Annual statistical report : summary statistics for the Division of Prisons & the Division of Adult Probation and Parole

              North Carolina

Department of Correction

Annual Statistical Report

Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

Summary Statistics for:

The Division of Prisons

The Division of Community Corrections

The Division of Alcoholism and Chemical Dependency Programs

James B. Hunt, Jr.

Governor

Theodis Beck

Secretary of Correction

James French

Director of Division of Prisons

Robert Lee Guy

Director of Division of Community Corrections

Lattie Baker, Jr.

Director of Division of Alcoholism and Chemical Dependency Programs

Prepared by:

The Office of Research and Planning

Department of Correction

Raleigh, North Carolina

November 2000

Table of Contents

Overview of The North Carolina Department of Correction ....................................................... 1

Office Of Research And Planning ............................................................................................. 2

I. Prisons........................................................................................................................ ......... 3

A. Prison Admissions:

Prison Admission Trend ................................................................................................. 5

Type of Admission.......................................................................................................... 5

Admissions by Sentencing Grids .................................................................................... 6

Crime Type of 1999- 2000 Admissions............................................................................ 7

B. Prison Population:

Prison Population Trend................................................................................................. 9

Population by Sentencing Grids ..................................................................................... 9

Crime Type of Prison Population .................................................................................. 10

Inmate Activities ........................................................................................................... 11

Inmate Disciplinary Infractions...................................................................................... 13

Escapes and Captures ................................................................................................. 14

C. Prison Releases:

Prison Release Trend................................................................................................... 16

Type of Release ........................................................................................................... 16

Time Served by Inmates Released in Fiscal Year 1999- 2000 ...................................... 17

Demographic Information for Prison Inmates .................................................................... 19

II. Division Of Community Corrections.................................................................................... 20

A. Probation:

Probation Entry Trend ................................................................................................. 22

Crime Type of 1999- 2000 Probation Entries................................................................ 22

Probation Population by Sentencing Grids .................................................................. 23

Probation Exit Trend.................................................................................................... 24

Type of Probation Exits ............................................................................................... 24

B. Post- Release:

Post- Release Entry Trend ........................................................................................... 26

Post- Release Population by Structured Sentencing Grids ........................................... 26

Post- Release Exit Trend.............................................................................................. 27

Type of Post- Release Exits ......................................................................................... 27

C. Parole:

Parole Entry Trend ...................................................................................................... 29

Crime Type of Parole Population................................................................................. 29

Parole Exit Trend......................................................................................................... 30

Type of Parole Exits .................................................................................................... 30

Intermediate Sanctions for Supervised Offenders ............................................................. 31

Special Supervised Offender Programs ............................................................................ 32

D. Criminal Justice Partnership Program ( CJPP):

1999- 2000 Admissions to Criminal Justice Partnership Programs ............................... 35

CJPP Admissions by Sentencing Grids ....................................................................... 35

CJPP Population and Services.................................................................................... 36

1999- 2000 Exits from Criminal Justice Partnership Programs ..................................... 37

Demographic Information for Offenders Supervised by Community Corrections ............... 38

III. Division of Alcoholism and Chemical Dependency Programs........................................... 40

Identifying Inmates for Participation in DART .................................................................... 42

A. Drug Alcohol Recovery Treatment ( DART):

1999- 2000 Enrollment in DART Intensive Residential Treatment ............................... 43

Crime Type of Entries to DART Intensive Residential Treatment................................. 44

1999- 2000 Exits from DART Intensive Residential Treatment ..................................... 44

B. Drug Alcohol Recovery Treatment 24:

1999- 2000 Enrollment in DART- 24.............................................................................. 45

Crime Type of Entries to DART- 24 .............................................................................. 45

1999- 2000 Exits from DART- 24................................................................................... 46

C. State Alliance for Recovery and General Education ( SARGE):

1999- 2000 Enrollment in SARGE ................................................................................ 47

Crime Type of Entries to SARGE................................................................................. 47

1999- 2000 Exits from SARGE ..................................................................................... 48

D. Continuing Care, Alcoholics Anonymous and Narcotics Anonymous:

1999- 2000 Enrollment in Continuing Care ................................................................... 49

E. Private Alcohol/ Drug Treatment Centers:

1999- 2000 Enrollment in Private Treatment Centers ................................................... 50

Crime Type of Entries to Private Treatment Centers.................................................... 50

1999- 2000 Exits from Private Treatment Centers ........................................................ 51

F. DWI DART - Cherry:

DWI DART- Cherry Descriptive Statistics for the 1999- 2000 Fiscal Year...................... 52

Demographic Information for the DACDP Programs ......................................................... 53

IV. Tables:

Populations by County of Conviction ............................................................................ 55

Listing of Division of Prisons Facilities .......................................................................... 58

Listing of Division of Community Corrections Regional Offices..................................... 62

550 copies of this public document were printed with the use of inmate labor

at an average cost of $ 2.72 per copy.

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 1 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

Overview of the North Carolina

Department of Correction

The North Carolina Department of Correction, one of the largest agencies in State government,

is responsible for the custody, supervision, and rehabilitation of adult offenders sentenced to

community/ intermediate punishments or prison. The Department is comprised of four divisions

that manage offenders directly, as well as numerous administrative support sections. The major

Divisions include the Division of Prisons, the Division of Community Corrections, and the

Division of Alcoholism and Chemical Dependency Programs.

The Department developed a long- range strategic plan, which is based on the following vision

statement and strategic issues:

Vision Statement

We, the employees of the Department of Correction, envision a organization respected

by the citizens of North Carolina for its effectiveness in responding to the problem of crime in

our society and working collaboratively with others to prevent crime through community

involvement. We see an organization providing public safety, opportunities for offenders to

become productive citizens, and growth and development of employees. We see ourselves

contributing to the creation of a society of law- abiding, responsible citizens.

Strategic Issues

· Lead proactively regarding corrections issues.

· Develop and train employees for personal and professional growth.

· Deliver effective services and programs using research and advanced

technology.

· Emphasize cost efficient management of resources and accountability for

high quality results.

There are over 18,500 employees in the Department of Correction, primarily working directly

with offenders in the community or in prisons. The Department is funded through legislative

appropriations and receipts ( e. g. Corrections Enterprises). The Department’s total authorized

budget and actual expenditures for the past five fiscal years are shown in the table below.

Fiscal Year Authorized Budget Actual Expenditures Percent Increase

in Authorized

Budget over

Previous Year

1999- 2000 $ 918,607,453 $ 899,627,278 - 0.31%

1998- 1999 $ 921,504,897 $ 918,906,191 4.20%

1997- 1998 $ 884,331,765 $ 868,239,255 - 1.00%

1996- 1997 $ 889,025,441 $ 868,608,350 8.20%

1995- 1996 $ 821,385,807 $ 765,930,147 10.05%

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 2 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

Office of Research and Planning

Supporting Successful Decisions

The Office of Research and Planning is part of the Secretary’s Office and provides support

services within the Department of Correction. It provides research, planning and decision-support

services to the Secretary of the Department and his/ her executive management team,

other Department of Correction managers and staff, members and staff of the General

Assembly, staff in the Governor’s Office, staff of other state criminal justice agencies, and

citizens.

The mission of the Office of Research and Planning is to assist the department and staff to

make informed decisions that will result in successful outcomes. Staff includes research and

evaluation analysts, applications programmers, correctional planners, and statisticians.

The Research section of the Office coordinates a variety of internal and external evaluation

projects. Research assists staff to evaluate effectiveness, modify policies and programs, and

report outcomes to policy makers. Research activities include the following:

· Obtain and organize topical information on research topics.

· Prepare statistical and topical reports.

· Conduct evaluations.

· Provide data and methodology review for evaluations.

· Approve research involving human subjects on offenders under the supervision of the

Department of Correction.

· Provide technical assistance on conducting evaluations.

The Planning section of the Office is leading the Department’s efforts to institutionalize strategic

planning in the operational divisions. Strategic planning is a structured process for deciding

work priorities and measures of success. Planning activities include the following:

· Develop a structure and process for planning.

· Conduct trend analyses and organizational assessments.

· Organize and facilitate meetings of work groups engaged in planning activities.

· Research, gather and organize information for policy and programming decisions.

· Consult on methods to implement and monitor plans and policies.

The Decision Support section of the Office provides aggregate statistical information and

software applications to assist Department managers and staff to make decisions. Decision

Support activities include the following:

· Provide answers to statistical questions about offenders.

· Write computer programs to extract aggregate offender data.

· Analyze and interpret statistical information.

· Develop software applications to provide information about offenders.

· Provide internet- based decision support training.

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 3 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

I. Division of Prisons

The Division of Prisons is responsible for the custody, supervision, and rehabilitation of

over 30,000 inmates. As of June 30, 2000, there are 76 state prisons in North Carolina and 7

contracted facilities operated by private non- profit or private, for- profit entities. In order to

protect the community, staff, and inmates, the Division of Prisons classifies prisons, inmates,

and prison beds according to prison security designation, inmate custody classification, and bed

security levels.

The Secretary of the Department of Correction assigns the security designation of the prison

based on the physical design and structure of the prison, the type of cells in the prison ( e. g.

single cells, dormitories), and the intensity and type of staff supervision ( e. g. armed, unarmed).

Currently, according to the Division of Prisons administration, there are 12 close, 22 medium,

and 42 minimum security state prisons.

The Division receives felons and misdemeanants sentenced to prison by the court for a period

of incarceration ranging from a minimum of 90 days for certain misdemeanors to life

imprisonment for crimes such as rape or murder. Prison staff classify the individual inmate's

custody by analyzing factors such as current crime, length of sentence, past criminal history,

and past prison behavior record. At the end of the 1999- 2000 fiscal year, there were 5,072

close ( 16%), 15,105 medium ( 48%), and 11,402 minimum ( 36%) custody inmates in prison.

The prison's mission and function determines bed security level. For example, medium security

prisons contain mostly medium security beds. However, they also contain some minimum

security beds for minimum custody work crews. Also, Central Prison, a close security prison,

may house a minimum custody inmate in a medium security hospital bed if the inmate needs to

be in the hospital.

The Division also provides rehabilitative activities for inmates. These activities include jobs,

educational programs, vocational programs, substance abuse intervention, mental health

intervention, and religious services.

Costs of Incarceration for Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

The Department calculates an average cost of incarcerating minimum, medium, and

close custody inmates annually. The figures include the direct costs of inmate

supervision/ custody and programs/ activities, and indirect administrative costs for Department

support of prisons. The average daily cost of incarcerating one inmate ranges from $ 52.52 in

minimum custody to $ 75.32 in close custody.

Inmate Custody Level Daily Cost per Inmate Annual Cost per Inmate

Minimum $ 52.52 $ 19,222

Medium $ 68.13 $ 24,936

Close $ 75.32 $ 27,567

Average $ 63.65 $ 23,296

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 4 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

The Department contracts for inmate housing in two private, for profit medium security prisons,

four private non- profit minimum security substance abuse treatment prisons, and one private

profit minimum security community re- entry prison. In October 2000, the Department of

Correction assumed operation of the two private prisons. The table indicates the contracted

operating cost per day per inmate for each of these prisons for the 1999- 2000 fiscal year.

Private Prisons Number of Inmates – 6/ 30/ 2000 Daily Cost Per Inmate

Mountain View Correctional Facility 528 $ 36.75

Pamlico Correctional Facility 524 $ 36.69

Right Turn of NC ( Charlotte) 99 $ 54.75

Mary Frances Center ( Tarboro) 96 $ 72.00

Cornell Alcohol/ TC 75 $ 50.99

Evergreen Rehab Center ( St. Paul) 75 $ 57.00

ECO Halfway House ( Charlotte) 20 $ 46.00

Contractual Total 1417

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 5 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

A. PRISON ADMISSIONS

Prison Admission Trend

During fiscal year 1999- 2000,

there were 24,161 admissions to

North Carolina prisons.

Fiscal Year Total

1999- 2000 24,161

1998- 1999 25,156

1997- 1998 25,408

1996- 1997 24,449

1995- 1996 23,181

1994- 1995 27,472

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

94- 95 95- 96 96- 97 97- 98 98- 99 99- 00

Prison admissions have remained relatively stable since 1997, primarily due to Structured

Sentencing policies and resources. The trend for prison admissions demonstrates a

decrease of approximately 1,000 inmates from fiscal year 1998 to fiscal year 1999. This is

due in part to a reorganization of programs within the Department of Correction. In past

years, the IMPACT boot camp program was part of the Division of Prisons, but it was

administratively transferred last year when the statute was rewritten to define it as an

Intermediate Punishments.

Type of Admissions

There are four types of admissions to prison: new admissions, probation revocations,

parole/ post- release supervision revocations, and safekeepers/ pre- sentence diagnostic inmates.

Type of Admission for 1999- 2000 Prison Entries

11,225

995

9,621

2,320

0

3,000

6,000

9,000

12,000

New Admissions Probation

Revocations

Parole/ Post-

Release

Revocation

Safekeeper/ PSD

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 6 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

The vast majority of admissions to prison in fiscal year 1999- 2000 are for probation revocations

( 47%) and new admissions ( 40%). New admissions result from a court- imposed active

sentence to prison. Revocations are a result of violations to the conditions of probation, parole,

or post- release supervision. Safekeepers are unsentenced defendants admitted to prison when

detention in the local jail poses a danger from other jail inmates, or presents a threat to others,

or when medical care is needed. Pre- sentence diagnostic admissions ( PSD) are inmates who

have been convicted, but the judge requests an assessment before sentencing.

