N o r t h C a r o l i n a L i c e n s i n g B o a r d f o r G e n e r a l C o n t r a c t o r s
V o l u m e X X I V
W i n t e r / S p r i n g
2 0 0 5
N u m b e r 1
In this Issue
New Rules Become Effective
in March 2005 1
Governor Appoints Jerry Smith
To Licensing Board 1
2004 Homeowners Recovery
Fund Report 2
Child Labor Laws Information
For Employers 2
Loaning, Sharing Your General
Contractors License—Not
A Good Idea 3
Disciplinary Action 5
Licensing Board
Calendar
Good Friday/Board Office Closed
March 25, 2005
Regular Board Meeting
April 13, 2005
Memorial Day/Board Office Closed
May 30, 2005
Independence Day/Board Office
Closed
July 4, 2005
Regular Board Meeting
July 13, 2005
Labor Day/Board Office Closed
September 5, 2005 Jerry Smith, Senior Vice President and
Co-Division Manager of the Utilities
Division for T.A. Loving Company,
Goldsboro, has been appointed by Gov-ernor
Mike Easley to the Licensing Board. Mr.
Smith replaces R. Kelly Barnhill as the public
utility contractor member on the Licensing
Board.
Mr. Smith’s appointment began February 2,
2005 and his term expires December 31,
2009. Mr. Smith started his career with T.A.
Loving Company in 1967 as a rod man on a
survey crew, working his way to superinten-dent
and project manager, and became Utility
Division Co-Manager in 1988. He is currently
Division Manager and member of the com-pany’s
Board of Directors. Mr. Smith has been
a leader in North Carolina’s construction in-dustry
through his affiliation with several
industry associations, including Carolinas AGC,
where he served on its Board of Directors as
Utility Division Vice Chairman and Chairman.
Currently he is a member of the North
Carolina Underground Utility Damage Pre-vention
Coalition and NC Utility Contractors
Association Board of Directors. Mr. Smith has
been married to his wife Agnes for 40 years
and has two sons, Eddie and Jeff.
Governor Appoints Jerry Smith To
Licensing Board
Bulletin
The Licensing Board began proceedings
in September 2004 to amend several
rules contained in 21 NCAC 12. The
two rules become effective March 1,
2005. The Board conducted a public hearing on
October 13, 2004 in order to receive public com-ment
on the proposed amendments, which were
published in the September 1, 2004 issue of The
North Carolina Register.
Rule .0204 (a)(4) Eligibility, is amended to
include provisions requiring limited license
applicants to provide an audited financial state-ment
as part of an application if the applicant is
in bankruptcy. The rule is designed to assure that
limited license holders are financially responsible
and fiscally stable.
Rule .0903 (a), Application for Payment, requires
applicants in Homeowners Recovery Fund
claims, when claiming against the estate of a
deceased general contractor, to submit a state-ment
from the estate administrator that the
claimant will not receive payment from the
estate. The rule allows such applicants to proceed
against the Homeowners Recovery Fund without
needless delay.
Text of the actual rules is printed below. The
portion of text with strike-through is deleted and
new text is underlined.
SECTION .0200 — LICENSING
REQUIREMENTS
21 NCAC 12.0204 Eligibility
(a) Limited License. The applicant for such a
license must:
(1) Be entitled to be admitted to the examination
given by the Board in light of the require-ments
set out in G.S. 87-10 and Section .0400
of this Chapter;
(2) Be financially stable to the extent that the
total current assets of the applicant or the
firm or corporation he represents exceed the
total current liabilities by at least seventeen
thousand dollars ($17,000.00); and
(3) Successfully complete 70 percent of the
examination given the applicant by the Board
dealing with the specified contracting classifi-cation
chosen by the applicant. applicant; and
continued on page 4
New Rules Become Effective In March 2005
RULES CHANGE CERTAIN FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS,
RECOVERY FUND APPLICATION PROCEDURES
Following 21 hearings on claims
presented to the Board in 2004,
a total of $421,405 has been
awarded from the Homeowners
Recovery Fund to eligible claimants. In
December 2003, the Homeowners Re-covery
Fund Review Committee consid-ered
30 claims before the recovery fund,
dismissing nine of the claims and refer-ring
the remainder of the eligible claims
to the Board for a hearing in 2004.
Persons who file claims with the Home-owners
Recovery Fund must meet specif-ic
criteria and must demonstrate to the
Board that they have suffered a reim-bursable
loss in the construction or
alteration of a single-family dwelling
unit. The Homeowners Recovery Fund is
generated from fees paid to local govern-ment
inspection departments by licensed
general contractors who apply for build-ing
permits in the construction of single-family
dwelling units. As of January
2005, the recovery fund’s net worth is
$723,200.
Below is a list of awards ordered by the
Board in 2004 to eligible claimants,
including the names of the general con-tractors
whose conduct caused reim-bursable
losses to claimants.
NCLBGC Bulletin
Published semi-annually as a service to
general contractor licensees to promote
a better understanding of the General
Contractors Licensing law (N.C.G.S.
§87-1 to 87-15.9) and to provide informa-tion
of interest to construction profession-als
and the public.
NORTH CAROLINA
LICENSING BOARD for
GENERAL CONTRACTORS
3739 National Drive, Suite 225
P.O. Box 17187
Raleigh, NC 27619
Telephone: (919) 571-4183
Fax: (919) 571-4703
www.nclbgc.org
BOARD MEMBERS
J. Sam Pierce, Chairman
Cramerton
Larry D. Miller, Vice-Chairman
Marion
Michael L. Barber, Greensboro
Robert P. Hopkins, P.E., Raleigh
Susan J. Monroe, Fayetteville
Graham T. Moore, Fayetteville
J. Jerry Smith, Goldsboro
Carolyn W. Thomasson, Charlotte
Carl E. Worsley, Jr., Nags Head
ADMINISTRATION
Mark D. Selph, Secretary-Treasurer
Nancy G. Routh, Associate Secretary-
Treasurer
Joan C. Rice, Finance/Administration
June M. Napier, Administration/Exam
Reviews
Frances W. McDonald, Licensing Manager
Cherie Sutton, License Renewal Manager
Stephanie Graham, Licensing/
Customer Service
Debbie Price, Licensing & Records
Specialist
Connie Bartlett, Recovery Fund/Renewal
Specialist
Brenda Thomas, Reception/Information
Pam Tew, Renewals
Mozelle King, Renewals
LEGAL
Phyllis G. Jewell, Dir./Legal Operations
Bailey & Dixon, L.L.P., General Counsel
INVESTIGATIONS
Linda Smith, Field Inv/Eastern NC
Joel A. Macon, Field Inv/ Coastal NC (SE)
Mike Brown, Field Inv/Coastal NC (NE)
J. Michael Silver, Field Inv/Western NC
Kenneth B. McCombs, Field Inv/Central NC
Susan Dixon, Complaints Administrator
Planning a Relocation
or Move?
Please mail or fax your new
address and telephone number
to the Licensing Board (in-clude
your license number) at:
P.O. Box 17187
Raleigh, NC 27619
Fax: (919) 571-4703
2004 Homeowners Recovery Fund Report
2 Bulletin
Claimant Award General Contractor
Everhart $5,000 Cornerstone Residential Development Corp.
Adee $77,000 Oliver Wells/Wells Development, LLC
Norrell $4,250 A.L. Elks
Gronquist $2,000 Richard Marvin McClain, Jr.
Brown $9,000 Custom Dream Builders, Inc.
Prillaman $2,500 Brothers Custom Builders, Inc.
Kiiskila $6,655 Quantum Construction & Restoration, Inc.
Havner $77,000 Osborne Builders, Inc.
Wright-Ware $12,000 Aaron Yandel
Hobson $4,000 CRL Construction, Inc.
Debnam $3,000 Triangle Custom Builders, LLC
Darlington $50,000 Helmsman Construction, Inc.
Westmoreland $4,000 Beauchamp Construction Co.
Demetrious $70,000 Oliver Wells/Wells Development, LLC
Teeter $25,000 Blue River Builders
Bishop $5,000 Bill Buchanan Builder
Brewer $15,000 Castlebay Construction, Inc.
Aronson $50,000 Brugh Properties, Inc.
CHILD LABOR LAWS INFORMATION FOR EMPLOYERS
The U.S. Labor Department’s Wage and Hour Division offers instructions and information to
employers who want to know more about child labor laws. Violation of any of existing child labor
provisions could result in the assessment of civil money penalties, which can be as high as
$11,000 per minor.
For more information, contact the Wage and Hour Division’s toll free number 1-866-487-9243,
or visit its website at www.wagehour.dol.gov.
