North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
An Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer - 50 % Recycled \ 10 % Post Consumer Paper
1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699- 1652
Phone: 919- 733- 4984 \ FAX: 919- 715- 3060 \ Internet: www. enr. state. nc. us/ ENR/
EEP shared/ moa quarterly reports/ Q1/ coverletter 2 08 06
Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
February 10, 2006
Col. John E. Pulliam, Jr., Commander
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 29402- 1890
Attn: Scott C. McLendon
Re: Memorandum of Agreement ( MOA) Quarterly Report
Dear Colonel Pulliam:
The Ecosystem Enhancement Program ( EEP) is pleased to submit Quarterly Report # 1 of State Fiscal
Year 2005- 2006 to the United States Army Corps of Engineers ( USACE) Wilmington District. The
materials presented within provide information as required under Section VII, Part B of the Memorandum
of Agreement among the USACE, the North Carolina Department of Transportation ( NCDOT) and the
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources ( NCDENR), signed into effect on July
22, 2003.
This Quarterly Report addresses the period beginning July 1 and ending September 30, 2005. The MOA
Section IX transition period ended during this quarter and a detailed End of Transition report was sent to
you on October 26, 2005. Additional programmatic information pertaining to the Tri- Party MOA and the
in- lieu MOU was provided in our annual report to the Environmental Review Committee on December 1,
2005.
EEP has implemented quality assurance improvements to verify the quality of data contained within the
project database. In doing so, technical staff has completed an evaluation of site assets and updated this
information. Three main assurance tools that were implemented include: re- design of the database and the
database input support structure; intensive on- site assessment of NCWRP, NCDOT and EEP managed
projects; and project by project data evaluation. This intensive assurance process has led us to produce
this report later than planned, but we believe the results provide a better reflection of our program status
and needs.
An Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer - 50 % Recycled \ 10 % Post Consumer Paper
1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699- 1652
Phone: 919- 733- 4984 \ FAX: 919- 715- 3060 \ Internet: www. enr. state. nc. us/ ENR/
EEP shared/ moa quarterly reports/ Q1/ coverletter 2 08 06
Col. Pulliam
February 10, 2006
Page 2
Status Report of Activities
Restoration Initiatives:
EEP continues to accelerate production toward advanced mitigation. We presently have $ 142,200,000 in
active contracts and have programmed an additional $ 60 million to 70 million toward restoration of
wetlands and streams in 30 cataloguing units. Our plans are to contract this work through June and July,
2006.
High- Quality Preservation Initiatives:
Quarter 1 was marked by closings on five properties meeting high quality preservation criteria. These
acquisitions protected 9,050 linear feet of streams and 31 acres of wetlands. EEP is continuing the
acquisition of appropriate properties. EEP also secured options on 29,461 feet of stream and 4 acres of
wetlands. Total activity in Quarter 1 resulted in processing 39,011 feet of stream and 35 acres of
wetlands.
Watershed Planning for Projected Impacts:
In Quarter 1 EEP initiated three new Phase I Local Watershed Plans ( LWPs) in the Lumber, Tar- Pamlico,
and Neuse river basins. EEP amended existing project- development contracts to fast- track LWP services
for the upper Broad River basin, to continue Phases II and III of the Little River and Brush Creek LWP,
and to initiate Phase IV of the Stoney Creek LWP. EEP also completed contracts to develop stream-assessment
methods in Eastern North Carolina local watershed planning for the middle Tar- Pamlico River
basin, identify stream and wetland restoration opportunities in the Lumber 03 river basin, and assess
conditions and provide recommendations for the Swift Creek local watershed in the Neuse 01 river basin.
Staffing:
The EEP continues to augment resources and presently stand at 51 staff . We have recently restructured
field operations by physiographic regions to improve efficiency of operations.
Process Improvement:
The Policy, Process and Procedures Manual is on the Web, continually updated, and improved by staff as
changes are made and new procedures are developed. The Information Management Database IBEAM
scoping documentation has been completed and approved, and EEP began the bidding process in
February 2006. We plan to share database development with your staff as this important program is put
into production.
Col. Pulliam
February 10, 2006
Page 3
Planned Near Term Activities
We have recently received projected TIP impacts from the NCDOT. In March we will develop a new
strategic plan that will define our operational and procurement strategies for MOA Years 4 and 5. In
doing so, we anticipate an aggressive procurement process to begin in July 2006. Also, in March and
through April, we will be conducting technical and field reviews of RFP’s that were posted in October
2005 and received in March 2006. Our plan is to have project awards move into production as early as
August 2006.
In closing, the Ecosystem Enhancement Program continues to make significant progress and is committed
to the success of this innovative partnership. We appreciate the continued leadership provided by your
office. Please don’t hesitate to further discuss our program status at any time.
Respectfully,
William D. Gilmore, PE
Director, Ecosystem Enhancement Program
cc: Dempsey Benton, Chief Deputy Secretary, NCDENR
L. A. Sanderson, PE, Highway Administrator, NCDOT
An Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer - 50 % Recycled \ 10 % Post Consumer Paper
1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699- 1652
Phone: 919- 733- 4984 \ FAX: 919- 715- 3060 \ Internet: www. enr. state. nc. us/ ENR/
EEP shared/ moa quarterly reports/ Q1/ coverletter 2 08 06
North Carolina Department
of Environment and Natural
Resources
ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT
PROGRAM
QUARTERLY REPORT
July 1, 2005 - September 30, 2005
This quarterly report is intended to satisfy reporting
requirements of the Memorandum of Agreement entered into
by the North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources ( NCDENR), the North Carolina
Department of Transportation ( NCDOT), and the United
States Army Corps of Engineers ( USACE), Wilmington
District, on July 22, 2003, for providing compensatory
mitigation through the NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement
Program to offset impacts to waters and wetlands due to
activities authorized by Clean Water Act permits.
U. S. Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmington District
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report
July 1, 2005 - September 30, 2005
Table of Contents
Page
i. Introduction 3
ii. Report Structure 3
Section I. EEP Restoration, Enhancement, Creation, and Preservation Projects 4
EEP Gross Assets 4
EEP Gross Asset Summary 5
EEP Net Remaining Assets 5
EEP Gross High Quality Preservation Assets 5
Table 1: High Quality Preservation Sites Acquired this Quarter 7
EEP Net High Quality Preservation Assets 7
Section II. Tri- Party Memorandum of Agreement 9
EEP MOA Gross and Net Assets 9
MOA Current Mitigation Debits and Requirements 9
MOA Future Requirements – Remaining NCDOT Projected Impacts 10
MOA Compliance 10
MOA Future Expectations 10
Section III. In- Lieu Fee Memorandum of Understanding 13
EEP ILF MOU Assets – Gross and Net Assets 13
ILF MOU Present and Future Quarter Mitigation Requirements 13
MOU Net Asset Balances – Surplus and Deficits 13
MOU Compliance 14
MOU Future Expectations 14
Section IV. Planning 16
Watershed Planning for Projected Impacts 16
Section V. Monitoring 17
USGS Eight- Digit Cataloging Units Map 18
Section VI. EEP Compliance Action Strategies by Cataloging Unit 19
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2005 – September 30, 2005 1
Appendix Listing
Appendix A EEP Gross Asset List of Tier 1 Restoration, Enhancement, Creation, and
Preservation Sites
Appendix B Summary of EEP Gross Assets
Appendix C EEP Net Remaining Asset Credits
Appendix D EEP Gross High Quality Preservation Project List and Summary
D1 – Gross HQP Project List
D2 – Gross HQP Summary
Appendix E Summaries of EEP High Quality Preservation Assets Utilized and
Remaining
E1 - Net Remaining HQP Assets Summary
E2 – Utilized HQP Assets Summary
Appendix F MOA Mitigation Requirements and Debits
F1- Total MOA Mitigation Acceptances
( List of Commitments and Requirements)
F2- List of Current EEP MOA Year 3 Mitigation Requirements
F3- List of Outstanding EEP MOA Mitigation Commitments
F4- Summary of Outstanding EEP MOA Mitigation Requirements
F5- Summary of Outstanding EEP MOA Mitigation Commitments
F6- List of MOA Permit Requirements and Debits
Appendix G MOA Future Requirements - Remaining NCDOT Projected Impacts
Appendix H MOA Net Asset Balances Through September 30, 2005
Appendix I MOA Outstanding Permit Requirements
Appendix J MOU ILF Present and Future Quarter Mitigation Requirements
Appendix K MOU Net Asset Balances Through September 30, 2005
Appendix L MOU Outstanding Permit Requirements
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2005 – September 30, 2005 2
i. Introduction
This report covers the period beginning July 1, 2005 through September 30, 2005.
The Transition Period ended during this quarter on July 22, 2005. An End of
Transition Report was produced and is available on the EEP web site. This report
documents the quarterly status of both the Memorandum of Understanding
( MOU) between NCDENR and USACE established in 1998 and Memorandum of
Agreement ( MOA) between NCDENR, USACE and NCDOT, signed July 22,
2003 establishing EEP programs within a single document. It is expected that the
format of this report will evolve as improvements and adjustments are suggested
and made by USACE and other interested parties. For more information about
the agreements, visit our web site at www. nceep. net.
ii. Report Structure
This report is broken into six main sections:
SECTION I. EEP Restoration, Enhancement, Creation, and Preservation Projects.
This section reports the EEP restoration, enhancement, creation, and preservation
projects that have been developed under the MOA and MOU programs. This
section lists EEP projects, provides a summary of Gross Assets, and a summary of
Net Assets.
SECTION II. MOA– This section details specifics regarding the MOA program.
SECTION III. MOU– This section details specifics regarding the MOU program.
SECTION IV. Planning– This section summarizes watershed planning efforts
during the quarter.
SECTION V. Monitoring– This section summarizes project monitoring efforts
during the quarter.
SECTION IV. Compliance Action Strategies by Cataloging Unit– This section
discusses the specific action strategies EEP has in place to address any
outstanding mitigation needs in the various river basins and cataloging units in
North Carolina.
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2005 – September 30, 2005 3
SECTION I:
EEP RESTORATION, ENHANCEMENT, CREATION, and PRESERVATION
PROJECTS
Section I is a report on the status of the restoration, enhancement, creation, and
preservation projects developed by the Ecosystem Enhancement Program. High
quality preservation projects are also summarized independent of EEP’s other
restoration, enhancement, and preservation projects.
EEP GROSS ASSETS
Currently, the Ecosystem Enhancement Program has assets exceeding 945,133
feet of stream and 17,468 acres of wetlands. In addition to these, EEP has
instituted high- quality preservation assets exceeding 1,089,263 linear feet ( nearly
206.3 miles) of streams and 8,081 acres of wetlands. EEP has completed High
Quality Preservation acquisition for 710,498 linear feet of stream and 7,538 acres
of wetlands.
EEP projects originate from three main areas:
1. Projects that were developed and constructed by NCDOT;
2. Projects that were initiated by the NC Wetlands Restoration Program; and
3. Projects that have been initiated by the Ecosystem Enhancement Program.
Appendix A: EEP Gross Asset List of Tier 1 Restoration, Enhancement,
Creation, and Preservation Sites contains a complete listing of the current EEP
individual restoration, enhancement, creation, and preservation projects as of
September 30, 2005 by river basin and eight- digit Cataloging Unit ( CU). ( High
Quality Preservations sites are not listed in this table.) All of the projects listed in
Appendix A have had their mitigation credits transferred to or originated from the
Ecosystem Enhancement Program. For former NCDOT projects that had
completed construction prior to the formation of EEP ( project type 1 above), only
the undebited remaining restoration, enhancement, or preservation feet/ acres were
transferred. Thus Appendix A only shows the transferred ( undebited) restoration,
enhancement, or preservation remaining for these projects. In some cases, former
NCDOT projects had no remaining credits associated with a specific project.
These projects are listed as having no gross assets in Appendix A. All of the
other types of projects show the gross amount of restoration, enhancement, or
preservation associated with these projects. These numbers are subject to change
as design or monitoring results are received.
The projects initiated ( but not completed/ not debited) by NCDOT’s Project
Development and Environmental Analysis Branch prior to the inception of the
EEP are in various stages of implementation. EEP is currently managing these
projects. EEP will utilize these mitigation credits according to the guidelines of
the Tri- Party MOA. The projects that were initiated by NCDOT as full- delivery
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2005 – September 30, 2005 4
projects are currently under contract with NCDOT but are available for debiting
for the purposes of the EEP, as determined by credit release schedules.
Projects that were initiated and developed by the staff of the NCDENR Wetlands
Restoration Program have been acquired as defined by the 1998 MOU between
the USACE and NCDENR, or the EEP 2003 MOA.
EEP GROSS ASSET SUMMARY
Appendix B: Summary of EEP Gross Assets is a summary of the gross assets
by river basin and CU. Appendix B also provides grand totals for the entire state.
These numbers are subject to change as design and/ or monitoring results are
received or as new projects are added into the program. Also, as stated above,
former NCDOT sites that were completed and partially debited prior to the
formation of EEP contain only the remaining credits from each site. This means
that only the remaining credits ( as determined by NCDOT and USACE) were
summarized in this table for NCDOT transferred projects.
EEP NET REMAINING ASSETS
Appendix C: EEP Net Remaining Asset Credits is a summary of the remaining
assets associated with restoration, enhancement, creation, and preservation
projects that the EEP currently has available to meet compensatory mitigation
requirements. The remaining assets are summarized for the MOA and MOU
programs, respectively. Note that the assets have been converted into restoration
and restoration equivalent credits in this table. The amounts of mitigation
provided in the table are the total remaining amount of mitigation available to a
particular project over time. Where credit release schedules have been established,
EEP will debit from these projects accordingly.
Please note that amounts of mitigation for any project may change from the
current snapshot as additional design and monitoring information becomes
available to EEP or as mitigation units are refined as per the goals set forth in the
EEP Tri- Party 2003 MOA.
EEP GROSS HIGH QUALITY PRESERVATION ASSETS
Appendix D1: EEP Gross High Quality Preservation Project List and
Summary is a list of all HQP that EEP has instituted since July 2003 by
ecoregion. All high quality preservation assets are currently MOA assets. Gross
stream and wetland feet or acreages are subject to change as additional survey
work is completed on these sites. EEP has protected 206.3 miles of stream, along
with 6,762 acres of riverine wetland and 1,318 acres of non- riverine wetland.
Preservation Site Status as of September 30, 2005
Seven ecoregions have met HQP targets. EEP is working through the
Conservation Trust for North Carolina and the N. C. Coastal Land Trust to acquire
the Waccamaw River Milliken tract, as discussed in previous reports. The land
trust and landowner are still working towards an agreement. Three appraisals
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2005 – September 30, 2005 5
have been received and are being reviewed by the State Property Office. The
offer was sent to the landowner in mid- September. If no agreement is reached,
EEP plans to purchase a portion of another tract that has been approved for use as
high quality preservation by the Preservation Review Committee. The site is
within the ecoregion, targeted by several agencies, and will make up for the
deficit.
Table 1 examines HQP sites that are being acquired or have been acquired this
quarter, by amount, type, and eight- digit CU based on the Exhibit B anticipated
impacts attachment of the MOA, and also shows projects that were initiated in a
previous quarter and whose status has changed this quarter. This table is
organized by ecoregion to correlate with preservation accounting.
Site status definitions for Table 1:
All sites were reviewed favorably by Preservation Review Committee
Option: option to purchase obtained by State Property Office
Acquired: site purchased or easement obtained by State Property Office
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2005 – September 30, 2005 6
Table 1: High Quality Preservation Sites Acquired this Quarter
Ecoregion River basin Cataloging
Unit
Site Name Preservation
Wetland
Assets ( ac)
Preservation
Stream Assets
( ft)
Site Status
Central
Piedmont
Roanoke
Tar- Pamlico
Yadkin
03010103
03010104
03020102
03040102
03040103
03040104
Mayo River
Grogan
Hyco Lake
Bessemer
Fishing Creek
Green
Little Shocco
Creek Wheless
Tar River B.