Admissions by Sentencing Grids

The Structured Sentencing Act became effective in 1994. This sentencing policy prescribes

sentencing options for judges based on the severity of the crime and the prior record of the

offender. Judges are provided with specific sentencing options for the type and length of

sentence that may be imposed. DWI admissions and pre- structured sentencing inmates are

sentenced under different laws. The charts below illustrate the distribution of fiscal year 1999-

2000 prison admissions for misdemeanants and felons.

Structured Sentencing and Non- Structured Sentencing

Misdemeanor Admissions for 1999- 2000

Prior Record Level

Crime

Class

I II III Non-

Structured Total

A1 88 304 785 - 1,177

1 215 454 1,816 - 2,485

2 21 50 81 - 152

3 2 3 7 - 12

DWI - - - 2,229 2,229

Other - - - 110 110

Total 326 811 2,689 2,339 6,165

Note: This does not include offenders committed for parole revocations, safekeeper and

pre- sentence diagnostic admissions

Convictions for Class 1 misdemeanors represent the largest group of misdemeanor prison

admissions. Offenses in Class 1 include breaking and entering, and non- trafficking drug

offenses. Convictions for Driving While Impaired ( DWI) are the next largest contributor to

misdemeanor of admissions. These convictions are not part of Structured Sentencing but rather

under the Safe Roads Act of 1983. The third most numerous crime class for misdemeanor

admissions to prison is Class A1. Almost all of the Class A1 offenses are assaults. The

remainder of the misdemeanor offenses resulting in an admission to prison include worthless

checks, assaults, property and public order offenses.

Eighty- two percent of all felony prison admissions in fiscal year 1999- 2000 were for Class F

through Class I offenses. Class H, Prior Record II, offenses represent the largest group of felons

admitted to prison with 2,006 admissions in fiscal year 1999- 2000. Forty percent of all felony

admissions were for Class H offenses. The majority of these are non- trafficking drugs, breaking

and entering, and larceny crimes. Class I offenses make up the next largest group two- thirds of

which are for non- trafficking drug offenses, but also include forgery and breaking and entering.

Class G also includes non- trafficking drug offenses as well as trafficking drugs and robbery.

Sexual offenses, assaults and habitual driving while impaired are offenses in Class F.

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 7 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

Structured Sentencing and Non- Structured Sentencing

Felony Admissions for 1999- 2000

Prior Record Level

Crime

Class

I

0 pts

II

1- 4 pts

III

5- 8 pts

IV

9- 14 pts

V

15- 18 pts

VI

19+ pts

Non-

Structured Total

A 57 9 2 1 0 0 1 70

B1 54 34 14 13 1 0 0 116

B2 83 103 40 14 3 2 0 245

C 84 181 199 206 56 51 10 787

D 225 245 109 66 18 10 11 684

E 229 260 96 57 15 9 7 673

F 340 349 233 128 23 20 7 1,100

G 498 663 535 371 65 39 10 2,181

H 1,032 2,006 1,362 928 217 107 200 5,852

I 555 1,048 636 444 109 86 55 2,933

Other - - - - - - 16 16

Total 3,157 4,898 3,226 2,228 507 324 317 14,657

Note: This does not include offenders committed for parole revocations, safekeeper and

pre- sentence diagnostic admissions.

The remaining felony classes contain the most serious offenses. Class A is first degree murder

and carries a punishment of death or life without parole. The majority of Class B1 offenses are

sexual assaults. Most B2 admissions are for second degree murder but there are some first

degree murders and sexual assaults in this class. In Class C, there were 495 admissions of

habitual felons. Approximately 70% of Class D admissions are for robbery. Finally, Class E

contains mostly crimes against a person including assaults, kidnapping and abduction, robbery,

and manslaughter.

Crime Type of 1999- 2000 Prison Admissions

Overall, 68% of the 24,161 prison

admissions are for felony crime

convictions. Crimes resulting in a prison

sentence are grouped in one of three

categories: public order, property, and

crimes against a person.

The most frequent crime type for prison

admissions is public order crimes. This

crime type accounted for 44% of all

admissions during the 1999- 2000 fiscal

year. This crime type includes drug

offenses ( 5,616), Driving While Impaired

( 2,581), traffic violations ( 1,027), and

other public order crimes ( 1,295) such

as habitual felon and possession of a

firearm by a felon. Among public order

crimes admissions, 66% are for felonies.

Public

Order

44%

Not

Reported

5%

Property

28%

Crime

Against a

Person

23%

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 8 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

Property crimes accounted for 28% of all prison admissions. The most frequent offenses in this

category are larceny ( 2,531) and breaking/ entering ( 2,219). Other offenses include fraud ( 723),

forgery ( 563) and burglary ( 267). The majority of admissions ( 78%) for property crimes are

felons.

There are 5,672 admissions for crimes against a person, which is 23% of all prison admissions

in fiscal year 1999- 2000. Forty- four percent of these crimes are assaults ( 2,482). This category

also includes robbery ( 1,334), sexual offenses ( 975) and homicides ( 689). As with property

crimes, the majority ( 75%) of crimes against a person are felony admissions.

Crime Type of 1999- 2000 Admissions

Crime Type Felon Misdemeanant Total

Crimes Against a Person 4,234 1,438 5,672

Property 5,357 1,470 6,827

Public Order/ Other 6,920 3,639 10,559

Not Reported 5% ( mostly jail transfers during Hurricane Floyd) 1,103

Total 16,511 6,547 24,161

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 9 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

B. PRISON POPULATION

Prison Population Trend

On June 30, 2000 there were

31,396 offenders in the prison

system. The prison population

has remained stable over the

past four years, after a slight

increase from 1995 to 1996,

probably due to Structured

Sentencing policies and

resources.

Date Population

6- 30- 00 31,396

6- 30- 99 31,914

6- 30- 98 32,612

6- 30- 97 32,529

6- 30- 96 30,876

6- 30- 95 27,052

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000

Prison Population by Sentencing Grids

Structured Sentencing and Non- Structured Sentencing Misdemeanant

Prison Population as of June 30, 2000

Prior Record Level

Crime

Class

I II III Non-

Structured Total

A1 23 86 270 0 379

1 40 76 510 0 626

2 6 9 13 0 28

3 0 1 3 0 4

DWI - - - 691 691

Other - - - 104 104

Total 69 172 796 795 1832

Note: This does not include offenders committed for safekeeper or

pre- sentence diagnostic admissions

Although 27% of prison admissions in fiscal year 1999- 2000 are misdemeanants,

misdemeanants comprise only 6% of the population on June 30, 2000. This is largely due to

shorter sentence lengths for of misdemeanor offenses. The majority of misdemeanant inmates

in the prison population are incarcerated for DWI, Class A1 or Class 1 offenses ( Prior Record

Level of II or III).

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 10 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

Structured Sentencing and Non- Structured Sentencing Felony

Prison Population as of June 30, 2000

Prior Record Level

Crime

Class

I

0 pts

II

1- 4 pts

III

5- 8 pts

IV

9- 14 pts

V

15- 18 pts

VI

19+ pts

Non-

Structured Total

A 270 19 13 4 2 2 741 1,051

B1 176 154 78 49 6 7 0 470

B2 494 431 184 103 24 11 0 1,247

C 489 796 746 693 215 150 2,339 5,428

D 987 945 541 307 51 47 1,965 4,843

E 430 619 339 204 60 41 113 1,806

F 502 485 371 229 62 42 425 2116

G 764 762 685 535 109 91 119 3,065

H 517 1,198 1,154 961 285 198 1,793 6,106

I 234 430 307 277 80 61 135 1,524

Other - - - - - - 1,667 1,667

Total 4,863 5,839 4,418 3,362 894 650 9,297 29,323

Note: This does not include offenders committed as a safekeeper or for pre- sentence

diagnostic admissions.

The profile of the felony inmate population is very different from the profile of felony admissions

to prison. Class A- E offenses represent 18% of prison admissions but 51% of the prison

population on June 30, 2000. Felons have long sentences so they remain in the population over

a long period of time. For example, consider the difference in the admissions for Class A

offenders and the number in the population. There were 70 Class A admissions last fiscal year

and on June 30, 2000 there were 1,051 in the population. The sentence for these offenders is

either life in prison or death. On June 30, 2000 there were 209 inmates housed on death row.

Crime Type of Prison Population

Crime Type of Prison Population on June 30th of Each

Year

Crime

Against a

Person

Property

Public Order

0

10000

20000

30000

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 11 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

The graph illustrates the crime type of the prison population at the end of the fiscal year in 1995

through 2000. There have been minor changes in the composition of the prison population

during this time period, but these changes may increase over time. It is evident that the

proportion of property offenses in the prison population had decreased over the past five years,

from 28% of the population in 1995 to 19% in 2000. There has been an increase in the

proportion of both public order and crimes against a person in the prison population. Public

order offenses comprised 23% of the population in 1995 and have increased to 29% in 2000. In

1995, 49% of the population were incarcerated for crimes against a person and in 2000 it was

52%.

Crime Type in Population on June 30, 2000

Crime Type Felon Misdemeanant Total

Crimes Against a Person 15,894 424 16,318

Property 5,488 413 5,901

Public Order/ Other 8,134 1,015 9,149

Not Reported 28 0 28

Total 29,544 1852 31,396

Inmate Activities

The Division of Prisons coordinates a wide range of inmate work, educational, and

rehabilitative programs. Inmates are required to either work full time or to be assigned to a full

time program. Only inmates who pose a security risk, have health problems, or are in the

admissions process are exempt from the policy.

Work

In each prison facility, inmates are assigned a variety of jobs. Inmates are paid an incentive

wage, which is set by statute for the majority of these duties. Currently the incentive wage

ranges from $. 40 to $ 1.00 depending on the work assignment. Most inmates ( 67%) work inside

prison facilities.

Inmate Work Assignments

In Prison Facilities

Assigned on

June 30, 2000

Unit Services 4,278

Food Service 2,897

Correction Enterprises 2,100

Prison Maintenance 1,282

Construction 105

Other Jobs 800

Outside Prison Facilities

Road Squads 2,179

Community Work Crews / State and Local Government 1,979

Work Release 1,419

Total 17,039

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 12 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

Unit Services - The largest assignment in prison facilities is Unit Services. Prison inmates in

these jobs perform janitorial and general maintenance duties.

Food Service – Inmates work in the kitchens of all prison facilities preparing and serving food to

other inmates. This assignment provides a relevant job skill and is beneficial to the prison

system because it reduces the cost of operating the facilities.

Correction Enterprises - Correction Enterprises is a separate division of the Department of

Correction, which administers industries on prison sites. Enterprise jobs provide opportunities to

put close and medium custody inmates to work inside prisons. Inmates are employed making

car license tags, street signs and highway signs, farming, food processing, printing, sewing,

laundries, and manufacturing. These jobs teach workers job skills and a work ethic that will

enable them to find employment upon release for prison. These jobs earn up to $ 3 per day in

incentive wage based on skills required for the job.

Prison Maintenance - Prison inmates are also involved in grounds keeping, light construction,

repair, and maintenance projects at prisons. These jobs include roofing, plumbing, wiring, and

other unit improvements.

Construction - In addition to cleaning and maintaining prisons, some inmates are assigned to

new prison construction projects. Inmates are generally chosen based on pre- existing skills in

the construction industry. As with the other categories of work, this experience gives inmates

valuable work experience for their release and helps to reduce the cost of new construction.

Road Squads - Minimum and medium custody inmates work on the state's roads, patching

potholes, clearing right- of- way and picking up litter. Medium custody inmates work under the

supervision of armed correctional officers. Minimum custody inmates work under the direction of

Department of Transportation employees.

Community Work Crew / State and Local Government Agencies - Minimum or medium custody

inmates are assigned to Community Work Crews of ten inmates. One correctional officer

supervises them and they perform short- term, labor- intensive projects such as hurricane

cleanup, litter cleanup, painting schools and cleaning school buses.

Work Release - Inmates who have proven themselves worthy of limited release from custody

are allowed to leave the prison unit for jobs. These inmates are nearing their release date and

work for businesses in the community. North Carolina started the first work release program in

the country in 1957. Inmates on work release receive prevailing market wages from their

employers, but must pay a room- and- board fee to the prison unit. For fiscal year 1999- 2000

inmates paid the Department of Correction over $ 4.4 million in per diem ($ 14 per day) and over

one million dollars for transportation and job- related expenses. They also paid court costs, child

support, fines, victim’s compensation, and restitution. The total paid during the period for these

items was $ 2,436,445.

Programs

Inmates are recommended for participation in programs based on interests, abilities, needs

and whether the time remaining in their sentence allows completion of the program. Academic

and vocational education is offered on a full time basis at large institutions.

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 13 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

Inmate Program Assignments

Assigned on June, 30 2000

Full Time Part Time

Academic Education 2,048 986

Vocational Education 1,623 219

Life Skills Programs 376 2,639

Academic Program - The Division of Prisons works with the community college system to

provide a full range of academic programs in prison. Adult basic education is the primary

academic program for inmates. It provides the basic knowledge, skills and attitudes to make

adult and youth inmates literate. Educational programs also prepare inmates for meaningful and

satisfying roles as working, contributing members of society. Approximately ninety percent of

prison facilities offer academic programs for inmates. In 1999, more than two thousand inmates

passed the General Education Development ( GED) test. Inmates who complete the GED or

who possess a high school diploma may be considered for participation in several degree

programs and a special " Youth Offenders" program. Associate degree programs are offered by

community colleges and bachelor degree programs are offered at two prison sites through

Shaw University, a private university based in Raleigh, NC. The Department of Correction also

contracts with the University to provide Independent Studies courses and a limited number of

university credit classroom courses.