Bulletin 3
More general contractors
are operating in North
Carolina (almost 31,000
licensed) in 2005 than in
previous years. And the Licensing
Board continues to receive increas-ing
numbers of reports, often in the
form of a formal complaint, alleging
unlawful use of a general contrac-tor’s
license by unlicensed persons
or firms. In many of these cases or
complaints, a licensed general con-tractor
has aided an unlicensed per-son
or business by effectively loan-ing
the license, or allowing the
license to be used in some manner
by the unlicensed entity.
The Board is empowered by law to
take legal or disciplinary action
against contractors found guilty of
charges such as sharing a general
contractor’s license with an unli-censed
person or firm. It’s also
important to note that there may be
consequences other than disci-plinary
action against the license for
violators of the licensing and disci-plinary
statutes; and the conse-quences
can be severe for those
caught.
A fundamental understanding of the
general contractor licensing laws
provides that general contractors
licenses are not transferable. The
Board’s licensing statutes (at
N.C.G.S. §87-1, et seq.) require that
individuals, sole proprietors, part-nerships,
corporations, etc. practic-ing
general contracting must first
possess a valid license. The statute
does not, however, authorize or
allow the holder of a sole propri-etorship
license, for example, to
allow a partnership, corporation or
another entity to use that license for
any reason. Perhaps the most com-mon
complaint received by the
Board in these circumstances
involves allegations where the hold-er
of an individual general contrac-tors
license allows an unlicensed
business or corporation to use or
“share” its license. This is clearly a
violation of the general contractor
licensing law. An argument could be
made that this arrangement is legal
or even justifiable as long as the
licensed individual is an employee
of the unlicensed contractor. Again,
licenses are not transferable.
What could happen to those found
to be in violation by unlawfully
allowing the use of a license by
another unlicensed entity? There
are certainly financial considerations
in such circumstances, and the
North Carolina Court of Appeals has
held (Hawkins v. Holland, Hollifield
v. Holland; 97 App. 291, 388 S.E. 2d
221, 1990, and Joe Newton v. Tull,
75 N.C. App. 325, 330 S.E. 2d 664
(1985) that an unlicensed contractor
may not recover for any amount due
under a contract costing $30,000 or
more, even if he or she is associated
in partnership or employed by the
licensee. In Hawkins v. Holland, the
unlicensed contractor contended
that he was working in a partner-ship
with a licensed general con-tractor,
who said he had allowed
Holland to use his license only to
obtain building permits for the
homes in question. The Court held
in this case that the defendant unli-censed
contractor’s claims for recov-ery
were unenforceable because the
plaintiff’s contracts were with the
unlicensed individual, and not a
licensed general contractor.
Violators of the licensing laws, or
those who loan their licenses, may
be disciplined by the Licensing
Board for General Contractors for
allowing the use of their license by
unlicensed persons or other entities.
Appropriate sanctions for miscon-duct
in such cases may include sus-pension
or in many cases revocation
of license. From 2001 through
2003, the Licensing Board suspend-ed
or revoked 19 licenses in related
cases of unlawful use of licensure
complaints, or where contractors
illegally allowed the use of their
general contractors license. Forty
Consent Orders were entered during
that time, effectively resolving mat-ters
involving unlawful use of
license. The Board may also deny or
delay issuance of a license to a new
applicant if the Board determines
that the applicant used another’s
license and unlawfully engaged in
the practice of general contracting
prior to filing the application.
Contractors should immediately
cease any arrangement whereby an
unlicensed person, partnership or
corporation is allowed to use a
licensed general contractor’s license
with the licensee’s permission.
Although as a licensed general con-tractor,
you may have an ownership
interest in the unlicensed entity, the
unlicensed contractor may not use
your license for any reason. Unli-censed
contractors may not circum-vent
State law and licensing require-ments
by hiring an employee who is
a licensee. Unlicensed contractors
who wish to practice general con-tracting
should file a new applica-tion
under the contractor’s exact
legal name. For further information
about filing applications or licens-ing,
see the Board’s publication,
���Laws and Regulations Applicable to
General Contracting in the State of
North Carolina.” This publication is
available by visiting the Board’s web
site (nclbgc.org), or request a copy
by calling the Board office at (919)
571-4183.
Loaning, Sharing Your General Contractors License—
Not A Good Idea
DISCIPLINARY ACTION, LEGAL CONSEQUENCES MAY BEFALL VIOLATORS
4 Bulletin
continued from page 1
(4) Provide to the Board an audited
financial statement with a classified
balance sheet as part of the ap-plication,
if the applicant or any
owner, principal, or qualifier is in
bankruptcy.
(b) Intermediate License. The applicant
for such a license must:
(1) Be entitled to be admitted to the
examination given by the Board in
light of the requirements set out in
G.S. 87-10 and Section .0400 of this
Chapter;
(2) Be financially stable to the extent that
the total current assets of the appli-cant
or the firm or corporation he
represents exceed the total current
liabilities by at least seventy-five thou-sand
dollars ($75,000.00) as reflected
in an audited financial statement pre-pared
by a certified public accountant
or an independent accountant who is
engaged in the public practice of
accountancy; and
(3) Successfully complete 70 percent of
the examination given the applicant
by the Board dealing with the speci-fied
contracting classification chosen
by the applicant.
(c) Unlimited License. The applicant for
such a license must:
(1) Be entitled to be admitted to the
examination given by the Board in
light of the requirements set out in
G.S. 87-10 and Section .0400 of this
Chapter;
(2) Be financially stable to the extent
that the total current assets of the
applicant or the firm or corporation
he represents exceed the total
current liabilities by at least one
hundred fifty thousand dollars
($150,000.00) as reflected in an
audited financial statement pre-pared
by a certified public accoun-tant
or an independent accountant
who is engaged in the public prac-tice
of accountancy;
(3) Successfully complete 70 percent of
the examination given the applicant
by the Board dealing with the speci-fied
contracting classification chosen
by the applicant.
SECTION .0900 — HOME-OWNERS
RECOVERY FUND
21 NCAC 12.0903 Application for
Payment
(a) Applicants desiring to obtain payment
from the fund shall file a verified applica-tion
with the Board on a prescribed form.
The form shall require information con-cerning
the applicant and the claim includ-ing,
but not limited to, the applicant’s
name and address, the amount of the
claim, a description of the acts of the gen-eral
contractor which constitute the
grounds for the claim and a statement that
all court proceedings are concluded or the
general contractor has filed for bankruptcy.
If the applicant has exhausted all civil
remedies pursuant to G.S. 87-15.8(3), the
application shall include certified copies
from the civil action of the complaint,
judgment and return of execution marked
as unsatisfied. If the general contractor was
a corporation which was dissolved no later
than one year after the date of discovery
by the applicant of the facts constituting
the dishonest or incompetent conduct, and
the applicant did not commence a civil
action against the general contractor, then
the applicant shall include certified copies
of documents evidencing the dissolution. If
the applicant has been precluded from fil-ing
suit, obtaining a judgment or otherwise
proceeding due to the bankruptcy of the
general contractor, then the applicant shall
submit a certified copy of the bankruptcy
petition and any proof of claim, and docu-ments
from the bankruptcy court or
trustee certifying that the applicant has not
and will not receive any payment from the
bankruptcy proceeding. If the applicant is
claiming against the estate of a deceased
general contractor, then the applicant shall
submit a statement from the administrator
of the estate certifying that the applicant
has not and will not receive any payment
from the estate.
New Rules Become Effective In March 2005
Licensing Examinations Now Administered
Through PSI Examination Services
The Licensing Board has contracted with PSI Examination Services to
administer its computer-based licensing tests effective March 1, 2004.
The Board’s licensing examinations are now delivered by PSI at seven
North Carolina test centers and over 72 centers in other states. PSI
utilizes a web-based interface allowing its clients to quickly download
score reports providing access to candidate test information in a
secure environment. Candidates eligible for contractor licensing
exams may schedule tests either by telephone or the internet. PSI
offers touch-tone phone registration service without operator assis-tance
and online scheduling 24/7 (Candidates requesting examination
accommodations outside North Carolina must make their request by
telephone). Headquartered in Glendale, California, PSI provides test
development, test administration and other services for licensing
examinations in the U.S. and Canada.
Bulletin 5
DEFINITIONS
Consent Order: An order of
the Board resulting from an
agreement between the Board
and a licensee regarding the
revocation or suspension of the
license to practice general con-tracting,
or the conditions, limi-tations
or restrictions placed on
that license. This is a method of
resolving or settling disciplinary
or contested cases in lieu of a
disciplinary hearing.
Revocation: A Board action,
which permanently terminates
a license by effectively with-drawing
that license to practice
general contracting.