Crews
Tar River R.
Crews
South Yadkin
River Crowther
Dutch Second
Creek Hill
Little River
Baker
Little River
Parker
4
31
2,019
12,333
1,117
598
1,935
915
2,150
2,685
1,079
2,683
Closed
Option
Closed
Option
Option
Option
Closed
Closed
Closed
Option
Total CPD 35 27,514
Southern
Piedmont
Broad
Lumber
Yadkin
03050105
03040203
03040104
Skyuka Creek
Luthi
Deep / Sandy
Creek McKean
Little River
Cochran
1,993
6,500
3,004
Option
Option
Option
Total SPD 11,497
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2005 – September 30, 2005 7
EEP NET HIGH QUALITY PRESERVATION ASSETS
Appendix E1: EEP Net Remaining HQP Assets Summary summarizes by
Ecoregion the net remaining high quality preservation assets available to EEP for
future compensatory mitigation needs. All HQP assets currently are MOA assets.
Stream feet and/ or wetland acreages are subject to change as additional survey
work is completed on sites.
Across the state, EEP has net high quality preservation assets of 687,266 feet
( 130.16 miles) of stream, 6,140.74 acres of riverine wetlands and 1,138.1 acres of
non- riverine wetland. These assets can be utilized to offset future compensatory
mitigation needs accepted by EEP.
Appendix E2: Utilized HQP Assets Summary summarizes the amount of HQP
assets that have thus far been utilized by EEP to offset compensatory mitigation
needs.
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2005 – September 30, 2005 8
SECTION II:
TRI- PARTY MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT ( MOA)
This section of the report provides specifics with regard to the Tri- Party MOA.
Specifically, this section describes the current EEP mitigation acceptances under
the MOA, the debits that have been made thus far, the schedule for future debits,
and the remaining projected impacts that the NCDOT has supplied that may
indicate when future requirements may occur.
The end of the MOA transition period occurred during this quarter. An End of
Transition Report was produced and is available on the EEP website. The report
includes full debit results of mitigation requirements for the transition period.
EEP MOA GROSS AND NET ASSETS
Both gross and net assets associated with the MOA program are listed in
Appendices B and C as described in Section I.
MOA CURRENT MITIGATION DEBITS AND REQUIREMENTS
As of September 30, 2005, EEP has issued mitigation acceptance letters
for 47 NCDOT transportation projects that have yet to be permitted. Each
of these have been accepted using either HQP at 10: 1 ratios, a
combination of 5: 1 HQP and 1: 1 restoration mitigation commitment, or
2: 1 compensatory mitigation assets commitments. During the transition
period, the debit- due date for all issued permits was July 22, 2005 ( the end
of the transition period). The required debit- due date for compensatory
mitigation commitments is outlined in Section IX and Section X of the
Tri- Party MOA. For the first five years of the MOA, the debit due data
for mitigation occurs at the end of the MOA year when the permit
requiring mitigation is issued. Starting in MOA Year 6, the debit due date
shifts to the permit issuance date.
Appendix F is a series of six tables listing data for MOA Mitigation Acceptances,
Requirements, and Debits.
F1- Total List of EEP MOA Mitigation Acceptances ( List of Current
Commitments and Future MOA Year 3 Requirements) lists all current EEP
MOA mitigation acceptances that were not permitted by the end of the transition
period. Some of these acceptances were issued during the transition period but
permits have yet to be issued or received. Some acceptances were issued during
the current quarter. This list represents the total potential mitigation acceptances
that could potentially be permitted during MOA Year 3 and thus have additional
mitigation requirements at the end of the MOA Year. As of September 30, 2005,
EEP has received a permit from only one of these projects ( R- 2417BB) indicating
it will have mitigation due on July 22, 2006. The table also lists HQP sites used
and their pre- permitted debited amounts and compensatory mitigation
commitments made by EEP.
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2005 – September 30, 2005 9
F2- List of Current EEP MOA Year 3 Mitigation Requirements lists all
projects for which permits have been issued and received by EEP in MOA Year 3.
F3- List of Outstanding EEP MOA Mitigation Commitments lists projects in
which EEP has issued mitigation acceptance letters but permits have not yet been
issued/ received.
F4- Summary of Outstanding EEP MOA Mitigation Requirements due in
MOA Year 3 summarizes the outstanding restoration and restoration- equivalent
mitigation requirements based on permits issued for TIP and NCDOT Division
projects during MOA Year 3. The mitigation due date for these requirements will
be July 22, 2006.
F5- Summary of Outstanding EEP MOA Mitigation Commitments
summarizes the EEP restoration and restoration- equivalent mitigation
commitments of which the permits have not been received as of September 30,
2005. Mitigation commitments that have permits issued in MOA Year 3 will be
due on July 22, 2006. Projects that have permits issued in other time periods will
be due according to the requirements specified in Section X of the MOA.
F6- List of MOA Permit Requirements and Debits lists all mitigation
requirements that were due as of September 30, 2005 and the mitigation debits
that have been made to offset those requirements.
MOA FUTURE REQUIREMENTS - REMAINING NCDOT PROJECTED IMPACTS
Appendix G: MOA Future Requirements - Remaining NCDOT Projected Impacts is
a summary of the projected NCDOT transportation project impacts associated with the
NCDOT���s seven- year Transportation Improvement Plan ( TIP). Appendix G is
summarized by MOA impact Year, river basin, and CU. The data in Appendix G
originates from the original seven- year impact forecast submitted by NCDOT to EEP in
February 2005. Some of the individual project impact projections have been updated by
more recently collected field data. These revised impacts were submitted by NCDOT on
a project- by- project basis over the last quarter. Appendix G has also been updated to
show only the remaining forecasted impacts covering the seven- year projection time
period. In other words, since February 2005, many of the original forecasted impacts are
no longer forecasts as NCDOT has formally requested that EEP accept mitigation
responsibility for specific impacts associated with the transportation projects. Appendix
G shows only those projects where NCDOT has not yet to request mitigation or where
EEP has not yet formally accepted mitigation responsibility. NCDOT divisions were
unable to provide impacts by individual MOA Year. Instead, each division estimated a
lump- sum estimate for seven years. This lump sum amount was spread evenly through
each of the seven- year TIP years. Please note that there are still substantial amounts of
impacts that were projected to occur in the transition period, but NCDOT has not
formally requested EEP to provide the mitigation as of the end of this quarter.
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2005 – September 30, 2005 10
All projects that were projected to occur in MOA Years 1 or 2 that were not accepted or
permitted during the transition period are now included as MOA Year 3 impact
projections.
EEP expects to receive the new forecasted impacts in February 2006. NCDOT and the
North Carolina General Assembly are currently looking at options to ramp up the TIP to
historical levels. Major accelerations or volatility in the TIP impact projections will
obviously result in major changes to EEP’s potential mitigation requirements and EEP’s
procurement strategies.
MOA COMPLIANCE
During the current quarter, MOA compliance remained approximately the same
since the end of the transition period ( July 22, 2005) with no change in stream
compliance, a slight decrease in riverine wetland compliance, and a slight
increase in nonriverine wetland compliance. However, the total number of
permits with remaining outstanding mitigation dropped from nine permits to eight
permits during the current quarter.
At the end of the transition period, EEP had successfully mitigated for 97.1% of
all stream MOA requirements and 95.6% of all wetland MOA requirements. The
wetland compliance could be more specifically broken down by wetland type as
follows: 89.3% of all riverine requirements, 98% of all nonriverine requirements,
and 100% of all coastal marsh requirements were successfully mitigated during
the transition period.
As of September 30, 2005, stream compliance remained the same at 97.1 %,
riverine wetland compliance dropped slightly to 84.3%, and nonriverine wetland
compliance improved slightly but remained at 98%.
The magnitude of outstanding stream mitigation remained the same at 4,472.6
stream credits. The magnitude of outstanding riverine wetland mitigation
increased 4.34 credits ( from 9.30 to 13.64 credits). The magnitude of outstanding
nonriverine wetland mitigation decreased slightly by 0.02 credits ( from 4.53 to
4.51).
A complete listing of the MOA permit requirements not in full compliance is
listed in Appendix I: MOA Outstanding Permit Requirements. EEP’s Action
Strategies for outstanding mitigation requirements are detailed in Section VI.
MOA FUTURE EXPECTATIONS
MOA Compliance is expected to remain steady through the current MOA Year.
Substantial advanced mitigation has already been achieved for MOA Year 4 and
MOA Year 5. Appendix H: MOA Net Asset Balances ( Surplus and Deficits)
shows the progress that has been achieved as of September 30, 2005. To date,
EEP has instituted 335,704 surplus stream credits, 2,546 surplus riverine wetland
credits, 6,296 surplus nonriverine wetland credits, and 129.97 surplus coastal
marsh wetland credits. EEP is aggressively pursuing and instituting mitigation
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2005 – September 30, 2005 11
assets in preparation for the large NCDOT mitigation needs associated with MOA
Years 3, 4, and 5.
Two major improvements were accomplished during the current quarter. First,
the MOA permit requirements database was converted into an Access database
format. This should improve future permit tracking. Second, the process by
which all of EEP’s restoration, enhancement, creation, and preservation projects
are tracked has been improved by utilizing Access databases and new procedures
for updating credits based on the various phases of design, as- builts, and
monitoring results. These procedures will provide more accurate numbers
regarding the status and assets associated with these projects.
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2005 – September 30, 2005 12
SECTION III:
IN LIEU FEE ( ILF) MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ( MOU)
EEP ILF MOU ASSETS – GROSS AND NET ASSETS
Both Gross and Net remaining assets associated with the ILF MOU program are
listed in Appendices B and C, as described in Section I.
ILF MOU PRESENT AND FUTURE QUARTER MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS
The MOU program had 33 ILF transactions with 38 new requirements that
became due this quarter, representing 4,802 credits of stream, 3.53 credits of
riverine wetland, 10.50 credits of nonriverine wetland, and 0.00 credits of coastal
marsh requirements. A complete summary of the requirements that became due is
listed in Appendix J: MOU ILF Present and Future Quarter Mitigation
Requirements. Appendix J also lists requirements that will become due over the
next quarter. As mentioned during the last quarterly report, the requirements
associated with the last and future quarters represent a decrease in the amount of
stream and wetland requirements that will become due from historical levels.
This decrease is a result of the NCDOT departing the ILF MOU program. Almost
all new NCDOT mitigation requirements are now being handled under the Tri-
Party MOA. During the current quarter, only six of the 33 transactions involved
NCDOT. These six represent older permits that were accepted into the ILF
program prior to the formation of EEP.
MOU NET ASSET BALANCES – Surplus and Deficits
Unlike the MOA program, the goal of which is to develop assets up to seven years
in advance of permitted impacts, the MOU program is designed to produce
mitigation assets one year after the permit has been issued.
Another major objective of the MOU program is to have an in- lieu fee appropriate
to pay the actual cost of restoration. Together, these two goals result in a delicate
balance of building assets in just the right sizes and just the right amounts in each
of the CUs to offset permitted requirements. In order to capitalize on efficiencies
of scale, restoration project sizes tend to be large. On the other hand, ILF
mitigation requirements tend to be very small. Thus there is always the potential
to create surplus assets in some CUs and deficits in other CUs. The MOU
program is at optimal performance when there are zero surplus assets and zero
requirement deficits, and zero remaining funds.
The current Net ILF program asset balances are shown in Appendix K: MOU
Asset Balances Through September 30, 2005. Note that the ILF program has
produced an overall surplus of 48,087 credits of stream, 136.10 credits of riverine
wetlands, 126.50 credits of nonriverine wetlands, and 3.54 credits of coastal
marsh wetlands. These surplus asset balances represent a significant increase
from the previous quarter. During the last quarter, the stream asset balance was
14,683 credits, the riverine wetlands asset balance was 117.07, the nonriverine
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2005 – September 30, 2005 13
wetlands asset balance was 132.92 credits, and the coastal marsh wetlands asset
balance was 4.44 credits.
MOU COMPLIANCE
The overall permit compliance increased slightly ( 1.35%) for the MOU program
during the current quarter. As of September 30, the MOU program had 474 total
requirements. Of these, 448 are compliant, seven are in partial compliance and 19
are in non- compliance. Therefore EEP has 94.51% of all MOU projects in
compliance, 1.48% in partial compliance and 4.01% in non- compliance.
During the previous quarter, 29 requirements had been in partial ( 10) or complete
noncompliance ( 19). Thus the MOU program met three more requirements than
were met during the last quarter, despite the addition of 50 new requirements.
Of these 26 non- compliant requirements, 17 were related to wetland requirements,
and nine were related to stream requirements. 255 of 264 stream requirements or
94.51% were compliant by the end of the quarter. Overall, wetland compliance is
similar at 91.41% ( 181 of 198). The number of stream requirements with
remaining mitigation needs decreased from 15 to nine in the current quarter.
The magnitude of outstanding stream requirements decreased significantly. At
the end of the last quarter, EEP had not met 26,342 credits of stream mitigation.
As of September 30, 2005, the remaining outstanding stream mitigation needs
were 12,582 stream credits or an improvement of 13,760 credits. This represents
over a 52% improvement in outstanding stream mitigation needs.
The magnitude of outstanding riverine requirements decreased from 27.0 wetland
credits to 24.4 wetland credits.
The magnitude of outstanding nonriverine requirements increased from 1.8 to 3.2
wetland credits.
Overall outstanding wetland needs decreased by 1.255 wetland credits during the
current quarter.
A complete listing of the permit requirements not in full compliance is listed in
Appendix L: MOU Outstanding Permit Requirements. A narrative addressing
EEP action plans for non- compliant CUs is included in this report in Section VI.
MOU FUTURE EXPECTATIONS
The status of the MOU program is expected to continue to improve over the
course of the fiscal year though some small fluctuations may be expected during
the next two quarters as many of the expected new MOU restoration and
enhancement projects are not expected to be instituted until the fourth quarter.
Additional buying and selling of excess assets between the MOA and MOU
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2005 – September 30, 2005 14
programs is expected to continue. These transactions will result in improved
compliance capabilities for both programs.
Two major improvements were accomplished during the current quarter. First,
the MOU permit requirements database was converted into an Access database
format. This should improve future permit tracking. Second, the process by
which all of EEP’s restoration, enhancement, creation, and preservation projects
are tracked has been improved by utilizing Access databases and new procedures
for updating credits based on the various phases of design, as- built, and
monitoring results. These procedures will provide more accurate numbers
regarding the status and assets associated with these projects.