Vocational Program - A wide variety of vocational programs such as computer literacy, food

service training, electrical engineering technology, brick masonry, and job readiness are

provided through local community colleges. Participation in these programs can help inmates

obtain work with Correction Enterprise or a work release assignment.

Life Skills Programs – Life skills programs include several types of programs such as parenting

skills, team activities and Cognitive Behavioral Intervention ( CBI). CBI programs teach offenders

new skills and new ways of thinking that can lead to changes in their behavior and actions, and

ultimately affect their criminal conduct. CBI programs use a combination of approaches to

increase an offender’s awareness of self and others. This awareness is coupled with the

teaching of social skills to assist the offender with interpersonal problems. These specific types

of intervention programs assist an offender in “ restructuring” the thought process and teach

“ cognitive skills” to assist in basic decision- making and problem- solving. These programs are

lead by prison or community college staff that have been trained by the Department of

Correction.

Inmate Disciplinary Infractions

Inmate conformity to prison rules is necessary for the orderly, safe, and secure operation of

correctional facilities. Effective, fair, and consistent disciplinary procedures enhance the orderly

operation of the facility and reinforce appropriate behavior and responsibility. Disciplinary

offenses are divided into five classes, Class A offenses are the most serious and Class E

offenses are the least serious. An inmate can be charged with an attempt to commit an offense,

and that attempt is in the same Class as the infraction itself.

In the 1999- 2000 fiscal year there were 61,132 infractions. Of these, 1,769 were Class A

infractions of which 743 were assaults on staff. There were 10,290 Class B infractions

including provoking an assault, lock tampering, possession of a weapon or substance, and a

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 14 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

sexual act. The majority of the entire year’s infractions were for Class C offenses, of which

there were 39,779 or 65% of the total for the year. Approximately half of these, or 19,507 were

for disobeying an order. Other Class C infractions include profane language, fighting, verbal

threat, unauthorized leave, and theft of property. Being in an unauthorized location, possession

of unauthorized items ( including clothing and money), and tampering with property are some of

the infractions that make up the 9,123 in Class D. The last category, Class E had relatively few

( 171) including faking an illness, misusing supplies, and an unclean room or body.

Most Frequent Inmate Disciplinary Infractions for 1999- 2000

Type of Infraction Count

Class A TOTAL 1,769

Assault Staff with Weapon 482

Assault Staff/ Throwing Liquids 261

Assault Person with Weapon 271

Class B TOTAL 10,290

Substance Possession 4,368

Sexual Act 2,406

Provoke an Assault 807

Weapon Possession 485

Interfere with Staff 469

Class C TOTAL 39,779

Disobey Order 19,507

Profane Language 8,733

Unauthorized Leave 2,973

Verbal Threat 2,226

Fighting 2,179

Class D TOTAL 9,123

Unauthorized Items ( including clothing and money) 4,501

Unauthorized Location 2,206

Property Tampering 836

Class E TOTAL 171

Fake Illness 68

Unkept Room or Unclean Body 46

Misuse Supplies 27

Total of all Infractions for 1999- 2000 61,132

Presumptive punishments are established for each offense such as: confinement in disciplinary

segregation for up to 60 days, demotion in custody, sentence reduction credits, suspension of

privileges including radio, organized sports, visitation, or other leisure time activities and

privileges.

Escapes and Captures

The primary goal of the Department is to protect the community. However, some inmates

escape from prison each year though most are apprehended. In 1999- 2000 there were 101

escapes. Of these, 98 were inmates assigned to minimum custody. Minimum custody inmates

are often on work release and participate in other activities in the community. Many escapes

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 15 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

are the result of the inmate not returning on time. Approximately 75% of escapes are captured

in two days or less and many in the same day. As of September 2000, there were only 6

individuals of the 101 that remained on escape.

In addition to returning recent escapees to prison, each year there are captures of inmates that

escaped in previous years. From July 1, 1999 to June 30, 2000 95 escapees from this year

were returned and 19 from previous years were captured, for a total of 114 captures by the

Department.

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 16 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

PRISON RELEASES

Prison Release Trend

During the fiscal year 1999- 2000,

there were 24,419 releases from

prisons. This is a decrease of 1,440

from the previous year.

Fiscal Year Total

1999- 2000 24,419

1998- 1999 25,859

1997- 1998 25,326

1996- 1997 22,789

1995- 1996 19,074

1994- 1995 23,466 0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

94- 95 95- 96 96- 97 97- 98 98- 99 99- 00

Releases from prison are affected by sentencing policies and prison resources. Inmates are

usually released from prison due to the expiration of their sentence or on parole ( sentences

prior to Structured Sentencing).

Type of Release

The majority ( 69%) of releases from prison in the 1999- 2000 fiscal year were due to the

expiration of an inmate’s sentence. An additional 17% of releases were released on parole.

Only non- structured sentence inmates are eligible for parole. In fiscal year 1998- 1999, 21% of

prison exits were for parole. This decrease in parole exits is expected to continue since the

proportion of the prison population sentenced prior to Structured Sentencing will continue to

decrease. However, the number of post- release inmates will increase. These are releases of

949 244

4,071

16,850

2,305

0

4,000

8,000

12,000

16,000

20,000

Expiration of

Sentence

Released on

Parole

Release

Safekeeper or

PSD

Released on

Post- Release

All Others

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 17 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

inmates incarcerated for Class E and higher offenses under Structured Sentencing. These

releases have a mandatory nine months of community supervision upon release.

Safekeeper and Pre- sentenced diagnostic ( PSD) releases are unsentenced inmates who are

held temporarily in prison. Most prison exits in the category labeled All Others are court ordered

releases, but also include the death of the inmate, Interstate Correctional Compact, and

execution. Through the Interstate Correctional Compact inmates are transferred to facilities in

other states. There were three executions in 1999- 2000.

Time Served by Inmates Released in Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

North Carolina enacted numerous sentencing laws in the 1970’ s, 1980’ s, and 1990’ s that

govern when and how inmates are released from prison. In 1994, North Carolina enacted

Structured Sentencing guidelines. The purpose of Structured Sentencing is to use prison for the

most serious and chronic offender, and to incarcerate those offenders for longer periods of time.

Less serious and less chronic offenders receive punishments in the community, or shorter

prison sentences. Structured Sentencing abolished discretionary parole release and authorized

judges to set a minimum and maximum sentence for felons and a flat sentence for

misdemeanants, based on the severity of the crime of conviction and the prior record level of

the offender. Felony Structured Sentencing inmates must serve the entire minimum sentence

and may served the maximum sentence, an additional 20% above the minimum sentence. For

example, an inmate with a minimum sentence of 5 years also has a maximum sentence of 6

years. The inmate must serve 5 years and may serve up to 6 years unless he earns credits off

of the maximum sentence for good behavior, working, and participating in programs. Therefore,

all felony inmates sentenced under Structured Sentencing will serve at least 100% of their

minimum sentence. In FY 1999- 2000, 10,275 Structured Sentencing felons were released from

prison. These inmates served, on average, 12 months in prison. Since Structured Sentencing

is relatively new, these releases reflect inmates with relatively short sentences for less serious

offenses. Time served is expected to rise in the future when inmates who are now receiving

long sentences under Structured Sentencing are released. These felony releases served 111%

of their minimum sentence.

Judges order misdemeanants to serve a specific sentence and they can earn 4 days per month

off the sentence for good behavior, working, and participating in programs. For example, a

misdemeanor inmate who has a sentence of 4 months must serve 3.5 months and may serve

up to 4 months. During this period, 3,404 Structured Sentencing misdemeanants were

released. These inmates served, on average, 3.9 months. They served, on average 95% of

their sentence.

Prior to Structured Sentencing inmates were sentenced under several different sentencing laws

that allowed the Parole Commission to release inmates early from prison on parole. Sentences

under these laws appear longer than Structured Sentencing sentences, but judges knew when

they ordered a sentence that the inmate would not serve anywhere near the full sentence. The

major determinants of when inmates were released from prison under these parole- eligibility

laws depended on the good time and gain time credits the inmate earned. Prior to Structured

Sentencing, as soon as the inmate entered prison, he was awarded good time credits which

reduced his sentence by 50%, and he could also earn additional gain time credits off of his

sentence for certain behaviors. Therefore, it is not possible to make accurate comparisons of

time served or percent of sentence served between inmates released from prison under

Structured Sentencing laws and non- Structured Sentencing laws. Comparisons are not

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 18 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

meaningful when the policies and intent of sentencing laws are so different. In fiscal year 1999-

2000, 1,619 non- Structured Sentencing felons were released from prison. On average,

because these inmates represented some very serious offenses, they served 68.6 months.

These inmates served, on average, 36% of their court- imposed sentence, due to good time,

gain time and parole eligibility rules. During this period, 1,367 non- Structured misdemeanants

were released from prison. These inmates served, on average, 4.5 months. These inmates

served, on average, 40%, of their court- imposed sentence due good time, gain time and parole

eligibility rules.

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 19 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

Demographics of Prison Admissions

July 1, 1999 through June 30, 2000

Age Male Female

Category White Black Other White Black Other Total

13 - 18 349 831 31 33 47 2 1,293

19 - 21 857 2,015 135 66 96 4 3,173

22 - 25 981 2,246 211 145 165 17 3,765

26 - 30 1,212 2,338 229 214 256 20 4,269

31 - 35 1,161 2,119 151 221 315 11 3,978

36 - 40 1,131 1,882 91 227 272 9 3,612

41 - 45 726 1,199 73 122 159 11 2,290

46 - 50 327 559 19 33 62 2 1,002

51 - 55 196 229 12 21 18 0 476

56 - 60 87 77 7 2 5 1 179

61 - 65 36 32 2 1 0 0 71

66 - 70 14 19 0 1 1 0 35

71+ 12 6 0 0 0 0 18

Total 7,089 13,552 961 1,086 1,396 77 24,161

Demographics of Prison Resident Population

on June 30, 2000

Age Male Female

Category White Black Other White Black Other Total

13 - 18 164 469 16 11 16 0 676

19 - 21 737 1,921 125 50 50 5 2,888

22 - 25 1,067 3,164 242 81 132 10 4,696

26 - 30 1,532 3,675 303 154 205 15 5,884

31 - 35 1,484 3,050 190 154 206 10 5,094

36 - 40 1,625 2,873 178 177 204 13 5,070

41 - 45 1,153 1,864 100 113 128 14 3,372

46 - 50 653 1,049 56 37 53 5 1,853

51 - 55 421 485 37 24 16 0 983

56 - 60 235 193 16 20 6 1 471

61 - 65 117 93 9 7 0 0 226

66 - 70 50 49 2 2 1 0 104

71+ 55 18 4 1 1 0 79

Total 9,293 18,903 1,278 831 1,018 73 31,396

Note: Additional prison inmate information can be obtained on the Office of Research and

Planning web page at http:// www. doc. state. nc. us/ rap/ rapweb/ web.

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 20 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

II. Division of Community

Corrections

The Division of Community Corrections provides supervision of offenders sentenced to

probation or released from the Division of Prisons on parole or for post- release supervision.

Probation/ parole officers control offenders in the community by enforcing compliance with the

conditions of probation, parole or post- release supervision and monitoring offender behavior.

Officers refer offenders to rehabilitative services and work with other agencies to encourage

participation in programs such as substance abuse treatment, mental health treatment,

educational, and vocational training. As of June 30, 2000 there were 111,208 offenders under

the supervision of the Division of Community Corrections. As of June 30, 2000, there were

1,981 probation/ parole officer positions in North Carolina.

The Structured Sentencing Act ( SSA), enacted in 1994, provides judicial guidelines for judges to

sentence offenders to a community punishment, intermediate punishment, or active sentence in

prison. As well as prioritizing prison resources for the most serious and chronic offenders, the

SSA shifts some less serious, less chronic offenders from prison sentences to intermediate

punishments in the community. Intermediate punishments are designed to be very intrusive and

intense, restricting the offender’s liberty while they remain in the community; community

punishments are not as restrictive. The judge determines whether to order an intermediate or a

community punishment based on the seriousness of the offense and the offender’s prior

criminal record. Examples of community punishments are traditional probation, community

service, and victim restitution. Examples of intermediate punishments are intensive supervision,

electronic house arrest, and boot camp.

In order to comply with the intent of the Structured Sentencing Act, the Division of Community

Corrections developed a new case management policy. Offenders on probation, parole, or

post- release supervision are supervised based on the court sentence received, conditions

imposed, their behavior, and needs. If an offender initially receives an intermediate punishment

in court, or if the Parole/ Post- Release Supervision Commission sets an intermediate sanction as

a special condition when the offender is released from prison, the offender will always be

supervised at an intermediate supervision level. The offender may progress or regress through

three intermediate supervision levels. An offender who receives a community punishment from

the judge will be supervised in one of three community supervision levels, depending on the

offender’s risk level as determined by the Offender Trait Inventory and the officer’s judgement. A

community punishment offender who violates his probation may subsequently receive an

intermediate punishment in court. After completing the intermediate punishment the offender

may, by demonstrating compliance, progress through the intermediate supervision levels and

return to a community supervision level.