Suspension: A Board action,
which inactivates a license to
practice general contracting for
a set period of time.
Dismissal/Voluntary
Dismissal: A Board action
dismissing a contested case,
resulting in no disciplinary
action against the licensee or
Respondent.
Voluntary Surrender: A
licensee’s relinquishing or ten-dering
of the license to practice
general contracting, pending an
investigation or other action by
the Board.
Admission of Violation: A
document signed by a licensee
who admits to the stated viola-tions,
agrees not to repeat
them, but acknowledges that
the Board will use the docu-ment
against the licensee pro-spectively
should such action
become necessary.
Injunction: A Superior Court
order entered against an unli-censed
contractor who is ille-gally
practicing general con-tracting.
Such an order stops
the illegal practice and can be
obtained by consent of a coop-erating
contractor or by default
judgment; violation of the in-junction
is contempt of court.
Code: Provisions of the North
Carolina State Building Code
(Residential/Vol. VII and pre-vious
editions; General Con-struction/
Vol. I).
Disciplinary Action
Final Decisions
Mayhew Construction Corp.
(Buncombe County; 03C254)
License No. 6408. A disciplinary
hearing was conducted on
August 11, 2004 and the Final
Decision entered August 18,
2004. At hearing, evidence was
presented showing that in 1995
Mayhew constructed a single-family
dwelling in Buncombe
County, and in 2003 the owner
of the residence at the time filed
a complaint with the Board
alleging that Mayhew had violat-ed
the NC State Building Code
during construction. The Board
found that Mayhew is competent
to practice general contracting,
exercised reasonable care in the
construction of the residence
and found no evidence of any
misconduct by Mayhew in con-nection
with the residence
referred to in the complaint. The
Board dismissed all charges
against License No. 6408.
Messineo Builders, LLC and
Qualifier, Lawrence Patrick
Gibbons (Brunswick County;
03C150 and 03C274) License
No. 41955. A disciplinary hear-ing
was conducted on August 11,
2004 and the Final Decision
entered August 18, 2004.
Testimony and exhibits showed
that license renewal applications
for 2001, 2002 and 2003 listed
Lawrence Patrick Gibbons as
qualifier and responsible manag-ing
employee of the corporation.
Mr. Gibbons also signed applica-tions
and renewals certifying
that as responsible managing
employee, he was the person
who successfully completed an
examination for Messineo
Builders, LLC (Messineo) and
was actively engaged in its work
a minimum of 20 hours per
week. The Board found that Mr.
Gibbons was not a responsible
managing member of Messineo,
but was instead a casual assistant
with few if any real managerial
responsibilities. The Board also
found that both Messineo and
Mr. Gibbons misrepresented his
qualifier’s status on renewal
applications for 2001-2003.
Messineo was reprimanded for
its misconduct; and the right and
ability of Mr. Gibbons to act as a
qualifying party for a license was
suspended for 90 days effective
as of January 1, 2005.
RTJ Contracting, Inc. (Harnett
County; 03C256) License No.
25704. A disciplinary hearing
was conducted on September 8,
2004 and the Final Decision
entered September 15, 2004.
Testimony and exhibits at hear-ing
showed in 2003, RTJ
obtained building permits for the
construction of two single-family
dwellings in Harnett County, but
did not act as general contractor
on the projects. The Board
found these actions by RTJ to
constitute misconduct and a will-ful
violation of Article 1, Chapter
87 of the NC General Statutes.
The Board revoked License No.
25704, but stayed the revocation
for a limited period solely to
allow RTJ to complete unfin-ished
projects under contract as
of the date of the Final Decision.
The Board was to be informed
within 10 days of any ongoing
projects, with documentation, as
well as an estimated completion
date for the projects. RTJ may
not contract for or undertake
any new work where the cost of
the undertaking is $30,000 or
more. The Board permanently
enjoined the unlicensed contrac-tor
in February 2004.
Sovereign Homes/Con-struction,
LLC (Wake County;
03C182) License No. 46236. A
disciplinary hearing was con-ducted
on September 8, 2004
and the Final Decision entered
September 15, 2004. At hearing,
testimony and exhibits presented
showed that Sovereign
Homes/Construction, LLC
(Sovereign) had a then currently
invalid license because they did
not have a qualifier. In addition
Sovereign had submitted a
renewal application to the Board
with a forged signature of the
former qualifier. The Board
found the actions of Sovereign to
constitute fraud and deceit in
obtaining a license, misconduct
and a willful violation of Article
1, Chapter 87 of the NC General
Statutes. The Board revoked
License No. 46236.
Bobby Hoffman Builders, Inc.
and Qualifier, Robert Thomas
Hoffman, Jr. (Wake County;
03C84) License No. 40628. A
disciplinary hearing was con-ducted
and the Final Decision
entered September 15, 2004.
Testimony and exhibits at hear-ing
showed that Bobby Hoffman
Builders, Inc. (Hoffman
Builders) had submitted a con-tractor
change form to the City
of Raleigh advising the City that
Hoffman Builders was the new
general contractor on a project
which had formerly been in the
name of an unlicensed entity.
The change form was signed by
Mr. Hoffman; but in fact,
Hoffman Builders did not act as
the general contractor for the
construction project. The Board
found the actions of Hoffman
Builders directly attributable to
its qualifier, Mr. Hoffman, which
constituted misconduct and a
willful violation of Article 1,
Chapter 87 of the NC General
Statutes. The Board revoked
License No. 40628, as well as
Mr. Hoffman’s ability to qualify a
license to practice general con-tracting.
The Board had perma-nently
enjoined the unlicensed
entity in December 2003.
G. Craven Gardner, II and
Garry Craven Gardner, II,
Qualifier (Wake County;
03C266) License No. 23740. A
disciplinary hearing was conduct-ed
on September 8, 2004 and the
Final Decision entered Septem-ber
15, 2004. Testimony and
exhibits at hearing showed that
Mr. Gardner was president of an
unlicensed corporation which
(The following Board Orders and other Board disciplinary actions reported here are not a complete summary of all
activity or a full representation of each case. Every effort is made for accuracy, but such is not guaranteed. Questions or
requests for additional information about specific cases should be referred to the Board’s Legal Section.)
6 Bulletin
had entered into a construction
contract to construct
a single-family dwelling for
the amount of $742,000. Mr.
Gardner constructed the home,
but on behalf of the unlicensed
corporation. The Board found
the actions of Mr. Gardner to
constitute misconduct and a
willful violation of Article 1,
Chapter 87 of the NC General
Statutes. The Board revoked
both License No. 23740 and Mr.
Gardner’s ability to qualify a
license to practice general con-tracting.
The unlicensed corpo-ration
had already been perma-nently
enjoined in March 2003.
Frederick G. Norvell and
Qualifier, Frederick G.
Norvell (Mecklenburg County;
02C452) License No. 36461. A
disciplinary hearing was con-ducted
on September 8, 2004
and the Final Decision entered
September 15, 2004. Testimony
and evidence presented at hear-ing
showed that an unlicensed
entity had entered into a con-tract
to perform construction
and remodeling on a single-family
dwelling in Mecklenburg
County for an estimated cost
of $74,030. The contract was
signed by Mr. Norvell as “Build-er”
and listed License No.
36461 below his signature.
During construction Mr. Norvell
deviated from the engineered
drawings without approval, but
the homeowners did not allow
him the opportunity to remedy
any of the deficiencies. The
Board found that the actions of
Mr. Norvell constituted miscon-duct
and a willful violation of
Article 1, Chapter 87 of the NC
General Statutes and ordered
License No. 36461 and Mr.
Norvell’s ability to qualify a
license to practice general con-tracting
to be suspended for six
months, such suspensions being
stayed.
James Thomas Hudson and
James Thomas Hudson as
Qualifier (Sampson County;
03C219) License No. 13642.
The Board conducted a disci-plinary
hearing on November
10, 2004 and the Final Decision
entered November 18, 2004. At
hearing testimony and exhibits
were presented that showed Mr.
Hudson had authorized an unli-censed
individual by means of a
notarized statement to obtain
building permits on his behalf
under License No. 13642. On
two separate occasions the unli-censed
individual had obtained
building permits in New Han-over
County for repairs to the
same single-family dwelling at
estimated costs of $25,000 and
$82,269.90, listing Mr. Hudson
as the contractor. The unli-censed
individual supervised the
construction project and han-dled
all of the business affairs
for his own construction busi-ness,
but Mr. Hudson was not
actively engaged in the unli-censed
individual’s construction
project and was not the general
contractor for the project. The
Board found the actions of Mr.
Hudson constituted misconduct
and a willful violation of Article
1, Chapter 87 of the NC General
Statutes and revoked both Li-cense
No. 13642 and Mr.
