrus Mooresville City
Craven Richmond Caldwell New Hanover
50-59% Cumberland River Mill Academy** Camden Newton-Conover City
N=4 Duplin Roanoke Rapids City Cape Fear Center** Onslow
Ann Atwater** Edgecombe Rockingham Carteret Orange
Bridges** Elizabeth City/Pasquotank Rowan-Salisbury Catawba Orange Charter**
S.B. Howard** Forsyth Academies** Rutherford Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Pamlico
Vance Franklin Sampson Chatham Pender
Gaston Scotland Cleveland Person
Gates Swain Clinton City Piedmont Community**
Greene Wayne Clover Garden** Polk
Guilford Winston-Salem/Forsyth Currituck Quality Education**
Halifax Yadkin Dare Randolph
60-69% Harnett Davidson Stanly
N=19 Davie Stokes
Academy of Moore County** Downtown Middle** Summit Charter**
Anson East Wake Academy** Surry
Chatham Charter** Edenton/Chowan Swain
Durham Elkin City Thomas Jefferson**
Guilford Charter** F Delany New School** Transylvania
Hertford Graham Tyrrell
Hoke Grandfather Academy** Union
Jones Granville Vance Charter**
Kannapolis City Greensboro Academy** Wake
Kestrel Heights** Haliwa-Saponi Tribal** Wilkes
Lexington City Haywood Wilson
Northampton Henderson Yancey
Robeson
Shelby City
Thomasville City
Warren Arapahoe Charter** Lincoln Charter**
Washington Ashe Magellan**
Weldon City Cherokee Metrolina**
Whiteville City Clay Mount Airy City
Evergreen Community** Quest Academy**
Exploris** Sterling Montessori**
Franklin Academy** Watauga
Lake Norman** Woods Charter**
Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on
grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Data are rounded to the nearest
whole percent for inclusion in the appropriate percent passing range category.
**Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix
Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report.
Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program
90% or Above
N=16
Table 7. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard
Percent Passing* Category for the Class of 2008, at End of Grade 8, by LEA
N=47
70-79% 80-89%
N=74
26
Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04
Below 50% 90% or above
N=9 N=20
Alpha Academy** Alexander Jones Ashe
C.G. Woodson** Alleghany Kings Mountain City Carteret
Cape Lookout Marine** Asheboro City Lincoln Clover Garden**
Crossroads Charter** Avery Martin East Wake Academy**
J.H. Baker Jr High** Brunswick Moore Elkin City
Kennedy Charter** Buncombe Mooresville City Franklin Academy**
Lakeside School** Burke Nash-Rocky Mount Graham
Laurinburg Charter** Cabarrus New Hanover Gray Stone Day**
Provisions Academy** Camden Newton-Conover City Lincoln Charter**
Catawba Onslow Macon
Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Orange McDowell
Chatham Pamlico Mount Airy City
50-59% Cherokee Perquimans Pender
N=5 Clay Person Polk
Crossnore Academy** Cleveland Pitt Raleigh Charter HS**
Grandfather Academy** Clinton City Randolph River Mill Academy**
Hertford Craven Rockingham Surry
Laurinburg Homework** Currituck Rutherford Transylvania
Lexington City Dare Sampson Watauga
Davidson Stanly Woods Charter**
Davie Stokes
Edenton/Chowan Swain
Franklin Thomas Jefferson**
60-69% Granville Tyrrell
N=14 Haywood Union
Ann Atwater** Henderson Wake
Bertie Hyde Wilkes
Durham Iredell-Statesville Yadkin
Edgecombe Jackson Yancey
Elizabeth City/Pasquotank Johnston
Greene
Halifax
Hoke
Kestrel Heights**
Northampton
Robeson
Thomasville City
Vance
Whiteville City
Alamance-Burlington Lee
Anson Lenoir
Asheville City Madison
Beaufort Mitchell
Bladen Montgomery
Caldwell Richmond
Caswell Roanoke Rapids City
Charlotte/Mecklenburg Rocky Mount Prep Sch**
Columbus Rowan-Salisbury
Cumberland Scotland
Duplin Shelby City
Gaston Warren
Gates Washington
Guilford Wayne
Harnett Weldon City
Hickory City Wilson
Kannapolis City Winston-Salem/Forsyth
Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes
successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). Performance data are not reported when membership
is fewer than five. Data are rounded to the nearest whole percent for inclusion in the appropriate percent passing range category.
**Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found
in the Appendix.
Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report.
Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program.
Table 8. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard
Percent Passing* Category for the Class of 2007, at End of Grade 9, by LEA
70-79%
N=34
80-89%
N=59
27
Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04
Below 50%
N=5
C.G. Woodson** Alamance-Burlington Madison Alexander Kannapolis City
Crossnore Academy** Asheville City Martin Alleghany Kestrel Heights**
Crossroads Charter** Beaufort Mitchell Ashe Laurinburg Homework**
J.H. Baker Jr High** Bladen Montgomery Asheboro City Lee
Laurinburg Charter** Brunswick Moore Avery Lenoir
Burke Nash-Rocky Mount Buncombe Lincoln Charter**
Caldwell Newton-Conover City Cabarrus Macon
50-59% Caswell Orange Camden McDowell
N=0 Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Perquimans Carteret Mooresville City
None Charlotte/Mecklenburg Richmond Catawba Mount Airy City
Clay Roanoke Rapids City Chatham New Hanover
Columbus Rockingham Cherokee Onslow
Davidson Rowan-Salisbury Cleveland Pamlico
60-69% Duplin Rutherford Clinton City Pender
N=3 Durham Scotland Clover Garden** Person
Hertford Elizabeth City/Pasquotank Shelby City Craven Pitt
Lakeside School** Franklin Swain Currituck Polk
Provisions Academy** Gaston Vance Dare Raleigh Charter HS**
Greene Wake Davie Randolph
Guilford Warren East Wake Academy** River Mill Academy**
Harnett Wayne Edenton/Chowan Sampson
70-79% Henderson Weldon City Elkin City Stanly
N=16 Hoke Wilkes Franklin Academy** Stokes
Anson Iredell-Statesville Wilson Gates Surry
Bertie Jackson Winston-Salem/Forsyth Graham Thomas Jefferson**
Cape Lookout Marine** Jones Yadkin Granville Transylvania
Cumberland Kings Mountain City Yancey Gray Stone Day** Union
Edgecombe Lincoln Haywood Watauga
Halifax Hyde Woods Charter**
Hickory City Johnston
Kennedy Charter**
Lexington City
Northampton
Robeson
Rocky Mount Prep Sch**
Thomasville City
Tyrrell
Washington
Whiteville City
Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful
performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than
five. Data are rounded to the nearest whole percent for inclusion in the appropriate percent passing range category.
**Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix.
Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report.
Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program.
80-89%
N=55
Table 9. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard
Percent Passing* Category for the Class of 2006, at End of Grade 10, by LEA
90% or Above
N=59
28
Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04
Below 50%
N=3
C.G. Woodson** Alamance-Burlington Gates Pamlico
Crossroads Charter** Alexander Graham Pender
Laurinburg Charter** Ashe Granville Perquimans
Asheboro City Gray Stone Day** Person
50-59% Asheville City Halifax Pitt
N=1 Beaufort Haywood Polk
J.H. Baker Jr High** Bladen Henderson Raleigh Charter HS**
Brunswick Hickory City Randolph
Buncombe Hoke Richmond
Burke Hyde River Mill Academy**
60-69% Cabarrus Iredell-Statesville Roanoke Rapids City
N=0 Camden Jackson Rockingham
None Carteret Johnston Rutherford
Caswell Jones Sampson
Catawba Kannapolis City Scotland
Charlotte/Mecklenburg Kings Mountain City Stanly
Chatham Lee Stokes
70-79% Cherokee Lenoir Surry
N=5 Clay Lincoln Swain
Hertford Cleveland Macon Thomas Jefferson**
Kennedy Charter** Clinton City Madison Thomasville City
Laurinburg Homework** Columbus Martin Transylvania
Rocky Mount Prep Sch** Craven McDowell Tyrrell
Shelby City Currituck Mitchell Union
Dare Montgomery Vance
Davidson Moore Warren
Davie Mooresville City Watauga
Alleghany Guilford Duplin Mount Airy City Weldon City
Anson Harnett East Wake Academy** Nash-Rocky Mount Wilkes
Avery Lexington City Edenton/Chowan New Hanover Winston-Salem/Forsyth
Bertie Lincoln Charter** Elizabeth City/Pasquotank Newton-Conover City Woods Charter**
Caldwell Northampton Elkin City Onslow Yadkin
Cape Lookout Marine** Robeson Franklin Orange Yancey
Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Rowan-Salisbury
Cumberland Wake
Durham Washington
Edgecombe Wayne
Gaston Whiteville City
Greene Wilson
Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes
successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). Performance data are not reported when membership
is fewer than five. Data are rounded to the nearest whole percent for inclusion in the appropriate percent passing range category.
**Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found
in the Appendix.
Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report.
Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program.
80-89%
N=24
N=99
Table 10. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard
Percent Passing* Category for the Class of 2005, at End of Grade 11, by LEA
90% or Above
29
Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04
Below 50%
N=1
Crossnore Academy** Alamance-Burlington Gates Person
Alexander Graham Pitt
Anson Granville Polk
50-59% Ashe Greene Provisions Academy**
N=1 Asheboro City Guilford Raleigh Charter HS**
Laurinburg Charter** Asheville City Harnett Randolph
Avery Haywood Richmond
Beaufort Henderson River Mill Academy**
60-69% Bladen Hertford Roanoke Rapids City
N=0 Brunswick Hickory City Robeson
None Buncombe Hoke Rockingham
Burke Hyde Rowan-Salisbury
70-79% Cabarrus Iredell-Statesville Rutherford
N=1 Caldwell Jackson Sampson
J.H. Baker Jr High** Camden Johnston Scotland
Carteret Kannapolis City Stanly
80-89% Caswell Kings Mountain City Stokes
N=11 Catawba Lee Surry
Alleghany Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Lenoir Swain
Bertie Charlotte/Mecklenburg Lincoln Thomas Jefferson**
Cape Lookout Marine** Chatham Macon Thomasville City
Crossroads Charter** Cherokee Madison Transylvania
Durham Clay Martin Tyrrell
Edgecombe Cleveland McDowell Union
Halifax Clinton City Mitchell Vance
Jones Columbus Montgomery Wake
Laurinburg Homework** Craven Moore Warren
Lexington City Cumberland Mooresville City Washington
Shelby City Currituck Mount Airy City Watauga
Dare Nash-Rocky Mount Wayne
Davidson New Hanover Weldon City
Davie Newton-Conover City Whiteville City
Duplin Northampton Wilkes
East Wake Academy** Onslow Wilson
Edenton/Chowan Orange Winston-Salem/Forsyth
Elizabeth City/Pasquotank Pamlico Woods Charter**
Elkin City Pender Yadkin
Franklin Perquimans Yancey
Gaston
Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes
successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). Performance data are not reported when membership
is fewer than five. Data are rounded to the nearest whole percent for inclusion in the appropriate percent passing range category.
**Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can
be found in the Appendix.
Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report.
Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program.
