Dec. 31, 2008
Col. Jefferson Rascavage, Commander
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
P. O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 29402- 1890
Attn: Scott C. McLendon
Re: Memorandum of Agreement ( MOA) Quarterly Report
Dear Col. Rascavage:
The Ecosystem Enhancement Program ( EEP) is pleased to submit the Second Quarterly
Report of State Fiscal Year 2008- 2009 to the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
( USACE), Wilmington District. This Quarterly Report addresses the period beginning
October 1, 2008 and ending December 31, 2008. The materials presented within provide
information as required under Section VII, Part B of the Memorandum of Agreement
among the USACE, the N. C. Department of Transportation ( NCDOT) and the N. C.
Department of Environment and Natural Resources ( NCDENR), signed into effect on
July 22, 2003. The following actions occurred this quarter:
• Throughout this quarter, EEP continued to coordinate matters relative to new federal
rule requirements. USACE and EEP have held and continue to hold meetings to
determine how to achieve the objectives of the new rule. Representatives of the
Environmental Protection Agency, N. C. Division of Water Quality and NCDOT
have also been attending these meetings.
• EEP continued to transfer credits to NCDOT on case- by- case basis to draw down
surplus assets, a decision that resulted from the August 2007 workshop.
• Overall conformance remains in good standing. Details are provided in this
quarterly report. EEP remains committed to the success of this innovative
partnership. We appreciate the continued leadership provided by your office.
Col. Rascavage
Dec. 31, 2008
Page Two
Please contact me should you have any questions regarding this report.
Respectfully,
William D. Gilmore, PE
Director, Ecosystem Enhancement Program
cc: David Knight, Assistant Secretary for Natural Resources, NCDENR
Terry Gibson, Highway Administrator, NCDOT
North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural
Resources
ECOSYSTEM
ENHANCEMENT
PROGRAM
QUARTERLY REPORT
Oct. 1 through Dec. 31, 2008
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report
Oct. 1 through Dec. 31, 2008
Table of Contents
Page
i. Introduction 3
ii. Report Structure 3
Section I. EEP Restoration, Enhancement, Creation and Preservation Projects 4
EEP Gross Assets 4
EEP Gross Asset Summary 5
EEP Net Remaining Assets 5
High Quality Preservation Gross Assets 5
High Quality Preservation Sites Acquired This Quarter 6
High Quality Preservation Net Remaining Assets 6
Section II. Tri- Party Memorandum of Agreement 6
MOA Gross and Net Assets 6
MOA Current Mitigation Requirements, Debits and Commitments 7
MOA Future Requirements 8
MOA Future Expectations 9
MOA Conformance 10
Section III. Memorandum of Understanding In- Lieu Fee ( MOU ILF) Program 10
MOU ILF Gross and Net Assets 10
MOU ILF Present and Future Quarter Mitigation Requirements 10
MOU ILF Net Asset Balances 11
MOU ILF Conformance 11
MOU ILF Future Expectations 12
Section IV. Planning 13
Local Watershed Planning for Projected Impacts 13
Section V. Monitoring 14
USGS Eight- Digit Cataloging Units Map 15
Section VI. EEP Compliance Action Strategies by Cataloging Unit 16
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report: Oct. 1, 2008 – Dec. 31, 2008 1
Appendix List and Description
Appendix A EEP Tier 1 Stream and Wetland Restoration, Enhancement, Creation and
Preservation Sites – Gross Asset Project List
Appendix B EEP Tier 1 Stream and Wetland Restoration, Enhancement, Creation and
Preservation Sites – Gross Asset Summary
Appendix C EEP Tier 1 Stream and Wetland Restoration, Enhancement, Creation and
Preservation Sites ( in Credits) – Net Asset Summary ( in Credits)
Appendix D Tier 1 High Quality Preservation Sites – Gross Asset Project List and
Summary
D1 – Tier 1 High Quality Preservation Sites – Gross Asset Project List
D2 – Tier 1 High Quality Preservation Sites – Gross Asset Summary
Appendix E Tier 1 High Quality Preservation Sites – Net Asset and Debit Summaries
E1 – Tier 1 High Quality Preservation Sites – Net Asset Summary
E2 – Tier 1 High Quality Preservation Sites – Asset Debit Summary
Appendix F MOA Mitigation Requirements, Debits and Commitments
F1 – MOA Permit Mitigation Requirements and Debits
F2 – MOA Year 5 Mitigation Requirements
F3 – MOA Year 5 Mitigation Requirements Summary
F4 – MOA Mitigation Commitments List
F5 – MOA Mitigation Commitments Summary
( Potential Future Requirements Not Yet Permitted)
Appendix G MOA Future Requirements – Remaining NCDOT Projected Impacts
Appendix H MOA Net Asset Balances ( Surplus and Deficits)
Appendix I MOA Outstanding Permit Mitigation Requirements
Appendix J MOU ILF Present and Future Quarter Mitigation Requirements
Appendix K MOU ILF Net Asset Balances ( Surplus and Deficits)
Appendix L MOU ILF Outstanding Permit Mitigation Requirements
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report: Oct. 1, 2008 – Dec. 31, 2008 2
i. Introduction
This report covers the period beginning Oct. 1, 2008, through Dec. 30, 2008. This
report documents the quarterly status of both the Memorandum of Understanding
( MOU) between NCDENR and USACE established in 1998 and Memorandum of
Agreement ( MOA) among NCDENR, USACE and NCDOT, signed July 22,
2003, and combines reporting into a single document. It is expected that the
format of this report will evolve as improvements and adjustments are suggested
and made by USACE and other interested parties. For more information about
the agreements, visit our Web site at www. nceep. net.
ii. Report Structure
This report is broken into seven main sections:
SECTION I. EEP Restoration, Enhancement, Creation and Preservation Projects-
This section reports the EEP stream and wetland restoration, enhancement,
creation and preservation projects that have been developed under the MOA and
MOU ILF programs. This section lists EEP projects provides a summary of
Gross Assets and a summary of Net Assets.
SECTION II. MOA– This section details specifics regarding the MOA program.
SECTION III. MOU ILF– This section details specifics regarding the MOU ILF
program.
SECTION IV. Planning– This section summarizes watershed- planning efforts
during the quarter.
SECTION V. Monitoring– This section summarizes project- monitoring efforts
during the quarter.
SECTION VI. Compliance Action Strategies by Cataloging Unit– This section
discusses the specific action strategies EEP has in place to address any
outstanding mitigation needs in the various river basins and cataloging units in
North Carolina.
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report Oct. 1, 2008 – Dec. 31, 2008 3
SECTION I:
EEP RESTORATION, ENHANCEMENT, CREATION AND PRESERVATION
PROJECTS
Section I is a report on the status of the restoration, enhancement, creation and
preservation projects developed by the Ecosystem Enhancement Program. High
Quality Preservation ( HQP) projects are also summarized independently of EEP’s
other restoration, enhancement and preservation projects.
EEP GROSS ASSETS
During this reporting period, EEP had assets exceeding 1,709,152 linear feet of stream
and 21,108.00 acres of wetlands. In addition to these, EEP has instituted HQP assets
equaling 1,242,025 linear feet ( over 235 miles) of streams, 7,087 acres of riparian
wetlands, 1,490 acres nonriparian wetlands, and 16.60 acres of coastal- marsh wetlands.
EEP projects originate from three main areas:
1. Projects that were initiated by NCDOT;
2. Projects that were initiated by the NCDENR Wetlands Restoration
Program; and
3. Projects that have been initiated by EEP.
Appendix A: EEP Tier 1 Stream and Wetland Restoration, Enhancement,
Creation and Preservation Sites – Gross Asset Project List contains a
complete listing of the current EEP individual stream and wetland restoration,
enhancement, creation and preservation projects as of Dec. 31, 2008, by river
basin and eight- digit Cataloging Unit ( CU). ( HQP sites are not listed in this
table.)
All of the projects listed in Appendix A have had their mitigation credits
transferred to or originated from EEP. For former NCDOT projects that had
completed construction prior to the formation of EEP, only the undebited
remaining restoration, enhancement or preservation feet/ acres were transferred.
Thus Appendix A only shows the transferred restoration, enhancement or
preservation remaining for these projects ( i. e., the assets that had not been utilized
by NCDOT). In some cases, former NCDOT projects had no remaining credits
associated with a specific project. These projects are listed as having no gross
assets in Appendix A. All of the other types of projects show the gross amount of
restoration, enhancement or preservation associated with these projects. These
numbers are subject to change as design or monitoring results are received.
Projects initiated ( but not completed/ not debited) by NCDOT’s Project
Development and Environmental Analysis Branch prior to the inception of the
EEP are in various stages of implementation. EEP staff is currently managing
these projects. EEP will use these mitigation credits according to the guidelines
of the Tri- Party MOA. The projects that were initiated by NCDOT as full-
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report Oct. 1, 2008 – Dec. 31, 2008 4
delivery projects are currently under contract with NCDOT but are available for
debiting for the purposes of EEP, as determined by credit- release schedules.
Projects that were initiated and developed by the staff of the NCDENR Wetlands
Restoration Program have been acquired as defined by the 1998 MOU between
USACE and NCDENR, or the 2003 EEP Tri- Party MOA.
EEP GROSS ASSET SUMMARY
Appendix B: EEP Tier 1 Stream and Wetland Restoration, Enhancement,
Creation and Preservation Sites – Gross Asset Summary is a summary of the
gross assets by river basin, CU and program ( MOA or MOU ILF). Appendix B
also provides grand totals for the entire state. These numbers are subject to
change as design and/ or monitoring results are received or as new projects are
added into the program. Also, as stated above, former NCDOT sites that were
completed and partially debited prior to the formation of EEP contain only the
remaining credits from each site. This means that only the remaining credits ( as
determined by NCDOT and USACE) were summarized in this table for NCDOT
transferred projects.
EEP NET REMAINING ASSETS
Appendix C: EEP Tier 1 Stream and Wetland Restoration, Enhancement,
Creation and Preservation Sites – Net Asset Summary ( in Credits) is a
summary of the remaining assets associated with restoration, enhancement,
creation and preservation projects that EEP currently has available to meet future
compensatory- mitigation requirements. The remaining assets are summarized for
the MOA and MOU ILF programs, respectively. Note that the assets have been
converted into restoration and restoration- equivalent credits in this table. The
amounts of mitigation provided in the table are the total remaining amount of
mitigation available to a particular project over time. Where credit- release
schedules have been established, EEP will debit from these projects accordingly.
Note that these credits can also be considered currently available advanced-mitigation
credits, though the level of advancement varies from instituted to
complete.
Also note that amounts of mitigation for any project may change from the current
snapshot as additional design and monitoring information becomes available, or
as mitigation units are refined as per the goals set forth in the current Tri- Party as
amended in 2007.
HIGH QUALITY PRESERVATION GROSS ASSETS
Appendix D1: Tier 1 High Quality Preservation ( HQP) Sites – Gross Asset
Project List displays all HQP that EEP has acquired since July 2003 by
ecoregion. All HQP assets are MOA assets. Gross stream and wetland feet or
acreages are subject to change as additional survey work is completed on these
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report Oct. 1, 2008 – Dec. 31, 2008 5
sites. EEP has protected more than 235 miles of stream, along with 7,087 acres of
riparian wetland and 1,489 acres of non- riparian wetland through HQP.
No new HQP closings were completed during the quarter.
Appendix D2: Tier 1 High Quality Preservation Sites – Gross Asset
Summary lists balances by ecoregion. Total beginning balance for stream feet is
1,242,050.50, riparian wetland acre balance is 7,087.47, non- riparian acre balance
is 1,489.64, and coastal marsh acre balance is 16.60.
HIGH QUALITY PRESERVATION NET REMAINING ASSETS
Appendix E1: Tier 1 High Quality Preservation Sites – Net Asset Summary
lists the net remaining HQP assets available for future debits by ecoregion.
Currently, all HQP assets are located in the MOA Program. Gross stream and
wetland feet or acreages are subject to change as additional survey work is
completed on sites.
More than $ 74 million has been spent to date to protect these conservation lands.
Across the state, EEP has net HQP assets of 798,499.00 feet ( 151 miles) of
stream, 6,533 acres of riparian wetlands, 1,214 acres of non- riparian wetland, and
16.6 acres of coastal- marsh wetlands. These assets include properties secured
with recorded option agreements, permanent conservation easements, and fee-simple
purchases.
Projections indicate that most of these net HQP mitigation units will be fully
utilized within the current NCDOT Transportation Improvement Program ( TIP).
To further the goal of no net loss of aquatic resources, utilization of these
preservation sites will be accompanied by restoration- type mitigation projects
within the same watershed where impacts occur.
SECTION II:
TRI- PARTY MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT ( MOA)
This section of the report provides specifics with regard to the EEP Tri- Party
MOA. Specifically, this section describes the current EEP mitigation acceptances
under the MOA, the debits that have been made thus far, the schedule for future
debits, and the remaining projected impacts that NCDOT has supplied that may
indicate when future requirements may occur.
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report Oct. 1, 2008 – Dec. 31, 2008 6
MOA GROSS AND NET ASSETS
Both gross and net assets are listed in appendices B and C as described in Section
I.
MOA CURRENT MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS, DEBITS, AND COMMITMENTS
This section describes EEP’s current regulatory requirements, debits and
commitments for the MOA program. EEP, regulatory agencies and NCDOT
follow rigorous procedures in order for EEP to assume mitigation responsibility
for NCDOT- permitted impacts.
In accordance with the Tri- Party MOA, NCDOT forecasts impacts associated
with each of its transportation projects with a construction schedule within the
next seven years. EEP uses this projected impact information to develop
restoration, enhancement, creation and preservation projects sufficient to meet
mitigation needs and timelines. Approximately six- to- nine months in advance of
an individual NCDOT transportation- project letting, NCDOT formally submits a
request to EEP to provide the mitigation. EEP reviews each request and submits
acceptance letters to NCDOT and the regulatory agencies for each project where
EEP assumes mitigation responsibility. These acceptance letters are used during
NCDOT’s permitting process. Typically, there is a three- to- six month time
period between EEP’s acceptance letters and the permit issuance. The permit
specifies the responsible party ( EEP for off- site mitigation), location, amount and
type of the mitigation. Prior to permit issuances, all EEP- issued acceptance letters
are considered “ commitments.” After permit issuances, EEP’s commitments are
transformed into mitigation “ requirements.” The permit issuance date determines
the timeframes when EEP must provide the mitigation ( this time frame is often
called the debit- due date).
On March 8, 2007, Section X of the Tri- Party MOA was amended, changing the
future mitigation debit- due dates and mitigation milestones. For MOA permits
issued in MOA Year 6 ( July 1, 2008 through June 30, 2009), the debit- due date is
June 30, 2009. ( For MOU permits issued in MOA Year 6, the debit due date is
June 30, 2010.)