Hudson’s ability to qualify a
license to practice general con-tracting.
The Board had perma-nently
enjoined the unlicensed
individual and his company in
August 2004.
Pierce Construction Inc. and
Ronald L. Pierce (Mecklenburg
County; 03C400) License No.
46974. A disciplinary hearing
was conducted on November 10,
2004 and the Final Decision en-tered
November 18, 2004. Testi-mony
and evidence showed that
the license of Pierce Construc-tion
Inc. (Pierce Construction)
had not been renewed for 2004,
was invalid and in 2003 Pierce
Construction had contracted to
construct an addition to a home
in Mecklenburg County for
$48,000, while listing the esti-mated
cost on the building per-mit
as $40,000. Pierce Con-struction
failed to obtain
framing and electrical inspec-tions,
and two building code
violations were found. The
Board found the actions of
Pierce Construction constituted
gross negligence, incompetency
and misconduct; and the actions
of Mr. Pierce as qualifier consti-tuted
gross negligence, incom-petency
and misconduct. The
Board ordered License No.
46974 and Mr. Pierce’s exam
credentials to be suspended for
one year and thereafter unless
and until Mr. Pierce presents to
the Board evidence that he has
taken and passed a Level I
Building Code course.
Revocations or
Surrenders of
License
Dean D. Latour (Catawba
County; 04C131 and 04C296)
License No. 45849. On August
23, 2004 Dean D. Latour sur-rendered
his general contractors
license to the Board. The Board
considers surrender of license as
permanent revocation.
Touchstone Carolina, LLC
(Forsyth County; 04C306)
License No. 50877. On August
23, 2004, Steven V. Toth surren-dered
the corporate license to
the Board. The Board considers
surrender of license as perma-nent
revocation.
Brookshire Construction Co.,
Inc. (Mecklenburg County;
04C112) License No. 38671. On
September 13, 2004 Jacob J.
Palillo surrendered the corpo-rate
license to the Board. The
Board considers surrender of
license as permanent revocation.
Donald Ray Corum (Rocking-ham
County; 03C395, 03C444,
04C13 and 04C247) License No.
48030. On November 11, 2004
Donald Ray Corum surrendered
his general contractors license
to the Board. The Board consid-ers
surrender of license as per-manent
revocation.
Gilbert Chriscoe (Randolph
County; 02C285) License No.
13541. On January 21, 2005
Gilbert Chriscoe surrendered his
general contractors license to
the Board. The Board considers
surrender of license as perma-nent
revocation.
Mark Howard (Iredell County;
03C347) License No. 46454. On
January 27, 2005 Mark Howard
surrendered his general contrac-tors
license to the Board. The
Board considers surrender of
license as permanent revocation.
Capps & Associates, Inc.
(Wake County; 04C325, 04C359
and 04C388) License No.
49286. On February 10, 2005
James Robert Capps voluntarily
surrendered the corporate
license to the Board. The Board
considers surrender of license as
permanent revocation.
Consent Order
(Licensees)
Peer Beveridge t/a Beveridge
Construction, and Qualifier,
Peer J. Beveridge (Wake
County; 03C201) License No.
38270. On August 9, 2004 the
Board filed Consent Orders in
which Peer Beveridge t/a
Beveridge Construction, and
Peer J. Beveridge, as Qualifier
agreed to a one-year suspension
of license and exam credentials
(during which time the license
must be active), conditionally
restored following a six-month
active suspension. Mr. Beveridge
also agreed to restrictions of
submitting a list with estimated
dates of completion plus sup-porting
documentation for each
currently-unfinished project in
which the cost of the undertak-ing
is $30,000 or more. During
the six-month active suspension,
Mr. Beveridge shall not serve as
a qualifier as defined in G.S.
§ 87-10. A Consent Order viola-tion
would cause the provisional
restoration of License No. 38270
to be rescinded and require its
surrender to the Board for six
additional months. In signing
the Consent Order, Mr.
Beveridge agreed to allegations
of doing business as an unli-censed
LLC in the construction
of a garage for a total amount of
$34,800, building with two
building code violations and
failing to notify the Board of a
bankruptcy filing within 30 days
as required by law. The Board
obtained a permanent injunc-tion
against the unlicensed LLC
in February 2004.
Bob Burns Construction, Inc.
(Currituck County; 03C189)
License No. 35838. The Board
entered into a Consent Order on
August 25, 2004 in which Bob
Burns Construction, Inc. agreed
Bulletin 7
to a six-month suspension of li-cense,
conditionally restored for
12 months, but restricted to tak-ing
and passing a Level I Build-ing
Code course and a Law and
Administration course and sub-mitting
written proof of satisfac-tory
completion of both to the
Board. A Consent Order viola-tion
would require a six-month
surrender of license to the
Board. The Board contends and
Mr. Burns denies that he violat-ed
12 sections of the NC State
Building Code, Volume VII,
1996 Edition in the construc-tion
of a single-family dwelling
built at a contract price of
$87,720.
Joey Shore and Joey Shore,
Qualifier (Cherokee County;
03C392) License No. 44822. On
November 2, 2004 the Board
entered into a Consent Order in
which Mr. Shore agreed to a six-month
suspension of license and
exam credentials, conditionally
restored following a 60-day
active suspension, but restricted
to submitting a list with sup-porting
documentation of cur-rent
unfinished projects and
undertaking no new projects
costing $30,000 during the 60-
days of active suspension, sched-uled
to begin on the day follow-ing
the last estimated date of
completion. A violation of the
Consent Order would require a
six-month surrender of license
to the Board. Mr. Shore further
agreed to allegations that he ap-plied
for and obtained a build-ing
permit for the construction
of a residential dwelling for an
estimated cost of $127,000, but
in reality the homeowners had
contracted with an unlicensed
entity at a cost of $123,907; and
that during construction of the
residence Mr. Shore may have
acted as construction manager,
but not as the general contrac-tor.
The above violations consti-tute
misconduct in the practice
of general contracting and a
willful violation of of G.S.
§ 87-11(a). The Board obtained
a permanent injunction against
the unlicensed entity in July
2004.
Larry Rogers Construction
Co., Inc. and Mark Edward
Rogers & David Larry Rogers,
Qualifiers (Moore County;
03C364, 03C366 and 03C368)
License No. 330869. On No-vember
15, 2004 a Consent
Order was filed in which all par-ties
agreed to a six-month sus-pension
of license and exam
credentials of both qualifiers,
conditionally restored following
a 60-day active suspension of
license and exam credentials to
begin on December 1, 2004, but
restricted to submitting a list
with supporting documentation
of current unfinished projects
and undertaking no new proj-ects
in excess of $30,000 or
qualifying any new projects dur-ing
the active suspension. A
Consent Order violation would
require a six-month surrender
of license and exam credentials
to the Board. David Larry
Rogers further agreed to allega-tions
that on three separate oc-casions
he had obtained build-ing
permits in Macon County for
the construction of residences
on which he acted as construc-tion
manager, but not general
contractor. The above violations
constitute misconduct in the
practice of general contracting
and a willful violation of G.S.
§ 87-11(a).
John William Pinkston, II
and Qualifier, John William
Pinkston, II (Buncombe County;
03C403) License No. 50572. The
Board entered into a Consent
Order on December 8, 2004 in
which Mr. Pinkston agreed to a
suspension of his license and
exam credentials until February
19, 2006, or until he is no
longer on probation in Bun-combe
County, whichever is
sooner. Throughout the duration
of his probation Mr. Pinkston
shall not practice general con-tracting
as defined in G.S.
§ 87-1. Mr. Pinkston further
agreed to allegations that he was
the president, registered agent
and qualifier for a corporate
contracting company which sub-mitted
two proposals for the de-sign
and construction of a medi-cal
office at a price of $249,850,
neither of which were accepted,
and further that in 2003 he sub-mitted
an application for pay-ment
of services rendered,
including an invoice from an
engineer where the cost reflect-ed
a greatly inflated amount due
over what the engineer had ori-ginally
billed Mr. Pinkston. Ad-ditionally
Mr. Pinkston agreed
that on his 2004 renewal with
the Board he had failed to dis-close
he was under investigation
or engaged in any controversy
with this Board or any other
regulatory agency. The above
violations are directly attribu-table
to the qualifier and consti-tute
misconduct in the practice
of general contracting and a
willful violation of G.S. §§ 87-
11(a) and 87-13 and constitute
fraud or deceit in obtaining a
license.
Gary Edward Moore and Gary
Edward Moore, Qualifier
(Watauga County; 03C427 and
03C457) License No. 21963. On
December 9, 2004 a Consent
Order was filed in which Mr.
