NCSPA port business case project - Page 107 |
Previous | 107 of 230 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
Subset
|
Port Business Case Study North Carolina State Ports Authority
Moffatt & Nichol | 2BForecast Volumes Moving Through NCSPA Facilities Page 79
Operator/grouping Operation
Actual Operator
(no of ships)
Full Port Rotation
UASC/Hanjin/K Line MINA/IMU/SIA UASC (6)/Hanjin (2) NYJ, NFK, SAV, VLC, GOA, PSD, JED, KLF, BQM, JNP,
JED, PSD, SPE, GOA, BCN, VLC, ALG, NYJ
Note: Atlantic ports called are listed in bold text. Information correct at time of writing. Shipping schedules are subject to change. Number of ships is
listed per operator if more than one shipping line is contributing tonnage because supply of vessels influences port choice and rotation. The Mid East
region includes Red Sea and Indian ports. * = a 21-day frequency using multi-purpose vessels with some container carrying capacity.
Source: Moffatt & Nichol, derived from published shipping line schedules
There are several current shipping line services that utilize several major regions, most notably linking Asia
with North America before onward sailing to North Europe or the Mediterranean. For the purposes of this
assessment, these strings have been referred to as Round-the-Word (RTW) or Multi-Region, as Table 3.22
identifies.
The Atlantic port region represents an integral part of all schedules, with calls made on both eastbound and
westbound legs of the services. This enables Asian cargo to be discharged at US ports, before US goods
bound for North Europe/Mediterranean can be loaded, with the reverse happening on the return leg.
With this type of service covering a greater nautical distance than other trading routes previously identified,
it means that there is a need to utilize more ships to maintain a weekly frequency.
On almost all schedules, the ocean carriers are adopting calls in both the North and South Atlantic regions,
with NYNJ, Norfolk, Charleston and Savannah the preferred port partners though it is noticeable that the
first-in or last-outbound port of call is often varied on eastbound and westbound legs of the service.
This further reflects the need to maintain calls in both regions but means that competition between ports
situated in that area, such as Charleston and Savannah, is maintained to attract the liner operator’s calls, as
the ocean carrier looks to maintain leverage and secure more competitive costs and terms for undertaking
port calls.
Table 3.22: Weekly Atlantic Liner Shipping Services – RTW/Multi-Region, Q3 2010
Operator/grouping Operation
Actual
Operator
(no of ships)
Ports called
Evergreen NUE Evergreen
SHA, NBO, QIN, PUS, LAX, CCT, CHS, NFK, NYJ, ANR,
BRV, THP, RTM, LEH, NYJ, CHS, CCT, LAX, OAK, TOK,
SHA
Grand Alliance PAX Hapag Lloyd
YOK, KOB, KHH, YTN, HKG, DCB, KOB, NGY, TOK,
SEA, OAK, MIT, SAV, NFK, NYJ, HFX, THP, ANR, BRV,
RTM, HFX, NYJ, NFK, SAV, MIT, LGB, OAK, YOK
Object Description
Description
| Title | NCSPA port business case project - Page 107 |
| Full Text | Port Business Case Study North Carolina State Ports Authority Moffatt & Nichol | 2BForecast Volumes Moving Through NCSPA Facilities Page 79 Operator/grouping Operation Actual Operator (no of ships) Full Port Rotation UASC/Hanjin/K Line MINA/IMU/SIA UASC (6)/Hanjin (2) NYJ, NFK, SAV, VLC, GOA, PSD, JED, KLF, BQM, JNP, JED, PSD, SPE, GOA, BCN, VLC, ALG, NYJ Note: Atlantic ports called are listed in bold text. Information correct at time of writing. Shipping schedules are subject to change. Number of ships is listed per operator if more than one shipping line is contributing tonnage because supply of vessels influences port choice and rotation. The Mid East region includes Red Sea and Indian ports. * = a 21-day frequency using multi-purpose vessels with some container carrying capacity. Source: Moffatt & Nichol, derived from published shipping line schedules There are several current shipping line services that utilize several major regions, most notably linking Asia with North America before onward sailing to North Europe or the Mediterranean. For the purposes of this assessment, these strings have been referred to as Round-the-Word (RTW) or Multi-Region, as Table 3.22 identifies. The Atlantic port region represents an integral part of all schedules, with calls made on both eastbound and westbound legs of the services. This enables Asian cargo to be discharged at US ports, before US goods bound for North Europe/Mediterranean can be loaded, with the reverse happening on the return leg. With this type of service covering a greater nautical distance than other trading routes previously identified, it means that there is a need to utilize more ships to maintain a weekly frequency. On almost all schedules, the ocean carriers are adopting calls in both the North and South Atlantic regions, with NYNJ, Norfolk, Charleston and Savannah the preferred port partners though it is noticeable that the first-in or last-outbound port of call is often varied on eastbound and westbound legs of the service. This further reflects the need to maintain calls in both regions but means that competition between ports situated in that area, such as Charleston and Savannah, is maintained to attract the liner operator’s calls, as the ocean carrier looks to maintain leverage and secure more competitive costs and terms for undertaking port calls. Table 3.22: Weekly Atlantic Liner Shipping Services – RTW/Multi-Region, Q3 2010 Operator/grouping Operation Actual Operator (no of ships) Ports called Evergreen NUE Evergreen SHA, NBO, QIN, PUS, LAX, CCT, CHS, NFK, NYJ, ANR, BRV, THP, RTM, LEH, NYJ, CHS, CCT, LAX, OAK, TOK, SHA Grand Alliance PAX Hapag Lloyd YOK, KOB, KHH, YTN, HKG, DCB, KOB, NGY, TOK, SEA, OAK, MIT, SAV, NFK, NYJ, HFX, THP, ANR, BRV, RTM, HFX, NYJ, NFK, SAV, MIT, LGB, OAK, YOK |
Tags
Add tags for NCSPA port business case project - Page 107
Comments
Post a Comment for NCSPA port business case project - Page 107