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2005 – September 30, 2005 15
SECTION IV:
PLANNING
WATERSHED PLANNING FOR PROJECTED IMPACTS
During this quarter, EEP initiated consultant scoping for amendments to several
existing project- development contracts ( LWP’s), including:
• Fast track LWP services for the upper Broad basin, CU # 03050105
• Re- start of the Little River and Brush Creek LWP contract, Phases II and III
( detailed assessment of sub- watershed conditions and
identification/ prioritization of watershed restoration projects)
• Phase IV effort for the Stoney Creek LWP contract ( landowner contact and
development of projects identified in Phases II and III of the LWP)
During this quarter, EEP executed several new project- development contracts
( LWP’s), including:
• Phase I for the Lockwoods Folly River LWP [ Preliminary Characterization of
Local Watershed Conditions and Recommendations for Additional Field Data
Collection and Analysis]
• Phase I for the Fishing Creek LWP [ Preliminary Characterization of Local
Watershed Conditions and Recommendations for Additional Field Data
Collection and Analysis]
• Phase I for the Havelock LWP [ Preliminary Characterization of Local
Watershed Conditions and Recommendations for Additional Field Data
Collection and Analysis]
During this quarter, EEP completed several ongoing project- development ( LWP)
efforts, including:
• Development of Stream Assessment Methods in Eastern North Carolina
• Local Watershed Planning for the Middle Tar- Pamlico River Basin [ CU #
03020203]
• Identification of Stream and Wetland Restoration Opportunities in the Bear
Swamp Local Watershed
• Detailed Assessment of Conditions and Recommendations for the Swift Creek
Local Watershed
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2005 – September 30, 2005 16
Eco system Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2005 – September 30, 2005 17
SECTION V:
MONITORING
The Monitoring Section of EEP currently has 54 projects under monitoring
contract. These contracts are primarily for projects in their second year or later of
monitoring. The primary tasks of monitoring staff during this quarter were
maintenance oversight on projects and site visits to projects in the monitoring
stage. In addition, staff attended close- out meetings with NCDOT personnel on a
few projects that were transferred to EEP. Monitoring staff also performed or
were involved in the following tasks during this period:
• Coordinated a group of five researchers from two universities and one state
agency to determine the rough outline of an entirely new vegetation
monitoring, data storage, and data analysis system for EEP.
• Coordinated and provided an all- day vegetation training session for the
Implementation section of EEP.
• Coordinated the establishment of a vegetation- related section on the EEP web
site, which will help the Implementation Section, contractors and designers
improve the quality of our projects.
• Ordered and distributed all groundwater monitoring gauges for EEP.
Eco system Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2005 – September 30, 2005 18
SECTION VI:
EEP COMPLIANCE ACTION STRATEGIES BY CU
MOU Action Strategies for Non- Compliant Cataloging Units
CATAWBA 03050101
Outstanding Mitigation Required
Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent
Streams 2,522 6,032
Riparian 2.36 0
Non- Riparian 2.38 0.18
Coastal Marsh 0 0
Background:
Catawba 03050101 has historically been a high impact CU. There have been 49
requirements paid and now due in MOU Program ( 40 stream, 8 riparian, and 1
nonriparian). The MOA program has 11 requirements ( 6 stream and 2 riparian wetland,
and three nonriparian wetland). The number of requests is not surprising since Catawba
03050101 is one of the largest CUs in the state and is one of the faster growing areas in
the state.
These outstanding requirements are new to this quarter. During the last quarter, no
outstanding stream mitigation needs existed; however, 7.1 MOU riparian wetland credits
were outstanding but have now been met. During the last quarter, EEP actually had 609
surplus stream credits. The new stream mitigation needs are primarily a result of asset
reductions that occurred to two sites in Catawba 03050103. Each sites had landowner
issues that effectively reduced the project size, and on one of the sites, a potential
hazardous dump was discovered that further reduced the length of the project. As a
consequence of these asset reductions, assets in Catawba 03050101 were utilized to offset
the older MOU requirements in Catawba 03050103 that had previous authorization by the
USACE and N. C. Division of Water Quality ( DWQ) to utilize southern Catawba
03050101 assets ( per May 21, 2004 regulatory letter to EEP.)
EEP has been tremendously successful at implementing stream project in Catawba
03050101 having instituted over 113,000 feet of stream restoration, enhancement,
creation, and preservation projects ( not including High Quality Preservation) in the CU.
The current outstanding stream mitigation needs are considered only to be an
unanticipated temporal problem and should be remedied within the next couple of
quarters as new restoration projects are instituted. EEP has already acquired sufficient
properties on South Muddy Creek and Hoppers Creek to meet approximately 8,000 of the
outstanding stream credits. However, the institution date of these projects are not
expected to occur until Quarter 3 or Quarter 4, as these projects will likely be going
through the State’s Request For Services administrative process because the projects are
large and will likely be unable to be implemented through the present On- Call contract
process.
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2005 – September 30, 2005 19
As stated in the last quarter, riparian mitigation in Catawba 01 is difficult to offset since
the average size of wetlands in the Piedmont is between three and five acres. However,
EEP has been successful at acquiring riverine mitigation projects through the Full
Delivery Process and is actively pursuing these sites through its watershed planning
efforts. The long- term outlook for this CUremains positive. At this time, there appear to
be some stream and wetland mitigation opportunities in the CU.
CU Immediate Action Plan:
The current action plan for this CU is to implement the two acquired properties along
South Muddy Creek and Hoppers Creek to meet approximately 8,000 of the outstanding
stream mitigation needs. EEP plans to utilize the existing Local Watershed Plans and
project staff to identify and implement stream projects sufficient to offset the remaining
stream, riparian, and nonriparian wetland mitigation needs. EEP reissued a Full Delivery
RFP request for 25 riparian and 5 nonriparian wetland credits in this CU during the
quarter to offset the mitigation needs for the MOU and MOA programs. A successful
proposal for this solicitation would completely satisfy all requirements in this CU.
CU Long- Range Action Plan:
The primary strategy for stream in this CU is for the EEP Implementation Section to
acquire and implement identified Tier II, III and untiered sites. The primary strategy for
wetlands is to procure mitigation through the FDP process and to complete and
implement the Lower Creek LWP. Other strategies being implemented include
purchasing additional stream and wetland HQP or Preservation Restoration Equivalents
( RE’s), requesting adjacent CU policy for wetlands, assessing whether older projects
restored/ created nonriverine credits that can be used for credits, and potential
implementation of the results of the alternative mitigation committee.
Notes: EEP issued a RFP for riverine wetland restoration projects in 2004; received and
accepted proposals for 19.5 ac. riverine restoration. In 2004, EEP requested 80,000
credits stream, 75 credits riverine, and five credits nonriverine, and accepted proposals of
25,103 and 5.3 credits riverine. The ILF MOU program is allowed to use credits located
southern half of Catawba 01 for impacts to Catawba 03 ( per regulatory letter to EEP).
LWP: Lower Creek LWP
Tier II/ III restoration: 23,000 total potential credits
o Mecklenburg County non- tiered ( 8,000 ft.)
o Caldwell County TIII ( 1,500 ft.)
o Caldwell County TII ( 3,500 ft.)
o Caldwell TIII ( 10,000 ft restoration)
o Burke County ( large tract feasibility study underway potential Tier III unknown
credits)
HQP: 521 total stream credits ( 380 Tier I and 141 Tier II - these credits are split
between CP, NM, and SP);
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2005 – September 30, 2005 20
0.16 total riverine credits ( 0.16 Tier I - these credits are split between CP and
SP)
CATAWBA 03050103
Outstanding Mitigation Required
Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent
Streams 557 0
Riparian 3.85 4.17
Non- Riparian 0 0
Coastal Marsh 0 0
Background
Catawba 03050103 has been identified as a critical CU watershed in the state by EEP, as
it is a very difficult CU to produce compensatory mitigation for streams and wetlands.
The Catawba 03050103 is comprised mostly of the Greater Charlotte metropolitan area.
Most streams in Catawba 03050103 are degraded and have experienced the growing
pains of 200 years of urbanization and, more recently, suburban sprawl. Urbanization
presents challenges in producing stream mitigation projects due to the heavy constraints
often in place along these streams. Typical constraints include sewer lines along and in
the streams; residential, industrial and commercial development in the floodplain; FEMA
regulated streams; hazardous waste; storm water outlets; unknown pipe outlets; local
ordinances; leaking sewer lines; chemical spills; local landfills within the stream; the
relative large size of streams per acre watershed; large numbers of landowners per
potential project site; etc. Each of these constraints limits the type and size of the
potential stream restoration project, and also significantly increase the cost of these
projects. Nevertheless, EEP has worked closely with Mecklenburg County and the City
of Charlotte to produce adequate stream mitigation projects up until the last quarter for
the MOU program. Since impacts are continuing at a rapid rate, it is unlikely that the
EEP program can continue to produce traditional stream- mitigation projects as the same
rate that mitigation requirements are being produced. This will likely become more
apparent within the MOA program, as NCDOT’s current and projected impacts are very
large within this CU.
Wetlands restoration is extremely limited within this CU. Currently, nearly all of
remaining wetlands within the CU are located along large river floodplains, or are
relatively small mafic- type depressional wetlands. These wetlands are continually being
impacted as development and urbanization is occurring at very high levels within this
CU. Restoration opportunities for these types of wetlands do not exist in any significant
quantity within this CU. Most of the historical wetlands loss is currently occupied either
by development or located along riparian systems. Wetland restoration is not feasible in
locations where development currently exists. Wetlands restoration along riparian
systems is also typically not possible because the streams are regulated under stringent
FEMA no- rise regulations. In order to perform most riparian wetlands restoration, the
stream level often needs to be elevated so that the stream can access its historic
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2005 – September 30, 2005 21
floodplain. FEMA and local regulations make this exceedingly difficult in most of this
CU. Also, raising flood elevations is problematic because of the amount of floodplain
development located in this CU. Finally, locating suitable wetlands- restoration
opportunities has been made more difficult because of the soil mapping in Mecklenburg
County. The current Mecklenburg Division of Soil and Water soil map has not indicated
any hydric A soils. While hydric A soils certainly exist in Mecklenburg, the maps do not
detail their locations. Typically floodplains are mapped as Monacan soils, which often
have hydric inclusions.
Another problem associated with wetlands restoration within this CU is the amount of
time it will take for a specific wetlands- restoration project to be constructed. Due to
FEMA and local regulations, most wetlands projects will need to undergo a long flood-level
modeling and evaluation period. The result is one to three additional years to
complete construction beyond projects that do not require this level of modeling.
The overall degree of difficulty in identifying stream and wetlands restoration
opportunities is reflected in the results of the last four Requests for Proposals issued by
the EEP and Wetlands Restoration Program. After five RFP requests, EEP/ WRP has
received zero wetland project submittals and only two small stream projects. The stream
projects were located along the outer edge of the developing regions. The last four
requests have received no response.
Historically, there have been 38 requirements paid and now due in the MOU Program in
Catawba 03050103. Of these, 31 have been stream requirements, six riparian
requirements and one nonriparian requirement. The MOA program has had no
requirements due in Catawba 03 as of September 30, 2005.
Stream and nonriparian wetland compliance actually improved slightly this quarter and
riparian wetland compliance dropped slightly. These improvements were primarily a
result of utilization of Catawba 03050101 assets. Stream assets in 03050103 actually had
asset reductions on two sites. Each site had landowner issues that effectively reduced the
project size and on one of the sites, a potential hazardous dump was discovered that
further reduced the length of the project. As a consequence of these asset reductions,
assets in Catawba 03050101 were utilized to offset the older MOU requirements in
Catawba 03050103 that had previous authorization by the USACE and DWQ to utilize
southern Catawba 03050101 assets ( per May 21, 2004 regulatory letter to EEP.)
CU Immediate Action Plan:
As stated in the background section above, the lower Catawba CU is a chronic problem
and critical watershed for implementing stream and wetland mitigation projects due to the
urban nature of the CU, local and federal laws, and flooding concerns. Also, there is very
little opportunity for high quality wetland restoration projects. The EEP is relying on a
number of traditional and alternative strategies to meet this need.
1. EEP issued an RFP for 15,000 stream credits, 25 riverine credits, and five
nonriverine credits during the quarter. However, EEP believes that
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2005 – September 30, 2005 22
traditional mitigation potential is limited in the CU and does not expect
many submittals for review.
2. Implementation of nontraditional projects based on the Charlotte Local
Watershed Planning Initiative. Numerous sites identified through this
planning effort have yielded nontraditional wetland and stream mitigation
opportunities. Sites have been reviewed during the last quarter. EEP needs
more guidance on credit potential of these sites. EEP has formed an
Alternative Mitigation Steering Committee and multiple technical work
teams to investigate developing, crediting, and utilizing nontraditional forms
of mitigation. The Alternative Mitigation Steering Committee presented
some functional/ credit studies completed by EEP to the Program
Assessment and Consistency Group Technical Committee ( PACG- TC)
during the current quarter.
3. Evaluation of the CU for wetlands- preservation opportunities that may be
able to provide some mitigation credit towards the wetland deficits.
Planning has identified multiple preservation sites and is directing local
watershed planning to identify and assess these sites. EEP requests approval
and guidance letter from USACE and DWQ on using preservation for
mitigation in the CU to offset restoration needs.
4. Use existing or generate new assets in the lower portion of Catawba
03050101. EEP has approval from USACE ( reference letter May 21, 2004
from Ken Jolly to Bill Gilmore) to use wetlands assets in the lower portion
of Catawba 03050101 to offset these deficits. EEP currently has no
additional assets in Catawba 01 that could be used for mitigation needs in
Catawba 03. The last Full Delivery RFP in Catawba 01 yielded fewer
wetlands than anticipated. EEP is also issuing a new FDP request in
Catawba 01 to address wetland needs in Catawba 01 and 03.
5. Evaluation of wetlands restoration on Chewacla soils. EEP has discussed
with USACE the possibility of pursuing wetlands restoration sites with
Chewacla soil types in association with priority one stream restoration
opportunities. No new sites were identified during the last quarter.
HIWASSEE 06020002
Background:
The Hiwasse River Basin has historically been an area of limited activity for EEP.
As a result it has taken the program more time to develop restoration projects. At
the end of the Transition Period, the EEP did not have the restoration available to
supplement the High Quality Preservation used to cover impacts during the
Transition. Until the restoration has been instituted, the EEP is continuing to
cover the affected permit with 10: 1 preservation.
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2005 – September 30, 2005 23
Outstanding Mitigation Required
Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent
Streams 2,348 0
Riparian 0.82 0
Non- Riparian 0 0
Coastal Marsh 0 0
CU Immediate Action Plan:
The EEP currently has three projects totaling approximately 12,000 feet of stream
restoration for which land- acquisition negotiations are underway. Once these
projects are acquired, design will begin and the assets will be instituted. EEP will
evaluate these projects to determine whether riparian wetland restoration
opportunities are available as well. It appears that two of the projects may offer
such opportunities.
CU Long- Range Action Plan:
The EEP is developing a Local Watershed Plan in this CU in partnership with the
Hiwassee River Watershed Coalition to continue to develop quality restoration
opportunities to meet current and future needs in this CU.
LITTLE TENNESSEE 06010203
Background:
Two quarters ago, the first ILF requirement for 288 linear feet came due in this CU. The
use of the ILF program for this river basin is a new activity.
Very small impacts in remote CUs that have little to no activity can be problematic for
the ILF program for two main reasons. First, EEP builds projects that average about
3,000 feet for streams, five acres for riparian wetlands, and 10 acres for nonriparian
wetlands. ( There are some geographic variations to these averages.) Since the ILF
program charges the average cost of mitigation for each applicant paying into the
program, the ILF program does not have sufficient dollars to build surplus credits in these
remote regions. Therefore, there is a balancing act in terms of managing the funding and
producing sufficient mitigation projects to adequately offset mitigation needs. Also,
some CUs in the state are experiencing heavy activity and heavy mitigation demands.
Because of the relative needs of other CUs, EEP will often prioritize where to place its
staff and monetary resources in order to maximize the effectiveness of the ILF program.
Thus, very small deficits in remote CUs that experience little activity are expected in the
ILF program from time to time. EEP has recommended to the USACE and the DWQ
that new policies need to be developed to appropriately evaluate how and when EEP
should address these small impacts.
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2005 – September 30, 2005 24
Outstanding Mitigation Required
Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent
Streams 144 144
Riparian 0 0
Non- Riparian 0 0
Coastal Marsh 0 0
CU Immediate Action Plan:
The EEP has issued a full delivery RFP for this CU to offset the outstanding mitigation as
well as to address upcoming MOA needs. The request is for 15,000 linear feet of stream
restoration, three acres of riverine wetland restoration, and five acres of non- riverine
wetland restoration. Proposals related to this RFP are due on March 14, 2006. Assuming
that the program receives proposals that meet staff reviews of technical merit and cost,
EEP will fund a stream project with ILF dollars to offset these outstanding needs and thus
satisfy this requirement.