Intermediate supervision officers are required to verify the residence and employment of

offenders, meet with offenders at their residence and/ or in the field, perform curfew checks at

the residence, contact the offender’s family, contact law enforcement/ other criminal justice

agencies/ service agencies involved with the offender, execute criminal record checks, and

monitor court indebtedness on a frequent basis. Community supervision officers have similar

requirements, but do not see offenders as often and do not perform curfew checks.

Intermediate supervision officers have more work experience than community supervision

officers, and they receive specialized training. They are required to conduct the vast majority of

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 21 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

offender contacts in the field, away from the relative safety of the office. These officers have

smaller caseload goals ( 60 active cases) than community supervision officers ( 90 active cases).

Officers who specialize in intensive supervision cases have lower caseload goals ( 25 active

cases).

The Division of Community Corrections also administers the Criminal Justice Partnership

Program ( CJPP). The CJPP is a grant program to local government to operate community

corrections programs. Local advisory boards determine the type of community corrections

program to operate ( e. g. day reporting centers, satellite substance abuse programs). There are

91 counties involved in the Partnership initiative. These programs provide varying degrees of

structure and monitoring to offenders, and a range of rehabilitative services.

Cost of Sanctions

The Department calculates an average cost of sanctions annually. The figures include the

direct costs of supervision and indirect administrative costs. The average daily cost of

supervising one offender ranges from $ 1.89 on regular probation/ parole to $ 12.23 on intensive

probation/ parole.

Program Daily Cost per Offender

Regular Probation/ Parole $ 1.89

Electronic House Arrest $ 6.41

Intensive Probation/ Parole $ 12.23

IMPACT Boot Camp $ 71.48

Drug Screening $ 4.12

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 22 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

A. Probation

Probation Entry Trend

During the fiscal year 1999- 2000,

there were 60,114 probation entries.

The number of entries to supervision

for probation has remained stable

over the past few years. Since the

adoption of the Structured

Sentencing Act in 1994, annual

probation entries increased

approximately 11,000.

Fiscal Year Total

1999- 2000 60,114

1998- 1999 60,378

1997- 1998 61,769

1996- 1997 58,460

1995- 1996 51,544

1994- 1995 49,476

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

94- 95 95- 96 96- 97 97- 98 98- 99 99- 00

Total Felon Misdemeanant

The majority of entries to probation are for misdemeanants. Felons represent 27% of the

probation entries for fiscal year 1999- 2000. This proportion has remained relatively consistent

over the past six years.

Crime Type of 1999- 2000 Probation Entries

The crimes of offenders entering

probation supervision are grouped in

one of three categories: public order,

property, and crimes against a person.

The most frequent crime type for

probation entries is public order crimes.

This crime type accounted for 52% of

all entries during the 1999- 2000 fiscal

year. The crime type resulting in the

most entries to probation is drug

offenses with 12,710 offenders. There

were 9,551 offenders entering

probation convicted of driving while

impaired and 5,833 of other traffic

violations.

Property crimes accounted for 30% of

all entries to probation. The most

frequent offense in this category is

Public

Order

52%

Property

30%

Not

Reported

1%

Crime

Against a

Person

17%

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 23 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

larceny ( 7,785). Other offenses include breaking/ entering ( 2,820), fraud ( 2,495), worthless

checks ( 1,329), and forgery ( 1,190).

There are 9,973 entries to probation for crimes against a person, which is 17% of all probation

entries in fiscal year 1999- 2000. The majority of these crimes are assaults ( 8,125). This

category also includes sexual offenses ( 926) and robbery ( 518).

Probation Population by Sentencing Grids

The Structured Sentencing Act prescribes punishments in the community based on the

seriousness of the crime and criminal history. The sentencing table below is for misdemeanors

entering probation.

Misdemeanor Sentencing Table for Probation Population on June 30, 2000

Prior Record Level

Crime

Class

I II III Non-

Structured Total

A1 2,216 3,264 1,593 - 7,073

1 12,663 12,422 5,244 - 30,329

2 3,351 3,173 1,010 - 7,534

3 1,073 846 336 - 2,255

DWI - - - 18,841 18,841

Other/ Undefined - - - 3,999 3,999

Total 19,303 19,705 8,183 22,840 70,031

Note: The other category contains offenders that had no Crime Class information.

Almost half ( 43%) of the misdemeanant probation population was convicted of Class 1 offenses.

The most frequent crime categories in the Class 1 offenses are larceny, non- trafficking drugs,

assault, and traffic violations. There were 18,841 probationers sentenced for driving while

impaired, which comprise 27% of the population at the end of the fiscal year. These offenders

are sentenced under separate legislation, the Safe Roads Act of 1983.

The third largest crime class in the misdemeanor grid is Class 2. The primary offenses in this

class are worthless checks, assault and other public order offenses. Almost all of the Class A1

offenses are assaults. The remaining class, Class 3, consists largely of non- trafficking drugs

and larceny convictions.

The felony sentencing table on the next page describes felons in the probation population at the

end of the 1999- 2000 fiscal year. The felony crime class with the largest number in the

probation population is Class H, representing 41% of all felons on probation. The offenses in

this crime class include non- trafficking drug offenses, larceny, breaking and entering, and fraud.

Another one- third of probationers were convicted of Class I offenses, largely non- trafficking drug

offense and forgery. Classes E and F represent the smallest proportion of felons on probation

on June 30, 2000. These classes include more serious offenses such as assault and sexual

offenses.

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 24 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

Felony Sentencing Table for the Probation Population on June 30, 2000

Prior Record Level

Crime

Class

I

0 pts

II

1- 4 pts

III

5- 8 pts

IV

9- 14 pts

V

15- 18 pts

VI

19+ pts

Non-

Structured Total

E 940 631 38 5 0 0 62 1,676

F 1,352 740 249 17 0 1 135 2,494

G 1,044 957 411 195 4 3 80 2,694

H 5,940 4,582 1,556 645 112 31 2,491 15,357

I 4,910 4,508 1,481 461 81 61 829 12,331

Other - - - - - - 2,673 2,673

Total 14,186 11,418 3,735 1,323 197 96 6,270 37,225

Note: The other category contains offenders that had no Crime Class information.

Probation Exit Trend

During the fiscal year 1999- 2000,

there were 59,242 probation exits.

Exits from probation rose sharply

between 1994- 1995 and 1997- 1998

due to the Structured Sentencing Act.

Since then the exits from probation

supervision have been stable. This

trend is very similar to entries to

probation.

Fiscal Year Total

1999- 2000 59,242

1998- 1999 60,262

1997- 1998 59,820

1996- 1997 54,082

1995- 1996 45,127

1994- 1995 43,616

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

94- 95 95- 96 96- 97 97- 98 98- 99 99- 00

Type of Probation Exits

Of all probation exits in fiscal year 1999- 2000, 26% were completions. In order to exit probation

supervision as a completion the offender must serve the entire term sentenced by the court and

meet all conditions of probation. Terminations, which accounted for 39% of exits, may be a

successful or unsuccessful end of probation supervision. The court may satisfactorly terminate

probation for several reasons. These may be cases in which all conditions of probation were

met early and the supervision ended. Other possibilities for exits in the termination category are

unsuccessful probation cases in which the offender absconded and is not apprehended or

received new criminal charges and probation ended due to incarceration.

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 25 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

Probation Exits in 1999- 2000 Fiscal Year

15,176

19,328

1,456

23,282

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

Completion Termination Revocation/ Elect to

Serve

All Other

Revocations/ Elect to Serve cases represent 33% of all exits from probation. An offender is

revoked due to non- compliance with the conditions of probation. Probation may be revoked for

technical violations of probations such as positive drug tests, non- reporting, failing to attend

treatment, or for additional criminal convictions. The “ All Other” category includes exits due to

the offender’s death, a change in the supervision, or the closure of a case sentenced in another

state but supervised in North Carolina through an Interstate Compact Agreement.

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 26 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

B. Post- Release

Post- Release Entry Trend

During the fiscal year 1999- 2000,

there were 937 entries to post-release

supervision. The number of

entries to supervision for post-release

has increased steadily since

1996- 1997 due to the Structured

Sentencing Act.

Fiscal Year Total

1999- 2000 937

1998- 1999 727

1997- 1998 394

1996- 1997 83

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

96- 97 97- 98 98- 99 99- 00

Post- release supervision is a re- integrative program for serious offenders who have been

sentenced and served prison terms. This form of supervision was created by the Structured

Sentencing Act to replace parole supervision for offenders who had served long prison

sentences and need assistance in readjusting to life outside of the correctional institution. All

offenders serving a prison sentence for a Class B1 through E felony conviction are supervised

for nine months to five years, depending on the offense, after completion of their required prison

term.

Post- Release Population by Structured Sentencing Grids

The 1996- 1997 fiscal year was the first year after the adoption of Structured Sentencing that

cases were assigned to post- release supervision. The Sentencing Grid below reflects the

population on post- release supervision at the end of the 1999- 2000 fiscal year. The number of

offenders in the grid is relatively small due to long prison sentences for the offenses in these

cells.

Felony Sentencing Table for the Probation Population on June 30, 2000

Prior Record Level

Crime

Class

I

0 pts

II

1- 4 pts

III

5- 8 pts

IV

9- 14 pts

V

15- 18 pts

VI

19+ pts Total

B1 - - - - - - -

B2 - - - - - - -

C 21 12 6 1 0 1 41

D 63 45 2 1 0 0 111

E 151 203 89 17 3 2 465

Total 235 260 97 19 3 3 617

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 27 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

There are no offenders convicted of Class B1 or B2 offenses on post- release because the

minimum sentence for those crimes is 7 years and 10 months. The distribution of the offenders

on post- release supervision will not adequately reflect the population convicted of these crimes

for many years due to the length of the sentences they serve.

The majority of offenders on post- release supervision on June 30, 2000 were convicted

of Class E offenses. Within Class E the largest portion ( 62%) of these were assaults. Other

examples of crime categories for Class E offenses on post- release supervision are

manslaughter kidnapping/ abduction, robbery, and sexual offenses. All inmates released to

post- release supervision for conviction of sexual offenses are supervised for five years. Among

those supervised for Class D offense, 86% had robbery convictions. The other predominant

crime categories in Class D were burglary and sexual assault. The largest number of the Class

C offenders were habitual felons, followed by sexual assaults and assaults.

Post- Release Exit Trend

During the fiscal year 1999-

2000, there were 782 post-release

supervision exits. The

trend of exits from post- release

supervision is very similar to

the entry trends.

Fiscal Year Total

1999- 2000 782

1998- 1999 490

1997- 1998 212

1996- 1997 18 0

200

400

600

800

1,000

96- 97 97- 98 98- 99 99- 00

Type of Post- Release Exits

Post- Release Exits in 1999- 2000 Fiscal Year

598

100

41 43

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

Completion Termination Revocation All Other

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 28 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

The majority ( 76%) of exits from post- release supervision were completions. When the offender

completes this period of supervision, the sentence for which the offender was placed on

supervision is terminated.

The second most common type of exit from post- release supervision was revocation, which

account for 13% of all exits. An offender on post- release supervision may be revoked for a

technical violation such as positive drug tests, non- reporting, failing to attend treatment, or for

additional criminal convictions. There are only a few terminations from post- release supervision.

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 29 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

C. Parole

Parole Entry Trend

During the fiscal year 1999- 2000,

there were 4,298 entries to parole

supervision. There has been a

steady decline in parole entries over

the past six years.

Fiscal Year Total

1999- 2000 4,298

1998- 1999 5,747

1997- 1998 8,224

1996- 1997 9,956

1995- 1996 10,141

1994- 1995 15,954

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

16,000

94- 95 95- 96 96- 97 97- 98 98- 99 99- 00

This decline in entries to parole is due to the adoption of Structured Sentencing. The Structured

Sentencing Act eliminated parole for offenders sentenced under those laws. The inmates that

are eligible for parole were sentenced for convictions under other sentencing laws. Since

approximately 32% of the prison population on June 30, 2000 were Non- Structured Sentencing

inmates, there will continue to be paroles but the annual decrease is expected to continue.

Crime Type of Parole Population

There were 3,911 offenders on parole

supervision on June 30, 2000. The

majority ( 82%) of these were felons.

Thirty- eight percent of this population was

convicted of property crimes. The most

frequent property crime categories were

larceny ( 495), breaking and entering

( 406), fraud ( 203), burglary ( 164), and

forgery ( 129).

The offenses in the crime against a

person category include robbery ( 391),

assault ( 251), and second- degree murder

( 148). The majority ( 59%) of public order

crimes were drug offenses ( 781), followed

by driving while impaired ( 381).

Public

Order

34%

Property

38%

Crime

Against a

Person

27%

Not

Reported

1%

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 30 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

Parole Exit Trend

During the fiscal year 1999-

2000, there were 5,621 exits

from parole supervision. The

decrease in exits from parole

supervision reflects the

decrease of entries to parole.

Fiscal Year Total

1999- 2000 5,621

1998- 1999 7,697

1997- 1998 10,830

1996- 1997 13,805

1995- 1996 15,233

1994- 1995 14,484

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

16,000

94- 95 95- 96 96- 97 97- 98 98- 99 99- 00

Type of Parole Exits

Parole Exits in 1999- 2000 Fiscal Year

3,719

455 772 675

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

Completion Termination Revocation All Other

The majority ( 66%) of exits from parole supervision were completions. The second most

common type of exit from parole supervision was revocation, which represents 14% of exits. An

offender on parole supervision may be revoked for the same types of technical violation as

probation and post- release cases.

The “ All Other” category includes cases where there was a change in the type of supervision,

closure of a case supervised in North Carolina but sentenced in another state, and offender

death.