Appendix F is a series of five tables listing data for MOA Mitigation
Requirements, Debits, and Commitments.
F1- MOA Permit Requirements and Debits lists all mitigation requirements
that were due as of Dec. 31, 2008, and lists mitigation debits that have been made
to offset those requirements.
F2- MOA Year 6 Mitigation Requirements lists projects for which permits
have been accepted, issued and received by EEP in MOA Year 6. Mitigation for
these projects will be due on Dec. 31, 2008.
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report Oct. 1, 2008 – Dec. 31, 2008 7
F3- MOA Year 6 Mitigation Requirements Summary summarizes mitigation
requirements for projects listed in Appendix F2.
F4- MOA Mitigation Commitments List lists projects for which EEP has issued
mitigation acceptance letters, but permits have not yet been issued/ received. The
mitigation due date is determined by permit- issuance date and Section X of the
2007 TriParty MOA. Since these projects have not yet been permitted, mitigation
has not yet been required. However, EEP has applied some credits in advance.
The table lists the HQP sites that have been debited and applied in advance of the
official mitigation due date.
( Note: Impacts and mitigation requirements listed in table F4 are projections
only. The actual finalized impacts and mitigation requirements will not be known
until permits are issued. However, the table does list the amount of mitigation
that EEP has thus far committed to provide for these projects as detailed in EEP’s
mitigation- acceptance letters.)
F5- MOA Mitigation Commitments Summary summarizes the list of
commitments detailed in Appendix F4.
MOA FUTURE REQUIREMENTS
Appendix G: MOA Future Requirements - Remaining NCDOT Projected
Impacts is a summary of the NCDOT mitigation order shown as impacts
associated with NCDOT’s seven- year TIP. Appendix G is summarized by river
basin, CU and MOA impact year. The data in Appendix G originates from the
original seven- year impact forecast submitted by NCDOT to EEP in February
2008. Some of the individual project impact projections have been updated by
more recently collected field data. These revised impacts were submitted by
NCDOT on a project- by- project basis over the last quarter. Appendix G has also
been updated to show only the remaining forecasted impacts covering the seven-year
projection time period. In other words, since February 2008 some of the
original forecasted impacts are no longer forecasts, as NCDOT has formally
requested that EEP accept mitigation responsibility for specific impacts associated
with the transportation projects. Appendix G summarizes only those projects
where NCDOT has yet to request mitigation or where EEP has not yet formally
accepted mitigation responsibility. NCDOT divisions were unable to provide
impacts by individual MOA Year and developed a lump- sum estimate for seven
years. This lump- sum amount was spread evenly through each of the seven TIP
years.
All projects that were projected to occur in MOA Years 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 and that
were not accepted or permitted during these periods are now considered as MOA
Year 6 impact projections.
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report Oct. 1, 2008 – Dec. 31, 2008 8
The TIP list is a dynamic list where individual project let dates frequently move in
time. Major accelerations or volatility of project lettings or impact projections
could result in major changes to EEP’s potential mitigation requirements and
EEP’s procurement strategies.
MOA FUTURE EXPECTATIONS
During Year 4, the issue of surplus assets became significant among the Tri- Party
agencies. At the time of this report, surplus assets were defined as “ unused”
credits that are projected to be remaining after accounting for the number of
credits that will be used to meet the current TIP ( 5 to 6 years of TIP projects) and
one year of ILF requirements. Surplus assets currently exist in a number of CUs.
Surplus assets were mostly developed during the pre- EEP era when NCDOT
initiated its first attempt at developing advanced mitigation. Unfortunately, these
advances were often made without the benefit of precise forecasts of mitigation
need. These sites were originally developed with the intent to negotiate usage on
a case- by- case basis. Today, many of these sites contain credits that exceed the
forecasted need of the current TIP. Surplus mitigation has also been created when
mitigation orders based on forecasted mitigation needs have exceeded actual
permitted mitigation requirements. Incidental procurement ( when wetlands and
stream credits exist on the same project, though only one type may be needed)
and asset- yield variation on existing projects may also lead to small amounts of
forecasted surplus.
NCDOT also has been experiencing financial strain and has expressed an interest
in utilizing these advanced mitigation credits to offset current and future
mitigation need. To address these issues, NCDOT, USACE and NCDENR met in
July 2007 to develop a plan to:
1. Create a strategy for reducing existing surplus assets used for offsetting
NCDOT project impacts. This became the top priority for the August 2007
surplus- assets workshop.
2. Prevent the creation of new surplus assets that are intended to offset NCDOT
project impacts.
During this surplus- strategy development period and after discussions with
USACE, NCDENR, and NCDOT, EEP ceased procurement of new mitigation
sites in CUs in river basins that contain surplus credits that may be used by
the NCDOT as permittee- provided mitigation on a case- by- case or umbrella
bank process. Consequently, MOA conformance in these river basins may
decline through the next MOA year because of the requested hold on
procuring new mitigation sites in these areas. This decrease in conformance
will be moderated due to the substantial advanced mitigation that has already been
achieved for MOA Year 5. During Quarter 3, NCDOT had completed the initial
identification of transportation projects for which NCDOT would seek case- by-
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report Oct. 1, 2008 – Dec. 31, 2008 9
case mitigation approval. Consequently, this has allowed EEP to begin
procurement again for projects not seeking case- by- case approval.
Appendix H: MOA Net Asset Balances ( Surplus and Deficits) demonstrates
the current health of the program by showing the current net surpluses and deficits
associated with the MOA program as of Dec. 31, 2008.
As shown in Appendix C, EEP has obtained a program- wide 676,204 advanced
stream credits, 2,897.59 advanced riparian- wetland credits, 6,692.53 advanced
nonriparian- wetland credits and 130.65 advanced coastal- marsh wetland credits.
Of these amounts, the MOA program has advanced 650,299 stream credits,
2,696.45 riparian credits, 6,591.14 nonriparian credits, and 127.15 coastal marsh
credits. These advanced summaries do not include the advanced and unused HQP
assets which are shown in Appendix E1. These credits are advanced credits that
will be applied to future permits as mitigation is needed.
MOA CONFORMANCE
During the second quarter, overall MOA conformance increased slightly since the
last quarter. Coastal- marsh conformance remained unchanged at 100 percent.
Stream conformance dropped slightly from 95.89 to 95.64 percent. Riparian
conformance increased from 98.80 to 99.98 percent and nonriparian conformance
climbed from 98.80 to 98.89.
The current outstanding stream, riparian wetland, nonriparian and coastal marsh
wetland mitigation for Quarter 2 is 9,478.60 stream credits, 0.03 riparian credits,
4.66 nonriparian credits and zero coastal- marsh credits.
A complete listing of the MOA permit requirements not in full conformance is
listed in Appendix I: MOA Outstanding Permit Mitigation Requirements.
Seventeen of the outstanding permits needing additional mitigation have been
partially fulfilled. EEP’s Conformance Action Strategies for outstanding
mitigation requirements are detailed in Section VI.
SECTION III:
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING In- Lieu Fee ( MOU ILF) Program
MOU ILF ASSETS – GROSS AND NET ASSETS
Both gross and net assets are listed in appendices B and C as described in Section
I.
MOU ILF PRESENT AND FUTURE QUARTER MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS
The MOU ILF program had 14 new requirements that became due this quarter
( with one permit requirement drop), representing 1,040 credits of stream, 2.26
credits of riparian wetland, 2.60 credits of nonriparian wetland and zero credits of
coastal- marsh requirements. A complete summary of the requirements that
became due is listed in Appendix J: MOU ILF Present and Future Quarter
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report Oct. 1, 2008 – Dec. 31, 2008 10
Mitigation Requirements. Appendix J also lists requirements that will become
due over the next quarter. The requirements associated with the MOU ILF
Program do not include mitigation related to the Tri- Party MOA.
MOU ILF NET ASSET BALANCES
Unlike the Tri- Party MOA program, the goal of which is to develop assets up to
seven years in advance of permitted impacts, the MOU ILF program is designed
to produce instituted mitigation assets one year from the permit year in which a
permit is issued.
Another major objective of the MOU ILF program is to have MOU ILF
applicants pay the actual costs incurred for operating the MOU ILF program.
Together, these two goals result in a delicate balance of building assets in just the
right sizes and just the right amounts in each of the CUs to offset permitted
requirements, while maintaining sufficient funds to pay for the required
mitigation projects. In order to capitalize on efficiencies of scale, restoration
project sizes tend to be large. On the other hand, MOU ILF mitigation
requirements tend to be very small. Thus, there is always the potential to create
surplus assets in some CUs and deficits in other CUs. The MOU ILF program is
at optimal performance when there are zero surplus assets and zero requirement
deficits, and sufficient remaining funds to pay for existing projects.
The current net MOU ILF program- asset balances ( surplus and deficits) are
shown in Appendix K: MOU ILF Net Asset Balances ( Surplus and Deficits).
The MOU ILF program has produced a net statewide asset balance of 16,195
stream credits, 199.89 riparian- wetland credits, 92.77 nonriparian- wetland credits
and 3.31 coastal- marsh wetland credits.
These asset balances show a decrease from the previous quarter in net balances of
credits for riparian wetlands and nonriparian wetlands. Coastal marsh remained
the same. There was an increase in the stream balance. During the last quarter,
the net- asset balance was 13,207 credits of stream, 207.45 credits of riparian
wetlands, 94.55 nonriparian- wetland credits and 3.31 coastal- marsh wetland
credits.
( Note: The total amounts of MOU ILF available unused credits are shown in
Appendix C. The available unused credits are larger because outstanding
requirements ( deficits) are not considered in Appendix C.)
MOU ILF CONFORMANCE
The amount of conformance ( as measured in number of permit requirements met)
increased slightly during the current quarter with the addition of 14 new
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report Oct. 1, 2008 – Dec. 31, 2008 11
requirements. During the last quarter, 96.76 percent of requirements were fully
met. This quarter, 96.90 percent of all requirements were fully met.
As of Dec. 31, 2008, the MOU ILF program had 1000 total requirements. Of
these, 968 are conformant, 7 are in partial conformance and 25 are in non-conformance.
Therefore the EEP has 96.80 percent of all MOU ILF requirements
in full conformance, 0.70 percent in partial conformance and 2.50 percent in non-conformance.
During the previous quarter, 32 requirements had not been fully
met. Of the current 32 non- conformant requirements, 23 are related to wetland
requirements, with one of these being a coastal- marsh requirement, and nine are
related to stream requirements.
The magnitude of outstanding stream requirements increased this quarter. At the
end of the last quarter, EEP had not met 8,137 credits of stream mitigation. As of
Dec. 31, 2008, the remaining outstanding stream- mitigation needs were 9,737
stream credits. Stream compliance ( as measured by magnitude) in the MOU ILF
program is 97.71 percent.
The magnitude of outstanding riparian credits decreased from 4.2 to 1.3. The
magnitude of outstanding nonriparian increased from 7.3 to 8.6 nonriparian
wetland credits, coastal- marsh wetland remained at 0.20 credits. Wetland
compliance ( as measured by magnitude) in the MOU ILF program is 98.38
percent.
A complete listing of the permit requirements not in full conformance is listed in
Appendix L: MOU ILF Outstanding Permit Mitigation Requirements. A
narrative addressing EEP action plans for non- conformant CUs is included in this
report in Section VI.
MOU ILF FUTURE EXPECTATIONS
The status of the MOU ILF program is expected to be relatively steady over the
course of the next fiscal year, though some decreases in conformance may be
expected since all EEP projects in development were placed on hold between June
and November 2007 while the surplus- asset issue previously described was being
discussed among the Tri- Party agencies. Additional buying and selling of excess
assets between the MOA and MOU ILF programs is expected to continue. These
transactions will result in improved conformance capabilities for both programs.
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report Oct. 1, 2008 – Dec. 31, 2008 12
SECTION IV:
PLANNING
In Quarter 2, EEP began the following watershed planning initiatives:
��� Feasibility study for incorporating dam- removal project into LWPs based on the new
guidance distributed by the USACE.
• Identify LWP area in Cape Fear 06 as the Great Coharie Creek LWP.
EEP continued the following initiatives:
• CU- screening activities in Neuse 01 to support Wake County collaboration and to
develop River Basin Restoration Priorities: analyzing Watershed Attribute Matrices,
conducting field site visits, meeting with local Resource Professionals, and hosting
workshops to solicit input on priority watersheds for restoration.
• Targeted Local Watershed ( TLW) delisting strategy development.
• Collaboration with Wake County government agencies to develop a countywide.
watershed plan. The proposed strategy under development will combine the county’s
desire to purchase easements and preserve green space and EEP’s mission to produce
projects that improve watershed function.
• CU- screening activities in Broad 05, Catawba 01, Cape Fear 02 and 03, Roanoke 02,
03, 04, Chowan 03 and 04, Yadkin 01 and 02, and the Lumber, New, Savannah and
Watauga basins, to develop River Basin Restoration Priorities: analyzing Watershed
Attribute Matrices, conducting field tours of candidate TLWs, meeting with local
Resource Professionals, and soliciting input on priority watersheds for restoration.
• Joint Phase IV plan development for Little Lick Creek, Lick Creek, Ellerbe Creek,
Swift Creek and Lake Rogers watersheds in the Upper Neuse.
• Crisp Creek Drainage District Phase IV plan demonstration project in Tar- Pamlico
03.
• Indian and Howard’s Creek in Catawba 02. Completed Phase I and began fieldwork
for Phase II along with Water Quality and Benthos monitoring. This plan is being
done in part to meet wetland and stream mitigation needs in Catawba 03.
• Phase I Franklin to Fontana LWP.
• Phases II & III Fishing Creek LWP.
• Phases II & III LWP in White Oak 01 and White Oak 06 CUs.
• Collaboration with the Coastal Habitat Protection Plan implementation workgroup.
• Work with CGIA to develop maps of all 1601 HUs.
• Phase IV activities in the Lower Creek LWP, working with the Lower Creek
Advisory Team to identify collaborative restoration opportunities.
• Work with Tetra Tech in the Catawba 03 to assess and identify non- traditional
mitigation opportunities to accommodate unmet wetland needs.
• Collaborative work with U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service and other state and federal
agencies on aquatic organism passage in the Little Tennessee River basin.
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report Oct. 1, 2008 – Dec. 31, 2008 13
Eco system Enhancement Program Quarterly Report Oct. 1, 2008 – Dec. 31, 2008 14
• Phase IV activities in the Peachtree- Martins Creek LWP area, focusing on landowner
outreach for priority watershed- restoration activities and developing watershed
education materials.
• Participation in the Chatham County Partnership to help promote implementation of
the Rocky River LWP and identify wetland- restoration opportunities.
