Page 39 |
Previous | 39 of 168 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
|
This page
All
|
(millions of (hort tons)
Po rt/T«mi n« 1
To^a 1 -id to
Lon 5-T«rn'
Vessel Sixe Cxlsciag Capacity Cap«city
(10*
Expansion Zit eciive
(DWT) do" tons) tons) Capac
(10
ity, 1985
Existing ProDOsed Des igned Effective Planned Undcrxa"f
tans)
80,000 5.0
60,000 S.O 2.S 6.5
3S,000 2.0
30,000 7.5
XOO.OOO* 10.0 10.0
70,000 100,000* 27.2 16.6 IJ.O 6.5 34.1
BO, 000 100, 000* 58.0
8.0
29.0
4.0
7.3
1.0
36.3
80,000 100. 000* 33.0
14.6
16.5
S.3
S.O
S.O
16.5
10.3
50,000 10 0,00 0* 10.0 10.0
50,000 100,000* S.O
40,000 50,000 S.O
50,000 70,000 7.S
30,000 43,000 5.0
Cast Coast
We- York, New Yorlt (P)
Philadelphia- Pier 124 (E)
Caaden, New Jersey (P)
WiltilnTton, Delaware (?)
Lower Delaware Bay (P)
Balticiorc (C)
Nortolk-?ier-6-North (E)
Pier-S-South (E)
Newport News-Pier 14 (E)
Pier 15 (E)
Pier 9 (E)
Ponsmouth (P)
Horehead City (P)
Oiarlcston (P)
Savannah (P)
Brunswick (P)
Total Ease Coast 145.8 73.9 81.3 18.0 173.2
Culf Coast
Mobile (E) 60,000 100,000+ 11.0 S 5.0 10.5
New Orleans-Oavant (E) 60,000 100,000* 14.0 7.0 3.0
10.0
Myrtle Grove (E) 60,000 100,000* 6.0 3.0 9.0
12.0
Mile 118 (P) 60,000 100,000* 4.0
4.0
60.000 100,000* 5. S
60,000 100,000* 5.0 2.0 4.0
60,000 100.000* 2.0
55,000 100,000* 10.0
75.000 100.000* 0.5
Baton Rouge (Bumside) (C) S.O 6.0
Port Arthur (P) 60.000 2-0
Galveston (P) 10.0
Corpus Ciristi (P) 0-5
Total Culf Coast 36.0 17.5 32.5 5.0 55.0
(E) Existing Facility
(P) Pocentlal Facility
Source: .MarUlae Adaln Iscrac Ion . The columns shoutn? capacity expansion and effective ca=acl:v are not
dependent upon the deepening of channels at the respective ports; however, the colur.n showtn;
proposed vessel s Lt e is dependent upon the cocpletlon of dredgLng projects.
Based on survey of U.S. ports, usljig 193 5 as nomLnal date for aid- to long term coal port development plans.
Figure 1. Existing and Potertial Effective Capac:ity for Handling Export
Coal at U.S. Ports
16
Object Description
Description
| Title | Page 39 |
| Full Text | (millions of (hort tons) Po rt/T«mi n« 1 To^a 1 -id to Lon 5-T«rn' Vessel Sixe Cxlsciag Capacity Cap«city (10* Expansion Zit eciive (DWT) do" tons) tons) Capac (10 ity, 1985 Existing ProDOsed Des igned Effective Planned Undcrxa"f tans) 80,000 5.0 60,000 S.O 2.S 6.5 3S,000 2.0 30,000 7.5 XOO.OOO* 10.0 10.0 70,000 100,000* 27.2 16.6 IJ.O 6.5 34.1 BO, 000 100, 000* 58.0 8.0 29.0 4.0 7.3 1.0 36.3 80,000 100. 000* 33.0 14.6 16.5 S.3 S.O S.O 16.5 10.3 50,000 10 0,00 0* 10.0 10.0 50,000 100,000* S.O 40,000 50,000 S.O 50,000 70,000 7.S 30,000 43,000 5.0 Cast Coast We- York, New Yorlt (P) Philadelphia- Pier 124 (E) Caaden, New Jersey (P) WiltilnTton, Delaware (?) Lower Delaware Bay (P) Balticiorc (C) Nortolk-?ier-6-North (E) Pier-S-South (E) Newport News-Pier 14 (E) Pier 15 (E) Pier 9 (E) Ponsmouth (P) Horehead City (P) Oiarlcston (P) Savannah (P) Brunswick (P) Total Ease Coast 145.8 73.9 81.3 18.0 173.2 Culf Coast Mobile (E) 60,000 100,000+ 11.0 S 5.0 10.5 New Orleans-Oavant (E) 60,000 100,000* 14.0 7.0 3.0 10.0 Myrtle Grove (E) 60,000 100,000* 6.0 3.0 9.0 12.0 Mile 118 (P) 60,000 100,000* 4.0 4.0 60.000 100,000* 5. S 60,000 100,000* 5.0 2.0 4.0 60,000 100.000* 2.0 55,000 100,000* 10.0 75.000 100.000* 0.5 Baton Rouge (Bumside) (C) S.O 6.0 Port Arthur (P) 60.000 2-0 Galveston (P) 10.0 Corpus Ciristi (P) 0-5 Total Culf Coast 36.0 17.5 32.5 5.0 55.0 (E) Existing Facility (P) Pocentlal Facility Source: .MarUlae Adaln Iscrac Ion . The columns shoutn? capacity expansion and effective ca=acl:v are not dependent upon the deepening of channels at the respective ports; however, the colur.n showtn; proposed vessel s Lt e is dependent upon the cocpletlon of dredgLng projects. Based on survey of U.S. ports, usljig 193 5 as nomLnal date for aid- to long term coal port development plans. Figure 1. Existing and Potertial Effective Capac:ity for Handling Export Coal at U.S. Ports 16 |