LUMBER 03040203
Background:
Historically there has been very little activity in this CU. To date, only five MOU
requirements and seven MOA requirements have been accepted and become due in
Lumber 03040203. Of these, three were stream, seven were riparian wetland, and three
were nonriparian. The sum of each of these requirements was fairly small in magnitude
with one moderately large stream impact. Consequently, little project development has
been needed to provide sufficient projects to offset requirements. During the current
quarter, two projects experienced asset changes based on changed restoration designs.
These changes reduced the number of riparian and nonriparian wetland credits available
to offset mitigation requirements and resulted in the current outstanding mitigation needs.
Middle Swamp Creek will only be a stream restoration and Bush Island is only a
nonriparian preservation project. Before these design changes, asset totals were expected
to provide enough mitigation to address mitigation needs through MOA Year 4. Thus,
the outstanding mitigation needs are new to this quarter and were unanticipated.
However, mitigation opportunities exist within the watershed and replacement mitigation
is seen only as a temporal problem.
Outstanding Mitigation Required
Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent
Streams 0 0
Riparian 9.95 3.51
Non- Riparian 0 0
Coastal Marsh 0 0
Action Plan:
The current Action Plan for this CU is to initiate Phase 3 of the Bear Swamp
Local Watershed Plan for this CU ( currently in Phase 2) and to use the LWP to
identify sufficient new stream and riverine mitigation sites. The Implementation
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2005 – September 30, 2005 25
Section will acquire and implement stream and riverine projects identified in the
LWP using the Design- Bid- Build ( DBB) process.
LWP: Bear Swamp Local Watershed Plan for this CU ( currently in Phase II).
Stream:
Tier II/ III restoration: 2,200 total potential credits ( 0R and 2,200RE)
o Singleton Tier III ( 11,000 stream preservation)
HQP: 215 total credits ( 0 Tier I and 215 Tier II SP)
Strategy:
o Initiate Phase III of the Bear Swamp Local Watershed Plan
o LWP identify 12,000 ft. stream restoration and restoration equivalents
projects ( sufficient to meet needs through Year 5).
o Implementation acquire and implement three stream restoration projects to
meet Y5 needs using DBB process
Wetland Riverine:
HQP: 24.346 total credits ( 24.346 Tier I and 0 Tier II) ( in SICP and SP)
Strategy:
o LWP identify three credits riverine projects ( sufficient to meet needs
through Year 5
o Implementation acquire and implement one riverine restoration projects to
meet Year 5 needs using the DBB process
LUMBER 03040204
Background:
The Lumber 03040204 Cataloging Unit is an extremely low activity CU. Since
the inception of the Wetlands Restoration Program in 1996, no entity has utilized
the MOU program for streams or wetlands. The MOA program had one permit
with a requirement for 0.28 credits of nonriverine mitigation in during the
transition period. This outstanding requirement is new to this quarter.
Outstanding Mitigation Required
Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent
Streams 0 0
Riparian 0.14 0.14
Non- Riparian 0 0
Coastal Marsh 0 0
Action Plan:
Due to the relative lack of historical activity for EEP in the watershed, EEP issued a
Request for Full Delivery in this CU during the quarter for 5,000 stream, 16 riverine
wetland, and five nonriverine wetland credits. These amounts were expected to cover
NCDOT projected mitigation needs through MOA Year 4 in the CU as well as the
immediate outstanding needs. EEP expects the RFP to be successful.
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2005 – September 30, 2005 26
NEUSE 03020202
Background:
EEP has one MOU permit in non- compliance for which all mitigation needs have not
been met ( part of the needs associated with the permit have been provided). The
remaining need is presented in the table below.
Outstanding Mitigation Required
Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent
Streams 562 1,242
Riparian 0 0
Non- Riparian 0 0
Coastal Marsh 0 0
CU Immediate Action Plan:
The EEP has been developing a large stream restoration project ( 10,000 lf) in this CU.
Due to the project’s size and complexity, achieving institution has taken a significant
amount of time. Institution of this project is expected in the third quarter.
PASQUOTANK 03010205
Background:
The Pasquotank 03010205 has historically had very little activity in regard to stream
mitigation and wetland mitigation; however, recent activity has been very high. Despite
this, the magnitude of mitigation remains low ( i. e., most mitigation requirements are
small to very small in magnitude). To date, 22 MOU and eight MOA requirements have
been paid and become due in Pasquotank 03010205 and all of the stream requirements
have been met with a single stream mitigation project ( Watts Property.) As this
mitigation project progressed through the design phase, the total length of the project was
shortened due to project constraints, thus leaving the CU 47 stream credits short. As a
result of the change, one permit became non- compliant due to insufficient stream
mitigation credits.
Outstanding Mitigation Required
Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent
Streams 0 47
Riparian 0 0
Non- Riparian 0 0
Coastal Marsh 0 0
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2005 – September 30, 2005 27
Action Plan:
Currently, a FRP is under advertisement for 5,000 stream mitigation credits in the
Pasquotank 03010205. Bids are due on April 12, 2006. If any mitigation sites submitted
are viable, EEP anticipates that contracts will be executed by the fourth quarter ( 2005-
2006) or the first quarter ( 2006- 2007.) This action will completely satisfy the
outstanding requirements. Additionally, EEP is developing several potential stream
mitigation projects through the Design Bid Build program. EEP anticipates at least one
of the stream mitigation projects to be instituted within the next few months. Also, EEP
anticipates acquiring additional stream mitigation assets through the HQP program that
can be utilized for the restoration equivalent mitigation needs.
Tier II/ III restoration:
o Perry Property ( UT to Pembroke), Tier II ( 2,700 feet restoration)
o Jenny’s Gut, Tier II ( 3,000 feet restoration)
HQP: 5,483 total credits ( 855 Tier I, 4,628 Tier II)
68.267 total riverine credits ( 41.887 Tier I, 26.380 Tier II)
ROANOKE 03010103
Background:
The Roanoke 03010103 has been similar to the Pasquotank in that there has historically
been very little mitigation needs and subsequent activity in this CU. Up until this quarter,
EEP was compliant for stream mitigation. To date, only one MOU and one MOA
requirement have been paid and become due in Roanoke 03010103 and until this quarter,
there were no mitigation requirements in this CU. All of the current requirements in this
CU are for stream mitigation.
Outstanding Mitigation Required
Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent
Streams 358 139
Riparian 0 0
Non- Riparian 0 0
Coastal Marsh 0 0
Action Plan:
Currently, a Full Delivery RFP is under advertisement for 8,000 stream mitigation credits
and seven riverine wetland mitigation credits in the Roanoke 03010103. The bid
packages are due on March 15, 2006. If any sites mitigation submitted are viable, EEP
anticipates that contracts will be executed by fourth quarter ( 2005- 2006) or the first
quarter ( 2006- 2007). and will completely satisfy this outstanding requirement.
Additionally, EEP is developing a potential stream mitigation project through the Design
Bid Build program and anticipates the project will be instituted within the next few
months. Also, EEP anticipates acquiring additional stream mitigation assets through the
HQP program that can be utilized for the restoration equivalent mitigation needs.
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2005 – September 30, 2005 28
Tier II/ III restoration:
o UT to N. Double Creek TII ( 1,688 feet stream restoration, 4,050 feet
stream enhancement)
HQP: 3,565 total stream credits ( 80 Tier I, 3,485 Tier II)
0.363 total riverine credits ( 0.322 Tier I, 0.041 Tier II)
TAR- PAMLICO 03020105
Outstanding Mitigation Required
Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent
Streams 146 0
Riparian 0 0
Non- Riparian 0.52 0
Coastal Marsh 0 0
Background:
The Tar Pamlico 03020105 cataloging unit has seen virtually no activity since the
inception of the Wetlands Restoration Program in 1996. Currently, the MOU program
has only accepted conservation easements as mitigation on behalf of the USACE. The
MOU program has zero stream, riparian or nonriparian mitigation requirements due.
However, this status will change soon, as recent activity has been very high: one
riparian, 15 nonriparian and one coastal marsh payments have been made during the last
year that will come due over the next few quarters. Although activity has been high, the
magnitude is very small. The 17 future requirements total 3.2 credits of mitigation. The
MOA program had one small stream and one small nonriparian requirement associated
with one permit come due in the current quarter. The permit is currently covered with
10: 1 High Quality Preservation assets but the remaining restoration requirement is
outstanding.
CU Action Plan:
The primary plan for this CU is to utilize the Full Delivery Process to meet current and
future needs. During the quarter, EEP issued a Full Delivery RFP to procure 5,000
stream, 5 riparian, 10 nonriparian, and 16 coastal marsh credits. The coastal marsh
request is only for the Dare County portion of Tar- Pamlico 03020105. This request is
intended to offset all current and future needs for the MOU and MOA programs through
MOA Year 5. Submittals are expected in the third quarter and institution of assets are
anticipated in Quarter 4 ( 2005- 2006) or Quarter 1 of ( 2006- 2007). Successful response to
this RFP will completely satisfy all requirements in this CU.
Notes: Bonner Bridge project is a future MOA projected impact. The PACG- TC is looking at coastal
issues that may affect this CU in the future.
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2005 – September 30, 2005 29
WHITE OAK 03030001
Background:
The White Oak/ Cape Fear 03030001 is one of the most unusual CUs in North
Carolina in that it is one of only four CUs ( out of 54) that have boundary overlap
problems with the State River Basin Boundaries. For accounting purposes, EEP
references this CU within the White Oak River Basin because the majority of the
CU is located in the basin. The Natural Resource Conservation Service ( NRCS)
is currently examining redrawing the boundaries for this CU to ensure that it is
completely located within the basin. NRCS is also considering renumbering this
CU. This CU is also unusual in that it is composed mostly of a series of
independent watersheds that are actually connected to either the Cape Fear or the
White Oak. It is also unusual in that it runs parallel to the coast.
EEP issued a RFP intended to offset all of the outstanding mitigation needs for
this CU during November 2004. Unfortunately, there was no response to that CU
request. Based on interviews and surveys with the private mitigation providers,
this CU was not addressed primarily because it was geographically remote, a
minimum amount was requested, and their focus was on other areas in the state
where more substantial RFPs had been requested. This indicates that future
requests may still be productive because the lack of response was not based on the
lack of restoration opportunities.
Outstanding Mitigation Required
Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent
Streams 902 1,913
Riparian 6.12 3.23
Non- Riparian 3.65 0.5
Coastal Marsh 0 0
Action Plan:
The stream requirement was compliant at one time as EEP had acquired an option
on the Pine Valley Country Club stream restoration project. However, for a
variety of reasons ( land owner interests, excessive construction bids) this project
has been deemed unviable and will no longer be pursued. This determination
regarding project viability was made in December of 2005 when the Pine Valley
Country Club Board of Directors voted not to renew an expired option agreement.
Until that time, the EEP was hopeful that the project would move forward.
EEP has five ongoing initiatives to meet the outstanding mitigation:
• EEP reissued an RFP for stream, riparian wetland and nonriparian wetlands in this
CU and has received submittals of 12,150 stream credits, 3.3 riverine credits, and
23.1 nonriverine credits. Institution of assets from this RFP are expected to occur
over the next two quarters that will offset the remaining stream need.
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2005 – September 30, 2005 30
• The Jacksonville Country Club stream- restoration project will include stormwater
wetlands which could generate wetland credit. However, credit potential and
ratios still need to be determined.
• The EEP is actively searching for sites in this area with local resource agents.
Several potential projects have been identified.
• EEP has issued a Full Delivery RFP’s for 5,000 feet of stream and 17 acres of
riverine mitigation to provide for anticipated needs, as well as those needs not met
as a result of the last RFP. Proposals are due April 12, 2006 and these credits will
likely be unavailable until the fourth quarter.
• Finally, EEP is initiating a Local Watershed Plan that will produce stream,
riverine and nonriverine credits for both present and future MOU and MOA
needs.
YADKIN 03040105
Background:
Yadkin 03040105 is similar in some ways to Catawba 03050103. Yadkin 03040105 does
not have many wetlands restoration opportunities present within the CU. It is also
experiencing some of the same development pressures that are present in the lower
Catawba. Yadkin 03040105 includes portions of Charlotte, Huntersville, Mooresville,
Davidson, Concord, Kannapolis, Monroe, Mint Hill and other smaller towns. It should
be considered a CU of concern for future wetlands- restoration efforts. The Yadkin
0304105 is different than the lower Catawba in that it has more rural landscape remaining
within the watershed and is larger. EEP has invested heavily in local watershed planning
in the Yadkin 0304105 and expects to generate many stream and some wetlands projects
from these endeavors in the future.
Outstanding Mitigation Required
Description Restoration Restoration Equivalent
Streams 0 0
Riparian 2.48 1.31
Non- Riparian 0.23 0.23
Coastal Marsh 0 0
Action Plan:
Previously, the Action Plan for this CU was to utilize a Full Delivery RFP. The RFP
noted did generate submittals for stream restoration, but not for wetland restoration.
To develop additional mitigation assets in Yadkin 05, EEP is using a multi- pronged
approach. EEP is planning to expand the Rocky River LWP to a Phase IV, acquire and
implement existing Tier II and III projects; identify and implement using the DBB
process at least 3 additional stream restoration projects, and one to four riverine wetland
projects sufficient to cover remaining projected needs through Year 5; maximize use of
existing HQP credits; and reevaluate potential 70,000 foot preservation project ( Rowan
County). The EEP Monitoring section is also investigating whether the Cato project
produced nonriverine or riverine credits as a component of the priority one stream
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2005 – September 30, 2005 31
restoration project. The EEP also intends to propose to use the Adjacent CU Guidance
for Yadkin 05, as this CU is a well- documented, challenging area to produce wetland
mitigation. Lastly, EEP has issued another full- delivery RFP for the CU requesting
45,000 feet of stream restoration, 26 acres of riverine restoration and 10 acres of non-riverine
restoration.