• Phase IV efforts in the Muddy Creek watershed in McDowell County ( Catawba 01),
performing landowner outreach for priority restoration projects.
• Watershed assessment work to support the “ fast track” LWP effort in Surry County
( Yadkin 01). Note: There has been a significant drop in programmatic mitigation
needs within the Yadkin 01 CU( 03040101). The contract with McAdams-
EcoEngineering has been stopped ( effective Oct. 31, 2008). Water- quality
monitoring activities by DWQ will continue, in order to support limited project
identification efforts within selected priority sub- watersheds. Western EEP staff will
continue to work with local resource professionals in Surry County over the next year
to identify the most promising candidate sites for remaining stream mitigation needs.
• Phase I efforts on the Goose and Crooked Creek LWP in the Yadkin 05 CU, located
in Union County near the City of Charlotte. The final Watershed Technical Team
meeting is expected to take place in late January for the Phase I work, with Phase
II/ III work expecting to kick- off in March or April of 2009.
EEP completed the following initiatives:
• Updates to use EEP’s Web site specific to Watershed Planning
( http:// www. nceep. net/ pages/ lwplanning. htm).
• Phase III of the Tickle, Travis and Little Alamance Creek LWP.
• Lumber RBRP and Lower Yadkin RBRP ( including Yadkin 03, 04, 05, 201 and 202).
SECTION V:
MONITORING
During the Quarter 2, monitoring reports begin coming in, with most in by the end of
November. The monitoring staff’s predominant activity during this quarter is the review
of these monitoring reports. Currently, 216 projects are in the monitoring phase. A little
over half are with the design- bid- build ( 116) delivery system with the remaining projects
comprising the Full Delivery ( 100) method.
In addition to monitoring report review during this quarter, staff were involved with the
management of contracts, project deliverables, and site visits associated with managing
over 100 restoration/ enhancement projects in the monitoring phase. Two staff presented
and moderated at the 2008 Stream Restoration Conference held in Asheville.
system Enhancement Program Quarterly Report Oct. Eco 1, 2008 – Dec. 31, 2008 15
SECTION VI:
EEP COMPLIANCE ACTION STRATEGIES BY CATALOGING UNIT
ACTION STRATEGIES FOR NON- COMPLIANT CUs
CAPE FEAR 03030002
Outstanding Mitigation Required
Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent
Stream 0 0
Riparian 0 0
Non- riparian 0.891 0.891
Coastal Marsh 0 0
Background:
Cape Fear 03030002 is a high demand CU for stream and riparian wetland
mitigation needs. Nonriparian wetland impacts are inconsistent, most likely due
to the relative scarcity of nonriparian wetlands in the watershed. EEP and
NCDOT are discussing some of the projected nonriparian wetland impacts
submitted in February 2008 to determine if the impacts are in fact nonriparian
wetlands. Based on the characteristics of this CU, it is probable that many of the
current projected nonriparian wetland impacts may actually be riparian wetlands.
EEP has placed on hold procurement of the long term future nonriparian- wetland
mitigation until this issue is resolved.
CU Immediate Action Plan:
The EEP Watershed Planning and Project Implementation ( WPPI) section has
been assigned responsibility for implementing 2.5 Restoration ( R) and 2.5
Restoration Equivalent ( RE) type nonriparian- wetland mitigation credits to meet
immediate needs.
CU Long- Range Action Plan:
EEP plans to issue Full Delivery Request for Proposals ( FD RFP) for nonriparian
wetland mitigation credits for the long- term needs within the CU. The magnitude
of the request will be based primarily on projected long- term NCDOT
nonriparian- wetland mitigation needs. The FD RFP will not be issued until the
immediate issue related to the nonriparian- wetland projection is resolved.
CAPE FEAR 03030003
Outstanding Mitigation Required
Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent
Stream 0 0
Riparian 0 0
Non- riparian 2.0 1.95
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report Oct. 1, 2008 – Dec. 31, 2008 16
Coastal Marsh 0 0
Background:
The LaGrange mitigation site was the only mitigation site in this cataloging unit
that provided nonriparian- wetland mitigation. The project was dropped during
the Quarter 1 due to the substantial drop in anticipated nonriparian- restoration
wetland credits the site would provide, and because the increase in cost per credit
was no longer within a practical budget.
The LaGrange site was transferred to the EEP from the NCDOT to implement the
design of the site based on the feasible study. During the review of the feasibly
study, a calculation error of the site’s hydrology was discovered that dramatically
decreased the potential wetland credits associated with the site. This was the only
mitigation site to provide nonriparian- wetland mitigation in the cataloging unit.
After discussion with the NCDOT, it was decided to go forward with the project
even though the drop in credits was substantial. As the design of the site
progress, the cost per credit and the overall risk of success kept rising and
additional discussions between the NCDOT and EEP were held. After several
meetings, it was determined that going forward with this mitigation site would not
be in the best interest of meeting the nonriparian- wetland needs.
CU Immediate Action Plan:
WPPI has been assigned responsibility for procuring 2.5 Restoration ( R) and 2.5
Restoration Equivalent ( RE) type non- riparian wetland mitigation credits to meet
immediate needs.
CU Long- Range Action Plan:
EEP plans to issue a FD RFP for non- riparian wetland mitigation credits for the
long- term needs within the CU. The magnitude of the request will be based
primarily on projected long- term NCDOT nonriparian- wetland mitigation needs.
The FD RFP will not be issued until the immediate issue related to the
nonriparian- wetland projection is resolved.
CATAWBA 03050101
Outstanding Mitigation Required
Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent
Stream 1,220.16 140
Riparian 0 0
Non- riparian 0 0
Coastal Marsh 0 0
Background:
Stream and wetland mitigation needs in Catawba 03050101 have remained steady
over the last few years under WRP and now EEP. Due to the high amount of
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report Oct. 1, 2008 – Dec. 31, 2008 17
development and road- improvements projects located within this CU and the
ability to utilize some of the mitigation credits in Catawba 03050103, the amount
of both wetland and stream mitigation has risen. EEP anticipates this trend to
continue for the foreseeable future. The outstanding stream mitigation required is
associated with two permits, with one being partially met; the second was a new
requirement for this quarter. Both of these outstanding stream- mitigation
requirements will be resolved during the next quarter.
CU Immediate Action Plan:
WPPI has been assigned responsibility for procuring and implementing all
wetland and stream mitigation needed in this CU at the current time. WPPI has
been very active in this CU locating suitable areas to conduct stream- and
wetland- mitigation activities based on watershed planning and contacting land
owners; however, at the end of this quarter all of the stream mitigation credits
needed to meet the outstanding need were not complete. There are several
stream- mitigation projects that will complete acquisition and begin design over
the next few weeks and should be available during the next quarter with sufficient
credits to meet the outstanding stream needs listed above.
CU Long- Range Action Plan:
EEP plans to continue locating suitable areas to conduct stream- and wetland-mitigation
activities based on watershed planning and contact land owners to
implement the projects needed to meet the needs in this CU.
CATAWBA 03050103
Outstanding Mitigation Required
Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent
Stream 0 0
Riparian 0.785 0
Non- riparian 2.17 0.37
Coastal Marsh 0 0
Background:
Catawba 03050103 has been identified as a critical CU watershed in the state by
EEP, as it is a very difficult CU for producing compensatory mitigation for
streams and wetlands. Catawba 03050103 is comprised mostly of the greater
Charlotte metropolitan area. Most streams in Catawba 03050103 are degraded
and have experienced the growing pains of urbanization and, more recently,
suburban sprawl. Urbanization presents challenges in producing stream
mitigation projects due to arduous constraints often in place along these streams.
Typical constraints include sewer lines along and in the streams; residential,
industrial and commercial development in the floodplain; FEMA regulated
streams; hazardous waste; stormwater outlets; unknown pipe outlets; local
ordinances; leaking sewer lines; chemical spills; local landfills within the stream;
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report Oct. 1, 2008 – Dec. 31, 2008 18
the relative large size of streams per acre watershed; large numbers of landowners
per potential project site; etc. Each of these constraints limits the type and size of
the potential stream restoration mitigation project, and also significantly increases
the cost of these projects. Nevertheless, EEP has worked closely with
Mecklenburg County, the City of Charlotte and the regulatory agencies to produce
adequate stream- mitigation projects to compensate for impacts. However, since
impacts are continuing at a rapid rate, it is unlikely that EEP can continue to
produce traditional stream- mitigation projects within the CU at the same rate that
mitigation requirements are being produced.
Wetlands restoration is extremely limited within this CU. Nearly all of remaining
wetlands within the CU are located along large river floodplains, or are relatively
small mafic- type depressional wetlands. These wetlands are continually being
impacted, as development and urbanization is occurring at very high levels within
this CU. Restoration opportunities for these types of wetlands do not exist in any
significant quantity within this CU. Most of the historical wetlands loss is
currently occupied either by development or located along riparian systems.
Wetlands restoration along riparian systems is also typically not possible because
the streams are regulated under stringent FEMA no- rise regulations. In order to
perform most riparian wetlands restoration, the stream level often needs to be
elevated so that the stream can access its historic floodplain. FEMA and local
regulations make this exceedingly difficult in most of this CU. Also, raising flood
elevations is problematic because of the amount of floodplain development
located in this CU. Finally, locating suitable wetlands restoration opportunities
has been made more difficult because of soil mapping in Mecklenburg County.
The current Mecklenburg Division of Soil and Water soil map has not indicated
any hydric A soils. While hydric A soils certainly exist in Mecklenburg, the maps
do not detail their locations. Typically, floodplains are mapped as Monacan soils,
which often have hydric inclusions.
Another problem associated with wetland restoration within this CU is the amount
of time it will take for a specific wetland- restoration project to be constructed.
Due to FEMA and local regulations, most wetland projects will need to undergo a
long flood- level modeling and evaluation period. The result is one to three
additional years to complete construction beyond projects that do not require this
level of modeling.
This historical presence of endangered mussel species also has made
implementation of projects difficult in this watershed. EEP is having difficulty in
getting permits to implement some projects in the watershed due to USFWS
concerns that the restoration of upstream tributaries will cause temporary
sedimentation during construction that could negatively affect downstream
populations of endangered species. USFWS typically supports riparian vegetation
restoration only in these types of areas. Unfortunately, the in- stream conditions of
many of these degraded streams are too unstable to allow for riparian- vegetation
only restoration to be successful.
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report Oct. 1, 2008 – Dec. 31, 2008 19
The overall degree of difficulty in identifying stream- and wetland- restoration
opportunities is reflected in the results of the last six FD RFPs issued by EEP and
WRP. After the first five RFPs, EEP/ WRP had received zero wetland project
submittals and only two small stream projects. The stream projects were located
along the outer edge of the developing regions. Four of the last five requests have
received no response. The last RFP has had some submittals. These submittals
were expected to be opened during the last quarter. After review, the submittals
were rejected due to extremely high costs.
Historically, there have been 51 requirements paid and now due in the MOU
program in Catawba 03050103. Of these, 38 have been stream requirements, 12
riparian- wetland requirements and one nonriparian- wetland requirement. The
MOA program has one stream mitigation requirement, one riparian- wetland
mitigation requirement and one nonriparian- wetland mitigation requirement in
Catawba 03. Currently all 39 stream mitigation requirements for both the MOU
and MOA programs have been fully met. There are a total of 15 wetland
requirements ( 13 riparian wetlands and 2 nonriparian wetlands) for the MOU and
MOA programs which total 25.06 wetland credits. Currently 12, of the wetland
requirements are fully met, one is partially met and two are unmet. Of the total
25.06 wetland- mitigation credits required, EEP has fulfilled 21.735 wetland
credits, an increase from the 18.573 wetland credits fulfilled at the end of last
quarter.
CU Immediate Action Plan:
The lower Catawba CU is a chronic problem and critical watershed for
implementing stream- and wetland- mitigation projects due to the urban nature of
the CU, local and federal laws and flooding concerns. Also, there is very little
opportunity for high- quality wetland projects. Recognizing the limitations and
chronic issues associated within the Catawba 03050103 watershed, the Program
Assessment and Consistency Group ( PACG) passed mitigation guidance that
allows the use of mitigation assets in Catawba 03050102 and the lower portion of
Catawba 03050101 ( falling within or partially within the Southern Outer
Piedmont Ecoregion) to be used to offset mitigation needs in Catawba 03050103
for either the MOU and MOA programs. The new policy will require a 50-
percent penalty ratio when being used to address permit requirements in effect
prior to the issuance of the policy. There will be no penalty applied to EEP when
addressing mitigation requirements that became effective after the issuance of the
policy. EEP will advise USACE and DWQ that mitigation required for impacts in
this CU could be accomplished in Catawba 03050103 or within either Catawba
03050102 or the lower Catawba 03050101, and then it will be the decision of
those regulatory agencies if additional mitigation credits are warranted for
mitigation provided out of the CU.
To achieve the remaining outstanding mitigation requirements, EEP is actively
pursuing a number of traditional and alternative strategies:
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report Oct. 1, 2008 – Dec. 31, 2008 20
1. WPPI initiated a survey of Catawba 03030102 for additional wetland
restoration opportunities. There are several potential projects in
development that could be utilized toward meeting the wetland
requirements.
2. EEP issued a FD RFP for 5,000 stream credits, 10 riparian wetland
credits and five nonriparian- wetland credits in the expanded Catawba
03050103 service area. The technical proposals were received on
Aug. 18, 2008 and EEP is currently in the process of evaluating the
submittals. EEP anticipates contracts for suitable, viable project( s)
resulting from this FD RFP will be signed by the end of this current
fiscal year. If no suitable viable project( s) are identified from the FD
RFP submittals, then EEP will re- evaluate the strategy to delivery the
stream and wetland mitigation.
3. Potential implementation of nontraditional projects based on the
Charlotte LWP Initiative. Numerous sites identified through this
planning effort have yielded nontraditional wetland- and stream-mitigation
opportunities. EEP has presented these projects to the
PACG and is awaiting approval of the methodology to calculate
mitigation credits before proceeding with these projects. In the fall of
2006, the Non- Traditional Mitigation Steering Committee modified
the EEP’s functional/ credit methodology based on the PACG and the
PACG- Technical Committee’s previous comments. The PACG- TC
requested additional information associated with historical permits.
Unfortunately, these permit files had been relocated out- of- state to be
scanned and only became available recently. The results of the newly
incorporated data are expected to be presented to the PACG and
PACG- TC soon. Since so much time has passed since the beginning
of this process, the previously identified projects may no longer be
available for implementation.
4. Evaluation of the CU for wetlands preservation opportunities that may
be able to provide some mitigation credit towards the wetland deficits.
WPPI has identified multiple preservation sites and is directing local
watershed planning to identify, assess and acquire these sites. Three
projects have been identified that will yield 14.5 mitigation credits.