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 31 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

Intermediate Sanctions for Supervised Offenders

Intermediate sanctions are sanctions that are more severe and restrictive than traditional

probation but less severe and restrictive than prison. Intermediate sanctions are also more

costly than traditional probation but less costly than incarceration in prison. They provide a way

to graduate punishment or control in the community by increasing or decreasing supervision

based on the offender’s behavior. Confinement in prison or jail always remains an option for

noncompliance with the court or Parole/ PRS Commission’s conditions. The six intermediate

sanctions in North Carolina are listed below, in order of most restrictive to least restrictive.

Split Sentence/ Special Probation - A probation sentence that requires the offender t to submit

to a period of imprisonment, not to exceed six months, followed by a term of probation under an

intermediate level of probation supervision.

IMPACT Boot Camp – A requirement that the offenders ( age 16- 30) resides in a state- run

quasi- military residential program for 90- 120 days, followed by an intermediate sanction level of

probation supervision.

Residential Community Correction Facility - A residential program where offenders are

required to reside in a specified facility for a specific period of time to participate in such

activities as substance abuse treatment, social skills training, education, and employment

training.

Intensive supervision – A strict probationary sentence that requires frequent face to face

contacts ( 5 per week) with a two- person officer team that oversees 25- 30 probationers,

compliance with a home curfew, submission to random drug tests, and fulfillment of community

service work hours and restitution obligations, for a period of six ( 6) months unless otherwise

specified by the Court or Parole Commission.

Electronic House Arrest – Requirements for the offender to remain at his/ her residence all

times ( except as approved by the officer), to place a monitoring device in the residence, and to

wear a transmitting device, for a specified period of time.

Day Reporting Centers – A requirement to report to a specified facility on a daily or otherwise

specified basis for a specified length of time to be monitored and to participate in activities such

as alcohol or chemical dependency treatment, anger management, cognitive thinking,

psychological counseling, social skills training, education, or employment training.

Intermediate Sanction Utilization in Fiscal Year 1999- 2000 ( Probationers/ Parolees/ PRS)

Sanction

Began in

Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

Population

as of June 30, 2000

Split Sentence/ Special Probation 3,383 546

IMPACT Boot Camp 1,112 196

Residential Community Correction Facility 939 375

Intensive Supervision 16,214 8,868

Electronic House Arrest 2,786 685

Day Reporting Centers 2,037 1,227

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 32 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

Special Supervised Offender Programs

The Division of Community Corrections offers a number of programs for offenders to participate

in during their sentence of supervision. These programs assist in supervision and provide a

specialized intervention to offenders.

Substance Abuse Screening Program – The Division of Community Correction’s Substance

Abuse Screening Program is an integral component of supervision. It provides the means for

identifying and monitoring offenders with substance abuse problems, and also serves as an

added safety measure. During fiscal year 1999- 2000, 153,801 specimens were tested from

probationers. Of tests performed for the Division of Community Corrections, 28% were positive

for drug use.

Probation/ Schools Community Partnership – The Division makes an agreement with high

schools in all 43 Judicial Districts to place officers with a specialized caseload of school age

offenders in high schools. The partnership increases contact with guidance counselors,

teachers, school resource officers, and school administrators to ensure school safety and to

improve the offender’s school attendance and behavior.

Sex Offender Control Program: This is a pilot program to increase the supervision of

offenders required to register as sex offenders. Specialized officers, with caseloads of 30,

closely monitor the offender. Offenders submit to polygraph tests to hold the offender

accountable and monitor compliance through the course of treatment. Officers take an active

role as a treatment team member. A special emphasis is placed on restricting contact with

children. The aim of this approach is to hold the offender accountable and prevent further

victimization.

Domestic Abuse Offender Control Program: The Division established specialized officer

caseloads to enhance supervision of domestic violence offenders. The initiative increases

offender control and requires treatment. Officers focus on community contacts and treatment

team planning, and are involved with victim advocates to ensure the safety of the victim.

Developmental Disabilities Grant: The Division has a grant funded by the North Carolina

Council on Developmental Disabilities to target services for offenders who have limited coping

and life skills due to cognitive impairment. The grant serves offenders in District 3A ( Pitt

County). This initiative creates a collaborative relationship with developmental disabilities

service providers. The initiative involves a specialized officer working with a social worker to

identify offenders with developmental disabilities. They create an individual treatment and case

plan to increase the probability of success on probation and to obtain needed services to foster

success after supervision.

Cognitive Behavior Intervention Program ( CBI): The Division delivers cognitive based

intervention programs to supervised offenders. CBI curricula include "“ Thinking for a Change”,

“ Problem Solving Skills”, and “ Reasoning and Rehabilitation.” The focus of CBI programs is

changing an offender’s thinking in order to change his/ her behavior. Officers in 30 locations

serve as the group facilitator and provide counsel to the offender through the outlined

curriculum.

Offender Management Model ( OMM): The Division of Community Corrections and TASC

( Treatment Alternatives to Street Crime), a program in the Department of Mental Health,

Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse Services designed an “ Offender Management

Model”. The model is a team approach to provide treatment and control of high risk/ high need

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 33 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

offenders under supervision in the community. Elements of the model include a screening and

assessment that reviews criminogenic need and substance abuse, individual case plans

developed for each offender, participation in cognitive behavioral interventions, and ongoing

joint staffings to share decision- making and to review and adjust plans. District 3B ( Craven and

Carteret counties) is the site of the first OMM demonstration service site and three more are

planned.

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 34 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

D. Criminal Justice Partnership Program

The Criminal Justice Partnership Act of 1994 expands sentencing options by adding community-based

sanctions for offenders receiving non- prison sentences. The Act created the Criminal

Justice Partnership Program ( CJPP), which provides state funds to help counties create

sentenced offender and pretrial release programs. A local advisory board is responsible for

developing, implementing, operating, monitoring, and evaluation a local community corrections

plan.

The goals of the CJPP are to reduce recidivism, reduce the number of probation revocations,

reduce alcoholism and other drug dependencies among offenders, and to reduce the cost of

incarceration. The populations eligible for Criminal Justice Partnership Program services are

pretrial detainees, intermediate punishment offenders ( misdemeanor or felony and especially

probation violations) and offenders serving terms of parole/ post- release supervision.

The types of programs eligible for CJPP grants include, but are not limited to: Day Reporting

Centers, Substance Abuse Services, Resource Centers, Employment/ Job Skills Training,

Education Services and Residential Facilities ( for programs targeting intermediate punishment

offenders); Pretrial Monitoring Services and Pretrial Electronic Surveillance ( for pretrial release

programs); and Aftercare Support Services ( for Post- Release Supervision programs).

There are two categories of CJPP local programs-- sentenced offender programs ( SOP) and

pretrial release program. Examples of sentenced offender programs include day reporting

centers, satellite substance abuse and resource centers. As of June 30, 2000, 91 of the 100

counties in North Carolina are participating in the Partnership. These counties operate 35 Day

Reporting Centers, 29 Satellite Substance Abuse Centers, 26 Pretrial Release Programs and 13

Resource Centers.

Although the counties have wide latitude on program design, all provide some combination of

substance abuse treatment, education and employment programs. Day reporting centers

combine sanctions and services. Offenders must report as required and participate in assigned

services. Satellite substance abuse centers provide a range of treatment services, on- site and

off- site. Resource centers coordinate a variety of program interventions, some on- site and

others off- site.

CJPP local programs store data in and report data from a computer system called the CJPP

Information Management System ( IMS). The following data was reported from the CJPP IMS

Sentenced Offender Program Statewide Summary Report.

The CJPP cost per offender per day for the 1999- 2000 fiscal year is $ 10.30. Cost is calculated

by dividing total grants to local CJPP programs by an estimated average daily population in

CJPP programs. To this is added any administrative costs relating to state CJPP, DCC and

DOC staff.

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 35 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

1999- 2000 Admissions to Criminal Justice Partnership Programs

During the 1999- 2000 fiscal year, there

were 3,917 admissions to CJPP

Sentenced Offender programs. This

represents an increase of 17% over FY

1998- 1999, when admissions were

3,362.

Of the offenders admitted to local CJP

programs during FY 1999- 2000, the

state courts referred 65%. One- third

( 33%) of admissions result from

probation officers exercising delegated

authority, and just under 2% of

admissions are referred by the Parole

Commission.

CJPP Admissions by Sentencing Grids

Misdemeanor Sentencing Table for Admissions to Criminal Justice Partnership

Programs for 1999- 2000 Fiscal Year

Prior Record Level

Crime

Class

I II III Non-

Structured Total

A1 58 109 64 - 231

1 259 354 193 - 806

2 45 102 34 - 181

3 15 37 20 - 72

Other/ Undefined - - - 147 147

Total 377 602 311 147 1,437

Of the offenders admitted to the sentenced offender component of CJPP, 38% were

misdemeanants. A little more than half ( 56%) of all misdemeanants were convicted of Class 1

crimes. Crimes in Class 1 include non- trafficking drug offenses, larceny, assault, and breaking

and entering. The next largest misdemeanant crime class contributor to CJPP admissions was

Class A1. The majority ( 93%) of offenders convicted of crimes in Class A1 are convicted of

assault.

The majority ( 62%) of all Criminal Justice Partnership Program admissions for the 1999- 2000

fiscal year were felony offenders. Two- thirds of the felony offenders admitted were convicted for

Class H or I offenses. The most frequent Class H offenses are non- trafficking drug offenses,

larceny, and breaking and entering. Class I offenses include non- trafficking drug offenses and

forgery. There were 294 admissions for Class G offenses which include non- trafficking drug

offenses and robbery.

Referral Sources for CJPP

Admissions

Court

65%

Parole/

Post-

Release

2%

Probation

33%

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 36 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

Felony Sentencing Table for Admissions to Criminal Justice Partnership

Programs for 1999- 2000 Fiscal Year

Prior Record Level

Crime

Class

I

0 pts

II

1- 4 pts

III

5- 8 pts

IV

9- 14 pts

V

15- 18 pts

VI

19+ pts

Non-

Structured Total

E 54 47 0 0 0 0 - 101

F 43 39 24 0 0 0 - 106

G 96 138 36 23 1 0 - 294

H 255 439 151 59 10 0 - 914

I 157 282 185 50 4 5 - 683

Other 3 2 1 1 1 0 249 257

Total 608 947 397 133 16 5 249 2,355

Note: Excludes 125 offenders with no sentencing information recorded.

CJPP Population and Services

On June 30, 2000 there were 2,145 offenders in CJPP Sentenced Offender programs. This

represents an increase of 26% over June 30, 1999, when the population was 1,702. CJPP local

programs provide a wide array of treatment, education and employment services to sentenced

offenders. Many of these services are listed in the table below.

CJPP Service Description

Number of

Offenders Served

Count of Total

Service

Counseling/ Therapy Services 814 4,855

Outpatient Substance Abuse Treatment 784 7,832

Intensive Outpatient Substance Abuse Treatment 741 11,585

GED Classes/ High School 514 6,176

Life Skills Training 364 1,648

Job Seeking Skills 270 832

Adult Basic Education Classes 250 4,113

Drug Education 204 776

AA/ NA Support Groups 176 1,133

Cognitive Behavioral Intervention 172 1,059

Work Program 161 865

Vocational Training 160 1,734

Job Placement 134 539

Drug Aftercare 109 596

Anger Management 105 467

Other Services 385 4,066

Total 5,343 48,276

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 37 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

During the 1999- 2000 fiscal year, CJPP local programs provided such services to 5,343

offenders. The most- used services were regular and intensive outpatient substance abuse

treatment services ( 1,525 offenders), counseling or therapy services ( 814 offenders), general

equivalency diploma ( GED) ( 514 offenders), life skills training ( 364 offenders) and job seeking

skills ( 270 offenders).

The “ Other Services” category contains a wide variety of services provided to offenders. These

include parenting classes, sex offender services, domestic violence services, educational

counseling, residential substance abuse treatment and halfway house stays, and mentoring

programs.

Additional information about programs is gather when offenders exit the local Partnership

programs. Local programs provided 4,497 services to offenders who exited CJPP programs

during the 1999- 2000 fiscal year. Of those, 2,084 ( 46%) services were completed successfully.

Some of the more frequently used services included individual counseling, with a service count

of 640 and general equivalency diploma ( GED) classes were provided for 356 offenders that

exited during the fiscal year. Of offenders who exited CJPP in FY 2000, one- quarter obtained or

maintained employment while in the program.

1999- 2000 Exits from Criminal Justice Partnership Programs

During fiscal year 1999- 2000 there were 3,550 exits from CJPP Sentenced Offender programs.

Of these exits, 1,267 ( 36%) were successful completions of the program. This is an increase

over the completions from the 1998- 1999 fiscal year when there were 885 successful

completions out of 2,941 exits, for a completion rate of 30%.

1,267

528

251

353

1,151

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

Completion Removed Revocation/ Elect

to Serve

Absconded

Supervision

Other

The second most frequent type of exit from Partnership programs is when an offender is

removed ( 32%). This is an unsuccessful exit and occurs when an offender is not adequately

participating in programs. The offenders that have their probation revoked or elect to serve

represent 15% of the CJPP exits and absconders from supervision contribute another 7%.

The “ Other” category includes offenders that transferred from the program, never reported to

program, were inappropriate for the program, or released for medical reasons.