Moore agreed to an 18-month
suspension of license and exam
credentials, conditionally re-stored
following a six-month
active suspension, but restricted
to submitting a list with sup-porting
documentation of cur-rent
unfinished projects and
undertaking no new projects
costing $30,000 during the six-months
of active suspension,
scheduled to begin on the day
following the last estimated date
of completion. A violation of the
Consent Order would require an
18-month surrender of license
to the Board. Mr. Moore further
agreed to allegations that in
2001 he contracted in the name
of “Moore Construction Com-pany”
and obtained a building
permit in Watauga County for
construction of a residential
dwelling with an estimated cost
of $455,928 using License No.
21963 at a time when he was
only entitled to act as a general
contractor for single projects
valued of up to $350,000.
Further he agreed that in 1995
he contracted for the construc-tion
of a $125,000 single-family
dwelling in the name of “Moore
Construction Co.,” an unli-censed
entity, and then submit-ted
a building permit applica-tion
to Caldwell County for the
same residence with “Gary E.
Moore Const. Co.” as the con-tractor,
but using License No.
21963. The above violations
constitute misconduct in the
practice of general contracting
and a willful violation of G.S.
§ 87-11(a). The Board obtained
a permanent injunction against
the unlicensed entity in
February 2004.
S.J. McMillan Builders, Inc.
and Scott J. McMillan, as
Qualifier (Carteret County;
01C337) License No. 27294. The
Board entered into a Consent
Order on December 17, 2004
in which Scott J. McMillan,
President, on behalf of the cor-poration,
agreed to a nine-month
suspension of license,
immediately conditionally
restored for 15 months provided
that by December 17, 2005 he
submits written proof of satisfac-tory
completion of a Level I
Building Code course offered by
the NC Department of Insurance
dealing with the provisions of
Volume VII of the NC State
Building Code. A Consent Order
violation would require a nine-month
surrender of license to
the Board. Further Mr. McMillan
agreed that S.J. McMillan
Builders, Inc. entered into a
contract for the construction of a
residence at a price of $441,000
and obtained a building permit
for the construction which was
found to have seven building
code violations. The above viola-tions
constitute gross negligence,
incompetency and misconduct in
the practice of general contract-ing
and a willful violation of of
G.S. § 87-11(a) and are directly
attributable to Scott J. McMillan
as qualifier and constitute gross
negligence, incompetency and
misconduct in the practice of
general contracting in violation
of G.S. § 87-11(a).
The Bentley Company, Inc.
and John D. Bentley, Quali-fier
(Mecklenburg County;
03C356) License No. 40747. On
February 4, 2005 a Consent
Order was entered in which
John D. Bentley, in behalf of
The Bentley Company, Inc. and
himself as Qualifier, agreed to a
six-month suspension of license
and exam credentials, con-ditionally
restored for 15
months, but restricted to sub-mitting
a list with supporting
documentation of current
8 Bulletin
unfinished projects and un-dertaking
no new projects in
excess of $30,000 for 60 days.
A violation of the Consent
Order would require a six-month
surrender of license and
exam credentials to the Board.
Mr. Bentley further agreed to
allegations of two violations of
the NC Residential Building
Code, Vol. VII, 1997 in the con-struction
of the single-family
dwelling in Union County. The
above violations constitute
gross negligence, incompetence
and/or misconduct in the prac-tice
of general contracting in
violation of G.S. § 87-11(a).
Richard H. Cohn and Richard
H. Cohn, as Qualifier (South
Carolina; 04C01) License No.
49131. A Consent Order was
filed on February 10, 2005 in
which Richard H. Cohn and
Richard H. Cohn, as Qualifier,
agreed to an 18-month suspen-sion
of license and exam creden-tials,
conditionally restored fol-lowing
a six-month active
suspension, but restricted to sub-mitting
a list with supporting
documentation of current un-finished
projects and undertak-ing
no new projects in excess of
$30,000 or qualifying any new
projects during the six months of
active suspension, scheduled to
begin on the day following the
last estimated date of completion
of current unfinished projects. A
violation of the Consent Order
would require an 18-month sur-render
of license and exam cre-dentials
to the Board. Mr. Cohn
further agreed to allegations that
on his 2004 renewal application
to the Board he failed to disclose
he was under investigation or
engaged in any controversy with
this Board or any other regula-tory
agency in that he was per-sonally
involved in a lawsuit
filed against him in Cumberland
County where he had contracted
as an unlicensed entity and then
misrepresented on the building
permit application the cost as
compared to the contract price.
Findings include a building code
violation with an inadequate
footing to support the weight of
the exterior wall. The above vio-lations
constitute fraud or deceit
in obtaining a license, gross neg-ligence,
incompetency, miscon-duct
in the practice of general
contracting and/or a willful vio-lation
of G.S. §§ 87-1, 87-10, 87-
11(a) and 87-13.
Donald E. Gray, Jr. and
Eonald Eugene Gray, Jr., as
Qualifier (Wake County;
03C378) License No. 53564. On
February 10, 2005 the Board
entered into a Consent Order in
which Mr. Gray agreed to a 12-
month suspension of license and
exam credentials, conditionally
restored following a six-month
active suspension, but restricted
to submitting a list with support-ing
documentation of current
unfinished projects and under-taking
no new projects in excess
of $30,000 or qualifying any
new projects during the 6-month
active suspension, scheduled to
begin on the day following his
last estimated day of completion
of currently ongoing projects.
Mr. Gray further agreed that
during the 12 month period
commencing on March 9, 2005
he would successfully complete
a Law and Administration course
offered by the NC Code Officials
Qualification Board through the
NC Department of Insurance
and submit written proof to the
Board of satisfactory completion.
A violation of this Consent Order
would require a 12-month sur-render
of license to the Board.
Mr. Gray also agreed to allega-tions
that prior to becoming
licensed by the Board he sub-mitted
a proposal for the remod-eling
of a commercial facility,
and entered into a contract all
while unlicensed. The above vio-lations
constitute misconduct in
the practice of general contract-ing
and a willful violation of G.S.
§ 87-11(a). The Board obtained
a permanent injunction against
the unlicensed entity in January
2002.
Darrell J. McAuly and Darrell
John McAuly, as Qualifier
(Cumberland County; 03C499)
License No. 32494. On February
10, 2005 a Consent Order was
filed Mr. McAuly 12-month sus-pension
of license and exam cre-dentials,
conditionally restored
following a six-month active sus-pension,
but restricted to sub-mitting
a list with supporting
documentation of current unfin-ished
projects and undertaking
no new projects in excess of
$30,000 or qualifying no new
projects during the six-month
active suspension, scheduled to
begin on the day following his
last estimated day of completion
of currently ongoing projects.
Mr. McAuly further agreed to
allegations that on his 2001 and
2002 renewal applications to the
Board he failed to disclose three
judgments entered against him
in Cumberland County in 2001
prior to completing his renewal
application; that on his 2002 re-newal
application he failed to
disclose there had been a lawsuit
filed against him in Cumberland
County where an unlicensed
corporation of which he was
president had contracted to
build a single-family dwelling
for $98,600. The above viola-tions
constitute fraud or deceit
in obtaining a license, miscon-duct
in the practice of general
contracting and a willful viola-tion
of G.S. §§ 87-1, 87-11(a)
and 87-13.
Admissions of
Violation
(Licensees)
Gibson Technical Services,
Inc. (Georgia; 03C129) License
No. 53163. On September 24,
2004 an Admission of Violation
was entered in which Gibson
Technical Services, Inc. admit-ted
entering into a contract in
2003 to provide construction
and installation services for a
communications system in three
areas of North Carolina for a
total cost of $766,485. As of the
date of the contract, Gibson
Technical Services, Inc. held a
limited PU (communications)
license and was only entitled to
act as general contractor for sin-gle
projects with a value of up
to $350,000.
Norstate Contracting, Inc.
(Martin County; 02C445)
License No. 46409. An Admis-sion
of Violation was entered on
October 4, 2004 in which
Norstate Contracting, Inc.
(Norstate) admitted allowing its
license number to be used on a
Pitt County building permit
application completed by a rep-resentative
of an unlicensed cor-poration.
Norstate violated
eleven sections of the NC
Residential Building Code, Vol.
VII, 1997 with 1998/1999
Revisions, in the construction of
a single-family dwelling.
Robert S. Devitt, Jr. (Watauga
County; 03C370) License No.
42253. On October 6, 2004 an
Admission of Violation was
entered in which Mr. Devitt
admitted obtaining a building
permit for the 2003 construc-tion
of a single-family dwelling.