5. Use existing assets or generate new assets in the lower portion of
Catawba 03050101 for the MOU Program. EEP has approval from
USACE ( reference letter May 21, 2004 from Ken Jolly to Bill
Gilmore) to use wetlands assets in the lower portion of Catawba
03050101 to offset these deficits.
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report Oct. 1, 2008 – Dec. 31, 2008 21
6. Use existing assets or generate new assets in Catawba 03050102 and
the lower portion of Catawba 03050101 per the PACG guidance issued
on Sept. 12, 2006. Existing wetlands in Catawba 03050102 have been
utilized, save for wetlands that have been earmarked to offset
additional mitigation needs that may be necessary to meet NCDOT
permit shortfalls associated with the NCDOT Little Sugar mitigation
project. EEP is awaiting transfer of mitigation permit responsibility to
EEP prior to utilizing these remaining credits to mitigate for these pre-
EEP mitigation shortfalls.
7. Evaluation of wetlands restoration on Chewacla soils. EEP has
discussed with USACE the possibility of pursuing wetlands restoration
sites with Chewacla soil types in association with priority one stream-restoration
opportunities. Additional potential wetland opportunities
have been identified on the Pott Creek II and South Fork mitigation
sites. The feasibility of this potential is currently being evaluated.
8. Utilize HQP assets generated in the MOA program to offset riparian
wetland restoration equivalent needs for the MOU program. PACG
and NCDOT authorization is needed to allow for these credits to be
sold and used by the MOU program.
CHOWAN 03010204
Outstanding Mitigation Required
Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent
Stream 0 0
Riparian 0 0
Non- riparian 0.122 0.122
Coastal Marsh 0 0
Background:
The Chowan River basin has historically had little activity for the EEP’s
mitigation programs. Only two payments have ever been made in the river basin
in the history of the program. The requirements total 0.244 nonriparian- wetland
mitigation credits.
CU Immediate Action Plan:
WPPI has been assigned to identify a non- riparian wetland mitigation project
suitable to meet the current and long- term mitigation needs in this watershed.
Unfortunately, because of excessive surplus located in the Pasquotank River
basin, the WPPI initiative has been placed on hold pending the discussions
between the regulatory agencies, NCDENR and NCDOT regarding the potential
use of these credits to meet permit needs in the Chowan River basin. More than
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report Oct. 1, 2008 – Dec. 31, 2008 22
1,110 non- riparian wetland mitigation surplus credits exist in the Pasquotank
River basin that could be used to offset mitigation needs.
CU Long- Range Action Plan:
Long- range needs in this watershed are projected to be 5.00 nonriparian- wetland
mitigation credits. WPPI has been assigned to identify and implement projects
sufficient to meet long- term needs. As stated above, this initiative is currently on
hold pending the outcome of the interagency surplus- asset discussions.
FRENCH BROAD 06010105
Outstanding Mitigation Required
Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent
Stream 0 0
Riparian 0 0
Non- riparian 0.16 0
Coastal Marsh 0 0
Background:
French Broad 06010105 has had some stream and/ or riparian wetland mitigation
requirements almost every year since the start of WRP; however, this is the first
non- riparian wetland mitigation requirement received for this CU. The mitigation
requirements through December 31, 2008 total 13,144 stream mitigation credits,
6.607 riparian wetland mitigation credits, and 0.16 non- riparian wetland
mitigation credits.
CU Immediate Action Plan:
WPPI was assigned to identify a nonriparian- wetland mitigation project suitable
to meet the current and any projected long- term mitigation needs in this
watershed. However, there is no projected nonriparian- wetland mitigation need
for either the MOA or MOU programs. Based on current information for this CU,
there is a small riparian- wetland surplus in the MOA program. EEP plans to
petition the PACG to allow the utilization of the small impacts policy as
referenced in the Tri- Party MOA Amendment Number 2, Section E dated March
8, 2007. EEP will make a request to the PACG to utilize existing riparian wetland
credits located within the same CU as the permitted nonriparian- wetland impacts.
CU Long- Range Action Plan:
There are no long range needs in this watershed at this time.
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report Oct. 1, 2008 – Dec. 31, 2008 23
FRENCH BROAD 06010108
Outstanding Mitigation Required
Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent
Stream 0 0
Riparian 0 0
Non- riparian 0.15 0
Coastal Marsh 0 0
Background:
French Broad 06010108 has had no activity for any of EEP’s mitigation programs
until this year. The issued permit and mitigation requirements associated with the
outstanding mitigation requirement included mitigation requirements for stream,
riparian wetland, and nonriparian- wetland impacts. This is the same permit
associated with the outstanding nonriparian- wetland mitigation requirement in
French Broad 06010105.
CU Immediate Action Plan:
WPPI was assigned to identify a nonriparian- wetland mitigation project suitable
to meet the current and any projected long- term mitigation needs in this
watershed. However, there is no projected nonriparian- wetland mitigation need
for either the MOA or MOU programs. Based on current information for this CU,
there is a small riparian- wetland surplus in the MOA program and no needs in the
MOU program. EEP plans to petition the PACG to allow the utilization of the
small impacts policy as referenced in the Tri- Party MOA Amendment Number 2,
Section E dated March 8, 2007. EEP will make a request to the PACG to utilize
existing riparian- wetland credits located within the same CU as nonriparian-wetland
impacts are permitted.
CU Long- Range Action Plan:
There are no long range needs in this watershed at this time.
HIWASSEE 06020002
Outstanding Mitigation Required
Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent
Stream 0 0
Riparian 0 0
Non- riparian 0.066 0
Coastal Marsh 0 0
Background:
The Hiwassee River basin has had little activity for the EEP’s mitigation
programs. Only one payment has been made in the river basin in the history of
the MOU program and only two projects permitted, with three mitigation
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report Oct. 1, 2008 – Dec. 31, 2008 24
requirements in the MOA program. Although the number of issued permits is
small, the associated mitigation requirements total 12,259 stream mitigation
credits and 1.64 riparian- wetland mitigation credits for the EEP’s mitigation
programs. This is the first nonriparian- wetland mitigation requirement received
for this CU.
CU Immediate Action Plan:
WPPI has been active in the CU searching for suitable stream and riparian-wetland
mitigation sites to meet the previous noncompliant stream and riparian-wetland
mitigation requirements, and the projected stream and riparian- wetland
mitigation needs. However, there is no future projected nonriparian- wetland need
for either the MOA or MOU programs. Based on current information for the
Hiwassee river basin, EEP will have a small surplus of approximately 1 riparian-wetland
mitigation credit after accounting for future MOA program needs and
current requirements for the MOU program. EEP plans to petition the PACG to
allow the utilization of the small impacts policy as referenced in the Tri- Party
MOA Amendment Number 2, Section E dated March 8, 2007. EEP will make a
request to the PACG to utilize existing riparian- wetland credits located within the
same CU as nonriparian- wetland impacts are permitted.
CU Long- Range Action Plan:
There are no long range needs in this watershed at this time.
LITTLE TENNESSEE 06010203
Outstanding Mitigation Required
Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent
Stream 288 ( cool); 802 ( cold) 0
Riparian 0 0
Non- riparian 0 0
Coastal Marsh 0 0
Background:
This CU has historically had little activity. Prior to this quarter, EEP only had
one permit requirement in this CU for 288 cool stream credits, and this permit
requirement had previously been met by the Frizell FD Project. The Frizell
mitigation project was dropped after the discovery of an Indian burial ground and
the determination that a Phase 3 excavation would be required in order to
implement the project. A second stream mitigation requirement for cold stream
credits became due this quarter.
CU Immediate Action Plan:
WPPI has been assigned the task of identifying a stream project designed to meet
the stream mitigation needs in this CU. The project manager has made contact
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report Oct. 1, 2008 – Dec. 31, 2008 25
with DWCD, NRCS, and multiple landowners with little success. WPPI is
continuing to make landowner contacts in this CU to locate suitable stream-mitigation
project( s) to meet the outstanding requirements.
CU Long- Range Action Plan:
There are no large long- range stream or wetland needs in this watershed at this
time, with the exception of the two outstanding mitigation requirements listed
above. There is potential for additional stream- mitigation needs required in the
MOA program, but insufficient amount to warrant issuance of a FD RFP.
LUMBER 03040203
Outstanding Mitigation Required
Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent
Stream 9,318 ( warm) 0
Riparian 0 0
Non- riparian 0 0
Coastal Marsh 0 0
Background:
Two projects in this watershed were dropped several months ago resulting in
outstanding stream mitigation needs: Middle Swamp Creek and Black Gum
Creek.
Middle Swamp Creek was a very large stream restoration located in the coastal
plain. The design and permitting process for this project had been difficult but
permits had been acquired for implementation of the project. However, a decision
was made to terminate this project based on information from the February 2007
Coastal Issues Forum, resulting in a change in coastal stream- restoration guidance
from the USACE, and in the overall complexity of this project. The project
would have resulted in the removal of some forested riparian areas, as well as the
establishment of some stream channels in locations where it was difficult to
determine if stream channels had historically existed. Black Gum Creek was also
a very large stream mitigation project that had been secured via the FD RFP
process. The project was intended to produce 10,000 warm stream credits. The
full- delivery provider was unable to implement the project due to the new coastal
stream- restoration guidance. The decisions to drop these projects ( and replace
them with other projects) reflect joint collaborative efforts on the part of EEP and
the regulatory agencies to continue to improve the type and quality of stream-restoration
efforts in the coastal plain.
CU Action Plan:
WPPI has identified one project with 1,716 stream credits and is attempting to
secure the project. EEP issued a FD RFP for 20,000 stream credits. The technical
proposals were received on Aug. 18, 2008 and EEP is currently in the process of
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report Oct. 1, 2008 – Dec. 31, 2008 26
evaluating the submittals. EEP has placed acquisition of the identified project on
hold until the evaluation of the FD RFP technical proposal( s) is complete. EEP
anticipates contracts for suitable, viable project( s) resulting from this FD RFP will
be signed by the end of the current fiscal year. If no suitable viable project( s) are
identified from the FD RFP submittals, then EEP will re- evaluate the strategy to
deliver the stream mitigation.
EEP has learned that some on- site stream mitigation credits were developed for a
TIP project for which EEP committed to provide the mitigation. Once the permit
modifications are issued that change the mitigation strategy for this project, then
EEP will make appropriate adjustments to current stream- mitigation debits, re-calculate
the total stream- mitigation needs for this CU, and revise the non-compliant
mitigation requirement. It is anticipated that the current stream
mitigation noncompliance will decrease and will be reflected in the next quarterly
report.
LUMBER 03040206
Outstanding Mitigation Required
Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent
Stream 0 0
Riparian 0.14 0
Non- riparian 1.633 0.521
Coastal Marsh 0 0
Background:
The Lumber 03040206 CU has seen limited activity since the inception of the
WRP. To date, EEP is responsible for one stream mitigation requirements, one
riparian- wetland mitigation requirement and five nonriparian- wetland
requirements. The magnitude of all seven requirements is relatively small in
comparison to other areas of this river basin. One of the five nonriparian- wetland
requirements due is being partially met and the stream requirement was fully
covered. One nonriparian- wetland requirement in this CU is covered with a
riparian wetland asset.
CU Action Plan:
Due to low activity in this CU in the MOA program and no new activity for the
MOU program, EEP has not initiated a full LWP, and the amount of current and
anticipated future impacts does not warrant initiating that action. EEP has
identified one potential mitigation site in the CU. The credits generated by the
site are sufficient to meet current and future needs for both the MOU and MOA
programs.
LUMBER 03040207
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report Oct. 1, 2008 – Dec. 31, 2008 27
Outstanding Mitigation Required
Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent
Stream 15 ( warm) 0
Riparian 0.026 0
Non- riparian 0 0
Coastal Marsh 0 0
Background:
Lumber 03040207 currently has shortfalls of 15 stream credits and 0.026 riparian
wetland restoration credits to meet current regulatory requirements.
CU Immediate Action Plan:
WPPI has been assigned to identify and implement a stream project that generates
a minimum of 594 stream credits and 4.53 riparian wetland credits. These
amounts represent the total needed to meet current outstanding needs plus all
future projected needs, within the CU for the current TIP.
NEUSE 03020201
Outstanding Mitigation Required
Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent
Stream 480.80 135
Riparian 0 0
Non- riparian 0 0
Coastal Marsh 0 0
Background:
Neuse 03020201 is a high demand CU for stream and wetland mitigation needs.
Currently all of the wetland- mitigation requirements are completely covered.
EEP currently has a total of 218 stream- and wetland- mitigation requirements, of
which 106 are stream- mitigation requirements. Of the stream requirements, all
are met with the exception of three, one of which is partially met.
CU Immediate Action Plan:
WPPI has been assigned responsibility for procuring the stream mitigation for the
immediate and future needs in this cataloging unit.
TAR- PAMLICO 03020104
Outstanding Mitigation Required
Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent
Stream 2,244 ( warm) 4,244 ( warm)
Riparian 0 0
Non- riparian 0 0
Coastal Marsh 0 0
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report Oct. 1, 2008 – Dec. 31, 2008 28
Background:
The Acre Swamp project in this watershed was dropped during the Quarter 3 of
the 2007- 2008 state fiscal year, resulting in an outstanding stream mitigation
need. Acre Swamp was a large stream- and riparian- wetland restoration project
based on Rosgen techniques. The regulatory agencies expressed concerns with
utilizing traditional stream restoration techniques in the coastal plain and issued
an information paper titled “ Information Regarding Stream Restoration – With
Emphases on the Coastal Plain.” The full- delivery provider was unable to
implement the project due to the new coastal- stream restoration guidance. The
decision to drop this project ( and replace with other project( s)) reflects the joint
collaborative efforts on the part of EEP and the regulatory agencies to continue to
improve the type and quality of stream- restoration efforts in the coastal plain.
CU Action Plan:
EEP has issued a FD RFP for 10,000 stream credits. The technical proposals
were received on Aug. 18, 2008 and EEP is currently in the process of evaluating
the submittals. EEP anticipates contracts for suitable, viable project( s) resulting
from this FD RFP will be signed by the end of the current fiscal year. If no
suitable viable project( s) are identified from the FD RFP submittals, then EEP
will re- evaluate the strategy to deliver the stream mitigation.
.
TAR- PAMLICO 03020105
Outstanding Mitigation Required
Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent
Stream 145.6 0
Riparian 0 0
Non- riparian 0 0
Coastal Marsh 0.10 0.10
Background:
The Tar- Pamlico 03020105 CU has seen virtually no activity since the inception
of the WRP. Prior to 2006, the MOU program had only accepted one
conservation easement as mitigation on behalf of USACE. However, recent
activity has been very high. EEP has received payments for three riparian
wetland requirements, 22 nonriparian- wetland requirements and one coastal
marsh requirement during the last three years and are due. Although activity has
been high, the magnitude is very small. The MOU program currently has one
small coastal- marsh wetland requirement ( 0.2 coastal marsh credits) that is unmet.