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 38 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

Demographics of Community Corrections Supervision Admissions

July 1, 1999 through June 30, 2000

Age Male Female

Category White Black Other White Black Other Total

13 - 18 2,956 2,884 330 758 699 49 7,676

19 - 21 2,959 3,354 536 680 823 64 8,416

22 - 25 2,928 3,796 777 822 953 89 9,365

26 - 30 3,281 4,038 739 1,019 1,105 68 10,250

31 - 35 2,961 3,515 478 1,024 1,058 78 9,114

36 - 40 2,923 3,380 293 977 847 68 8,488

41 - 45 1,986 2,332 188 561 561 33 5,661

46 - 50 1,029 1,313 73 249 257 19 2,940

51 - 55 567 678 43 126 107 10 1,531

56 - 60 268 298 16 65 29 4 680

61 - 65 147 111 8 25 21 0 312

66 - 70 76 65 6 10 4 0 161

71+ 39 46 4 8 5 0 102

Total 22,120 25,810 3,491 6,324 6,469 482 64,696

Demographics of Community Corrections Supervision Population

on June 30, 2000

Age Male Female

Category White Black Other White Black Other Total

13 - 18 2,561 2,516 281 562 607 39 6,566

19 - 21 5,012 5,070 722 1,048 1,166 97 13,115

22 - 25 5,737 6,717 1,451 1,403 1,738 129 17,175

26 - 30 6,251 7,305 1,560 1,780 2,106 132 19,134

31 - 35 5,594 6,032 966 1,879 1,978 161 16,610

36 - 40 5,608 5,750 638 1,950 1,776 98 15,820

41 - 45 3,991 4,244 378 1,212 1,210 64 11,099

46 - 50 2,143 2,552 180 542 562 30 6,009

51 - 55 1,182 1,299 77 273 233 17 3,081

56 - 60 589 560 46 138 64 7 1,404

61 - 65 319 269 17 46 28 1 680

66 - 70 150 109 7 16 7 1 290

71+ 111 87 7 12 8 0 225

Total 39,248 42,510 6,330 10,861 11,483 776 111,208

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 39 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

Demographics of CJPP Sentenced Offender Admissions

July 1, 1999 through June 30, 2000

Age Male Female

Category White Black Other White Black Other Total

10- 19 yrs 238 272 13 37 28 0 588

20- 29 yrs 555 827 43 148 144 12 1,729

30- 39 yrs 311 381 17 138 114 8 969

40- 49 yrs 151 202 8 61 78 3 503

50- 59 yrs 33 65 3 8 7 0 116

60- 69 yrs 5 4 0 1 0 0 10

70- 79 yrs 2 0 0 0 0 0 2

Total 1,295 1,751 84 393 371 23 3,917

Note: Additional information on DCC supervised offenders can be obtained on the Office of

Research and Planning web page at http:// www. doc. state. nc. us/ rap/ rapweb/ web.

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 40 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

III. Division Of Alcoholism and

Chemical Dependency Programs

The mission of the Division of Alcoholism and Chemical Dependency Programs is to plan,

administer and coordinate chemical dependency treatment, recovery, and continuing care

programs and services in the Department of Correction. The Division administers four offender

treatment programs.

The prison- based Drug and Alcohol Recovery Treatment ( DART) program offers a continuum of

treatment, recovery, and aftercare services to offenders near the beginning of their stay in

prison. The DART services continuum begins during diagnostic processing when inmates are

screened to determine if they need substance abuse treatment. If treatment is indicated,

inmates are either referred to the DART 35- day program, or the DART 24- hour ( 3 days)

program.

The DART 35- day program is a facilitated 12- Step program, based on the Minnesota Model. It

is available in 15 Intensive Residential Treatment centers located in prisons across the state.

Following the 35- day stay, the inmate returns to the regular population and participates in a

formal 8- 12 week aftercare program. The DART 24- hour program lasts 24 hours over a three or

four day period. This program is an educational orientation program designed to engage

offenders in the recovery process. It is located in minimum security prisons across the state and

at Western Youth Institution.

After participation in either of the DART programs, inmates may participate in Alcoholics

Anonymous ( AA) or Narcotics Anonymous ( NA), self- help groups that assist in the recovery

process. When inmates who completed DART 35 and participated regularly in AA or NA are

within six weeks of release they are referred to a special community transition program known

as the Winners' Circle. The DART program involves inmates who have successfully completed

the program as ancillary staff, peer counselors, role models, or treatment facilitators. In

addition, DART involves community volunteers to the greatest extent possible.

The State Alliance for Recovery and General Education ( SARGE) program is a federally funded

program designed specifically to treat addicted youthful offenders incarcerated in the North

Carolina Department of Correction. The program is an intensive residential treatment program,

based on the Hazelden model and it accommodates the inmate’s educational needs. SARGE

serves youthful offenders who are within six to twelve months of release and develops aftercare

plans for an inmate’s return to the community. The SARGE program has 96 beds at Morrison

Youth Institution in Hoffman and as of October, 1999 opened 40 beds at Sandhills Youth

Center.

The Department of Correction contracts with four private facilities to provide residential

treatment to inmates nearing their release from prison. These facilities operate as minimum

security prisons. These programs include the following 1) Right Turn of North Carolina

( Charlotte); 2) Evergreen Rehabilitation Center ( St. Paul); 3) Cornell Corrections Inc. ( Durham);

and 4) Mary Frances Center ( Tarboro). These contractual facilities use a variety of treatment

modalities, blending 12- step concepts with other clinical approaches. They also coordinate

other rehabilitative programs such as work release, community service projects, and vocational

training. The contractual facilities can serve up to 350 inmates; 100 of the beds are reserved for

women, the other 250 are for men. Inmates are not released directly from these facilities; they

return to a regular prison unit for discharge.

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 41 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

The Division offers a specialized program, DWI DART- Cherry, for probationers or parolees

convicted of driving while impaired ( DWI). It is located on the grounds of Cherry Hospital in

Goldsboro. Participation in this program may be ordered as a condition of probation by a judge

or by the Parole/ Post- Release Commission as a condition of parole. DWI DART- Cherry has

two components, a 28- day residential 12- step program for 100 probationers and parolees, and a

90- day modified therapeutic- community program for 200 probationers. Upon completion of the

program, offenders return to the community under the supervision of their probation/ parole

officer.

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 42 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

Identifying Inmates for Participation in DART

Diagnostic centers in the prison facilities listed in the table below complete the intake process

for prison admissions. Trained staff conduct interviews and perform screenings for inmates.

They use the Short Michigan Alcohol Screening Test ( SMAST) and the Chemical Dependency

Screening Test ( CDST) to identify inmates with a substance abuse addition. Inmates with a

score of 3 or more on either instrument are considered to have a problem with alcohol or drugs.

Once a problem is identified by these screening instruments and diagnostic personnel gather

other information, a referral is made for treatment in one of the DART programs. In addition, in

some cases, inmates are ordered by a judge to receive substance abuse treatment.

1999- 2000 Screenings and Referrals to DART by Facility of Admission

Facility 1999- 2000

Admissions

Number

Screened

Identified with

Alcohol/ Drug

Problem

Referred to

DART

Central Prison 1,359 1,232 603 740

Craven 4,838 4,775 2,857 3,122

Fountain Women 700 697 582 270

NCCI Women 1,550 1,541 1,221 1,239

Nuese 3,788 3,485 2,689 901

Piedmont 4,437 4,338 2,868 3,274

Polk Youth 2,318 2,308 903 1,071

Rowan 1,736 1,551 1,244 639

Western Youth 1,066 953 504 757

Totals 21,792 20,880 13,471 12,013

The majority ( 96%) of inmates admitted are screened for alcohol and drug additions. Of all

inmates screened, 65% are identified as having a problem with alcohol or chemical

dependency. More than half ( 55%) all admissions were referred to DACDP for alcohol and drug

treatment services. Of those identified as having an alcohol or drug addiction problem, 89%

receive a referral to DART.

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 43 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

A. Drug Alcohol Recovery Treatment

Intensive Residential Treatment

( DART - IRT)

Inmates assessed as needing treatment are referred to in- prison DART Intensive Residential

Treatment ( IRT). All in- prison treatment, which is scheduled at the beginning of incarceration, is

designed to introduce offenders to a lifelong plan of addiction recovery. The mission of the

program is to “ provide comprehensive interventions, programs and services that afford

offenders with alcohol or drug problems the opportunity to achieve self actualized recovery.”

1999- 2000 Enrollment in Dart Intensive Residential Treatment

Facility

Annual Inmates

Enrolled

Daily Average

Enrollment

Black Mountain Women 48 6

Brown Creek 659 51

Caswell 342 25

Central Prison 157 14

Craggy 396 28

Dan River Work Farm 29 27

Duplin 249 32

Foothills 254 19

Haywood 150 25

Lumberton 233 24

Marion 223 25

Nash 285 24

NCCI Women 713 57

Pasquotank 187 19

Pender 699 57

Piedmont 798 65

Polk Youth 324 22

Tyrrell Work Farm 312 37

Wayne 1,090 76

Western Youth 483 33

Total 7,631 590

Note: Daily Average enrollment is based on the number of inmates assigned divided

by the number of days the program was operational.

The table lists each facility with an intensive residential treatment program during the 1999- 2000

fiscal year. A total of 7,631 inmates were enrolled in these programs during the year. The

average enrollment is computed by dividing each facility’s daily enrollment by the number of

days the program was operational at the facility. On average, 590 inmates were enrolled in

DART IRT programs on any given day in the 1999- 2000 fiscal year.

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 44 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

Crime Type of Entries to DART Intensive Residential Treatment

The crimes of offenders entering

Dart IRT in the 1999- 2000 fiscal

year are grouped in one of three

categories: public order,

property, and crimes against a

person. The most frequent crime

type for DART IRT entries is

public order crimes. This crime

type accounted for 41% of all

entries during the fiscal year.

The crime category resulting in

the most entries for public order

crimes is drug offenses with

2,028 counts. There were also

345 offenders entering DART

IRT convicted of driving while

impaired.

Property crimes accounted for

31% of all entries to DART IRT. The most frequent offense in this category is

breaking and entering ( 942). Other offenses include larceny ( 699), fraud ( 276), and forgery

( 216).

There are 2,127 entries to DART IRT for crimes against a person, which is 28% of all DART IRT

entries in fiscal year 1999- 2000. The majority of these are convicted of robbery ( 764). This

category also includes assaults ( 555) and sexual offenses ( 470).

1999- 2000 Exits from DART Intensive Residential Treatment

There are several different types of exits from the DART Intensive Residential Treatment

program. An exit is considered a completion when an inmate satisfactorily participates in all 35

days of the treatment program. At that time they return to their unit and the aftercare portion of

the recovery process begins. In the 1999- 2000 fiscal year, there were 5,278 completions of

DART IRT. This represents the majority ( 70%) of all exits from the program.

Due to the coding procedures for exits from DART IRT, it is unclear if the inmates that exited the

program in the Removed/ Transferred category were successful in the program. This category

includes those that ended participation in the program due to release, transfer, disciplinary

action, or were simply dropped or removed. It is possible that an inmate was participating

satisfactorily in the program but was removed for disciplinary problems outside of the program

or was released from prison. Twenty- six percent of all 1999- 2000 fiscal year exits were in the

Removed/ Transferred category. The remaining 255 ( 3%) “ Other” exits from DART IRT were not

defined any further.

Crime

Against a

Person

28%

Property

31%

Public

Order

41%

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 45 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

DART Intensive Residential Treatment Exits in 1999- 2000 Fiscal Year

5,278

255

1,956

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

Completion Removed/ Transferred All Other

B. Drug Alcohol Recovery Treatment 24

( DART- 24)

Inmates with misdemeanor convictions have relatively short stays in prison, making it difficult to

complete long- term in- prison treatment. The Division of Alcohol and Chemical Dependency

Programs developed DART 24 for such inmates. DART 24 is an educational program to

introduce the recovery program to inmates. It consists of six or eight sessions over several

days, for a total of 24 hours of contact time.

1999- 2000 Enrollment in DART- 24

Facility

Annual Number of

Inmates Enrolled

Black Mountain Women 24

Davidson 90

Fountain Women 292

Guilford 3

Hyde 29

Neuse 787

North Piedmont 103

Raleigh Women 89

Rowan 576

Western Youth 237

Total 2,230

Crime Type of Entries to DART- 24

The crimes of offenders entering Dart- 24 in the 1999- 2000 fiscal year are grouped in one of

three categories: public order, property, and crimes against a person. The most frequent crime

type for DART- 24 entries is public order crimes. This crime type accounted for 60% of all

entries during the fiscal year. The majority ( 63%) of entries in the public order category were

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 46 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

driving while impaired convictions

with 834. There were also 325

offenders entering DART- 24

convicted of drug offenses.

Property crimes accounted for 22% of

all entries to DART- 24. The most

frequent offenses in this category are

larceny ( 215), breaking and entering

( 103), fraud ( 53), and forgery ( 43).

The final crime category contains

crimes against a person. There are

414 entries to DART- 24 for this

category, which is 18% of all DART–

24 entries in fiscal year 1999- 2000.

The majority of these are convictions

for assault ( 312) but it also includes

robbery ( 63) and sexual offenses

( 13).

1999- 2000 Exits from DART- 24

There are three exit types from DART 24, which are completion, removal/ transferred, and other.

There were a total of 2,258 exits from DART- 24 programs in the 1999- 2000 fiscal year. The

majority ( 82%) of all exits from the program were completions. An inmate is considered to

complete the DART- 24 program by satisfactorily participating in the activities assigned for the

duration of the program.