Tier II/ III restoration projects:
o Cabarrus County ( 24,000 ft. stream restoration; MOA listing)
o Cabarrus County ( 2,000 ft. stream restoration, 5,000 ft. Enhancement 1,
5000 preservation, 1 non- riverine restoration, 1.9 non- riverine
enhancement, 10 NR preservation) ( MOA)
o Cabarrus County Tier II ( 2,300 ft. stream restoration)
o Mecklenburg County Tier III ( 1,500 ft. stream restoration)
o Cabarrus County Tier III ( 3,500 stream restoration)
o Mecklenburg County Tier III ( 9,000 stream restoration, 15 acres riverine
restoration)
o Mecklenburg County Tier III ( 3 acres non- riverine restoration)
o Mecklenburg County Ecological Preserve TIII ( unknown potential credits)
HQP: 25,013 stream credits ( 15,007 TI, 10,006 TII)
5.69 Tier I riverine credits ( all in Southern Piedmont)
0.40 Tier I non- riverine credits
o Reassess potential 70,000 ft. mixed preservation project ( in Rowan
County)
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Quarterly Report July 1, 2005 – September 30, 2005 32
Appendix A: EEP Gross Asset List of Tier 1 Restoration, Enhancement, Creation, and Preservation Sites Alphabetically * ( High Quality
Preservation Sites are not listed in table below)
Project Name
Tier
River Basin
8- digit CU
Stream Restoration
Stream Enhancment I
Stream Enhancement II
Stream Preservation
Riverine Restoration
Riverine Creation
Riverine Enhancement
Riverine Preservation
Nonriverine Restoration
Nonriverine Creation
Nonriverine Enhancement
Nonriverine Preservation
Coastal Marsh Restoration
Coastal Marsh Creation
Coastal Marsh Enhancement
Coastal Marsh Preservation
Stream Buffer
Abbott 1 NEUSE 03020201 584
ABC 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020104 4,107 110 19.00
Afton Run 1 YADKIN 03040105 261
Back Creek 1 YADKIN 03040105 3,773 0.34 3.51
Bailey Fork ( EBX) ( 16- D04006) 1 CATAWBA 03050101 6,017 9,765 11.80 5.30
Bailey Fork II ( WRC) ( 16- D04006) 1 CATAWBA 03050101 5,500
Ballance Farm 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 196.27 49.65 40.25 50
Ballance Farm ( Buffer) 1 NEUSE 03020203 50.00
Barra Farms I 1 CAPE FEAR 03030005 160.51
Beamon's Run 1na NEUSE 03020203
Bear Creek 1 NEUSE 03020202 88.00 0.00 34.00 300.00
Bear Swamp Creek 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020101 1,500
Beaver Creek 1 YADKIN 03040101 4,300
Beaverdam Creek 1 CATAWBA 03050101 10,139 3,528 2,409
Benbow Park 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 1,752
Benson Grove 1 NEUSE 03020201 0.00
Bethel Church 1 YADKIN 03040101 0.00
Big Bull Creek 1 NEUSE 03020201 35.00
Billy's Creek 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020101 1,970
Bishop Road ( 1 mi to CU 05) 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020104 1 61.60 112.6 521 3.3
Black Gum Creek 1 LUMBER 03040203 10,000
Blue Mitigation Site 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 120.35
BMP ( Town of Cary) 1 NEUSE 03020201
Bogue Sound 1 WHITE OAK 03020106 0.18
Bold Run Creek 1 NEUSE 03020201 1,800 4.50
Branson Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 2,000
Briles 1 YADKIN 03040103 1,375 1,200 1.00
Brock 1 NEUSE 03020204 1,485 1.65 6.35
Brogden Road 1 NEUSE 03020201 15.00
Brown Bark Park 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 2,748
Brown Branch 1 CATAWBA 03050101 5,400
Brown Farm 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 0 21.62 4.80 9.92
Brush Creek 1 NEW 05050001 1,350 490 1,750
Brushy Fork 1 YADKIN 03040101 7,400
Bryan Blvd/ Oakridge 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002
1 of 55 Updated 09/ 30/ 2005
Appendix A: EEP Gross Asset List of Tier 1 Restoration, Enhancement, Creation, and Preservation Sites Alphabetically * ( High Quality
Preservation Sites are not listed in table below)
Project Name
Tier
River Basin
8- digit CU
Stream Restoration
Stream Enhancment I
Stream Enhancement II
Stream Preservation
Riverine Restoration
Riverine Creation
Riverine Enhancement
Riverine Preservation
Nonriverine Restoration
Nonriverine Creation
Nonriverine Enhancement
Nonriverine Preservation
Coastal Marsh Restoration
Coastal Marsh Creation
Coastal Marsh Enhancement
Coastal Marsh Preservation
Stream Buffer
Bugaboo Creek 1 YADKIN 03040101 6,600
Bull Farm 1 CAPE FEAR 03030006 2.18
Burnt Mill Creek 1na CAPE FEAR 03030007 0.80
Bush Island 1 LUMBER 03040203 300
Caldwell Station/ Foley/ EcoPark 1 CATAWBA 03050101 2,500 2.50 5.00
Camp Branch @ Bishop Site 1 YADKIN 03040105 3,204 1,042 3,974 6
Camp Lejune USMC 1 WHITE OAK 03030001 0.00
Cane Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 2,330
Carbonton Dam 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 90,484
Casey Dairy 1 NEUSE 03020202 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 72.00
Casey Tract 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 0
Cat Creek 1 LITTLE TENNESSEE 06010202 9,000 3.00 2.00
Cato 1 YADKIN 03040105 2,200
Caviness 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 1
Chapel Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 1,500
Charles Creek 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 0 1 0.9
Chavis Park 1 NEUSE 03020201 2,200
Cheviot Hills* 1 NEUSE 03020201 3,500 0.20
City Pond 1 YADKIN 03040201 10,667
Clayhill Farm 1 WHITE OAK 03020106 5,132 32.00 1.00 96.00
Clear Creek 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 1,500
Cleghorn Creek ( 16- D04010) 1 BROAD 03050105 5,167 0.00
Coddle Creek Tributary ( Indian Run) 1 YADKIN 03040105 1,700
Collington Cut 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205
Collins Site 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 9,786 1,070 750
Company Swamp 1 ROANOKE 03010107 557.43
Conetoe Creek 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020103 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00
Conoconnara Swamp 1 ROANOKE 03010107 4,800 1,000 78.00 45.00
Corbett Tract 1 LUMBER 03040207 0.00
Cox Property 1 NEUSE 03020204 0.00
Cox Site ( 16- D04008)) 1 NEUSE 03020201 7,263 285 0 0 26 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Croatan Mitigation Bank 1 NEUSE 03020204 49.60 45.80 7.60 1,435.20 991.80 72.20
Cross Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 2,400
Dale Tract 1 CAPE FEAR 03030005 126.30 17.90
Daniels Farm # 1 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020101 30.00
2 of 55 Updated 09/ 30/ 2005
Appendix A: EEP Gross Asset List of Tier 1 Restoration, Enhancement, Creation, and Preservation Sites Alphabetically * ( High Quality
Preservation Sites are not listed in table below)
Project Name
Tier
River Basin
8- digit CU
Stream Restoration
Stream Enhancment I
Stream Enhancement II
Stream Preservation
Riverine Restoration
Riverine Creation
Riverine Enhancement
Riverine Preservation
Nonriverine Restoration
Nonriverine Creation
Nonriverine Enhancement
Nonriverine Preservation
Coastal Marsh Restoration
Coastal Marsh Creation
Coastal Marsh Enhancement
Coastal Marsh Preservation
Stream Buffer
Daniels Farm # 2 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020101 12.00 3.50 10.90
Deaton 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 505
Deep Creek ( Harding) 1 YADKIN 03040101 5,500 30.4 10.68
Dismal Swamp 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 15.46 20.8 252.78 91
Dismal Swamp Full- Delivery( 16-
D04016)( aka Timberlake Farm) 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 180 275
Dowd Dairy 1 CAPE FEAR 03030005 5.80 500.95
Dula Thorofare @ Bishop Site 1 YADKIN 03040104 2,099 1,369 5,715 8.10
Dutchman's Creek 1 NEUSE 03020201 0.00 5.00
Dye Branch I Stormwater BMP 1na YADKIN 03040105 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Dye Branch II Stream Restoration 1 YADKIN 03040105 3,400 1,088
Eagle Brunswick 1 CAPE FEAR 03030005
East Tarboro Canal 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020103 2,989 1,876
Elizabeth City State BMP 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205
Elk Shoals RFP* 1 CATAWBA 03050101 5,168
Ellerbee Creek 1 NEUSE 03020201 6,279
Ephemeral Pool 1 LUMBER 03040204
Finley- McMillan 1 CAPE FEAR 03030007 0 398.00
Fisher River Mit. Bank ( Ring FDP) 1 YADKIN 03040101 2,376 25.50 5.40 1.35
Five Mile Branch 1 YADKIN 03040102 17,595 25.00 4.00 10.00 4.00
Fletcher- Meritor site 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 4,000 2.00
Flintrock Farm 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 3,000 30.00
Forest Hills 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 3,200
Four Mile Ck RFP* 1 CATAWBA 03050103 2,223
Freedom Park 1 CATAWBA 03050103 4,200
Friedburg Marsh 1 YADKIN 03040101 0.00
Gatlin Swamp 1 ROANOKE 03010107 125.00
Gibson Pond 1 YADKIN 03040201 0 36.70
Gillespie Golf Course 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 3,427 1,200
Glen Raven 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 3,290 700
Goldsboro Housing Auth* 1 NEUSE 03020201 2,100
Goose Creek 1 NEUSE 03020201 1,800
Goshen Swamp 1 CAPE FEAR 03030007 0.00
Gray Farm 1 CATAWBA 03050101 7,610
3 of 55 Updated 09/ 30/ 2005
Appendix A: EEP Gross Asset List of Tier 1 Restoration, Enhancement, Creation, and Preservation Sites Alphabetically * ( High Quality
Preservation Sites are not listed in table below)
Project Name
Tier
River Basin
8- digit CU
Stream Restoration
Stream Enhancment I
Stream Enhancement II
Stream Preservation
Riverine Restoration
Riverine Creation
Riverine Enhancement
Riverine Preservation
Nonriverine Restoration
Nonriverine Creation
Nonriverine Enhancement
Nonriverine Preservation
Coastal Marsh Restoration
Coastal Marsh Creation
Coastal Marsh Enhancement
Coastal Marsh Preservation
Stream Buffer
Great Dismal Swamp 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 553
Greenville Country Club 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020103 814 3,979 0.9
Gregory 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020102 6,500 75.00
Grimesland Site 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020103 49.01 348.00 80.00 29.59
Grove Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030007 6.00 10.20 352.00 3.90 7.60
Gurley 1 NEUSE 03020203 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Haithcock Site ( Ellerbee) 1 YADKIN 03040104 0
Hall Branch 1 YADKIN 03040201 2,000 2.70 0.60
Hammock's State Park 1 WHITE OAK 03020106
Hanging Rock Creek ( A3) 1 WATAUGA 06010103 2,800 1,000
Hargett/ Tucker Farm 1 NEUSE 03020204 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.50
Harrell Site 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020101 8,238 15.00
Haw Branch ( 16- D04015) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030007 10,060 25.00
Haw River Swamp II ( 16- D04011) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 14.70 2.50 18.00
Haw River Tract 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 80.00
Haw's Run 1 CAPE FEAR 03030007 0 0 0 0 11.80 0.00 25.00 171.00 49.40 0.00 0.00 11.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Heath Dairy Road 1 YADKIN 03040103 8,700 2,900 700 2.00
Helms 1 YADKIN 03040105 342
Hendersonville Wetlands 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 20.00
High Vista 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 3,100 400
Hillcrest Bay ( 16- D04011) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 27.00
Hillsdale Park 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 5,963
Hoffman Forest Bank ( MOA) 1 WHITE OAK 03030001 38.00
Hoffman Forest Bank ( MOU) 1 WHITE OAK 03030001 12.00
Homestead ( wetland) 1 YADKIN 03040102 28.20 2.10 1.00 0.10
Hominy Swamp Creek 1 NEUSE 03020203 2,232
Horsepen Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 1.77
Howard Farm 1 NEUSE 03020203 26.30
Howell Woods 1 NEUSE 03020201 20.00 80.00 39.00
Huskanaw Swamp 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020103 23.60
Indian Creek 1 CATAWBA 03050102 0
Irwin Creek Whitehurst Road 1 CATAWBA 03050103 2,000 1.50
Jacksonville Country Club 1 WHITE OAK 03030001 3,400 400 400
Jalo 1 NEUSE 03020201 2,500
Johnson Site 1 YADKIN 03040102 4,600
4 of 55 Updated 09/ 30/ 2005
Appendix A: EEP Gross Asset List of Tier 1 Restoration, Enhancement, Creation, and Preservation Sites Alphabetically * ( High Quality
Preservation Sites are not listed in table below)
Project Name
Tier
River Basin
8- digit CU
Stream Restoration
Stream Enhancment I
Stream Enhancement II
Stream Preservation
Riverine Restoration
Riverine Creation
Riverine Enhancement
Riverine Preservation
Nonriverine Restoration
Nonriverine Creation
Nonriverine Enhancement
Nonriverine Preservation
Coastal Marsh Restoration
Coastal Marsh Creation
Coastal Marsh Enhancement
Coastal Marsh Preservation
Stream Buffer
Jones Creek ( 16- D04020) 1 YADKIN 03040201 3,100 5,150 25.50 0.50
Jumping Run Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 4,000 67.00
Jumping Run Creek 1 WHITE OAK 03020106 4.40
Juniper Bay 1 LUMBER 03040203 697.38
Kentwood Park 1 NEUSE 03020201 1,400
Key Branch 1 YADKIN 03040104 0 18.40 3.60 6.1
Kings Creek 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 2,300
Knobs Creek 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 19
La Grange 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 4.00 14.00
Lake Wheeler 1 NEUSE 03020201 0.00
Lengyel 1 NEUSE 03020204 5.64 4.70
Lick Creek ( 16- D04011) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 9,500 0.00
Little Beaver Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 5,298 4.75 0.97
Little Buffalo 1 NEUSE 03020201 27.00
Little Contentnea Creek ( Farmville
C. C.) 1 NEUSE 03020203 950 1,330
Little Contentnea- Buffer 1 NEUSE 03020203 54.16
Little Grassy Creek 1 ROANOKE 03010102 17,300
Little McQueen 1 LUMBER 03040203 0.00
Little River 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 7,315 40.00 11.00 56.00 42.00
Little Sugar Creek I 1 CATAWBA 03050103 0.00
Long Creek 1 CATAWBA 03050103 1.64
Long Swamp 1 LUMBER 03040203 0.00
Louisburg ( UT to Tar River) 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020101 1,940
Lowell Mill ( 16- D04008) 1 NEUSE 03020201 34,990
Mallard Creek 1 CATAWBA 03050103 0.00
Mallard Creek 1 YADKIN 03040105
Manning Farm 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020103 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00
Marys Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 2,500
Mashoe's Road 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29.32 0 0 0 130.94 0
McCain Property 1 YADKIN 03040103 2,300
McCotter- Raines 1 NEUSE 03020204 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.40
McDonald's Pond 1 YADKIN 03040201 3,492 656 6,550 18.50 4.10 34.50
McIntyre Creek @ Hornets Nest
Park 1 CATAWBA 03050103 4,800 1.50
McIntyre Property 1 CAPE FEAR 03030005 12.30 37.30 79.90
5 of 55 Updated 09/ 30/ 2005
Appendix A: EEP Gross Asset List of Tier 1 Restoration, Enhancement, Creation, and Preservation Sites Alphabetically * ( High Quality
Preservation Sites are not listed in table below)
Project Name
Tier
River Basin
8- digit CU
Stream Restoration
Stream Enhancment I
Stream Enhancement II
Stream Preservation
Riverine Restoration
Riverine Creation
Riverine Enhancement
Riverine Preservation
Nonriverine Restoration
Nonriverine Creation
Nonriverine Enhancement
Nonriverine Preservation
Coastal Marsh Restoration
Coastal Marsh Creation
Coastal Marsh Enhancement
Coastal Marsh Preservation
Stream Buffer
McLeansville 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 6.00
Meredell Farm Site 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 3,865 4,000 5,136
Methodist College 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 2,500 2,000
Middle Swamp Creek 1 LUMBER 03040203 7,070
Mildred Woods 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020103 129.00 8.00 23.00
Mill Branch 1 LUMBER 03040206 3,282 0 0 1,750 0.00 0.25 0.44 35.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mineral Springs 1 CAPE FEAR 03030007 1,190 2,000
Mocassin Creek 1 NEUSE 03020203 180 0.42 5.30 39.67 3.72
Moccasin Creek- Buffer 1 NEUSE 03020201 20.20
Modlin Site 1 ROANOKE 03010107 40.00
Morgan Creek Floodplain 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 19.00
Moye Farm Phase I 1 NEUSE 03020203 37.10
Moye Farm Phase II 1 NEUSE 03020202 50.00
Mud Creek 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 15.60
Naked Creek 1 YADKIN 03040101 7,000
Neu- Con Mitigation Bank 1 NEUSE 03020201 7,500 20.00 100.00
Neu- Con Mitigation Bank 1 NEUSE 03020202 50.00
Neu- Con Mitigation Bank 1 NEUSE 03020203 7,500 175.00 60.00
Neu- Con Mitigation Bank 1 NEUSE 03020204 7,500 60.00
New Light 1 NEUSE 03020201
Nichols Farm 1 CHOWAN 03010203 0 3,500 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
North River 1na WHITE OAK 03020106 250.00
Northgate Park ( Ellerbe) 1 NEUSE 03020201 1,800
Norwood Gainey Site 1 NEUSE 03020202 50.00
Open Springs 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 4,520