The MOA program has one small stream requirement associated with one permit
that is due. The permit’s nonriparian- wetland mitigation needs are fully covered.
The permit’s stream requirement is currently covered with 10: 1 HQP assets, but
the remaining restoration requirement ( 146 stream restoration credits) is
outstanding.
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report Oct. 1, 2008 – Dec. 31, 2008 29
CU Action Plan:
The primary plan for this CU had been to utilize the FD RFP process to meet
current and future stream needs. EEP had received one FDP project that was not
accepted during the fourth quarter of 2006- 2007. EEP has issued a FD RFP for
4,000 stream credits. The technical proposals were received on Aug. 18, 2008
and EEP is currently in the process of evaluating the submittals. EEP anticipates
contracts for suitable, viable project( s) resulting from this FD RFP will be signed
by the end of the current fiscal year. If no suitable viable project( s) are identified
from the FD RFP submittals, then EEP will re- evaluate the strategy to deliver the
stream mitigation. Also, WPPI was assigned to procure the remaining coastal
marsh mitigation needs. EEP has already secured sufficient riparian- wetland and
non- riparian wetland mitigation to offset all projected riparian- wetland and
nonriparian- wetland mitigation needs for the seven- year TIP, and has ceased
procurement for additional riparian- wetland and nonriparian- wetland mitigation
until new mitigation needs are identified.
Note: The Bonner Bridge project ( TIP B- 2500) is a future MOA projected
coastal- marsh impact that will be mitigated by NCDOT using the project- by-project
approach using existing coastal- marsh restoration credits located in the
adjacent CU. EEP has transferred these credits to the NCDOT for utilization on
this project.
WHITE OAK 03030001
Outstanding Mitigation Required
Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent
Stream 0 0
Riparian 0 0
Non- riparian 1.14 0.379
Coastal Marsh 0 0
Background:
EEP currently has significant amounts of unused non- riparian wetland mitigation
credits in White Oak 03030001 originating from the Hoffman Forest Mitigation
Bank. Unfortunately, the Hoffman Forest Mitigation Bank has a service area
restricted to impacts located only within Onslow County.
CU Action Plan:
WPPI was assigned to identify and acquire approximately three non- riparian
wetland credits to address the unmet requirements, requirements covered by
riparian wetland or coastal marsh wetland mitigation, and new recently paid
requirements not yet due. Additional non- riparian wetland credits may need to
be pursued if additional credits are not released from the Hoffman Forest
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report Oct. 1, 2008 – Dec. 31, 2008 30
Mitigation Bank. EEP has received a large payment for nonriparian- wetland
mitigation and the impact is located in Onslow County. EEP has purchased some
credits from the Hoffman Forest Mitigation Bank but not enough to meet all
current and future requirements in this CU. To address the current and projected
future nonriparian- wetland needs that are located outside of Onslow County, EEP
is continuing to make landowner contacts from potential sites identified in the
White Oak LWP. The White Oak LWP also contains opportunities to pursue
nontraditional forms of mitigation that may be appropriate for this watershed.
Additional discussions to pursue the nontraditional forms of mitigation between
the EEP and PACG may be required in the near future, as the traditional
mitigation opportunities are dwindling.
YADKIN 03040105
Outstanding Mitigation Required
Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent
Stream 0 0
Riparian 0.331 0
Non- riparian 0.66 0.66
Coastal Marsh 0 0
Background:
Yadkin 03040105 is similar in some ways to Catawba 03050103. Yadkin
03040105 does not have many wetlands- restoration opportunities present within
the CU. It is also experiencing some of the same development pressures that are
present in the lower Catawba. Yadkin 03040105 includes portions of Charlotte,
Huntersville, Mooresville, Davidson, Concord, Kannapolis, Monroe, Mint Hill
and other smaller towns. It should be considered a CU of concern for future
wetlands- restoration efforts. Yadkin 0304105 is different than the lower Catawba
in that it has more rural landscape remaining within the watershed and is larger.
EEP has invested heavily in local watershed planning in the Yadkin 0304105 and
expects to generate both stream and wetlands projects from these endeavors in the
future. Because of the magnitude of mitigation needs projected in this CU, EEP
has also used the full- delivery process to secure mitigation.
During this quarter, information related to one mitigation project was better
refined, which resulted in a change of the wetland mitigation type. The original
data associated with the Suther mitigation site suggested that the site would
deliver non- riparian wetland mitigation; however, the restoration plan confirmed
that the site would provide riparian non- riverine wetland mitigation. This change
negatively affected all nonriparian- wetland mitigation requirements/ debits in this
cataloging unit that were previously shown as compliant but increased the
riparian- wetland mitigation compliance. The change in the wetland- mitigation
type of this project has increased overall wetland- mitigation compliance in this
CU.
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report Oct. 1, 2008 – Dec. 31, 2008 31
CU Action Plan:
Historically, the action plan in this CU included the significant use of the full-delivery
process to secure stream- and wetland- mitigation needs due to the
extreme magnitude of need. These efforts have been very successful in
generating stream restoration, but not wetland restoration. The last set of FD RFP
had submittals containing five ( 5.0) riparian wetland credits and 0.5 non- riparian
wetland credits that were not awarded due to high costs.
To develop mitigation assets in Yadkin 05, EEP is using a multi- pronged
approach. EEP has expanded the Rocky River LWP to Phase IV; plans to acquire
and implement existing Tier II and III projects; will identify and implement using
the Design- Bid- Build ( DBB) process for at least four additional stream-restoration
projects, two riparian- wetland projects and one non- riparian wetland
project; and will maximize use of existing HQP credits. An LWP was initiated in
the Goose Creek watershed in partnership with resource agencies and local
governments in the area to generate mitigation opportunities that will also address
endangered- species issues. The EEP Monitoring section is also investigating
whether the Cato project produced riparian- wetland or nonriparian- wetland
credits as a component of the priority one stream- restoration project. Finally,
EEP has issued a FD RFP for 15,000 stream credits and 18.75 riparian wetland
credits. The technical proposals were received on Aug. 18, 2008 and EEP is
currently in the process of evaluating the submittals. EEP anticipates contracts
for suitable, viable project( s) resulting from this FD RFP will be signed by the
end of the current fiscal year. If no suitable viable project( s) are identified from
the FD RFP submittals, then EEP will re- evaluate the strategy to deliver the
stream mitigation.
YADKIN 03040201
Outstanding Mitigation Required
Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent
Stream 0 0
Riparian 0 0
Non- riparian 0.13 0
Coastal Marsh 0 0
Background:
Yadkin 03040201 CU has seen some activity since the inception of the WRP;
however, the last payment received under the MOU program was in 2005. EEP
has eight MOU requirements and three MOA requirements in this CU, consisting
of three riparian- wetlands, three nonriparian- wetlands, and five stream
requirements. Currently, 10 of the 11 mitigation requirements have been met that
include 1,059 stream credits and 6.87 wetland credits.
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report Oct. 1, 2008 – Dec. 31, 2008 32
There are future projected mitigation needs for both stream and wetland ( riparian
and nonriparian) credits. EEP currently has sufficient stream- and riparian-wetland
mitigation credits to meet those needs; however, there are no nonriparian-wetland
mitigation assets available in this CU. EEP and NCDOT are discussing
some of the projected nonriparian- wetland mitigation impacts submitted in
February 2008 to determine if the impacts are in fact nonriparian- wetlands.
Based on the characteristics of this CU, it is highly probable that most of the
current projected nonriparian- wetland impacts are actually riparian wetlands.
EEP has placed on hold procurement of the long term future nonriparian- wetland
mitigation until this issue is resolved.
CU Immediate Action Plan:
WPPI was assigned responsibility for procuring 2.54 Restoration ( R) and 2.54
Restoration Equivalent ( RE) type nonriparian- wetland mitigation credits to meet
immediate outstanding requirements.
CU Long- Range Action Plan:
EEP plans to issue an FD RFP for nonriparian- wetland mitigation credits for the
long- term needs within the CU. The magnitude of the request will be based
primarily on projected long- term NCDOT nonriparian- wetland mitigation needs.
The FD RFP will not be issued until the immediate issue related to the
nonriparian- wetland projection is resolved.
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report Oct. 1, 2008 – Dec. 31, 2008 33
Appendix A: EEP Tier 1 Stream and Wetland Restoration, Enhancement, Creation and Preservation Sites - Gross Asset Project List - Alphabetically ( High Quality Preservation
sites are not listed in table below)
GIS ID
Project Name
Tier
River Basin
8- digit CU
Stream Restoration
Stream Enhancment I
Stream Enhancement II
Stream Preservation
Riparian Restoration
Riparian Creation
Riparian Enhancement
Riparian Preservation
Nonriparian Restoration
Nonriparian Creation
Nonriparian Enhancement
Nonriparian Preservation
Coastal Marsh Restoration
Coastal Marsh Creation
Coastal Marsh Enhancement
Coastal Marsh Preservation
Stream Buffer
92546 601 North Property 1 YADKIN 03040105 3,000
92545 601 West Property 1 YADKIN 03040105 4,500
9 Abbott 1 NEUSE 03020201 584
6 ABC 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020104 2,375 101.63 9.24 27.57 10.90
92244 Adam's Creek Sea Gate Woods 1na NEUSE 03020204 122.00
7 Adkins Branch ( Phase II) 1 NEUSE 03020202 10,137 40.00
10 Afton Run 1 YADKIN 03040105 261
92526 Anderson Swamp 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020102 12.00 7.00
92487 Armstrong Property 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020104 2,000 20.00 4.50
17 Back Creek 1 YADKIN 03040105 2,167 1,480 0.30 3.50
92666 Badin Inn 1 YADKIN 03040104 4,050
19 Bailey Fork ( EBX) 1 CATAWBA 03050101 6,017 9,765 11.80 5.30 12.60
20 Bailey Fork II ( WRC) 1 CATAWBA 03050101 5,500 9.50
21 Ballance Farm 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 196.30 48.65 19.77 50.00
22 Barbara Squires Site 1 CAPE FEAR 03030005
23 Barra Farms I 1 CAPE FEAR 03030006 160.51
24 Beamon's Run n/ a NEUSE 03020203
25 Bear Creek 1 NEUSE 03020202 84.06 34.00 280.30
26 Bear Creek ( Phillips Tract) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 4,143
27 Bear Swamp Creek 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020101 1,460
28 Beaver Creek 1 YADKIN 03040101 4,266
92217 Beaverdam Creek 1 CATAWBA 03050101 12,427 567 2,603
92586 Beaverdam Creek and Trib ( Parker Site) 1 YADKIN 03040105 2,933
92530 Beaverdam Swamp 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 10,200 9.00
29 Benbow Park 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 1,122 780
32 Benson Grove 1 NEUSE 03020201 0.00 0.00
33 Bethel Church 1 YADKIN 03040101
92532 Big Cedar Creek 1 YADKIN 03040105 11,088 1,090 580
739 Big Harris Creek I 1 BROAD 03050105 24,486 9,208 608 590 2.00
92715 Big Warrior & Little Warrior Creek 1 YADKIN 03040101 50
36 Billy's Creek 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020101 1,901 200 2.60
38 Bishop Road 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020104 1.20 61.60 60.70 38.60 320.40 0.30 189.60
92516 Blockhouse Creek 1 BROAD 03050105 4,450 1,410 800 5.00
92210 Blounts Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 8,000
40 Blue Mitigation Site 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 4,200 112.43
92879 Bobs Creek 1 CATAWBA 03050101 1,423 7,235 1.50
731 Bogue Sound ( Weeks Property) 1 WHITE OAK 03020106 0.18
439 Bold Run Creek 1 NEUSE 03020201 1,454 176 27.10
44 Bowman Site 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 1,500 200 2.34
46 Branson Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 2,200
47 Briles 1 YADKIN 03040103 1,446 1,182 1.00
92333 Brock 1 NEUSE 03020204 397 0.50 5.66
49 Brock Mill Pond 1 NEUSE 03020204 3,400 109.00
52 Brown Bark Park 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 775 2,059
53 Brown Branch 1 CATAWBA 03050101 5,107 120
92207 Brown Farm 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 24.58 3.32
92517 Brown Marsh Swamp 1 LUMBER 03040204 5,000 5.00
54 Brush Creek 1 NEW 05050001 1,350 490 1,750
55 Brushy Fork 1 YADKIN 03040101 4,400 3,000
92603 Buffalo Creek 1 NEUSE 03020201 6,100