Table 11. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard
Percent Passing* Category for the Class of 2004, at End of Grade 12, by LEA
90% or Above
N=115
30
Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04
State Percent Passing
>=..9. 5 Magellan**, Metrolina**, Quest Academy**, Sterling Montessori**
>=..9. 5 Lake Norman**
>=95 Exploris**
94.5 Woods Charter**
94....0 Arapahoe Charter**
93.0 Lincoln Charter**
92.5 Ashe, Mount Airy City
92.0 Franklin Academy**, Watauga
91.5 Clay
91.0 Cherokee
90....5 Evergreen Community**
89....0 Bethany Community**, Chapel Hill-Carrboro City, Orange Charter**, Tyrrell
88.0 Alleghany, Currituck, Davie, Downtown Middle**, Greensboro Academy**, Yancey
87.5 Summit Charter**
87....0 Polk
86.0 Cabarrus, Grandfather Academy**, Onslow, Pender
85.5 Carteret, Mooresville City, Wilkes
85.0 Caldwell, Chatham, Dare, F Delany New School**, Kings Mountain City, McDowell, Transylvania, Vance Charter**
84.5 Catawba, Davidson
84.0 Moore, Person, Thomas Jefferson**
83.5 Camden, Cleveland, Clinton City, Elkin City, Henderson, Pamlico, Quality Education**, Wake
83.0 Avery, Graham, Haywood, Iredell-Statesville, Lincoln, Mitchell, Newton-Conover City, Stokes, Surry
82.5 Hyde, Johnston, Randolph, Stanly
82.0 American Ren. Middle**, C.G. Woodson**, CIS Academy**, Piedmont Community**
81.5 Alexander
81.0 Beaufort, Buncombe, Clover Garden**, Union, Wilson
80.5 Macon, Orange
80.0 Brevard Academy**, Cape Fear Center**, East Wake Academy**, Edenton/Chowan, Granville, Haliwa-Saponi Tribal**,
Jackson, New Hanover
79....5 Swain
78.5 Burke, Perquimans, River Mill Academy**, Rockingham
2004 State 78.0 Hickory City, Rowan-Salisbury
77.5 Asheboro City
2003 State 77.0 Brunswick, Craven, Harnett, Rutherford, Wayne, Yadkin
2001 State 76.5 Alamance-Burlington
76.0 Gates, Martin, Nash-Rocky Mount, Richmond
75.5 Charlotte/Mecklenburg, Gaston, Sampson
75.0 Forsyth Academies**, Halifax, Lenoir, Roanoke Rapids City
74.5 Guilford, Lee
74.0 Scotland
73.5 Asheville City
73.0 Madison, Winston-Salem/Forsyth
72.5 Caswell, Elizabeth City/Pasquotank, Mountain Community**
2002 State 72.0
2000 State 71.5 Alpha Academy**, Bertie, Pitt, Rocky Mount Prep Sch**
71.0 Bladen, Greene, Montgomery
70.5 Duplin, Edgecombe, Franklin, Research Triangle**
70.0 Columbus, Cumberland
69.5 Hoke
1999 State 69.0
1998 State 68.5 Guilford Charter**, Kannapolis City, Robeson
68.0 Jones, Shelby City
67.5 Northampton
67.0 Academy of Moore County**, Durham
66.5 Weldon City
66....0 Warren
65....0 Thomasville City
64.0 Chatham Charter**, Lexington City
63.5 Anson
63....0 Kestrel Heights**
62....0 Whiteville City
61....0 Washington
60....0 Hertford
58....0 S.B. Howard**
53....0 Vance
50....0 Ann Atwater**, Bridges**
46....0 Sugar Creek**
44....0 Imani Institute**
40....0 Success Institute**
36....0 Provisions Academy**
29....0 Omuteko Gwamaziima**
28....0 SPARC Academy**
25....0 Kennedy Charter**
17....0 Carter Community**, Lakeside School**
*** Crossnore Academy**, Laurinburg Homework**
Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8
EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). Percent passing is rounded up to the nearest half percent.
**Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix.
***Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed.
Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report.
Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program.
Table 12. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard
Percent Passing* for the Class of 2008, at End of Grade 8, by LEA
2004 LEA Performance
31
Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04
State Percent Passing
>=..9. 5 Raleigh Charter HS**, River Mill Academy**, Woods Charter**
>=..9. 5 Franklin Academy**, Gray Stone Day**
94.0 Clover Garden**
93.5 Mount Airy City
93.0 Carteret, Elkin City, Watauga
9.2...5 Graham
91.5 Transylvania
9.1...0 Ashe, McDowell, Polk, Surry
90.0 East Wake Academy**, Lincoln Charter**, Macon, Pender
89.5 Camden
89.0 Dare
88.5 Pamlico
88.0 Johnston
87.5 Clinton City, Currituck
87.0 Clay, Onslow, Person
86.5 Catawba, Granville, Randolph, Stokes
86.0 Avery, Perquimans, Yadkin
85.5 Davie, Haywood
85.0 Kings Mountain City
84.5 Alleghany, Chapel Hill-Carrboro City, Henderson, Stanly
84.0 Alexander, Edenton/Chowan, Mooresville City, Tyrrell
83.5 Hyde, Union, Wilkes, Yancey
83.0 Cabarrus, Sampson
82.5 Brunswick, Buncombe, Cherokee, Iredell-Statesville, New Hanover, Thomas Jefferson**
82.0 Cleveland, Franklin, Jackson, Newton-Conover City
81.5 Burke, Chatham, Craven, Lincoln, Pitt
81.0 Davidson, Jones, Moore, Swain
80.5 Asheboro City, Rockingham, Rutherford
80.0 Orange, Wake
7.9...5 Lee, Martin, Nash-Rocky Mount
2004 State 78.5 Asheville City, Bladen, Caldwell, Duplin, Richmond, Roanoke Rapids City
2002 State 78.0 Columbus, Gaston, Gates, Kannapolis City, Madison
2001 State 77.5 Lenoir, Shelby City
2003 State 77.0 Beaufort, Wilson
76.5 Caswell, Harnett, Scotland
2000 State 7.6...0 Rowan-Salisbury
1999 State 7.5...0 Mitchell, Montgomery
1998 State 74.0 Charlotte/Mecklenburg, Warren
1997 State 73.5
73.0 Alamance-Burlington, Rocky Mount Prep Sch**
72.5 Wayne, Winston-Salem/Forsyth
72....0 Anson, Cumberland, Guilford
7.0...5 Hickory City, Washington
69.5 Weldon City
69.0 Elizabeth City/Pasquotank
68.5 Hoke
68.0 Greene
67.5 Durham
67.0 Edgecombe
6.6...5 Whiteville City
65.0 Ann Atwater**
6.4...5 Robeson
6.2...5 Halifax, Northampton
61.5 Vance
61.0 Bertie
60.5 Thomasville City
60.0 Kestrel Heights**
5.9...5 Lexington City
5.8...5 Crossnore Academy**, Laurinburg Homework**
5.7...5 Grandfather Academy**
5.6...5 Hertford
4.5...5 Lakeside School**
4.3...5 Cape Lookout Marine**
4.1...0 Crossroads Charter**
3.5...5 Provisions Academy**
2.9...0 Alpha Academy**
2.5...0 Laurinburg Charter**
2.2...5 C.G. Woodson**
2.1...5 Kennedy Charter**
20.0 J.H. Baker Jr High**
Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG
test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). Percent passing is rounded up to the nearest half percent.
**Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix
Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed.
Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report.
Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program
Table 13. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard
Percent Passing* for the Class of 2007, at End of Grade 9, by LEA
2004 LEA Performance
32
Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04
State Percent Passing
>=..9. 5 Clover Garden**, Franklin Academy**, Kestrel Heights**, Lincoln Charter**, River Mill Academy**
>=..9. 5 Raleigh Charter HS**
>=..9. 5 Gray Stone Day**, Pender
>=95 Mount Airy City
>=..9. 5 McDowell
>=95 Carteret, East Wake Academy**, Granville, Transylvania, Woods Charter**
>=95 Clinton City, Macon, Onslow, Polk
94.5 Ashe, Elkin City, Mooresville City
94.0 Edenton/Chowan
93.5 Cherokee, Person, Randolph
93.0 Graham, Surry
92.5 Haywood, Pamlico, Pitt, Sampson, Watauga
92.0 Asheboro City, Catawba, Chatham, Davie, Stanly
91.5 Alexander, Alleghany, Buncombe, Cabarrus, Camden, Hyde, Kannapolis City, New Hanover, Union
91.0 Avery, Craven, Currituck, Dare, Johnston
90.5 Stokes, Thomas Jefferson**
90.0 Cleveland, Lee, Lenoir
89.5 Burke, Columbus, Gates, Laurinburg Homework**, Lincoln, Martin, Rockingham
89.0 Davidson, Yadkin
88.5 Beaufort, Brunswick, Henderson, Iredell-Statesville, Rutherford, Scotland, Wilkes
2003 State 88.0 Kings Mountain City, Moore, Roanoke Rapids City
2001 State 87.5 Jackson, Perquimans, Yancey
87.0 Asheville City, Franklin, Mitchell
2000, 2004 State 86.5 Gaston, Nash-Rocky Mount, Warren
2002 State 86.0 Duplin, Elizabeth City/Pasquotank
85.5 Orange
1998 State 85.0 Alamance-Burlington, Bladen, Caldwell, Chapel Hill-Carrboro City, Madison, Wake, Weldon City
1997,1999 State 84.5 Winston-Salem/Forsyth
84.0 Greene, Jones
83.5 Clay, Harnett, Swain, Wilson
83.0 Hoke, Newton-Conover City
82.5 Charlotte/Mecklenburg, Guilford, Montgomery, Richmond
82....0 Vance
81.0 Rowan-Salisbury, Shelby City
80.5 Caswell
8.0...0 Durham, Wayne
78.5 Anson, Hickory City
78.0 Cumberland
77.5 Northampton, Washington
77.0 Edgecombe
76.5 Halifax, Lexington City, Whiteville City
7.6...0 Thomasville City
7.5...0 Robeson
74.0 Tyrrell
7.3...5 Cape Lookout Marine**
7.2...5 Bertie
7.1...0 Rocky Mount Prep Sch**
70.0 Kennedy Charter**
6.9...5 Hertford
6.4...5 Provisions Academy**
6.0...0 Lakeside School**
4.4...5 Crossroads Charter**
3.3...5 Crossnore Academy**
2.6...0 Laurinburg Charter**
2.5...0 J.H. Baker Jr High**
6....5 C.G. Woodson**
*** Grandfather Academy**
Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG
test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). Percent passing is rounded up to the nearest half percent.
**Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix.
***Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed.
Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report.
Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program.
Table 14. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard
Percent Passing* for the Class of 2006, at End of Grade 10, by LEA
2004 LEA Performance
33
Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04
State Percent Passing
>=95 Gray Stone Day**, Thomas Jefferson**, Woods Charter**
>=95 Raleigh Charter HS**
>=95 Davie
>=95 Mount Airy City, Pamlico, Person
>=95 Asheboro City, Granville, Pender, Polk
>=95 Alexander, Asheville City, Carteret, Chatham, Haywood, McDowell, Scotland, Wataug
>=95 Clinton City, Onslow, Pitt, Surry
>=95 Elkin City, Johnston, Macon, Perquimans, Randolph
>=95 Cherokee, Edenton/Chowan, New Hanover, Rutherford, Weldon City, Yancey
>=95 Ashe, Cabarrus, Camden, Kings Mountain City, Mooresville City, Sampson, Stokes, Transylvania
94.5 Buncombe, Catawba, Currituck, Davidson, Jackson, Martin, Richmond
94.0 Clay, Craven, Iredell-Statesville, River Mill Academy**, Yadkin
93.5 Alamance-Burlington, Brunswick, Lincoln, Newton-Conover City, Roanoke Rapids City, Stanly
Swain, Tyrrell, Union
93.0 Beaufort, Cleveland, Dare, Kannapolis City, Nash-Rocky Mount, Thomasville City, Vance, Warren
92.5 Caswell, East Wake Academy**, Gates, Madison
92.0 Bladen, Halifax, Henderson, Lenoir, Mitchell, Rockingham, Wilkes
2001,2003,2004 State 91.5 Franklin, Hyde, Lee, Moore
2002 State 91.0 Charlotte/Mecklenburg, Graham, Jones, Orange
1997,1998 State 90.5 Duplin, Elizabeth City/Pasquotank, Hickory City, Winston-Salem/Forsyth
2000 State 90.0 Columbus, Hoke, Montgomery
89.5 Burke, Cape Lookout Marine**, Gaston, Greene, Wake
1999 State 89.0 Guilford, Harnett
88.5 Chapel Hill-Carrboro City, Durham
88.0 Caldwell, Lexington City, Washington
87.5 Alleghany, Avery, Edgecombe, Northampton
87.0 Rowan-Salisbury, Wilson
86.5 Robeson
85.5 Wayne
85.0 Cumberland
84.5 Lincoln Charter**, Whiteville City
83.5 Anson
81.0 Bertie
78.5 Hertford
78.0 Kennedy Charter**
77.0 Rocky Mount Prep Sch**
76.5 Laurinburg Homework**
73.0 Shelby City
57.5 J.H. Baker Jr High**
4.4...0 Crossroads Charter**
3.7...0 Laurinburg Charter**
<.=..5 C.G. Woodson**
*** Crossnore Academy**, Grandfather Academy**, Lakeside School**, Provisions Academy
Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance
on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). Percent passing is rounded up to the nearest half percent.
**Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix.
***Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0
percent, are not displayed.
Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report.
Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program.