Paschal GC ( Richland Ck) 1 NEUSE 03020201 2,900
Patton Branch 1 LITTLE TENNESSEE 06010202 2,400
Payne Dairy 1 CATAWBA 03050101 5,177 470 1,350
Payne Dale 1 NEUSE 03020203 1,500 6.00
Pea Island 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 0
Pembroke Creek I 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 0
Pembroke Creek II 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 - 0.091
Philips 1 NEUSE 03020201 0.00
Pleasant Hill 1 NEUSE 03020204 25.00
Pott Creek 1 CATAWBA 03050102 3,500 5.45 31.32 0.76 0.36
Pott Creek II 1 CATAWBA 03050102 10,054
6 of 55 Updated 09/ 30/ 2005
Appendix A: EEP Gross Asset List of Tier 1 Restoration, Enhancement, Creation, and Preservation Sites Alphabetically * ( High Quality
Preservation Sites are not listed in table below)
Project Name
Tier
River Basin
8- digit CU
Stream Restoration
Stream Enhancment I
Stream Enhancement II
Stream Preservation
Riverine Restoration
Riverine Creation
Riverine Enhancement
Riverine Preservation
Nonriverine Restoration
Nonriverine Creation
Nonriverine Enhancement
Nonriverine Preservation
Coastal Marsh Restoration
Coastal Marsh Creation
Coastal Marsh Enhancement
Coastal Marsh Preservation
Stream Buffer
Prestonwood G. C. 1 NEUSE 03020201 4,100
Price Park 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 1,776
Pridgen Flats 1 CAPE FEAR 03030006 0.00
Privateer Farms 1 CAPE FEAR 03030005 34,005 402.50 25.00
Purlear Creek 1 YADKIN 03040101 13,000 2.00 2.00
Purlear Creek II 1 YADKIN 03040101 1,500 1.00 2.00
R- 2719 BA 1 NEUSE 03020201 0
Randleman Lake Buffer Project 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 90.00
Reed's Creek 1 CATAWBA 03050101 4.20 2.20
Reedy Branch 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 2,400
Rich Fork FDP ( Bodenheimer-
Parker) 1 YADKIN 03040103 3,000 20.00 2.00
Richland Creek 1 NEUSE 03020201 300
River Bend 1 ROANOKE 03010104 0 0 0 0 89 0.00 0.00 19.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Rocky Branch 1 YADKIN 03040102 3,200 1,200 2,350
Roquist 1 ROANOKE 03010107 500 52.00 3,386.00
Rosalyn Stream Restoration Project
( Stewart Creek) 1 CATAWBA 03050103 2,000
Rowan Branch 1 CAPE FEAR 03030006 600 0 0 0 13.50 0.00 13.50 0.00 26.00 0.00 26.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Rowel Branch 1 CAPE FEAR 03030005
Sand Shoals 1 WHITE OAK 03020106 0.00
Sandy Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 3,000 3.20
Sandy Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 5.69
Sandy Mush 1 FRENCH BROAD 06010105 8,000
Sawmill 1 NEUSE 03020202 0.28 0.18 0.24 0.81
Scuppernong River Mitigation Bank 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.77 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0
Seven Springs 1 NEUSE 03020202 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Shepherd's Tree 1 YADKIN 03040102 254 19.80 93.30 8.00
Silas Creek 1 YADKIN 03040101 4,500
Silver Creek ( 16- D04006) 1 CATAWBA 03050101 5,127 1,392 2,036 1,077
Silver Creek- Conway 1 CATAWBA 03050101 4,520
Simpson Buffer 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020104 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.00
Simpson Wetland 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020104 30
Smith Creek Site 1 CAPE FEAR 03030007 0.00
Smith/ Austin Creek 1 NEUSE 03020201 8,000 2,000
7 of 55 Updated 09/ 30/ 2005
Appendix A: EEP Gross Asset List of Tier 1 Restoration, Enhancement, Creation, and Preservation Sites Alphabetically * ( High Quality
Preservation Sites are not listed in table below)
Project Name
Tier
River Basin
8- digit CU
Stream Restoration
Stream Enhancment I
Stream Enhancement II
Stream Preservation
Riverine Restoration
Riverine Creation
Riverine Enhancement
Riverine Preservation
Nonriverine Restoration
Nonriverine Creation
Nonriverine Enhancement
Nonriverine Preservation
Coastal Marsh Restoration
Coastal Marsh Creation
Coastal Marsh Enhancement
Coastal Marsh Preservation
Stream Buffer
Snow Creek 1 ROANOKE 03010103 3,000
South Buffalo Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 4.03 2.21
South Fork 1 CATAWBA 03050102 11,260
South Fork Hopper ( 16- D04006) 1 CATAWBA 03050101 7,213 5.10 1.00
South Muddy Creek ( 16- D04006) 1 CATAWBA 03050101 12,646 2,653
Sparta Bog 1 NEW 05050001 11.90
Speas Property 1 TAR- PAMLICO 03020101 2,295 2.80 4.34
Speight Branch 1 NEUSE 03020201 0 1.00 1.22
Spring Branch 1 CAPE FEAR 03030007 0
Stallings 1 NEUSE 03020204 4,476 11.00 4.00 19.00 12.60 14.50
Starmount Forest CC 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 0
Starmount Park 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 0
Stillhouse Creek 1 NEUSE 03020201 1,500
Stone Mountain 1 YADKIN 03040101 7,000 2,590
Stonebridge 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 6,240
Sturgeon City ( Phase I) 1 WHITE OAK 03030001 3.50
Sturgeon City ( Phase II) 1 WHITE OAK 03030001 2.50
Suck Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 3,000
Sussman's Park 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 0
Tarlton Swamp 1 CAPE FEAR 03030004 3,400 540 200 7.00 5.50
Tate Farm 1 NEW 05050001 3,525 13,000 10,550 4 7.35 0.25
Troublesome ( Haw River) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 12.00 0.00
Trout Cove Branch 1 HIWASSEE 06020002 3,900
Tucker Farm 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 0
Tulula Bog 1 LITTLE TENNESSEE 06010204 4,683 47.84
Underhill 1 NEUSE 03020201 0.00
Upper UT to Cane Creek ( Picard) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 6,440
UT to Barnes Creek ( HurleySite) 1 YADKIN 03040103 2,000 800 623 1.00 0.39
UT to Lilliput Creek ( Hog Branch
Ponds) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030005 2,000 2,000 23.00 15.00 30.00 234.00
UT to Little Coharie Creek
( Roseboro Site) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030006 1,630 700
UT to Rocky River ( Smith Tract) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 1,185 1,100 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.50
8 of 55 Updated 09/ 30/ 2005
Appendix A: EEP Gross Asset List of Tier 1 Restoration, Enhancement, Creation, and Preservation Sites Alphabetically * ( High Quality
Preservation Sites are not listed in table below)
Project Name
Tier
River Basin
8- digit CU
Stream Restoration
Stream Enhancment I
Stream Enhancement II
Stream Preservation
Riverine Restoration
Riverine Creation
Riverine Enhancement
Riverine Preservation
Nonriverine Restoration
Nonriverine Creation
Nonriverine Enhancement
Nonriverine Preservation
Coastal Marsh Restoration
Coastal Marsh Creation
Coastal Marsh Enhancement
Coastal Marsh Preservation
Stream Buffer
UT to Sandy Creek ( Williams Tract) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030003 2,590
UT to South Fork Creek ( Hadley-
Newlin) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 6,000
UT to South Fork Creek ( Stephens) 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 4,500
Valley Fields Farm Site 1 YADKIN 03040103 9,500 0 9,000 3.00 4.00 4.00
Wake Forest C. C. 1 NEUSE 03020201 3,400
Walnut Creek ( Buffer) ( 16- D04009) 1 NEUSE 03020201 25.00
Warrior Creek 1 YADKIN 03040101 9,200
Watts Property 1 PASQUOTANK 03010205 1,000 4 40
Wells Creek 1 CAPE FEAR 03030002 6,000
Whitehall Reserve 1 CATAWBA 03050103 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Whitelace Ck* 1 NEUSE 03020202 1,700 22.00 12.40
Whitley Site 1 NEUSE 03020201 27.50
Wiggins Mill 1 NEUSE 03020203 247 12.69 6.65
Wike Property ( Lyle Creek) 1 CATAWBA 03050101 2,400 800
Zack's Fork Ck RFP* 1 CATAWBA 03050101 3,900
* All former NCDOT sites that have been transferred to EEP represent the Remaining Undebited Assets at the time of transfer. Thus NCDOT sites that had been completely debited at the time of transfer to EEP show zero
assets. All other NCWRP and EEP originated show gross amounts.
9 of 55 Updated 09/ 30/ 2005
Appendix B: Summary of EEP Gross Assets
River Basin 8- digit CU
Stream
Restoration
Stream
Enhancment I
Stream
Enhancement II
Stream
Preservation
Riverine
Restoration
Riverine Creation
Riverine
Enhancement
Riverine
Preservation
Nonriverine
Restoration
Nonriverine
Creation
Nonriverine
Enhancement
Nonriverine
Preservation
Coastal Marsh
Restoration
Coastal Marsh
Creation
Coastal Marsh
Enhancement
Coastal Marsh
Preservation
Stream Buffer
BROAD 5,167 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03050105 5,167 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
CAPE FEAR 247,287 21,608 2,750 17,651 701.46 32.00 128.47 840.48 928.06 0.00 301.68 409.00 37.30 0.00 79.90 0.00 92.5
03030002 63,612 11,268 750 3,000 81.07 10.80 3.47 140.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03030003 112,390 5,100 0 5,136 5.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 14.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 92.5
03030004 23,800 2,540 0 7,515 114.00 11.00 61.50 162.35 27.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03030005 34,005 2,000 0 2,000 443.60 0.00 25.00 15.00 817.76 0.00 251.90 0.00 37.30 0.00 79.90 0.00 0.0
03030006 2,230 700 0 0 13.50 0.00 13.50 0.00 26.00 0.00 28.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03030007 11,250 0 2,000 0 43.60 10.20 25.00 523.00 53.30 0.00 7.60 409.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
CATAWBA 123,354 8,043 13,951 3,486 32.19 32.82 14.26 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03050101 83,317 8,043 13,951 3,486 23.60 0.00 13.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03050102 24,814 0 0 0 5.45 31.32 0.76 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03050103 15,223 0 0 0 3.14 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
CHOWAN 0 3,500 0 0 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03010203 0 3,500 0 0 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
FRENCH BROAD 18,900 400 0 0 22.00 0.00 15.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
06010105 18,900 400 0 0 22.00 0.00 15.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
HIWASSEE 3,900 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
06020002 3,900 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
LITTLE TENNESSEE 16,083 0 0 0 50.84 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
06010202 11,400 0 0 0 3.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
06010204 4,683 0 0 0 47.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
LUMBER 20,352 0 0 1,750 0.00 0.25 0.44 35.80 697.38 0.00 0.00 301.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03040203 17,070 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 697.38 0.00 0.00 300.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03040204 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03040206 3,282 0 0 1,750 0.00 0.25 0.44 35.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03040207 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
NEUSE 111,686 9,815 3,800 0 484.79 5.00 173.25 405.27 1,674.70 5.00 991.80 73.85 5.64 0.00 0.18 4.94 604.4
03020201 87,116 6,985 2,100 0 66.08 1.00 81.22 39.00 116.90 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 154.2
03020202 0 0 1,700 0 110.00 0.00 34.28 300.00 50.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.24 185.2
03020203 11,109 2,830 0 0 188.11 0.00 11.95 39.67 60.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 177.3
03020204 13,461 0 0 0 120.60 4.00 45.80 26.60 1,447.80 0.00 991.80 73.85 5.64 0.00 0.00 4.70 87.8
10 of 55 Updated 09/ 30/ 2005
Appendix B: Summary of EEP Gross Assets
River Basin 8- digit CU
Stream
Restoration
Stream
Enhancment I
Stream
Enhancement II
Stream
Preservation
Riverine
Restoration
Riverine Creation
Riverine
Enhancement
Riverine
Preservation
Nonriverine
Restoration
Nonriverine
Creation
Nonriverine
Enhancement
Nonriverine
Preservation
Coastal Marsh
Restoration
Coastal Marsh
Creation
Coastal Marsh
Enhancement
Coastal Marsh
Preservation
Stream Buffer
NEW 4,875 13,490 1,750 10,550 4.00 0.00 7.35 0.00 11.90 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
05050001 4,875 13,490 1,750 10,550 4.00 0.00 7.35 0.00 11.90 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
PASQUOTANK 1,000 0 0 0 396.64 0.00 21.70 68.65 1,131.55 0.00 0.00 139.32 0.00 40.25 0.00 180.94 0.0
03010205 1,000 0 0 0 396.64 0.00 21.70 68.65 1,131.55 0.00 0.00 139.32 0.00 40.25 0.00 180.94 0.0
ROANOKE 7,800 0 0 18,800 129.00 0.00 0.00 576.43 255.00 0.00 0.00 3,431.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03010102 0 0 0 17,300 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03010103 3,000 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03010104 0 0 0 0 89.00 0.00 0.00 19.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03010107 4,800 0 0 1,500 40.00 0.00 0.00 557.43 255.00 0.00 0.00 3,431.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
TAR- PAMLICO 19,022 11,203 5,983 0 266.01 2.80 27.10 428.50 321.50 80.00 0.00 540.00 3.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 98.9
03020101 11,708 4,235 0 0 12.00 2.80 3.50 10.90 45.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.3
03020102 6,500 0 0 0 75.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03020103 814 6,968 1,876 0 178.01 0.00 23.60 356.00 23.90 80.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 49.6
03020104 0 0 4,107 0 1.00 0.00 0.00 61.60 252.60 0.00 0.00 540.00 3.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.0
WATAUGA 2,800 1,000 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
06010103 2,800 1,000 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
WHITE OAK 8,532 400 400 0 36.40 1.00 0.00 0.00 396.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03020106 5,132 0 0 0 36.40 1.00 0.00 0.00 346.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03030001 3,400 400 400 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
YADKIN 154,762 9,167 10,851 29,265 221.34 111.48 28.45 93.00 14.00 0.00 8.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.1
03040101 66,000 0 2,590 2,376 58.90 16.08 3.35 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03040102 25,649 1,200 0 2,350 73.00 95.40 13.00 0.10 10.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03040103 26,875 4,900 623 9,700 24.00 0.00 3.39 2.00 4.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03040104 2,099 1,369 0 5,715 18.40 0.00 0.00 11.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.1
03040105 14,880 1,042 1,088 3,974 0.34 0.00 3.51 6.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
03040201 19,259 656 6,550 5,150 46.70 0.00 5.20 71.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
Grand Total 745,520 78,626 39,485 81,502 2,345.67 185.35 416.62 2,450.49 5,430.09 85.00 1,301.48 4,894.92 52.42 40.25 80.08 185.88 802.0
11 of 55 Updated 09/ 30/ 2005
Appendix C: Net Remaining Asset Credits ( September 30 2005)
Stream
Restoration
Stream
Restoration
Equivalent
Riverine
Restoration
Riverine
Restoration
Equivalent
Nonriverine
Restoration
Nonriverine
Restoration
Equivalent
Coastal
Marsh
Restoration
Coastal
Marsh
Restoration
Equivalent
Broad 3,545 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
03050105 Total 3,545 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 2,482 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 1,063 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Cape Fear 135,858 1,427 599.69 173.73 915.72 173.04 37.30 26.63
03030001 0
03030002 Total 4,137 0 54.73 6.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 3,378 0 3.83 4.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 760 0 50.90 1.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
03030003 Total 80,690 1,027 5.48 0.00 3.89 4.67 0.00 0.00
MOU 8,687 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 72,003 1,027 5.48 0.00 3.89 4.67 0.00 0.00
03030004 Total 12,002 0 53.98 40.67 26.91 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 4,018 0 52.90 16.64 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 7,984 0 1.08 24.03 26.74 0.00 0.00 0.00
03030005 Total 34,826 400 440.24 8.98 648.57 76.30 37.30 26.63
MOU 1,084 400 20.65 0.65 22.02 70.33 0.00 0.00
MOA 33,742 0 419.59 8.33 626.55 5.97 37.30 26.63
03030006 Total 2,437 0 12.43 4.50 186.51 9.39 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 2,437 0 12.43 4.50 186.51 9.39 0.00 0.00
03030007 Total 1,766 0 32.83 112.92 49.84 82.68 0.00 0.00
MOU 1,766 0 10.08 0.00 0.00 1.80 0.00 0.00
MOA 0 0 22.75 112.92 49.84 80.87 0.00 0.00
Catawba 27,292 482 18.77 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
03050101 Total 4,836 482 1.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 4,836 482 1.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
03050102 Total 22,456 0 17.73 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 22,456 0 17.73 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
03050103 Total 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Chowan 2,333 0 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