56 Bugaboo Creek 1 YADKIN 03040101 6,230
57 Bull Farm 1 CAPE FEAR 03030006 2.18
58 Burnt Mill Creek 1na CAPE FEAR 03030007 0.80
60 Bush Island 1 LUMBER 03040203 300.00
63 Caldwell Station/ Foley/ EcoPark 1 CATAWBA 03050101 3,600 420 1.60 5.00
66 Camp Lejune USMC 1 WHITE OAK 03030001 - 0.57 0.00
92521 Cane Creek 1 BROAD 03050105 4,470 4,860 1,670 4.40 5.00
69 Cane Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 2,277 6.90
92325 Cane Creek 1 ROANOKE 03010104 12,720 1,232 3,499 463
92268 Carbonton Dam 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 90,494
70 Casey Tract 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205
71 Cat Creek 1 LITTLE TENNESSEE 06010202 4,358 1,082 1,490 6.00
72 Cato 1 YADKIN 03040105 2,295
73 Caviness 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 752 11.00
77 Chapel Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 1,000 400
79 Charles Creek 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 1.16 0.60
87 Chavis Park 1 NEUSE 03020201 2,210 2.30
90 City Pond 1 YADKIN 03040201 10,667
92762 Clarks Creek 1 YADKIN 03040104 7,844
91 Clayhill Farm 1 WHITE OAK 03020106 9,599 2,010 21.60 1.80 3.90 79.90 52.00 110.50
92 Clear Creek 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 1,200
93 Cleghorn Creek 1 BROAD 03050105 5,167
94 Coddle Creek Tributary ( Indian Run) 1 YADKIN 03040105 1,922 1,808
742 Collington Cut 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205
92205 Collins Site 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 9,786 1,070 750
92730 Columbus Swamp 1 LUMBER 03040203 32.00
96 Company Swamp 1 ROANOKE 03010107 557.43
92226 Conoconnara Swamp 1 ROANOKE 03010107 5,000 69.00 8.00 71.00
97 Corbett Tract 1 CAPE FEAR 03030007
101 Cox Property 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020104 0.00
99 Cox Site 1 NEUSE 03020201 7,292 308 42 26.80 16.90 25.20
104 Croatan Mitigation Bank Phase II 1 NEUSE 03020204 49.60 91.60 37.80 1066.22 956.90 253.00
103 Croatan Wetland Mitigation Bank I 1 NEUSE 03020204 92.00 311.60 1026.90 108.00 0.00
105 Cross Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 2,400
92329 Crowns West 1 WHITE OAK 03030001 3,800
92547 Cutatwhiskie creek 1 CHOWAN 03010204 2,818 2,786 12.30
106 Dale Tract 1 CAPE FEAR 03030005 126.30 17.90
92269 Daniels Farm # 1 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020101 31.70
92229 Daniels Farm # 2 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020101 13.70 4.50 10.30 0.70 0.70 0.11
Beginning Balance
Updated 12/ 31/ 2008
Appendix A: EEP Tier 1 Stream and Wetland Restoration, Enhancement, Creation and Preservation Sites - Gross Asset Project List - Alphabetically ( High Quality Preservation
sites are not listed in table below)
GIS ID
Project Name
Tier
River Basin
8- digit CU
Stream Restoration
Stream Enhancment I
Stream Enhancement II
Stream Preservation
Riparian Restoration
Riparian Creation
Riparian Enhancement
Riparian Preservation
Nonriparian Restoration
Nonriparian Creation
Nonriparian Enhancement
Nonriparian Preservation
Coastal Marsh Restoration
Coastal Marsh Creation
Coastal Marsh Enhancement
Coastal Marsh Preservation
Stream Buffer
Beginning Balance
92543 Davis Branch 1 YADKIN 03040105 2,252 1,229 396 766
110 Deaton 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 255 13.70
111 Deep Creek ( Harding) 1 YADKIN 03040101 5,500 30.40 12.10
117 Dismal Swamp 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 15.46 20.80 252.78 91.00
118 Dismal Swamp ( aka Timberlake Farm) 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 180.00 275.00
92533 Dog Bite Creek 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010108 2,410 1,235 80
119 Dowd Dairy 1 CAPE FEAR 03030005 4.85 542.89
92544 Duke Swamp 1 CHOWAN 03010203 5,000 15.00
65 Dula Thorofare 1 YADKIN 03040105 2,313 945 6,563 5.20
92350 Dula Thorofare @ Bishop Site 1 YADKIN 03040104 2,730 1,871 480 6,355 3.10 1.00 2.30
121 Dutchman's Creek 1 NEUSE 03020201
122 Dye Branch I Stormwater BMP 1na YADKIN 03040105
92255 Dye Branch II Stream Restoration 1 YADKIN 03040105 3,000
745 Eagle Brunswick 1 CAPE FEAR 03030005
92763 East Buffalo Creek 1 LITTLE TENNESSEE 06010204 980 2,690 6,250
123 East Tarboro Canal 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020103 2,989 1,876 8.27
125 Elizabeth City State BMP 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205
92665 Elk Branch 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010108 3,075 2,540
126 Elk Shoals RFP* 1 CATAWBA 03050101 4,813 563 5.30
127 Ellerbee Creek 1 NEUSE 03020201 6,279 12.00
92520 Ellington Branch 1 ROANOKE 03010106 5,000
128 Ephemeral Pool 1 LUMBER 03040203
92552 Farrar Dairy 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 11,531 800 150 33.30 39.90 43.20
133 Finley- McMillan 1 CAPE FEAR 03030007 398.00
135 Fisher River Mit. Bank ( Ring FDP) 1 YADKIN 03040101 2,376 25.50 8.10 0.91
92185 Five Mile Branch 1 YADKIN 03040102 17,595 4.00 4.00
138 Fletcher- Meritor site 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 4,000 10.00
92812 Flint Rock Farm # 2 1 Cape Fear 03030002 3,200 12.00
440 Flintrock Farm 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 3,000 30.00
92486 Floogie Site 1 ROANOKE 03010107 10,251 25.00
139 Forest Hills 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 2,960
141 Freedom Park 1 CATAWBA 03050103 4,400
142 Friedburg Marsh 1 YADKIN 03040101
92228 Gatlin Swamp 1 ROANOKE 03010107 125.00
143 Gibson Pond 1 YADKIN 03040201 36.70
144 Gillespie Golf Course 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 2,709 3,086
854 Glade Creek 1 NEW 05050001 2,705 125 813 0.33
92343 Glade Creek II 1 NEW 05050001 2,100 0.50 1.30
92206 Glen Raven 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 3,290 700
145 Goldsboro Housing Authority 1 NEUSE 03020201 2,100 3.54
92761 Goodman Property 1 NEUSE 03020202 4,325 3,205
147 Goose Creek 1 NEUSE 03020201 1,800 3.00
92710 Goose Creek ( Earl Haigler) 1 YADKIN 03040105
92709 Goose Creek ( Greene site) 1 YADKIN 03040105 783
148 Goshen Swamp 1 CAPE FEAR 03030007
92219 Gray Farm 1 CATAWBA 03050101 7,610 15.70
151 Great Dismal Swamp 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 553.00
671 Greenbriar Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 4,937 6,330 7.64 17.00
153 Gregory 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020102 6,500 75.00
155 Grimesland ( Phase II) 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020103 48.80
156 Grimesland Site ( Phase I) 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020103 7.80 348.00
158 Grove Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030007 6.00 10.20 352.00 3.90 7.60
716 Gurley 1 NEUSE 03020203
162 Hall Branch 1 YADKIN 03040201 2,000 2.50
163 Hammock's State Park 1 WHITE OAK 03020106 0.30 0.00
165 Hanging Rock Creek 1 WATAUGA 06010103 2,767 279
92230 Harrell Site 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020101 6,987 15.00 18.90
167 Haw Branch 1 CAPE FEAR 03030007 10,000 25.00
92316 Haw River Bouchard 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 30.00
92238 Haw River Swamp I 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 12.00
168 Haw River Swamp II 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 14.70 2.50 18.00
169 Haw River Tract 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 80.00
719 Haw's Run 1 CAPE FEAR 03030007 6.72 25.00 171.00 49.36 99.00 11.00
170 Heath Dairy Road 1 YADKIN 03040103 6,773 1,286 852 102 1.60 0.24
172 Helms 1 YADKIN 03040105 1,400 0.40
175 High Vista 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 1,500 2,300
176 Hillcrest Bay 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 15.00
177 Hillsdale Park 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 5,302 138
92259 Hoffman Forest Bank ( MOA) 1 WHITE OAK 03030001 38.00
92258 Hoffman Forest Bank ( MOU) 1 WHITE OAK 03030001 12.00
92523 Holly Grove 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 13,350 5,940
179 Homestead ( wetland) 1 YADKIN 03040102 5,500 14.60 42.20 2.80 5.50
180 Hominy Swamp Creek 1 NEUSE 03020203 2,232 2.60
92251 Hoppers Creek - Melton Farm 1 CATAWBA 03050101 2,413 1,164 1,080 1.29 0.33
182 Horsepen Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 1.77
183 Howell Woods 1 NEUSE 03020201 5,251 34.00 4.00 64.00 38.00 5.50
184 Huskanaw Swamp 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020103 23.60
185 Indian Creek 1 CATAWBA 03050102
192 Irwin Creek Whitehurst Road 1 CATAWBA 03050103 1,500 1.50 1.04
194 Jacksonville Country Club 1 WHITE OAK 03030001 3,272 376
92550 Jarmans Oak 1 WHITE OAK 03030001 6,479 555 13.10 2.00
751 Jenny's Gut ( Perquimans Co H. S.) 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 2,500
197 Johnson Site ( Hunting Creek) 1 YADKIN 03040102 2,200
661 Johnson- Dale ( Payne Dale) 1 NEUSE 03020203 1,500 6.00
198 Jones Creek 1 YADKIN 03040201 3,068 5,150 25.00 2.70
92614 Jordan Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 8,600
199 Jumping Run Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 4,480 67.00
200 Jumping Run Creek 1 WHITE OAK 03020106 3.00
201 Juniper Bay 1 LUMBER 03040203 590.08
Updated 12/ 31/ 2008
Appendix A: EEP Tier 1 Stream and Wetland Restoration, Enhancement, Creation and Preservation Sites - Gross Asset Project List - Alphabetically ( High Quality Preservation
sites are not listed in table below)
GIS ID
Project Name
Tier
River Basin
8- digit CU
Stream Restoration
Stream Enhancment I
Stream Enhancement II
Stream Preservation
Riparian Restoration
Riparian Creation
Riparian Enhancement
Riparian Preservation
Nonriparian Restoration
Nonriparian Creation
Nonriparian Enhancement
Nonriparian Preservation
Coastal Marsh Restoration
Coastal Marsh Creation
Coastal Marsh Enhancement
Coastal Marsh Preservation
Stream Buffer
Beginning Balance
204 Ken- Cox ( Millstone Creek) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 3,300 2.00 4.55
205 Kentwood Park 1 NEUSE 03020201 1,070 350 2.90
206 Key Branch 1 YADKIN 03040104 36.80 3.60
208 Kings Creek 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 2,300
209 Knobs Creek 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 19.00
212 Lake Wheeler 1 NEUSE 03020201 0.00
92707 Laxon Creek( Racey site) 1 NEW 05050001
733 Lewis Creek 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 2,000
219 Lick Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 9,500
92372 Little Alamance Creek ( Burlington Park) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 2,850
221 Little Beaver Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 3,712 1,913 2.40 0.00
627 Little Contentnea Creek ( Farmville C. C.) 1 NEUSE 03020203 980 1,330 6.70
224 Little Grassy Creek 1 ROANOKE 03010102 2,539 12,710
92651 Little Ivy Creek ( Barnhill Site) 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 0
225 Little McQueen 1 LUMBER 03040203 0.00
856 Little Pine Creek II 1 NEW 05050001 4,000 1.25 4.00
226 Little River 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 4,400 5.00 50.00 42.00
92759 Little River Farm 1 YADKIN 03040104 12,046 2,540
228 Little Sugar Creek I 1 CATAWBA 03050103 0.00
749 Little Troublesome 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 2,188 2,754 1.90 4.50
92534 Little White Oak Creek 1 BROAD 03050105 18,200
92327 Lloyd Site 1 WHITE OAK 03030001 4,750 3.30 3.10
92515 Logan Creek 1 SAVANNAH 03060101 3,310 1,600 3,115 1.60
233 Long Swamp 1 LUMBER 03040203 0.00
234 Louisburg ( UT to Tar River) 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020101 1,937 3.05
236 Lowell Mill 1 NEUSE 03020201 34,990
237 Lower Creek 1 CATAWBA 03050101 1,921 1,440
239 Mallard Creek 1 YADKIN 03040105
715 Mann's Harbor 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205
92248 Mark's Creek TESC 1 NEUSE 03020201 3,693 17.90
92633 Martins Creek II 1 HIWASSEE 06020002 1,800 3,100 8,500 2.63 1.50 0.00
241 Mary's Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 2,096 5.40
718 Mashoe's Road 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 29.32 130.94
92328 Mason Farm 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020105 16.00 20.00
443 McCain Property 1 YADKIN 03040103 2,445
242 McDonald's Pond 1 YADKIN 03040201 2,969 770 4,410 17.70 4.20 19.00
92604 McGowan Creek 1 NEUSE 03020201 30.80
243 McIntyre Creek @ Hornets Nest Park 1 CATAWBA 03050101 4,800 1.50 17.07
244 McIntyre Property 1 CAPE FEAR 03030005 12.30 9.02 85.76
92573 McKee Creek 1 YADKIN 03040105 1,641 1,096 3,240
92351 Meadowbranch ( Fivemile Branch) 1 LUMBER 03040203 25.00 30.00
92706 Meat Camp Creek ( Miller site) 1 NEW 05050001
247 Meredell Farm Site 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 3,865 4,704 5,136 11.80
92703 Middle Fork Creek ( Phillips/ Willis) 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 0
250 Mildred Woods 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020103 128.50 8.00
251 Mill Branch 1 LUMBER 03040206 3,282 1,750 0.25 0.44 35.80 1.50
253 Mill Creek ( formerly Uwharrie Heritage) 1 YADKIN 03040103 983 4,859 15,802 1.10
255 Mineral Springs Branch ( Burnt Mill Creek) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030007 1,190 1,350
256 Mocassin Creek 1 NEUSE 03020203 311 0.38 4.93 43.21 3.00
92227 Modlin Site 1 ROANOKE 03010107 40.00
725 Moore Property 1 NEUSE 03020201 7.10 30.90 4.90 6.60