Table 15. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard
Percent Passing* for the Class of 2005, at End of Grade 11, by LEA
2004 LEA Performance
34
Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04
State Percent Passing
>=95 East Wake Academy**, Graham, Mount Airy City, Provisions Academy**, Raleigh Charter HS**,
River Mill Academy**, Thomas Jefferson**, Woods Charter**
>=95 Asheboro City, Carteret, Orange, Person
>=95 Kings Mountain City, Macon, McDowell
>=95 Beaufort, Granville, Haywood, Kannapolis City, Onslow, Pamlico, Pender, Pitt, Randolph, Vance
>=95 Ashe, Asheville City, Chatham, Cherokee, Clay, Iredell-Statesville, Surry, Thomasville City
>=95 Alamance-Burlington, Alexander, Cabarrus, Clinton City, Davie, Elkin City, Lincoln, Watauga, Wilson
>=95 Buncombe, Nash-Rocky Mount, Sampson, Yancey
>=95 Elizabeth City/Pasquotank, Johnston, Madison, Roanoke Rapids City, Warren
>=95 Brunswick, Caswell, Jackson, Lee, Martin, New Hanover, Polk, Union
>=95 Davidson, Henderson, Scotland, Stanly, Transylvania, Washington, Weldon City, Yadkin
1998,2003 State >=95 Bladen, Camden, Catawba, Columbus, Gates, Hickory City, Mooresville City, Perquimans, Rockingham, Rutherford
2001,2004 State 94.5 Avery, Chapel Hill-Carrboro City, Craven, Dare, Gaston, Hyde, Stokes
2002 State 94.0 Caldwell, Cleveland, Currituck, Hoke, Moore, Richmond
93.5 Charlotte/Mecklenburg, Newton-Conover City, Swain
1999,2000 State 93.0 Burke, Duplin, Franklin, Greene
92.5 Cumberland, Harnett, Lenoir, Wake
92.0 Edenton/Chowan, Mitchell, Montgomery, Winston-Salem/Forsyth
91.5 Rowan-Salisbury, Whiteville City, Wilkes
91.0 Guilford, Northampton
90.5 Robeson, Wayne
90.0 Anson, Hertford, Tyrrell
89.5 Durham, Edgecombe
89.0 Bertie, Lexington City
88....5 Shelby City
87.5 Jones
87....0 Alleghany
85.0 Cape Lookout Marine**
84....5 Halifax
83....0 Crossroads Charter**
82....0 Laurinburg Homework**
78....0 J.H. Baker Jr High**
53....0 Laurinburg Charter**
31....0 Crossnore Academy**
*** C.G. Woodson**, Kennedy Charter**, Kestrel Heights**, Lakeside School**
Notes: *These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG
test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s). Percent passing is rounded up to the nearest half percent.
**Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix.
***Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed.
Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report.
Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program.
Table 16. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard
Percent Passing* for the Class of 2004, at End of Grade 12, by LEA
2004 LEA Performance
35
Student Performance
by
Class, Ethnicity, and Gender
by
LEA and Region
(former Technical Assistance Center Configuration)
37
Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04
Number
Passing
Final
Membership
Percent
Passing
Number
Passing
Final
Membership
Percent
Passing
Number
Passing
Final
Membership
Percent
Passing
Number
Passing
Final
Membership
Percent
Passing
Number
Passing
Final
Membership
Percent
Passing
Number
Passing
Final
Membership
Percent
Passing
Number
Passing
Final
Membership
Percent
Passing
State 85,116 109,466 77.8 1,111 1,550 71.7 1,775 2,118 83.8 20,834 33,075 63.0 3,588 6,080 59.0 1,531 1,879 81.5 56,277 64,764 86.9
Western Region 6,426 7,869 81.7 82 100 82.0 42 50 84.0 319 520 61.3 175 305 57.4 100 128 78.1 5,708 6,766 84.4
Buncombe 1,694 2,098 80.7 11 14 78.6 10 16 62.5 82 138 59.4 41 85 48.2 46 56 82.1 1,504 1,789 84.1
F Delany New School** 11 13 84.6 * 0 * * 0 * * 2 * * 1 * * 0 * 9 10 90.0
Evergreen Community** 37 41 90.2 * 0 * * 1 * * 3 * * 2 * * 2 * 30 33 90.9
Asheville City 202 276 73.2 * 0 * * 1 * 68 128 53.1 7 10 70 5 7 71.4 121 130 93.1
Cherokee 259 286 90.6 * 7 * * 2 * * 7 * * 3 * * 4 * 237 263 90.1
Clay 86 94 91.5 * 0 * * 1 * * 0 * * 1 * * 1 * 83 91 91.2
Graham 77 93 82.8 9 10 90.0 * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * 68 83 81.9
Haywood 508 615 82.6 * 4 * * 2 * 5 6 83.3 9 12 75.0 2 5 40.0 487 586 83.1
Henderson 855 1,024 83.5 * 3 * 8 9 88.9 20 37 54.1 55 89 61.8 10 17 58.8 759 869 87.3
Mountain Community** 13 18 72.2 * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * 13 18 72.2
Jackson 260 325 80.0 21 27 77.8 * 0 * * 1 * 3 9 33.3 * 5 * 230 283 81.3
Summit Charter** 14 16 87.5 * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * 14 16 87.5
Macon 245 305 80.3 * 2 * * 2 * 1 5 20.0 2 10 20.0 * 3 * 236 283 83.4
Madison 143 197 72.6 * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * 3 7 42.9 * 0 * 140 190 73.7
McDowell 439 519 84.6 * 2 * * 8 * 17 23 73.9 12 21 57.1 * 4 * 398 461 86.3
Mitchell 169 204 82.8 * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * * 4 ** * 1 * 166 199 83.4
Polk 174 201 86.6 * 0 * * 0 * 14 16 87.5 8 12 66.7 * 3 * 149 170 87.6
Rutherford 636 827 76.9 * 0 * * 2 * 89 136 65.4 16 25 64.0 12 13 92.3 517 651 79.4
Thomas Jefferson** 52 62 83.9 * 0 * * 0 * * 2 * * 0 * * 1 * 51 59 86.4
Swain 124 156 79.5 24 31 77.4 * 1 * * 0 * * 4 * * 1 * 95 119 79.8
Transylvania 252 298 84.6 * 0 * 4 5 80.0 10 14 71.4 * 4 * 4 5 80.0 232 270 85.9
Brevard Academy** 4 5 80.0 * 0 * * 0 * * 1 * * 0 * * 0 * * 4 *
Yancey 172 196 87.8 * 0 * * 0 * * 1 * 5 6 83.3 * 0 * 166 189 87.8
Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s).