During construction, Mr. Devitt
was licensed as an individual,
but conducted business as an
unlicensed corporation which
was only entitled to act as a
general contractor for single
projects valued at less than
$30,000.
Frederick L. McIlvain (Alex-ander
County; 03C440) License
No. 38265. An Admission of
Violation was entered on
October 8, 2004 in which Mr.
McIlvain admitted violating six
sections of the NC Residential
Building Code, Vol. VII, 2002 in
the construction of a single-fam-ily
modular dwelling in Alex-ander
County, NC. Although Mr.
McIlvain indicated that he was
willing to remedy the violations,
the homeowners will not allow
him to return.
Stephen Weil (Duplin County;
04C96) License No. 43576. On
November 2, 2004 an Admission
of Violation was entered in
which Mr. Weil, who is licensed
as an individual, admitted vio-lating
NCGS § 87-11 by acting
as a principal in an unlicensed
corporation which engaged in
the practice of general contract-ing.
In that capacity, Mr. Weil
signed a 2003 building permit
application for the construction
of a single-family dwelling in
Duplin County using his indi-vidual
license number, but listed
the name of the unlicensed cor-poration.
The corporation later
contracted to sell the same
home, but Mr. Weil signed the
contract as “seller.” Also in
2003, the unlicensed corpora-
Bulletin 9
tion submitted a proposal to
perform repair work on apart-ments
in Rocky Mount, but the
proposal was submitted by
Stephen Weil.
Ebrahim Safaie Mowlavi t/a
Persis-Nova Construction Co.
(Mecklenburg County; 03C181)
License No. 20291. An Ad-mission
of Violation was entered
on December 22, 2004 in which
Ebrahim Safaie Mowlavi t/a
Persis-Nova Construction Co.
admitted violating two sections
of the NC Residential Building
Code, Vol. VII, 1997 in the
construction of a single-family
dwelling in Mecklenburg
County. The two violations have
since been repaired by Ebrahim
Safaie Mowlavi t/a Persis-Nova
Construction Co.
Jamie Allen Andrews (New
Hanover County; 02C372,
03C104 and 03C169) License
No. 40761. On February 2, 2005
an Admission of Violation was
entered in which Mr. Andrews
admitted: 1. violating three sec-tions
of the NC Residential
Building Code, Vol. VII, 1997
with 1998/1999 Revisions in
the construction of a single-family
dwelling in Pender
County; 2. obtaining a building
permit for the construction of a
new residence in Pender County
by using his individual license
number, but then violating
NCGS § 87-11 in that he acted
as a principal in an unlicensed
corporation which engaged in
the practice of general contract-ing
when he entered into a con-tract
for the same property as a
corporation and violated four
sections of the NC Residential
Building Code, Vol. VII, 1997
with 1998/1999 Revisions in its
construction; and, 3. once again
obtaining a building permit for
the construction of a new resi-dence
in New Hanover County
by using his individual license
number, but then violating
NCGS § 87-11 in that he acted
as a principal in an unlicensed
corporation which engaged in
the practice of general contract-ing
when he entered into a con-tract
for the same property as a
corporation. Mr. Andrews fur-ther
admitted failing to reveal
information to the Board on his
2001 and 2002 renewal applica-tions
concerning liens, lawsuits,
judgments, or lis pendens filed
against him not previously dis-closed
to the Board.
Unlicensed
Contractor
Cases—
Injunctions
Default Judgment: Permanent
Injunctions were obtained by entry of
a Default Judgment in Wake County
Superior Court against each of the
unlicensed contractors listed below
for practicing general contracting in
an amount of $30,000 or more, in
violation of N.C.G.S. § 87-13. In some
instances, the Sheriff was unable to
locate the contractors and/or Certi-fied
Mail was not delivered, but the
Board effected service either by
newspaper publication or through the
Secretary of State; nevertheless, the
contractors were enjoined from fur-ther
practice of general contracting
(including bidding) in an amount of
$30,000 or more until such time as
the person or firm becomes licensed
by the Board.
David Beasley d/b/a Com-mercial
Renovation Services,
Inc. (Franklin County; 03C306).
David Beasley d/b/a Commer-cial
Renovation Services, Inc.
contracted to renovate a base-ment
and construct an addition
to a home for a cost of $38,875.
Default Judgment was entered
July 1, 2004.
Steven J. Swaney d/b/a Hawk-eye
Construction (Cabarrus
County; 03C46). Steven J.
Swaney d/b/a Hawkeye Con-struction
contracted to construct
a home for a cost of $113,000
and thereafter undertook the
construction. Default Judgment
was entered July 1, 2004.
Richard Barnett (Virginia;
03C291). Mr. Barnett undertook
to supervise and manage the
repair of a fire damaged home
with an estimated cost of
$62,208. Default judgment was
entered July 2, 2004.
MacDonald Builders, LLC
(Edgecombe County; 03C320).
MacDonald Builders, LLC sub-mitted
a proposal to construct a
house for the price of $96,400
and later submitted a proposal
to complete fire restoration and
reconstruction work on a resi-dence
for a cost of $73,000.
Default Judgment was entered
July 2, 2004.
Dick Wilbur d/b/a Equipment
Maintenance & Service (Cum-berland
County; 03C233). Dick
Wilbur d/b/a Equipment Main-tenance
& Service submitted a
proposal to renovate a building
for a cost of $36,496. Default
Judgment was entered July 2,
2004.
Kenneth Baker (Iredell County;
03C490). Mr. Baker contracted
to renovate a commercial build-ing
for a price of $99,500. De-fault
Judgment was entered
November 16, 2004.
D&B Contracting, Inc. and
Robert J. Watson (Wake
County; 03C478). D&B Con-tracting,
Inc. contracted to con-struct
an addition and remodel
a home for a price of $73,003
and thereafter undertook con-struction,
while Mr. Watson mis-represented
himself as a li-censed
general contractor.
Default Judgment was entered
against both defendants on
November 16, 2004.
Howard R. Parker d/b/a
Parkers General Construction
& Repair (Hertford County;
03C496). Howard R. Parker
d/b/a Parkers General Con-struction
& Repair submitted a
bid to repair a storm damaged
home for a price of $30,920; a
subsequent change order in-creased
the price to $34,260.
Default Judgment was entered
November 16, 2004.
Brickwood Contractors, Inc.
(Virginia; 03C280). Brickwood
Contractors, Inc. submitted a
bid to clean, repair and paint
two 300,000-gallon water tanks
for a price of $668,734. Default
Judgment was entered Novem-ber
17, 2004.
Evans Somata Group, LLC
(Georgia; 03C268). Evans
Somata Group, LLC contracted
to construct a commercial build-ing
for a price of $213,700 and
thereafter undertook the con-struction.
Default Judgment was
entered November 17, 2004.
Ron King d/b/a Ron King
Construction (Chatham
County; 03C353). Ron King
d/b/a Ron King Construction
contracted to construct an addi-tion
onto a home for a cost of
$43,500; a subsequent change
order increased the contract
price, and defendant was paid
$49,774. Default Judgment was
entered November 17, 2004.
Consent Orders of Unlicensed
Contractors: Permanent Injunctions
were obtained by entry of a Consent
Order in Wake County Superior Court
concerning each of the following un-licensed
contractors who practiced gen-eral
contracting in an amount of
$30,000 or more, in violation of
N.C.G.S. § 87-13, but who admitted to
their wrongdoing, paid court costs and
service fees and cooperated with the
Board in the matter.
Charles Manning d/b/a
Manning Homes (Pitt County;
02C427). Manning Homes and
Roger Manning were involved in
the contract phase of a Winter-ville,
NC single-family dwelling at
a construction price of $155,000.
Charles Manning (brother of
Roger) failed to name licensee
Roger W. Manning as the project
contractor. The parties agree and
stipulate that it was an uninten-tional
oversight and a permanent
injunction nevertheless was ob-tained
in Wake County Superior
Court by entry of a Consent Order
on June 29, 2004.
David L. Nelson (Dare County;
03C383). Mr. Nelson obtained a
building permit as owner/
builder from Currituck County to
construct a commercial building
for $89,000. Thereafter he
undertook construction and
leased a portion of the building
to another, unaware that his
actions violated North Carolina
law. A permanent injunction was
obtained in Wake County Supe-rior
Court by entry of a Consent
Order on June 29, 2004.
Deckscapes, Inc. (Mecklenburg
County; 03C380). Deckscapes,
Inc. entered into three contracts
to construct a sunroom, screen
porch and deck for a total price
of $64,774, unaware that its
actions violated North Carolina
law. A permanent injunction
was obtained in Wake County
10 Bulletin
Superior Court by entry of a
Consent Order on July 1, 2004.
Greenbriar Homes, Inc.