A small proportion ( 16%) of exits from DART- 24 during the1999- 2000 fiscal year were due to an

inmate being removed from the program or transferred to a different unit. There were 364 in the

Removed/ Transferred category. The remaining 34 ( 2%) “ Other” exits from DART- 24 were not

defined any further.

DART- 24 Exits in 1999- 2000 Fiscal Year

1,860

34

364

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

Completion Removed/ Transferred Other

Crime

Against a

Person

18%

Property

22%

Public

Order

60%

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 47 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

C. State Alliance for Recovery and

General Education ( SARGE)

The SARGE program is based on a substance abuse treatment curriculum designed for

offenders ranging in age from 18 to 22 years. It includes cognitive behavioral interventions and

units on criminal thinking and violent behavior.

SARGE provides six to twelve months of residential treatment ( Phases I and II) and three

months of transition aftercare ( Phase III). The aftercare phase follows release from prison or

detention. Program staff arrange for aftercare services on an individual basis, through

contractual arrangements with service providers in the area where the youth is released from

prison.

1999- 2000 Enrollment in SARGE

Facility

Annual Inmates

Enrolled

Daily Average

Enrollment

Morrison Youth Institution 173 60

Sandhills Youth Center 85 36

Total 258 88

During the 1999- 2000 fiscal year there were 258 inmates that enrolled in the SARGE program.

There are two youth prison facilities in the state that have SARGE programs, Morrison and

Sandhills. Between these two facilities, approximately 88 inmates were enrolled in the program

on any given day during the past fiscal year. The SARGE program at Sandhills Youth Center

began in October of 1999. From October, 1999 through June 30, 2000 there was an average of

36 inmates enrolled in SARGE with a capacity of 40 at the Sandhills facility.

Crime Type of Entries to SARGE

The crimes of offenders entering

SARGE in the 1999- 2000 fiscal year

are grouped in one of three

categories: public order, property,

and crimes against a person. Each

of these crime types account for

approximately one- third of the

entries to SARGE.

There were 89 entries to SARGE for

property crimes and the most

frequent offenses are breaking and

entering ( 46) and larceny ( 31).

The majority of entries in the public

order category were drug offense

convictions, which account for 69 of

a total of the 84 public order crime

entries.

Crime

Against a

Person

33%

Property

34%

Public

Order

33%

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 48 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

The final crime category contains crimes against a person. There are 85 entries to SARGE for

this category in fiscal year 1999- 2000. These are convictions for robbery ( 37), assault ( 24), and

sexual offenses ( 18).

1999- 2000 Exits from SARGE

The types of exits for SARGE are different than for the DART programs. The program has a

longer duration ( six to twelve months) and more offenders may leave and return due to such

reasons as disciplinary action, court appearances, and medical treatment. Because each

temporary departure is considered an exit in OPUS Offender Population Unified System), one

offender may have several exits. For this reason, only an offender’s final exit is counted for this

report. Based on these criteria, 186 inmates exited SARGE in the 1999- 2000 fiscal year.

There are four types of exits from SARGE: completion of the program, released from prison,

released due to a disciplinary action, and a catchall “ Other” category. An exit due to completion

is defined as a successful completion of the program or participation in the program for six

months. The completion category based on this definition, accounts for 38% of the exits from

SARGE. By design, SARGE is scheduled for inmates when they are approaching their prison

release dates. There are 37 inmates ( 20%) that exited SARGE due to their release from prison.

SARGE Exits in the 1999- 2000 Fiscal Year

70

37 37 42

0

20

40

60

80

Completion - At

least 6 Months in

Program

Released from

Prison

Disciplinary Action Other

An additional 20% of the exits are due to the inmate leaving the SARGE program for disciplinary

actions. These are exits for which there was not a re- entry in the 1999- 2000 fiscal year. The

“ Other” category contains the remaining 22% of inmates that were removed, transferred,

dropped, or withdrew from the program.

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 49 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

D. Continuing Care,

Alcoholics Anonymous ( AA) and

Narcotics Anonymous ( NA)

DART Continuing Care consists of three parts – aftercare, recovery group and Winner’s Circle

programs. DART- Aftercare is an eight to ten week program for inmates in the early stages of

recovery in a prison setting. Recovery group means access to in- prison Alcoholics Anonymous

and Narcotics Anonymous groups.

Alcoholics Anonymous ( AA) and Narcotics Anonymous ( NA) are self- help recovery groups

based on the 12- step model of recovery. Offenders who participate regularly in AA or NA and

who are within six months of release from prison are referred to the Winner’s Circle. Winner’s

Circle is a 12- session program to prepare recovering inmates for release from prison. Part of its

purpose is to make the offender’s transition back into the community easier.

1999- 2000 Enrollment in Continuing Care

DART Aftercare AA NA

DART

Region

Annual

Entries

Daily

Average

Annual

Entries

Daily

Average

Annual

Entries

Daily

Average

Eastern 1,331 142 1,409 394 1,197 342

Central 1,839 386 2,983 788 3,151 843

Piedmont 2,394 299 2,829 919 2,495 830

Western 1,502 260 1,817 578 1,509 443

Total 7,066 1,088 9,038 2,679 8,352 2,457

The table above reports the enrollment to the continuing care programs in the four DART

regions in North Carolina. The daily average listed for each program is calculated by dividing the

number enrolled by the number of days in the year. During the 1999- 2000 fiscal year there were

7,066 offenders enrolled in DART aftercare across the state. On average, there were 1,088

inmates enrolled on any day during the past year.

The continuing care program with the highest enrollment during the year was Alcoholics

Anonymous ( AA). There were a total of 9,038 inmates that enrolled in AA during the year and a

daily average of 2,679 inmates enrolled. Narcotics Anonymous ( NA) enrollment was almost as

large as that of AA with 8,352 entries in the 1999- 2000 fiscal year and an average of 2,457

enrolled daily throughout the year.

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 50 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

E. Private Alcohol and Drug

Treatment Centers

The Division of Alcoholism and Chemical Dependency Programs ( DACDP) has contracts with

private providers for 350 minimum- security prison beds for residential treatment at four facilities

across the state. Referrals generally come from the courts, the Division of Prisons ( DOP) and

the Post- Release and Parole Commission. Inmates are transferred from other prison units to

these minimum custody prisons, and the treatment program lasts six to twelve months. Those

who successfully complete the program or who complete their sentence are released into the

community. Although based on 12- step concepts, the private alcohol/ drug treatment centers

address a much wider range of behavior than traditional chemical dependency programs. For

example, the programs address relapse avoidance, employment, education and vocational

needs.

To be eligible for this program, offenders must be at least 19, be in good health, not have a

detainer, and not be serving time for an assaultive crime. The primary referral source for the

private treatment centers is DOP program staff at the facilities.

1999- 2000 Enrollment in Private Treatment Centers

Facility Location

Annual

Enrollment

Daily Average

Enrollment

Cornell Companies, Treatment Center Durham, NC 132 73

Evergreen Rehabilitation Center St. Pauls, NC 123 74

Mary Frances Center Tarboro, NC 185 99

Right Turn of North Carolina Charlotte, NC 150 98

Total 590 344

Due to the length of the programs in these private treatment facilities, there may be occasion for

the inmate to leave the program and re- enter at a later date for court appearances, medical

treatment, or disciplinary actions. Each individual is only counted once in the enrollment figures

and in the exit numbers that are reported on the following page.

During the 1999- 2000 fiscal year there were 590 inmates enrolled in the private treatment

centers listed in the table above. The Mary Frances Center, the facility with the largest number

enrolled during the past fiscal year, serves female inmates. The other three are male facilities.

On average, the daily enrollment in the private treatment centers is 344 per day, calculated on

all of the days of the year.

Crime Type of Entries to Private Treatment Centers

The crimes of offenders entering private treatment facilities in the 1999- 2000 fiscal year are

grouped in one of three categories: public order, property, and crimes against a person. The

crime type of the majority of entries to private treatment facilities is public order. Public order

crimes accounted for 362 ( 61%) of all entries for the year. Convictions for drug offenses

represented the largest proportion of public order crimes ( 61%) with a count of 226. The

remaining public order crimes were mostly driving while impaired convictions ( 111).

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 51 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

Crime

Against a

Person

4%

Property

35%

Public

Order

61%

Property crimes contributed 35% to all

of the entries to private treatment

facilities with a total of 205 entries in

the category. The most frequent

crimes were breaking and entering

( 73), larceny ( 69), and fraud ( 36).

There were very few entries due to

convictions for crimes against a

person, and they accounted for only

4% of all entries. The majority of

entries that were attributed to this

category were for robbery convictions

( 16).

1999- 2000 Exits from Private Treatment Facilities

The table below lists the private treatment facilities and the length of stay for inmates exiting the

facility during the 1999- 2000 fiscal year. There were a total of 562 inmates that exited one of

the programs last year. As expected, the number of exits for each program is similar to the

number of enrollments, and the Mary Frances Center exits the largest number of inmates.

It takes six to nine months to complete the substance abuse treatment program in these private

treatment facilities. In the table below, the columns for 181- 365 days and over a year depict the

number of inmates enrolled a sufficient amount of time to complete the program. There were

317 inmates ( 56%) enrolled in private treatment facilities for more than six months. Nine

percent of the exits during the year were for inmates who were enrolled for less than 30 days.

Many of these exits occur when an inmate is transferred to a private treatment facility but once

there, is determined not to be appropriate for the treatment available at that facility.

Number of Exits by the Length of Stay in Private Treatment Facilities

Facility 0- 30

Days

31- 90

Days

91- 180

Days

181- 365

Days

Over

1 Year Total

Cornell Companies 14 11 31 52 18 126

Evergreen Rehabilitation 13 8 21 50 23 115

Mary Frances Center 12 24 53 62 25 176

Right Turn of NC 9 10 39 69 18 145

Total 48 53 144 233 84 562

There is some variation in the time spent in the facilities at the time of exit from each of the four

facilities. The facilities ranged from 49% to 64% of exits spending at least 180 days in the

facility. Evergreen had the highest proportion of exits ( 64%) that were in the facility for at least

180 days.

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 52 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

F. DWI DART - Cherry

DWI DART- Cherry is a residential treatment unit for male offenders on probation or parole for

DWI ( driving while impaired) or other drug- or alcohol- related offenses. The DWI DART- Cherry

facility, located in Goldsboro, has 300 beds. Of those, 100 beds are for the traditional 12- step

residential chemical dependency treatment program that lasts for 28 days. The other 200 beds

are for the modified therapeutic community ( TC) program, with a 90- day length of stay. DWI

DART- Cherry admits any eligible offender. However, if resources are limited, parolees take

priority over probationers for referrals to DWI DART- Cherry.

The TC model was implemented in September 1997. Research and clinical experience indicate

that longer treatment has more benefits. Thus, DACDP staff developed the modified TC with a

90- day format. The program is based on Stay N’ Out, a residential community transition and

aftercare program in New York.

Community aftercare is an essential DWI DART- Cherry component. The program pays for up to

48 hours of aftercare services to each person enrolled. It builds upon and continues treatment

after the transition from a residential program to the community.

DWI DART- Cherry staff members involve other DOC agencies in the treatment program.

Admission decisions are made by DACDP staff in collaboration with probation officers employed

by the DOC Division of Community Corrections. Probation officers also serve on treatment

teams that develop plans for residential treatment and discharge to the offender’s county of

origin.

DWI DART- Cherry Descriptive Statistics for the 1999- 2000 Fiscal Year

Annual Counts Parole Referral Probation Referral Total

Admissions 975 1,015 1,990

Completions 954 926 1,880

Exits Other than Completions 21 89 110

There were 1,990 admissions to DWI DART- Cherry for the 1999- 2000 fiscal year. Of those

admitted, 94% exited as completing the program. The table below indicates that the majority of

offenders were referred to aftercare services upon leaving the DWI DART- Cherry program. The

majority ( 89%) of aftercare service providers are public agencies.