*Performance data are not reported when final membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed.
The ethnic categories may not sum to total final membership and total number passing because ethnic category may not have been coded on some student answer sheets.
**Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix.
Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report.
Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program.
Total Multi-Racial White
Table 12a. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard
Percent Passing1 for the Class of 2008, at End of Grade 8, by LEA and Ethnicity
Western Region
American Indian Asian Black Hispanic
39
Membership
Percent
Passing Membership
Percent
Passing Membership
Percent
Passing Membership
Percent
Passing Membership
Percent
Passing Membership
Percent
Passing Membership
Percent
Passing
State 109,466 77.8 53,284 80.6 56,182 75.1 88,046 79.8 20,102 70.1 1,049 56.7 688 60.6
Western Region 7,869 81.7 3,727 84.3 4,142 79.3 6,615 82.1 1,095 82.4 135 62.2 21 47.6
Buncombe 2,098 80.7 1,015 83.4 1,083 78.2 2,094 80.9 0 * 0 * 4 *
Asheville City 276 73.2 126 76.2 150 70.7 276 73.2 0 * 0 * 0 *
F Delany New School** 13 84.6 4 * 9 88.9 10 90.0 0 * 3 * 0 *
Evergreen Community** 41 90.2 12 * 29 86.2 1 * 0 * 40 92.5 0 *
Cherokee 286 90.6 127 92.1 159 89.3 211 89.6 75 93.3 0 * 0 *
Clay 94 91.5 42 88.1 52 94.2 94 91.5 0 * 0 * 0 *
Graham 93 82.8 44 >=95 49 71.4 93 82.8 0 * 0 * 0 *
Haywood 615 82.6 286 83.2 329 82.1 556 86.7 0 * 56 44.6 3 *
Henderson 1,024 83.5 460 86.1 564 81.4 1,013 83.7 0 * 0 * 11 63.6
40
Mountain Community** 18 72.2 6 33.3 12 91.7 0 * 0 * 18 72.2 0 *
Jackson 325 80.0 156 83.3 169 76.9 28 64.3 287 84.0 6 * 2 *
Summit Charter** 16 87.5 8 * 8 75.0 16 87.5 0 * 0 * 0 *
Macon 305 80.3 137 89.8 168 72.6 27 88.9 278 79.5 0 * 0 *
Madison 197 72.6 92 76.1 105 69.5 197 72.6 0 * 0 * 0 *
McDowell 519 84.6 260 86.2 259 83.0 519 84.6 0 * 0 * 0 *
Mitchell 204 82.8 105 81.9 99 83.8 0 * 204 82.8 0 * 0 *
Polk 201 86.6 106 84.9 95 88.4 201 86.6 0 * 0 * 0 *
Rutherford 827 76.9 387 80.4 440 73.9 826 76.9 1 * 0 * 0 *
Thomas Jefferson** 62 83.9 28 82.1 34 85.3 55 89.1 0 * 7 42.9 0 *
Swain 156 79.5 76 85.5 80 73.8 0 * 156 79.5 0 * 0 *
Transylvania 298 84.6 144 88.2 154 81.2 297 84.8 0 * 0 * 0 *
Brevard Academy** 5 80.0 2 * 3 * 0 * 5 80.0 0 * 0 *
Yancey 196 87.8 104 87.5 92 88.0 101 94.1 89 80.9 5 80.0 1 *
Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s).
*Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed.
The gender categories may not sum to total membership because gender category may not have been coded on some student answer sheets.
**Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix.
Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this table.
Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program.
Table 12b. 2003-04 North Carolina Competency Tests Percent Passing the Standard1
for the Class of 2008, at the End of Grade 8, by LEA, Gender, Title I, and Migrant Students
Western Region
Total Female Male Not Served by Title I
Schoolwide Title I
Program Targeted Assistance Migrant
Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04
Number
Passing
Final
Membership
Percent
Passing
Number
Passing
Final
Membership
Percent
Passing
Number
Passing
Final
Membership
Percent
Passing
Number
Passing
Final
Membership
Percent
Passing
Number
Passing
Final
Membership
Percent
Passing
Number
Passing
Final
Membership
Percent
Passing
Number
Passing
Final
Membership
Percent
Passing
State 85,116 109,466 77.8 1,111 1,550 71.7 1,775 2,118 83.8 20,834 33,075 63.0 3,588 6,080 59.0 1,531 1,879 81.5 56,277 64,764 86.9
Northwest Region 13,674 16,994 80.5 22 37 59.5 358 430 83.3 1,664 2,728 61.0 568 987 57.5 214 269 79.6 10,848 12,543 86.5
Alexander 326 400 81.5 * 0 * 14 19 73.7 17 28 60.7 7 13 53.8 * 2 * 287 338 84.9
Alleghany 117 133 88.0 * 0 * * 0 * * 1 * 4 7 57.1 * 0 * 112 125 89.6
Ashe 210 228 92.1 * 2 * * 1 * * 1 * * 4 * * 2 * 201 218 92.2
Avery 125 151 82.8 * 1 * * 0 * * 0 * 3 8 37.5 * 0 * 122 142 85.9
Grandfather Academy** 6 7 85.7 * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * 6 7 85.7
Crossnore Academy** * 4 * * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * * 4 *
Burke 982 1,258 78.1 * 1 * 100 119 84.0 52 85 61.2 33 58 56.9 14 18 77.8 783 977 80.1
Caldwell 870 1,025 84.9 * 0 * * 8 * 51 72 70.8 19 32 59.4 15 18 83.3 777 895 86.8
Catawba 1,141 1,355 84.2 * 3 * 79 97 81.4 59 93 63.4 38 56 67.9 24 28 85.7 939 1,078 87.1
Hickory City 297 381 78.0 * 0 * 26 32 81.3 66 101 65.3 21 38 55.3 7 13 53.8 177 197 89.8
Newton-Conover City 200 241 83.0 * 0 * 18 19 94.7 27 45 60.0 16 23 69.6 * 6 * 133 148 89.9
Davidson 1,367 1,624 84.2 5 8 62.5 7 10 70.0 35 50 70.0 28 40 70.0 9 11 81.8 1,283 1,505 85.2