(Georgia; 03C393). Greenbriar
Homes, Inc. contracted to con-struct
a home in Clay County for
a price of $123,907. A permanent
injunction was obtained in Wake
County Superior Court by entry
of a Consent Order on July 1,
2004.
Michael Dana Gangi d/b/a Big
Dog’s Turf (Iredell County;
03C446). Mr. Gangi submitted an
“Open End Proposal” for the
renovation of a Mecklenburg
County home for a cost of
$124,270. A permanent injunc-tion
was obtained in Wake
County Superior Court by entry
of a Consent Order on July 20,
2004.
Wendy C. Price d/b/a Price
Right Home Improvements
(Pender County; 03C328). Wendy
C. Price d/b/a Price Right Home
Improvements contracted to con-struct
an addition to a home in
Pender County for a cost of
$40,000. A permanent injunction
was obtained in Wake County
Superior Court by entry of a
Consent Order on July 20, 2004.
American Home Repair
Services, Inc. (Wake County;
03C175). The Board contends that
American Home Repair Services,
Inc. (American Home Repair) bid
a project where the cost of con-struction
exceeded $30,000.
American Home Repair denies the
Board’s contention that it engaged
in the unauthorized practice of
general contracting; however,
American Home Repair chose to
resolve Board File No. 03C175
through the terms and conditions
of the Consent Order. A perma-nent
injunction was obtained in
Wake County Superior Court by
entry of a Consent Order on July
30, 2004.
Elcana Steven Coleman
(Georgia; 03C487). The Board
contends that Mr. Coleman un-dertook
construction where the
cost of construction exceeded
$30,000. Mr. Coleman disagrees
with the Board’s contention;
however, Mr. Coleman chose to
resolve Board File No. 03C487
pursuant to the terms and condi-tions
outlined in the Consent
Order. A permanent injunction
was obtained in Wake County
Superior Court by entry of a
Consent Order on July 30, 2004.
David Penny d/b/a 3 in 1
Construction (Pender County;
03C218). David Penny d/b/a 3 in
1 Construction submitted an
Estimate in the amount of
$151,040.35 to repair a fire dam-aged
home in New Hanover
County and thereafter undertook
work on the project. A perma-nent
injunction was obtained in
Wake County Superior Court by
entry of a Consent Order on
August 31, 2004.
Ronald W. Anderson (Cherokee
County; 03C354). Mr. Anderson
obtained a building permit in
Cherokee County in July 2002 to
construct a commercial building
for a convenience store at an esti-mated
cost of $70,000 and there-after
undertook construction. Less
than one year later in February
2003, Mr. Anderson listed the
property for sale or lease with a
realty company; in May 2003 Mr.
Anderson leased out a portion of
the building, unaware that his
action violated North Carolina law.
A permanent injunction was
obtained in Wake County Superior
Court by entry of a Consent Order
on August 31, 2004.
Clyde Keith Bumgarner, Jr.
(Lincoln County; 03C317). Mr.
Bumgarner assisted his niece and
her husband with the construction
of their Lincoln County home
where the cost of the home was
approximately $150,000. Mr.
Bumgarner was unaware that his
actions in coordinating subcon-tractors
could be considered the
practice of general contracting.
A permanent injunction was ob-tained
in Wake County Superior
Court by entry of a Consent Order
on August 31, 2004.
Johnnie Faulkner (Alamance
County; 03C436). Mr. Faulkner
contracted to renovate a home in
Orange County for a cost of
$68,300. A permanent injunction
was obtained in Wake County
Superior Court by entry of a
Consent Order on August 31,
2004.
Clay Hawkins (Gaston County;
03C407). Mr. Hawkins undertook
construction of an office/storage
building on property owned by
another where the cost of the proj-ect
exceeded $30,000, unaware
that his action violated North Car-olina
law. A permanent injunction
was obtained in Wake County Su-perior
Court by entry of a Consent
Order on August 31, 2004.
DJM Construction Co., Inc.
(Cumberland County; 03C237).
DJM Construction Co., Inc. con-tracted
to reconstruct a home in
Hoke County for a price of
$91,760, unaware that its actions
violated North Carolina law. A
permanent injunction was
obtained in Wake County
Superior Court by entry of a
Consent Order filed on
September 8, 2004.
Haywood Hughes, Hughes
Construction of North Carolina
LLC, and Ann C. Hughes d/b/a
Last Detail Lawn Care
(Johnston County; 03C479 and
03C480). Mr. Hughes and Ms.
Hughes undertook to superintend
and manage renovation of a barn
in Johnston County where the
cost of construction exceeded
$30,000, unaware that their
actions constituted the practice of
general contracting. Hughes
Construction of North Carolina
LLC had no part in the renova-tion
project. A permanent in-junction
was obtained in Wake
County Superior Court by entry
of a Consent Order against
Haywood Hughes and Ann C.
Hughes on September 8, 2004;
it was further ordered on Sep-tember
8, 2004 that the action
against Defendant Hughes Con-struction
of North Carolina, LLC
be dismissed.
River Front Development
Group (Buncombe County;
03C312, 04C22 and 04C23).
River Front Development Group
contracted with three homeown-ers
in Buncombe County to con-struct
a residential dwelling and
to set up two modular homes for
costs in excess of $30,000. A per-manent
injunction was obtained
in Wake County Superior Court
by entry of a Consent Order on
November 10, 2004.
Bobby Steele (Chatham County;
04C100). Mr. Steele obtained a
building permit in Chatham
County as owner/builder to con-struct
a personal residence for an
estimated cost of $60,000 and
undertook construction. Initially
he intended to occupy the home;
however, within two months and
before a Certificate of Occupancy
was issued, he had listed the
home for sale, unaware that his
actions violated North Carolina
law. A permanent injunction was
obtained in Wake County Supe-rior
Court by the entry of a Con-sent
Order on November 17, 2004.
Michael Nicolosi and Mark
Kabbes d/b/a Seakay Construc-tion
Corporation (Maryland;
04C151). Defendants submitted a
proposal to construct an addition
to a dialysis center for a cost of
$137,200, unaware that their
actions constituted the practice of
general contracting. A permanent
injunction was obtained in Wake
County Superior Court by entry
of a Consent Order on December
6, 2004.
Lionel F. Perreault (Virginia;
04C193). Mr. Perreault obtained
a building permit as owner/
builder in Brunswick County for
a personal residence for an esti-mated
cost of $81,715 and un-dertook
construction. Less than
five months later, he executed an
offer to purchase and contract for
the sale of the home, the Certi-ficate
of Occupancy was issued
one month later, and the sale
closed within a week. A perma-nent
injunction was obtained in
Wake County Superior Court by
entry of a Consent Order on
December 6, 2004.
R.B. Jones Investments, LLC
(Buncombe County; 04C199).
R.B. Jones Investments, LLC con-tracted
to construct a commercial
building for a cost of $64,583.21.
A permanent injunction was ob-tained
in Wake County Superior
Court by entry of a Consent
Order on December 6, 2004.
Roy Strickland (Scotland County;
04C83). Mr. Strickland contracted
to construct a home in Richmond
County for a cost of $169,500. A
permanent injunction was ob-tained
in Wake County Superior
Bulletin 11
Court by entry of a Consent Order
on December 6, 2004.
Todd Toney (Gaston County;
04C171). Mr. Toney undertook to
remodel a home at a cost of
$47,950, unaware that his actions
violated North Carolina law. A
permanent injunction was ob-tained
in Wake County Superior
Court by entry of a Consent Order
on December 6, 2004.
Westgate Development Corp.
(Brunswick County; 04C177).
Westgate Development Corp. con-tracted
to construct a home for a
cost of $291,000, unaware that its
actions violated North Carolina
law. A permanent injunction was
obtained in Wake County Superior
Court by entry of a Consent Order
on December 6, 2004.
John Edward Whidden, III (Wake
County; 04C165). Mr. Whidden
contracted to manage the con-struction
of two homes for
$50,000, unaware that his actions
violated North Carolina law. A
permanent injunction was ob-tained
in Wake County Superior
Court by entry of a Consent Order
on December 6, 2004.
John Drew Campbell, Jr. (Cabarrus
County; 04C103). Mr. Campbell
obtained a building permit as
owner/builder in Rowan County to
construct a personal residence and
thereafter undertook construction.
A Certificate of Occupancy was
issued less than four months later,
and due to personal financial rea-sons,
Mr. Campbell sold the home
for $92,000. A permanent injunc-tion
was obtained in Wake County
Superior Court by entry of a Con-sent
Order on December 21, 2004.