03010203 Total 2,333 0 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 2,333 0 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
03010201 Total 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
03010202 Total 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
03010204 Total 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
French Broad 7,776 0 18.39 5.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
06010105 Total 7,776 0 18.39 5.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 494 0 17.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 7,282 0 0.52 5.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
06010106 Total 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
06010108 Total 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hiwassee 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
06020002 Total 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
06020003 Total 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
River Basin
Cataloging Unit
Net Remaining Asset Credits September 30,2005
12 of 55 Updated 09/ 30/ 2005
Appendix C: Net Remaining Asset Credits ( September 30 2005)
Stream
Restoration
Stream
Restoration
Equivalent
Riverine
Restoration
Riverine
Restoration
Equivalent
Nonriverine
Restoration
Nonriverine
Restoration
Equivalent
Coastal
Marsh
Restoration
Coastal
Marsh
Restoration
Equivalent
River Basin
Cataloging Unit
Net Remaining Asset Credits September 30,2005
Little Tennessee 16,083 0 50.84 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
06010202 Total 11,400 0 3.00 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 11,400 0 3.00 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
06010203 Total 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
06010204 Total 4,683 0 47.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 4,683 0 47.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Lumber 11,034 350 0.11 7.31 638.01 60.28 0.00 0.00
03040203 Total 7,752 0 0.00 0.00 638.01 60.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 4,270 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 3,482 0 0.00 0.00 638.01 60.00 0.00 0.00
03040204 Total 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
03040206 Total 3,282 350 0.11 7.31 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 3,282 350 0.11 7.31 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00
03040207 Total 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Neuse 42,058 0 436.63 114.36 1,650.95 340.99 5.64 1.05
03020201 Total 15,975 0 34.85 10.55 98.09 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 2,223 0 2.84 10.51 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 13,752 0 32.01 0.04 97.85 0.00 0.00 0.00
03020202 Total 0 0 91.83 71.21 50.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 5.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 0 0 86.52 71.21 50.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
03020203 Total 12,996 0 187.35 11.92 59.44 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 2,232 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 10,764 0 187.35 11.92 59.44 0.00 0.00 0.00
03020204 Total 13,087 0 122.60 20.68 1,443.42 340.99 5.64 1.05
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 13,087 0 122.60 20.68 1,443.42 340.99 5.64 1.05
New 12,667 2,110 2.32 2.45 11.90 0.05 0.00 0.00
05050001 Total 12,667 2,110 2.32 2.45 11.90 0.05 0.00 0.00
MOU 11,753 2,110 1.91 2.45 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00
MOA 914 0 0.41 0.00 11.90 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pasquotank 361 0 395.08 19.44 1,122.64 27.76 19.91 35.97
03010205 Total 361 0 395.08 19.44 1,122.64 27.76 19.91 35.97
MOU 0 0 3.98 2.58 32.72 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 361 0 391.10 16.86 1,089.92 27.76 19.91 35.97
Roanoke 4,030 3,760 123.66 110.50 252.80 684.80 0.00 0.00
03010102 Total 0 3,460 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 0 3,460 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
03010103 Total 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
03010104 Total 0 0 88.29 3.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 0 0 88.29 3.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
03010106 Total 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
03010107 Total 4,030 300 35.37 106.95 252.80 684.80 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 4,030 300 35.37 106.95 252.80 684.80 0.00 0.00
Savannah 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
03060101 Total 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
03060102 Total 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
13 of 55 Updated 09/ 30/ 2005
Appendix C: Net Remaining Asset Credits ( September 30 2005)
Stream
Restoration
Stream
Restoration
Equivalent
Riverine
Restoration
Riverine
Restoration
Equivalent
Nonriverine
Restoration
Nonriverine
Restoration
Equivalent
Coastal
Marsh
Restoration
Coastal
Marsh
Restoration
Equivalent
River Basin
Cataloging Unit
Net Remaining Asset Credits September 30,2005
Tar- Pamlico 26,014 0 261.98 94.05 326.78 108.00 3.30 0.00
03020101 Total 13,345 0 12.72 2.67 17.32 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 3,577 0 0.00 0.00 2.32 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 9,768 0 12.72 2.67 15.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
03020102 Total 6,500 0 70.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 6,500 0 70.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
03020103 Total 4,526 0 177.99 79.07 56.86 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 4,526 0 177.99 79.07 56.86 0.00 0.00 0.00
03020104 Total 1,643 0 1.00 12.32 252.60 108.00 3.30 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 1,643 0 1.00 12.32 252.60 108.00 3.30 0.00
03020105 Total 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Watauga 3,300 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
06010103 Total 3,300 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 3,300 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
White Oak 4,608 0.00 32.33 0.00 104.91 0.00 3.72 0.00
03030001 Total 0 0 0.00 0.00 27.94 0.00 3.54 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.54 0.00
MOA 0 0 0.00 0.00 27.94 0.00 0.00 0.00
03020106 Total 4,608 0 32.33 0.00 76.97 0.00 0.18 0.00
MOU 0 0 1.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 4,608 0 30.60 0.00 76.97 0.00 0.18 0.00
Yadkin 89,906 5,853.00 229.00 22.89 10.29 1.33 0.00 0.00
03040101 Total 17,932 475 26.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 9,091 0 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 8,841 475 25.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
03040102 Total 17,303 470 119.74 3.66 10.00 1.33 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 17,303 470 119.74 3.66 10.00 1.33 0.00 0.00
03040103 Total 23,171 1,940 23.17 1.08 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 23,171 1,940 23.17 1.08 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.00
03040104 Total 3,012 1,143 18.40 2.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 3,012 1,143 17.82 2.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
03040105 Total 6,913 795 0.00 2.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 1,847 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 5,067 795 0.00 2.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
03040201 Total 21,574 1,030 41.69 13.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 1,258 0 0.48 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 20,316 1,030 41.21 12.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
03040202 Total 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOU 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOA 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Grand Total Total 386,864 13,982.00 2,169.79 550.65 5,034.01 1,396.24 69.86 63.65
Grand Total MOU 58,160 2,510.00 122.46 38.06 57.48 72.19 3.54 0.00
Grand Total MOA 328,704 11,472.00 2,047.33 512.59 4,976.53 1,324.06 66.33 63.65
14 of 55 Updated 09/ 30/ 2005
Appendix D1: EEP Gross High Quality Preservation Project List and Summary
Site Name County Eco-
Region River Basin CU TOTAL
Stream
TOTAL
Riverine
TOTAL
Non-
Riverine
Allen Site Franklin CP Tar- Pamlico 03020101 15,900.0 26.00 0.00
Camp Chestnut Ridge Orange CP Neuse 03020201 5,426.0 0.00 0.00
Country Line Cr ( Mackovich) Caswell CP Roanoke 03010104 2,304.0 0.00 0.00
Crowther North Rowan CP Yadkin 03040102 2,150.0 31.00 0.00
Davis ( Yadkin River) Davie CP Yadkin 03040101 4,750.0 0.00 0.00
Dutch Second Creek ( Hill) Rowan CP Yadkin 03040103 2,685.0 0.00 0.00
Eno River/ Poplar Ridge Orange CP Neuse 03020201 3,665.0 0.00 0.00
Eno River/ Wilderness Orange CP Neuse 03020201 21,671.0 0.00 0.00
Fishing Creek ( Capps) Warren CP Tar- Pamlico 03020102 3,300.0 0.00 0.00
Fishing Creek ( Green) Warren CP Tar- Pamlico 03020102 1,117.0 0.00 0.00
Fishing Creek ( Sturgis) Franklin CP Tar- Pamlico 03020102 1,077.0 0.00 0.00
Flat River ( Treyburn) Durham CP Neuse 03020201 25,013.0 0.00 0.00
Guthrie- Granville Tar River Granville CP Tar- Pamlico 03020101 7,850.0 0.00 0.00
Harper Sandy/ Swift Franklin CP Tar- Pamlico 03020101 2,300.0 0.00 0.00
Harris Granville CP Tar- Pamlico 03020101 51,736.0 187.00 0.00
Haw River/ Duke Forest Chatham CP Cape Fear 03030002 32,000.0 0.00 0.00
Haw River/ Phillips Guilford CP Cape Fear 03030002 3,628.0 0.00 0.00
Hyco Lake Bessemer Caswell CP Roanoke 03010104 12,333.0 0.00 0.00
Langley Cypress Creek Franklin CP Tar- Pamlico 03020101 1,458.5 19.72 0.00
Len's Knob/ Little Mountain Surry CP Yadkin 03040101 42,000.0 0.00 0.00
Little Fishing Warren CP Tar- Pamlico 03020102 14,500.0 0.00 0.00
Little River ( Baker) Randolph CP Yadkin 03040104 1,079.0 0.00 0.00
Little River ( Lewis) Randolph CP Yadkin 03040104 4,118.0 0.00 0.00
Little River ( Parker) Randolph CP Yadkin 03040104 2,683.0 0.00 0.00
Little River ( Walbourn) Randolph CP Yadkin 03040104 2,814.0 0.00 0.00
Little Shocco ( O'Neal) Franklin/ Warren CP Tar- Pamlico 03020102 1,770.0 0.00 2.30
Little Shocco ( Senter) Franklin CP Tar- Pamlico 03020101 2,985.0 0.00 0.00
Little Shocco Speed 1 Warren CP Tar- Pamlico 03020102 3,800.0 4.00 0.00
Little Shocco ( Tomlinson) Franklin CP Tar- Pamlico 03020102 4,100.0 15.00 0.00
McNair- Granville Tar River Granville CP Tar- Pamlico 03020101 14,225.0 21.00 0.00
Mayo River ( Gorrel) Rockingham CP Roanoke 03010103 2,015.0 0.00 0.00
Mayo River ( Grogan) Rockingham CP Roanoke 03010103 2,019.0 0.00 0.00
Beginning Balances
Page 15 of 55 Updated 09/ 30/ 2005
Appendix D1: EEP Gross High Quality Preservation Project List and Summary
Site Name County Eco-
Region River Basin CU TOTAL
Stream
TOTAL
Riverine
TOTAL
Non-
Riverine
Beginning Balances
Mayo River ( Walker) Rockingham CP Roanoke 03010103 1,920.0 0.00 0.00
O'Neal Sandy/ Swift Franklin CP Tar- Pamlico 03020101 775.0 4.00 0.00
Pickler's Bluff Rowan CP Yadkin 03040102 415.0 0.00 0.00
Sandy Creek ( A & P Timber) Franklin CP Tar- Pamlico 03020102 1,250.0 0.00 0.00
Sandy Creek ( Faulkner) Franklin CP Tar- Pamlico 03020102 1,000.0 0.00 7.00
Sandy Creek ( Parrish) Franklin CP Tar- Pamlico 03020102 3,198.0 0.00 0.00
Shelton Creek ( Peterson) Granville CP Tar- Pamlico 03020102 2,555.0 0.00 0.00
Shocco ( Alston Tracts 1- 3) Franklin CP Tar- Pamlico 03020102 20,680.0 43.00 0.00
Shocco ( Capps) Franklin CP Tar- Pamlico 03020102 1,506.0 0.00 0.00
Shocco Creek ( Davis) Warren CP Tar- Pamlico 03020102 805.0 1.50 0.00
Stevens Pennys Bend Durham CP Neuse 03020201 688.0 0.00 25.00
Swift Creek Wake CP Neuse 03020201 0.0 2.70 0.00
Tar River ( Averett) Granville CP Tar- Pamlico 03020102 792.0 0.00 0.00
Tar River ( B. Harris) Franklin CP Tar- Pamlico 03020102 2,685.0 0.90 0.00
Tar River ( Betty Crews) Granville CP Tar- Pamlico 03020102 1,935.0 0.00 0.00
Tar River ( Roy Crews) Granville CP Tar- Pamlico 03020102 915.0 0.00 0.00
Tar River ( Hodges) Franklin CP Tar- Pamlico 03020102 2,075.0 18.00 0.00
Tar River ( Smitherman) Granville CP Tar- Pamlico 03020102 2,150.0 5.00 0.00
Tar River ( Winslow) Granville CP Tar- Pamlico 03020102 2,800.0 0.00 0.00
Tucker ( Daniels 2) Granville CP Tar- Pamlico 03020101 907.0 0.00 0.00
White Pines/ Newton Tract Chatham CP Cape Fear 03030003 1,000.0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL CENTRAL PIEDMONT 348,522.5 189.12 34.30
Edwards Nash NICP Tar- Pamlico 03020102 4,756.0 7.50 0.00
Fishing Creek ( Hall) Edgecombe NICP Tar- Pamlico 03020102 9,713.0 115.00 0.00
Roanoke River Halifax NICP Roanoke 03010107 36,432.0 523.00 0.00
TOTAL NORTHERN INNER COASTAL PLAIN 50,901.0 645.50 0.00
Bruchon Mitchell NM French Broad 06010108 5,550.0 0.00 0.00
Elks Shoals Ashe NM New 05050001 3,370.0 0.00 0.00
Linville White Creek Burke NM Catawba 03050101 45,863.0 0.00 0.00
Little Tablerock Mitchell NM French Broad 06010108 24,491.0 0.00 0.00
Page 16 of 55 Updated 09/ 30/ 2005
Appendix D1: EEP Gross High Quality Preservation Project List and Summary
Site Name County Eco-
Region River Basin CU TOTAL
Stream
TOTAL
Riverine
TOTAL
Non-
Riverine
Beginning Balances
Lone Mountain ( NM) McDowell NM Catawba 03050101 450.0 0.00 0.00
Mingo Tract Caldwell NM Yadkin 03040101 29,024.0 0.00 0.00
New River Heights Ashe NM New 05050001 6,782.0 0.00 0.00
Sandy Mush Buncombe/ Madison NM French Broad 06010105 15,000.0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL NORTHERN MOUNTAINS 130,530.0 0.00 0.00
Roanoke River ( Cashie) Bertie NOCP Roanoke 03010107 11,819.0 305.00 0.00
Roquist Pocosin Bertie NOCP Roanoke 03010107 0.0 0.00 250.00
TOTAL NORTHERN OUTER COASTAL PLAIN 11,819.0 305.00 250.00
Great Cohaire Sampson SICP Cape Fear 03030006 154,660.0 4,000.00 0.00
TOTAL SOUTHERN INNER COASTAL PLAIN 154,660.0 4,000.00 0.00
Dupont Forest Transylvania SM French Broad 06010105 50,000.0 0.00 0.00
Lost Bridge Macon SM Little Tennessee 06010202 10,650.0 0.00 0.00
Needmore Swain SM Little Tennessee 06010202 96,446.0 30.00 0.00
Sandy Mush Buncombe/ Madison SM French Broad 06010105 90,000.0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL SOUTHERN MOUNTAINS 247,096.0 30.00 0.00
NE Cape Fear Wells Tract Pender SOCP Cape Fear 03030007 2,675.0 90.00 0.00
Wallace Deer Club Tracts 1- 2 Pender SOCP Cape Fear 03030007 2,340.0 26.00 1,034.00
Wallace Deer Club Tracts 3- 5 Pender SOCP Cape Fear 03030007 4,760.0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL SOUTHERN OUTER COASTAL PLAIN 9,775.0 116.00 1,034.00
Barnes Creek ( Wysner Mtn) Montgomery SP Yadkin 03040103 4,000.0 0.00 0.00
Broad River Greenway Cleveland SP Broad 03050105 20,359.0 0.00 0.00
Canal Branch ( Bishop) Anson SP Yadkin 03040105 5,728.0 0.00 0.00
Deep River/ Sandy McKean Moore SP Lumber 03040203 6,500.0 0.00 0.00
Drowning Creek/ Camp McCall Moore SP Lumber 03040203 15,679.0 575.00 0.00
Drowning Creek II/ Rankin Richmond/ Moore SP Lumber 03040203 33,000.0 879.00 0.00
Dutch Buffalo Creek ( Walker) Cabarrus SP Yadkin 03040105 2,428.0 0.00 0
Dutch Buffalo Creek ( Wickliff) Cabarrus SP Yadkin 03040105 180.0 0.00 0
Page 17 of 55 Updated 09/ 30/ 2005
Appendix D1: EEP Gross High Quality Preservation Project List and Summary
Site Name County Eco-
Region River Basin CU TOTAL
Stream
TOTAL
Riverine
TOTAL
Non-
Riverine
Beginning Balances
Glendon Slate Crk ( Paschal) Moore SP Cape Fear 03030003 1,329.0 0.00 0.00
Hitchcock Creek ( McDonald) Richmond SP Yadkin 03040201 2,600.0 0.00 0.00
Little River ( Cochran) Montgomery SP Yadkin 03040104 3,004.0 0.00 0
Lone Mountain Rutherford SP Broad 03050105 8,000.0 0.00 0.00
Old Cove Polk SP Broad 03050105 1,642.0 0.00 0.00
Paschal Deep River Moore SP Cape Fear 03030003 6,700.0 0.00 0.00
Rankin Gaston Gaston SP Catawba 03050101 18,300.0 20.00 0.00
Skyuka Creek ( Luthi) Polk SP Broad 03050105 1,993.0 0.00 0.00
Uwharrie River Bluff Montgomery SP Yadkin 03040103 1,467.0 0.00 0.00
Wimberley Moore SP Lumber 03040204 3,051.0 3.30 0.00
TOTAL SOUTHERN PIEDMONT 135,960.0 1,477.30 0.00
TOTAL ALL ECO- REGIONS 1,089,263.5 6,762.92 1,318.30
Page 18 of 55 Updated 09/ 30/ 2005
Appendix D2: EEP Gross High Quality Preservation Summary
Eco- Region Stream ( feet) Riverine Wetland ( acres) Non- Riverine Wetland
( acres)
Central Piedmont 348,522.50 189.12 34.30
Northern Inner Coastal Plain 50,901.00 645.50 0.00
Northern Mountains 130,530.00 0.00 0.00
Northern Outer Coastal Plain 11,819.00 305.00 250.00
Southern Inner Coastal Plain 154,660.00 4,000.00 0.00
Southern Mountains 247,096.00 30.00 0.00
Southern Outer Coastal Plain 9,775.00 116.00 1,034.00
Southern Piedmont 135,960.00 1,477.30 0.00
TOTAL High Quality Preservation Assets 1,089,263.50 6,762.92 1,318.30
Includes Harris streams, but not wetlands. Acreage of preservation quality wetlands on the Harris site is not yet known.