Lexington City 149 233 63.9 * 1 * 13 19 68.4 61 103 59.2 17 35 48.6 * 8 * 50 67 74.6
Thomasville City 131 202 64.9 * 0 * * 0 * 60 100 60.0 15 25 60.0 4 7 57.1 52 70 74.3
Davie 432 493 87.6 * 0 * * 0 * 32 43 74.4 11 19 57.9 8 10 80.0 381 421 90.5
Winston-Salem/Forsyth 2,829 3,883 72.9 7 12 58.3 31 36 86.1 823 1,442 57.1 153 335 45.7 72 91 79.1 1,743 1,967 88.6
Quality Education** 20 24 83.3 * 0 * * 0 * 20 24 83.3 * 0 * * 0 * * 0 *
Downtown Middle** 81 92 88.0 * 1 * * 0 * 44 52 84.6 * 1 * * 3 * 33 35 94.3
C.G. Woodson** 18 22 81.8 * 0 * * 0 * 17 20 85.0 * 2 * * 0 * * 0 *
Forsyth Academies** 27 36 75.0 * 1 * * 0 * 10 16 62.5 * 2 * * 0 * 15 17 88.2
Iredell-Statesville 1,224 1,481 82.6 * 4 * 32 37 86.5 145 240 60.4 65 89 73.0 8 13 61.5 971 1,098 88.4
American Ren. Middle** 36 44 81.8 * 0 * * 0 * * 4 * * 1 * * 0 * 34 39 87.2
Success Institute** 2 5 40.0 * 0 * * 0 * 2 5 40.0 * 0 * * 0 * * 0 *
Mooresville City 327 384 85.2 * 0 * 6 7 85.7 45 69 65.2 8 10 80.0 * 7 * 261 291 89.7
Stokes 496 599 82.8 * 1 * * 1 * 18 29 62.1 7 9 77.8 7 8 87.5 462 551 83.8
Surry 607 735 82.6 * 1 * * 3 * 14 27 51.9 39 55 70.9 * 6 * 545 643 84.8
Elkin City 84 101 83.2 * 0 * * 1 * * 4 * 8 17 47.1 * 1 * 71 78 91.0
Mount Airy City 143 155 92.3 * 0 * * 5 * 14 19 73.7 * 4 * * 0 * * 127 >=95
Watauga 345 376 91.8 * 0 * 4 5 80.0 * 4 * * 7 71.4 8 10 80.0 324 350 92.6
Wilkes 688 808 85.1 * 0 * 9 10 90.0 26 30 86.7 26 38 68.4 * 5 * 622 725 85.8
Bridges** 5 10 50.0 * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * 5 10 50.0
Yadkin 387 504 76.8 * 1 * * 1 * 16 21 76.2 34 59 57.6 * 2 * 336 420 80.0
Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s).
*Performance data are not reported when final membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed.
The ethnic categories may not sum to total final membership and total number passing because ethnic category may not have been coded on some student answer sheets.
**Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix.
Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this report.
Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program.
Table 12c. 2003-04 Student Performance on Competency Standard
Percent Passing1 for the Class of 2008, at End of Grade 8, by LEA and Ethnicity
Northwest Region
Total American Indian Asian Black Hispanic Multi-Racial White
41
Membership
Percent
Passing Membership
Percent
Passing Membership
Percent
Passing Membership
Percent
Passing Membership
Percent
Passing Membership
Percent
Passing Membership
Percent
Passing
State 109,466 77.8 53,284 80.6 56,182 75.1 88,046 79.8 20,102 70.1 1,049 56.7 688 60.6
Northwest Region 16,994 80.5 8,206 83.1 8,788 78.0 14,767 82.1 1,553 72.8 641 62.9 28 53.6
Alexander 400 81.5 190 82.1 210 81.0 352 87.2 0 * 48 39.6 0 *
Alleghany 133 88.0 62 88.7 71 87.3 0 * 133 88.0 0 * 1 *
Ashe 228 92.1 100 >=95 128 89.1 228 92.1 0 * 0 * 0 *
Avery 151 82.8 62 83.9 89 82.0 0 * 151 82.8 0 * 0 *
Grandfather Academy** 7 85.7 3 * 4 * 0 * 7 85.7 0 * 0 *
Crossnore Academy** 4 * 3 * 1 * 0 * 4 * 0 * 0 *
Burke 1,258 78.1 619 81.4 639 74.8 1,257 78.1 0 * 0 * 0 *
Caldwell 1,025 84.9 505 87.7 520 82.1 504 86.7 521 83.1 0 * 0 *
Catawba 1,355 84.2 669 84.6 686 83.8 1,355 84.2 0 * 0 * 0 *
Hickory City 381 78.0 197 78.2 184 77.7 1 * 176 71.6 204 83.8 0 *
Newton-Conover City 241 83.0 121 82.6 120 83.3 241 83.0 0 * 0 * 0 *
Davidson 1,624 84.2 801 87.0 823 81.4 1,624 84.2 0 * 0 * 0 *
42
Lexington City 233 63.9 109 67.0 124 61.3 0 * 233 63.9 0 * 0 *
Thomasville City 202 64.9 105 65.7 97 63.9 202 64.9 0 * 0 * 0 *
Davie 493 87.6 252 87.7 241 87.6 478 89.1 0 * 15 40.0 0 *
Winston-Salem/Forsyth 3,883 72.9 1,860 75.6 2,023 70.3 3,307 77.0 250 43.2 324 54.0 0 *
Quality Education** 24 83.3 8 * 16 75.0 0 * 24 83.3 0 * 0 *
Downtown Middle** 92 88.0 41 90.2 51 86.3 88 90.9 0 * 4 * 0 *
C.G. Woodson** 22 81.8 13 92.3 9 66.7 0 * 0 * 22 81.8 0 *
Forsyth Academies** 36 75.0 23 78.3 13 69.2 22 81.8 0 * 14 64.3 0 *
Iredell-Statesville 1,481 82.6 665 86.9 816 79.2 1,474 82.9 6 16.7 0 * 1 *
American Ren. Middle** 44 81.8 21 76.2 23 87.0 44 81.8 0 * 0 * 0 *
Success Institute** 5 40.0 2 * 3 * 0 * 0 * 5 40.0 0 *
Mooresville City 384 85.2 211 89.1 173 80.3 384 85.2 0 * 0 * 0 *
Stokes 599 82.8 268 86.6 331 79.8 599 82.8 0 * 0 * 0 *
Surry 735 82.6 327 89.9 408 76.7 726 82.8 4 * 0 * 4 *
Elkin City 101 83.2 54 83.3 47 83.0 101 83.2 0 * 0 * 0 *
Mount Airy City 155 92.3 74 93.2 81 91.4 155 92.3 0 * 0 * 0 *
Watauga 376 91.8 166 92.8 210 91.0 331 92.1 44 88.6 1 * 0 *
Wilkes 808 85.1 407 87.7 401 82.5 791 85.6 0 * 0 * 17 64.7
Bridges** 10 50.0 5 60.0 5 40.0 10 50.0 0 * 0 * 0 *
Yadkin 504 76.8 263 80.6 241 72.6 493 77.9 0 * 4 * 5 40.0
Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s).