Kenneth Carroll d/b/a Giza
Stone (Alamance County;
04C146). Mr. Carroll undertook
a series of stonework projects in
Wake County for two individuals
and was paid a total of $35,950
over a seven-month period. A per-manent
injunction was obtained in
Wake County Superior Court by
entry of a Consent Order on
December 21, 2004.
Carl K. Jacobsen and Anne M.
Jacobsen (Maryland; 04C101). Mr.
Jacobsen and Ms. Jacobsen
obtained a building permit as
owner/builder to construct a per-sonal
residence in North Topsail
Beach for an estimated cost of
$160,000 and thereafter undertook
construction. A permanent injunc-tion
was obtained in Wake County
Superior Court by entry of a Con-sent
Order on December 21, 2004.
Al Quarry (Transylvania County;
04C107). Mr. Quarry contracted to
construct a pool and room addi-tion
to a home, undertook the
work and was paid $54,289.45. A
permanent injunction was ob-tained
in Wake County Superior
Court by entry of a Consent Order
on December 21, 2004.
Douglas R. Sexton d/b/a Sexton
Builders (Virginia; 04C265). Mr.
Sexton contracted to construct a
log home in Alamance County for
a cost of $121,932, undertook con-struction
and was paid $86,386.12
before abandoning the job. A per-manent
injunction was obtained in
Wake County Superior Court by
entry of a Consent Order on
December 21, 2004.
TGB Construction, Inc. (Clay
County; 04C72). The Board con-tends
that TGB Construction, Inc.
(TGB) contracted to construct a
home in Cherokee County for an
estimated cost of $225,000. TGB
denies that it acted as a general
contractor but wishes to resolve
Board File No. 04C72. A perma-nent
injunction was obtained in
Wake County Superior Court by
entry of a Consent Order on
December 22, 2003.
Michael J. Cummings
(Mecklenburg County; 04C183).
Mr. Cummings obtained a build-ing
permit as owner/builder to
construct an addition onto a
home for an estimated cost in
excess of $30,000. A permanent
injunction was obtained in Wake
County Superior Court by entry
of a Consent Order on January
12, 2005.
First Century Homes, LLC
(Guilford County; 04C228). First
Century Homes, LLC contracted to
construct a home for a price of
$240,000, unaware that its actions
violated North Carolina law. A
permanent injunction was ob-tained
in Wake County Superior
Court by entry of a Consent Order
on January 12, 2005.
Southridge Construction, Inc.
(Jackson County; 04C50). Within
five months in 2003 on four sepa-rate
occasions, Southridge Con-struction,
Inc. contracted to per-form
construction projects where
the cost of each project exceeded
$30,000, unaware that its actions
violated North Carolina law. A
permanent injunction was ob-tained
in Wake County Superior
Court by entry of a Consent Order
on January 12, 2005.
Charles Wright, Jr. (Person
County; 04C145). Mr. Wright con-tracted
to construct a home for a
cost of $274,495. A permanent in-junction
was obtained in Wake
County Superior Court by entry of
a Consent Order on January 12,
2005.
UGS, Inc. d/b/a Home Care
Cleaners (Pitt County; 04C77).
UGS, Inc. d/b/a Home Care
Cleaners contracted to repair a fire
damaged home for a cost of
$131,664.66, unaware that its
actions violated North Carolina
law. A permanent injunction was
obtained in Wake County Superior
Court by entry of a Consent Order
on January 24, 2005.
Designer Homes of Asheville,
Inc. (Florida; 04C142). Designer
Homes of Asheville, Inc. contract-ed
to construct a home for a cost
of $500,000. A permanent injunc-tion
was obtained in Wake County
Superior Court by entry of a
Consent Order on January 28,
2005.
Absolute Remodeling, Inc.
(Union County; 03C34). The
Board contends that Absolute
Remodeling, Inc. (Absolute) con-tracted
to renovate a home in
Mecklenburg County for a price in
excess of $30,000. Absolute denies
the allegation but was willing to
enter into the Consent Order. A
permanent injunction was ob-tained
in Wake County Superior
Court by entry of that Consent
Order on February 2, 2005.
Rick L. Hodges (Macon County;
03C363, 03C365 and 03C367).
Within a four-month period Mr.
Hodges undertook construction of
three “Spec” homes where the cost
of each home exceeded $250,000.
A permanent injunction was ob-tained
in Wake County Superior
Court by entry of a Consent Order
on February 2, 2005.
Don Kromel d/b/a Kromel
Construction (Wake County;
04C214). Mr. Kromel entered into
an unlicensed joint venture to con-struct
an addition to a home for a
price of $249,175, unaware that his
actions violated North Carolina
law. A permanent injunction was
obtained in Wake County Superior
Court by entry of a Consent Order
on February 2, 2005.
Oatmeal Raisin, LLC (Guilford
County; 04C56). The Board con-tends
that Oatmeal Raisin, LLC
(Oatmeal) undertook to superin-tend
or manage the construction
of four homes where the cost of
each exceeded $30,000. Oatmeal
denies that it engaged in the
unauthorized practice of general
contracting; however, it is willing
to enter into a Consent Order in
order to conclude the litigation of
Board File No. 04C56. A perma-nent
injunction was obtained in
Wake County Superior Court by
entry of the Consent Order on
February 2, 2005.
Other: The unlicensed contractor cases
below were resolved with the Board by
other means:
Tasha Wooten and Keith Kelly
d/b/a N.C. Home Warranty
(Gaston County; 03C459). Tasha
Wooten and Keith Kelly repre-sented
themselves as licensed
general contractors and proposed
to remodel a home in Buncombe
County for a price of
$163,275.88. A permanent
injunction was obtained in Wake
County Superior Court when the
Court allowed the Board’s
Motion for Summary Judgment
against Tasha Wooten and
entered Default Judgment against
Keith Kelly on November 16,
2004.
(continued on back page)
N o r t h C a r o l i n a L i c e n s i n g B o a r d f o r G e n e r a l C o n t r a c t o r s
Post Office Box 17187
Raleigh, NC 27619
PRESORTED
STANDARD
U.S. POSTAGE
P A I D
RALEIGH, NC
Permit No. 1230
THREE UNLICENSED CONTRACTORS SUBJECT
TO CRIMINAL CONTEMPT SANCTIONS
Larry W. Brown (Brunswick County; 03C267). In January
2002 the Board filed a lawsuit against Larry W. Brown d/b/a
Brown Construction Company for contracting without a
license. In April 2002 the Court entered a Consent Order that
prohibited Larry W. Brown from engaging in the further
practice of general contracting. In September 2002 and 2003
Mr. Brown contracted with homeowners in Brunswick County
to construct two homes where the cost of each home exceed-ed
$230,000. In a consent order signed on June 7, 2004 Mr.
Brown admitted he was guilty of two instances of criminal
contempt of court. A Wake County Superior Court Judge
ordered that Larry W. Brown be incarcerated for two 30-day
sentences, to run concurrently, in the Brunswick County Jail.
It was further ordered that Mr. Brown serve his sentences by
spending 15 weekends in the Brunswick County Jail.
Will Smith d/b/a CCA Inc. Construction Services (New
Hanover County; 02C57). In March 2000 the Board filed a
lawsuit against Will Smith d/b/a CCA Inc. Construction
Services for contracting without a license. In May 2000 the
Board and Mr. Smith entered into a Consent Order that pro-hibited
Mr. Smith from the further practice of general con-tracting.
In December 2000 Mr. Smith contracted with Living
Waters Ministries in Wilmington to repair and remodel the
church at a cost of $138,843. On January 20, 2004 a Wake
County Superior Court Judge found Mr. Smith guilty of crimi-nal
contempt of court and sentenced him to 30 days in jail for
violating the terms of the prior Consent Order that enjoined
him from the practice of general contracting. Defendant
appealed the conviction, but his appeal was dismissed in May
2004, and Mr. Smith served 30 days in the Wake County Jail.
Erick James Antoine d/b/a Diversified Framing
Contractors (Mecklenburg County; 02C378). In July 2002
the Board filed a lawsuit against Erick James Antoine d/b/a
Diversified Framing Contractors for contracting without a
license. In December 2000 the Board and Mr. Antoine
entered into a Consent Order that prohibited Mr. Antoine
from the further practice of general contracting. In August
2002 Mr. Antoine contracted with a homeowner in Davidson,
North Carolina to renovate a basement for a cost in excess of
$30,000. In a Consent Order signed in July 2004 Mr. Antoine
admitted that he was guilty of criminal contempt of court. A
Wake County Superior Court Judge sentenced Mr. Antoine to
a term of imprisonment for 30 days. Because defendant had
already served more than 30 days in the Mecklenburg County
Jail for related offenses, he was credited with time served.
(Disciplinary Actions continued from page 11)