Type of Agency Number of Referrals

Public Agencies

Local Area Mental Health Centers 872

Drug Treatment Courts 3

Criminal Justice Partnership Programs ( CJPP) 45

Treatment Alternatives to Street Crime ( TASC) 723

Subtotal of Public Agencies 1,643

Contract Providers 196

Total 1,839

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 53 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

Demographics of DART Intensive Residential Treatment

Entries from July 1, 1999 through June 30, 2000

Age Male Female

Category White Black Other White Black Other Total

13 - 18 178 302 7 5 1 0 493

19 - 21 286 485 35 14 18 1 839

22 - 25 384 664 60 62 31 5 1206

26 - 30 473 724 45 64 68 4 1378

31 - 35 407 681 53 78 107 4 1330

36 - 40 363 630 33 77 77 2 1182

41 - 45 227 390 18 41 55 3 734

46 - 50 106 158 6 14 20 0 304

51 - 55 33 59 3 4 4 0 103

56 - 60 21 18 1 2 0 0 42

61 - 65 6 9 0 0 0 0 15

66 - 70 2 3 0 0 0 0 5

Total 2486 4123 261 361 381 19 7631

Demographics of DART 24 Entries

from July 1, 1999 through June 30, 2000

Age Male Female

Category White Black Other White Black Other Total

13 - 18 78 144 8 4 1 0 235

19 - 21 37 22 5 18 10 1 93

22 - 25 88 49 10 20 15 0 182

26 - 30 129 91 11 54 51 2 338

31 - 35 165 138 12 61 53 8 437

36 - 40 167 157 5 60 69 3 461

41 - 45 97 120 7 25 26 4 279

46 - 50 44 57 2 4 10 0 117

51 - 55 25 21 1 6 2 0 55

56 - 60 10 9 1 1 0 0 21

61 - 65 4 5 0 0 0 0 9

66 - 70 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

71+ 2 0 0 0 0 0 2

Total 847 813 62 253 237 18 2230

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 54 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

Demographics of SARGE Entries

from July 1, 1999 through June 30, 2000

Age Male

Category White Black Other Total

13 - 18 4 2 1 7

19 - 21 102 142 7 251

Total 106 144 8 258

Demographics of Private Alcohol/ Drug Treatment Centers

Entries from July 1, 1999 through June 30, 2000

Age Male Female

Category White Black Other White Black Other Total

13 - 18 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

19 - 21 6 6 2 5 2 0 21

22 - 25 16 36 0 12 5 1 70

26 - 30 37 44 3 22 13 0 119

31 - 35 25 55 3 18 11 1 113

36 - 40 30 40 4 27 20 1 122

41 - 45 20 42 1 15 19 1 98

46 - 50 11 12 1 2 9 0 35

51 - 55 2 6 0 0 1 0 9

56 - 60 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

61 - 65 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

Total 149 242 14 101 80 4 590

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 55 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

Division of Prisons and Division of Community Corrections

Populations By County of Conviction

Admissions or Entries

From July 1, 1999 to June 30, 2000

Resident or Supervised

County of on June 30, 2000

Conviction Prison Probation Parole Post

Release

Prison Probation Parole Post

Release

Alamance 722 1,352 58 26 707 2,144 29 19

Alexander 66 263 18 2 81 446 8 1

Alleghany 22 82 6 0 31 199 5 0

Anson 113 231 27 7 142 459 21 4

Ashe 26 126 9 0 47 231 9 0

Avery 17 62 2 0 22 125 1 0

Beaufort 253 503 27 8 273 921 27 5

Bertie 105 215 12 7 143 329 9 2

Bladen 81 271 19 5 126 588 12 3

Brunswick 195 453 32 1 181 819 29 2

Buncombe 563 1,362 100 18 960 2,245 88 13

Burke 270 444 66 2 232 905 37 3

Cabarrus 543 1,072 68 26 541 1,861 44 18

Caldwell 254 404 76 2 261 822 54 2

Camden 6 34 3 0 10 60 2 0

Carteret 150 452 28 1 158 724 13 1

Caswell 70 171 6 3 93 313 10 2

Catawba 345 833 80 5 378 1,394 40 6

Chatham 57 153 10 5 101 355 4 1

Cherokee 48 135 12 0 66 298 5 0

Chowan 46 138 6 1 46 201 6 1

Clay 6 58 3 0 9 108 1 1

Cleveland 236 482 37 12 321 819 28 11

Columbus 210 484 24 13 225 804 25 5

Craven 304 668 47 12 382 1,127 44 8

Cumberland 912 2,128 183 62 1,392 3,740 130 40

Currituck 39 122 1 1 38 162 0 1

Dare 79 318 9 2 86 496 8 0

Davidson 348 1,178 70 4 510 2,020 68 3

Davie 96 293 7 1 115 471 7 1

Duplin 135 354 25 8 204 712 19 7

Durham 421 2,380 85 45 919 4,055 85 29

Edgecombe 260 416 43 8 292 718 31 6

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 56 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

Admissions or Entries

From July 1, 1999 to June 30, 2000

Resident or Supervised

County of on June 30, 2000

Conviction Prison Probation Parole Post

Release

Prison Probation Parole Post

Release

Forsyth 936 2,396 126 57 1,678 4,129 104 39

Franklin 152 264 36 4 188 483 23 2

Gaston 390 706 119 22 718 1,632 82 14

Gates 25 62 5 1 21 102 3 1

Graham 14 77 4 0 14 116 2 0

Granville 132 241 21 7 188 465 15 3

Greene 91 102 6 1 86 213 4 0

Guilford 1,153 1,784 256 74 2,357 4,301 227 50

Halifax 221 757 55 7 274 1,368 43 4

Harnett 303 701 38 4 321 1,177 32 2

Haywood 93 293 24 2 129 519 18 2

Henderson 180 429 31 4 174 751 24 3

Hertford 142 353 18 9 195 557 17 6

Hoke 138 313 39 7 171 539 25 4

Hyde 25 59 2 1 29 108 1 0

Iredell 471 1,373 86 13 510 2,095 62 9

Jackson 33 137 9 0 49 277 6 0

Johnston 376 685 50 16 416 1,142 31 7

Jones 23 58 5 2 31 97 3 1

Lee 249 541 31 4 271 880 27 3

Lenoir 363 640 41 20 397 920 24 14

Lincoln 122 241 28 6 213 454 29 5

Macon 37 140 8 1 46 274 7 1

Madison 25 107 3 0 26 209 3 0

Martin 69 216 14 4 137 390 14 2

McDowell 131 268 26 2 129 462 26 1

Mecklenburg 997 4,258 218 63 2,010 6,748 158 47

Mitchell 17 51 5 0 22 122 5 0

Montgomery 125 382 19 2 108 653 10 1

Moore 259 888 41 10 283 1,340 33 6

Nash 411 672 51 5 353 977 34 4

New Hanover 1,130 2,017 112 16 792 3,745 91 9

Northampton 100 273 19 3 151 437 13 3

Onslow 257 806 31 12 407 1,367 41 7

Orange 228 410 36 14 297 741 31 5

Pamlico 28 98 10 1 43 141 7 1

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 57 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

Admissions or Entries

From July 1, 1999 to June 30, 2000

Resident or Supervised

County of on June 30, 2000

Conviction Prison Probation Parole Post

Release

Prison Probation Parole Post

Release

Pasquotank 150 381 15 4 185 565 10 3

Pender 128 271 17 1 135 539 9 2

Perquimans 18 47 2 3 36 92 2 1

Person 111 361 25 2 153 658 19 1

Pitt 420 1,187 71 22 652 2,096 57 13

Polk 23 117 6 0 29 203 3 0

Randolph 250 869 39 5 277 1,535 36 2

Richmond 203 485 43 10 275 876 22 3

Robeson 358 1,046 100 20 587 2,024 99 16

Rockingham 285 835 84 4 380 1,430 61 4

Rowan 575 1,432 81 18 620 2,238 62 12

Rutherford 197 508 50 4 241 850 39 3

Sampson 190 363 21 12 266 842 19 6

Scotland 174 488 51 5 238 1,003 37 4

Stanly 114 343 16 2 161 566 14 3

Stokes 80 287 17 4 110 719 14 1

Surry 223 552 43 4 251 1,324 32 3

Swain 22 114 13 0 28 186 9 0

Transylvania 54 147 13 2 58 262 5 1

Tyrrell 17 36 2 0 10 70 5 0

Union 240 739 35 14 354 1,409 24 9

Vance 221 370 41 13 251 831 33 9

Wake 1,589 4,481 222 53 2,134 7,887 182 38

Warren 53 85 20 4 79 238 10 3

Washington 44 97 10 3 78 214 6 3

Watauga 33 163 5 1 51 265 4 0

Wayne 380 1,052 63 30 623 1,929 50 16

Wilkes 152 535 39 4 261 1,210 30 2

Wilson 307 612 51 11 391 1,075 38 8

Yadkin 65 178 12 0 94 377 12 0

Yancey 24 53 5 0 27 145 4 0

Other 1,017 1,445 264 1 35 2,996 790 0

Total 24,161 60,114 4,298 937 31,396 107,256 3,911 617

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 58 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

Listing of Division of Prisons Facilities

Alamance Correctional Center Capacity: 46

315 Prison Camp Road, Graham, NC 27253- 0880 ( 336) 570- 6821

Albemarle Correctional Institution Capacity: 624

44150 Airport Road; New London, Badin, NC 28009 ( 704) 422- 3036

Anson Correctional Center Capacity: 252

Prison Camp Road, Polkton, NC 28135 ( 704) 694- 7500

Avery- Mitchell Correctional Institution Capacity: 624

600 Amity Park Road, Spruce Pine, NC 28777 ( 828) 765- 0229

Black Mountain Correctional Center for Women Capacity: 61

Old Hwy 70, Bldg 3, Black Mountain, NC 28711- 0609 ( 828) 669- 9165

Bladen Youth Center Capacity: 144

US 701 North, Elizabethtown, Elizabethtown, NC ( 910) 862- 3107

Blue Ridge Youth Center Capacity: 72

240 Prison Camp Road, Newland, NC 28657 ( 828) 765- 4237

Brown Creek Correctional Institution Capacity: 832

Route 1, Box 260DD, Polkton, NC 28135 ( 704) 694- 2622

Buncombe Correctional Center Capacity: 140

Highway 251 North, Asheville, NC 28814 ( 828) 645- 7630

Cabarrus Correctional Center Capacity: 164

130 Dutch Road, Mt. Pleasant, NC 28124 ( 704) 436- 6519

Caldwell Correctional Center Capacity: 184

480 Pleasant Hill Rd., Lenoir, Hudson, NC 28638 ( 828) 726- 2509

Caledonia Correctional Institution Capacity: 636

Highway 561 West, Tillery, NC 27887 ( 252) 826- 5621

Carteret Correctional Center Capacity: 244

1084 Orange Street, Newport, NC 28570- 0220 ( 252) 223- 5100

Caswell Correctional Center Capacity: 354

444 County Home Road, Yanceyville, NC 27379- 0217 ( 336) 694- 4531

Catawba Correctional Center Capacity: 200

Prison Camp Rd., Newton, NC 28658- 1347 ( 828) 466- 5521

Central Prison Capacity: 937

1300 Western Blvd, Raleigh, NC 27699- 4285 ( 919) 733- 0800

Charlotte Correctional Center Capacity: 214

4100 Meadow Oak Rd., Charlotte, NC 28208 ( 704) 357- 6030

Cleveland Correctional Center Capacity: 64

260 Kemper Road, Shelby, NC 28152 ( 704) 480- 5428

Columbus Correctional Institution Capacity: 584

Prison Camp Road, Brunswick, NC 28424 ( 910) 642- 3285

Cornell Treatment Center Capacity: 75

326 East Main Street, Durham, NC 27701 ( 919) 683- 6161

Craggy Correctional Center Capacity: 312

Hwy 251 North, Asheville, NC 28814- 8909 ( 828) 645- 5315

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 59 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

Craven Correctional Institution Capacity: 542

600 Alligator Road, Vanceboro, NC 28586 ( 252) 244- 3337

Currituck Correctional Center Capacity:

Maple Road, Maple, NC 27956 ( 252) 453- 2161

Dan River Prison Work Farm Capacity: 500

981 Murray Road, Yanceyville, NC 27379 ( 336) 694- 1583

Davidson Correctional Center Capacity: 196

1400 Thomason Street, Lexington, NC 27292 ( 336) 249- 7528

Duplin Correctional Center Capacity: 250

Hwy # 11 South, Kenansville, NC 28349 ( 910) 296- 0315

Durham Correctional Center Capacity: 180

3900 Guess Road, Durham, NC 27705- 3900 ( 919) 477- 2314

Eastern Correctional Institution Capacity: 393

Hyw. 903, Maury, NC 28554 ( 252) 747- 8101

Eco Half- Way House Capacity: 20

127 West Park Avenue, Charlotte, NC 28233 ( 704) 342- 4100

Evergreen Rehab Center Capacity: 75

20513 US 301 North, St. Pauls, NC 28384 ( 910) 865- 4581

Foothills Correctional Institution Capacity: 664

5150 Western Ave., Morganton, NC 28655- 7644 ( 828) 438- 5585

Forsyth Correctional Center Capacity: 196

307 Craft Dr., Winston Salem, NC 27105 ( 336) 896- 7041

Fountain Correctional Center for Women Capacity: 393

P. O. Box 1435, Rocky Mount, NC 27802 ( 252) 442- 9712

Franklin Correctional Center Capacity: 356

Highway 39 South, Bunn, NC 27508 ( 919) 496- 6119

Gaston Correctional Center Capacity: 200

1025 Dallas- Cherryville Hwy, Dallas, NC 28034- 0556 ( 704) 922- 3861

Gates Correctional Center Capacity: 76

Hwy 158 East, Gatesville, NC 27938- 9704 ( 252) 357- 0778

Greene Correctional Institution Capacity: 512

Highway 903, Maury, NC 28554 ( 252) 747- 3676

Guilford Correctional Center Capacity: 110

4250 Camp Burton Road, McLeansville, NC 27301 ( 336) 375- 5024

Harnett Correctional Institution Capacity: 820

1210 E. McNeill Street, Lillington, NC 27546 ( 910) 893- 2751

Haywood Correctional Center Capacity: 106

141 Hemlock Street, Waynesville, Hazelwood, NC 28738 ( 828) 452- 5141

Henderson Correctional Center Capacity: 114

697 Mountain Rd., Hendersonville, NC 28791 ( 828) 693- 1741

Hoke Correctional Institution Capacity: 424

Old Highway 211, Raeford, NC 28376 ( 910) 944- 7612

North Carolina Department of Correction Annual Statistical Report

Page 60 – Fiscal Year 1999- 2000

Hyde Correctional Institution Capacity: 600

State Rd. 1305, Swan Quarter, NC 27885 ( 252) 926- 1810

Johnston Correctional Institution Capacity: 484

2465 U S 70 West, Smithfield, NC 27577 ( 919) 934- 8386

LiNColn Correctional Center Capacity: 160

464 Prison Camp Road, Lincolnton, NC 28092 ( 704)