*Performance data are not reported when membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed.
The gender categories may not sum to total membership because gender category may not have been coded on some student answer sheets.
**Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix.
Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in this table.
Prepared by the NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program.
Table 12d. 2003-04 North Carolina Competency Tests Percent Passing the Standard1
for the Class of 2008, at the End of Grade 8, by LEA, Gender, Title I, and Migrant Students
Northwest Region
Total Female Male Not Served by Title I
Schoolwide Title I
Program Targeted Assistance Migrant
Report of Student Performance on the North Carolina Competency Standard, 2003-04
Number
Passing
Final
Membership
Percent
Passing
Number
Passing
Final
Membership
Percent
Passing
Number
Passing
Final
Membership
Percent
Passing
Number
Passing
Final
Membership
Percent
Passing
Number
Passing
Final
Membership
Percent
Passing
Number
Passing
Final
Membership
Percent
Passing
Number
Passing
Final
Membership
Percent
Passing
State 85,116 109,466 77.8 1,111 1,550 71.7 1,775 2,118 83.8 20,834 33,075 63.0 3,588 6,080 59.0 1,531 1,879 81.5 56,277 64,764 86.9
Southwest Region 18,965 24,434 77.6 169 246 68.7 478 570 83.9 4,816 7,746 62.2 879 1,445 60.8 232 274 84.7 12,391 14,153 87.6
Anson 214 337 63.5 * 0 * 4 6 66.7 107 209 51.2 * 1 * * 0 * 103 121 85.1
Cabarrus 1,531 1,782 85.9 9 10 90.0 * 21 >=95 188 276 68.1 80 127 63.0 24 27 88.9 1,210 1,321 91.6
Kannapolis City 253 371 68.2 * 1 * * 4 * 54 110 49.1 23 40 57.5 9 10 90.0 164 206 79.6
Cleveland 635 763 83.2 * 1 * * 3 * 141 187 75.4 9 13 69.2 10 11 90.9 472 548 86.1
Kings Mountain City 349 411 84.9 * 0 * * 8 * 71 99 71.7 4 5 80.0 * 9 * 257 290 88.6
Shelby City 176 259 68.0 * 0 * * 0 * 91 154 59.1 * 2 * * 3 * 83 100 83.0
Gaston 1,970 2,609 75.5 6 7 85.7 40 44 90.9 302 520 58.1 61 110 55.5 15 22 68.2 1,546 1,906 81.1
Piedmont Community** 18 22 81.8 * 0 * * 0 * * 1 * * 2 * * 0 * 17 19 89.5
Hoke 355 512 69.3 42 70 60.0 * 0 * 167 256 65.2 17 33 51.5 12 14 85.7 117 139 84.2
Lincoln 763 920 82.9 * 2 * * 2 * 65 92 70.7 41 58 70.7 10 12 83.3 643 754 85.3
Lincoln Charter** 38 41 92.7 * 1 * * 0 * * 0 * * 0 * * 1 * 36 39 92.3
Charlotte/Mecklenburg 6,581 8,731 75.4 28 38 73.7 313 373 83.9 2,507 4,000 62.7 405 692 58.5 57 65 87.7 3,271 3,563 91.8
Kennedy Charter** 3 12 25.0 * 0 * * 0 * 3 11 27.3 * 1 * * 0 * * 0 *
Lake Norman** * 148 >=95 * 0 * * 4 * 6 7 85.7 * 0 * * 1 * * 136 >=95
Sugar Creek** 22 48 45.8 * 0 * * 2 * 19 44 43.2 * 0 * * 0 * * 2 *
Metrolina** * 12 * * 0 * * 2 * * 1 * * 0 * * 0 * * 9 *
Montgomery 258 365 70.7 * 2 * * 9 * 54 100 54.0 32 48 66.7 * 4 * 159 202 78.7
Moore 861 1,025 84.0 10 13 76.9 * 4 * 168 243 69.1 39 52 75.0 15 18 83.3 626 695 90.1
Academy of Moore County** 20 30 66.7 * 0 * * 0 * 6 9 66.7 * 0 * * 1 * 14 20 70.0
Richmond 502 663 75.7 17 23 73.9 4 5 80.0 163 270 60.4 18 19 94.7 * 8 * 292 338 86.4
Rowan-Salisbury 1,361 1,754 77.6 6 9 66.7 12 20 60.0 226 376 60.1 47 73 64.4 18 22 81.8 1,052 1,254 83.9
Scotland 402 546 73.6 38 58 65.5 6 7 85.7 145 232 62.5 * 3 * 7 9 77.8 204 237 86.1
Laurinburg Homework** * 4 * * 2 * * 0 * * 2 * * 0 * * 0 * * 0 *
Stanly 691 842 82.1 * 0 * 28 37 75.7 86 123 69.9 15 21 71.4 9 13 69.2 553 648 85.3
Union 1,804 2,227 81.0 7 9 77.8 16 19 84.2 246 424 58 84 145 57.9 22 24 91.7 1,429 1,606 89.0
Notes: 1These data represent the most recent performance of each student for all test administrations in which the student participated. Passing includes successful performance on grade 8 EOG test(s), competency test(s), or competency screen(s).
*Performance data are not reported when final membership is fewer than five. Performance data that are less than or equal to 5.0 percent, or greater than or equal to 95.0 percent, are not displayed.
The ethnic categories may not sum to total final membership and total number passing because ethnic category may not have been coded on some student answer sheets.
**Denotes a charter school. For reporting purposes the charter school name has been abbreviated; the complete charter school name can be found in the Appendix.
Data received from LEAs and charter schools after July 15, 2004 are not included in