92314 Mooresville School Site - Rocky River 1 YADKIN 03040105 3,430 1.00
92527 Morgan Creek 1 BROAD 03050105 8,171 5,216 4,309
92240 Morgan Creek ( Bolin Stewardship Tract) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 4,521
92531 Morgan Creek ( French Broad) 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010106 3,483 530 0.60 0.46 0.00
258 Morgan Creek Floodplain 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 19.00
260 Mud Creek 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 15.60
737 Muddy Creek ( Randolph/ Duncan Properties) 1 CATAWBA 03050101 2,842
261 Naked Creek 1 YADKIN 03040101 3,000
92872 Neighbors Br./ Walton Crawley Br. 1 CATAWBA 03050101 2,567 3,764 3,550 2.00 3.20 0.60
264 Neu- Con MBI ( Alexander) 1 NEUSE 03020203 18.50 0.90 2.00
92642 Neu- Con MBI ( Casey- King) 1 NEUSE 03020202 25.00 0.00
265 Neu- Con MBI ( Marston) 1 NEUSE 03020204 6,416 30.00 8.60 128.50
263 Neu- Con MBI ( Nahunta) 1 NEUSE 03020203 10,670 97.50 0.50 11.50 0.40 31.50
92643 Neu- Con MBI ( Tull Wooten) 1 NEUSE 03020202 125.00 0.00
92644 Neu- Con MBI ( Valentine) 1 NEUSE 03020203 386.00 114.00
262 Neu- Con MBI ( Westbrook) 1 NEUSE 03020201 5,414 10.00 50.00 50.00 20.00
92330 New Light Creek 1 NEUSE 03020201
92497 Newfound Creek 1 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 4,825 4,394 1,356
441 Nicholls Farm ( Troublesome Creek) 1 CHOWAN 03010203 1,700 3,300 15.00 5.00 10.00
92611 North Muddy Creek 1 CATAWBA 03050101 5,014 10.50 1.25 4.30 2.40
271 North River 1na WHITE OAK 03020106 250.00
272 Northgate Park ( Ellerbe) 1 NEUSE 03020201 1,800 5.00
273 Oakley Crossroads 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020103 3,800 2.94 2.25 1.11 20.90
274 Oakwood Cemetary 1 NEUSE 03020201 1,300
92708 Obids Creek ( Wild Site) 1 NEW 05050001
275 Open Springs 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 4,520 4.70
92700 Paint Fork Creek( Brigmon Site) 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 0
92702 Paint Fork Creek( Fosson) 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 0
276 Paschal GC ( Richland Ck) 1 NEUSE 03020201 2,900 5.14
279 Payne Dairy 1 CATAWBA 03050101 5,177 470 1,350 6.40 25.40
280 Pea Island 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205
92469 Peeler Creek 1 YADKIN 03040101 2,400 1,000 1,500
281 Pembroke Creek I 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205
282 Pembroke Creek II 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 - 0.09
283 Perry Property ( UT to Pembroke Creek) 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 4,400 17.00 6.00
1 Philips 1 NEUSE 03020201
92518 Pinch Gut Tributary 1 ROANOKE 03010103 10,000
92607 Plemmons- Kirkpatrick Spring Creek WRC 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 0
Updated 12/ 31/ 2008
Appendix A: EEP Tier 1 Stream and Wetland Restoration, Enhancement, Creation and Preservation Sites - Gross Asset Project List - Alphabetically ( High Quality Preservation
sites are not listed in table below)
GIS ID
Project Name
Tier
River Basin
8- digit CU
Stream Restoration
Stream Enhancment I
Stream Enhancement II
Stream Preservation
Riparian Restoration
Riparian Creation
Riparian Enhancement
Riparian Preservation
Nonriparian Restoration
Nonriparian Creation
Nonriparian Enhancement
Nonriparian Preservation
Coastal Marsh Restoration
Coastal Marsh Creation
Coastal Marsh Enhancement
Coastal Marsh Preservation
Stream Buffer
Beginning Balance
92549 Plum Creek 1 LUMBER 03040207 80.00
285 Pott Creek 1 CATAWBA 03050102 3,500 5.45 31.32 0.76 0.36
286 Pott Creek II 1 CATAWBA 03050102 10,054
92721 Pott Creek II Wetlands 1 CATAWBA 03050102 3.81 4.28
92548 Powell Property 1 CHOWAN 03010203 3,310 70.00
289 Prestonwood G. C. 1 NEUSE 03020201 4,123 5.30
291 Price Park 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 1,776
292 Pridgen Flats 1 CAPE FEAR 03030006
293 Privateer Farms 1 CAPE FEAR 03030005 34,005 402.50 25.00
294 Purlear Creek 1 YADKIN 03040101 11,500 2.00 2.00
295 Purlear Creek II 1 YADKIN 03040101 2,620 1.05 0.30
92522 Puzzle Creek 1 BROAD 03050105 5,300
297 R- 2719 BA 1 NEUSE 03020202
92220 Reed's Creek 1 CATAWBA 03050101 4.20 2.20
301 Reedy Branch 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 3,150
303 Rich Fork FDP ( Bodenheimer- Parker) 1 YADKIN 03040103 3,000 20.00 2.00
304 Richland Creek 1na NEUSE 03020201 415
307 River Bend 1 ROANOKE 03010104 89.00 19.00
92758 Rockwell Pastures 1 YADKIN 03040104 10,757 375 6,051 685 1.50
308 Rocky Branch 1 YADKIN 03040102 4,400 1.50
310 Rocky Branch ( NCSU) Phase I 1 NEUSE 03020201
311 Rocky Branch ( NCSU) Phase II 1 NEUSE 03020201
312 Roquist 1 ROANOKE 03010107 500 45.00 3386.00
317 Rowan Branch 1 CAPE FEAR 03030006 600 10.00 67.00
746 Rowel Branch 1 CAPE FEAR 03030005
92675 SALT ( Sandhill Area Land Trust) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004
320 Sand Shoals 1 WHITE OAK 03020106
322 Sandy Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 2,700 3.60
321 Sandy Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 5.68 2.90
80 Sandy Creek -- Charles Williams 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 2,000 5.30 1.50
732 Sandy Mush ( Phase II) 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 80,800
730 Scuppernong River Mitigation Bank 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 11.35 19.00
331 Seven Springs 1 NEUSE 03020202
92916 Shadrick Creek 1 CATAWBA 03050101 3,579 1,246 2,953 1.00
92241 Sharpe Wetland Preservation 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 512 6.20
333 Sheperd's Tree 1 YADKIN 03040102 - 34 16.64 86.60 8.00
335 Silas Creek 1 YADKIN 03040101 782 3,662
336 Silver Creek 1 CATAWBA 03050101 5,127 1,392 2,036 1,077 5.30
92218 Silver Creek- Conway 1 CATAWBA 03050101 4,520
92234 Simpson Wetland 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020104 30.00
92663 Sink Hole Creek 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010108 3,560 12,460 1,760
340 Sleepy Creek 1 NEUSE 03020202 96.40 39.20 380.00
341 Smith Creek Site 1 CAPE FEAR 03030007
343 Smith/ Austin Creek 1 NEUSE 03020201 6,178 3,982 794 32.00
344 Snow Creek 1 ROANOKE 03010103 3,850 855
92764 Snowbird Tributaries 1 LITTLE TENNESSEE 06010204 810 8,070
345 South Buffalo Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 - 2.28 0.00
346 South Fork 1 CATAWBA 03050102 9,590 1,273 3,431
92701 South Fork Big Pine Creek( Charles/ McGinnis) 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105
347 South Fork Hopper 1 CATAWBA 03050101 7,213 5.10 1.00 9.90
93507 South Fork Wetlands 1 CATAWBA 03050102 12.00
348 South Muddy Creek 1 CATAWBA 03050101 12,573 2,653 7.30
349 Sparta Bog 1 NEW 05050001 11.90
351 Speight Branch 1 NEUSE 03020201 1.00 1.22 19.00
353 Spring Branch 1 CAPE FEAR 03030007
354 Spring Valley Park 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002
357 Stallings 1 NEUSE 03020204 4,159 5.30 5.50 17.00 43.20
360 Starmount Forest CC 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002
361 Starmount Park 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002
363 Stillhouse Creek 1 NEUSE 03020201 1,391 2.00
364 Stone Mountain 1 YADKIN 03040101 5,745 2,576 1.62
365 Stonebridge 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 6,240 8.60
92556 Stricker Branch 1 YADKIN 03040105 3,000
366 Sturgeon City ( Phase I) 1 WHITE OAK 03030001 0.35 2.69
367 Sturgeon City ( Phase II) 1 WHITE OAK 03030001 2.50
368 Suck Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 2,963 7.80
369 Sussman's Park 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002
370 Suther ( Dutch Buffalo Creek) 1 YADKIN 03040105 608 3,611 4,678 7.29 4.26 1.67
92249 Swift Creek Watershed Wetlands 1 NEUSE 03020201 65.20
92211 Tarlton Swamp 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 3,221 826 255 6.80 2.40
372 Tate Farm 1 NEW 05050001 1,880 1,202 18,288 16,204 2.36 4.52 0.02
92524 Thompson's Fork and Tributary 1 CATAWBA 03050101 5,000 4.30
92664 Three Mile Creek 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010108 6,764 210 5,865 1.30 2.00
379 Tick Creek ( Condoret Tract) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 2,734
92557 Timberlake ( Great Dismal Swamp) 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 5,000
92528 Tributary to Reedy Fork Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 6,800 500
388 Trout Cove Branch 1 HIWASSEE 06020002 3,900
389 Tucker Farm 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205
392 Tulula Bog 1 LITTLE TENNESSEE 06010204 2,269 1,101 52.36
394 Underhill 1 NEUSE 03020201
92632 Upper South Hominy Creek 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 735 2,760 1,600 1,500
395 Upper UT to Cane Creek ( Picard) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 6,604
92347 UT Bear Creek ( Weaver/ McLeod property) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 4,877 0.39 11.00
92500 UT Clarke Creek 1 YADKIN 03040105 2,257
92590 UT Ramah Creek 1 YADKIN 03040105 1,137 991 1,078 4,329
92383 UT Rocky River - Harris Road Middle 1 YADKIN 03040105 2,780 8.70 0.00 0.00
92837 UT to Altamahaw 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 1,500 1.00
92598 UT to Back Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 3,622
92596 UT to Bald Creek 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010108 2,065 150 1,150 900
Updated 12/ 31/ 2008
Appendix A: EEP Tier 1 Stream and Wetland Restoration, Enhancement, Creation and Preservation Sites - Gross Asset Project List - Alphabetically ( High Quality Preservation
sites are not listed in table below)
GIS ID
Project Name
Tier
River Basin
8- digit CU
Stream Restoration
Stream Enhancment I
Stream Enhancement II
Stream Preservation
Riparian Restoration
Riparian Creation
Riparian Enhancement
Riparian Preservation
Nonriparian Restoration
Nonriparian Creation
Nonriparian Enhancement
Nonriparian Preservation
Coastal Marsh Restoration
Coastal Marsh Creation
Coastal Marsh Enhancement
Coastal Marsh Preservation
Stream Buffer
Beginning Balance
397 UT to Barnes Creek ( HurleySite) 1 YADKIN 03040103 2,975 1,000 1.00 3.12
92719 UT to Bear Creek ( Phillips) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 694 1,070
857 UT to Crab Creek 1 NEW 05050001 4,026 583 2,172 7.90 0.20 3.70 4.70 0.00
434 UT to Crooked Creek/ Speas Property 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020101 2,267 210 2.80 10.80
92712 Ut to Goose Creek( Haigler & Rowell) 1 YADKIN 03040105
92711 Ut to Goose Creek( Haigler/ Price) 1 YADKIN 03040105
92713 Ut to Goose Creek( Sasser/ Carriker) 1 YADKIN 03040105
92714 Ut to Goose Creek( Williams/ Matlock) 1 YADKIN 03040105
92471 UT to Hauser Creek 1 YADKIN 03040101 2,300
92694 UT to Haw ( Bechom) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 2,200 1,050 2.00
92753 UT to Haw ( Gwynn) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 2,000 2.00
747 UT to Haw River 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 10,150 1,000
371 UT to Hendricks Creek ( Tarboro Canal) 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020103 1,157 3.93
92345 UT to Jumping Run Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 7,077 1,935 82.50 3.40 17.10
92705 Ut to Laxon Creek ( Carp site) 1 NEW 05050001
290 UT to Lilliput Creek ( Hog Branch Ponds) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030005 3,238 20.45 7.83 96.46 87.74
314 UT to Little Coharie Creek ( Roseboro Site) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030006 1,630 700
92766 UT to Martins Creek ( Contreras) 1 HIWASSEE 06020002 3,475 525 0.90
92704 Ut to Peak Creek ( Bare site) 1 NEW 05050001 0.00
402 UT to Rocky River ( Smith Tract) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 1,111 208 887 1.20
403 UT to Sandy Creek ( Williams Tract) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 2,590 3.57
435 UT to South Fork Creek ( Hadley- Newlin) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 6,000
405 UT to South Fork Creek ( Stephens) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 4,500
847 UT to Uwharrie 1 YADKIN 03040103 6,096 946 220 762 0.50 0.96
442 UT to West Fork of Deep River 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 1,500 3,500 6.89
407 Valley Fields Farm Site 1 YADKIN 03040103 9,500 300 8,730 5.00 3.00 4.00 4.00
409 Wake Forest C. C. 1 NEUSE 03020201 3,400 0.00
412 Warrior Creek 1 YADKIN 03040101 10,585 450
413 Watts Property 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 1,000 4.00 40.00
414 Wells Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 2,986 2,757
92688 Wells Creek # 2 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 2,100 1,650
417 White Oak Creek 1 NEUSE 03020201 8.68 3.34 1.60 18.62
419 Whitehall Reserve 1 CATAWBA 03050103
420 Whitelace Creek 1 NEUSE 03020202 3,693 2,208 7.70 13.00 2.40
423 Wike Property ( Lyle Creek) 1 CATAWBA 03050101 2,067
92508 Wildcat Branch 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 5,733 26.00
92551 Wolf Pond 1 YADKIN 03040105 4,500
92555 Woodlawn Branch 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 5,000
92606 WRC Bowlin- Peak Creek 1 NEW 05050001
432 Zack's Fork Ck RFP* 1 CATAWBA 03050101 3,900
Updated 12/ 31/ 2008
Appendix B: EEP Tier 1 Stream and Wetland Restoration, Enhancement, Creation and Preservation Sites - Gross Asset Summary ( High Quality Preservation Sites are not listed in the table below).