Total Beginning Balances
Page 19 of 55 Updated 9/ 30/ 2005
Appendix E1: Summary of Net EEP High Quality Preservation Assets ( Net Remaining HQP Assets)
Eco- Region Stream ( feet) Riverine Wetland ( acres) Non- Riverine Wetland
( acres)
Central Piedmont 215,043.00 151.27 12.00
Northern Inner Coastal Plain 30,307.00 559.38 0.00
Northern Mountains 104,803.50 0.00 0.00
Northern Outer Coastal Plain 11,819.00 299.92 250.00
Southern Inner Coastal Plain 65,781.50 3,611.885 0.00
Southern Mountains 180,426.00 17.485 0.00
Southern Outer Coastal Plain - 3,376.00 82.60 876.10
Southern Piedmont 82,462.50 1,418.20 0.00
TOTAL High Quality Preservation Assets 687,266.50 6,140.740 1,138.10
Includes Harris streams, but not wetlands. Acreage of preservation quality wetlands on the Harris site is not yet known.
Remaining High Quality Preservation Assets
Page 20 of 55 Updated 9/ 30/ 2005
Appendix E2: Summary of EEP High Quality Preservation Assets Utilized
Eco- Region Stream ( feet) Riverine Wetland ( acres) Non- Riverine Wetland
( acres)
Central Piedmont 133,479.50 37.85 22.30
Northern Inner Coastal Plain 20,594.00 86.12 0.00
Northern Mountains 25,726.50 0.00 0.00
Northern Outer Coastal Plain 0.00 5.08 0.00
Southern Inner Coastal Plain 88,878.50 388.115 0.00
Southern Mountains 66,670.00 12.515 0.00
Southern Outer Coastal Plain 13,151.00 33.40 157.90
Southern Piedmont 53,497.50 59.10 0.00
TOTAL High Quality Preservation Assets 401,997.00 622.180 180.20
Total High Quality Preservation Assets Utilized
Page 21 of 55
Updated 9/ 30/ 2005
Appendix F1: Total List of EEP MOA Mitigation Acceptances ( List of Current Commitments and Future MOA Year 3 Requirements)
TIP Number
Permit Issued?
County River Basin CU
Eco- Region
Stream Impacts
Riverine Wetland Impacts
Non- Riverine Wetland
Impacts
Coastal Impacts
Buffer Impacts
Acceptance Letter to
USACE
Type
Stream Restoration
Riverine Restoration
Non- Riverine Restoration
Coastal Restoration
Stream Equivalent
Riverine Equivalent
Non- Riverine Equivalent
Coastal Marsh Equivalent
Mitigation Site Utilized
HQP Stream
HQP Riverine
HQP Non- Riverine
HQP Coastal Marsh
MA 04072 N Johnston Neuse 03020201 NICP 0 0.25 0 0 0.0 04/ 20/ 04 C 0 0.25 0 0 0 0.25 0 0 Due at End of MOA Year Permit Issued
R- 4434 N Edgecombe Tar- Pamlico 03020103 NICP 0 0 1.574 0 0.0 04/ 20/ 04 C 0 0 1.574 0 0 0 1.574 0 Due at End of MOA Year Permit Issued
R- 0617C N Lincoln Catawba 03050102 SP 1,144 0 0 0 0.0 09/ 15/ 04 C 1,144 0 0 0 1,144 0 0 0 Due at End of MOA Year Permit Issued
R- 0617C N Lincoln Catawba 03050102 SP 0 0.29 0 0 0.0 09/ 15/ 04 P 0 0.29 0 0 0 0.29 0 0
Drowning Creek II/ Rankin Site, Remaining
Mitigation Due at End of MOA Year Permit
Issued 2.9
SR 1112 ( Div. 1) N Bertie Roanoke 03010107 NOCP 0 0.19 0 0 0.0 09/ 15/ 04 C 0 0.19 0 0 0 0.19 0 0 Due at End of MOA Year Permit Issued
I- 3311D N Mecklenburg Catawba 03050101 SP 250 0 0 0 0.0 10/ 26/ 04 C 250 0 0 0 250 0 0 0 Due at End of MOA Year Permit Issued
SR 1311 ( Div. 12) N Alexander Catawba 03050101 CP 64 0 0 0 0.0 11/ 30/ 04 C 64 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 Due at End of MOA Year Permit Issued
R- 3415 N Yadkin Yadkin 03040101 CP 894 0 0 0 0.0 12/ 06/ 04 C 894 0 0 0 894 0 0 0 Due at End of MOA Year Permit Issued
R- 3415 N Yadkin Yadkin 03040101 CP 275 0 0 0 0.0 12/ 06/ 04 C 275 0 0 0 275 0 0 0 Due at End of MOA Year Permit Issued
U- 3344A N Wake Neuse 03020201 CP 109 0 0 0 0.0 01/ 04/ 05 C 109 0 0 0 109 0 0 0 Due at End of MOA Year Permit Issued
U- 3344A N Wake Neuse 03020201 CP 0 0.07 0 0 0.0 01/ 04/ 05 P 0 0.07 0 0 0 0.07 0 0
Langley Cypress Creek, Remaining
Mitigation Due at End of MOA Year Permit
Issued 0.7
B- 3453 N Halifax/ Edgecombe Tar- Pamlico 03020102 NICP 0 1.752 0 0 0.0 01/ 04/ 05 P 0 1.752 0 0 0 1.752 0 0
Roanoke River - Halifax County,
Remaining Mitigation Due at End of MOA
Year Permit Issued 17.52
R- 3415 Add'l N Yadkin Yadkin 03040101 CP 29 0 0 0 0.0 01/ 04/ 05 C 29 0 0 0 29 0 0 0 Due at End of MOA Year Permit Issued
I- 4401 N Buncombe French Broad 06010105 SM 300 0.12 0 0 0.0 02/ 07/ 05 C 300 0.12 0 0 300 0.12 0 0 Due at End of MOA Year Permit Issued
B- 3665 N Henderson French Broad 06010105 SM 170 0 0 0 0.0 02/ 07/ 05 P 170 0 0 0 170 0 0 0
Dupont Forest, Remaining Mitigation Due
at End of MOA Year Permit Issued 1,700
U- 2912 N Cumberland Cape Fear 03030004 SICP 0 0.06 0 0 0.0 02/ 14/ 05 P 0 0.06 0 0 0 0.06 0 0
Great Cohaire, Remaining Mitigation Due
at End of MOA Year Permit Issued 0.6
R- 0617C N Lincoln Catawba 03050102 SP 247 0 0 0 0.0 02/ 14/ 05 C 247 0 0 0 247 0 0 0 Due at End of MOA Year Permit Issued
B- 4007 N Alleghany New 05050001 NM 0 0.01 0 0 0.0 03/ 16/ 05 C 0 0.01 0 0 0 0.01 0 0 Due at End of MOA Year Permit Issued
R- 3415 Add'l- 2 N Yadkin Yadkin 03040101 CP 14 0 0 0 0.0 03/ 16/ 05 C 14 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 Due at End of MOA Year Permit Issued
R- 2906A N Wake/ Durham Cape Fear 03030002 CP 26 0 0 0 0.0 04/ 19/ 05 C 26 0 0 0 26 0 0 0 Due at End of MOA Year Permit Issued
B- 4009 N Anson Yadkin 03040104 SP 0 0.28 0 0 0.0 05/ 31/ 05 P 0 0.28 0 0 0 0.28 0 0
Drowning Creek II/ Rankin, Remaining
Mitigation Due at End of MOA Year Permit
Issued 2.8
B- 4040 N Burke Catawba 03050101 NM 123 0 0 0 0.0 05/ 31/ 05 P 123 0 0 0 123 0 0 0
Mingo Tract, Remaining Mitigation Due at
End of MOA Year Permit Issued 1,230
B- 4041 N Burke Catawba 03050101 NM 160 0 0 0 0.0 05/ 31/ 05 C 160 0 0 0 160 0 0 0 Due at End of MOA Year Permit Issued
R- 2417BB Y Lee Cape Fear 03030004 SP 190 0 0 0 0.0 06/ 23/ 05 P 190 0 0 0 190 0 0 0
Barnes Creek ( Wysner Mountain),
Restoration Due 7/ 22/ 2006 1,900
B- 4240 N Polk Broad 03050105 SP 143 0 0 0 0.0 07/ 19/ 05 C 143 0 0 0 143 0 0 0 Due at End of MOA Year Permit Issued
U- 0620 Add'l- 4 N Cumberland Cape Fear 03030004 SICP 0 0 0.35 0 0.0 07/ 19/ 05 C 0 0 0.35 0 0 0 0.35 0 Due at End of MOA Year Permit Issued
B- 3640 N Gates Chowan 03010203 NOCP 0 0.19 0 0 0.0 07/ 19/ 05 P 0 0.19 0 0 0 0.19 0 0
Roanoke River ( Cashie), Remaining
Mitigation Due at End of MOA Year Permit
Issued 1.9
B- 3662 N Henderson French Broad 06010105 SM 84 0 0 0 0.0 07/ 19/ 05 P 84 0 0 0 84 0 0 0
Needmore Tract, Remaining Mitigation
Due at End of MOA Year Permit Issued 840
B- 3663 N Henderson French Broad 06010105 SM 43 0 0 0 0.0 07/ 19/ 05 P 43 0 0 0 43 0 0 0
Needmore Tract, Remaining Mitigation
Due at End of MOA Year Permit Issued 430
B- 3665 Add'l N Henderson French Broad 06010105 SM 0 0.019 0 0 0.0 07/ 19/ 05 P 0 0.019 0 0 0 0.019 0 0
Needmore Tract, Remaining Mitigation
Due at End of MOA Year Permit Issued 0.19
R- 2616 N Union Yadkin 03040105 SP 2,969 0.084 0.065 0 0.0 07/ 19/ 05 C 2,969 0.084 0.065 0 2,969 0.084 0.065 0 Due at End of MOA Year Permit Issued
B- 4027 N Bertie Pasquotank 03010205 NOCP 0 0.573 0 0 0.0 08/ 12/ 05 C 0 0.573 0 0 0 0.573 0 0 Due at End of MOA Year Permit Issued
R- 2404A N Bertie Roanoke 03010107 NOCP 1,354 3.32 72.55 0 0.0 08/ 12/ 05 P 1,354 3.32 72.55 0 1,354 3.32 72.55 0
Roanoke River ( Cashie) - 5: 1, Restoration
Mitigation Due at End of MOA Year Permit
Issued 6,770
U- 2905 N Alamance Cape Fear 03030002 CP 56 0 0 0 0.0 08/ 12/ 05 R 56 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Due at End of MOA Year Permit Issued
B- 3266 Add'l N Wilkes Yadkin 03040101 NM 37 0 0 0 0.0 08/ 16/ 05 P 37 0 0 0 37 0 0 0
Mingo Tract - 5: 1, Restoration Mitigation
Due at End of MOA Year Permit Issued 185
B- 3848 N Guilford Cape Fear 03030002 CP 0 0.091 0 0 0.0 08/ 16/ 05 P 0 0.091 0 0 0 0.091 0 0
Allen Site - 5: 1, Restoration Mitigation Due
at End of MOA Year Permit Issued 0.455
R- 2206B/ C N Lincoln Catawba 03050101 SP 107 0 0 0 0.0 08/ 29/ 05 P 107 0 0 0 107 0 0 0
Little River ( Cochran), Restoration
Mitigation Due at End of MOA Year Permit
Issued 535