Stream
Restoration
Stream
Enhancment I
Stream
Enhancement II
Stream
Preservation
Riparian
Restoration
Riparian Creation
Riparian
Enhancement
Riparian
Preservation
Nonriparian
Restoration
Nonriparian
Creation
Nonriparian
Enhancement
Nonriparian
Preservation
Coastal Marsh
Restoration
Coastal Marsh
Creation
Coastal Marsh
Enhancement
Coastal Marsh
Preservation
Stream Buffer
Broad 70,244 10,618 10,684 7,369 11.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03050105 Total 70,244 10,618 10,684 7,369 11.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 5,167 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 65,077 10,618 10,684 7,369 11.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
Cape Fear 308,582 33,007 37,801 66,626 753.61 10.20 165.72 1,025.32 922.98 0.00 223.14 496.74 9.02 0.00 85.76 0.00 117.9
03030001 Located in White Oak
03030002 Total 74,372 18,627 31,064 31,822 75.77 0.00 12.72 180.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.3
MOU 42,248 14,707 21,674 20,684 32.70 0.00 5.50 158.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.3
MOA 32,124 3,920 9,390 11,138 43.07 0.00 7.22 22.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03030003 Total 133,538 10,919 4,587 11,466 6.07 0.00 7.30 10.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 105.6
MOU 39,809 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.8
MOA 93,729 10,919 4,587 11,466 6.07 0.00 7.30 10.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 97.8
03030004 Total 50,609 2,761 800 22,738 203.60 0.00 95.70 223.63 32.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 19,378 2,761 0 12,655 170.30 0.00 55.80 42.00 17.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 31,231 0 800 10,083 33.30 0.00 39.90 181.63 15.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03030005 Total 37,243 0 0 0 419.65 0.00 25.00 20.45 677.11 0.00 114.36 87.74 9.02 0.00 85.76 0.00 0.0
MOU 3,238 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.45 7.83 0.00 96.46 87.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 34,005 0 0 0 419.65 0.00 25.00 0.00 669.28 0.00 17.90 0.00 9.02 0.00 85.76 0.00 0.0
03030006 Total 1,630 700 0 600 10.00 0.00 0.00 67.00 160.51 0.00 2.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 1,630 700 0 600 10.00 0.00 0.00 67.00 160.51 0.00 2.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03030007 Total 11,190 0 1,350 0 38.52 10.20 25.00 523.00 53.26 0.00 106.60 409.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 11,190 0 1,350 0 25.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 0 0 0 0 12.72 10.20 25.00 523.00 53.26 0.00 106.60 409.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
Catawba 142,754 10,278 22,876 18,498 53.94 38.13 20.54 16.94 2.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 113.4
03050101 Total 115,210 7,505 19,445 18,498 36.49 1.50 19.78 12.30 2.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 112.4
MOU 80,639 6,938 19,445 15,895 25.99 1.50 18.53 8.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 92.4
MOA 34,571 567 0 2,603 10.50 0.00 1.25 4.30 2.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.0
03050102 Total 23,144 1,273 3,431 0 17.45 35.13 0.76 4.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 23,144 1,273 3,431 0 17.45 35.13 0.76 4.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03050103 Total 4,400 1,500 0 0 0.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.0
MOU 4,400 1,500 0 0 0.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.0
MOA 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
Chowan 11,128 1,700 0 6,086 97.30 0.00 0.00 15.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03010203 Total 8,310 1,700 0 3,300 85.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 8,310 1,700 0 3,300 85.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03010201 Total 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03010202 Total 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03010204 Total 2,818 0 0 2,786 12.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 2,818 0 0 2,786 12.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
French Broad 37,917 26,369 85,196 10,025 11.90 0.00 18.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
06010105 Total 16,560 9,454 83,756 1,500 10.00 0.00 15.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 9,000 2,300 0 0 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 7,560 7,154 83,756 1,500 0.00 0.00 15.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
06010106 Total 3,483 530 0 0 0.60 0.00 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 3,483 530 0 0 0.60 0.00 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
06010108 Total 17,874 16,385 1,440 8,525 1.30 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 17,874 16,385 1,440 8,525 1.30 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
Hiwassee 9,175 525 3,100 8,500 3.53 0.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
06020002 Total 9,175 525 3,100 8,500 3.53 0.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 3,900 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 5,275 525 3,100 8,500 3.53 0.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
06020003 Total 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
Little Tennessee 7,607 1,082 4,990 15,421 58.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
06010202 Total 4,358 1,082 1,490 0 6.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 4,358 1,082 1,490 0 6.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
06010203 Total 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
06010204 Total 3,249 0 3,500 15,421 52.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 3,249 0 3,500 15,421 52.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
Lumber 8,282 0 0 1,750 62.00 0.25 30.44 35.80 670.08 0.00 0.00 301.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03040203 Total 0 0 0 0 57.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 590.08 0.00 0.00 300.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 0 0 0 0 57.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 590.08 0.00 0.00 300.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03040204 Total 5,000 0 0 0 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 5,000 0 0 0 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03040206 Total 3,282 0 0 1,750 0.00 0.25 0.44 35.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 3,282 0 0 1,750 0.00 0.25 0.44 35.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03040207 Total 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 80.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 80.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
River Basin
Cataloging
Unit
Gross Assets
Updated 12/ 31/ 2008
Appendix B: EEP Tier 1 Stream and Wetland Restoration, Enhancement, Creation and Preservation Sites - Gross Asset Summary ( High Quality Preservation Sites are not listed in the table below).
Stream
Restoration
Stream
Enhancment I
Stream
Enhancement II
Stream
Preservation
Riparian
Restoration
Riparian Creation
Riparian
Enhancement
Riparian
Preservation
Nonriparian
Restoration
Nonriparian
Creation
Nonriparian
Enhancement
Nonriparian
Preservation
Coastal Marsh
Restoration
Coastal Marsh
Creation
Coastal Marsh
Enhancement
Coastal Marsh
Preservation
Stream Buffer
River Basin
Cataloging
Unit
Gross Assets
Neuse 118,515 14,525 10,921 16,398 457.52 8.34 264.15 1,713.33 1,530.62 5.80 1,984.20 776.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 247.1
03020201 Total 79,285 7,605 8,713 9,793 86.58 8.34 66.82 239.52 97.80 4.90 0.00 20.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 137.6
MOU 36,122 7,605 8,671 6,100 43.73 4.00 64.00 134.00 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 117.6
MOA 43,163 0 42 3,693 42.85 4.34 2.82 105.52 97.20 4.90 0.00 20.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.0
03020202 Total 14,462 3,693 2,208 3,205 188.16 0.00 86.20 660.30 25.00 0.00 0.00 125.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 42.4
MOU 4,325 3,693 2,208 3,205 7.70 0.00 13.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.4
MOA 10,137 0 0 0 180.46 0.00 73.20 660.30 25.00 0.00 0.00 125.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 40.0
03020203 Total 14,193 2,830 0 0 97.88 0.00 5.43 429.21 30.00 0.90 0.40 147.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18.3
MOU 2,232 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.6
MOA 11,961 2,830 0 0 97.88 0.00 5.43 429.21 30.00 0.90 0.40 147.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.7
03020204 Total 10,575 397 0 3,400 84.90 0.00 105.70 384.30 1,377.82 0.00 1,983.80 483.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48.9
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 122.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 10,575 397 0 3,400 84.90 0.00 105.70 384.30 1,377.82 0.00 1,983.80 361.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48.9
New 16,061 1,817 20,621 19,189 12.01 0.20 8.22 10.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
05050001 Total 16,061 1,817 20,621 19,189 12.01 0.20 8.22 10.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 3,230 1,692 20,038 16,204 2.36 0.00 4.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 12,831 125 583 2,985 9.65 0.20 3.70 10.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
Pasquotank 15,400 2,500 0 0 396.80 0.00 21.40 67.65 1,149.13 0.00 6.00 139.32 0.00 19.77 0.00 180.94 0.0
03010205 Total 15,400 2,500 0 0 396.80 0.00 21.40 67.65 1,149.13 0.00 6.00 139.32 0.00 19.77 0.00 180.94 0.0
MOU 1,000 0 0 0 5.66 0.00 0.60 19.00 41.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 14,400 2,500 0 0 391.14 0.00 20.80 48.65 1,107.63 0.00 6.00 139.32 0.00 19.77 0.00 180.94 0.0
Roanoke 46,821 4,626 3,499 13,673 154.00 0.00 0.00 576.43 239.00 0.00 8.00 3,457.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03010102 Total 0 2,539 0 12,710 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 0 2,539 0 12,710 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03010103 Total 13,850 855 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 3,850 855 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 10,000 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03010104 Total 12,720 1,232 3,499 463 89.00 0.00 0.00 19.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 12,720 1,232 3,499 463 89.00 0.00 0.00 19.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03010106 Total 5,000 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 5,000 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03010107 Total 15,251 0 0 500 65.00 0.00 0.00 557.43 239.00 0.00 8.00 3,457.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 15,251 0 0 500 65.00 0.00 0.00 557.43 239.00 0.00 8.00 3,457.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
Savannah 3,310 1,600 0 3,115 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03060101 Total 3,310 1,600 0 3,115 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 3,310 1,600 0 3,115 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03060102 Total 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
Tar- Pamlico 27,904 5,170 2,585 0 140.84 59.40 35.10 419.90 388.23 9.24 41.55 357.19 0.30 0.00 0.00 189.60 83.8
03020101 Total 12,615 2,137 210 0 13.70 2.80 4.50 10.30 47.40 0.00 0.70 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 35.3
MOU 3,361 2,137 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 31.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.6
MOA 9,254 0 210 0 13.70 2.80 4.50 10.30 15.70 0.00 0.70 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 29.7
03020102 Total 6,500 0 0 0 87.00 0.00 7.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 6,500 0 0 0 87.00 0.00 7.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03020103 Total 6,789 3,033 0 0 2.94 56.60 23.60 348.00 128.50 0.00 2.25 9.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.1
MOU 0 1,157 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.9
MOA 6,789 1,876 0 0 2.94 56.60 23.60 348.00 128.50 0.00 2.25 9.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 29.2
03020104 Total 2,000 0 2,375 0 21.20 0.00 0.00 61.60 192.33 9.24 38.60 347.97 0.30 0.00 0.00 189.60 15.4
MOU 2,000 0 0 0 20.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.5
MOA 0 0 2,375 0 1.20 0.00 0.00 61.60 192.33 9.24 38.60 347.97 0.30 0.00 0.00 189.60 10.9
03020105 Total 0 0 0 0 16.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 0 0 0 0 16.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
Watauga 2,767 279 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
06010103 Total 2,767 279 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 2,767 279 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
White Oak 27,900 0 931 2,010 41.35 0.00 3.80 3.90 383.00 0.00 52.00 110.50 5.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03030001 Total 18,301 0 931 0 16.75 0.00 2.00 0.00 53.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 8,022 0 376 0 3.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 10,279 0 555 0 13.10 0.00 2.00 0.00 38.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03020106 Total 9,599 0 0 2,010 24.60 0.00 1.80 3.90 329.90 0.00 52.00 110.50 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 250.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 9,599 0 0 2,010 21.60 0.00 1.80 3.90 79.90 0.00 52.00 110.50 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
Yadkin 212,365 21,264 43,526 71,672 206.38 161.92 46.49 77.47 4.00 1.50 8.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03040101 Total 59,378 8,112 4,076 2,376 58.95 21.82 2.91 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 48,428 7,112 2,576 0 3.05 1.62 2.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 10,950 1,000 1,500 2,376 55.90 20.20 0.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03040102 Total 29,661 0 0 0 31.24 130.30 14.80 5.50 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 29,661 0 0 0 31.24 130.30 14.80 5.50 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03040103 Total 33,218 3,532 7,113 25,396 26.00 1.10 9.22 3.20 4.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 33,218 3,532 7,113 25,396 26.00 1.10 9.22 3.20 4.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03040104 Total 17,537 2,246 18,577 17,424 39.90 0.00 1.00 5.90 0.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 17,537 2,246 18,577 17,424 39.90 0.00 1.00 5.90 0.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03040105 Total 55,867 6,604 11,760 16,916 7.59 8.70 9.16 6.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 12,254 1,808 0 0 0.00 8.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 43,613 4,796 11,760 16,916 7.59 0.00 9.16 6.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03040201 Total 16,704 770 2,000 9,560 42.70 0.00 9.40 55.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 2,000 0 0.00 0.00 2.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 16,704 770 0 9,560 42.70 0.00 6.90 55.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03040202 Total 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOU 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
MOA 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
Grand Total 1,066,732 135,359 246,730 260,332 2,460.94 278.44 615.42 3,962.07 5,299.44 16.54 2,322.89 5,661.77 14.42 19.77 85.76 370.54 562.3
Grand Total MOU 343,793 54,265 78,338 74,743 353.94 17.32 166.45 381.75 363.83 0.00 96.46 209.76 5.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 250.2
Grand Total MOA 722,939 81,095 168,392 185,589 2,107.00 261.12 448.97 3,580.32 4,935.61 16.54 2,226.43 5,452.01 8.93 19.77 85.76 370.54 312.2
Updated 12/ 31/ 2008
Appendix C: EEP Tier 1 Stream and Wetland Restoration, Enhancement, Creation and Preservation Sites - Net Asset Summary ( in Credits)
Stream
Restoration
Stream
Restoration
Equivalent
Riparian
Restoration
Riparian
Restoration
Equivalent
Nonriparian
Restoration
Nonriparian
Restoration
Equivalent
Coastal
Marsh
Restoration
Coastal
Marsh
Restoration
Equivalent
Stream
Buffer
Broad 79,448 1,330.80 11.40 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
03050105 Total 79,448 1,331 11.40 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 79,448 1,331 11.40 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Cape Fear 97,677 5,283 432.54 227.47 855.80 194.87 8.99 42.88 21.80
03030001 0.00
03030002 Total 22,001 2,681 26.68 11.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.30
MOU 1,562 479 3.16 2.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.30
MOA 20,439 2,202 23.52 8.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
03030003 Total 31,820 466 3.31 3.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.50
MOU 1,659 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 30,161 466 3.31 3.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.50
03030004 Total 30,159 2,017 132.38 68.77 18.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 4,216 0 103.44 2.33 15.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 25,943 2,017 28.94 66.45 3.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
03030005 Total 10,710 0 231.64 13.33 634.89 63.48 8.99 42.88 0.00
MOU 2,644 0 0.01 0.88 0.00 54.53 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 8,066 0 231.63 12.46 634.89 8.95 8.99 42.88 0.00
03030006 Total 1,593 120 8.93 13.40 160.02 1.09 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 1,593 120 8.93 13.40 160.02 1.09 0.00 0.00 0.00
03030007 Total 1,394 0 29.60 116.76 42.12 130.30 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 274 0 13.95 0.00 2.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 1,120 0 15.65 116.76 39.35 130.30 0.00 0.00 0.00
Catawba 30,855 39 9.99 7.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 90.00
03050101 Total 12,619 39 6.64 6.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 90.00
MOU 0 0 2.75 5.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 70.00
MOA 12,619 39 3.89 1.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00
03050102 Total 18,236 0 3.35 0.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 19 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 18,217 0 3.35 0.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
03050103 Total 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Chowan 12,249 1,217 94.73 3.00 4.99 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
03010203 Total 9,443 660 84.40 3.00 4.99 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 9,443 660 84.40 3.00 4.99 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
03010201 Total 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
03010202 Total 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
03010204 Total 2,806 557 10.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 2,806 557 10.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
French Broad 75,034 1,935 5.34 9.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
06010105 Total 43,968 230 3.81 7.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 2.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 43,967 230 1.75 7.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
06010106 Total 3,270 0 0.60 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 3,270 0 0.60 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
06010108 Total 27,796 1,705 0.93 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 27,796 1,705 0.93 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hiwassee 6,865 1,700 3.53 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
06020002 Total 6,865 1,700 3.53 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 6,865 1,700 3.53 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
06020003 Total 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Little Tennessee 9,890 3,084 57.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
06010202 Total 5,240 0 5.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 5,240 0 5.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
06010203 Total 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
River Basin
Cataloging Unit
Net Debited Asset Credits ( does not include outstanding permit requirements that have not yet been debited)
Updated 12/ 31/ 2008
Appendix C: EEP Tier 1 Stream and Wetland Restoration, Enhancement, Creation and Preservation Sites - Net Asset Summary ( in Credits)
Stream
Restoration
Stream
Restoration
Equivalent
Riparian
Restoration
Riparian
Restoration
Equivalent
Nonriparian
Restoration
Nonriparian
Restoration
Equivalent
Coastal
Marsh
Restoration
Coastal
Marsh
Restoration
Equivalent
Stream
Buffer
River Basin
Cataloging Unit
Net Debited Asset Credits ( does not include outstanding permit requirements that have not yet been debited)
06010204 Total 4,649 3,084 52.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 4,649 3,084 52.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Lumber 8,163 350 48.16 20.40 573.62 60.28 0.00 0.00 0.00
03040203 Total 0 0 43.24 13.71 517.42 60.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 0 0 43.24 13.71 517.42 60.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
03040204 Total 4,946 0 4.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 4,946 0 4.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
03040206 Total 3,217 350 0.06 6.69 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00
M